Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 1 minor 56 references

FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and Challenging

T0 review · 4 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read FinMMR, a new bilingual multimodal financial reasoning benchmark, reports that the best multimodal AI model scores only 53% on its Hard questions.

desk verdict The submission is not the paper: the abstract describes a financial multimodal benchmark, but the full text is a physics paper on valley Chern numbers, making every claim unverifiable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.04625 v1 pith:FJQEZZ7P submitted 2025-08-06 cs.CV cs.CE

Zichen Tang , Haihong E , Jiacheng Liu , Zhongjun Yang , Rongjin Li , Zihua Rong , Haoyang He , Zhuodi Hao
show 13 more authors
Xinyang Hu Kun Ji Ziyan Ma Mengyuan Ji Jun Zhang Chenghao Ma Qianhe Zheng Yang Liu Yiling Huang Xinyi Hu Qing Huang Zijian Xie Shiyao Peng
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.CE
keywords multimodallargelanguagemodelsfinancialnumericalreasoningbenchmarkbilingualchartunderstandingmulti-stepChinesereportsMLLMevaluation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that financial numerical reasoning for AI models is best measured in a multimodal form: questions should come with the tables, charts, and figures a human analyst would actually read. It introduces FinMMR, a bilingual benchmark of 4.3K questions and 8.7K images across 14 financial subdomains and 14 visual categories, built partly by converting existing benchmarks and partly from new questions based on Chinese financial research reports. The authors' central empirical claim is that current multimodal large language models are far from solving the hard subset: the best model reaches only 53% accuracy. If that holds, FinMMR gives the community a concrete stress test for whether vision-language models can do reliable numerical work on real financial documents.

What carries the argument

The benchmark itself is the central object. It is assembled by transforming existing financial reasoning benchmarks into multimodal questions that add the relevant visual alongside the original question, and by constructing new questions from recent Chinese financial research reports. The 14-category image set and the Hard split are what force a model to move from text-only reasoning to integrated image-text numerical reasoning, requiring multi-step precise arithmetic combined with financial domain knowledge.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of FinMMR Hard questions and have two independent expert annotators derive answers from the images alone. If labels frequently fail to match expert answers, or if a model given text-only transcriptions of the images reaches the same 53% accuracy, then the benchmark's difficulty would be attributable to its setup rather than to multimodal reasoning.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, FinMMR's discovery is a measurement: when questions demand multi-step numerical answers by combining financial knowledge with understanding of images and text, the strongest available multimodal large language models fail roughly half the time on the Hard split. The benchmark itself contains 4.3K questions and 8.7K images, with 14 image categories including tables, bar charts, and ownership-structure charts, and 14 financial subdomains such as corporate finance, banking, and industry analysis. The authors claim this makes FinMMR more multimodal, more comprehensive, and more challenging than existing financial reasoning benchmarks, and they present the 53% Hard accuracy as e

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark's validity rests on the assumption that turning existing text-based financial questions into image-based questions preserves the original correct answers, and that the Hard subset's difficulty is a property of the questions themselves rather than a post-hoc selection based on model performance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If FinMMR is valid, current multimodal AI models are not yet reliable for numerical financial questions that require reading an image, because even the best model misses nearly half of the Hard questions.
  • The benchmark provides a single shared test across 14 financial subdomains, so progress can be tracked in a domain-specific way rather than on generic visual question answering.
  • The bilingual and Chinese-report components make FinMMR useful for testing whether models can handle numerical reasoning across different financial reporting contexts.
  • A model that improves on FinMMR Hard would need to combine chart reading, financial knowledge, and multi-step arithmetic, making the benchmark a diagnostic tool for separating those skills.
  • The reported 53% ceiling implies large headroom for future work, and the benchmark is designed so that score improvements are tied to measurable multimodal numerical reasoning gains.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If text-only versions of the same questions score substantially higher than their multimodal counterparts, that would pinpoint visual-to-numerical alignment, rather than financial knowledge, as the weak link; this comparison is not reported in the abstract but follows directly from the benchmark's design.
  • A natural diagnostic extension is to break FinMMR scores down by image category: ownership-structure charts likely require different reasoning than bar charts, and category-level accuracy would tell model developers where to focus.
  • Before the 53% figure is treated as a hard benchmark number, the transformation pipeline should be audited for label integrity and training-data leakage; the abstract does not report those checks.
  • FinMMR could be extended to measure whether wrong answers are due to misread chart values, arithmetic errors, or missing financial knowledge, since those failures demand different fixes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 1 minor

