Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 54 references

The seed-carrying stalk of the linden diaspore ensures autorotating flight

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Linden diaspores use their stalk as an aerodynamic lever: steady autorotation requires the stalk to exceed about half the wing span, roughly doubling flight time compared with tumbling.

desk verdict The qualitative finding—longer stalks speed up autorotation—is solid, but the L/R_S≈0.5 threshold is not established because the short-stalk branch is censored at the 9 m drop height. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05106 v1 pith:PH4IGCSN submitted 2025-08-07 physics.bio-ph physics.flu-dyn

Annette Cazaubiel , Andreas Carlson This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-phphysics.flu-dyn
keywords lindendiasporeTiliaxeuropaeaautorotationwinddispersalstalklengthwingspanleading-edgevortexbladeelementtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks why linden diaspores carry their heavy seed pods at the end of a long stalk, and answers that the stalk is part of the flight machinery. By dropping real and synthetic diaspores with shortened stalks, it shows that the ratio of stalk length to wing span controls whether the seed settles into steady autorotation or keeps tumbling unsteadily. Steady autorotation halves descent speed and therefore roughly doubles flight time, so stalk length should matter for wind dispersal. The paper also images the flow around a model wing and finds a leading-edge vortex and a trailing-edge vortex near the wing tip that generate extra lift. It concludes that stalk length is likely a selected trait, since more than 99% of collected natural diaspores exceed the critical stalk-to-span ratio.

What carries the argument

The stalk acts as a lever arm that controls the torque balance between the aerodynamic forces on the curved bract and the weight of the pods. For the same forces and weight, a shorter stalk produces a larger torque about the tumbling axis, so the tumbling motion persists to larger angles and longer fall distances before the spin can take over. The quantitative argument is blade-element theory: the bract is divided into thin slices, each with its own local lift and drag, and the equilibrium descent speed $U$, rotation speed $\Omega$, and stalk tilt are found where the vertical force, spin torque, and tilt torque all vanish. The flow visualization supplies the lift source, a leading-edge vorte

What would settle it

Drop synthetic and natural linden diaspores with stalk-to-span ratios below 0.5 from a height of 30 m or more in still air, for example from a crane or tall building, and record the full trajectory. If any of them reach steady autorotation after falling farther than 9 m, the threshold is an artifact of the drop window; if none do even after 30 m, the threshold is a physical transition.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the peduncle of a linden diaspore ($Tilia\ x\ europaea$) is an aerodynamic control element, not just a mechanical link, and its length sets the transition between unsteady tumbling and steady autorotation. In still-air drops of biological and synthetic diaspores, the fall distance $L_m$ needed before the spin sets in shrinks as the stalk lengthens and diverges for short stalks; the data collapse when $L_m$ is normalized by the length scale $L_N=U_s^2/g$ and plotted against $l/r$, the ratio of center-of-mass offset to the wing lever arm. The criterion is that steady autorotation requires the stalk to be longer than about half the wing span, $L/R_S\gtrsim 0.5$, and mo

