Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 58 references

Nexus-INR: Diverse Knowledge-guided Arbitrary-Scale Multimodal Medical Image Super-Resolution

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Nexus-INR is an arbitrary-scale multimodal medical image super-resolution framework that, according to the paper, outperforms state-of-the-art methods on the BraTS2020 dataset for both reconstruction and downstream tumor segmentation.

desk verdict The submitted PDF is not the Nexus-INR paper—it is a different Mamba segmentation paper (SSFMamba) with different authors—so the artifact cannot be reviewed as submitted. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.03073 v1 pith:US2OJEIG submitted 2025-08-05 eess.IV cs.CV

Bo Zhang , JianFei Huo , Zheng Zhang , Wufan Wang , Hui Gao , Xiangyang Gong , Wendong Wang This is my paper
classification eess.IVcs.CV
keywords arbitrary-scalesuper-resolutionimplicitneuralrepresentationmultimodalmedicalimagingcross-modalknowledgedistillationbrainMRIBraTS2020tumorsegmentationclassification-guideddisentanglement
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Nexus-INR claims to solve arbitrary-scale super-resolution for multimodal medical images. The paper proposes a three-component framework on an implicit neural representation (INR) backbone: a dual-branch encoder that uses an auxiliary classification task to split features into shared anatomical structure and modality-specific detail, a cross-modal attention distillation module that transfers high-frequency information from a high-resolution reference modality to a low-resolution one, and an integrated segmentation module that injects anatomical semantics. The claimed payoff is that a single model can reconstruct a brain MRI at any requested scale while borrowing detail from companion modalities, and the same features improve downstream tumor segmentation. The paper reports that on the BraTS2020 dataset, Nexus-INR outperforms state-of-the-art methods on both super-resolution and segmentation metrics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the dual-branch encoder whose auxiliary classification task forces the latent space to separate shared anatomical structure from modality-specific features; on top of it, the knowledge distillation module uses cross-modal attention to copy high-frequency detail from the high-resolution reference modality into the low-resolution modality's reconstruction, stabilised by a self-supervised consistency loss. A third, integrated segmentation module embeds anatomical semantics so that reconstruction and downstream segmentation are optimised jointly. The INR backbone supplies arbitrary-scale coordinate querying, so the entire pipeline can upscale to any resolution in one pass.

What would settle it

Run Nexus-INR on BraTS2020 while withholding or randomly permuting the registration of the high-resolution reference modality. If super-resolution quality stays high, the cross-modal attention is not the source of the gain, contradicting the claimed mechanism. A second check: compare against a single-modality INR with identical capacity and same training budget; if the multimodal version does not beat it clearly, the claimed benefit of cross-modal distillation is not demonstrated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that arbitrary-scale multimodal super-resolution can be made substantially better by explicitly separating what is common across modalities from what is specific to each modality, and then using the common anatomy plus a sharp reference modality to guide reconstruction of a blurry one. Concretely, Nexus-INR couples an INR, which maps continuous coordinates to intensities and so naturally handles any upsampling factor, with three task-level modules: a classification-guided dual-branch encoder for the disentanglement, a cross-modal attention distillation with a self-supervised consistency loss for detail transfer, and a segmentation module that ties the representation to anatomical labels. The paper argues that this combination yields state-of-the-art reconstruction quality and better tumor segmentation on BraTS2020 than existing super-resolution methods.