Summary. The submission is, in effect, only an abstract. It announces FinMMR, a bilingual multimodal benchmark for financial numerical reasoning, with 4.3K questions, 8.7K images, 14 categories, 14 financial subdomains, and a reported best MLLM accuracy of 53.0% on the Hard split. The accompanying full text is an unrelated condensed-matter paper (arXiv:2508.04620v2) on Floquet-driven graphene–hBN moiré systems. No dataset construction, annotation procedure, validation protocol, baseline description, or evaluation details for FinMMR are present in the submitted file.

Significance. If the abstract's claims are true, FinMMR would fill a genuine gap: a bilingual multimodal numerical reasoning benchmark in finance with image-based questions and broad subdomain coverage, and the 53.0% Hard accuracy would suggest substantial headroom for current MLLMs. These are potentially interesting contributions. However, because the manuscript body is absent, none of the claims can be checked. The submitted text contains no code, dataset, machine-checked proofs, or reproducible evaluation artifacts. The significance therefore remains conditional.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (all sections)] The body of the submitted manuscript is arXiv:2508.04620v2, a physics paper on valley Chern numbers in non-twisted graphene–hBN superlattices. It has no relation to FinMMR. Consequently, the abstract's central claims—the 4.3K/8.7K counts, the 14 categories/subdomains, the transformation of existing benchmarks, and the 53.0% Hard-accuracy result—are entirely unsupported. This is a load-bearing gap, not a formatting issue.
  2. [Abstract] The claim that FinMMR 'meticulously transform[s] existing financial reasoning benchmarks' and constructs novel questions from Chinese financial research reports is not accompanied by any description of the source benchmarks, transformation rules, image rendering process, or preservation of ground-truth labels after images are added. Without these details, the benchmark's validity cannot be assessed.
  3. [Abstract (Hard subset)] The headline finding that the best MLLM reaches only 53.0% accuracy on Hard problems is uninterpretable without (a) the list of evaluated models and their sizes, (b) the definition of Hard, (c) the metric and decoding settings, (d) error bars or significance tests, and (e) evidence that the Hard split was not selected post hoc from model performance. None of these are provided.
  4. [Abstract (taxonomy and annotation)] The 14 categories and 14 financial subdomains are stated as counts but not enumerated or defined. Coverage statistics, inter-annotator agreement, and quality-filtering rates for the newly constructed Chinese-report questions are also absent. These are necessary components of a benchmark paper and cannot be inferred from the abstract.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Metadata / full text] The full text header identifies the paper as arXiv:2508.04620v2, which differs from the submitted arXiv:2508.04625 identifier. If the correct FinMMR manuscript exists, the wrong PDF has been uploaded; this must be corrected before any further review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified; supplied full text is an unrelated physics paper, so no FinMMR derivation chain is available to analyze.

