Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 47 references

A Novel Multimodal Framework for Early Detection of Alzheimers Disease Using Deep Learning

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A claimed multimodal AD detection framework is missing from its own manuscript

desk verdict The manuscript body is an unrelated speech separation paper, so the Alzheimer's framework and its claims exist only in the abstract—nothing to review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03046 v1 pith:XZ5F44JE submitted 2025-08-05 cs.LG

Tatwadarshi P Nagarhalli , Sanket Patil , Vishal Pande , Uday Aswalekar , Prafulla Patil This is my paper
classification cs.LG
keywords Alzheimer'sdiseasemultimodalframeworkearlydetectiondeeplearningMRIcognitiveassessmentbiomarkersweightedaveraging
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The submitted paper claims to propose a multimodal deep learning framework for early detection of Alzheimer's disease, combining MRI images, cognitive assessments, and biomarkers via CNNs and LSTMs, with weighted averaging to fuse the modalities even when some data are missing. The abstract asserts that this approach improves diagnostic accuracy and enables detection before clinical symptoms appear. However, the full text of the manuscript is an unrelated paper on tiny real-time neural speech separation for hearable devices. It contains no description, dataset, experiments, or results for the Alzheimer's framework. The central claim therefore has no supporting evidence within the submitted document.

What carries the argument

The claimed machinery is a triple-modality pipeline: a CNN analyzing MRI images, an LSTM processing cognitive assessment and biomarker sequences, and a weighted averaging mechanism that aggregates the modality outputs into a final decision, designed to tolerate incomplete data. The full text contains a different mechanism: a real-time speech separation network operating in the time-frequency domain, with alternating fully connected layers on channel and frequency dimensions and a conv-batched LSTM for temporal processing. None of the Alzheimer's machinery appears in the manuscript.

What would settle it

Open the manuscript and search for 'Alzheimer's', 'MRI', 'cognitive', 'biomarker', or 'weighted averaging'; none appear because the full text is about speech separation. That absence, verifiable by any reader, settles that the submitted paper does not contain the claimed framework.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated only in the abstract, is that integrating MRI, cognitive, and biomarker data with a CNN-LSTM architecture and weighted-average fusion yields earlier and more reliable Alzheimer's detection than single-modality methods, and remains accurate with incomplete data. The manuscript body, however, is a speech separation paper: it presents a time-frequency network with fully connected layers alternating along channel and frequency dimensions, plus a convolutional batched LSTM, and evaluates it on blind speech separation and target speech extraction. There is no mention of Alzheimer's disease, MRI, cognitive tests, biomarkers, or the proposed fusion methodology anywhere in the full text. Thus, the claimed discovery is not established by any content in the paper.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the abstract accurately describes a real framework supported by the manuscript; in fact, the manuscript's full text is an unrelated speech separation paper, so the central claim is unverifiable from the submitted document.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the framework worked as claimed, early screening could combine routine MRI scans, cognitive tests, and blood biomarkers to flag Alzheimer's risk years before symptoms, enabling earlier intervention trials.
  • Weighted averaging of heterogeneous modalities would need to preserve diagnostic accuracy when a patient lacks one modality, such as when an MRI is unavailable.
  • The approach would imply that cognitive and biomarker signals carry predictive information about Alzheimer's that is complementary to structural brain imaging.
  • If validated, the system could shift diagnostic practice from symptom-based referral toward proactive multimodal screening in primary care.
  • The claimed robustness to incomplete data would make the framework practical for real-world clinical datasets, which frequently have missing entries.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mismatch between the abstract and the full text strongly suggests an upload or submission error; the Alzheimer's paper may exist elsewhere with the actual implementation and evaluation.
  • A reader evaluating the true potential of the idea should demand a comparison of weighted-average fusion against alternatives such as concatenation or gating on a cohort with complete and artificially missing modalities.
  • If the intended framework is real, its most falsifiable prediction is that predictive accuracy degrades gracefully with missing modalities; this can be tested through ablation studies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to present "A Novel Multimodal Framework for Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease Using Deep Learning," integrating MRI imaging, cognitive assessments, and biomarkers via CNN and LSTM networks, with weighted averaging to improve diagnostic accuracy and enable early detection. The full text, however, is a different paper: "TF-MLPNet: Tiny Real-Time Neural Speech Separation" by Itani, Chen, and Gollakota, concerning on-device speech separation on hearables. None of the AD-related methods, data, experiments, or results described in the abstract appear anywhere in the body.

