Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 44 references

Strongly correlated electronic superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric Re-Os-based high/medium-entropy alloys

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Five new rhenium–osmium alloys superconduct in the noncentrosymmetric α-Mn structure at 4.20–5.11 K, with transition temperature rising with electron count and large Kadowaki–Woods ratios read as strong electronic correlations.

desk verdict The five new Re-Os-based α-Mn HEA superconductors look real, but the 'strong correlations' headline does not survive contact with the data as written. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05010 v1 pith:YF5XWCRH submitted 2025-08-07 cond-mat.supr-con

Rui Chen , Longfu Li , Lingyong Zeng , Kuan Li , Peifeng Yu , Kangwang Wang , Zaichen Xiang , Shuangyue Wang
show 5 more authors
Jingjun Qin Wanyi Zhang Yucheng Li Tian Shang Huixia Luo
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con PACS 74.70.Ad
keywords high/medium-entropyalloyssuperconductivitynoncentrosymmetricstructureα-MnstrongelectroniccorrelationsvalenceelectroncountKadowaki–Woodsratiotype-IIsuperconductor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports five previously unreported rhenium–osmium-based high/medium-entropy alloys — Re3.5Os3.5Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3Os3Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3.5Os3.5Mo0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3Os3Mo0.5Hf0.5Nb3, and Re3.5Os3.5Mo0.5W0.5Nb3 — and claims they are bulk type-II superconductors with $T_c$ from 4.20 K to 5.11 K, crystallizing single-phase in the noncentrosymmetric α-Mn structure. Three further claims give the work its point: the transition temperature rises with valence electron count (6.45–6.81), a Matthias-rule trend that suggests a design lever for further alloys; the structure and superconductivity survive a month of immersion in 0.5 mol/L HCl; and the large Kadowaki–Woods ratios imply strong electronic correlations. If the claims hold, these alloys enlarge the small family of noncentrosymmetric high-entropy-alloy superconductors and give experimentalists a composition-tunable platform for studying how inversion-symmetry breaking, spin–orbit coupling, and chemical disorder shape the superconducting state.

What carries the argument

Three elements carry the argument. The noncentrosymmetric α-Mn structure (space group $I\bar{4}3m$) lacks an inversion center, which permits antisymmetric spin–orbit coupling and is why this family interests researchers hunting unconventional pairing. Valence electron count (VEC) is the design axis: compositions were chosen so VEC spans 6.45–6.81, and $T_c$ tracks it monotonically, following the Matthias-rule dome for transition-metal alloys. The Kadowaki–Woods ratio $A/\gamma^2$, formed from the $T^2$ resistivity coefficient ($\rho = \rho_0 + AT^2$) and the specific-heat Sommerfeld coefficient $\gamma$, is the diagnostic used to claim strong electron–electron correlations.

What would settle it

In the correlations discussion around Figure 7b, recompute $A/\gamma^2$ from the tabulated $A$ and $\gamma$ using the benchmark convention ($a_{\mathrm{TM}} = 0.4$ μΩ cm mol² K² J⁻², with $\gamma$ in J mol⁻¹ K⁻²). The printed ratios (≈$10^{-4}$) are reproduced only if $\gamma$ is left in mJ mol⁻¹ K⁻²; the unit-consistent values come out near $10^2$, orders of magnitude above the heavy-fermion benchmark of 10. Whichever arithmetic is right, one of the two numbers is wrong, and the 'strongly correlated' claim stands or falls with it. A complementary check: measure $A$ in a more ordered compositi

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Five previously unreported Re–Os-based alloys crystallize single-phase in the noncentrosymmetric α-Mn structure (space group $I\bar{4}3m$) and are bulk type-II superconductors with $T_c$ = 4.20–5.11 K. Transport, magnetization, and specific-heat measurements agree: near-100% diamagnetic shielding, specific-heat jumps $\Delta C/\gamma T_c \approx$ 1.38–1.48 close to the BCS value, moderate electron–phonon coupling ($\lambda_{ep} \approx$ 0.6), and upper critical fields up to 7.71 T, with Re3Os3Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3 approaching the Pauli paramagnetic limit. The paper reports $T_c$ increasing with valence electron count, survival of structure and superconductivity after one month in HCl, and large Kado

