Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Rotation Equivariant Arbitrary-scale Image Super-Resolution

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper builds the first arbitrary-scale super-resolution network that is rotation equivariant end to end: for 90-degree rotations the equivariance error is exactly zero, for other angles it is bounded, and the reworked INRs gain PSNR wi

desk verdict Useful p4 plug-in for rotation equivariant ASISR, but the p8/p16 theory overreaches because the B-Conv basis isn't closed under 45° rotations. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05160 v1 pith:363UHAOU submitted 2025-08-07 cs.CV

Qi Xie , Jiahong Fu , Zongben Xu , Deyu Meng This is my paper
classification cs.CV MSC 68T0768U10
keywords rotationequivariancearbitrary-scalesuper-resolutionimplicitneuralrepresentationerroranalysisfilterparameterizationbicubicinterpolationplug-and-playINRgroup-equivariantnetworks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Arbitrary-scale super-resolution (ASISR) builds a continuous image function from a low-resolution input so that any magnification can be sampled from it. This paper's claim is that the entire ASISR pipeline—encoder plus the implicit neural representation (INR)—can be made rotation equivariant for the first time: if the input image is rotated by 90 degrees, running the network gives the same result as running the network and rotating the output, with a guaranteed error bound for other angles. To get there, the paper redesigns the INR into three rotation-equivariant layer types whose group-indexed feature shifts mirror coordinate rotations, and it replaces the harmonic or Fourier filter bases of rotation-equivariant convolutions with bicubic-interpolated kernels. Applied to the standard INRs LIIF, OPE, and LTE, the method lowers equivariance error by three orders of magnitude, raises PSNR on in-scale and out-scale benchmarks with fewer parameters, and transfers to hyperspectral and thermal imagery.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the group-indexed feature tensor $F$ of size $h\times w\times n\times t$, whose fourth index labels the rotation group, and the local INR operator built from three equivariant layers: the input layer $H_{ij}(x,B)=\sum_A \varphi(W_{in}^{B^{-1}A}, F_{ij}^{A}, A^{-1}x)$, the intermediate layer $\hat{H}_{ij}(x,A)=\sum_B W^{A^{-1}B}\cdot H_{ij}(x,B)$, and the output layer $f_{ij}(x)=\psi\bigl(W_{out}^{2}(\sum_A W_{out}^{1}\cdot \hat{H}_{ij}(x,A))\bigr)$. Each layer shifts the group index by the inverse rotation precisely when the coordinate is rotated by that rotation, which is the property that makes composition over $L$ layers equivariant (Theorem 1). The encoder side

What would settle it

Recompute the p4 equivariance error on 100 DIV2K test images with a trained Rot-E LTE model: if the NMSE between $\Phi(\pi_A(I))$ and $\pi_A(\Phi(I))$ is not near the reported $10^{-4}$–$10^{-3}$ (while the original LTE sits near 0.3), the central claim fails. Independently, implement Eq. (33) literally with $x$ rather than $A^{-1}x$ and test on p8: if the error does not follow the predicted $C\delta+\hat{C}/t$ bound, the printed formula does not realize the claimed equivariance.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the INR—the module inside an arbitrary-scale super-resolution network that maps local latent codes and continuous coordinates to pixel values—can be rebuilt so that the whole network is rotation equivariant end to end. The construction matches a rotation of the input coordinate with a cyclic shift of the feature tensor along the rotation-group dimension, so the input, intermediate, and output layers of the INR are equivariant by construction (Theorem 1). The paper proves that with a 2- or 4-element rotation group, the global SR map commutes exactly with the rotation (Corollary 3), and that for arbitrary rotation angles the equivariance error is at most $C\de

