pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.02434 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-04 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA· physics.comp-ph

Numerical Homogenization of Landau-Lifshitz Equation with Rough Coefficients

Zetao Ma , Jingrun Chen , Rui Du , Lei Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 01:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NAphysics.comp-ph
keywords numerical homogenizationLandau-Lifshitz equationrough coefficientsmultiscale problemsGeneralized Rough Polyharmonic Splinesmagnetic systemscoarse-scale approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Localized basis functions from energy minimization enable accurate coarse-mesh simulation of the fully nonlinear Landau-Lifshitz equation with rough coefficients.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a numerical homogenization method for the Landau-Lifshitz equation when its coefficients are rough, non-periodic, and contain nonseparable scales. Direct resolution on fine meshes is computationally prohibitive, so the work constructs localized basis functions through energy minimization inside the Generalized Rough Polyharmonic Splines framework. Several variational formulations are introduced to handle the equation's nonlinear, vectorial, and non-symmetric character. Systematic tests show that the resulting coarse-scale approximations deliver large savings in cost while preserving accuracy for multiscale magnetic systems.

Core claim

We develop a numerical homogenization approach for the fully nonlinear Landau-Lifshitz equation with rough coefficients, including non-periodicity and nonseparable scales, by constructing localized basis functions derived from energy minimization within the Generalized Rough Polyharmonic Splines framework; these bases preserve critical multiscale features and operate on a computationally tractable coarse mesh through several tailored variational formulations.

What carries the argument

Generalized Rough Polyharmonic Splines (GRPS) localized basis functions obtained from energy minimization in problem-specific variational formulations that capture the nonlinear and vectorial structure

If this is right

  • The method produces accurate solutions for the Landau-Lifshitz dynamics at substantially lower computational cost than fine-mesh discretization.
  • It extends numerical homogenization to fully nonlinear, non-symmetric, vector-valued problems with non-periodic rough coefficients.
  • The same construction supplies a robust framework for simulating magnetic systems that contain complex microstructures.
  • Several variational formulations can be chosen according to the dominant structural features of the target equation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same energy-minimization principle for basis construction might transfer to other nonlinear evolution equations whose coefficients vary on multiple unresolved scales.
  • One could test whether the approach remains stable when the rough coefficients are also time-dependent or when the simulation domain is three-dimensional.
  • The framework suggests that variational principles can generate effective coarse bases even for operators that lack symmetry or self-adjointness.

Load-bearing premise

Energy-minimization-based localized basis functions constructed for specific variational formulations will preserve the essential multiscale features of the nonlinear, vectorial, non-symmetric Landau-Lifshitz dynamics on coarse meshes.

What would settle it

A side-by-side computation in which the coarse-mesh solution using the constructed bases deviates by more than a small fixed tolerance from a reference fine-mesh solution for a coefficient field that is both rough and non-periodic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.02434 by Jingrun Chen, Lei Zhang, Rui Du, Zetao Ma.

Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1. Figure 3.1: GRPS-E and GRPS-V basis functions obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3.2
Figure 3.2. Figure 3.2: Exponential decay measured by ||ψi−ψ l i ||/||ψi || in L 2 , H1 , and L ∞ norms for localization levels l =2,··· ,8 (log10 scale). 3.2 Multiscale Algorithms for Landau-Lifshitz Equation With the coarse approximation space established, we now develop two distinct numerical approaches for solving the LL equation (2.2). The magnetization field m in micromagnet￾ics must theoretically satisfy the constraint |… view at source ↗
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.1. Figure 4.1: shows its highly oscillatory profile [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4.2
Figure 4.2. Figure 4.2: Performance of GRPS-E and GRPS-V multiscale bas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we develop a numerical homogenization approach for the fully nonlinear Landau-Lifshitz equation with rough coefficients, including non-periodicity and nonseparable scales. Direct numerical resolution of such multiscale problems on fine meshes incurs prohibitive computational costs. To address this challenge, we propose an efficient coarse scale approximation through localized basis functions derived from energy minimization within the Generalized Rough Polyharmonic Splines (GRPS) framework. These basis functions preserve critical multiscale features while operating on a computationally tractable coarse mesh. The nonlinear, vectorial, and non-symmetric nature of the Landau-Lifshitz equation necessitates careful design of variational formulations for basis construction. We introduce several such formulations, each tailored to specific structural aspects of the problem. Through systematic numerical experiments, we demonstrate that our approach achieves significant computational savings without compromising accuracy, offering a robust framework for simulating multiscale magnetic systems with complex microstructures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a numerical homogenization method for the fully nonlinear Landau-Lifshitz equation with rough, non-periodic coefficients. Localized basis functions are constructed via energy minimization inside the Generalized Rough Polyharmonic Splines (GRPS) framework, with several variational formulations tailored to the vectorial and non-symmetric structure. The central claim is that these bases, when used on a coarse mesh, preserve essential multiscale features of the LL dynamics and deliver substantial computational savings while maintaining accuracy, as shown by systematic numerical experiments.

Significance. If the numerical evidence can be strengthened with quantitative error controls and if the bases are shown to respect the skew-symmetric cross-product term and unit-length constraint, the work would offer a practical route to coarse-scale simulation of multiscale micromagnetics problems that are currently intractable on fine meshes. The extension of GRPS-style energy-minimizing bases to a fully nonlinear, non-symmetric evolution equation is a non-trivial step beyond linear elliptic homogenization.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical experiments (throughout)] The abstract states that systematic numerical experiments demonstrate accuracy and savings, yet no quantitative error bounds, convergence rates, or details on how the nonlinear solver interacts with the coarse basis are supplied. Without these controls it is impossible to verify that the claimed accuracy holds for the fully nonlinear dynamics rather than for a linearized proxy.
  2. [Basis-construction section (variational formulations)] The variational problems used to generate the GRPS bases target symmetric quadratic energies. It is not shown that these constructions automatically reproduce the correct effective precession and damping arising from the skew term m × (div(a(x)∇m)) and the algebraic constraint |m|=1 when the bases are inserted into the coarse-scale LL evolution. A concrete test (e.g., comparison of effective torque or energy dissipation on a simple periodic test case) is needed to confirm structural fidelity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and §2] Notation for the coarse-scale LL operator and the precise definition of the localized basis functions should be introduced earlier and used consistently.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state mesh sizes, number of basis functions per coarse element, and the precise error measure plotted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment in detail below and indicate the revisions we will incorporate to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical experiments (throughout)] The abstract states that systematic numerical experiments demonstrate accuracy and savings, yet no quantitative error bounds, convergence rates, or details on how the nonlinear solver interacts with the coarse basis are supplied. Without these controls it is impossible to verify that the claimed accuracy holds for the fully nonlinear dynamics rather than for a linearized proxy.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this gap in quantitative controls. The existing experiments compare coarse-scale solutions against fine-scale references on several rough-coefficient test problems and report wall-clock savings, but we agree that explicit error tables, observed convergence rates, and solver details are not supplied. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection with L2 and energy-norm error tables versus coarse-mesh size, together with the measured convergence rates. We will also document the nonlinear solver (implicit midpoint time stepping with fixed-point iteration on the sphere constraint and the precise tolerance used). These additions will directly address verification for the fully nonlinear dynamics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Basis-construction section (variational formulations)] The variational problems used to generate the GRPS bases target symmetric quadratic energies. It is not shown that these constructions automatically reproduce the correct effective precession and damping arising from the skew term m × (div(a(x)∇m)) and the algebraic constraint |m|=1 when the bases are inserted into the coarse-scale LL evolution. A concrete test (e.g., comparison of effective torque or energy dissipation on a simple periodic test case) is needed to confirm structural fidelity.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of structural fidelity for the skew-symmetric and constraint terms is desirable. The GRPS bases are constructed from the symmetric energy-minimization problem associated with the diffusion operator, which is the source of the multiscale roughness; the skew term and unit-length constraint are then imposed at the coarse level through the variational form of the LL equation and a structure-preserving integrator. To provide the requested concrete evidence, we will insert a new numerical example on a simple periodic coefficient. In this test we will extract and compare the effective precession frequency and dissipation rate between the fine-scale reference and the coarse GRPS model, thereby confirming that the essential torque and damping behavior are retained. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct constructive method via energy-minimizing bases

