Measured dynamics of an XXZ quantum simulator in a highly symmetrical double-ringed geometry

D. J. Papoular

arxiv: 2508.02468 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-04 · 🪐 quant-ph

Measured dynamics of an XXZ quantum simulator in a highly symmetrical double-ringed geometry

D. J. Papoular This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 00:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph

keywords XXZ modelquantum simulatorspatial symmetriesdouble-ring geometryspin measurementspoint group symmetryHeisenberg Hamiltonianstate collapse

0 comments

The pith

Symmetries dictate the time dependence of spin measurement probabilities and the number of distinct outcomes in a small XXZ quantum simulator.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines a system of six to twelve effective spins arranged in a double-ring geometry that possesses D_nh point-group symmetry. Particles interact via the XXZ or Heisenberg Hamiltonian and begin in a fully symmetric, sitewise-factorized initial state. After evolution, the z-components of all spins are measured. The authors show that the spatial symmetries together with a twofold rotation of all spins fix both the qualitative shape of the probability curves versus time and the exact count of measurement outcomes that carry different probabilities. This constraint also opens a route to observing the collapse of the initial state in larger systems using the simplest possible measurement scheme.

Core claim

In a planar double-ring trap with point-group symmetry D_nh holding N = 2n = 6 to 12 particles, an initial state that is sitewise-factorized and invariant under all spatial symmetries evolves under the XXZ or Heisenberg Hamiltonian; after a chosen time the z-components of all spins are measured. The spatial symmetries and the twofold rotation of every spin together fix the qualitative time dependence of the resulting measurement probabilities and determine how many distinct probability values appear among the possible outcomes. In larger systems the same protocol can reveal the collapse of the initial symmetric state.

What carries the argument

The D_nh point-group symmetry of the double-ring geometry combined with the invariance of the initial state under all spatial symmetries and the twofold rotation symmetry of all spins.

Load-bearing premise

The initial state must be sitewise-factorized and fully invariant under every spatial symmetry of the double-ring geometry.

What would settle it

Performing the z-component measurements on the evolved state and finding either a larger number of distinct probability values than the symmetry group predicts or a time dependence of those probabilities that violates the expected qualitative pattern would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.02468 by D. J. Papoular.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Probabilities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We theoretically identify observable consequences of spatial and spin symmetries on the dynamics of a small XXZ quantum simulator. Our proposed protocol relies on the choice of suitable initial states, and involves the measurement scheme whose experimental implementation is the simplest. We analyze a system of $N=2n=6$ to $12$ particles, trapped in a planar geometry comprised of two rings which exhibits point group symmetry $D_{nh}$. The particles represent effective spins whose interaction is described by the XXZ or Heisenberg Hamiltonian. The system is prepared in an initial state which is sitewise-factorized and invariant under all spatial symmetries, it evolves for a given time, after which the $z$-components of all $N$ spins are measured. We show that symmetries dictate (i) the qualitative behaviour of the measurement probabilities as a function of the evolution time, and (ii) the number of measurement results with different probabilities. We highlight the role of a twofold rotation of all spins. We also demonstrate that, in larger systems, the collapse of the initial state may be observed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Symmetries in this double-ring XXZ setup force degeneracies in z-measurement probabilities and control their time evolution from a symmetric product initial state.

read the letter

The punchline is that this paper uses point-group symmetries to predict that z-measurement probabilities in a small double-ring XXZ spin chain will show degeneracies and specific time dependence when starting from a symmetric product state. What stands out is the concrete protocol: prepare N=6-12 particles in two rings with D_nh symmetry, use an initial state that factors site by site and stays invariant under all rotations and reflections plus the twofold spin rotation, evolve with the XXZ Hamiltonian, then measure all z spins. The symmetries keep the evolution in the totally symmetric sector, so probabilities are equal for symmetry-related configurations. This directly gives fewer distinct probability values and constrains their dynamics through the matrix elements in that subspace. The twofold spin rotation plays a key role in the spin part. The paper does this well by focusing on an experimentally simple measurement scheme and showing how it reveals symmetry effects. For experimental design in trapped particle systems, this could be handy to test if the setup respects the expected symmetries or to reduce the data one needs to analyze. The main soft spot is the reliance on that very specific initial state. If the preparation has any imperfections or the state isn't perfectly factorized and symmetric, the predicted degeneracies won't hold exactly. The abstract mentions demonstrating observation of initial state collapse in larger systems, but this seems like it might require more explanation or numerics to be convincing, especially since the system size is still small. Without seeing the full derivations or any checks, it's hard to gauge how sensitive the results are to small perturbations. Overall, this is for researchers working on small-scale quantum simulators with symmetric geometries, like in ion traps or optical lattices. A reader interested in symmetry-protected dynamics or practical measurement protocols in few-body systems would get something out of it. It doesn't tackle open problems in many-body physics but offers a targeted tool. I think it deserves peer review. The symmetry arguments are standard and reliable here, and the proposal is clear enough that referees could check the details and suggest improvements if needed.