Significance. If a validated multimodal CNN/LSTM AD-detection framework with robust incomplete-data handling were presented, it would be of considerable clinical and machine-learning interest, particularly for early intervention. However, the submitted manuscript contains no such framework, no dataset, no experimental evaluation, and no results. There are no reproducible artifacts or machine-checked derivations to evaluate. Consequently, the significance of the actual submission is that of an unrelated speech-separation paper, which does not support the abstract's claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. full text] The central claim of the paper—that the proposed multimodal framework improves early AD detection using CNN on MRI and LSTM on cognitive/biomarker data with weighted averaging—has no supporting content in the manuscript body. The full text is the speech-separation paper "TF-MLPNet: Tiny Real-Time Neural Speech Separation" by Itani, Chen, and Gollakota, with its own title, abstract, sections, experiments, and references. No section or equation describes the AD framework, its input modalities, preprocessing, fusion method, or evaluation. This is an internal inconsistency that makes the scientific claim unverifiable.
  2. [Full text (all sections)] Because the body contains no AD-specific content, the load-bearing assumptions of the abstract—that a multimodal dataset with aligned MRI, cognitive, and biomarker samples was used, and that weighted averaging preserves diagnostic accuracy under missing modalities—are entirely unsupported. There is no dataset description, no training procedure, no metric definitions, and no results table for AD. The evaluation in Section 5 concerns speech separation quality and runtime on the GAP9 processor, which is irrelevant to the stated AD contribution. This is not a local gap that can be fixed by adding a paragraph; the manuscript would need to be replaced with an actual AD study.
  3. [Title and arXiv metadata] The manuscript's self-identified arXiv header reads "arXiv:2508.03047v1 [cs.SD]", matching the TF-MLPNet speech-separation paper, not the claimed AD paper with ID 2508.03046. This confirms that the submitted text is not merely an early draft but the wrong document. The authors must either withdraw and resubmit the correct manuscript or clearly present the speech-separation work as the submission; the current combination of abstract and body is not a coherent paper.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 1] Figure 1 depicts the TF-MLPNet architecture and is not described in relation to any AD modality; the caption should be updated or the figure removed in any resubmission.
  2. [Section 6 (References)] The reference list contains only speech and audio processing references; no AD, neuroimaging, or clinical biomarker literature is cited, so the manuscript cannot locate its claimed contribution in prior work.
  3. [Abstract and title] The abstract has typos (e.g., "Alzheimers Disease" lacks an apostrophe) and uses undefined terms such as "advanced techniques like weighted averaging"; these would need attention if a correct manuscript is resubmitted.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain exists to analyze: the submitted body is an unrelated speech-separation paper, so the AD framework's claims are unsupported by absence, not by circular reasoning.

full rationale

The manuscript under review pairs an abstract describing a multimodal AD-detection framework (CNN for MRI, LSTM for cognitive and biomarker data, weighted averaging, incomplete-data robustness) with a full text that is entirely a different paper, 'TF-MLPNet: Tiny Real-Time Neural Speech Separation' (Itani, Chen, and Gollakota), bearing the header 'arXiv:2508.03047v1 [cs.SD]'. There is therefore no derivation, no fitted parameter, no dataset, and no evaluation of the AD system anywhere in the text; the AD claims are not derived from the inputs at all. Circularity requires a claimed derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction or via load-bearing self-citation. Here no such chain exists: nothing in the speech-separation body defines MRI, cognitive assessments, biomarkers, or weighted averaging in terms of the AD accuracy claim. The failure is one of content mismatch and unsupported assertion, which falls under soundness and completeness rather than circularity. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0, and no circular steps are reported.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard components (CNN, LSTM, weighted averaging) plus two strong unverified premises: the clinical lead-time of biomarkers and the actual existence of the described framework and evaluation. The full text supplies none of the framework's details.