full rationale

The paper presents a numerical homogenization method that constructs localized basis functions through energy minimization in tailored variational formulations of the GRPS framework, then applies them to the nonlinear Landau-Lifshitz equation on coarse meshes. This is a direct construction whose validity is assessed by separate numerical experiments rather than by any reported prediction that reduces to a fitted parameter or input by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes from prior author work are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided description, and the central claim does not rename a known result or smuggle in assumptions via citation. The approach remains self-contained as a standard variational construction for multiscale problems.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on the existence of suitable energy-minimizing localized bases that capture the multiscale features of the LL equation; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract, but the construction implicitly assumes that the chosen variational problems are well-posed for the non-symmetric operator.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Energy minimization within the GRPS framework produces basis functions that preserve critical multiscale features of the nonlinear Landau-Lifshitz dynamics.
    Invoked as the justification for using the coarse-scale approximation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5690 in / 1284 out tokens · 30016 ms · 2026-05-19T01:15:17.625294+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Analysis of the finite e lement heterogeneous multi- scale method for quasilinear elliptic homogenization prob lems

    Assyr Abdulle and Gilles Vilmart. Analysis of the finite e lement heterogeneous multi- scale method for quasilinear elliptic homogenization prob lems. Mathematics of Computation , 83(286):513–536, 2014. 19

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    A multiscale finite element method for numerical ho- mogenization

    Gr´ egoire Allaire and Robert Brizzi. A multiscale finite element method for numerical ho- mogenization. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation , 4(3):790–812, 2005

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    A new finite element scheme for Landau- Lifchitz equations

    Francois Alouges. A new finite element scheme for Landau- Lifchitz equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S , 1(2):187–196, 2008

    work page 2008

  4. [4]

    Stochastic homogeniza- tion of the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation

    Francois Alouges, Anne De Bouard, Benoit Merlet, and Lea Nicolas. Stochastic homogeniza- tion of the Landau–Lifshitz–Gilbert equation. Stochastics and Partial Differential Equations: Analysis and Computations , 9:789–818, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Homogenizatio n of composite ferromagnetic materials

    Francois Alouges and Giovanni Di Fratta. Homogenizatio n of composite ferromagnetic materials. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 471(2182):20150365, 2015

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Numerical homogenization be- yond scale separation

    Robert Altmann, Patrick Henning, and Daniel Peterseim. Numerical homogenization be- yond scale separation. Acta Numerica, 30:1–86, 2021

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Analysis of backward Euler projec tion FEM for the Landau– Lifshitz equation

    Rong An and W eiwei Sun. Analysis of backward Euler projec tion FEM for the Landau– Lifshitz equation. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 42(3):2336–2360, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Analysis of a two-scale, locally conserv ative subgrid upscaling for elliptic problems

    T odd Arbogast. Analysis of a two-scale, locally conserv ative subgrid upscaling for elliptic problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 42(2):576–598, 2004

    work page 2004

  9. [9]

    V ariational multi- scale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows

    Y Bazilevs, VM Calo, JA Cottrell, TJR Hughes, A Reali, and G Scovazzi. V ariational multi- scale residual-based turbulence modeling for large eddy simulation of incompressible flows. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , 197(1):173–201, 2007

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Introduction to the network approximation method for materials modeling

    Leonid Berlyand, Alexander G Kolpakov , and Alexei Novi kov . Introduction to the network approximation method for materials modeling . Number 148 in Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, 2013

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Flux norm approach t o finite dimensional homog- enization approximations with non-separated scales and hi gh contrast