Load-bearing premise

The premise that the auxiliary classification task actually separates each modality's features into shared anatomy and modality-specific detail, and that the cross-modal attention can then transfer useful high-frequency information from a high-resolution reference to a low-resolution modality, is what the reported gains stand on; if that separation is imperfect or the modalities are not well aligned, the distillation branch cannot improve reconstruction.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single trained Nexus-INR can upsample a low-resolution MRI to any requested scale without retraining for each factor, since the INR queries continuous coordinates.
  • When several aligned modalities are available, the sharpest one (e.g., T1ce or T2) can be used as a reference to improve restoration of the blurriest, so the method degrades gracefully as reference quality drops.
  • Because segmentation semantics are injected during training, the same network can produce a tumor segmentation map alongside the super-resolved image, shortening clinical pipelines that currently run SR and segmentation separately.
  • If the disentanglement is real, the shared-anatomy branch should transfer across modality pairs, making the method applicable when the high-resolution reference is a different MRI sequence than the one being restored.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The provided full text in this file is a different manuscript (a 3D segmentation framework called SSFMamba); the Nexus-INR experiments, ablations, and exact numbers are not present here, so the abstract's reported superiority could not be checked against details.
  • A natural untested extension is zero-shot reconstruction of an entirely missing modality: the shared-anatomy branch could generate structure while the modality-specific branch is synthesised from the reference, though the paper does not claim this.
  • The auxiliary classification task focuses the disentanglement on tumor-relevant classes; one could test whether the same framework helps super-resolution of healthy tissue or other organs, where the classification signal would need to be redefined.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submitted manuscript is titled 'Nexus-INR: Diverse Knowledge-guided Arbitrary-Scale Multimodal Medical Image Super-Resolution' and its abstract describes a three-component framework for arbitrary-scale super-resolution of multimodal brain MRI, combining a dual-branch encoder with an auxiliary classification task, a cross-modal attention distillation module with a self-supervised consistency loss, and an integrated segmentation module. The abstract claims state-of-the-art performance on the BraTS2020 dataset for both super-resolution and downstream segmentation. However, the full text of the submitted artifact is a different paper, 'SSFMamba: Learning Symmetry-driven Spatial-Frequency Modeling for Physically Consistent 3D Medical Image Segmentation' (arXiv:2508.03069v2), with a different title, author list, and no super-resolution content. The body of the submission contains no equations, architecture diagrams, loss definitions, or experimental results for Nexus-INR. The only Nexus-INR content is the abstract, so the central claims of the submission cannot be verified or evaluated from the provided artifact.

Significance. If Nexus-INR works as described, the proposed combination of classification-guided disentanglement, cross-modal knowledge distillation, and integrated segmentation for arbitrary-scale super-resolution would be a potentially valuable contribution to multimodal medical image analysis, addressing a real limitation of INR-based methods in handling multi-modal inputs with varying resolutions. However, the submitted manuscript provides no evidence toward this claim: the full text is an unrelated segmentation paper, and the Nexus-INR abstract alone cannot support any assessment of soundness, novelty, or experimental validity. The SSFMamba paper that constitutes the body is a separate work with its own experiments and contributions, but it is not the paper under review and does not address super-resolution. Consequently, the significance of the submitted manuscript as it stands is unassessable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (all sections, I–V)] The submitted full text is the SSFMamba paper (arXiv:2508.03069v2), not Nexus-INR. The title, author list, abstract, method, and experiments all describe a frequency-domain Mamba segmentation framework, with no mention of arbitrary-scale super-resolution, implicit neural representations, or the Nexus-INR components. The central claim that Nexus-INR outperforms state-of-the-art methods on BraTS2020 for super-resolution and downstream segmentation is therefore completely unsupported by the artifact as submitted.
  2. [Abstract, 'three key components'] The abstract describes three specific components: a dual-branch encoder with an auxiliary classification task for disentanglement, a knowledge distillation module using cross-modal attention with a self-supervised consistency loss, and an integrated segmentation module. None of these components appear anywhere in the full text. The SSFMamba body contains a dual-branch encoder, but it separates spatial and frequency features for segmentation and includes no classification task, no cross-modal attention, no consistency loss, and no super-resolution module. The claimed mechanism is therefore unverifiable from the submitted manuscript.
  3. [Experimental sections (Sections IV.A–IV.C)] The abstract says experiments on BraTS2020 demonstrate superiority in both super-resolution and downstream segmentation. The full text reports only Dice and HD95 segmentation results on BraTS2020, BraTS2023, and BTCV for SSFMamba, with no super-resolution metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM), no arbitrary-scale evaluation, and no comparison for the super-resolution task. The reported experiments are for a different method and task, so the empirical claims in the abstract are not backed by any table, figure, or statistical analysis in this submission.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Manuscript metadata] The arXiv identifier in the reader's materials is 2508.03073 (eess.IV) but the full text carries the arXiv identifier 2508.03069v2 and a different title. This appears to be a packaging error, but it means the submitted artifact is internally inconsistent between the abstract and the body.
  2. [Formatting of the supplied full text] The SSFMamba body contains corrupted mathematical expressions and garbled symbols in several equations and tables (e.g., the loss function in Section III.C and various numbers in Tables I–IV). Since this text is not the submitted paper, I do not assess it substantively, but the rendering issues would need to be fixed before any resubmission.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be established: the submitted full text is SSFMamba, a different paper, so Nexus-INR has no equations or derivations in the artifact to audit.