free parameters (2)
  • Fusion weights in weighted averaging
    The abstract says results are aggregated by weighted averaging, but the weights are unspecified. If they are learned from or tuned on the data, they are free parameters on which the central accuracy claim depends.
  • CNN and LSTM architecture hyperparameters
    No architecture details, layer counts, or training configuration are given for either network in the abstract; any choices made at implementation time would be free parameters affecting the claimed accuracy.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Biomarker and cognitive data can reveal Alzheimer's years before clinical symptoms appear
    The abstract asserts this to justify including those modalities ('these can detect Alzheimer's long before the onset of clinical symptoms'), but provides no citation or evidence.
  • ad hoc to paper The multimodal framework and its experimental evaluation exist and behave as the abstract describes
    The full text contains no CNN/LSTM/weighted-averaging AD framework, no dataset, and no results; it is an unrelated speech separation paper, so the entire claim depends on content that is not in the manuscript.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Novel Multimodal Framework for Early Detection of Alzheimers Disease Using Deep Learning." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XZ5F44JE

@misc{pith2026250803046,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Novel Multimodal Framework for Early Detection of Alzheimers Disease Using Deep Learning},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XZ5F44JE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03046}
}
read the original abstract

Alzheimers Disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that poses significant challenges in its early diagnosis, often leading to delayed treatment and poorer outcomes for patients. Traditional diagnostic methods, typically reliant on single data modalities, fall short of capturing the multifaceted nature of the disease. In this paper, we propose a novel multimodal framework for the early detection of AD that integrates data from three primary sources: MRI imaging, cognitive assessments, and biomarkers. This framework employs Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for analyzing MRI images and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for processing cognitive and biomarker data. The system enhances diagnostic accuracy and reliability by aggregating results from these distinct modalities using advanced techniques like weighted averaging, even in incomplete data. The multimodal approach not only improves the robustness of the detection process but also enables the identification of AD at its earliest stages, offering a significant advantage over conventional methods. The integration of biomarkers and cognitive tests is particularly crucial, as these can detect Alzheimer's long before the onset of clinical symptoms, thereby facilitating earlier intervention and potentially altering the course of the disease. This research demonstrates that the proposed framework has the potential to revolutionize the early detection of AD, paving the way for more timely and effective treatments

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    First, deep learning has become central to speech sep- aration algorithms [1, 2, 3, 4], which typically require large, energy intensive resources like GPUs

    Introduction Over the past decade, two key technological trends have emerged. First, deep learning has become central to speech sep- aration algorithms [1, 2, 3, 4], which typically require large, energy intensive resources like GPUs. Second, there is in- creasing interest in incorporating speech separation into hear- ables, such as hearing aids, headphon...

    work page

  2. [2]

    The researchers are partly supported by the Moore Inventor Fellow award #10617, Thomas J

    Related work Blind speech separation and target speaker extraction.Prior neural architectures [19, 2, 20, 21] use components like convo- lutional [19], LSTM [4], transformer [3], and state-space [22] arXiv:2508.03047v1 [cs.SD] 5 Aug 2025 Acknowledgments. The researchers are partly supported by the Moore Inventor Fellow award #10617, Thomas J. Cable Endowe...

