Holographic symmetry algebra for the MHV sector revisited

Milan Patra; Mousumi Maitra; Raju Mandal; Shamik Banerjee

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 19 references

Holographic symmetry algebra for the MHV sector revisited

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims the complete symmetry algebra in the MHV graviton sector is the semidirect product of the $w_{1+\infty}$ algebra and an infinite Abelian algebra generated by conformally soft negative-helicity gravitons, whose extra null…

desk verdict Solid new symmetry algebra and null states for MHV amplitudes, but the paper stops right before the advertised payoff—the two missing KZ equations are never actually derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.02098 v3 pith:BO7PPNWW submitted 2025-08-04 hep-th

Shamik Banerjee , Mousumi Maitra , Raju Mandal , Milan Patra This is my paper

classification hep-th

keywords celestialholographyMHVamplitudesconformallysoftgravitonsgluonsw_{1+∞}algebraKZequationsOPEholographicsymmetry

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to complete the symmetry algebra that governs tree-level maximally helicity violating (MHV) scattering amplitudes in celestial holography. It claims that the full algebra in the MHV graviton sector is a semidirect product of the $w_{1+\infty}$ algebra and an infinite Abelian algebra whose generators are conformally soft negative-helicity gravitons, and that the MHV gluon sector has the same structure with the $S$ algebra in place of $w_{1+\infty}$. The motivation is a known gap: an $n$-point MHV amplitude obeys only $n-2$ Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov-type differential equations, whereas a Wess-Zumino-Witten-type conformal field theory would suggest $n$. The paper argues that the additional Abelian symmetries create new null states, and that decoupling those null states yields the two missing KZ-type equations.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mixed-helicity celestial OPE between a positive- and a negative-helicity conformal primary, combined with the conformally soft limit. Defining $\bar H^k = \lim_{\Delta\to k}(\Delta-k)G^-_{\Delta}$ for $k=-2,-3,\dots$ turns the OPE into a truncated mode expansion, and the modes satisfy $[\bar w^p_m,\bar w^q_n]=0$ together with $[w^p_m,\bar w^q_n]=[m(q-1)-n(p-1)]\bar w^{p+q-2}_{m+n}$; the analogous gluon currents $\bar R^{k,a}$ obey $[\bar S^{p,a}_m,\bar S^{q,b}_n]=0$ and are shifted by the $S$-algebra generators. This semidirect structure is what generates the new KZ-type null states, such as $L_{-1}G^-_{\Delta}+H^0_{-1,0}G^-_{\Delta}+(\Delta+3)H^1_{-3/2,-1/2}G^-_{\Delta-1}+H^0_{0,-1}H^1_{-3/2,1/2}G^-_{\Delta-1}+\bar H^{-3}_{5/2,-1/2}G^+_{\Delta+3}=0$ for gravitons and its gluon counterpart with the adjoint Casimir $C_A$.

