Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 58 references

Erbium-Doped Fibre Quantum Memory for Chip-Integrated Quantum-Dot Single Photons at 980 nm

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A chip-integrated quantum dot at 980 nm stores and recalls its single photons in an erbium-doped fiber memory, with no spectral tuning.

desk verdict A genuine new platform pairing—EDF at 980 nm meets a chip-integrated InAsP QD—with solid weak-pulse AFC storage and a weaker, but fixable, single-photon storage claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.01416 v1 pith:SXNTDO34 submitted 2025-08-02 quant-ph physics.app-phphysics.optics

Nasser Gohari Kamel , Arsalan Mansourzadeh , Ujjwal Gautam , Vinaya Kumar Kavatamane , Ashutosh Singh , Edith Yeung , David B. Northeast , Paul Barclay
show 3 more authors
Philip J. Poole Dan Dalacu Daniel Oblak
This is my paper
classification quant-phphysics.app-phphysics.optics
keywords quantummemoryerbium-dopedfiberatomicfrequencycombdotsinglephotonsnanowire980nmtransitionhybridlight-matterinterfacemultimodestorage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first experimental hybrid light–matter interface in which photons from a deterministic, chip-integrated quantum dot are stored and recalled in a solid-state quantum memory. The emitter is an InAsP/InP nanowire quantum dot whose negatively charged exciton line (X1−) sits near 980 nm, and the memory is a 10 m erbium-doped fiber cooled to about 10 mK, operated on the 4I15/2↔4I11/2 transition of Er3+ with an 8 GHz atomic frequency comb. The authors achieve spectral overlap without tuning the quantum dot, characterize the erbium transition's spin population lifetime and optical coherence, and demonstrate storage of 59 weak coherent temporal modes as well as the X1− single photons for five storage times. The result matters because it connects a deterministic on-chip single-photon source directly to a fiber-compatible, broadband quantum memory.

What carries the argument

The central object is an atomic frequency comb (AFC) prepared on the 4I15/2↔4I11/2 transition at 980 nm in a 10 m erbium-doped fiber cooled to about 10 mK. An AFC is a periodic series of narrow absorbing teeth carved into an inhomogeneously broadened ensemble by optical pumping, with storage time t_s=1/Δ for comb spacing Δ and bandwidth Γ_AFC=NΔ. The paper's preparation approach modulates both amplitude and phase of the pump pulses to produce squarish teeth with an order-of-magnitude better hole burning efficiency than conventional methods; the resulting 8 GHz combs have finesse about 2 and background optical depth 0.05. Supporting measurements give a spin population lifetime with two components (6.75 s and 385 s) and an optical coherence time of about 2.6 µs, which together make the transition suitable for photon-echo protocols. Expected memory efficiency is 6.7%, with measured total efficiency 1% because of 83% transmission loss from splicing and connectors.

What would settle it

Measure the X1− linewidth with a high-resolution spectrometer or scanning Fabry-Perot and monitor its center wavelength continuously during a 1200 s storage run; if the line drifts out of the 8 GHz comb, or if the transmission increase in Fig. 5a disappears when the dot is excited above-band, the single-photon storage claim fails. A cleaner control would alternate storage runs with the AFC hole burned on-resonance and off-resonance and compare recall rates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Er3+ ions in glass silica fiber are a viable quantum memory for a chip-integrated InAsP quantum dot at 980 nm, and the paper demonstrates this by deterministic storage and recall of X1− photons in an 8 GHz bandwidth atomic frequency comb. No electric, magnetic, or strain tuning of the quantum dot is used; compatibility comes from the roughly 10 nm inhomogeneous broadening of the erbium 980 nm transition, which is wide enough to engulf the dot's emission. The recalled echo preserves the input temporal profile, the estimated g(2)_out(0)=0.5547±0.001 lies below the classical limit of 1, and weak-coherent time-bin storage fidelity is estimated at 87.6%, above the classical bound of 66.7%. The paper states that no qubit is encoded; the temporal profile of the single photon is mapped directly onto the memory.