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Neural target speech extraction: An overview,

    K. Zmolikova, M. Delcroix, T. Ochiai, K. Kinoshita, J. ˇCernock´y, and D. Yu, “Neural target speech extraction: An overview,”IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Tf-gridnet: Making time-frequency domain models great again for monaural speaker separation,

    Z.-Q. Wang, S. Cornell, S. Choi, Y . Lee, B.-Y . Kim, and S. Watan- abe, “Tf-gridnet: Making time-frequency domain models great again for monaural speaker separation,” in ICASSP, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Attention is all you need in speech separation,

    C. Subakan, M. Ravanelli, S. Cornell, M. Bronzi, and J. Zhong, “Attention is all you need in speech separation,” inICASSP, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Dual-path RNN: efficient long sequence modeling for time-domain single-channel speech separation,

    Y . Luo, Z. Chen, and T. Yoshioka, “Dual-path RNN: efficient long sequence modeling for time-domain single-channel speech separation,” in ICASSP. IEEE, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Se- mantic hearing: Programming acoustic scenes with binaural hear- ables,

    B. Veluri, M. Itani, J. Chan, T. Yoshioka, and S. Gollakota, “Se- mantic hearing: Programming acoustic scenes with binaural hear- ables,” in ACM UIST, 2023

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Look once to hear: Target speech hearing with noisy examples,

    B. Veluri, M. Itani, T. Chen, T. Yoshioka, and S. Gollakota, “Look once to hear: Target speech hearing with noisy examples,” inACM CHI, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Multi-channel target speaker extraction with refine- ment: The wavlab submission to the second clarity enhancement challenge,

    S. Cornell, Z.-Q. Wang, Y . Masuyama, S. Watanabe, M. Pariente, and N. Ono, “Multi-channel target speaker extraction with refine- ment: The wavlab submission to the second clarity enhancement challenge,” in arXiv, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Hearable devices with sound bubbles,

    T. Chen, M. Itani, S. Eskimez, T. Yoshioka, and S. Gollakota, “Hearable devices with sound bubbles,”Nature Electronics, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    NDP120 – Syntiant,

    “NDP120 – Syntiant,” https://www.syntiant.com/ ndp120

  4. [12]

    GAP9 processor — GreenWaves Technologies,

    “GAP9 processor — GreenWaves Technologies,” https:// greenwaves-technologies.com/gap9_processor/

  5. [13]

    Fspen: an ultra-lightweight network for real time speech enah- ncment,

    L. Yang, W. Liu, R. Meng, G. Lee, S. Baek, and H.-G. Moon, “Fspen: an ultra-lightweight network for real time speech enah- ncment,” in ICASSP, 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    An investigation of incorporating mamba for speech enhancement,

    R. Chao, W.-H. Cheng, M. La Quatra, S. M. Siniscalchi, C.-H. H. Yang, S.-W. Fu, and Y . Tsao, “An investigation of incorporating mamba for speech enhancement,” arXiv, 2024

    2024

  7. [15]

    Mp-senet: A speech enhance- ment model with parallel denoising of magnitude and phase spec- tra,

    Y .-X. Lu, Y . Ai, and Z.-H. Ling, “Mp-senet: A speech enhance- ment model with parallel denoising of magnitude and phase spec- tra,” arXiv, 2023

    2023

  8. [16]

    Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vi- sion,

    I. Tolstikhin, N. Houlsby, A. Kolesnikov, L. Beyer, X. Zhai, T. Un- terthiner, J. Yung, A. Steiner, D. Keysers, J. Uszkoreit, M. Lucic, and A. Dosovitskiy, “Mlp-mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vi- sion,” in Neurips, 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Hyper- conformer: Multi-head hypermixer for efficient speech recogni- tion,

    F. Mai, J. Zuluaga-Gomez, T. Parcollet, and P. Motlicek, “Hyper- conformer: Multi-head hypermixer for efficient speech recogni- tion,” in Interspeech, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Sum- marymixing: A linear-complexity alternative to self-attention for speech recognition and understanding,

    T. Parcollet, R. van Dalen, S. Zhang, and S. Bhattacharya, “Sum- marymixing: A linear-complexity alternative to self-attention for speech recognition and understanding,” in Interspeech, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Personalized speech enhancement: new models and comprehensive evaluation,