Load-bearing premise

The strong-correlation conclusion rests entirely on the Kadowaki–Woods ratio $A/\gamma^2$ being a faithful measure of electron–electron interactions in these alloys — even though $A$ is fitted over 10–50 K in samples with residual resistivity near 800 μΩ·cm and residual-resistance ratios near 1, where impurity and phonon scattering can mimic a large $A/\gamma^2$, and even though the printed ratios do not match the quoted transition-metal benchmark.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Valence electron count becomes a tuning knob: across the five alloys, $T_c$ moves from 4.20 K to 5.11 K as VEC rises, so compositions on the rising side of the Matthias dome are the natural next targets.
  • The superconductivity is corrosion-resistant: after one month in 0.5 mol/L HCl the crystal structure, composition, and $T_c$ are essentially unchanged, a practical advantage for superconducting components in acidic environments.
  • The alloys carry a strong-correlation signature: their large Kadowaki–Woods ratios place them, on the paper's reading, among strongly correlated metals rather than ordinary transition-metal alloys.
  • The pairing is nonetheless conventional: $\Delta C/\gamma T_c \approx$ 1.38–1.48 is BCS-like and no alloy exceeds the Pauli paramagnetic limit, with Re3Os3Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3 approaching it most closely ($\mu_0 H_{c2} \approx$ 7.71 T vs $\mu_0 H_P \approx$ 7.81 T).

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The strong-correlation claim should be re-derived before it is quoted: the printed Kadowaki–Woods values (≈$10^{-4}$ μΩ cm mol² K² J⁻²) sit three to four orders of magnitude below the paper's own transition-metal benchmark (0.4), so as printed they contradict 'larger than transition metals'; computing $A/\gamma^2$ with $\gamma$ in J mol⁻¹ K⁻² rather than mJ changes the result by roughly a factor o
  • If the VEC–$T_c$ trend is real, a denser composition scan on the steep part of the Matthias dome (VEC ≈ 6.7–7.0) is the direct test; the present five points are consistent with the trend but do not resolve its shape.
  • Because other Re-based α-Mn-type superconductors (e.g., Re6Zr, Re8NbTa) break time-reversal symmetry, a muon-spin-rotation or polar-Kerr measurement on these alloys would test whether the noncentrosymmetric lattice here also produces an unconventional pairing channel — an experiment the authors explicitly leave open.
  • The one-month HCl stability is the most unusual functional result; whether it comes from noble-metal passivation of the Re/Os surface or from bulk corrosion resistance is untested, and a weight-loss or surface-spectroscopy study over longer exposures would separate the mechanisms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports five previously unreported Re-Os-based alloys with nominal compositions Re3.5Os3.5Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3Os3Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3.5Os3.5Mo0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3Os3Mo0.5Hf0.5Nb3, and Re3.5Os3.5Mo0.5W0.5Nb3. The authors characterize the structure by powder XRD/Rietveld refinement, claiming a single noncentrosymmetric α-Mn (I-43m) phase, and probe superconductivity by electrical resistivity, magnetization, and specific heat. They report bulk type-II superconductivity with Tc values between 4.20 K and 5.11 K, near-100% diamagnetic shielding, specific-heat jumps close to the BCS weak-coupling value, upper critical fields below the Pauli limit, and negligible degradation after one month in HCl. They also report a VEC-dependent Tc trend and large Kadowaki-Woods ratios, which they interpret as evidence for strong electronic correlations. The central claim, as stated in the title and abstract, is that these are strongly correlated noncentrosymmetric high/medium-entropy alloy superconductors.