Load-bearing premise

The recalled echoes count as stored single photons only if the quantum dot's X1− line stayed inside the 8 GHz comb for the whole 1200 s run; the overlap is checked by burning a broad spectral hole and seeing transmission rise, but the dot's intrinsic linewidth is not measured, so drift or background emission could mimic the signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A deterministic chip-integrated source can be temporally stored and recalled in a fiber-based AFC memory without spectral tuning, shifting the wavelength-matching burden onto the memory's broad inhomogeneous bandwidth.
  • The 980 nm erbium transition in fiber is coherent enough for photon-echo quantum storage, with multi-second spin lifetimes and microsecond optical coherence, adding a new wavelength channel for memories.
  • The demonstrated 59-mode storage, with a potential 144 modes within the 8 GHz bandwidth, supports temporal multiplexing of deterministic sources.
  • Retrieved X1− photons have an estimated g(2)_out(0)=0.5547, below the classical threshold of 1, indicating that the recalled light retains nonclassical photon statistics despite the low SNR.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct measurement of the quantum dot's intrinsic linewidth and wavelength drift during the 1200 s integration would test whether the recalled echo is single-photon storage rather than background or InP emission.
  • Because 980 nm is a standard erbium amplifier band, this interface could in principle drop into existing fiber networks as a memory module once efficiency and coherence improve.
  • The same recipe may transfer to other rare-earth transitions that overlap InAsP quantum dot emission, such as 171Yb3+ doped crystals near 978.54 nm, making the hybrid interface a general strategy rather than a single-wavelength fix.
  • The amplitude-and-phase-modulated AFC preparation could improve hole burning efficiency in other rare-earth-doped fibers, potentially raising multimode capacity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a spectroscopic characterization of the 4I15/2 ↔ 4I11/2 transition of Er3+ in an erbium-doped fiber (EDF) at 980 nm and 10 mK, including absorption, spin population lifetime, and optical coherence time. It then implements an 8 GHz atomic frequency comb (AFC) memory in this transition and demonstrates storage and retrieval of 59 weak coherent temporal modes with an efficiency of about 1%, consistent with a forward calculation from the measured optical depth and finesse. The central claim is the deterministic storage and recall of the X1- emission from a chip-integrated InAsP/InP nanowire quantum dot in this AFC memory, without spectral tuning of the quantum dot. The recalled photon statistics are not measured directly but are estimated from the measured signal-to-noise ratio via Eq. (2).