    S. E. Eskimez, T. Yoshioka, H. Wang, X. Wang, Z. Chen, and X. Huang, “Personalized speech enhancement: new models and comprehensive evaluation,” in IEEE ICASSP, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Ac- celerating rnn-based speech enhancement on a multi-core mcu with mixed fp16-int8 post-training quantization,

    M. Rusci, M. Fariselli, M. Croome, F. Paci, and E. Flamand, “Ac- celerating rnn-based speech enhancement on a multi-core mcu with mixed fp16-int8 post-training quantization,” in arXiv, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Conv-tasnet: Surpassing ideal time–frequency magnitude masking for speech separation,

    Y . Luo and N. Mesgarani, “Conv-tasnet: Surpassing ideal time–frequency magnitude masking for speech separation,” IEEE/ACM Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc., 2019

    2019

  14. [22]

    Mossformer: Pushing the performance limit of monaural speech separation using gated single-head trans- former with convolution-augmented joint self-attentions,

    S. Zhao and B. Ma, “Mossformer: Pushing the performance limit of monaural speech separation using gated single-head trans- former with convolution-augmented joint self-attentions,” in ICASSP, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Separate and recon- struct: Asymmetric encoder-decoder for speech separation,

    U.-H. Shin, S. Lee, T. Kim, and H.-M. Park, “Separate and recon- struct: Asymmetric encoder-decoder for speech separation,” in arXiv, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Spmamba: State-space model is all you need in speech separation,

    K. Li and G. Chen, “Spmamba: State-space model is all you need in speech separation,” in arXiv, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Stft- domain neural speech enhancement with very low algorithmic la- tency,

    Z.-Q. Wang, G. Wichern, S. Watanabe, and J. Le Roux, “Stft- domain neural speech enhancement with very low algorithmic la- tency,” Trans. on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    A perceptually-motivated approach for low- complexity, real-time enhancement of fullband speech,

    J.-M. Valin, U. Isik, N. Phansalkar, R. Giri, K. Helwani, and A. Krishnaswamy, “A perceptually-motivated approach for low- complexity, real-time enhancement of fullband speech,” in arXiv, 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Speakerbeam-ss: Real-time target speaker extraction with lightweight conv-tasnet and state space modeling,

    H. Sato, T. Moriya, M. Mimura, S. Horiguchi, T. Ochiai, T. Ashihara, A. Ando, K. Shinayama, and M. Delcroix, “Speakerbeam-ss: Real-time target speaker extraction with lightweight conv-tasnet and state space modeling,” 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Deepfilternet2: Towards real-time speech enhancement on em- bedded devices for full-band audio,

    H. Schr ¨oter, A. N. Escalante-B., T. Rosenkranz, and A. Maier, “Deepfilternet2: Towards real-time speech enhancement on em- bedded devices for full-band audio,” in arXiv, 2022

    2022

  21. [29]

    Real-time target sound extraction,

    B. Veluri, J. Chan, M. Itani, T. Chen, T. Yoshioka, and S. Gol- lakota, “Real-time target sound extraction,” in ICASSP, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    The 2nd clar- ity enhancement challenge for hearing aid speech intelligibility enhancement: Overview and outcomes,

    M. A. Akeroyd, W. Bailey, J. Barker, T. J. Cox, J. F. Culling, S. Graetzer, G. Naylor, Z. Podwi ´nska, and Z. Tu, “The 2nd clar- ity enhancement challenge for hearing aid speech intelligibility enhancement: Overview and outcomes,” in ICASSP, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    Hello edge: Keyword spotting on microcontrollers,

    Y . Zhang, N. Suda, L. Lai, and V . Chandra, “Hello edge: Keyword spotting on microcontrollers,” in arXiv, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    Tinysv: Speaker verification in tinyml with on-device learning,

    M. Pavan, G. Mombelli, F. Sinacori, and M. Roveri, “Tinysv: Speaker verification in tinyml with on-device learning,” in Pro- ceedings of the 4th International Conference on AI-ML Systems , New York, NY , USA, 2025, Association for Computing Machin- ery

    2025

  25. [33]