Significance. If the superconductivity characterization is correct, the work adds five new members to the small family of noncentrosymmetric α-Mn-type HEA superconductors and provides useful data on composition-dependent Tc and chemical stability. The multi-probe evidence (resistivity, magnetization, specific heat) for bulk superconductivity appears plausible and is a strength of the paper. However, the headline claim of strong electronic correlations is not currently supported. The printed KWR values are numerically inconsistent with the quoted benchmarks because of a units error; the resistivity coefficient A is extracted from samples with RRR≈1 and nearly temperature-independent resistivity, where a T2 term is not obviously intrinsic; and the paper's own effective-mass and Uemura-ratio analysis points to light quasiparticles, opposite to a strong-correlation interpretation. The superconductivity finding itself does not depend on the strong-correlation claim and could stand after revision, but the central claim as written overreaches the evidence.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4, KWR paragraph and Figure 7b] The printed KWR values (1.52×10^-4, 1.67×10^-4, etc. μΩ cm mol² K² J^-2) are numerically equal to A/γ² when γ is expressed in mJ mol^-1 K^-2, not J^-2. Converting to J^-2 requires multiplying by 10^6. As written, the values are ~10^6 times smaller than the quoted transition-metal benchmark a_TM=0.4 μΩ cm mol² K² J^-2 and therefore contradict the claim of 'large KWR'. With the corrected conversion the values become ~10², which would be larger than a_TM, but this only highlights the need to re-evaluate whether A/γ² is a meaningful measure in these highly resistive, RRR≈1 alloys. The conclusion 'anomalously large KWR ... implying strong electronic correlations' is load-bearing and cannot be assessed until this units inconsistency is fixed and the comparison is redone with proper error treatment.
  2. [Section 3.2, resistivity fitting] The coefficient A is obtained by fitting ρ(T) from 10 K to 50 K with a fixed power law n=2. The samples have RRR 1.01–1.05 and residual resistivity 400–824 μΩ cm, so the normal-state resistivity is almost temperature-independent and the T² term is a tiny residual deviation. Under these conditions, A can be dominated by a small baseline offset, phonon-assisted scattering, or the imposed n=2 constraint. The extracted A values vary by nearly an order of magnitude (2.35×10^-4 to 1.97×10^-3 μΩ cm K^-2) while γ varies only weakly, so the resulting KWR pattern may reflect fitting artifacts rather than electronic correlations. The paper should provide fit residuals, justify the n=2 range, and rule out phonon contributions before using A to support a strong-correlation claim. The authors themselves note that the large KWR 'may originate from impurity scattering', which further undermines the inte
  3. [Section 3.4, effective mass and Uemura plot (Fig. 7d)] The paper derives m* ≈ 0.31–0.34 m_e and Tc/TF ≈ 1.1×10^-4 for two of the alloys, which is the opposite of a heavy-fermion/strong-correlation signature. A KWR above the heavy-fermion benchmark (10 μΩ cm mol² K² J^-2) and an effective mass below the free-electron mass cannot both describe the same quasiparticle system without a serious error in one of the analyses. In addition, the carrier density n used in the m* equation is stated but not derived in the text; it should be defined explicitly. Until this internal inconsistency is resolved, the claim of strong electronic correlations is not secure. This is a load-bearing inconsistency because the paper's central message depends on the KWR interpretation.
  4. [Section 3.4, Tc vs λep (Figure 7c)] The λep values are computed from Tc using the inverted McMillan formula with a fixed μ* = 0.13, so the near-linear relation between Tc and λep is largely built into the defining formula rather than being an independent empirical finding. The statement 'the Tc of all HEAs is almost linearly related to λep' should be presented as a consequence of the model, not as a separate discovery. This is a presentation issue rather than fatal, but it should be corrected.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Display equation for McMillan formula] The formula for λep is garbled in the text; the parenthesized terms are missing. Please typeset it correctly.
  2. [Figure 5 caption] The caption lists Re3Os3Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3 twice and omits one of the five compositions. Check and correct.
  3. [Table 2, ρ0 row] The row labeled ρ0 (μΩ cm) contains values like -3.43×10^-5 and 1.67×10^-4, which cannot be residual resistivities in μΩ cm. These appear to be KWR values misplaced in the table. Verify all entries.
  4. [General notation] The term 'MEAs-HEAs' is used inconsistently; define clearly which compositions are medium-entropy and which are high-entropy, and use a consistent abbreviation.
  5. [Reference formatting] Reference [32] and [37] are the same paper; consolidate or cross-reference.
  6. [Section 3.4, KWR paragraph] The phrase 'Under the premise of given ρ0, A, γ' seems to contain a typo; ρ0 is not needed for KWR and appears to be an editing artifact.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

One constructed Tc–lambda_ep correlation; the main superconductivity and KWR claims are empirical and not circular.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.4 (Specific Heat) and Fig. 7c discussion]
    "From ΘD, we can estimate the electron-phonon coupling strength λep using the inverted McMillan formula,... μ* ... is set to 0.13 in this paper. We obtain 0.598, 0.596, 0.605, 0.609, 0.648 ... Especially, the Tc of all HEAs is almost linearly related to λep."