Referee Report

1 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the dynamics of an XXZ (or Heisenberg) quantum simulator with N=6–12 spins in a double-ring planar geometry possessing D_nh point-group symmetry. The system is initialized in a sitewise-factorized state invariant under all spatial symmetries and evolves under the XXZ Hamiltonian; after evolution the z-components of all spins are measured. The central claim is that the combined spatial and spin symmetries (including a twofold rotation of all spins) force the measurement probabilities to be constant on symmetry orbits, thereby dictating their qualitative time dependence and reducing the number of distinct probability values. The authors also discuss the observation of initial-state collapse in larger systems.

Significance. If the symmetry-based predictions hold, the work supplies a parameter-free route to forecasting the structure of measurement statistics in symmetric quantum simulators without requiring full diagonalization of the Hamiltonian. This is valuable for experimental design in platforms where D_nh geometries can be engineered, and the emphasis on the simplest measurement scheme (projective z-measurements) enhances practical relevance. The explicit treatment of the twofold spin rotation as an additional symmetry is a useful technical contribution.

major comments (1)

[§3] §3 (Evolution operator and symmetric subspace): the argument that the initial state remains entirely within the totally symmetric sector under the combined D_nh × ℤ₂ spin-rotation group relies on the commutation of the twofold spin rotation with the XXZ Hamiltonian; this commutation is asserted but the explicit verification for the anisotropic case (Δ ≠ 1) is not shown, which is load-bearing for the claim that all matrix elements outside the symmetric subspace vanish.

minor comments (3)

[Figure 2] Figure 2: the labeling of the distinct probability classes (orbits) is not cross-referenced to the explicit symmetry operations listed in Table 1, making it difficult to verify that all listed configurations are indeed inequivalent under D_nh.
[Discussion] The statement that 'the collapse of the initial state may be observed' in larger systems (final paragraph) is presented without a quantitative estimate of the required system size or evolution time; a brief scaling argument or numerical example would strengthen the claim.
[§2] Notation: the symbol for the twofold spin rotation operator is introduced only in the text and not defined in the preliminary section on symmetries; adding an equation label would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their positive evaluation and constructive recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested clarification.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Evolution operator and symmetric subspace): the argument that the initial state remains entirely within the totally symmetric sector under the combined D_nh × ℤ₂ spin-rotation group relies on the commutation of the twofold spin rotation with the XXZ Hamiltonian; this commutation is asserted but the explicit verification for the anisotropic case (Δ ≠ 1) is not shown, which is load-bearing for the claim that all matrix elements outside the symmetric subspace vanish.

Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. We agree that an explicit verification strengthens the argument. In the revised manuscript we will add a short calculation in §3: let R be the twofold spin-rotation operator satisfying R S^x_k R^{-1} = −S^x_k, R S^y_k R^{-1} = −S^y_k and R S^z_k R^{-1} = S^z_k for each site k. Each XX, YY and ZZ term in the XXZ Hamiltonian is invariant under conjugation by R, so [R, H_XXZ] = 0 holds for arbitrary anisotropy Δ. Consequently the initial state, an eigenstate of R with eigenvalue +1, evolves entirely within the symmetric subspace, confirming that matrix elements outside this sector vanish. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from symmetries

full rationale

The paper derives its claims directly from the invariance of the XXZ Hamiltonian and the sitewise-factorized, fully symmetric initial state under the D_nh point group plus spin rotation. The time-evolved state stays in the totally symmetric sector, so z-measurement probabilities are constant on symmetry orbits and exhibit the stated time dependence via matrix elements within that subspace. This follows from standard quantum mechanics and representation theory with no reduction to fitted parameters, self-citations, or ansatzes; the argument is independent and externally verifiable against group theory.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard quantum mechanics and representation theory of the D_nh point group applied to the XXZ Hamiltonian; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc assumptions are evident from the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The XXZ or Heisenberg Hamiltonian governs the spin interactions in the double-ring geometry.
Invoked as the interaction model for the effective spins.
domain assumption The initial state is invariant under the full D_nh point group and is sitewise factorized.
Central premise for the symmetry-based predictions on measurement probabilities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1369 out tokens · 62952 ms · 2026-05-19T00:47:21.831515+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We show that symmetries dictate (i) the qualitative behaviour of the measurement probabilities as a function of the evolution time, and (ii) the number of measurement results with different probabilities.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