Load-bearing premise

The inference of a critical stalk length rests on treating the 9 m drop tower as an infinite falling distance: seeds that have not started autorotating after 9 m are classed as non-rotators, so the claimed threshold around $L/R_S=0.5$ could be set by the experimental window rather than by physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A diaspore with a natural long stalk starts autorotating almost immediately after release, so it spends nearly its whole fall in the slow spinning state rather than in fast tumbling.
  • Shortening the stalk moves the onset of autorotation past the height of a typical tree, so a slightly shorter stalk can turn a dispersing seed into a rapidly falling one.
  • Since autorotation cuts descent speed by about a factor of two, stalk length translates directly into flight time and therefore into potential wind-transport distance.
  • The effect is reproducible with synthetic diaspores of different wing geometries and weights, so the criterion is mechanical and geometric, not a peculiarity of one tree.
  • The blade-element model reproduces the plateau and divergence of the onset distance, giving a predictive tool for when a stalked-wing seed will autorotate.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the 9 m drop height is the censoring limit, the true threshold could be lower than $L/R_S\approx 0.5$; a longer-drop test would tell whether the threshold is physical or an artifact of the observation window.
  • The same lever-arm idea suggests a passive control strategy for micro-air vehicles: moving the payload along a stalk switches the flight mode between fast tumbling and slow autorotation without altering the wing.
  • The log-normal distribution of $L/R_S$ across 859 sampled diaspores hints at selection, but a direct test would compare dispersal distances of short- versus long-stalked diaspores or compare related Tilia species with different stalk geometries.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the aerodynamic role of the stalk (peduncle) in linden diaspores (Tilia x europaea). Through free-fall experiments on biological and synthetic diaspores with shortened stalks, the authors observe that longer stalks lead to earlier onset of autorotation and a roughly twofold reduction in descent speed. They propose a critical stalk-length-to-wing-span ratio L/R_S ≈ 0.5 for steady autorotation, support this with a data collapse using L_N = U_s^2/g and l/r, and present PTV measurements in water showing leading- and trailing-edge vortices on a curved synthetic wing. The paper also reports that more than 99% of 859 collected diaspores satisfy the proposed threshold, suggesting an evolutionary interpretation.

Significance. The question is significant because it identifies a specific morphological trait—stalk length—as an aerodynamic control element in wind dispersal, with a quantitative design rule that could inform bio-inspired micro-air vehicles. The experimental program is a strength: direct free-fall tests on biological and synthetic diaspores, matched Reynolds and Strouhal numbers, and publicly archived data. The PTV flow measurements provide a plausible physical mechanism (tip-concentrated leading- and trailing-edge vortices). However, the central quantitative threshold is not yet established because it is derived from data censored by the 9 m fall height; the short-stalk branch that produces the divergence in Fig. 3b is precisely the branch where no autorotation was observed within the experimental window. This makes the headline claim conditional on an assumption about unobserved long-fall behavior.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Fig. 3b] The threshold L/R_S ≈ 0.5 is inferred from the divergence of L_m/L_N for short stalks. In Section III and Fig. 3b, L_m is set to 9 m whenever no autorotation is observed in the experimental window. These are right-censored observations: 'no autorotation in 9 m' is not equivalent to 'no autorotation ever,' and the divergent branch is composed of exactly these hollow markers. Assigning a finite 9 m value to an unobserved event treats the window limit as a physical transition. The Methods also describe experiments at 2 m, 5 m, and 9 m, but the paper does not state which censoring limit applies to each point, even though all hollow markers are assigned 9 m. No survival analysis or longer-fall test is provided. The central quantitative claim therefore rests on an unverified assumption about short-stalk behavior outside the observation window.
  2. [Section III, definition of L_N] The collapse in Fig. 3b uses the normalization L_N = U_s^2/g, where U_s is the steady descent velocity of the same diaspore with its longest stalk. Because U_s is itself an outcome measured from the same flight experiments, the normalization is not independent of the data being collapsed. The authors should demonstrate that the collapse is robust when U_s is estimated from an independent relation such as Eq. (A1) (weight/area scaling) or from a fixed reference stalk length; otherwise part of the apparent universality of the curve may be introduced by the normalization. This is secondary to the censoring issue but affects the quantitative form of the proposed design rule.
  3. [Section III, Figs. 2b and 3b] The stated result is a threshold in L/R_S, but the data collapse and divergence are plotted against l/r, where l is the distance between the wing and the center of mass and r is the horizontal distance defined in Fig. 2b. These ratios are not identical, and the text does not explicitly derive the mapping from l/r > 1 to L/R_S ≈ 0.5. Please state the relationship used (e.g., r ≈ R_S/2 for the tested geometries) and show that the threshold is insensitive to this mapping; as written, the reader cannot reproduce the conversion from the plotted variable to the headline claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The last sentence says 'For longer stalks (c) and (d)' but the context requires 'shorter stalks'; the wording is inconsistent with the preceding sentence.
  2. [Eq. (A4)] The drag force expression repeats C_L(alpha); it should be C_D(alpha).
  3. [Section III and Fig. 3b caption] 'decent height' should be 'descent height' in the two places where the 9 m experimental window is described.
  4. [Fig. 1d] The log-normal fit parameters are given, but no goodness-of-fit measure or uncertainty is reported; please add a quantitative assessment of the fit.
  5. [Appendix A.3] The Methods state that experiments were performed at 2 m, 5 m, and 9 m fall heights, but it is not specified which data points in Figs. 3a/b come from which height. This is important for interpreting the censoring limit and should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the central autorotation threshold is an experimental observable; self-citations and the U_s^2/g normalization are non-load-bearing, and the 9 m censoring is a transparency limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim — that a stalk length above about half the wing span is needed for steady autorotation — is established by direct flight experiments on biological and synthetic diaspores, not by a fitted model or by a quantity that is defined in terms of the conclusion. The descent-distance L_m is measured from image sequences, and the threshold follows from where autorotation initiates or fails to initiate within the 9 m fall. No equation in the paper reduces the predicted threshold to its own input. The flagged items are not circular: (1) The normalization L_N = U_s^2/g uses the steady descent velocity of the same diaspore with its longest stalk; this is a data-collapse with a measured scale, not a fitted parameter, and the dimensional inset of Fig. 3b shows the same qualitative divergence. (2) The blade-element model in the SM adopts lift/drag coefficients from the authors' prior work [32] (built on [47]), but this supporting model is not used to produce the main experimental threshold; it only rationalizes the torque argument. (3) The paper transparently states that hollow markers correspond to cases where no autorotation was observed within 9 m and that L_m was then set to 9 m ('If there is no steady autorotation observed within the experimental window of 9 m, we set L_m = 9 m'). This is a censoring limitation that may affect the precision of the short-stalk branch of Fig. 3b, but it is an experimental-window issue, not a circular derivation: no equation equates the threshold to the censoring choice. Accordingly, there is no specific circular step to quote; the score of 2 reflects only minor non-load-bearing self-citations, not actual circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The main quantitative claims rest on measured parameters (U_s) and an experimental censoring rule. The model uses published aerodynamic coefficients rather than fitted coefficients, so the free-parameter count is low.