full rationale

The submitted manuscript consists of an abstract for a computer-vision/finance benchmark (FinMMR) and a full text that is a completely different condensed-matter physics paper about valley Chern numbers in graphene-hBN moiré superlattices. There is no overlap in content, equations, or claims between the abstract and the full text. Consequently, the paper's claimed derivation chain—namely, the construction of FinMMR, the preservation of ground-truth labels when transforming existing benchmarks, the annotation of new Chinese report questions, the 14-category taxonomy, and the 53.0% Hard accuracy figure—is entirely unsupported by any accessible methodology or supplementary material. However, circularity analysis requires exhibiting a specific reduction where a prediction or derived result is equivalent to an input by construction. The abstract alone provides no such reduction: it does not state that the Hard subset was selected based on model performance, does not describe any fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and does not invoke any self-citation that is load-bearing. The mismatch between abstract and full text is a serious verifiability and integrity concern, but it is not itself evidence of circular reasoning. Per the hard rules, speculation about post-hoc difficulty splits or label leakage is not permitted without textual evidence. Therefore, the honest finding is no significant circularity (score 0), while noting that the benchmark's validity cannot be checked from the provided material.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Since only the abstract is usable, the ledger contains only the implicit assumptions about benchmark construction and evaluation validity. No free parameters or invented entities are stated, but the full paper could contain fitted splits or annotations.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Existing financial reasoning benchmarks contain correct ground truth that can be preserved when transformed into multimodal questions.
    The abstract says the authors 'transform existing financial reasoning benchmarks' without describing revalidation; this assumes the original labels are trustworthy.
  • domain assumption Chinese financial research reports are a valid and unbiased source of reasoning questions with objectively answerable ground truth.
    New questions are constructed from such reports, but the abstract gives no details on annotation or answer verification.
  • domain assumption Accuracy on the benchmark is a meaningful proxy for financial numerical reasoning capability of MLLMs.
    The evaluative claim ('best-performing MLLM achieves 53.0%') assumes the question format and grading scheme are reliable measures.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and Challenging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FJQEZZ7P

@misc{pith2026250804625,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FinMMR: Make Financial Numerical Reasoning More Multimodal, Comprehensive, and Challenging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FJQEZZ7P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.04625}
}
read the original abstract

We present FinMMR, a novel bilingual multimodal benchmark tailored to evaluate the reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) in financial numerical reasoning tasks. Compared to existing benchmarks, our work introduces three significant advancements. (1) Multimodality: We meticulously transform existing financial reasoning benchmarks, and construct novel questions from the latest Chinese financial research reports. FinMMR comprises 4.3K questions and 8.7K images spanning 14 categories, including tables, bar charts, and ownership structure charts. (2) Comprehensiveness: FinMMR encompasses 14 financial subdomains, including corporate finance, banking, and industry analysis, significantly exceeding existing benchmarks in financial domain knowledge breadth. (3) Challenge: Models are required to perform multi-step precise numerical reasoning by integrating financial knowledge with the understanding of complex financial images and text. The best-performing MLLM achieves only 53.0% accuracy on Hard problems. We believe that FinMMR will drive advancements in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of MLLMs in real-world scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

56 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hentschel, R

    M. Hentschel, R. Kienberger, Ch. Spielmann, G. A. Rei- der, N. Milosevic, T. Brabec, P. Corkum, U. Heinzmann, M. Drescher, and F. Krausz. Attosecond metrology. Na- ture, 414(6863):509–513, November 2001

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    S. X. Hu and L. A. Collins. Attosecond pump probe: Ex- ploring ultrafast electron motion inside an atom.Physical Review Letters, 96(7):073004, February 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [3]

    Understanding the nature of ultrafast polar- ization dynamics of ferroelectric memory in the multifer- roic bifeo3

    Dhanvir Singh Rana, Iwao Kawayama, Krushna Mavani, Kouhei Takahashi, Hironaru Murakami, and Masayoshi Tonouchi. Understanding the nature of ultrafast polar- ization dynamics of ferroelectric memory in the multifer- roic bifeo3. Advanced Materials, 21(28):2881–2885, July 2009

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    Y. M. Sheu, S. A. Trugman, L. Yan, Q. X. Jia, A. J. Taylor, and R. P. Prasankumar. Using ultrashort optical pulses to couple ferroelectric and ferromagnetic order in an oxide heterostructure. Nature Communications, 5(1), December 2014

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Probing ultrafast dynamics of ferroelectrics by time-resolved pump-probe spectroscopy