    λep is not measured independently: it is obtained by inverting the McMillan formula using the same measured Tc (with measured ΘD and fixed μ*=0.13). Since ΘD varies only mildly (293–358 K), λep is essentially a monotone function of Tc. The reported 'almost linear' Tc–λep correlation is therefore a restatement of the defining formula, not an independently discovered relation. This is a minor self-definitional step; it does not affect the structure, Tc, type-II, or KWR claims.

full rationale

The paper is a largely self-contained experimental study. The five alloys are new, and the α-Mn structure, bulk type-II superconductivity, Tc values, and acid stability are supported by XRD, transport, magnetization, and specific-heat data; none of these claims reduces to an input. The Kadowaki-Woods ratio is computed from independently fitted A and γ, so the 'strong correlations' interpretation is an empirical inference rather than a circular prediction. The only circular element is the secondary statement that Tc is almost linearly related to λep, because λep was computed from Tc via the inverted McMillan formula with fixed μ*; that correlation is built into the equation. The paper's printed KWR numbers (1.52×10^-4 etc.) are inconsistent with the quoted transition-metal benchmark a_TM=0.4 μΩ cm mol² K² J^-2 and with its own claim of 'large' KWR; similarly, m*≈0.34 me is hard to reconcile with a heavy-fermion-like KWR. These are internal-consistency/correctness concerns, not circularity. Self-citations to the Luo group are present but not load-bearing. Overall circularity is minor: score 4 rather than higher because the central superconductivity claim and the VEC-Tc trend are independent empirical findings.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central experimental claims rest on standard materials characterization assumptions. The main free parameters are the fitted transport and specific heat coefficients that feed the KWR and lambda_ep calculations, plus the chosen mu* value. No new physical entities are introduced. The most fragile assumptions are the single-phase structure assignment and the validity of KWR as a correlation measure in dirty alloys.

free parameters (4)
  • mu* Coulomb pseudopotential = 0.13
    Chosen by hand in the inverted McMillan formula to compute lambda_ep; directly affects the reported lambda_ep and N(EF) values.
  • Resistivity T-squared coefficient A = 0.24e-3 to 1.97e-3 microohm cm K^-2
    Fitted from 10-50 K resistivity data and used to compute the Kadowaki-Woods ratio, the basis of the strong-correlation claim.
  • Sommerfeld coefficient gamma = 3.31 to 3.79 mJ mol^-1 K^-2
    Fitted from specific heat and used in the Kadowaki-Woods ratio and effective mass estimates.
  • Debye model phonon coefficient beta = 0.04208 to 0.07692 mJ mol^-1 K^-4
    Fitted to specific heat and used to derive Debye temperature and lambda_ep.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Rietveld refinement of powder XRD correctly assigns the alpha-Mn structure, space group I-43m, to all five alloys.
    The noncentrosymmetric structure claim depends on this. One sample has a 10.42 Å lattice parameter, far outside the typical alpha-Mn range, which is not explained.
  • domain assumption EDS-measured compositions represent the bulk composition and the samples are single phase.
    The VEC values and property trends are computed from nominal and EDS compositions; unobserved secondary phases or clustering would change the interpretation.
  • domain assumption The Kadowaki-Woods ratio is a valid measure of electron-electron correlations in these highly disordered alloys.
    The strong-correlation claim relies on KWR, but the paper itself notes impurity scattering and proximity to a quantum critical point as alternative sources of large KWR.
  • domain assumption The inverted McMillan formula with mu*=0.13 and the Debye model apply to these alloys.
    lambda_ep and N(EF) are derived under weak-to-moderate electron-phonon coupling assumptions that may not hold for disordered multicomponent alloys.
  • standard math Ginzburg-Landau and WHH theory describe the upper critical field behavior.
    Standard theoretical tools used to estimate Hc2, coherence length, and Maki parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Strongly correlated electronic superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric Re-Os-based high/medium-entropy alloys." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YF5XWCRH

