Advantages of Co-locating Quantum-HPC Platforms: A Survey for Near-Future Industrial Applications

Daigo Honda; Jun Towada; Junya Ishikawa; Kenichi Matsuzaki; Masahiko Kiminami; Naoki Yoshioka; Naoto Aoki; Nobuyasu Ito; Satoshi Miyata; Tadahiro Chujo

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Advantages of Co-locating Quantum-HPC Platforms: A Survey for Near-Future Industrial Applications

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Co-locating quantum and HPC systems measurably speeds hybrid jobs

desk verdict A clear, plausible survey abstract on quantum-HPC co-location, but the supplied body is unreadable and the causal claim outruns the survey design. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04171 v1 pith:YCWVLP3Z submitted 2025-08-06 quant-ph cs.DCcs.ET

Daigo Honda , Yuta Nishiyama , Junya Ishikawa , Kenichi Matsuzaki , Satoshi Miyata , Tadahiro Chujo , Yasuhisa Yamamoto , Masahiko Kiminami

show 5 more authors

Taro Kato Jun Towada Naoki Yoshioka Naoto Aoki Nobuyasu Ito

This is my paper

classification quant-phcs.DCcs.ET

keywords quantum-HPCco-locationhybridquantum-classicalcomputingjobschedulinglatencyreductionerrormitigationcircuitpartitioningnear-futureindustrialapplications

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper surveys emerging platforms that place quantum computers and high-performance classical computers in the same facility, and asks whether co-location gives near-future industrial users a real advantage. It argues yes: physical proximity cuts latency and raises bandwidth between the two systems, and it enables an advanced job scheduler to treat quantum and classical work as one unified queue, improving overall hybrid job throughput. The paper also contends that large real-world hybrid quantum-classical algorithms can require HPC-level classical compute for circuit partitioning, optimization, and error mitigation. A sympathetic reader would take away that integrated quantum-HPC platforms are worth building, rather than treating the quantum processor as a remote accelerator.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is co-location itself: physically placing the quantum computer and the HPC system in the same facility. Co-location shortens the network path between classical and quantum execution, and it makes possible advanced job scheduling that coordinates quantum and classical workloads in a single system. The survey treats these together as the cause of improved hybrid job throughput.

What would settle it

Run the same hybrid workload with the same scheduler software on two configurations: co-located quantum and HPC systems versus a remote quantum service accessed over a standard network. If the throughput advantage disappears or drops sharply when the software is held constant, then the paper's attribution of gains to physical co-location is undermined.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that co-locating quantum computers with HPC systems yields measurable improvements in overall hybrid job throughput, and that HPC-level computational resources are necessary for executing large-scale real-world hybrid algorithms. The paper reaches this claim through a systematic survey of emerging quantum-HPC platforms, examining three mechanisms: latency reduction, bandwidth enhancement, and advanced job scheduling. It also assesses how HPC capabilities support hybrid algorithm performance, large-scale error mitigation, and complex quantum circuit partitioning and optimization.

Load-bearing premise

The surveyed platforms, benchmarks, and workload patterns are representative of near-future industrial applications, so the throughput conclusions transfer from testbeds to production, and the gains are caused by physical co-location rather than by scheduling software alone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

It would be measurable: hybrid job throughput rises when the classical and quantum systems share a facility and a scheduler, not just an API.
Large-scale industrial hybrid algorithms should expect to depend on HPC-class classical resources, not only on quantum hardware.
System builders should invest in integrated quantum-HPC platforms and unified scheduling rather than remote quantum access alone.
Latency and bandwidth between the two systems become first-order design parameters for near-future hybrid workloads.
Error-mitigation and circuit-optimization workloads are natural early beneficiaries of co-location because they are compute-hungry classical steps inside hybrid loops.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the throughput gains are driven mainly by advanced scheduling software, then physical proximity may be a convenient enabler rather than the true cause; a software-only scheduler on a remote platform might reproduce part of the gain.
The latency and bandwidth argument suggests a testable rule: hybrid algorithms with many short quantum-classical round trips will benefit most from co-location, while longer-running quantum circuits will benefit less.
Because the paper surveys emerging platforms, an implication left implicit is that co-location may also become a factor in operating-cost and data-governance decisions, not just performance.
A direct extension would be to benchmark identical hybrid workloads across co-located versus remote configurations while holding the scheduler software fixed, to isolate the proximity effect.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Quick note on arXiv:2508.04171. The abstract is clear and asks a real question: does co-locating quantum computers with HPC systems help near-future industrial workloads? That is worth knowing. The authors organize the survey around latency, bandwidth, and job scheduling, and they add HPC-side value for error mitigation and circuit partitioning. That is a sensible frame, and the topic is timely for HPC centers and industrial users.