    Yuan Zhang, Junfeng Dai, Xiangli Zhong, Dongwen Zhang, Gaokuo Zhong, and Jiangyu Li. Probing ultrafast dynamics of ferroelectrics by time-resolved pump-probe spectroscopy. Advanced Science, 8(22), October 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    F. Chen, Y. Zhu, S. Liu, Y. Qi, H. Y. Hwang, N. C. Brandt, J. Lu, F. Quirin, H. Enquist, P. Zalden, T. Hu, J. Goodfellow, M.-J. Sher, M. C. Hoffmann, D. Zhu, H. Lemke, J. Glownia, M. Chollet, A. R. Damodaran, J. Park, Z. Cai, I. W. Jung, M. J. Highland, D. A. Walko, J. W. Freeland, P. G. Evans, A. Vailionis, J. Lars- son, K. A. Nelson, A. M. Rappe, K. Sok...

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Triplet–triplet exciton dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes

    Dominik Stich, Florian Sp¨ ath, Hannes Kraus, An- dreas Sperlich, Vladimir Dyakonov, and Tobias Hertel. Triplet–triplet exciton dynamics in single-walled carbon nanotubes. Nature Photonics , 8(2):139–144, December 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Yusong Bai, Jean-Hubert Olivier, George Bullard, Chaoren Liu, and Michael J. Therien. Dynamics of charged excitons in electronically and morphologically homogeneous single-walled carbon nanotubes. Proceed- ings of the National Academy of Sciences , 115(4):674– 679, January 2018

    work page 2018

Show all 56 references
  1. [9]

    Probing the ultrafast dynamics of excitons in single semi- conducting carbon nanotubes

    Konrad Birkmeier, Tobias Hertel, and Achim Hartschuh. Probing the ultrafast dynamics of excitons in single semi- conducting carbon nanotubes. Nature Communications, 13(1), October 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Jager, Christian Ott, Peter M

    Marieke F. Jager, Christian Ott, Peter M. Kraus, Christopher J. Kaplan, Winston Pouse, Robert E. Mar- vel, Richard F. Haglund, Daniel M. Neumark, and Stephen R. Leone. Tracking the insulator-to-metal phase transition in vo 2 with few-femtosecond extreme uv tran- sient absorpti...

    2017

  3. [11]

    Bionta, Elissa Haddad, Adrien Leblanc, Vin- cent Gruson, Philippe Lassonde, Heide Ibrahim, J´ er´ emie Chaillou, Nicolas ´Emond, Martin R

    Mina R. Bionta, Elissa Haddad, Adrien Leblanc, Vin- cent Gruson, Philippe Lassonde, Heide Ibrahim, J´ er´ emie Chaillou, Nicolas ´Emond, Martin R. Otto, ´Alvaro Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, Rui E. F. Silva, Misha Ivanov, Bradley J. Siwick, Mohamed Chaker, and Fran¸ cois L´ egar´ e. Trac...

    2021

  4. [12]

    Controlling high-frequency spin-wave dynamics using double-pulse laser excitation

    Marwan Deb, Elena Popova, Henri-Yves Jaffr` es, Niels Keller, and Matias Bargheer. Controlling high-frequency spin-wave dynamics using double-pulse laser excitation. Physical Review Applied, 18(4):044001, October 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    C. E. Graves, A. H. Reid, T. Wang, B. Wu, S. de Jong, K. Vahaplar, I. Radu, D. P. Bernstein, M. Messer- schmidt, L. M¨ uller, R. Coffee, M. Bionta, S. W. Epp, R. Hartmann, N. Kimmel, G. Hauser, A. Hartmann, P. Holl, H. Gorke, J. H. Mentink, A. Tsukamoto, A. Fognini, J. J. Turn...