full rationale

The artifact contains the Nexus-INR abstract followed by a full text that is a different manuscript, SSFMamba (arXiv:2508.03069v2), about symmetry-driven spatial-frequency Mamba segmentation. The SSFMamba body provides no equations, loss definitions, architecture details, or experimental tables for Nexus-INR; its BraTS2020/BraTS2023/BTCV results are for the SSFMamba segmentation architecture, not for the arbitrary-scale multimodal super-resolution framework described in the abstract. Consequently, there is no Nexus-INR derivation chain present to walk, and none of the seven circularity patterns can be exhibited: no quantity is defined in terms of another, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no load-bearing self-citation is invoked, and no ansatz is smuggled in via citation. The abstract's claim that Nexus-INR outperforms state-of-the-art methods is therefore unverified by the reviewed artifact, but unverified is not the same as circular. Per the hard rule that circularity must be shown by quoting the paper's own equations or explicit reductions, I find no circular step and assign a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Review was restricted to the abstract because the supplied full text belongs to a different paper (SSFMamba, arXiv:2508.03069v2). No equations, hyperparameters, or architectural details of Nexus-INR were available to audit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nexus-INR: Diverse Knowledge-guided Arbitrary-Scale Multimodal Medical Image Super-Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/US2OJEIG

@misc{pith2026250803073,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nexus-INR: Diverse Knowledge-guided Arbitrary-Scale Multimodal Medical Image Super-Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/US2OJEIG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.03073}
}
read the original abstract

Arbitrary-resolution super-resolution (ARSR) provides crucial flexibility for medical image analysis by adapting to diverse spatial resolutions. However, traditional CNN-based methods are inherently ill-suited for ARSR, as they are typically designed for fixed upsampling factors. While INR-based methods overcome this limitation, they still struggle to effectively process and leverage multi-modal images with varying resolutions and details. In this paper, we propose Nexus-INR, a Diverse Knowledge-guided ARSR framework, which employs varied information and downstream tasks to achieve high-quality, adaptive-resolution medical image super-resolution. Specifically, Nexus-INR contains three key components. A dual-branch encoder with an auxiliary classification task to effectively disentangle shared anatomical structures and modality-specific features; a knowledge distillation module using cross-modal attention that guides low-resolution modality reconstruction with high-resolution reference, enhanced by self-supervised consistency loss; an integrated segmentation module that embeds anatomical semantics to improve both reconstruction quality and downstream segmentation performance. Experiments on the BraTS2020 dataset for both super-resolution and downstream segmentation demonstrate that Nexus-INR outperforms state-of-the-art methods across various metrics.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series,

    Y . LeCun, Y . Bengioet al., “Convolutional networks for images, speech, and time series,”The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks, vol. 3361, no. 10, p. 1995, 1995

    work page 1995

  2. [2]

    Attention is all you need,

    A. Vaswani, N. Shazeer, N. Parmar, J. Uszkoreit, L. Jones, A. N. Gomez, Ł. Kaiser, and I. Polosukhin, “Attention is all you need,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,

    A. Gu and T. Dao, “Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces,” inCOLM’24, 2024

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Physics of mri: a primer,

    D. B. Plewes and W. Kucharczyk, “Physics of mri: a primer,”Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1038–1054, 2012