free parameters (2)
  • U_s (steady descent velocity of the diaspore with the longest stalk tested) = measured per sample
    Used to define L_N = U_s^2/g, the normalizing length in Fig. 3b. It is a measured input, not fitted to the transition data, but the data collapse depends on it.
  • Critical stalk-to-span ratio L/R_S = ~0.5
    Read off the data collapse in Fig. 3b and the biological sample distribution. The paper gives no confidence interval or formal estimator for this threshold.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Quasi-steady blade element theory with lift and drag coefficients from Wang et al. (2004) and a camber offset describes the autorotating equilibrium.
    SM Section 7; the model is used to interpret the trends, not to derive the central threshold.
  • domain assumption Reynolds and Strouhal number matching between air and water experiments ensures comparable vortex structures and lift.
    Section II and SM 5; flow similarity is assumed, not demonstrated by a direct comparison in both fluids.
  • domain assumption Cutting the stalk and compensating with Blu-Tack isolates the effect of stalk length (center of mass position) without changing other aerodynamic properties.
    SM 3; the wing geometry is unchanged, but the attachment and mass distribution may change subtly when the stalk is shortened.
  • ad hoc to paper The 9 m fall height is a censoring limit: no autorotation within 9 m is treated as no autorotation at any height.
    Section III states L_m is set to 9 m for hollow markers; this cap directly shapes the divergence at small stalk lengths in Fig. 3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The seed-carrying stalk of the linden diaspore ensures autorotating flight." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PH4IGCSN