What the paper is not: it is a survey, not a new measurement. The abstract's conclusion—'co-locating...can yield measurable improvements in overall hybrid job throughput'—is stronger than a survey of platform reports can normally support. The stress-test note has it right: 'advanced job scheduling' is a software variable. If the surveyed platforms differ in both physical proximity and scheduler software, the throughput gains could come from the scheduler alone. The abstract does not separate those, and no effect sizes or controlled comparisons are visible. A referee should also check whether the surveyed platforms represent production industrial workloads, not just testbeds.

The bigger problem is the artifact itself. The full text supplied is encoding-corrupted mojibake, and it contains a stray arXiv header from a different paper. I cannot audit the platform inventory, the inclusion criteria, or the citations. On the evidence in front of me, the only assessable portion is the abstract.

None of this is fatal to the project. A survey with a documented protocol and a careful distinction between physical co-location and software coordination would be a legitimate contribution. The abstract alone is not enough to establish the causal claim. But the paper deserves a serious referee if the authors can provide an uncorrupted full text. On the current artifact, I would return it to the authors for a clean version before sending it out. For the reading group, I would hold off until we have a readable copy.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a systematic survey of emerging quantum-HPC platforms that integrate quantum computers and HPC systems via co-location. The abstract states that co-location yields measurable improvements in overall hybrid job throughput, through latency reduction, bandwidth enhancement, and advanced job scheduling, and that large-scale real-world hybrid workloads require HPC-class computational resources. The full text provided for review is, however, encoding-corrupted (mojibake) and contains no recoverable narrative, equations, tables, or references. The only reviewable content is the abstract and the title.

Significance. If the claim is correct, the paper could guide near-term industrial investments in quantum-HPC integration. A credible survey showing measurable hybrid-job-throughput gains from physical co-location would be useful to both HPC centers and quantum hardware providers. The second observation, that hybrid algorithms often need HPC-level classical resources, is plausible and consistent with current literature. However, none of these claims can be checked from the submitted material: no protocol, no platform inventory, no effect sizes, and no comparison baselines are visible. The significance is therefore conditional on a readable and verifiable manuscript being supplied.

major comments (3)

[Full text (entire manuscript)] The manuscript body is unreadable due to encoding corruption. No section, equation, table, or figure can be located or cited. This prevents verification of the survey protocol, the platform list, the benchmark sources, the effect sizes, and the synthesis that underlies the abstract's central claim. The paper must be resubmitted in a readable form before substantive review is possible.
[Abstract] The abstract attributes throughput improvements to co-location ('co-locating quantum and HPC systems can yield measurable improvements') but lists 'advanced job scheduling' as one of the three examined mechanisms. Scheduling software is not inherently tied to physical proximity; it can be deployed in a distributed setting. If the surveyed co-located platforms also deploy newer scheduling software, the observed gains may be due to software rather than co-location. The paper does not, in the abstract, provide any evidence that scheduler policy/version was held constant or statistically controlled. This is a causal-attribution concern that must be addressed with a concrete separation of physical-proximity effects from software effects.
[Abstract / Survey methodology] The abstract asserts 'Our findings demonstrate' and 'We also observe' without presenting the study design, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of platforms surveyed, or quantitative results. For a survey making a measurable-througput claim, the paper must show at least a summary of the collected data (e.g., effect sizes, confidence intervals, or at minimum a comparison table) and the criteria for selecting sources. None of this is visible in the provided material, and the corrupted full text cannot be checked.

minor comments (2)