    “it os okay to be uncommon

    Y . Wu, X. Quan, M. R. Izadi, and C.-C. J. Huang, ““it os okay to be uncommon”: Quantizing sound event detection networks on hardware accelerators with uncommon sub-byte support,” in ICASSP, 2024, pp. 281–285

    2024

  26. [34]

    Tinylstms: Efficient neural speech enhancement for hearing aids,

    I. Fedorov, M. Stamenovic, C. Jensen, L.-C. Yang, A. Mandell, Y . Gan, M. Mattina, and P. N. Whatmough, “Tinylstms: Efficient neural speech enhancement for hearing aids,” Interspeech, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Towards fully quantized neural networks for speech enhancement,

    E. Cohen, H. V . Habi, and A. Netzer, “Towards fully quantized neural networks for speech enhancement,” in Interspeech, 2023, pp. 181–185

    2023

  28. [36]

    Real- time denoising and dereverberation wtih tiny recurrent u-net,

    H.-S. Choi, S. Park, J. H. Lee, H. Heo, D. Jeon, and K. Lee, “Real- time denoising and dereverberation wtih tiny recurrent u-net,” in ICASSP, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    Low bit rate binaural link for improved ultra low-latency low-complexity multichannel speech enhancement in hearing aids,

    N. L. Westhausen and B. T. Meyer, “Low bit rate binaural link for improved ultra low-latency low-complexity multichannel speech enhancement in hearing aids,” in WASPAA, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Two-step knowl- edge distillation for tiny speech enhancement,

    R. D. Nathoo, M. Kegler, and M. Stamenovic, “Two-step knowl- edge distillation for tiny speech enhancement,” in ICASSP, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Distilled binary neural network for monaural speech separation,

    X. Chen, G. Liu, J. Shi, J. Xu, and B. Xu, “Distilled binary neural network for monaural speech separation,” in IJCNN, 2018

    2018

  32. [40]

    Fully quantized neural networks for audio source separation,

    E. Cohen, H. V . Habi, R. Peretz, and A. Netzer, “Fully quantized neural networks for audio source separation,”IEEE Open Journal of Signal Processing, vol. 5, pp. 926–933, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    A survey of quantization methods for efficient neural network inference,

    A. Gholami, S. Kim, Z. Dong, Z. Yao, M. W. Mahoney, and K. Keutzer, “A survey of quantization methods for efficient neural network inference,” in Low-Power Computer Vision. 2022

    2022

  34. [42]

    Lib- rispeech: An asr corpus based on public domain audio books,

    V . Panayotov, G. Chen, D. Povey, and S. Khudanpur, “Lib- rispeech: An asr corpus based on public domain audio books,” in ICASSP, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    Cstr vctk corpus: English multi-speaker corpus for speech synthesis,

    C. Veaux, J. Yamagishi, and K. MacDonald, “Cstr vctk corpus: English multi-speaker corpus for speech synthesis,” University of Edinburgh. The Centre for Speech Technology Research, 2017

    2017

  36. [44]

    Speaker diarization with lstm,

    Q. Wang, C. Downey, L. Wan, P. A. Mansfield, and I. L. Moreno, “Speaker diarization with lstm,” in ICASSP. IEEE, 2018

    2018

  37. [45]

    Dnsmos p.835: A non- intrusive perceptual objective speech quality metric to evaluate noise suppressors,

    C. K. A. Reddy, V . Gopal, and R. Cutler, “Dnsmos p.835: A non- intrusive perceptual objective speech quality metric to evaluate noise suppressors,” in ICASSP, 2022, pp. 886–890

    2022

  38. [46]

    Wireless hearables with programmable speech ai accelerators,

    M. Itani, T. Chen, A. Raghavan, G. Kohlberg, and S. Gollakota, “Wireless hearables with programmable speech ai accelerators,” in ACM MOBICOM, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    Hybrid neural networks for on-device directional hearing,

    A. Wang, M. Kim, H. Zhang, and S. Gollakota, “Hybrid neural networks for on-device directional hearing,” AAAI, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.