@misc{pith2026250805106,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The seed-carrying stalk of the linden diaspore ensures autorotating flight},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PH4IGCSN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05106}
}
read the original abstract

The dispersal of seeds by wind is one of the most evolved mechanisms plants use to invade new territories. Linden trees grow diaspores with a curved bract acting as a wing, where the seed pods are connected underneath by a stalk. Besides the seed-carrying capacity, the other functions of the stalk remain unknown. We demonstrate that the stalk of linden (genus Tilia L.) diaspores plays an essential role in their flight. The stalk length to wing span ratio is found to be the key parameter for facilitating steady autorotating flight in Tilia x europaea diaspores, effectively doubling their flight time compared to an unsteady tumbling motion. Flight experiments with biological and synthetic diaspores reveal a critical stalk length needed to induce autorotation, which correlates with analysis of collected biological samples and points to a possible evolutionarily selected trait. Flow measurements show that the vortical structures around the curved wing cause the elevated lift force during the autorotating flight.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.05106 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: (a) Left: A sketch of an adult linden tree of the species [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Superposition of images of the flight of a diaspore from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Example of pictures from two different angles taken from the collected linden seeds to measure their geometrical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Trajectories of the pods for different stalk length. (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Blue: Vertical velocity of the pods as a function of the vertical position, orange: relative horizontal positions of the tip [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: (a) Set-up for the 3D flow measurements in water. (b) Synthetic diaspore used for the measurements in water. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: (a) and (b) Schematic of the diaspore with its main geometric properties and representation of the aerodynamic forces [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: (a) Values of the lift and drag coefficients as a function (b), (c) and (d) value of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Data availability All the data used in this paper is available on the platform sigma2 (DOI: https://doi.org/10.11582/2025.dy02we3f) [46]

    work page doi:10.11582/2025.dy02we3f 2025

  2. [2]

    All found seeds were collected as samples as long as their stem and their wing were undamaged

    Collection of biological samples A total of 859 biological samples of dispersal from the speciesTilia x europeaewere picked up on the ground next to linden trees at five different locations in Oslo specified in Table Ia. All found seeds were collected as samples as long as their stem and their wing were undamaged. We then took two images at different angl...

    work page

  3. [3]

    We also used synthetic diaspores with controlled geometrical properties for flight experiments

    Flight experiments with collected samples and synthetic diaspores Four of the collected biological samples were used to perform flight experiments. We also used synthetic diaspores with controlled geometrical properties for flight experiments. In order to make these synthetic diaspores, we print a cambered and curved rectangular mold with a Form 3 3D-prin...

    work page

  4. [4]

    The curved and cambered wing of the diaspore was printed with our Form3 3D-printer by Formlabs

    PTV measurements around synthetic fruits in water In order to observe the structure of the fluid flow around the wing, we performed flight experiments in a water tank with synthetic diaspores. The curved and cambered wing of the diaspore was printed with our Form3 3D-printer by Formlabs. A stainless steel stalk of diameter of 3 mm was then attached to it....

    work page

  5. [5]

    The dimensions and weight of the synthetic diaspores were chosen so that the Reynolds and the Strouhal numbers would be of the same order as the one of the biological samples

    Scaling analysis The main characteristics of the biological samples and the synthetic diaspores in air and water are shown in table Ic. The dimensions and weight of the synthetic diaspores were chosen so that the Reynolds and the Strouhal numbers would be of the same order as the one of the biological samples. As water is more viscous than air, the synthe...

    work page

  6. [6]

    From𝑈andΩ, we get𝑅𝑒and𝑆𝑡for diaspores of different weight and different geometry

    Steady state Once they have reached their steady state the diaspores fall at a constant velocity𝑈and rotate at a constant angular velocityΩ. From𝑈andΩ, we get𝑅𝑒and𝑆𝑡for diaspores of different weight and different geometry. If we balance the vertical aerodynamic force with the weight, the vertical velocity should follow the simple relationship [20]: 𝑈∝ √︁ ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    We decompose the wing in thin element of length𝑑𝑙