[Whole document] The submission contains pervasive non-printable characters and a stray arXiv identifier (arXiv:2508.04172v1) that does not belong to this paper. The authors should regenerate the manuscript from source to avoid any unintended inclusion of unrelated text.
[Abstract] The phrase 'large-scale real-world problems' is undefined. A survey should state what 'large-scale' means (e.g., number of qubits, circuit depth, classical simulation cost) and in what sense HPC-class resources are 'required' (e.g., demonstrated versus argued from complexity).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No demonstrable circularity: the paper is a survey whose conclusions are syntheses of observed platform data, and no derivation or self-citation chain can be shown to reduce to its own inputs from the available text.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation. The abstract states that the authors examined the impact of co-location on latency, bandwidth, and scheduling, and then reports that co-location can yield measurable throughput improvements. That is an empirical synthesis and causal attribution, not a mathematical derivation. No equation, fitted parameter, or uniqueness theorem is quoted in the readable portions, and the body text as supplied is encoding-corrupted mojibake, so no specific reduction of the form 'Eq. X = Eq. Y by construction' or 'parameter P is fitted from the predicted quantity' can be exhibited. The reader's concern that 'advanced job scheduling' might be a confounder is a correctness and causal-identification concern, not a circularity concern, because the survey's conclusion is not definitionally equivalent to its evidence. Similarly, the generalization from surveyed testbeds to near-future industrial workloads is an external-validity limitation, not a circular step. Under the hard rule that circularity may only be claimed when the paper can be quoted and the specific reduction exhibited, no circular step is identifiable here. The inability to audit the corrupted full text is an evidence limitation, not evidence of circularity; therefore the honest finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review. No fitted parameters, derivations, or invented entities are visible. The ledger records the two implicit premises on which the survey's generalization rests. Whether the conclusion reduces to the conclusions of its own sources (higher circularity burden) could only be checked in the full text.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The surveyed quantum-HPC platforms, benchmarks, and workload patterns are representative of near-future industrial applications
The abstract generalizes from the surveyed platforms to 'near-future industrial applications'; representativeness is assumed and cannot be checked from the abstract.
domain assumption Throughput gains are attributable to physical co-location rather than to software scheduling improvements alone
The abstract credits co-location for improved throughput while listing 'advanced job scheduling' as one of the examined mechanisms; the causal attribution to proximity is an implicit premise.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Advantages of Co-locating Quantum-HPC Platforms: A Survey for Near-Future Industrial Applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YCWVLP3Z

@misc{pith2026250804171,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Advantages of Co-locating Quantum-HPC Platforms: A Survey for Near-Future Industrial Applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YCWVLP3Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04171}
}

read the original abstract

We conducted a systematic survey of emerging quantum-HPC platforms, which integrate quantum computers and High-Performance Computing (HPC) systems through co-location. Currently, it remains unclear whether such platforms provide tangible benefits for near-future industrial applications. To address this, we examined the impact of co-location on latency reduction, bandwidth enhancement, and advanced job scheduling. Additionally, we assessed how HPC-level capabilities could enhance hybrid algorithm performance, support large-scale error mitigation, and facilitate complex quantum circuit partitioning and optimization. Our findings demonstrate that co-locating quantum and HPC systems can yield measurable improvements in overall hybrid job throughput. We also observe that large-scale real-world problems can require HPC-level computational resources for executing hybrid algorithms.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Performance Model for Hybrid Quantum-Classical Workflows
quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

A two-level runtime model decomposes hybrid quantum-classical cycles into quantum, classical, and communication time, allowing a communication-to-computation ratio to classify workflows as compute- or communication-bound.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

author author M. A. \ Nielsen \ and\ author I. L. \ Chuang ,\ @noop title Quantum computation and quantum information \ ( publisher Cambridge university press ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

2010
[2]

Montanaro ,\ title title Quantum algorithms: an overview ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

author author A. Montanaro ,\ title title Quantum algorithms: an overview ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page 2016
[3]

Preskill ,\ title title Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond ,\ @noop journal journal Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

author author J. Preskill ,\ title title Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond ,\ @noop journal journal Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

work page 2018
[4]

Cerezo , author A

author author M. Cerezo , author A. Arrasmith , author R. Babbush , author S. C. \ Benjamin , author S. Endo , author K. Fujii , author J. R. \ McClean , author K. Mitarai , author X. Yuan , author L. Cincio , et al. ,\ title title Variational quantum algorithms ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 625 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021
[5]

Bharti , author A

author author K. Bharti , author A. Cervera-Lierta , author T. H. \ Kyaw , author T. Haug , author S. Alperin-Lea , author A. Anand , author M. Degroote , author H. Heimonen , author J. S. \ Kottmann , author T. Menke , et al. ,\ title title Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 94 ,\ pages...