    Leonid Berlyand and Houman Owhadi. Flux norm approach t o finite dimensional homog- enization approximations with non-separated scales and hi gh contrast. Archive for rational mechanics and analysis, 198(2):677–721, 2010

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Super-localized orthogonal de- composition for convection-dominated diffusion problems

    Francesca Bonizzoni, Philip Freese, and Daniel Peters eim. Super-localized orthogonal de- composition for convection-dominated diffusion problems . BIT Numerical Mathematics , 64(3):33, 2024

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    A reduced basis super-localized orthogonal decomposition for reaction-convection-diffu sion problems

    Francesca Bonizzoni, Moritz Hauck, and Daniel Peterse im. A reduced basis super-localized orthogonal decomposition for reaction-convection-diffu sion problems. Journal of Computa- tional Physics, 499:112698, 2024

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    A second-order numerical method for Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with large da mping parameters

    Y ongyong Cai, Jingrun Chen, Cheng W ang, and Changjian X ie. A second-order numerical method for Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with large da mping parameters. Journal of Computational Physics, 451:110831, 2022

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Numerical micromagnetics: a review

    Carlos J Garc´ ıa Cervera. Numerical micromagnetics: a review . SeMA Journal: Bolet´ ın de la Sociedad Espa ˜ nola de Matem´ atica Aplicada, (39):103–135, 2007

    work page 2007

  16. [16]

    On the Multiscale Landau– Lifshitz–Gilbert Equation: Two-Scale Convergence and Sta bility Analysis

    Jingrun Chen, Rui Du, Zetao Ma, Zhiwei Sun, and Lei Zhang . On the Multiscale Landau– Lifshitz–Gilbert Equation: Two-Scale Convergence and Sta bility Analysis. Multiscale Model- ing & Simulation , 20(2):835–856, 2022

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Second order elliptic equations and elliptic systems , volume

    Y a-Zhe Chen and Lan-Cheng Wu. Second order elliptic equations and elliptic systems , volume

    work page

  18. [18]

    American Mathematical Soc., 1998

    work page 1998

  19. [19]

    Homogenization of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation in a contrasted composi te medium

    Catherine Choquet, Mohammed Moumni, and Mouhcine Tili oua. Homogenization of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation in a contrasted composi te medium. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems-S, 11(1):35, 2018

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Resi dual-driven online generalized multiscale finite element methods

    Eric T Chung, Y alchin Efendiev , and Wing T at Leung. Resi dual-driven online generalized multiscale finite element methods. Journal of Computational Physics , 302:176–190, 2015

    work page 2015

  21. [21]

    An ad aptive generalized multiscale 20 discontinuous galerkin method for high-contrast flow probl ems

    Eric T Chung, Y alchin Efendiev , and Wing T at Leung. An ad aptive generalized multiscale 20 discontinuous galerkin method for high-contrast flow probl ems. Multiscale Modeling & Sim- ulation, 16(3):1227–1257, 2018

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    An ada ptive GMsFEM for high-contrast flow problems

    Eric T Chung, Y alchin Efendiev , and Guanglian Li. An ada ptive GMsFEM for high-contrast flow problems. Journal of Computational Physics , 273:54–76, 2014

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Error estimates for a semi-implicit nume rical scheme solving the Landau– Lifshitz equation with an exchange field

    Ivan Cimr´ ak. Error estimates for a semi-implicit nume rical scheme solving the Landau– Lifshitz equation with an exchange field. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 25(3):611–634, 2005

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    A survey on the numerics and computations for the landau-lifshitz equation of micromagnetism

    Ivan Cimr´ ak. A survey on the numerics and computations for the landau-lifshitz equation of micromagnetism. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering , 15(3):1–37, 2007

    work page 2007

  25. [25]

    Linear second-order IMEX-type integrator for th e (eddy current) Landau–Lifshitz– Gilbert equation