    Blade Element Theory To describe the steady state motion of the linden diaspore, we compute the contribution of the aerodynamic forces by using the blade element theory. We decompose the wing in thin element of length𝑑𝑙. The draft and the lift forces,𝐹 𝐷 and𝐹 𝐿 are calculated locally on each blade element and then their contribution is integrated over the...

    work page 2000

  8. [8]

    Azuma and K

    A. Azuma and K. Yasuda, Flight performance of rotary seeds, Journal of Theoretical Biology (1989)

    work page 1989

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    R. Bengtsson,Variation in common lime (Tilia x europaea L.) in Swedish Gardens of the 17th and 18th centuries, 64 (Doctoral thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, 2005)

    2005

  2. [10]

    Wolff, O

    K. Wolff, O. K. Hansen, S. Couch, L. Moore, H. Sander, and S. A. Logan, Tilia cultivars in historic lime avenues and parks in the uk, estonia and other european countries, Urban Forestry and Urban Greening43, 126346 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Pigott, The clones of common lime (tilia×vulgaris hayne) planted in england during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, New Phytologist121, 487 (1992)

    D. Pigott, The clones of common lime (tilia×vulgaris hayne) planted in england during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, New Phytologist121, 487 (1992)

    1992

  4. [12]

    Weber, Ecosystem services provided by urban vegetation: A literature review, inUrban Environment, edited by S

    C. Weber, Ecosystem services provided by urban vegetation: A literature review, inUrban Environment, edited by S. Rauch, G. Morrison, S. Norra, and N. Schleicher (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2013) pp. 119–131

    2013

  5. [13]

    Varshney, S

    K. Varshney, S. Chang, S. Chang, and Z. J. Wang, The kinematics of falling maple seeds and the initial transition to a helical motion, Nonlinearity25(2012)

    2012

  6. [14]

    Vogel, Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms, American Zoologist24, 37 (1984)

    S. Vogel, Drag and flexibility in sessile organisms, American Zoologist24, 37 (1984)

    1984

  7. [15]

    De Langre, Effects of wind on plants, Annu

    E. De Langre, Effects of wind on plants, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.40, 141 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Vogel,Comparative biomechanics: life’s physical world(Princeton University Press, 2013)

    S. Vogel,Comparative biomechanics: life’s physical world(Princeton University Press, 2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Vogel, Drag and reconfiguration of broad leaves in high winds, Journal of Experimental Botany40, 941 (1989)

    S. Vogel, Drag and reconfiguration of broad leaves in high winds, Journal of Experimental Botany40, 941 (1989). 13 (a) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 (b) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 (c) 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 (d) FIG. 10: (a) Values of the ...

    1989

  10. [18]

    Burrows, Wind-borne seed and fruit movement, New phytologist75, 405 (1975)

    F. Burrows, Wind-borne seed and fruit movement, New phytologist75, 405 (1975)

    1975

  11. [19]

    C. K. Augspurger, Morphology and dispersal potential of wind-dispersed diaspores of neotropical trees, American journal of Botany73, 353 (1986)

    1986

  12. [20]

    Cummins, M

    C. Cummins, M. Seale, A. Macente, D. Certini, I. M. Viola, and N. Nakayama, A separated vortex ring underlies the flight of the dandelion, Nature562, 10.1038/s41586-018-0604-2 (2018)

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    McCutchen, The spinning rotation of ash and tulip tree samaras, Science197, 691 (1977)

    C. McCutchen, The spinning rotation of ash and tulip tree samaras, Science197, 691 (1977)

    1977

  14. [22]

    Lentink and M

    D. Lentink and M. H. Dickinson, Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings, The Journal of Experimental Biology324(2009)

    2009

  15. [23]

    Azuma and Y

    A. Azuma and Y. Okuno, Flight of a samara, alsomitra macrocarpa, Journal of Theoretical Biology129, 263 (1987)

    1987

  16. [24]