What would settle it

Compute the action of the new soft mode $\bar H^{-3}_{5/2,-1/2}$ on an $n$-point MHV graviton correlator from the mixed-helicity OPE, insert null state (3.4), and check whether the resulting expression is a differential equation that is independent of the $n-2$ known KZ equations and satisfied by the known MHV amplitude. If the new terms vanish identically, or merely reproduce an existing equation, the claimed completion of the KZ system is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that negative-helicity conformally soft gravitons and gluons are not spectators in the MHV sector: they generate an infinite-dimensional Abelian symmetry algebra, and this Abelian piece is needed to complete the holographic symmetry algebra. Previous results had identified the $w_{1+\infty}$ algebra from conformally soft positive-helicity gravitons and the $S$ algebra from positive-helicity gluons, but the puzzle of the two missing KZ-type equations remained. The paper shows that taking the conformally soft limit of the negative-helicity operators in the mixed-helicity OPE gives new currents $\bar H^k$ and $\bar R^{k,a}$, that these currents commute among themselves and are acted on by the positive-helicity generators, and that the extended algebra admits null states involving the $L_{-1}$ descendant of a hard negative-helicity operator. Decoupling these null states, the paper claims, produces the two missing KZ-type differential equations for $n$-point MHV amplitudes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing step is the assumption that the null-state identity in section 3 can be turned into a differential equation for MHV amplitudes. The paper does not specify how the new soft mode $\bar H^{-3}_{5/2,-1/2}$ acts on the hard operators in the correlator, and the section stops at the identity without applying it; if that action is not well defined, the two missing equations are not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The complete holographic symmetry algebra in the MHV graviton sector is the semidirect product $w_{1+\infty} \ltimes \mathrm{Abelian}$, and in the MHV gluon sector it is $S \ltimes \mathrm{Abelian}$.
An $n$-point MHV amplitude will satisfy a full set of $n$ KZ-type differential equations, with the two previously missing equations coming from null states of the new Abelian generators.
Conformally soft negative-helicity gravitons and gluons carry genuine symmetry content even though they have no energetic soft limit in the MHV sector.
The gravity and gauge-theory constructions are exactly parallel: both use the same conformally soft limit, both produce a commuting current algebra, and both yield KZ-type null states involving a hard negative-helicity descendant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A concrete next step is to insert the graviton null state into an explicit closed-form MHV amplitude formula, such as a Hodges-type expression, and verify that the two new differential equations are independent of the known $n-2$; this would turn the existence claim into a checked derivation.
The same conformally soft Abelian construction may extend beyond the MHV sector, where additional singular terms appear in the mixed-helicity OPE; if it does, the mechanism of completing a KZ system by commuting currents could generalize to next-to-MHV correlators.
Because the new generators commute among themselves, they may serve as conserved charges labelling MHV states independently of the $w_{1+\infty}$ dynamics, making the completeness of the symmetry algebra visible in the celestial CFT spectrum.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper finds a genuinely new infinite Abelian symmetry algebra in the MHV sector: conformally soft negative-helicity gravitons (and gluons) generate an Abelian ideal, so the full algebra is a semidirect product with w1+∞ (or the S algebra). That part is real and the derivations in Appendices A and B are careful, explicit, and reproducible from the known OPEs. The null states (3.4) and (5.2) are also new as written. If you work on celestial holography, this is worth knowing about.

The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note lands. The abstract and Section 3 promise that the additional null states "give rise to the two missing equations," but the paper never performs the insertion of (3.4) or (5.2) into an n-point MHV correlator. To get a KZ equation you need to act with the negative-helicity soft modes on the hard operators, and that action is never written down. The term \bar H^{-3}_{5/2,-1/2} G^+_{\Delta+3} in (3.4) requires precisely such an action, and it is absent. So the central "use" claim is asserted, not demonstrated. The derivation of (3.4) itself is also terse—"demand consistency" hides the computation—though that is a minor issue compared to the missing correlator step. There are also small typos ("semideirect" in the abstract) that need cleaning.

I want to be fair: this is not an internally contradictory paper, and the null states are plausible. The omitted step may be routine, just long. But as it stands, the gap between the null-state algebra and the advertised KZ equations is load-bearing. The paper is a solid algebra computation plus a conjecture about its physical application.

Who should read it? Specialists in celestial amplitudes and soft symmetries. It makes a clean claim about the symmetry structure and provides new null states that might be useful. But any referee should insist on seeing the actual decoupling calculation before accepting the puzzle is solved.

Recommendation: send it to peer review. The algebra results deserve referee time, and the gap is addressable in revision. A referee should ask for the explicit derivation of the two missing KZ equations, or at minimum a clear statement that this is a conjecture rather than a demonstrated result.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper revisits the celestial holographic symmetry algebra of the MHV sector. From the mixed-helicity OPEs (2.1) and (4.1), the authors define conformally soft negative-helicity graviton operators \bar H^k and gluon operators \bar R^{k,a}, and compute in Appendices A and B the commutators of their modes with the positive-helicity w_{1+\infty}/S currents. The resulting algebra is a semidirect product of w_{1+\infty} and an infinite Abelian algebra (2.14), with the gluon analogue (4.12)-(4.14). The paper then derives KZ-type null states (3.4) and (5.2)/(C.5) involving L_{-1} descendants of negative-helicity operators and \bar H^{-3}_{5/2,-1/2} or \bar R^{-1,b}_{1,0} acting on positive-helicity operators, and claims that decoupling of these null states gives the two KZ equations missing from the previous (n-2) equations.