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    Cddfuse: Correlation-driven dual-branch feature decomposition for multi-modality image fusion,

    Z. Zhao, H. Bai, J. Zhang, Y . Zhang, S. Xu, Z. Lin, R. Timofte, and L. Van Gool, “Cddfuse: Correlation-driven dual-branch feature decomposition for multi-modality image fusion,” inCVPR’23, 2023, pp. 5906–5916

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    Wave-mamba: Wavelet state space model for ultra-high-definition low-light image enhancement,

    W. Zou, H. Gao, W. Yang, and T. Liu, “Wave-mamba: Wavelet state space model for ultra-high-definition low-light image enhancement,” in ACM MM’24, 2024, pp. 1534–1543

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Freqmamba: Viewing mamba from a frequency perspective for image deraining,

    Z. Zou, H. Yu, J. Huang, and F. Zhao, “Freqmamba: Viewing mamba from a frequency perspective for image deraining,” inACM MM’24, 2024, pp. 1905–1914

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Em-net: Efficient channel and frequency learning with mamba for 3d medical image segmentation,

    A. Chang, J. Zeng, R. Huang, and D. Ni, “Em-net: Efficient channel and frequency learning with mamba for 3d medical image segmentation,” in MICCAI’23, 2024, pp. 266–275

    work page 2024

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Lc-fdnet: Learned lossless image compression with frequency decomposition network,

    H. Rhee, Y . I. Jang, S. Kim, and N. I. Cho, “Lc-fdnet: Learned lossless image compression with frequency decomposition network,” in CVPR’22, 2022, pp. 6033–6042

    2022

  2. [10]

    Space-frequency quantization for image compression with directionlets,

    V . Velisavljevic, B. Beferull-Lozano, and M. Vetterli, “Space-frequency quantization for image compression with directionlets,”IEEE Transac- tions on Image Processing, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 1761–1773, 2007

    2007

  3. [11]

    Learning in the frequency domain,

    K. Xu, M. Qin, F. Sun, Y . Wang, Y .-K. Chen, and F. Ren, “Learning in the frequency domain,” inCVPR’20, 2020, pp. 1740–1749

    2020

  4. [12]

    U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,

    O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox, “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” inMICCAI’15, 2015, pp. 234–241

    2015

  5. [13]

    Uxnet: Searching multi-level feature aggregation for 3d medical image segmentation,

    Y . Ji, R. Zhang, Z. Li, J. Ren, S. Zhang, and P. Luo, “Uxnet: Searching multi-level feature aggregation for 3d medical image segmentation,” in MICCAI’20, 2020, pp. 346–356

    2020

  6. [14]

    Mednext: transformer-driven scaling of convnets for medical image segmentation,

    S. Roy, G. Koehler, C. Ulrich, M. Baumgartner, J. Petersen, F. Isensee, P. F. Jaeger, and K. H. Maier-Hein, “Mednext: transformer-driven scaling of convnets for medical image segmentation,” inMICCAI’23, 2023, pp. 405–415

    2023

  7. [15]

    Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation,

    A. Hatamizadeh, Y . Tang, V . Nath, D. Yang, A. Myronenko, B. Land- man, H. R. Roth, and D. Xu, “Unetr: Transformers for 3d medical image segmentation,” inWACV’22, 2022, pp. 574–584

    2022

  8. [16]

    Transunet: Rethinking the u-net architecture design for medical image segmentation through the lens of transformers,

    J. Chen, J. Mei, X. Li, Y . Lu, Q. Yu, Q. Wei, X. Luo, Y . Xie, E. Adeli, Y . Wanget al., “Transunet: Rethinking the u-net architecture design for medical image segmentation through the lens of transformers,”Medical Image Analysis, vol. 97, p. 103280, 2024

    2024

  9. [17]

    Swinunetr-v2: Stronger swin transformers with stagewise convolutions for 3d medical image segmentation,