    Giovanni Di Fratta, Carl-Martin Pfeiler, Dirk Praetor ius, Michele Ruggeri, and Bernhard Stiftner. Linear second-order IMEX-type integrator for th e (eddy current) Landau–Lifshitz– Gilbert equation. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 40(4):2802–2838, 2020

    work page 2020

  26. [26]

    A two level approach for sim- ulating Bose-Einstein condensates by localized orthogona l decomposition

    Christian D ¨ oding, Patrick Henning, and Johan W¨ arnegard. A two level approach for sim- ulating Bose-Einstein condensates by localized orthogona l decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.07392, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  27. [27]

    Numerical calculation of equivalen t grid block permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media

    Louis J Durlofsky . Numerical calculation of equivalen t grid block permeability tensors for heterogeneous porous media. Water resources research, 27(5):699–708, 1991

    work page 1991

  28. [28]

    The heterognous multiscal e methods

    W einan E and Bjorn Engquist. The heterognous multiscal e methods. Communications in Mathematical Sciences, 1(1):87–132, 2003

    work page 2003

  29. [29]

    Analysis of the heterogeneous multiscale method for elliptic homogenization problems

    W einan E, Pingbing Ming, and Pingwen Zhang. Analysis of the heterogeneous multiscale method for elliptic homogenization problems. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 18(1):121–156, 2005

    work page 2005

  30. [30]

    Genera lized multiscale finite element methods (GMsFEM)

    Y alchin Efendiev , Juan Galvis, and Thomas Y Hou. Genera lized multiscale finite element methods (GMsFEM). Journal of Computational Physics , 251:116–135, 2013

    work page 2013

  31. [31]

    Multis cale finite element methods for high-contrast problems using local spectral basis functio ns

    Y alchin Efendiev , Juan Galvis, and Xiao-Hui Wu. Multis cale finite element methods for high-contrast problems using local spectral basis functio ns. Journal of Computational Physics , 230(4):937–955, 2011

    work page 2011

  32. [32]

    Multiscale finite element methods: theory and applications , volume 4

    Y alchin Efendiev and Thomas Y Hou. Multiscale finite element methods: theory and applications , volume 4. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009

    work page 2009

  33. [33]

    Computational mul- tiscale methods for nondivergence-form elliptic partial d ifferential equations

    Philip Freese, Dietmar Gallistl, Daniel Peterseim, an d Timo Sprekeler. Computational mul- tiscale methods for nondivergence-form elliptic partial d ifferential equations. Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics , 24(3):649–672, 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Numerical homogenization of h(curl)-problems

    Dietmar Gallistl, Patrick Henning, and Barbara V erf ¨ u rth. Numerical homogenization of h(curl)-problems. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 56(3):1570–1596, 2018

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Optimal error estimates of a linearized ba ckward Euler FEM for the Landau– Lifshitz equation

    Huadong Gao. Optimal error estimates of a linearized ba ckward Euler FEM for the Landau– Lifshitz equation. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 52(5):2574–2593, 2014

    work page 2014

  36. [36]

    A Lagrangian formulation of the gyrom agnetic equation of the magneti- zation field

    Thomas L Gilbert. A Lagrangian formulation of the gyrom agnetic equation of the magneti- zation field. Phys. Rev., 100:1243–1255, 1955

    work page 1955

  37. [37]

    Magnetic materials and devices for the 21st century: st ronger, lighter, and more energy efficient

    Oliver Gutfleisch, Matthew A Willard, Ekkes Br ¨ uck, Christina H Chen, SG Sankar, and J Ping Liu. Magnetic materials and devices for the 21st century: st ronger, lighter, and more energy efficient. Advanced materials, 23(7):821–842, 2011

    work page 2011

  38. [38]

    Super-localizatio n of elliptic multiscale problems

    Moritz Hauck and Daniel Peterseim. Super-localizatio n of elliptic multiscale problems. Mathematics of Computation , 92(341):981–1003, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Computational homog enization of time-harmonic Maxwell’s equations