@misc{pith2026250805010,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Strongly correlated electronic superconductivity in the noncentrosymmetric Re-Os-based high/medium-entropy alloys},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YF5XWCRH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05010}
}
read the original abstract

The class of unconventional superconductors, particularly noncentrosymmetric superconductors, has been highly considered as potential materials for understanding the complex properties of quantum materials. Here, five previously unreported Re3.5Os3.5Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3Os3Ta0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3.5Os3.5Mo0.5Hf0.5Nb3, Re3.5Os3.5Mo0.5W0.5Nb3, and Re3Os3Mo0.5Hf0.5Nb3 Re-Os-based high/medium-entropy alloys (MEAs-HEAs) with valence electron count ranging from 6.45 to 6.81 were synthesized and investigated using x-ray diffraction, transport, magnetization, and specific heat measurements. Our analyses confirm that all five compounds crystallize in a noncentrosymmetric {\alpha}-Mn-type structure and exhibit type-II superconductivity with Tc values from 4.20 K to 5.11 K, respectively. Unexpectedly, despite being immersed in an acidic environment for one month, the structures and superconducting properties of HEAs remain stable. Our findings indicate that the Tc increases with an increasing valence electron count in MEAs-HEAs. Furthermore, these noncentrosymmetric {\alpha}-Mn-type HEA superconductors have large Kadowaki-Woods ratios (KWR), implying the presence of strong electronic correlations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Y .F. Ye, Q. Wang, J. Lu, C.T. Liu, Y . Yang, High-entropy alloy: challenges and prospects, Mater. Today 19 (2016) 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.026

    work page doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2015.11.026 2016

  2. [2]

    Tsai, J.-W

    M.-H. Tsai, J.-W. Yeh, High-Entropy Alloys: A Critical Review, Mater. Res. Lett. 2 (2014) 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/21663831.2014.912690

    arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    L. Zeng, X. Hu, M. Boubeche, K. Li, L. Li, P. Yu, K. Wang, C. Zhang, K. Jin, D.- X. Yao, H. Luo, Extremely strong coupling s -wave superconductivity in the medium-entropy alloy TiHfNbTa, Sci. Chin a Phys. Mech. Astron. 66 (2023) 277412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-023-2113-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-023-2113-6 2023

  4. [5]

    T. Ying, T. Yu, Y .-S. Shiah, C. Li, J. Li, Y . Qi, H. Hosono, High-Entropy van der Waals Materials Formed from Mixed Metal Dichalcogenides, Halides, and Phosphorus Trisulfides, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143 (2021) 7042–7049. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c01580

    work page doi:10.1021/jacs.1c01580 2021

  5. [6]

    X. Wang, W. Guo, Y . Fu, High-entropy alloys: emerging materials for advanced functional applications, J. Mater. Ch em. A 9 (2021) 663–701. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0TA09601F

    doi:10.1039/d0ta09601f 2021

  6. [7]

    George, D

    E.P. George, D. Raabe, R.O. Ritchie, High -entropy alloys, Nat. Rev. Mater. 4 (2019) 515–534. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-019-0121-4

    doi:10.1038/s41578-019-0121-4 2019

  7. [8]

    X. Yan, Y . Zhang, Functional properties and promisin g applications of high entropy alloys, Scr. Mater. 187 (2020) 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.06.017 2020

  8. [9]

    Kitagawa, S

    J. Kitagawa, S. Hamamoto, N. Ishizu, Cutting Edge of High -Entropy Alloy Superconductors from the Perspective of Materials Research, Metals 10 (2020)

    work page 2020

Show all 44 references
  1. [10]

    Koželj, S

    P. Koželj, S. Vrtnik, A. Jelen, S. Jazbec, Z. Jagličić, S. Maiti, M. Feuerbacher, W. Steurer, J. Dolinšek, Discovery of a Superconducting High -Entropy Alloy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 107001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.107001

    2014 doi

  2. [11]

    L. Zeng, Z. Wang, J. Song, G. Lin, R. Guo, S. Luo, S. Guo, K. Li, P. Yu, C. Zhang, W. Guo, J. Ma, Y . Hou, H. Luo, Discovery of the High‐Entropy Carbide Ceramic Topological Superconductor Candidate (T i0.2Zr0.2Nb0.2Hf0.2Ta0.2)C, Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (2023) 2301929. https://do...