    Y . He, V . Nath, D. Yang, Y . Tang, A. Myronenko, and D. Xu, “Swinunetr-v2: Stronger swin transformers with stagewise convolutions for 3d medical image segmentation,” inMICCAI’23, 2023, pp. 416–426

    2023

  10. [18]

    Self-supervised pre-training of swin transformers for 3d medical image analysis,

    Y . Tang, D. Yang, W. Li, H. R. Roth, B. Landman, D. Xu, V . Nath, and A. Hatamizadeh, “Self-supervised pre-training of swin transformers for 3d medical image analysis,” inCVPR’22, 2022, pp. 20 730–20 740

    2022

  11. [19]

    Cats: Complementary cnn and transformer encoders for segmentation,

    H. Li, D. Hu, H. Liu, J. Wang, and I. Oguz, “Cats: Complementary cnn and transformer encoders for segmentation,” inISBI’22. IEEE, 2022, pp. 1–5

    2022

  12. [20]

    Swin-umamba: Mamba-based unet with imagenet-based pretraining,

    J. Liu, H. Yang, H.-Y . Zhou, Y . Xi, L. Yu, C. Li, Y . Liang, G. Shi, Y . Yu, S. Zhanget al., “Swin-umamba: Mamba-based unet with imagenet-based pretraining,” inMICCAI’24, 2024, pp. 615–625

    2024

  13. [21]

    Vmamba: Visual state space model,

    Y . Liu, Y . Tian, Y . Zhao, H. Yu, L. Xie, Y . Wang, Q. Ye, J. Jiao, and Y . Liu, “Vmamba: Visual state space model,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 37, pp. 103 031–103 063, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,

    Z. Liu, Y . Lin, Y . Cao, H. Hu, Y . Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo, “Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows,” inICCV’21, 2021, pp. 10 012–10 022

    2021

  15. [23]

    Transbts: Multimodal brain tumor segmentation using transformer,

    W. Wenxuan, C. Chen, D. Meng, Y . Hong, Z. Sen, and L. Jiangyun, “Transbts: Multimodal brain tumor segmentation using transformer,” in MICCAI’21, 2021, pp. 109–119

    2021

  16. [24]

    Csfwinformer: Cross-space- frequency window transformer for mirror detection,

    Z. Xie, S. Wang, Q. Yu, X. Tan, and Y . Xie, “Csfwinformer: Cross-space- frequency window transformer for mirror detection,”IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, vol. 33, pp. 1853–1867, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Frequency- domain deep guided image denoising,

    Z. Sheng, X. Liu, S.-Y . Cao, H.-L. Shen, and H. Zhang, “Frequency- domain deep guided image denoising,”IEEE Transactions on Multime- dia, vol. 25, pp. 6767–6781, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Efficient frequency domain- based transformers for high-quality image deblurring,

    L. Kong, J. Dong, J. Ge, M. Li, and J. Pan, “Efficient frequency domain- based transformers for high-quality image deblurring,” inCVPR’23, 2023, pp. 5886–5895. IEEE TRANSACTION, VOL. 99, NO. 99, JANUARY 2026 13

    2023

  19. [27]

    A complete review on image denoising tech- niques for medical images,

    A. Kaur and G. Dong, “A complete review on image denoising tech- niques for medical images,”Neural Processing Letters, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 7807–7850, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    A global-frequency-domain network for medical image segmentation,

    P. Li, R. Zhou, J. He, S. Zhao, and Y . Tian, “A global-frequency-domain network for medical image segmentation,”Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 164, p. 107290, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Medical image segmentation based on frequency domain decomposition svd linear attention,

    L. Qiong, L. Chaofan, T. Jinnan, C. Liping, and S. Jianxiang, “Medical image segmentation based on frequency domain decomposition svd linear attention,”Scientific Reports, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 2833, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Deep fourier-based exposure correction network with spatial- frequency interaction,

    J. Huang, Y . Liu, F. Zhao, K. Yan, J. Zhang, Y . Huang, M. Zhou, and Z. Xiong, “Deep fourier-based exposure correction network with spatial- frequency interaction,” inECCV’22, 2022, pp. 163–180