Significance. If the advertised application were carried out, the paper would resolve a real puzzle in celestial holography: the mismatch between n KZ equations in WZW models and (n-2) equations for MHV amplitudes. The algebra construction is explicit and internally consistent; the commutators (2.9) and (4.7) are derived from the stated OPEs rather than assumed, and the Abelian negative-helicity sector is a genuine extension of the w_{1+\infty}/S algebra. There are no fitted parameters, and the derivations in Appendices A and B are reproducible from the OPEs. The weakness is that the final step—inserting the new null states into n-point correlators and deriving differential equations—is not performed, so the central use claim is currently unsupported.

major comments (4)

[Sec. 3, Eq. (3.4)] The abstract and introduction state that the extended symmetry algebra has additional null states whose decoupling gives rise to the two missing equations, but the graviton null state (3.4) is never inserted into an n-point MHV correlator. In particular, the action of \bar H^{-3}_{5/2,-1/2} on positive-helicity hard gravitons, and more generally on the other operators in the correlator, is not written down; the same holds for the terms involving H^0 and H^1. Consequently no KZ-type differential equation is exhibited, no independence from the existing (n-2) equations of [3] is checked, and the claimed resolution of the puzzle is an assertion rather than a derivation. Please add the correlator computation or revise the claim.
[Sec. 5 and Appendix C, Eq. (C.5)] The analogous gap occurs for gluons: the null state (C.5) is derived but not used. There is no demonstration that inserting it into an n-point MHV gluon correlator yields a well-defined differential equation; the action of \bar R^{-1,b}_{1,0} on positive-helicity hard gluons is not specified. The paper therefore does not deliver the promised two missing gluon KZ equations either. This is load-bearing because the use of the extended algebra is the paper's main advertised result.
[Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.2)-(3.4)] The step from the OPE (3.2) to the null state (3.4) is labeled 'demand consistency' but no computation is shown: the expansion of the right-hand side under z_2 -> z_1 - z_{12}, \bar z_2 -> \bar z_1 - \bar z_{12}, the isolation of the \bar H^{-3}_{5/2,-1/2} mode, and the contractions with H^0 and H^1 modes are all omitted. Since the corresponding gluon derivation in Appendix C is shown in detail, the graviton case should either be supplied in the text or relegated to an appendix with full steps.
[Appendix C, Eqs. (C.4)-(C.5)] The color-index manipulation leading from (C.4) to (C.5) is not explained. In particular, the appearance of R^{1,b}_{0,0} in the second, third, and fourth terms of (C.5), and the use of the quadratic Casimir C_A, require a derivation. As written, the reader cannot verify that the claimed null state (C.5) is equivalent to (C.4).

minor comments (4)

[Abstract] There are typographical issues: 'semideirect' should be 'semidirect', and 'for sometime' should be 'for some time'.
[Sec. 2, Eq. (2.11)] The definition of w^p_m uses H^{-2p+4}_m with a single subscript, whereas the mode algebra (2.8) uses two subscripts H^k_{\alpha,m} and the current expansion (2.5) uses \bar H^k_{\alpha,m}. Please specify which index is retained in the light-transformed generators.
[Sec. 2, Eq. (2.9)] The coefficients in (2.9) and (4.7) contain factorials with potentially negative integer arguments; please state the gamma-function convention used to interpret them.
[Sec. 4, after Eq. (4.8)] The sentence 'The OPE between two negative helicity gluons does not a have pole term' contains a typo ('does not a have' should be 'does not have').