    2023 doi

  3. [12]

    V on Rohr, M.J

    F. V on Rohr, M.J. Winiarski, J. Tao, T. Klimczuk, R.J. Cava, Effect of electron count and chemical complexity in the Ta -Nb-Hf-Zr-Ti high -entropy alloy superconductor, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1615926113

    2016 doi

  4. [13]

    J.H. Kim, R. Hidayati, S.-G. Jung, Y .A. Salawu, H.-J. Kim, J.H. Yun, J.-S. Rhyee, Enhancement of critical current density and strong vortex pinning in high entropy alloy superconductor Ta 1/6Nb2/6Hf1/6Zr1/6Ti1/6 synthesized by spark plasma sintering, Acta Mater. 232 (2022) 11...

    2022

  5. [14]

    Q. Zhu, G. Xiao, Y . Cui, W. Yang, S. Wu, G. -H. Cao, Z. Ren, Structural transformation of MoReRu medium-entropy alloy by carbon addition, Scr. Mater. 210 (2022) 114464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2021.114464

    2022

  6. [15]

    Q. Zhu, G. Xiao, Y . Cui, W. Yang, S. Wu, G.-H. Cao, Z. Ren, Superconducting interstitial MoReRuC medium-entropy alloys with a hexagonal structure, J. Alloys Compd. 892 (2022) 162131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.162131

    2022

  7. [16]

    Strong, R.J

    D. Strong, R.J. Cava, Superconductivity in the face-centered cubic W-M-Rh-Ir-Pt M = {Mo, Nb, Ta, Re} high-entropy alloy, J. Mater. Sci. 59 (2024) 10347–10356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-024-09780-5

    2024 doi

  8. [17]

    L. Zeng, X. Hu, Y . Zhou, Y . Liu, M. Boswell, W. Xie, K. Li, L. Li, P. Yu, C. Zhang, W.-M. Guo, D.-X. Yao, H. Luo, Superconductivity and non-trivial band topology in high-entropy carbonitride Ti0.2Nb0.2Ta0.2Mo0.2W0.2C1-xNx, Innov. Mater. 1 (2023) 100042. https://doi.org/10.59...

    2023

  9. [18]

    Kushwaha, R.P

    R.K. Kushwaha, R.P. Singh, Broken time -reversal symmetry in a new non - centrosymmetric superconductor Re8NbTa, arxiv-2401.07614

    arXiv

  10. [19]

    Krishnan, J.J

    M. Krishnan, J.J. Meng, B.-Z. Li, Y . Ma, C. Wang, D. Bhoi, Y . Uwatoko, Q. Jing, B. Liu, Superconducting ground state and electronic properties of σ-Phase Ta–W– Mo-Re-Os high entropy alloys, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 202 (2025) 112630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2025.112630

    2025

  11. [20]

    Koyama, Y

    T. Koyama, Y . Maeda, T. Yamazaki, K. Ueda, T. Mito, T. Kohara, T. Waki, Y . Tabata, H. Tsunemi, M. Ito, H. Nakamura, Normal and Superconducting Properties of the Noncentrosymmetric Mo 3Al2C, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 82 (2013) 073709. https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.82.073709

    2013 doi

  12. [21]

    Karki, Y .M

    A.B. Karki, Y .M. Xiong, I. Vekhter, D. Browne, P.W. Adams, D.P. Young, K.R. Thomas, J.Y . Chan, H. Kim, R. Prozorov, Structure and physical properties of the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Mo3Al2C, Phys. Rev. B (2010)

    2010

  13. [22]