Significance. If the quantum-dot storage claim holds, this would be a valuable step toward a coherent hybrid interface between a deterministic on-chip single-photon source and a solid-state quantum memory at 980 nm. The spectroscopic characterization of the 980 nm EDF transition at millikelvin temperatures is a useful contribution, and the weak-coherent-pulse AFC memory with 59 multimode storage is a solid, internally consistent result. The paper's forward efficiency calculation from independently measured parameters is a positive feature. However, the evidence for the central quantum-dot storage claim is incomplete: the spectral overlap between the X1- line and the 8 GHz AFC is established only with a coarse spectrometer and an 8 GHz spectral hole, the stability of the QD line over the 1200 s integration is assumed rather than measured, and the single-photon character of the recalled light is only estimated, with a numerical inconsistency in the stated formula.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section II, Fig. 5a, and Methods IV] The spectral overlap between the X1- emission and the 8 GHz AFC is not established with sufficient resolution. The coarse wavelength alignment uses a spectrometer with 50 GHz resolution (Methods IV), which is more than six times the AFC bandwidth, and the subsequent transmission measurement through an 8 GHz spectral hole yields a fitted FWHM of 8.05 GHz that the authors explicitly state does not correspond to the intrinsic QD linewidth. At the operating excitation power (>1.7 µW), additional QD emission features appear near 972 and 977 nm (Fig. 4a), and no high-resolution spectrum of the filtered light is shown to demonstrate that only the X1- line falls within the AFC passband. The authors should provide a sub-GHz spectrum of the filtered QD emission, a direct linewidth measurement, or a control experiment (e.g., detuning the AFC or blocking the QD excitation) to rule out contamination of the recalled echo by other spectral components. This is load-bearing for the claim of deterministic storage and recall of the X1- single-photon emission.
  2. [Section II, Fig. 5b] The assumption that the X1- emission frequency remains fixed for the entire 1200 s integration period is not experimentally verified. The storage sequence is repeated 480 times over 1200 s, and if the QD line drifts out of the 8 GHz AFC window during this time, the recalled echo would be suppressed or diluted. The paper states that 'the frequency of QD emission remains fixed throughout the experiment' but provides no monitoring of the QD wavelength or of the transmission through the spectral hole during the integration. The authors should report a time-resolved measurement of the QD emission position or a stability trace over the full 1200 s, or reduce the integration time to match a measured stability window.
  3. [Eq. (2) and accompanying text] The estimate of the recalled photon statistics is not directly measured, and the presented numerical result is not reproducible from the stated formula. With S = 1.92 and g_in(0) = 0.207, the formula as printed (g_out = 1 + (S^2 + g_in)/(1+S)^2) gives a value above 1, while the paper reports g_out(0) = 0.5547. Even under common definitions of SNR for signal mixed with Poissonian noise, the result is typically 0.66 rather than 0.55. The authors should clarify the definition of S, correct the typographical rendering of Eq. (2), and either provide a consistent numerical estimate or, preferably, measure the g(2) of the recalled echo directly with a Hanbury-Brown-Twiss detection setup. This is important because the single-photon character of the retrieved light is a central part of the claim that the interface stores non-classical light from the quantum dot.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 4a] The identification of the X, XX, and X1- peaks in the main panel of Fig. 4a is not clear; please add explicit labels or arrows in the main spectrum so the reader can associate each feature with the corresponding emission line, especially given the additional peaks at 972 and 977 nm at high excitation power.
  2. [Methods IV] Please specify the cutoff wavelengths of the two free-space high-pass filters and the effective bandpass of the 1200 grooves/mm grating (0.5 nm resolution), so the reader can assess which of the QD emission lines observed in Fig. 4a are rejected in the storage experiments.
  3. [Section II, paragraph on QD excitation] The statement that 'all subsequent experiments were conducted with an excitation power of more than 1.7 µW (above saturation power)' should be reconciled with the g(2)(0) = 0.207 value; please clarify whether the g(2) and storage measurements used the same power and discuss the effect of above-saturation excitation on the single-photon purity and on the appearance of the 972/977 nm features.
  4. [Methods IV, storage protocol] The acronym MEMS is used without definition at its first occurrence in the storage protocol description; please spell out 'micro-electro-mechanical system' and define the role of the MEMS switches in the timing sequence.
  5. [Fig. 5b caption] The caption does not list the five storage durations shown in the panel; if they correspond to the same values used for the weak coherent pulses (e.g., 5 to 100 ns), please state them explicitly.
  6. [Section II, AFC preparation] The claim of 'approximately an order of magnitude improvement in spectral hole burning efficiency' relative to conventional techniques should be quantified or referenced in the Supplementary Information, so the reader can evaluate the comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the memory-efficiency figure is a forward calculation from independently measured optical depth, finesse, and background absorption, and the storage demonstrations rest on direct measurements rather than on fitted inputs or self-citation.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The AFC efficiency prediction uses Eq. (1) with independently measured parameters (maximum OD = 1.1, background OD = 0.05, finesse F ≃ 2) to obtain an expected efficiency of 6.7%, and the measured total efficiency of 1% is separately accounted for by an independently characterized 83% transmission loss; no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The spin population lifetime (T1S = 6.75 s and 385 s) and optical coherence time (T2O ≈ 2–2.6 µs) are direct spectral-hole and Hahn-echo measurements. The quantum-dot characterization (lifetime 3.08 ns, g(2)(0) = 0.072 under CW excitation, pulsed coincidence 0.207) is likewise direct. The recalled X1− echo is an observed temporal signal, and the estimated recalled g(2)_out(0) = 0.5547 is a stated estimate from Eq. (2) using the measured input g(2)_in(0) and SNR; even if this estimate is imperfect, it is not the definition of the storage result. Self-citations [10] and [51] are contextual references to the authors' related work and are not load-bearing; the AFC protocol [44], efficiency formula [54], and the g(2) estimation method [11] are external. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the 8.05 GHz Lorentzian from the alignment scan does not correspond to the intrinsic QD linewidth, which is an experimental limitation rather than a circular step. Concerns about unmeasured QD spectral purity, drift over the 1200 s integration, and background emission are correctness and verification risks, not instances of the derivation reducing to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is an experimental demonstration, so there is no mathematical derivation with hidden free parameters. The efficiency calculation in Eq. (1) uses measured optical depths and a chosen finesse; the spin and coherence times are characterized rather than assumed. The main implicit assumptions are the validity of the AFC protocol for this transition and the spectral stability of the quantum dot emission over the long integration time.