    Rabault, R

    J. Rabault, R. A. Fauli, and A. Carlson, Curving to fly: Synthetic adaptation unveils optimal flight performance of whirling fruits., Physical Review Letters122(2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Attenborough,The private life of plants: a natural history of plant behaviour.(BBC Books, 1995)

    D. Attenborough,The private life of plants: a natural history of plant behaviour.(BBC Books, 1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    Nathan, G

    R. Nathan, G. G. Katul, H. S. Horn, S. M. Thomas, R. Oren, R. Avissar, S. W. Pacala, and S. A. Levin, Mechanisms of long-distance dispersal of seeds by wind, Nature418, 409 (2002)

    2002

  19. [27]

    ˚Ake Norberg, Autorotation, self-stability, and structure of single-winged fruits and seeds (samaras) with comparative remarks on animal flight, Biological Reviews48(1973)

    R. ˚Ake Norberg, Autorotation, self-stability, and structure of single-winged fruits and seeds (samaras) with comparative remarks on animal flight, Biological Reviews48(1973)

    1973

  20. [28]

    D. F. Greene and E. A. Johnson, Seed mass and dispersal capacity in wind-dispersed diaspores, Oikos67, 69 (1993)

    1993

  21. [29]

    Yasuda and A

    K. Yasuda and A. Azuma, The autorotation boundary in the flight of samaras, Journal of Theoretical Biology185(1997)

    1997

  22. [30]

    Hou, J.-D

    Z.-B. Hou, J.-D. Zhang, Y.-D. Li, Y.-X. Jia, and W.-X. Huang, Aerodynamic significance of mass distribution on samara descent (2024), 14 2411.08997 [physics.flu-dyn]

    2024 arXiv

  23. [31]

    R. A. Stevenson, D. Evangelista, and C. V. Looy, When conifers took flight: a biomechanical evaluation of an imperfect evolutionary takeoff, Paleobiology41, 205 (2015)

    2015

  24. [32]

    S. B. Field, M. Klaus, M. Moore, and F. Nori, Chaotic dynamics of falling disks, Nature388, 252 (1997)

    1997

  25. [33]

    J. C. Maxwell, On a particular case of the descent of a heavy body in a resisting medium, inThe Scientific Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, Cambridge Library Collection - Physical Sciences (Cambridge University Press, 2011) p. 115–118

    2011

  26. [34]

    P. Ern, F. Risso, D. Fabre, and J. Magnaudet, Wake-induced oscillatory paths of bodies freely rising or falling in fluids, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics44, 97 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Mahadevan, W

    L. Mahadevan, W. S. Ryu, and A. D. T. Samuel, Tumbling cards, Physics of Fluids11, 1 (1999), https://pubs.aip.org/aip/pof/article- pdf/11/1/1/19154573/1 1 online.pdf

    1999

  28. [36]

    Andersen, U

    A. Andersen, U. Pesavento, and Z. J. Wang, Analysis of transitions between fluttering, tumbling and steady descent of falling cards, Journal of Fluid Mechanics541, 91–104 (2005)

    2005

  29. [37]

    Auguste, J

    F. Auguste, J. Magnaudet, and D. Fabre, Falling styles of disks, Journal of Fluid Mechanics719, 388–405 (2013)

    2013

  30. [38]

    Tinklenberg, M

    A. Tinklenberg, M. Guala, and F. Coletti, Thin disks falling in air, Journal of Fluid Mechanics962, A3 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    R. A. Fauli, J. Rabault, and A. Carlson, Effect of wing fold angles on the terminal descent velocity of double-winged autorotating seeds, fruits, and other diaspores., Physical Review E100(2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    C. K. Augspurger and K. P. Hogan, Wind dispersal of fruits with variable seed number in a tropical tree (lonchocarpus pentaphyl- lus: leguminosae), American Journal of Botany70, 1031 (1983), https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/j.1537- 2197.1983.tb07903.x