work page 2022
[6]

Schneider \ and\ author I

author author J. Schneider \ and\ author I. Smalley ,\ @noop title What is quantum-centric supercomputing? ,\ howpublished https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/quantum-centric-supercomputing ( year 2024 ) NoStop

work page 2024
[7]

Alexeev , author M

author author Y. Alexeev , author M. Amsler , author M. A. \ Barroca , author S. Bassini , author T. Battelle , author D. Camps , author D. Casanova , author Y. J. \ Choi , author F. T. \ Chong , author C. Chung , et al. ,\ title title Quantum-centric supercomputing for materials science: A perspective on challenges and future directions ,\ @noop journal ...

work page 2024
[8]

author author CESGA ,\ @noop title Quantum computer of 32 qubits for the CESGA ,\ howpublished https://www.cesga.es/en/computador-cuantico-de-32-cubits-para-el-cesga-2/ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

work page 2023

Show all 74 references

[9]

author author Cleveland Clinic ,\ @noop title Quantum computing debuts at C leveland C linic ,\ howpublished https://consultqd.clevelandclinic.org/quantum-computing-debuts-at-cleveland-clinic ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[10]

author author RIKEN ,\ @noop title Project for integrated use of quantum computers and supercomputers ,\ howpublished https://www.riken.jp/en/news_pubs/news/2023/20231122_1/index.html ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[11]

author author JHPC-quantum ,\ @noop title Research and development of quantum-supercomputers hybrid platform for exploration of uncharted computable capabilities ,\ howpublished https://jhpc-quantum.org/en/about/ ( year Accessed: 2025/5/2 ) NoStop

2025
[12]

author author National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST) ,\ @noop title Reinforcing collaboration for industrialization of quantum technology through MOU between AIST and QuEra ,\ howpublished https://www.aist.go.jp/aist_e/news/topics/au20241024_en...

2024
[13]

author author High-Performance Computer and Quantum Simulator hybrid (HPCQS) ,\ @noop title HPCQS receives second 100+ qubit quantum processor unit from P asqal ,\ howpublished https://www.hpcqs.eu/news/hpcqs-receives-second-100-qubit-quantum-processor-unit-from-pasqal ( year ...

2024
[14]

author author University of Innsbruck ,\ @noop title Supercomputer and quantum computer in harmony ,\ howpublished https://www.uibk.ac.at/en/newsroom/2024/supercomputer-and-quantum-computer-in-harmony/ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[15]

author author IT4Innovations National Supercomputing Center ,\ @noop title Europe takes a quantum leap: LUMI-Q consortium signs contract to establish quantum computer in the C zech R epublic ,\ howpublished https://www.it4i.cz/en/about/infoservice/news/europe-takes-a-quantum-l...

2024
[16]

author author Forschungszentrum Jülich ,\ @noop title Expansion of J ülich's quantum computer infrastructure ,\ howpublished https://www.fz-juelich.de/en/news/archive/press-release/2024/expansion-of-julich2019s-quantum-computer-infrastructure ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[17]

author author IQM Quantum Computers ,\ @noop title Germany launches its first hybrid quantum computer at L eibniz S upercomputing C entre ,\ howpublished https://meetiqm.com/press-releases/germany-launches-its-first-hybrid-quantum-computer-at-leibniz-supercomputing-centre/ ( y...

2024
[18]

author author Quantum Brilliance ,\ @noop title Q uantum B rilliance announces strategic collaboration with O ak R idge N ational L aboratory ,\ howpublished https://quantumbrilliance.com/press-release/quantum-brilliance-announces-strategic-collaboration-with-oak-ridge-nationa...

2024
[19]

author author Poznan Supercomputing and Networking Center ,\ @noop title PSNC and ORCA computing announce collaboration with NVIDIA to accelerate the development of hybrid quantum classical high-performance computing ,\ howpublished https://www.psnc.pl/psnc-and-orca-computing-...

2024
[20]

author author European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) ,\ @noop title Signature of the procurement contract for L ucy, a new EuroHPC quantum computer located in F rance ,\ howpublished https://eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/signature-procurement-contract-lucy-n...