free parameters (4)
  • AFC finesse F = ≈ 2
    Set by the optical-pumping pulse design; enters Eq. (1) and controls the expected efficiency. This is an experimental setting, not an unexplained fit.
  • Background optical depth d0 = 0.05
    Measured after spectral tailoring; used in Eq. (1) to account for efficiency loss. A measured quantity, included for transparency.
  • Peak optical depth d = 1.1
    Maximum OD of the EDF at 980 nm, measured from the absorption spectrum; used in Eq. (1). Not a free fitting parameter of the central claim.
  • Mean photon number per mode μ = 1.15×10^-4
    Calibrated input for the weak coherent pulse storage; used with SNR to estimate time-bin qubit fidelity. A controlled experimental parameter.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Atomic Frequency Comb memory theory (Afzelius et al. 2009) including Eq. (1) efficiency relation
    The storage and efficiency claims rest on this prior protocol; the paper applies it to EDF at 980 nm rather than re-deriving it. See Eq. (1).
  • domain assumption Er3+ 4I15/2 to 4I11/2 transition assignment and Zeeman level structure in silica fiber
    The paper assumes the 980 nm absorption band in the EDF arises from this erbium transition and that optical pumping creates persistent spectral holes with the two observed ion classes. See Fig. 2 and Methods.
  • standard math Spectroscopic and correlation analysis models (exponentially modified Gaussian for lifetime, two-level g(2) models, double exponential hole decay)
    Standard fitting models from cited literature; assumed valid for these measurements.
  • domain assumption Quantum-dot emission at X1- is filtered to single-photon quality and remains stable over hours
    The storage conclusion depends on the filtered emission being the negative trion line at 980 nm with no significant background from the 972/977 nm lines or InP Wurtzite emission. See Fig. 4a and Methods.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Erbium-Doped Fibre Quantum Memory for Chip-Integrated Quantum-Dot Single Photons at 980 nm." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXNTDO34

@misc{pith2026250801416,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Erbium-Doped Fibre Quantum Memory for Chip-Integrated Quantum-Dot Single Photons at 980 nm},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXNTDO34}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.01416}
}
abstract

The realization of long-distance quantum communication and the envisioned quantum internet relies on coherent hybrid light-matter interfaces connecting quantum light emitters with quantum memory (QM) systems. Unlike probabilistic photon pair sources such as spontaneous parametric down-conversion, deterministic quantum light emitters enable the on-demand production of pure and bright single and entangled photons, essential for scalable quantum networks. In this work, we present the first experimental realization of a coherent hybrid light-matter interface between a chip-integrated InAsP/InP nanowire quantum dot (QD) and a solid-state QM based on Er$^{3+}$ ions doped in a glass silica fiber (erbium-doped fiber, EDF). The emission spectrum of the InAsP/InP nanowire QD aligns with the absorption bandwidth of the EDF at 980 nm at cryogenic temperatures, allowing efficient interaction between the two systems. To demonstrate this, we present a spectroscopic characterization of the $^{4}I_{15/2} \leftrightarrow ^{4}I_{11/2}$ optical transition in EDF at 980 nm. Our measurements reveal substantial inhomogeneous broadening of this optical transition and a long spin population lifetime, underscoring EDFs potential for broadband QM implementation. We implement an 8 GHz bandwidth multimode QM based on the Atomic Frequency Comb protocol, enabling the storage and retrieval of 59 weak coherent pulses. Furthermore, we characterize single-photon emission from an InAsP/InP nanowire QD at 980 nm and demonstrate its deterministic storage and recall in the EDF QM. Notably, this is achieved without spectral tuning of the QD emission, demonstrating its direct compatibility with a solid-state QM.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.01416 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Heindel, J.-H