[1]

(2) /u1D440 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 /u1D451 (± /u1D440 ) 1 12 66 220 495 792 924 /u1D6FF0[/u1D712 ( /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 90 /u1D6FF0[/u1D709(± /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 48 TABLE I

To summarize: /u1D43AH = /u1D437 spatial 6ℎ × /u1D43Espin ℎ and /u1D43AXXZ = /u1D437 spatial 6ℎ × /u1D437 spin ∞ ℎ . (2) /u1D440 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 /u1D451 (± /u1D440 ) 1 12 66 220 495 792 924 /u1D6FF0[/u1D712 ( /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 90 /u1D6FF0[/u1D709(± /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 48 TABLE I. Dimensions of the subspaces  ( /u1D440 ) ,  0[/u1D712 ( /u1D...

work page
[2]

Subsequently, two conﬁgurations dominate: /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 0 ⟩ and its spin–ﬂipped conﬁguration /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 923⟩

05ℎ∕/u1D43D. Subsequently, two conﬁgurations dominate: /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 0 ⟩ and its spin–ﬂipped conﬁguration /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 923⟩. Their probabili- ties evolve aperiodically, reaching values ≲ 0. 15. All other /u1D45D(0) /u1D453 ( /u1D461) ≤ 0. 035. The dominance of /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 0 ⟩ and /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 923⟩ is itself a signat...

work page
[3]

Tinkham, Group theory and quantum mechanics (McGraw- Hill (New York), 1964)

M. Tinkham, Group theory and quantum mechanics (McGraw- Hill (New York), 1964)

work page 1964
[4]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Saunders (New York), 1976)

work page 1976
[5]

F. W. Cummings, Stimulated emission of radiation in a single mode, Phys. Rev. 140, A1051 (1965)

work page 1965
[6]

Brune, F

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Ha- gley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum Rabi os- cillation: a direct test of ﬁeld quantization in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1800 (1996) . 5

work page 1996
[7]

Greiner, O

M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Collapse and revival of the matter wave ﬁeld of a Bose-Einstein conden - sate, Nature 419, 51 (2002)

work page 2002
[8]

E. P. Wigner, Group theory and its application to the quan- tum mechanics of atomic spectra (Academic Press (New York), 1959)

work page 1959
[9]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK), 2000)

work page 2000
[10]

de Paz, A

A. de Paz, A. Sharma, A. Chotia, E. Maréchal, J. H. Huckans, P. Pedri, L. Santos, O. Gorceix, L. Vernac, and B. Laburthe- Tolra, Nonequilibrium quantum magnetism in a dipolar latti ce gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185305 (2013)

work page 2013
[11]

Geier, N

S. Geier, N. Thaicharoen, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, A. Salzinger , A. Tebben, D. Grimshandl, G. Zürn, and M. Weidemüller, Flo- quet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin system, Science 374, 1149 (2021)

work page 2021
[12]

Scholl, H

P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, G. Bornet, F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, S. Geier, A. Tebben, A. Salzinger, G. Zürn, T. Lahaye, M. Wei- demüller, and A. Browaeys, Microwave engineering of pro- grammable XXZ Hamiltonians in arrays of Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 020303 (2022)

work page 2022
[13]

Christakis, J

L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Probing site- resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecul es, Nature 614, 64 (2023)

work page 2023
[14]

Miller, A

C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, J. Lin, H. Hirzler, H. Gao, H. Zhou, M. D. Lukin, and J. Ye, Two-axis twisting using ﬂoquet-engineered XXZ spin models with polar molecules, Nature 633, 332 (2024)

work page 2024
[15]

T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cortiñas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dotsenko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux, T. Jolicoeur, and M. Brune, To- wards quantum simulation with circular Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011032 (2018)

work page 2018
[16]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbi - trary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016)

work page 2016
[17]