    Kawashima, A

    K. Kawashima, A. Kawano, T. Muranaka, J. Akimitsu, Superconductivity in M 7 Re13X ( M = W, Mo, X = B, C ) compounds, Phys. B Conde ns. Matter 378–380 (2006) 1118–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2006.01.489

    2006 doi

  14. [23]

    Ying, Y .P

    T.P. Ying, Y .P. Qi, H. Hosono, Superconductivity with strong electron -phonon coupling in noncentrosymmetric W 3Al2C, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019) 094522. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.094522

    2019 doi

  15. [24]

    G. Xiao, Q. Zhu, W. Yang, Y . Cui, S. Song, G.-H. Cao, Z. Ren, Centrosymmetric to noncentrosymmetric structural transformation in a superconducting high - entropy alloy due to carbon addition, Sci. China Mater. 66 (2023) 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40843-022-2144-x

    2023 doi

  16. [25]

    Bauer, G

    E. Bauer, G. Hilscher, H. Michor, Ch. Paul, E.W. Scheidt, A. Gribanov, Yu. Seropegin, H. Noël, M. Sigrist, P. Rogl, Heavy Fermion Superconductivity and Magnetic Order in Noncentrosymmetric CePt 3Si, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 (2004) 027003. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.027003

    2004 doi

  17. [26]

    Singh, A.D

    R.P. Singh, A.D. Hillier, B. Mazidian, J. Quintanilla, J.F. Annett, D.McK. Paul, G. Balakrishnan, M.R. Lees, Detection of Time-Reversal Symmetry Breaking in the Noncentrosymmetric Superconductor Re 6Zr Using Muon -Spin Spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014) 107002. https://...

    2014 doi

  18. [27]

    Kuroiwa, Y

    S. Kuroiwa, Y . Saura, J. Akimitsu, M. Hiraishi, M. Miyazaki, K.H. Satoh, S. Takeshita, R. Kadono, Multigap Supercon ductivity in Sesquicarbides La 2C3 and Y2C3, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 097002. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.097002

    2008 doi

  19. [28]

    J. Chen, L. Jiao, J.L. Zhang, Y . Chen, L. Yang, M. Nicklas, F. Steglich, H.Q. Yuan, Evidence for two -gap superconductivity in the non -centrosymmetric compound LaNiC2, New J. Phys. 15 (2013) 053005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367 - 2630/15/5/053005

    2013 doi

  20. [29]

    Shang, M

    T. Shang, M. Smidman, S.K. Ghosh, C. Baines, L.J. Chang, D.J. Gawryluk, J.A.T. Barker, R.P. Singh, D.McK. Paul, G. Balakrishnan, E. Pomjakushina, M. Shi, M. Medarde, A.D. Hillier, H.Q. Yuan, J. Quintanilla, J. Mesot, T. Shiroka, Time - Reversal Symmetry Breaking in Re-Based Su...

    2018 doi

  21. [30]

    Sha ng, T

    T. Sha ng, T. Shiroka, Time -Reversal Symmetry Breaking in Re -Based Superconductors: Recent Developments, Front. Phys. 9 (2021) 651163. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.651163

    2021

  22. [31]

    Stolze, F.A

    K. Stolze, F.A. Cevallos, T. Kong, R.J. Cava, High-entropy alloy superconductors on an α-Mn lattice, J. Mater. Chem. C 6 (2018) 10441–10449. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC03337D

    2018 doi

  23. [33]

    Kushwaha, P.K

    R.K. Kushwaha, P.K. Meena, S. Jangid, P. Manna, T. Kumari, S. Sharma, P. Mishra, R.P. Singh, Superconductivity in new family of Rhenium -based binary alloys: Re7X3 (X = Nb, Ta, Ti, Zr, Hf ), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.07580

    doi arXiv

  24. [34]

    Shang, D.J

    T. Shang, D.J. Gawryluk, J.A.T. Verezhak, E. Pomjakushina, M. Shi, M. Medarde, J. Mesot, T. Shiroka, Structure and superconductivity in the binary Re 1-xMox alloys, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 (2019) 024801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.024801

    2019 doi

  25. [35]