    T. Heindel, J.-H. Kim, N. Gregersen, A. Rastelli, and S. Reitzenstein, Quantum dots for photonic quantum in- formation technology, Advances in Optics and Photonics 15, 613 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    J. L. O’brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nature photonics3, 687 (2009)

    work page 2009

  3. [3]

    R. Uppu, L. Midolo, X. Zhou, J. Carolan, and P. Lodahl, Quantum-dot-based deterministic photon–emitter inter- faces for scalable photonic quantum technology, Nature Nanotechnology 16, 1308 – 1317 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    L.-M. Duan, M. D.Lukin, J. I.Cirac, andP. Zoller,Long- distance quantum communication with atomic ensembles and linear optics, Nature414, 413–418 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    Lago-Rivera, J

    D. Lago-Rivera, J. V. Rakonjac, S. Grandi, and H. d. Riedmatten, Long distance multiplexed quantum tele- portation from a telecom photon to a solid-state qubit, Nature Communications 14, 1889 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    T. D. Ladd, F. Jelezko, R. Laflamme, Y. Nakamura, C. Monroe, and J. L. O’Brien, Quantum computers, Na- ture 464, 45–53 (2010)

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    H.DeRaedt, F.Jin, D.Willsch, M.Willsch, N.Yoshioka, N. Ito, S. Yuan, and K. Michielsen, Massively parallel quantum computer simulator, eleven years later, Com- puter Physics Communications237, 47–61 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Aharonovich, D

    I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single-photon emitters, Nature photonics10, 631 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Heshami, D

    K. Heshami, D. G. England, P. C. Humphreys, P. J. Bustard, V. M. Acosta, J. Nunn, and B. J. Sussman, Quantum memories: emerging applications and recent advances, Journal of modern optics63, 2005 (2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    N. G. Kamel, S. Kumar, U. Gautam, E. Saglamyurek, V. Salari, and D. Oblak, Multimode and Random-Access optical quantum memory via adiabatic phase imprinting, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2506.12223 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. E. Thomas, L. Wagner, R. Joos, R. Sittig, C. Nawrath, P. Burdekin, I. M. de Buy Wenniger, M. J. Rasiah, T. Huber-Loyola, S. Sagona-Stophel,et al., Deterministic storage and retrieval of telecom light from a quantum dot single-photon source interfaced with an atomic quantum ...

    2024

  4. [12]

    R. A. Maruf, S. Venuturumilli, D. Bharadwaj, P. An- derson, J. Qiu, Y. Yuan, M. Zeeshan, B. Semnani, P. J. Poole, D. Dalacu,et al., Widely tunable solid-state source of single-photons matching an atomic transition, arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.06734 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Vural, S

    H. Vural, S. L. Portalupi, J. Maisch, S. Kern, J. H. We- ber, M. Jetter, J. Wrachtrup, R. Löw, I. Gerhardt, and P.Michler,Two-photoninterferenceinanatom–quantum dot hybrid system, Optica5, 367 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    Y. Chen, J. Zhang, M. Zopf, K. Jung, Y. Zhang, R. Keil, F. Ding, and O. G. Schmidt, Wavelength-tunable entan- gled photons from silicon-integrated iii–v quantum dots, Nature communications 7, 10387 (2016)

    2016

  7. [15]

    Meyer, R

    H. Meyer, R. Stockill, M. Steiner, C. Le Gall, C. Matthiesen, E. Clarke, A. Ludwig, J. Reichel, M. Atatüre, and M. Köhl, Direct photonic coupling of a semiconductor quantum dot and a trapped ion, Physi- cal review letters114, 123001 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Tang, Z.-Q