2024
[21]

author author European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU) ,\ @noop title Signature of the procurement contract for the EuroHPC quantum computer located in I taly ,\ howpublished https://eurohpc-ju.europa.eu/signature-procurement-contract-eurohpc-quantum-...

2025
[22]

author author Pawsey Supercomputing Research Centre ,\ @noop title P awsey and Q uantum B rilliance advance quantum integration with novel hybrid workflow accelerated by NVIDIA ,\ howpublished https://pawsey.org.au/pawsey-and-quantum-brilliance-advance-quantum-integration-with...

2025
[23]

author author K. A. \ Britt \ and\ author T. S. \ Humble ,\ title title High-performance computing with quantum processing units ,\ @noop journal journal ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems ( JETC ) \ volume 13 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[24]

Cai , author R

author author Z. Cai , author R. Babbush , author S. C. \ Benjamin , author S. Endo , author W. J. \ Huggins , author Y. Li , author J. R. \ McClean ,\ and\ author T. E. \ O’Brien ,\ title title Quantum error mitigation ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volu...

2023
[25]

Bravyi , author G

author author S. Bravyi , author G. Smith ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Smolin ,\ title title Trading classical and quantum computational resources ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 6 ,\ pages 021043 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

2016
[26]

Peng , author A

author author T. Peng , author A. W. \ Harrow , author M. Ozols ,\ and\ author X. Wu ,\ title title Simulating large quantum circuits on a small quantum computer ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 125 ,\ pages 150504 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

2020
[27]

Ge , author W

author author Y. Ge , author W. Wenjie , author C. Yuheng , author P. Kaisen , author L. Xudong , author Z. Zixiang , author W. Yuhan , author W. Ruocheng ,\ and\ author Y. Junchi ,\ title title Quantum circuit synthesis and compilation optimization: Overview and prospects ,\ ...

2024
[28]

Peruzzo , author J

author author A. Peruzzo , author J. McClean , author P. Shadbolt , author M.-H. \ Yung , author X.-Q. \ Zhou , author P. J. \ Love , author A. Aspuru-Guzik ,\ and\ author J. L. \ O’brien ,\ title title A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor ,\ @noop j...

2014
[29]

Mitarai , author M

author author K. Mitarai , author M. Negoro , author M. Kitagawa ,\ and\ author K. Fujii ,\ title title Quantum circuit learning ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 98 ,\ pages 032309 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018
[30]

Farhi \ and\ author H

author author E. Farhi \ and\ author H. Neven ,\ title title Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06002 \ ( year 2018 ) NoStop

2018 arXiv
[31]

author author M. N. \ Farooqi \ and\ author M. Ruefenacht ,\ title title Exploring hybrid classical-quantum compute systems through simulation ,\ in\ @noop booktitle 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) ,\ Vol. volume 2 \ ( organization...

2023
[32]

author author FS Blog ,\ @noop title RoCE technology in high-performance computing: Insights and applications ,\ howpublished https://www.fs.com/blog/roce-technology-in-highperformance-computing-insights-and-applications-6925.html ( year Accessed: 2025/2/21 ) NoStop

2025
[33]

Mih \'a likov \'a , author M

author author I. Mih \'a likov \'a , author M. Pivoluska , author M. Plesch , author M. Fri \'a k , author D. Nagaj ,\ and\ author M. S ob ,\ title title The cost of improving the precision of the variational quantum eigensolver for quantum chemistry ,\ @noop journal journal N...

2022
[34]

Zhu , author S

author author L. Zhu , author S. Liang , author C. Yang ,\ and\ author X. Li ,\ title title Optimizing shot assignment in variational quantum eigensolver measurement ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation \ volume 20 ,\ pages 2390 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[35]

Delgado \ and\ author K

author author A. Delgado \ and\ author K. E. \ Hamilton ,\ title title Unsupervised quantum circuit learning in high energy physics ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review D \ volume 106 ,\ pages 096006 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[36]

Miroszewski , author M

author author A. Miroszewski , author M. F. \ Asiani , author J. Mielczarek , author B. L. \ Saux ,\ and\ author J. Nalepa ,\ title title In search of quantum advantage: Estimating the number of shots in quantum kernel methods ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2407...