    Y . Sun, T. Taen, Y . Tsuchiya, Z.X. Shi, T. Tamegai, Effects of annealing, acid and alcoholic beverages on Fe1+yTe0.6Se0.4, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26 (2013) 015015. https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/26/1/015015

    2013 doi

  26. [36]

    Z. Guo, M. Ge, Y .-Q. Zhou, J. Bi, Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, J.-T. Ye, R. Zhai, F. Ge, Y . Huang, R. Zhang, X. Yao, L. -F. Huang, Y . Cao, High resistance of superconducting TiN thin films against environ mental attacks, Mater. Horiz. 11 (2024) 5972–5982. https://doi.org/10.1039/D4MH00959B

    2024 doi

  27. [37]

    Motla, Arushi, S

    K. Motla, Arushi, S. Jangid, P.K. Meena, R.K. Kushwaha, R.P. Singh, Superconducting properties of new hexagonal and noncentrosymmetric cubic high entropy alloys, Su percond. Sci. Technol. 36 (2023) 115024. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/acfac5

    2023 doi

  28. [38]

    L. Zeng, X. Hu, S. Guo, G. Lin, J. Song, K. Li, Y . He, Y . Huang, C. Zhang, P. Yu, J. Ma, D. -X. Yao, H. Luo, Ta 4CoSi : A tantalum -rich superconductor with a honeycomb ne twork structure, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022) 134501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.134501

    2022 doi

  29. [39]

    He, Y .-X

    Y . He, Y .-X. You, L. Zeng, S. Guo, H. Zhou, K. Li, Y . Huang, P. Yu, C. Zhang, C. Cao, H. Luo, Superconductivity with the enhanced upper critical field in the Pt- doped CuRh 2Se4 spinel, Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022) 054513. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.054513

    2022 doi

  30. [40]

    L. Li, H. Tian, X. Hu, L. Zeng, K. Li, P. Yu, K. Wang, R. Chen, Z. Xiang, D. -X. Yao, H. Luo, Large upper critical fields and strong coupling superconductivity in the medium -entropy alloy (Ti 1/3Hf1/3Ta1/3)1-xNbx, Supercond. Sci. Technol. 38 (2025) 015025. https://doi.org/10....

    2025 doi

  31. [41]

    H. Su, T. Shang, F. Du, C.F. Chen, H.Q. Ye, X. Lu, C. Cao, M. Smidman, H.Q. Yuan, NbReSi: A noncentrosymetric superconductor with large upper critical field, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5 (2021) 114802. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.114802

    2021 doi

  32. [42]

    Singh, P.K

    Arushi, D. Singh, P.K. Biswas, A.D. Hillier, R.P. Singh, Unconventional superconducting properties of noncen trosymmetric Re 5.5Ta, Phys. Rev. B 101 (2020) 144508. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.144508

    2020 doi

  33. [43]

    Shang, G.M

    T. Shang, G.M. Pang, C. Baines, W.B. Jiang, W. Xie, A. Wang, M. Medarde, E. Pomjakushina, M. Shi, J. Mesot, H.Q. Yuan, T. Shiroka, Nodeless superconductivity and time -reversal symmetry breaking in the noncentrosymmetric superconductor Re 24Ti5, Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) 020502. ...

    2018 doi

  34. [44]

    L. Zeng, X. Hu, Y . Zhou, M. Boubeche, R. Guo, Y . Liu, S. Luo, S. Guo, K. Li, P. Yu, C. Zhang, W. Guo, L. Sun, D. Yao, H. Luo, Superconductivity in the High ‐ Entropy Ceramics Ti 0.Zr0.2Nb0.2Mo0.2Ta0.2Cx with Possible Nontrivial Band Topology, Adv. Sci. 11 (2024) 2305054. htt...

    2024 doi

  35. [45]

    Jacko, J.O

    A.C. Jacko, J.O. Fjærestad, B.J. Powell, A unified explanation of the Kadowaki– Woods ratio in strongly correlated metals, Nat. Phys. 5 (2009) 422–425. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1249. Table 2. The superconducting properties of the α-Mn structure HEA superconductors Paramete...

    2009 doi

  36. [1078]

    https://doi.org/10.3390/met10081078

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.