    J.-S. Tang, Z.-Q. Zhou, Y.-T. Wang, Y.-L. Li, X. Liu, Y.-L. Hua, Y. Zou, S. Wang, D.-Y. He, G. Chen,et al., Storage of multiple single-photon pulses emitted from a quantum dot in a solid-state quantum memory, Nature communications 6, 8652 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    Akopian, L

    N. Akopian, L. Wang, A. Rastelli, O. G. Schmidt, and V. Zwiller, Hybrid semiconductor-atomic interface: slow- ing down single photons from a quantum dot, Nature Photonics 5, 230–233 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Studenikin, R

    J.Phoenix, M.Korkusinski, D.Dalacu, P.J.Poole, P.Za- wadzki, S. Studenikin, R. L. Williams, A. S. Sachrajda, and L. Gaudreau, Magnetic tuning of tunnel coupling between InAsP double quantum dots in InP nanowires, Scientific Reports 12, 5100 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    J. Lee, E. Murray, A. Bennett, D. Ellis, C. Dangel, I. Far- rer, P. Spencer, D. A.Ritchie, and A.Shields, Electrically 10 driven and electrically tunable quantum light sources, Applied Physics Letters110, 10.1063/1.4976197 (2017)

    2017 doi

  12. [20]

    Neuwirth, F

    J. Neuwirth, F. B. Basset, M. B. Rota, E. Roccia, C. Schimpf, K. D. Jöns, A. Rastelli, and R. Trotta, Quan- tum dot technology for quantum repeaters: from en- tangled photon generation toward the integration with quantum memories, Materials for Quantum Technology 1, 043001 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    Ruskuc, C.-J

    A. Ruskuc, C.-J. Wu, E. Green, S. L. Hermans, J. Choi, and A. Faraon, Scalable multipartite entan- glement of remote rare-earth ion qubits, arXiv preprint 10.48550/arXiv.2402.16224 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  14. [22]

    S. Rodt, S. Reitzenstein, and T. Heindel, Deterministi- cally fabricated solid-state quantum-light sources, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter32, 153003 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    M. A. Versteegh, M. E. Reimer, K. D. Jöns, D. Dalacu, P. J. Poole, A. Gulinatti, A. Giudice, and V. Zwiller, Observation of strongly entangled photon pairs from a nanowire quantum dot, Nature communications5, 5298 (2014)

    2014

  16. [24]

    Lapointe, M

    P.Laferrière, E.Yeung, I.Miron, D.B.Northeast, S.Haf- fouz, J. Lapointe, M. Korkusinski, P. J. Poole, R. L. Williams, and D. Dalacu, Unity yield of deterministically positioned quantum dot single photon sources, Scientific Reports 12, 6376 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Yeung, D

    E. Yeung, D. B. Northeast, J. Jin, P. Laferrière, M. Ko- rkusinski, P.J.Poole, R.L.Williams,andD.Dalacu,On- chip indistinguishable photons using iii-v nanowire/sin hybrid integration, Physical Review B 108, 195417 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    A. N. Wakileh, L. Yu, D. Dokuz, S. Haffouz, X. Wu, J. Lapointe, D. B. Northeast, R. L. Williams, N. Roten- berg, P. J. Poole, et al. , Single photon emission in the telecom c-band from nanowire-based quantum dots, Ap- plied Physics Letters124, 10.1063/5.0179234 (2024)

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    Haffouz, P

    S. Haffouz, P. Poole, J. Jin, X. Wu, L. Ginet, K. Mnaym- neh, D. Dalacu, and R. Williams, Single quantum dot- in-a-rod embedded in a photonic nanowire waveguide for telecom band emission, Applied Physics Letters117, 10.1063/5.0020681 (2020)

    2020 doi

  20. [28]

    W. T. Carnall, G. L. Goodman, K. Rajnak, and R. S. Rana, A systematic analysis of the spectra of the lan- thanides doped into single crystal laf3, The Journal of chemical physics 90, 3443 (1989)