    2022

  23. [31]

    Fcnn: Fourier convo- lutional neural networks,

    H. Pratt, B. Williams, F. Coenen, and Y . Zheng, “Fcnn: Fourier convo- lutional neural networks,” inECML PKDD’17, 2017, pp. 786–798

    2017

  24. [32]

    Adaptively learning low-high frequency information integration for pan- sharpening,

    M. Zhou, J. Huang, C. Li, H. Yu, K. Yan, N. Zheng, and F. Zhao, “Adaptively learning low-high frequency information integration for pan- sharpening,” inACM MM’22, 2022, pp. 3375–3384

    2022

  25. [33]

    Reducing domain gap in frequency and spatial domain for cross-modality domain adaptation on medical image segmentation,

    S. Liu, S. Yin, L. Qu, and M. Wang, “Reducing domain gap in frequency and spatial domain for cross-modality domain adaptation on medical image segmentation,” inAAAI’23, 2023, pp. 1719–1727

    2023

  26. [34]

    Burstormer: Burst image restoration and enhancement transformer,

    A. Dudhane, S. W. Zamir, S. Khan, F. S. Khan, and M.-H. Yang, “Burstormer: Burst image restoration and enhancement transformer,” in CVPR’23. IEEE, 2023, pp. 5703–5712

    2023

  27. [35]

    Sffnet: A wavelet-based spatial and frequency domain fusion network for remote sensing segmentation,

    Y . Yang, G. Yuan, and J. Li, “Sffnet: A wavelet-based spatial and frequency domain fusion network for remote sensing segmentation,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 2024

    2024

  28. [36]

    Fremae: Fourier transform meets masked autoencoders for medical image segmentation,

    W. Wang, J. Wang, C. Chen, J. Jiao, L. Sun, Y . Cai, S. Song, and J. Li, “Fremae: Fourier transform meets masked autoencoders for medical image segmentation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10864, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces,

    A. Gu, K. Goel, and C. R ´e, “Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces,” inICLR’22, 2022

    2022

  30. [38]

    Simplified state space layers for sequence modeling,

    J. T. Smith, A. Warrington, and S. W. Linderman, “Simplified state space layers for sequence modeling,” inICLR’23, 2023

    2023

  31. [39]

    Vision mamba: A comprehensive survey and taxonomy,

    X. Liu, C. Zhang, F. Huang, S. Xia, G. Wang, and L. Zhang, “Vision mamba: A comprehensive survey and taxonomy,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    Medmamba: Vision mamba for medical image classification,

    Y . Yue and Z. Li, “Medmamba: Vision mamba for medical image classification,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.03849, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Vision mamba: efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model,

    L. Zhu, B. Liao, Q. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Liu, and X. Wang, “Vision mamba: efficient visual representation learning with bidirectional state space model,” inICML’24, 2024, pp. 62 429–62 442

    2024

  34. [42]

    Vision mamba in remote sensing: A comprehensive survey of techniques, applications and outlook,

    M. Bao, S. Lyu, Z. Xu, H. Zhou, J. Ren, S. Xiang, X. Li, and G. Cheng, “Vision mamba in remote sensing: A comprehensive survey of techniques, applications and outlook,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00630, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Fft based approaches in micromechanics: fundamentals, methods and applications,

    S. Lucarini, M. V . Upadhyay, and J. Segurado, “Fft based approaches in micromechanics: fundamentals, methods and applications,”Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 023002, 2021

    2021

  36. [44]

    A review of nonlinear fft-based computational homog- enization methods,

    M. Schneider, “A review of nonlinear fft-based computational homog- enization methods,”Acta Mechanica, vol. 232, no. 6, pp. 2051–2100, 2021

    2021

  37. [45]

    Fast fourier convolution,

    L. Chi, B. Jiang, and Y . Mu, “Fast fourier convolution,”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 33, pp. 4479–4488, 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    J. S. Walker,Fast fourier transforms. CRC press, 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    Localmamba: Visual state space model with windowed selective scan,

    T. Huang, X. Pei, S. You, F. Wang, C. Qian, and C. Xu, “Localmamba: Visual state space model with windowed selective scan,” inECCV’24, 2024, pp. 12–22

    2024

  40. [48]

    Cross-entropy loss functions: Theoretical analysis and applications,

    A. Mao, M. Mohri, and Y . Zhong, “Cross-entropy loss functions: Theoretical analysis and applications,” inICML’23. PMLR, 2023, pp. 23 803–23 828

    2023

  41. [49]

    Can cross entropy loss be robust to label noise?