    1983

  33. [41]

    Gan, J.-C

    S.-R. Gan, J.-C. Guo, Y.-X. Zhang, X.-F. Wang, and L.-J. Huang, ”phoenix in flight”: an unique fruit morphology ensures wind dispersal of seeds of the phoenix tree (firmiana simplex (l.) w. wight)., BMC Plant Biology22(2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    O. B. Hansen, Tilia x europaea – norges vanligste bytre, Park og anlegg1(2020)

    2020

  35. [43]

    A. L. Koch, The logarithm in biology 1. mechanisms generating the log-normal distribution exactly, Journal of theoretical biology12, 276 (1966)

    1966

  36. [44]

    Limpert, W

    E. Limpert, W. A. Stahel, and M. Abbt, Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues: on the charms of statistics, and how mechanical models resembling gambling machines offer a link to a handy way to characterize log-normal distributions, which can provide deep...

    2001

  37. [45]

    Gr ¨onholm and A

    T. Gr ¨onholm and A. Annila, Natural distribution, Mathematical biosciences210, 659 (2007)

    2007

  38. [46]

    Walker, J

    M. Walker, J. U. Hammel, F. Wilde, T. Hoehfurtner, S. Humphries, and R. Schuech, Estimation of sinking velocity using free-falling dynamically scaled models: Foraminifera as a test case, Journal of Experimental Biology224, jeb230961 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    S. R. Manchester, Inflorescence bracts of fossil and extant tilia in north america, europe, and asia: patterns of morphologic divergence and biogeographic history, American Journal of Botany81, 1176 (1994)

    1994

  40. [48]

    Jia, G.-S

    L.-B. Jia, G.-S. Nam, T. Su, G. W. Stull, S.-F. Li, Y.-J. Huang, and Z.-K. Zhou, Fossil fruits of firmiana and tilia from the middle miocene of south korea and the efficacy of the bering land bridge for the migration of mesothermal plants, Plant Diversity43, 480 (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    B. H. Kim, K. Li, J.-T. Kim, Y. Park, H. Jang, X. Wang, S. M. Won, H. Yoon, G. Lee, W. J. Jang, K. H. Lee, T. S. Chung, Z. Ma, Y. H. Jung, S. Y. Heo, Y. Lee, J. Kim, T. Cai, Y. Kim, P. Prasopsukh, Y. Yu, X. Yu, R. Avila, H. Luan, H. Song, F. Zhu, Y. Zhao, L. Chen, S. H. Han, J...

    2021

  42. [50]

    Kim, H.-J

    J.-T. Kim, H.-J. Yoon, S. Cheng, F. Liu, S. Kang, S. Paudel, D. Cho, H. Luan, M. Lee, G. Jeong, J. Park, Y.-T. Huang, S. E. Lee, M. Cho, G. Lee, M. Han, B. H. Kim, J. Yan, Y. Park, S. Jung, L. P. Chamorro, and J. A. Rogers, Functional bio-inspired hybrid fliers with separated ...

    2024

  43. [51]

    Ulrich, J

    E. Ulrich, J. Grauer, D. Pines, J. Hubbard, and S. Humbert, Identification of a robotic samara aerodynamic/multi-body dynamic model, inAIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference(2010) p. 8233

    2010

  44. [52]

    A. M. E. Makdah, L. Sanders, K. Zhang, and D. E. Rival, The stability of leading-edge vortices to perturbations on samara-inspired rotors: a novel solution for gust resistance., Bioinspiration and Biomimetics15(2019)

    2019

  45. [53]

    Cazaubiel and A

    A. Cazaubiel and A. Carlson, Flight of linden diaspore 2 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Z. J. Wang, J. M. Birch, and M. H. Dickinson, Unsteady forces and flows in low reynolds number hovering flight:two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments, Journal of Experimental Biology207, 449 (2004)

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.