    1989

  21. [29]

    Tanabe, Optical transitions of rare earth ions for am- plifiers: how the local structure works in glass, Journal of non-crystalline solids259, 1 (1999)

    S. Tanabe, Optical transitions of rare earth ions for am- plifiers: how the local structure works in glass, Journal of non-crystalline solids259, 1 (1999)

    1999

  22. [30]

    Zhong, M

    M. Zhong, M. P. Hedges, R. L. Ahlefeldt, J. G. Bartholomew, S. E. Beavan, S. M. Wittig, J. J. Longdell, and M. J. Sellars, Optically addressable nuclear spins in a solid with a six-hour coherence time, Nature517, 177–180 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Nicolas, M

    L. Nicolas, M. Businger, T. Sanchez Mejia, A. Tiranov, T. Chanelière, E. Lafitte-Houssat, A. Ferrier, P. Gold- ner, and M. Afzelius, Coherent optical-microwave inter- face for manipulation of low-field electronic clock transi- tions in 171Yb3+ : Y2SiO5, npj Quantum Information...

    2023

  24. [32]

    S.-H. Wei, B. Jing, X.-Y. Zhang, J.-Y. Liao, H. Li, L.- X. You, Z. Wang, Y. Wang, G.-W. Deng, H.-Z. Song, et al., Quantum storage of 1650 modes of single photons at telecom wavelength, npj Quantum Information10, 19 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    Businger, L

    M. Businger, L. Nicolas, T. S. Mejia, A. Ferrier, P. Gold- ner, and M. Afzelius, Non-classical correlations over 1250 modes between telecom photons and 979-nm photons stored in 171Yb3+ : Y2SiO5, Nature communications13, 6438 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Ma, Y.-Z

    Y. Ma, Y.-Z. Ma, Z.-Q. Zhou, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, One-hour coherent optical storage in an atomic frequency comb memory, Nature communications12, 2381 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    A. Ortu, J. V. Rakonjac, A. Holzäpfel, A. Seri, S. Grandi, M. Mazzera, H. de Riedmatten, and M. Afzelius, Multi- mode capacity of atomic-frequency comb quantum mem- ories,QuantumScienceandTechnology 7,035024(2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Saglamyurek, J

    E. Saglamyurek, J. Jin, V. B. Verma, M. D. Shaw, F. Marsili, S. W. Nam, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Quan- tum storage of entangled telecom-wavelength photons in an erbium-doped optical fibre, Nature Photonics9, 83–87 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    Jiang, W

    M.-H. Jiang, W. Xue, Q. He, Y.-Y. An, X. Zheng, W.-J. Xu, Y.-B. Xie, Y. Lu, S. Zhu, and X.-S. Ma, Quantum storage of entangled photons at telecom wavelengths in a crystal, Nature Communications14, 6995 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Lago-Rivera, S

    D. Lago-Rivera, S. Grandi, J. V. Rakonjac, A. Seri, and H. de Riedmatten, Telecom-heralded entanglement be- tween multimode solid-state quantum memories, Nature 594, 37 – 40 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Verma, M

    M.L.G.Puigibert, M.F.Askarani, J.H.Davidson, V.B. Verma, M. D. Shaw, S. W. Nam, T. Lutz, G. C. Amaral, D. Oblak, and W. Tittel, Entanglement and nonlocality between disparate solid-state quantum memories medi- ated by photons, Physical Review Research 2, 013039 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Aharonovich and E

    I. Aharonovich and E. Neu, Diamond nanophotonics, Ad- vanced Optical Materials2, 911 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    R. Li, F. Liu, and Q. Lu, Quantum light source based on semiconductor quantum dots: a review, Photonics 10, 639 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    F. P. García de Arquer, D. V. Talapin, V. I. Klimov, Y.Arakawa, M.Bayer,andE.H.Sargent,Semiconductor quantum dots: Technological progress and future chal- lenges, Science 373, eaaz8541 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Couteau, Spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Contemporary Physics 59, 291 – 304 (2018)