    2013

  6. [14]

    C. D. Stanciu, F. Hansteen, A. V. Kimel, A. Kirilyuk, A. Tsukamoto, A. Itoh, and Th. Rasing. All-optical mag- netic recording with circularly polarized light. Physical Review Letters, 99(4):047601, July 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Schoen- lein, and Andrea Cavalleri

    Matteo Rini, Ra’anan Tobey, Nicky Dean, Jiro Itatani, Yasuhide Tomioka, Yoshinori Tokura, Robert W. Schoen- lein, and Andrea Cavalleri. Control of the electronic phase of a manganite by mode-selective vibrational exci- tation. Nature, 449(7158):72–74, September 2007

    2007

  8. [16]

    Weidinger and Michael Knap

    Simon A. Weidinger and Michael Knap. Floquet prether- malization and regimes of heating in a periodically driven, interacting quantum system. Scientific Reports, 7(1), April 2017

    2017

  9. [17]

    Floquet analysis of excitations in materials

    Umberto De Giovannini and Hannes H¨ ubener. Floquet analysis of excitations in materials. Journal of Physics: Materials, 3(1):012001, October 2019

    2019

  10. [18]

    Floquet engineering of quantum materials

    Takashi Oka and Sota Kitamura. Floquet engineering of quantum materials. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 10(1):387–408, March 2019

    2019

  11. [19]

    Sentef, M

    M.A. Sentef, M. Claassen, A.F. Kemper, B. Moritz, T. Oka, J.K. Freericks, and T.P. Devereaux. Theory of floquet band formation and local pseudospin textures in pump-probe photoemission of graphene. Nature Commu- nications, 6(1), May 2015. 9

    2015

  12. [20]

    S. Ito, M. Sch¨ uler, M. Meierhofer, S. Schlauderer, J. Freudenstein, J. Reimann, D. Afanasiev, K. A. Kokh, O. E. Tereshchenko, J. G¨ udde, M. A. Sentef, U. H¨ ofer, and R. Huber. Build-up and dephasing of floquet–bloch bands on subcycle timescales. Nature, 616(7958):696– 701,...

    2023

  13. [21]

    Sentef, Jiajun Li, Fabian K¨ unzel, and Martin Eckstein

    Michael A. Sentef, Jiajun Li, Fabian K¨ unzel, and Martin Eckstein. Quantum to classical crossover of floquet engi- neering in correlated quantum systems. Physical Review Research, 2(3):033033, July 2020

    2020

  14. [22]

    Kennes, Martin Claassen, Michael A

    Dante M. Kennes, Martin Claassen, Michael A. Sentef, and Christoph Karrasch. Light-induced d -wave super- conductivity through floquet-engineered fermi surfaces in cuprates. Physical Review B , 100(7):075115, August 2019

    2019

  15. [23]

    Eckhardt, Giacomo Passetti, Moustafa Oth- man, Christoph Karrasch, Fabio Cavaliere, Michael A

    Christian J. Eckhardt, Giacomo Passetti, Moustafa Oth- man, Christoph Karrasch, Fabio Cavaliere, Michael A. Sentef, and Dante M. Kennes. Quantum floquet engi- neering with an exactly solvable tight-binding chain in a cavity. Communications Physics, 5(1), May 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Topp, Christian J

    Gabriel E. Topp, Christian J. Eckhardt, Dante M. Kennes, Michael A. Sentef, and P¨ aivi T¨ orm¨ a. Light- matter coupling and quantum geometry in moir´ e mate- rials. Physical Review B , 104(6):064306, August 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Light- induced topological magnons in two-dimensional van der waals magnets

    Emil Vinas Bostr¨ om, Martin Claassen, James McIver, Gregor Jotzu, Angel Rubio, and Michael Sentef. Light- induced topological magnons in two-dimensional van der waals magnets. SciPost Physics , 9(4), October 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    O. V. Kibis, I. V. Iorsh, and I. A. Shelykh. Floquet engi- neering of 2d materials. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1461(1):012064, March 2020

    2020

  19. [27]

    Floquet band engineer- ing and topological phase transitions in 1t’ transition metal dichalcogenides