2024 arXiv
[37]

\ Huang , author M

author author H.-Y. \ Huang , author M. Broughton , author M. Mohseni , author R. Babbush , author S. Boixo , author H. Neven ,\ and\ author J. R. \ McClean ,\ title title Power of data in quantum machine learning ,\ @noop journal journal Nature communications \ volume 12 ,\ p...

2021
[38]

u bler , author S. Buchholz ,\ and\ author B. Sch \

author author J. K \"u bler , author S. Buchholz ,\ and\ author B. Sch \"o lkopf ,\ title title The inductive bias of quantum kernels ,\ @noop journal journal Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems \ volume 34 ,\ pages 12661 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[39]

Thanasilp , author S

author author S. Thanasilp , author S. Wang , author M. Cerezo ,\ and\ author Z. Holmes ,\ title title Exponential concentration in quantum kernel methods ,\ @noop journal journal Nature communications \ volume 15 ,\ pages 5200 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[40]

,\ @noop title IBM Quantum Documentation : Job limits ,\ howpublished https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/job-limits ( year Accessed: 2025/2/21 ) NoStop

author author IBM Corp. ,\ @noop title IBM Quantum Documentation : Job limits ,\ howpublished https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/job-limits ( year Accessed: 2025/2/21 ) NoStop

2025
[41]

100 bits \( \) 1000 shots \(=\) 12,500 bytes

note Assuming that NISQ computers possess between 100 and 1000 qubits, we estimated the data volume of bit strings generated by 1000 shots. 100 bits \( \) 1000 shots \(=\) 12,500 bytes. 1000 bits \( \) 1000 shots \(=\) 125,000 bytes. Stop
[42]

Takagi , author H

author author R. Takagi , author H. Tajima ,\ and\ author M. Gu ,\ title title Universal sampling lower bounds for quantum error mitigation ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 131 ,\ pages 210602 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[43]

Tsubouchi , author T

author author K. Tsubouchi , author T. Sagawa ,\ and\ author N. Yoshioka ,\ title title Universal cost bound of quantum error mitigation based on quantum estimation theory ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 131 ,\ pages 210601 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[44]

\ Lu , author M.-C

author author P.-J. \ Lu , author M.-C. \ Lai ,\ and\ author J.-S. \ Chang ,\ title title A survey of high-performance interconnection networks in high-performance computer systems ,\ @noop journal journal Electronics \ volume 11 ,\ pages 1369 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[45]

author author Science Information NETwork SINET6 ,\ @noop title About SINET ,\ howpublished https://www.sinet.ad.jp/en/aboutsinet-en ( year Accessed: 2025/2/21 ) NoStop

2025
[46]

author author L. L. \ Peterson \ and\ author B. S. \ Davie ,\ @noop title Computer Networks: A Systems Approach \ ( publisher Elsevier ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

2012
[47]

Li \ and\ author S

author author Y. Li \ and\ author S. C. \ Benjamin ,\ title title Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 7 ,\ pages 021050 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[48]

Temme , author S

author author K. Temme , author S. Bravyi ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ title title Error mitigation for short-depth quantum circuits ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 119 ,\ pages 180509 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

2017
[49]

Kim , author C

author author Y. Kim , author C. J. \ Wood , author T. J. \ Yoder , author S. T. \ Merkel , author J. M. \ Gambetta , author K. Temme ,\ and\ author A. Kandala ,\ title title Scalable error mitigation for noisy quantum circuits produces competitive expectation values ,\ @noop ...

2023
[50]

author author P. D. \ Nation , author H. Kang , author N. Sundaresan ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ title title Scalable mitigation of measurement errors on quantum computers ,\ @noop journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 040326 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[51]

Pokharel , author S

author author B. Pokharel , author S. Srinivasan , author G. Quiroz ,\ and\ author B. Boots ,\ title title Scalable measurement error mitigation via iterative bayesian unfolding ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Research \ volume 6 ,\ pages 013187 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[52]

Bravyi , author S

author author S. Bravyi , author S. Sheldon , author A. Kandala , author D. C. \ Mckay ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Gambetta ,\ title title Mitigating measurement errors in multiqubit experiments ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review A \ volume 103 ,\ pages 042605 ( year 2021 a ) NoStop

2021
[53]

Weaving , author A

author author T. Weaving , author A. Ralli , author W. M. \ Kirby , author P. J. \ Love , author S. Succi ,\ and\ author P. V. \ Coveney ,\ title title Benchmarking noisy intermediate scale quantum error mitigation strategies for ground state preparation of the HCl molecule ,\...