    C. Couteau, Spontaneous parametric down-conversion, Contemporary Physics 59, 291 – 304 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Afzelius, C

    M. Afzelius, C. Simon, H. De Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Multimode quantum memory based on atomic frequency combs, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Op- tical Physics 79, 052329 (2009)

    2009

  37. [45]

    Saglamyurek, N

    E. Saglamyurek, N. Sinclair, J. Jin, J. A. Slater, D. Oblak, F. Bussieres, M. George, R. Ricken, W. Sohler, and W. Tittel, Broadband waveguide quantum memory for entangled photons, Nature469, 512 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    Brida, G

    D. Brida, G. Krauss, A. Sell, and A. Leitenstorfer, Ultra- broadband er: Fiber lasers, Laser and Photonics Reviews 8, 409 – 428 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    See the Supplementary Information,

  40. [48]

    Stachurski, S

    J. Stachurski, S. Tamariz, G. Callsen, R. Butté, and N. Grandjean, Single photon emission and recombina- tion dynamics in self-assembled gan/aln quantum dots, Light: Science & Applications11, 114 (2022)

    2022

  41. [49]

    Holewa, D

    P. Holewa, D. A. Vajner, E. Zięba-Ostój, M. Wasiluk, B. Gaál, A. Sakanas, M. Burakowski, P. Mrowiński, B. Krajnik, M. Xiong,et al., High-throughput quantum photonic devices emitting indistinguishable photons in the telecom c-band, Nature Communications 15, 3358 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Yeung, D

    E. Yeung, D. B. Northeast, J. Jin, P. Laferrière, M. Ko- 11 rkusinski, P.J.Poole, R.L.Williams,andD.Dalacu,On- chip indistinguishable photons using iii-v nanowire/sin hybrid integration, Physical Review B 108, 195417 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Bornadel, S

    M. Bornadel, S. S. Alavijeh, F. Rasekh, N. G. Kamel, F. K. Asadi, E. Saglamyurek, D. Oblak, and C. Simon, Hole burning experiments and modeling in erbium-doped silica glass fibers down to millikelvin temperatures: ev- idence for ultra-long population storage, arXiv preprint (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Saglamyurek, T

    E. Saglamyurek, T. Lutz, L. Veissier, M. P. Hedges, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, and W. Tittel, Efficient and long-lived zeeman-sublevel atomic population storage in an erbium-doped glass fiber, Physical Review B 92, 241111 (2015)

    2015

  45. [53]

    E. L. Hahn, Spin echoes, Physical review80, 580 (1950)

    1950

  46. [54]

    Z. Li, Y. Lei, T. Kling, and M. Hosseini, Efficient stor- age of multidimensional telecom photons in a Solid- State quantum memory, Optica Quantum 10.1364/op- ticaq.564321 (2025)

    2025 doi

  47. [55]

    Usmani, M

    I. Usmani, M. Afzelius, H. De Riedmatten, and N. Gisin, Mapping multiple photonic qubits into and out of one solid-state atomic ensemble, Nature Communications1, 10.1038/ncomms1010 (2010)

    2010 doi

  48. [56]

    Gündoğan, P

    M. Gündoğan, P. M. Ledingham, A. Almasi, M. Cris- tiani, and H. De Riedmatten, Quantum storage of a pho- tonic polarization qubit in a solid, Physical review letters 108, 190504 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Williams, D

    P.Laferriere, E.Yeung, M.Korkusinski, P.J.Poole, R.L. Williams, D. Dalacu, J. Manalo, M. Cygorek, A. Altin- tas, and P. Hawrylak, Systematic study of the emission spectra of nanowire quantum dots, Applied Physics Let- ters 118, 10.1063/5.0045880 (2021)

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    Laferriere, E

    P. Laferriere, E. Yeung, L. Giner, S. Haffouz, J. La- pointe, G. C. Aers, P. J. Poole, R. L. Williams, and D. Dalacu, Multiplexed single-photon source based on multiple quantum dots embedded within a single nanowire, Nano letters20, 3688 (2020)

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.