    Patrick Henning and Anna Persson. Computational homog enization of time-harmonic Maxwell’s equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing , 42(3):B581–B607, 2020

    work page 2020

  40. [40]

    Superconvergence of time invariants for the Gross– Pitaevskii equation

    Patrick Henning and Johan W¨ arnegard. Superconvergence of time invariants for the Gross– Pitaevskii equation. Mathematics of Computation , 91(334):509–555, 2022. 21

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    The varia- tional multiscale method—a paradigm for computational mec hanics

    Thomas JR Hughes, Gonzalo R Feij ´ oo, Luca Mazzei, and Je an-Baptiste Quincy . The varia- tional multiscale method—a paradigm for computational mec hanics. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering , 166(1-2):3–24, 1998

    work page 1998

  42. [42]

    Homogenization of differential operators and integral functionals

    V asili V asilievitch Jikov , Sergei M Kozlov , and Olga Arsenievna Oleinik. Homogenization of differential operators and integral functionals . Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    work page 2012

  43. [43]

    Recent developments i n the modeling, analysis, and numerics of ferromagnetism

    Martin Kruzik and Andreas Prohl. Recent developments i n the modeling, analysis, and numerics of ferromagnetism. SIAM review, 48(3):439–483, 2006

    work page 2006

  44. [44]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz. On the theory of the dispe rsion of magetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys. Z. Sowjetunion , 8:153–169, 1935

    work page 1935

  45. [45]

    Analysis and numerical methods for multiscale problems in m agnetization dy- namics

    Lena Leitenmaier. Analysis and numerical methods for multiscale problems in m agnetization dy- namics. PhD thesis, KTH Royal Institute of T echnology , 2021

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    A finite element b ased Heterogeneous Multiscale Method for the Landau-Lifshitz equation

    Lena Leitenmaier and Murtazo Nazarov . A finite element b ased Heterogeneous Multiscale Method for the Landau-Lifshitz equation. Journal of Computational Physics , 486:112112, 2023

    work page 2023

  47. [47]

    Heterogeneous Mult iscale Methods for the Landau– Lifshitz Equation

    Lena Leitenmaier and Olof Runborg. Heterogeneous Mult iscale Methods for the Landau– Lifshitz Equation. Journal of Scientific Computing , 93(3):76, 2022

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    On homogenization o f the Landau–Lifshitz equa- tion with rapidly oscillating material coefficient

    Lena Leitenmaier and Olof Runborg. On homogenization o f the Landau–Lifshitz equa- tion with rapidly oscillating material coefficient. Communications in Mathematical Sciences , 20(3):653–694, 2022

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Upscaling Errors in Heterogeneous Multiscale Meth- ods for the Landau–Lifshitz Equation

    Lena Leitenmaier and Olof Runborg. Upscaling Errors in Heterogeneous Multiscale Meth- ods for the Landau–Lifshitz Equation. Multiscale Modeling & Simulation , 20(1):1–35, 2022

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Iterated numer ical homogenization for multiscale elliptic equations with monotone nonlinearity

    Xinliang Liu, Eric Chung, and Lei Zhang. Iterated numer ical homogenization for multiscale elliptic equations with monotone nonlinearity . Multiscale Modeling & Simulation , 19(4):1601– 1632, 2021

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Generalized Rough Polyharmonic Splines for Multiscale PDEs with Rough Coefficients

    Xinliang Liu, Lei Zhang, and Shengxin Zhu. Generalized Rough Polyharmonic Splines for Multiscale PDEs with Rough Coefficients. Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Appli- cations, 14(4):862–892, 2021

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Novel des ign and analysis of generalized finite element methods based on locally optimal spectral app roximations

    Chupeng Ma, Robert Scheichl, and Tim Dodwell. Novel des ign and analysis of generalized finite element methods based on locally optimal spectral app roximations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 60(1):244–273, 2022

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Multiscale scatte ring in nonlinear Kerr-type media

    Roland Maier and Barbara V erf ¨ urth. Multiscale scatte ring in nonlinear Kerr-type media. Mathematics of Computation , 91(336):1655–1685, 2022

    work page 2022

  54. [54]