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the extended algebra is computed from external OPEs and the new null states are derived in-paper; the promised KZ equations are asserted, not derived, which is a gap rather than circularity.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The extended symmetry algebra is obtained by direct mode computation from the known mixed-helicity OPEs (2.1) and (4.1), originally from [6] (external to this author set), and the new null states (3.4) and (5.2)/(C.5) are derived in this paper by taking conformal soft limits and imposing OPE consistency. No parameter is fitted and no target result is used as an input. The paper does cite prior work by the same authors for the standard KZ mechanism and for some OPE inputs and primary conditions, but the new null-state computations are carried out here rather than quoted. The advertised 'two missing equations' are not actually derived: Sections 3 and 5 stop at the null-state identities, and the action of the negative-helicity soft modes on hard operators is never inserted into an n-point MHV correlator to produce the differential equations. That is an incompleteness or overclaim, not a circular reduction. Accordingly, the score of 2 reflects only a minor reliance on the authors' prior framework for the KZ logic, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted parameters. Its central claims rest on the imported OPEs, the assumption that conformal soft limits produce well-defined local operators with truncated mode expansions, the consistency method for null states, the Abelian nature of negative-helicity soft operators in the MHV sector, and the light-transform redefinitions. The new operators \bar H^k and \bar R^{k,a} are derived objects, but they function as new conserved quantities in the celestial CFT and are listed as invented entities with independent evidence.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The mixed helicity OPEs (2.1) and (4.1) are valid in the MHV sector of tree-level celestial amplitudes.
These OPEs are imported from [6]; the paper does not re-derive them and the entire algebra derivation rests on them.
domain assumption Conformal soft limits Δ→k with (Δ-k) prefactor yield well-defined local operators \bar H^k and \bar R^{k,a} whose mode expansions truncate in \bar z.
The existence and locality of these soft operators, and the validity of the truncated expansions (2.4)/(4.3) and (2.5)/(4.4), are assumed following [7].
ad hoc to paper Demanding consistency of the OPE after soft limits (comparing two ways of computing a correlator) yields the null-state relations.
This is the method used to obtain (3.4) and (5.2). For gravitons it is asserted in one sentence; the logic is standard in CFT but not demonstrated here.
domain assumption In the MHV sector, the OPE of two negative-helicity gravitons (or gluons) has no pole, so the corresponding algebra is Abelian.
Stated in section 2 (eq. 2.10) and section 4 (eq. 4.8), following from the known structure of MHV amplitudes.
standard math The light transform definitions (2.11)-(2.12) and (4.9)-(4.10) correctly turn the mode algebras into the semidirect product forms.
These are redefinitions of modes; the resulting commutation relations (2.14) and (4.12)-(4.14) are computed by substitution.

invented entities (2)

Conformally soft negative-helicity graviton operators \bar H^k for k=-2,-3,... independent evidence
purpose: Generate the infinite Abelian algebra that combines with w_{1+∞} into the MHV symmetry algebra; their modes appear in the new null states.
They are defined as limits of standard primary operators of the known celestial OPE, so their Ward identities can be compared with explicit amplitude computations.
Conformally soft negative-helicity gluon operators \bar R^{k,a} for k=-1,-2,... independent evidence
purpose: Generate the Abelian algebra for the gluon MHV sector and the KZ-type null states.
Defined via limits of the standard gluon primaries; their OPE coefficients are fixed by (4.1) from [6], providing a falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Holographic symmetry algebra for the MHV sector revisited." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BO7PPNWW

@misc{pith2026250802098,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Holographic symmetry algebra for the MHV sector revisited},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BO7PPNWW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.02098}
}

abstract

We revisit the holographic symmetry algebra in the MHV sector. We find an infinite dimensional Abelian symmetry algebra whose generators are the conformally soft negative helicity gravitons and gluons. So the complete symmetry algebra in the MHV graviton sector is a semideirect product of the $w_{1+\infty}$ algebra and the infinite dimensional Abelian algebra. Similarly in the MHV gluon sector the symmetry algebra is a semidirect product of the $S$ algebra and the infinite dimensional Abelian algebra. The extended symmetry algebra has some use. For example, it is known for sometime that an $n$ point MHV amplitude satisfies $(n-2)$ Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov (KZ) type equations. So two equations are missing. We show that the extended symmetry algebra has additional null states whose decoupling give rise to the two missing equations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