    Xiangru Kong, Wei Luo, Linyang Li, Mina Yoon, Tom Berlijn, and Liangbo Liang. Floquet band engineer- ing and topological phase transitions in 1t’ transition metal dichalcogenides. 2D Materials , 9(2):025005, Jan- uary 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Rudner and Netanel H

    Mark S. Rudner and Netanel H. Lindner. Band struc- ture engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in floquet topological insulators. Nature Reviews Physics, 2(5):229– 244, May 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    Sato, Hannes H¨ ubener, and Angel Rubio

    Alberto Castro, Umberto De Giovannini, Shunsuke A. Sato, Hannes H¨ ubener, and Angel Rubio. Floquet en- gineering the band structure of materials with optimal control theory. Physical Review Research , 4(3):033213, September 2022

    2022

  22. [30]

    Floquet topological insulators for sound

    Romain Fleury, Alexander B Khanikaev, and Andrea Al` u. Floquet topological insulators for sound. Nature Communications, 7(1), June 2016

    2016

  23. [31]

    Floquet engineering of nonequilibrium valley-polarized quantum anomalous hall effect with tunable chern number

    Fangyang Zhan, Junjie Zeng, Zhuo Chen, Xin Jin, Jing Fan, Tingyong Chen, and Rui Wang. Floquet engineering of nonequilibrium valley-polarized quantum anomalous hall effect with tunable chern number. Nano Letters , 23(6):2166–2172, March 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Phonon- driven spin-floquet magneto-valleytronics in mos2

    Dongbin Shin, Hannes H¨ ubener, Umberto De Giovannini, Hosub Jin, Angel Rubio, and Noejung Park. Phonon- driven spin-floquet magneto-valleytronics in mos2. Na- ture Communications, 9(1), February 2018

    2018

  25. [33]

    Floquet en- gineering of anomalous hall effects in monolayer mos2

    Haijun Cao, Jia-Tao Sun, and Sheng Meng. Floquet en- gineering of anomalous hall effects in monolayer mos2. npj Quantum Materials , 9(1), November 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    Grushin, ´Alvaro G´ omez-Le´ on, and Titus Neu- pert

    Adolfo G. Grushin, ´Alvaro G´ omez-Le´ on, and Titus Neu- pert. Floquet fractional chern insulators. Physical Review Letters, 112(15):156801, April 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Quan- tum electrodynamic control of matter: Cavity-enhanced ferroelectric phase transition

    Yuto Ashida, Ata¸ c ˙Imamo˘ glu, J´ erˆ ome Faist, Dieter Jaksch, Andrea Cavalleri, and Eugene Demler. Quan- tum electrodynamic control of matter: Cavity-enhanced ferroelectric phase transition. Physical Review X , 10(4):041027, November 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Yantao Li, H. A. Fertig, and Babak Seradjeh. Floquet- engineered topological flat bands in irradiated twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review Research, 2(4):043275, November 2020

    2020

  29. [37]

    Topp, Gregor Jotzu, James W

    Gabriel E. Topp, Gregor Jotzu, James W. McIver, Lede Xian, Angel Rubio, and Michael A. Sentef. Topological floquet engineering of twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review Research, 1(2):023031, September 2019

    2019

  30. [38]

    Michael Vogl, Martin Rodriguez-Vega, and Gregory A. Fiete. Effective floquet hamiltonians for periodically driven twisted bilayer graphene. Physical Review B , 101(23), June 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    MacDonald, and Gregory A

    Michael Vogl, Martin Rodriguez-Vega, Benedetta Flebus, Allan H. MacDonald, and Gregory A. Fiete. Floquet en- gineering of topological transitions in a twisted transi- tion metal dichalcogenide homobilayer. Physical Review B, 103(1):014310, January 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Mitrano, A

    M. Mitrano, A. Cantaluppi, D. Nicoletti, S. Kaiser, A. Perucchi, S. Lupi, P. Di Pietro, D. Pontiroli, M. Ricc` o, S. R. Clark, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri. Possible light- induced superconductivity in k3c60 at high temperature. Nature, 530(7591):461–464, February 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Fausti, R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri. Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe- ordered cuprate. Science, 331(6014):189–191, January 2011