    L. Feng, S. Shu, Z. Lin, F. Lv, L. Li, and B. An, “Can cross entropy loss be robust to label noise?” inIJCAI’21, 2021, pp. 2206–2212

    2021

  42. [50]

    The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats),

    B. H. Menze, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, J. Kalpathy-Cramer, K. Farahani, J. Kirby, Y . Burren, N. Porz, J. Slotboom, R. Wiestet al., “The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (brats),”IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1993–2024, 2014

    1993

  43. [51]

    The brain tumor segmentation (brats) challenge 2023: focus on pediatrics (cbtn-connect-dipgr-asnr-miccai brats-peds),

    A. F. Kazerooni, N. Khalili, X. Liu, D. Haldar, Z. Jiang, S. M. Anwar, J. Albrecht, M. Adewole, U. Anazodo, H. Andersonet al., “The brain tumor segmentation (brats) challenge 2023: focus on pediatrics (cbtn-connect-dipgr-asnr-miccai brats-peds),”arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.17033, 2024

    2023 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma mri collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features,

    S. Bakas, H. Akbari, A. Sotiras, M. Bilello, M. Rozycki, J. S. Kirby, J. B. Freymann, K. Farahani, and C. Davatzikos, “Advancing the cancer genome atlas glioma mri collections with expert segmentation labels and radiomic features,”Scientific data, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2017

    2017

  45. [53]

    Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge,

    S. Bakas, M. Reyes, A. Jakab, S. Bauer, M. Rempfler, A. Crimi, R. T. Shinohara, C. Berger, S. M. Ha, M. Rozyckiet al., “Identifying the best machine learning algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, progression assessment, and overall survival prediction in the brats challenge...

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Miccai multi-atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault– workshop and challenge,

    B. Landman, Z. Xu, J. Igelsias, M. Styner, T. Langerak, and A. Klein, “Miccai multi-atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault– workshop and challenge,” inMICCAI’15 Multi-Atlas Labeling Beyond Cranial Vault—Workshop Challenge, vol. 5, 2015, p. 12

    2015

  47. [55]

    Totalsegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in ct images,

    J. Wasserthal, H.-C. Breit, M. T. Meyer, M. Pradella, D. Hinck, A. W. Sauter, T. Heye, D. T. Boll, J. Cyriac, S. Yanget al., “Totalsegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomic structures in ct images,”Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, vol. 5, no. 5, p. e230024, 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    Superlightnet: Lightweight param- eter aggregation network for multimodal brain tumor segmentation,

    F. Yu, J. Cao, L. Liu, and M. Jiang, “Superlightnet: Lightweight param- eter aggregation network for multimodal brain tumor segmentation,” in CVPR’25, 2025, pp. 5197–5206

    2025

  49. [57]

    Swin-unet: Unet-like pure transformer for medical image segmenta- tion,

    H. Cao, Y . Wang, J. Chen, D. Jiang, X. Zhang, Q. Tian, and M. Wang, “Swin-unet: Unet-like pure transformer for medical image segmenta- tion,” inECCV’22, 2022, pp. 205–218

    2022

  50. [58]

    Segmamba: Long-range sequential modeling mamba for 3d medical image segmentation,

    Z. Xing, T. Ye, Y . Yang, G. Liu, and L. Zhu, “Segmamba: Long-range sequential modeling mamba for 3d medical image segmentation,” in MICCAI’24, 2024, pp. 578–588

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.