Sayrin, Non-destructive optical read-out and lo- cal manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms (2025), APS Global Physics Summit (Anaheim, CA), https://summit.aps.org/events/MAR-G14/5

C. Sayrin, Non-destructive optical read-out and lo- cal manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms (2025), APS Global Physics Summit (Anaheim, CA), https://summit.aps.org/events/MAR-G14/5

work page 2025
[18]

G. D. Mahan, Many-particle physics , 3rd ed. (Kluwer, New York, 2000)

work page 2000
[19]

Samajdar, W

R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a Kagome lattice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015785118 (2021)

work page 2021
[20]

D. J. Papoular, See supplemental material at [url will be inserted by publisher] for further theoretical details and computat ional methods. (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume II (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1962)

A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume II (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1962)

work page 1962
[22]

W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups , Proc. R. Soc. (London) A 294, 343 (1966)

work page 1966
[23]

D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974)

work page 1974
[24]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, non- relativistic theory , 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (UK), 1977)

work page 1977
[25]

C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell, The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972)

work page 1972
[26]

Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume I (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1961)

A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume I (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1961)

work page 1961
[27]

J. H. Eberly, N. B. Narozhny, and J. J. Sanchez-Mondragon, Pe- riodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323 (1980)

work page 1980
[28]

W. Li, C. Ates, and I. Lesanovsky, Nonadiabatic motional eﬀects and dissipative blockade for Rydberg atoms excited from optical lattices or microtraps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213005 (2013) . Measuring the dynamics of an XXZ quantum simulator and controlling collapse through symmetries SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL D. J. Papoular ∗ Laboratoire de Physique Théorique...

work page 2013
[29]

Hence, it is non–degenerate. In the speciﬁc Heisenberg case /u1D43D/u1D467= /u1D43D, the ground–state wavefunction /uni007C.varΨ H GS⟩ belongs to 4 the block labeled( /u1D4341/u1D454, /u1D446 = 0, /u1D440 = 0) which, according to Ta- ble S4, has dimension 14. For /u1D43D/u1D467≠ /u1D43D, the ground–state wave- function /uni007C.varΨ GS⟩ no longer has a we...

work page
[30]

2a of the main text

Results for /u1D43D/u1D467∕/u1D43D= −3 and /u1D6FC= 6 First, we focus on the speciﬁc values /u1D43D/u1D467∕/u1D43D= −3 and /u1D6FC= 6, as in Fig. 2a of the main text. Expressing the restriction /uni0303.s1/u1D43BXXZ of /u1D43BXXZ in the basis /u1D520(5) , we ﬁnd the exact result: /uni0303.s1/u1D43BXXZ /u1D43D = /parenleft.s3 −173351219∕4000752 22359∕5488 ...

work page
[31]

2 /parenright.s3

1 −27 . 2 /parenright.s3 . (S16) The probabilities /u1D45D(5) outer ( /u1D461) and /u1D45D(5) inner( /u1D461) obtained from the ini- tial state /uni007C.var/u1D709(5) ⟩∕‖/u1D709(5) ‖ = ( /uni007C.var/u1D452(5) outer ⟩+/uni007C.var/u1D452(5) inner⟩)∕ √ 2 undergo sinu- soidal oscillations at the same frequency, set by the diﬀere nce Δ /u1D438XXZ of the two ...

work page
[32]

General analytical description of the ( /u1D4342/u1D454, /u1D440 = 5) block We now turn to the general case, where /u1D43D/u1D467∕/u1D43Dand /u1D6FCmay take arbitrary values. Eq. ( S16) generalizes to: /uni0303.s1/u1D43BXXZ /u1D43D = /parenleft.s4 ℎ (0) 11 ℎ (0) 12 ℎ (0) 21 ℎ (0) 22 /parenright.s4 + /u1D43D/u1D467 /u1D43D /parenleft.s4 ℎ (1) 11 0 0 ℎ (1) ...

work page 1990

[1] [1]

(2) /u1D440 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 /u1D451 (± /u1D440 ) 1 12 66 220 495 792 924 /u1D6FF0[/u1D712 ( /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 90 /u1D6FF0[/u1D709(± /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 48 TABLE I