19 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[3]

MHV graviton scattering amplitudes and current algebra on the celestial sphere,

S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh and P. Paul, “MHV graviton scattering amplitudes and current algebra on the celestial sphere,” JHEP02 (2021), 176 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)176 [arXiv:2008.04330 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021
[1]

Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,

A. Strominger, “Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,” [arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]]. A. M. Raclariu, “Lectures on Celestial Holography,” [arXiv:2107.02075 [hep-th]]. S. Pasterski, “Lectures on celestial amplitudes,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.12, 1062 (2021) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09846-7 [arXiv:2108.04801 [hep-th]] S. Pasterski, ...

arXiv 2021
[2]

On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,

A. Strominger, ‘ ‘Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,” JHEP1407, 151 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)151 [arXiv:1308.0589 [hep-th]]. A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,” JHEP1407, 152 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)152 [arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]]. T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger, “BMS supertranslations and Wein...

arXiv 2014
[4]

Subsubleading soft graviton symmetry and MHV graviton scattering amplitudes,

S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh and S. S. Samal, “Subsubleading soft graviton symmetry and MHV graviton scattering amplitudes,” JHEP08 (2021), 067 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)067 [arXiv:2104.02546 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021
[5]

MHV gluon scattering amplitudes from celestial current algebras,

S. Banerjee and S. Ghosh, “MHV gluon scattering amplitudes from celestial current algebras,” JHEP 10 (2021), 111 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)111 [arXiv:2011.00017 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021
[6]

Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,

A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate and A. Strominger, “Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,” JHEP11 (2021), 152 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)152 [arXiv:2103.03961 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021
[7]

w(1+infinity) and the Celestial Sphere,

A. Strominger, “w(1+infinity) and the Celestial Sphere,” [arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]]. A. Strominger, “w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, no.22, 221601 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.221601

arXiv 2021
[8]

Perturbatively exact w1+∞ asymptotic symmetry of quantum self-dual gravity,

A. Ball, S. A. Narayanan, J. Salzer and A. Strominger, “Perturbatively exact w1+∞ asymptotic symmetry of quantum self-dual gravity,” JHEP01, 114 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)114 [arXiv:2111.10392 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2022

Show all 19 references

[9]

Celestialw1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,

T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma, “Celestialw1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,” SIGMA 18, 016 (2022) doi:10.3842/SIGMA.2022.016 [arXiv:2110.06066 [hep-th]]

2022 arXiv
[10]

An infinite family of w1+∞ invariant theories on the celestial sphere,

S. Banerjee, H. Kulkarni and P. Paul, “An infinite family of w1+∞ invariant theories on the celestial sphere,” JHEP05 (2023), 063 doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)063 [arXiv:2301.13225 [hep-th]]

2023 arXiv
[11]

All OPEs invariant under the infinite symmetry algebra for gluons on the celestial sphere,

S. Banerjee, R. Mandal, S. Misra, S. Panda and P. Paul, “All OPEs invariant under the infinite symmetry algebra for gluons on the celestial sphere,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.2, 026020 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.026020 [arXiv:2311.16796 [hep-th]]

2024 arXiv
[12]

Generating Hodges’ Graviton MHV Formula with an Lw1+∞ Ward Identity,

A. Guevara, E. Himwich and N. Miller, “Generating Hodges’ Graviton MHV Formula with an Lw1+∞ Ward Identity,” [arXiv:2506.05460 [hep-th]]

arXiv
[13]

Conformally Soft Photons and Gravitons,

L. Donnay, A. Puhm and A. Strominger, “Conformally Soft Photons and Gravitons,” JHEP 1901, 184 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2019)184 [arXiv:1810.05219 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[14]

Conformally Soft Theorem in Gauge Theory,

M. Pate, A. M. Raclariu and A. Strominger, “Conformally Soft Theorem in Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) no.8, 085017 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.100.085017 [arXiv:1904.10831 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[15]

Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and – 16 – Conformal Correlators,

W. Fan, A. Fotopoulos and T. R. Taylor, “Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and – 16 – Conformal Correlators,” JHEP1905, 121 (2019) doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)121 [arXiv:1903.01676 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[16]

Celestial Amplitudes: Conformal Partial Waves and Soft Limits,

D. Nandan, A. Schreiber, A. Volovich and M. Zlotnikov, “Celestial Amplitudes: Conformal Partial Waves and Soft Limits,” JHEP10 (2019), 018 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2019)018 [arXiv:1904.10940 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[17]

Celestial amplitudes and conformal soft theorems,

T. Adamo, L. Mason and A. Sharma, “Celestial amplitudes and conformal soft theorems,” Class. Quant. Grav.36 (2019) no.20, 205018 doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab42ce [arXiv:1905.09224 [hep-th]]

2019 arXiv
[18]

Conformally Soft Theorem in Gravity,

A. Puhm, “Conformally Soft Theorem in Gravity,” JHEP09 (2020), 130 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)130 [arXiv:1905.09799 [hep-th]]

2020 arXiv
[19]

Celestial OPE in self-dual gravity,

S. Banerjee, H. Kulkarni, P. Paul “Celestial OPE in self-dual gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 109, no.8, 086017 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.086017 [arXiv:2311.06485 [hep-th]]. – 17 –

2024 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [3]

MHV graviton scattering amplitudes and current algebra on the celestial sphere,

S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh and P. Paul, “MHV graviton scattering amplitudes and current algebra on the celestial sphere,” JHEP02 (2021), 176 doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2021)176 [arXiv:2008.04330 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021

[2] [1]

Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,

A. Strominger, “Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory,” [arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]]. A. M. Raclariu, “Lectures on Celestial Holography,” [arXiv:2107.02075 [hep-th]]. S. Pasterski, “Lectures on celestial amplitudes,” Eur. Phys. J. C81, no.12, 1062 (2021) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09846-7 [arXiv:2108.04801 [hep-th]] S. Pasterski, ...

arXiv 2021

[3] [2]

On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,

A. Strominger, ‘ ‘Asymptotic Symmetries of Yang-Mills Theory,” JHEP1407, 151 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)151 [arXiv:1308.0589 [hep-th]]. A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,” JHEP1407, 152 (2014) doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)152 [arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]]. T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger, “BMS supertranslations and Wein...

arXiv 2014

[4] [4]

Subsubleading soft graviton symmetry and MHV graviton scattering amplitudes,

S. Banerjee, S. Ghosh and S. S. Samal, “Subsubleading soft graviton symmetry and MHV graviton scattering amplitudes,” JHEP08 (2021), 067 doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2021)067 [arXiv:2104.02546 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021

[5] [5]

MHV gluon scattering amplitudes from celestial current algebras,

S. Banerjee and S. Ghosh, “MHV gluon scattering amplitudes from celestial current algebras,” JHEP 10 (2021), 111 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2021)111 [arXiv:2011.00017 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021

[6] [6]

Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,

A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate and A. Strominger, “Holographic symmetry algebras for gauge theory and gravity,” JHEP11 (2021), 152 doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2021)152 [arXiv:2103.03961 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2021

[7] [7]

w(1+infinity) and the Celestial Sphere,

A. Strominger, “w(1+infinity) and the Celestial Sphere,” [arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]]. A. Strominger, “w1+∞ Algebra and the Celestial Sphere: Infinite Towers of Soft Graviton, Photon, and Gluon Symmetries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.127, no.22, 221601 (2021) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.221601

arXiv 2021

[8] [8]

Perturbatively exact w1+∞ asymptotic symmetry of quantum self-dual gravity,

A. Ball, S. A. Narayanan, J. Salzer and A. Strominger, “Perturbatively exact w1+∞ asymptotic symmetry of quantum self-dual gravity,” JHEP01, 114 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)114 [arXiv:2111.10392 [hep-th]]

arXiv 2022