    2011

  34. [42]

    Yamamoto

    Masayuki Suda, Reizo Kato, and Hiroshi M. Yamamoto. Light-induced superconductivity using a photoactive electric double layer. Science, 347(6223):743–746, Febru- ary 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    S. Fava, G. De Vecchi, G. Jotzu, M. Buzzi, T. Gebert, Y. Liu, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri. Magnetic field expulsion in optically driven yba2cu3o6.48. Nature, 632(8023):75–80, July 2024

    2024

  36. [44]

    T. F. Nova, A. S. Disa, M. Fechner, and A. Cavalleri. Metastable ferroelectricity in optically strained srtio 3. Science, 364(6445):1075–1079, June 2019

    2019

  37. [45]

    Rappe, and Keith A

    Xian Li, Tian Qiu, Jiahao Zhang, Edoardo Baldini, Jian Lu, Andrew M. Rappe, and Keith A. Nelson. Terahertz field–induced ferroelectricity in quantum paraelectric sr- tio 3. Science, 364(6445):1079–1082, June 2019

    2019

  38. [46]

    T. F. Nova, A. Cartella, A. Cantaluppi, M. F¨ orst, D. Bossini, R. V. Mikhaylovskiy, A. V. Kimel, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri. An effective magnetic field from op- tically driven phonons. Nature Physics , 13(2):132–136, October 2016

    2016

  39. [47]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri. Light-induced anomalous hall effect in graphene. Nature Physics , 16(1):38–41, November 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    Miftah Hadi Syahputra Anfa, Sabri Elatresh, Hocine Bahlouli, and Michael Vogl. Effective k-valley hamil- tonian for transition metal dichalcogenide bilayers un- der pressure and application to twisted bilayers with pressure-induced topological phase transitions. Phys. Rev. B, ...

    2025

  41. [49]

    Electronic proper- ties of graphene/hexagonal-boron-nitride moir´ e superlat- 10 tice

    Pilkyung Moon and Mikito Koshino. Electronic proper- ties of graphene/hexagonal-boron-nitride moir´ e superlat- 10 tice. Physical Review B , 90(15), October 2014

    2014

  42. [50]

    Electronic Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer Graphene , pages 173–211

    Mikito Koshino and Tsuneya Ando. Electronic Properties of Monolayer and Multilayer Graphene , pages 173–211. Springer International Publishing, December 2013

    2013

  43. [51]

    Lei Liu, Y. P. Feng, and Z. X. Shen. Structural and electronic properties of h-bn. Physical Review B , 68(10):104102, September 2003

    2003

  44. [52]

    S lawi´ nska, I

    J. S lawi´ nska, I. Zasada, and Z. Klusek. Energy gap tuning in graphene on hexagonal boron nitride bilayer system. Physical Review B , 81(15):155433, April 2010

    2010

  45. [53]

    ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern

    Felix Bloch. ¨Uber die quantenmechanik der elektronen in kristallgittern. Zeitschrift f¨ ur physik, 52(7-8):555–600, 1929

    1929

  46. [54]

    Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems

    Mark S Rudner, Netanel H Lindner, Erez Berg, and Michael Levin. Anomalous edge states and the bulk-edge correspondence for periodically driven two-dimensional systems. Physical Review X , 3(3):031005, 2013

    2013

  47. [55]

    Chern num- ber and berry curvature for gaussian mixed states of fermions

    Lukas Wawer and Michael Fleischhauer. Chern num- ber and berry curvature for gaussian mixed states of fermions. Physical Review B , 104(9), September 2021

    2021

  48. [56]

    Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances

    Takahiro Fukui, Yasuhiro Hatsugai, and Hiroshi Suzuki. Chern numbers in discretized brillouin zone: Efficient method of computing (spin) hall conductances. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan , 74(6):1674–1677, June 2005

    2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.