    Localization of elliptic multiscale problems

    Axel M¨ alqvist and Daniel Peterseim. Localization of elliptic multiscale problems. Mathemat- ics of Computation , 83(290):2583–2603, 2014

    work page 2014

  55. [55]

    Multigrid with rough coefficients and mu ltiresolution operator decom- position from hierarchical information games

    Houman Owhadi. Multigrid with rough coefficients and mu ltiresolution operator decom- position from hierarchical information games. Siam Review, 59(1):99–149, 2017

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Homogenization of parabol ic equations with a continuum of space and time scales

    Houman Owhadi and Lei Zhang. Homogenization of parabol ic equations with a continuum of space and time scales. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis , 46(1):1–36, 2008

    work page 2008

  57. [57]

    Localized bases for finite- dimensional homogenization approximations with nonseparated scales and high contrast

    Houman Owhadi and Lei Zhang. Localized bases for finite- dimensional homogenization approximations with nonseparated scales and high contrast . Multiscale Modeling & Simula- tion, 9(4):1373–1398, 2011

    work page 2011

  58. [58]

    Gamblets for opening the co mplexity-bottleneck of im- plicit schemes for hyperbolic and parabolic odes/pdes with rough coefficients

    Houman Owhadi and Lei Zhang. Gamblets for opening the co mplexity-bottleneck of im- plicit schemes for hyperbolic and parabolic odes/pdes with rough coefficients. Journal of Computational Physics, 347:99–128, 2017

    work page 2017

  59. [59]

    Polyhar monic homogenization, rough polyharmonic splines and sparse super-localization

    Houman Owhadi, Lei Zhang, and Leonid Berlyand. Polyhar monic homogenization, rough polyharmonic splines and sparse super-localization. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Nu- merical Analysis, 48(2):517–552, 2014

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Asymptotic analysis for periodic struc- 22 tures

    George Papanicolau, Alain Bensoussan, and J-L Lions. Asymptotic analysis for periodic struc- 22 tures. Elsevier, 1978

    work page 1978

  61. [61]

    Convergence of an implicit–explicit midpoint scheme for computational micromagnetics

    Dirk Praetorius, Michele Ruggeri, and Bernhard Stiftn er. Convergence of an implicit–explicit midpoint scheme for computational micromagnetics. Computers & Mathematics with Applica- tions, 75(5):1719–1738, 2018

    work page 2018

  62. [62]

    Computational micromagnetism

    Andreas Prohl et al. Computational micromagnetism. Springer, 2001

    work page 2001

  63. [63]

    Homogenization of ferromagnetic multilayers in the presence of surface energies

    K´ evin Santugini-Repiquet. Homogenization of ferromagnetic multilayers in the presence of surface energies. ESAIM: Control, Optimisation and Calculus of Variations, 13(2):305–330, 2007

    work page 2007

  64. [64]

    Numerical homogenization for nonl inear strongly monotone problems

    Barbara V erf ¨ urth. Numerical homogenization for nonl inear strongly monotone problems. IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis , 42(2):1313–1338, 2022

    work page 2022

  65. [65]

    Analys is of upscaling absolute perme- ability .Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B , 2(2):185–204, 2002

    Xiao-Hui Wu, Y alchin Efendiev , and Thomas Y Hou. Analys is of upscaling absolute perme- ability .Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series B , 2(2):185–204, 2002

    work page 2002

  66. [66]

    Second-order semi-implicit projection methods for microm agnetics simulations

    Changjian Xie, Carlos J Garc´ ıa-Cervera, Cheng W ang, Z hennan Zhou, and Jingrun Chen. Second-order semi-implicit projection methods for microm agnetics simulations. Journal of Computational Physics, 404:109104, 2020. 6 Appendix 6.1 V arious Time Discretization Schemes Prohl’s method The fully implicit scheme proposed by Prohl [ 61] ensures numerical sta...

    work page 2020