2023
[54]

Das , author S

author author P. Das , author S. S. \ Tannu , author P. J. \ Nair ,\ and\ author M. Qureshi ,\ title title A case for multi-programming quantum computers ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 52nd Annual IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture \ ( year 2019 )...

2019
[55]

author author G. S. \ Ravi , author K. N. \ Smith , author P. Gokhale ,\ and\ author F. T. \ Chong ,\ title title Quantum computing in the cloud: Analyzing job and machine characteristics ,\ in\ @noop booktitle 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (II...

2021
[56]

author author IBM Corp. ,\ @noop title IBM Quantum Documentation : Introduction to Q iskit R untime execution modes ,\ howpublished https://docs.quantum.ibm.com/guides/execution-modes ( year Accessed: 2025/5/2 ) NoStop

2025
[57]

author author Amazon Web Services, Inc. ,\ @noop title A mazon B raket D eveloper G uide: What is a hybrid job? ,\ howpublished https://docs.aws.amazon.com/braket/latest/developerguide/braket-what-is-hybrid-job.html ( year Accessed: 2025/2/21 ) NoStop

2025
[58]

author author T. Mori ,\ @noop title [ A ccelerating cooperative processing of quantum and classical computations! N ow available on O saka U niversity's quantum computing cloud service] R yōshi K eisan to K oten K eisan no K yōchō S hori o K ōsokuka! H andai no R yōshi K onpy...

2024
[59]

author author T. Mori ,\ @noop title [ A ccelerating quantum programs through parallel execution! N ow available on O saka U niversity's quantum computing cloud service] R yōshi P uroguramu o H eiretsu J ikkō shite K ōsokuka! H andai no R yōshi K onpyūta K uraudo S ābisu de T ...

2024
[60]

Romero-Alvarez , author J

author author J. Romero-Alvarez , author J. Alvarado-Valiente , author J. Casco-Seco , author E. Moguel , author J. Garcia-Alonso , author J. Berrocal ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Murillo ,\ title title Quantum circuit scheduler for QPU s usage optimization ,\ @noop journal journal ...

2024 arXiv
[61]

Wu , author Y

author author W. Wu , author Y. Wang , author G. Yan , author Y. Zhao , author B. Zhang ,\ and\ author J. Yan ,\ title title On reducing the execution latency of superconducting quantum processors via quantum job scheduling ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE/A...

2025
[62]

Kanno , author M

author author K. Kanno , author M. Kohda , author R. Imai , author S. Koh , author K. Mitarai , author W. Mizukami ,\ and\ author Y. O. \ Nakagawa ,\ title title Quantum-selected configuration interaction: Classical diagonalization of hamiltonians in subspaces selected by quan...

2023 arXiv
[63]

Robledo-Moreno , author M

author author J. Robledo-Moreno , author M. Motta , author H. Haas , author A. Javadi-Abhari , author P. Jurcevic , author W. Kirby , author S. Martiel , author K. Sharma , author S. Sharma , author T. Shirakawa , et al. ,\ title title Chemistry beyond the scale of exact diago...

2025
[64]

author author M. S. \ Rudolph , author J. Miller , author D. Motlagh , author J. Chen , author A. Acharya ,\ and\ author A. Perdomo-Ortiz ,\ title title Synergistic pretraining of parametrized quantum circuits via tensor networks ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications ...

2023
[65]

Tang , author T

author author W. Tang , author T. Tomesh , author M. Suchara , author J. Larson ,\ and\ author M. Martonosi ,\ title title CutQC : using small quantum computers for large quantum circuit evaluations ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 26th ACM International conference on...

2021
[66]

Tang \ and\ author M

author author W. Tang \ and\ author M. Martonosi ,\ title title Cutting quantum circuits to run on quantum and classical platforms ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.05836 \ ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022 arXiv
[67]

Boixo , author S

author author S. Boixo , author S. V. \ Isakov , author V. N. \ Smelyanskiy , author R. Babbush , author N. Ding , author Z. Jiang , author M. J. \ Bremner , author J. M. \ Martinis ,\ and\ author H. Neven ,\ title title Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices ,\...