To summarize: /u1D43AH = /u1D437 spatial 6ℎ × /u1D43Espin ℎ and /u1D43AXXZ = /u1D437 spatial 6ℎ × /u1D437 spin ∞ ℎ . (2) /u1D440 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 /u1D451 (± /u1D440 ) 1 12 66 220 495 792 924 /u1D6FF0[/u1D712 ( /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 90 /u1D6FF0[/u1D709(± /u1D440 ) ] 1 2 9 24 50 76 48 TABLE I. Dimensions of the subspaces  ( /u1D440 ) ,  0[/u1D712 ( /u1D...

work page

[2] [2]

Subsequently, two conﬁgurations dominate: /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 0 ⟩ and its spin–ﬂipped conﬁguration /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 923⟩

05ℎ∕/u1D43D. Subsequently, two conﬁgurations dominate: /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 0 ⟩ and its spin–ﬂipped conﬁguration /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 923⟩. Their probabili- ties evolve aperiodically, reaching values ≲ 0. 15. All other /u1D45D(0) /u1D453 ( /u1D461) ≤ 0. 035. The dominance of /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 0 ⟩ and /uni007C.var/u1D450(0) 923⟩ is itself a signat...

work page

[3] [3]

Tinkham, Group theory and quantum mechanics (McGraw- Hill (New York), 1964)

M. Tinkham, Group theory and quantum mechanics (McGraw- Hill (New York), 1964)

work page 1964

[4] [4]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics(Saunders (New York), 1976)

work page 1976

[5] [5]

F. W. Cummings, Stimulated emission of radiation in a single mode, Phys. Rev. 140, A1051 (1965)

work page 1965

[6] [6]

Brune, F

M. Brune, F. Schmidt-Kaler, A. Maali, J. Dreyer, E. Ha- gley, J. M. Raimond, and S. Haroche, Quantum Rabi os- cillation: a direct test of ﬁeld quantization in a cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1800 (1996) . 5

work page 1996

[7] [7]

Greiner, O

M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch, Collapse and revival of the matter wave ﬁeld of a Bose-Einstein conden - sate, Nature 419, 51 (2002)

work page 2002

[8] [8]

E. P. Wigner, Group theory and its application to the quan- tum mechanics of atomic spectra (Academic Press (New York), 1959)

work page 1959

[9] [9]

M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK), 2000)

work page 2000

[10] [10]

de Paz, A

A. de Paz, A. Sharma, A. Chotia, E. Maréchal, J. H. Huckans, P. Pedri, L. Santos, O. Gorceix, L. Vernac, and B. Laburthe- Tolra, Nonequilibrium quantum magnetism in a dipolar latti ce gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 185305 (2013)

work page 2013

[11] [11]

Geier, N

S. Geier, N. Thaicharoen, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, A. Salzinger , A. Tebben, D. Grimshandl, G. Zürn, and M. Weidemüller, Flo- quet Hamiltonian engineering of an isolated many-body spin system, Science 374, 1149 (2021)

work page 2021

[12] [12]

Scholl, H

P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, G. Bornet, F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, S. Geier, A. Tebben, A. Salzinger, G. Zürn, T. Lahaye, M. Wei- demüller, and A. Browaeys, Microwave engineering of pro- grammable XXZ Hamiltonians in arrays of Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum 3, 020303 (2022)

work page 2022

[13] [13]

Christakis, J

L. Christakis, J. S. Rosenberg, R. Raj, S. Chi, A. Morn- ingstar, D. A. Huse, Z. Z. Yan, and W. S. Bakr, Probing site- resolved correlations in a spin system of ultracold molecul es, Nature 614, 64 (2023)

work page 2023

[14] [14]

Miller, A

C. Miller, A. N. Carroll, J. Lin, H. Hirzler, H. Gao, H. Zhou, M. D. Lukin, and J. Ye, Two-axis twisting using ﬂoquet-engineered XXZ spin models with polar molecules, Nature 633, 332 (2024)

work page 2024

[15] [15]

T. L. Nguyen, J. M. Raimond, C. Sayrin, R. Cortiñas, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, F. Assemat, I. Dotsenko, S. Gleyzes, S. Haroche, G. Roux, T. Jolicoeur, and M. Brune, To- wards quantum simulation with circular Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011032 (2018)

work page 2018

[16] [16]

Barredo, S

D. Barredo, S. de Léséleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbi - trary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science 354, 1021 (2016)

work page 2016

[17] [17]

Sayrin, Non-destructive optical read-out and lo- cal manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms (2025), APS Global Physics Summit (Anaheim, CA), https://summit.aps.org/events/MAR-G14/5