2018
[68]

Arute , author K

author author F. Arute , author K. Arya , author R. Babbush , author D. Bacon , author J. C. \ Bardin , author R. Barends , author R. Biswas , author S. Boixo , author F. G. \ Brandao , author D. A. \ Buell , et al. ,\ title title Quantum supremacy using a programmable superco...

2019
[69]

Piveteau \ and\ author D

author author C. Piveteau \ and\ author D. Sutter ,\ title title Circuit knitting with classical communication ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE Transactions on Information Theory \ volume 70 ,\ pages 2734 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[70]

Ren , author M

author author X. Ren , author M. Zhang ,\ and\ author A. Barbalace ,\ title title A hardware-aware gate cutting framework for practical quantum circuit knitting ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 43rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Computer-Aided Design \ ( year 2...

2025
[71]

Schneider , author L

author author S. Schneider , author L. Burgholzer ,\ and\ author R. Wille ,\ title title A SAT encoding for optimal C lifford circuit synthesis ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 28th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference \ ( year 2023 )\ pp.\ pages 190--1...

2023
[72]

Aaronson \ and\ author D

author author S. Aaronson \ and\ author D. Gottesman ,\ title title Improved simulation of stabilizer circuits ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics \ volume 70 ,\ pages 052328 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

2004
[73]

Bravyi , author R

author author S. Bravyi , author R. Shaydulin , author S. Hu ,\ and\ author D. Maslov ,\ title title Clifford circuit optimization with templates and symbolic P auli gates ,\ @noop journal journal Quantum \ volume 5 ,\ pages 580 ( year 2021 b ) NoStop

2021
[74]

Peham , author N

author author T. Peham , author N. Brandl , author R. Kueng , author R. Wille ,\ and\ author L. Burgholzer ,\ title title Depth-optimal synthesis of C lifford circuits with SAT solvers ,\ in\ @noop booktitle 2023 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineeri...

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

author author M. A. \ Nielsen \ and\ author I. L. \ Chuang ,\ @noop title Quantum computation and quantum information \ ( publisher Cambridge university press ,\ year 2010 ) NoStop

2010

[2] [2]

Montanaro ,\ title title Quantum algorithms: an overview ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

author author A. Montanaro ,\ title title Quantum algorithms: an overview ,\ @noop journal journal npj Quantum Information \ volume 2 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

work page 2016

[3] [3]

Preskill ,\ title title Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond ,\ @noop journal journal Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

author author J. Preskill ,\ title title Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond ,\ @noop journal journal Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 79 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

work page 2018

[4] [4]

Cerezo , author A

author author M. Cerezo , author A. Arrasmith , author R. Babbush , author S. C. \ Benjamin , author S. Endo , author K. Fujii , author J. R. \ McClean , author K. Mitarai , author X. Yuan , author L. Cincio , et al. ,\ title title Variational quantum algorithms ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Reviews Physics \ volume 3 ,\ pages 625 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021

[5] [5]

Bharti , author A

author author K. Bharti , author A. Cervera-Lierta , author T. H. \ Kyaw , author T. Haug , author S. Alperin-Lea , author A. Anand , author M. Degroote , author H. Heimonen , author J. S. \ Kottmann , author T. Menke , et al. ,\ title title Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms ,\ @noop journal journal Reviews of Modern Physics \ volume 94 ,\ pages...

work page 2022

[6] [6]

Schneider \ and\ author I

author author J. Schneider \ and\ author I. Smalley ,\ @noop title What is quantum-centric supercomputing? ,\ howpublished https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/quantum-centric-supercomputing ( year 2024 ) NoStop

work page 2024

[7] [7]

Alexeev , author M

author author Y. Alexeev , author M. Amsler , author M. A. \ Barroca , author S. Bassini , author T. Battelle , author D. Camps , author D. Casanova , author Y. J. \ Choi , author F. T. \ Chong , author C. Chung , et al. ,\ title title Quantum-centric supercomputing for materials science: A perspective on challenges and future directions ,\ @noop journal ...

work page 2024

[8] [8]

author author CESGA ,\ @noop title Quantum computer of 32 qubits for the CESGA ,\ howpublished https://www.cesga.es/en/computador-cuantico-de-32-cubits-para-el-cesga-2/ ( year 2023 ) NoStop

work page 2023