C. Sayrin, Non-destructive optical read-out and lo- cal manipulation of circular Rydberg atoms (2025), APS Global Physics Summit (Anaheim, CA), https://summit.aps.org/events/MAR-G14/5

work page 2025

[18] [18]

G. D. Mahan, Many-particle physics , 3rd ed. (Kluwer, New York, 2000)

work page 2000

[19] [19]

Samajdar, W

R. Samajdar, W. W. Ho, H. Pichler, M. D. Lukin, and S. Sachdev, Quantum phases of Rydberg atoms on a Kagome lattice, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2015785118 (2021)

work page 2021

[20] [20]

D. J. Papoular, See supplemental material at [url will be inserted by publisher] for further theoretical details and computat ional methods. (2025)

work page 2025

[21] [21]

Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume II (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1962)

A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume II (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1962)

work page 1962

[22] [22]

W. F. Brinkman and R. J. Elliott, Theory of spin-space groups , Proc. R. Soc. (London) A 294, 343 (1966)

work page 1966

[23] [23]

D. B. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica 76, 538 (1974)

work page 1974

[24] [24]

L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Quantum Mechanics, non- relativistic theory , 3rd ed. (Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford (UK), 1977)

work page 1977

[25] [25]

C. J. Bradley and A. P. Cracknell, The Mathematical Theory of Symmetry in Solids (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1972)

work page 1972

[26] [26]

Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume I (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1961)

A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, volume I (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1961)

work page 1961

[27] [27]

J. H. Eberly, N. B. Narozhny, and J. J. Sanchez-Mondragon, Pe- riodic spontaneous collapse and revival in a simple quantum model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323 (1980)

work page 1980

[28] [28]

W. Li, C. Ates, and I. Lesanovsky, Nonadiabatic motional eﬀects and dissipative blockade for Rydberg atoms excited from optical lattices or microtraps, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 213005 (2013) . Measuring the dynamics of an XXZ quantum simulator and controlling collapse through symmetries SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL D. J. Papoular ∗ Laboratoire de Physique Théorique...

work page 2013

[29] [29]

Hence, it is non–degenerate. In the speciﬁc Heisenberg case /u1D43D/u1D467= /u1D43D, the ground–state wavefunction /uni007C.varΨ H GS⟩ belongs to 4 the block labeled( /u1D4341/u1D454, /u1D446 = 0, /u1D440 = 0) which, according to Ta- ble S4, has dimension 14. For /u1D43D/u1D467≠ /u1D43D, the ground–state wave- function /uni007C.varΨ GS⟩ no longer has a we...

work page

[30] [30]

2a of the main text

Results for /u1D43D/u1D467∕/u1D43D= −3 and /u1D6FC= 6 First, we focus on the speciﬁc values /u1D43D/u1D467∕/u1D43D= −3 and /u1D6FC= 6, as in Fig. 2a of the main text. Expressing the restriction /uni0303.s1/u1D43BXXZ of /u1D43BXXZ in the basis /u1D520(5) , we ﬁnd the exact result: /uni0303.s1/u1D43BXXZ /u1D43D = /parenleft.s3 −173351219∕4000752 22359∕5488 ...

work page

[31] [31]

2 /parenright.s3

1 −27 . 2 /parenright.s3 . (S16) The probabilities /u1D45D(5) outer ( /u1D461) and /u1D45D(5) inner( /u1D461) obtained from the ini- tial state /uni007C.var/u1D709(5) ⟩∕‖/u1D709(5) ‖ = ( /uni007C.var/u1D452(5) outer ⟩+/uni007C.var/u1D452(5) inner⟩)∕ √ 2 undergo sinu- soidal oscillations at the same frequency, set by the diﬀere nce Δ /u1D438XXZ of the two ...

work page

[32] [32]

General analytical description of the ( /u1D4342/u1D454, /u1D440 = 5) block We now turn to the general case, where /u1D43D/u1D467∕/u1D43Dand /u1D6FCmay take arbitrary values. Eq. ( S16) generalizes to: /uni0303.s1/u1D43BXXZ /u1D43D = /parenleft.s4 ℎ (0) 11 ℎ (0) 12 ℎ (0) 21 ℎ (0) 22 /parenright.s4 + /u1D43D/u1D467 /u1D43D /parenleft.s4 ℎ (1) 11 0 0 ℎ (1) ...

work page 1990