Load-bearing premise

The end-to-end guarantee assumes that rotating the local image patch acts on the feature tensor $F_{ij}$ exactly as a cyclic shift along the rotation-group dimension together with spatial rotation; this is exact only when the sampling grid is invariant under the rotation (the p4 group with $t=4$), so for p8 and p16 grids the approximation error is not tightly quantified.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With a p4 rotation group, the method guarantees that rotating the LR input by 90 degrees and upsampling equals upsampling and then rotating the HR output exactly; measured equivariance error drops from roughly 1.0 NMSE for standard LIIF/OPE/LTE to $10^{-3}$–$10^{-4}$.
  • Existing ASISR methods can be converted to rotation-equivariant versions by swapping in the three-layer Rot-E INR scheme; the paper validates this on LIIF, OPE, and LTE, with the best SwinIR-LTE gaining 0.2 dB on Urban100 $\times2$ and trimming parameters from 13.7M to 7.7M.
  • For arbitrary rotation angles, the equivariance error is bounded by $C\delta+\hat{C}/t$, so finer low-resolution grids and larger rotation groups push the error toward zero.
  • The bicubic-basis filter parameterization (B-Conv) represents filter kernels more accurately than harmonic- or Fourier-basis approaches, producing the strongest SR results among the compared parameterizations, and can be swapped into existing rotation-equivariant convolution encoders.
  • Trained on natural images, the Rot-E versions improve SR reconstruction when transferred to hyperspectral (CAVE) and thermal datasets without retraining.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One consequence the authors do not quantify is that end-to-end equivariance acts as a continuous data augmentation: the network's outputs are exactly consistent under the training group, so the effective sample count for rotationally symmetric patterns should be larger than for a comparable non-equivariant network; measuring training-set-size curves would test this.
  • The construction is modular in the choice of $\varphi$ and $\psi$, so any current or future INR whose core operation is a function of concatenated features and coordinates can likely be wrapped in the same input/intermediate/output layers; the paper only demonstrates LIIF, OPE, and LTE.
  • Self-flagged scope limit: the paper's conclusion concedes that for images whose local features are not rotationally symmetric (e.g., rainy images), strict fixed-angle equivariance may not improve and could hurt, so real deployments should assess the rotational symmetry of the target domain before adopting the method.
  • The general-group claim for the LTE instantiation rests on Eq. (33), which as printed uses $x$ rather than the $A^{-1}x$ required by Eq. (7); a literal implementation with $x$ would not be equivariant for $t>4$, so that formula is worth checking against the intended derivation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a rotation-equivariant arbitrary-scale image super-resolution (ASISR) framework. The INR module is redesigned into group-convolution-style input, intermediate, and output layers with parameter sharing over a discrete rotation group, and the encoder is constructed with a bicubic-spline-parameterized rotation-equivariant convolution (B-Conv), plus a simplified Rot-E transformer. The authors prove (or state proofs to be in a supplement) that the local INR is exactly rotation equivariant on its group, that the global INR has equivariance error bounded by Cδ, and that the full network has error bounded by Cδ for discrete rotations and Cδ + Ĉ/t for arbitrary angles, with exact equality for the p4 (90-degree) group. Experiments on DIV2K and standard benchmarks report large reductions in equivariance error, consistent PSNR improvements across LIIF, OPE, and LTE backbones, parameter reductions, and generalization to hyperspectral and thermal images. Code is provided.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a useful advance: it appears to be the first ASISR method with end-to-end rotation equivariance, and the modular design allows existing INRs to be converted to Rot-E versions in a plug-and-play manner. The p4 exactness result is clean and the empirical equivariance-error tables are striking (e.g., Table 1: NMSE drops from ~1.0 to ~2e-4). The release of code and the parameter-sharing structure are also strengths. However, the p8/p16 approximate equivariance claim is not established for the proposed B-Conv encoder, and one of the three concrete INR instantiations (Rot-E LTE) is written incorrectly in Eq. (33). Because the central theoretical contribution is the equivariance analysis and its architectural realization, these gaps need to be repaired before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.3.1, Eq. (35); Theorem 3 / Corollary 4] The B-Conv basis is closed under p4 rotations but not under p8/p16 rotations. The span of tensor-product cubic B-splines on a square lattice is invariant under 90-degree rotations only; rotating a basis element by 45 degrees gives a spline with diagonal break lines that is not in the span of Eq. (35). Therefore a B-Conv layer cannot represent the exactly rotated filters required for t=8 or t=16, and the premise of Theorem 3 (an exactly equivariant encoder) fails for the proposed encoder at those groups. Corollary 4's O(Ĉ/t) term accounts only for approximating an arbitrary continuous rotation by a nearby group element in an exactly equivariant network; it does not include this basis-closure error, which is independent of δ and does not vanish as the mesh size goes to zero. Table 2's nonzero p8/p16 errors are consistent with this gap, but the theory does not quantify it. Please add the m
  2. [Sec. 3.2.4, Eq. (33)] The Rot-E LTE formula does not follow from the input-layer definition in Eq. (7). In Eq. (7), the coordinate argument is A^{-1}x and the feature index is the group element A (up to reindexing). Eq. (33), as printed, uses x instead of A^{-1}x and uses a double sum over A,B with F^{B^{-1}A}; this is not the composition of the proposed equivariant modules. Consequently, Theorem 1 and Corollary 1 do not apply to the Rot-E LTE instantiation as written, and since LTE-EQ is one of the three architectures evaluated experimentally, the claim that the tested method satisfies the equivariance theorem is not supported. Please correct Eq. (33) to match Eq. (7), or explain the intended index convention.
  3. [Sec. 3.2.3, Theorems 1-3] The main proofs are deferred: the text repeatedly states "please see the supplementary material," but the arXiv version contains no supplementary file. Theorems 1-3 and Corollaries 2-4 are load-bearing for the paper's central claims, and the current manuscript does not allow the reader to verify the equivariance-error bounds or the p4 exactness. Please include the full proofs in the submission, either in the main text or in a complete supplement.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1), Sec. 3.1] The index set for k is written as "k=0,2,...,t-1"; it should be "k=0,1,...,t-1".
  2. [Eq. (27), Sec. 3.2.4] The label "f^{E-OPE}" for the Rot-E LIIF example appears to be a typo; it should be "f^{E-LIIF}".
  3. [Sec. 4.1, Table 3/4] Some table entries appear corrupted or duplicated, e.g., the EDSR/LIIF x2 PSNR is listed as 32.18 for both Urban100 and BSD100, and several columns in Tables 3 and 4 are misaligned. Please regenerate the tables.
  4. [Sec. 3.2 and Sec. 4.1] Typos: "AISSR" should be "ASISR" (Sec. 3.2), "ERSD" should be "EDSR" (Sec. 4.1), "texting set" should be "testing set" (Sec. 4.2), and "represention" appears in a figure caption.
  5. [References] References [18] and [69] appear to describe the same work ("Rotation equivariant proximal operator for deep unfolding methods in image restoration") in different venues; please distinguish or de-duplicate them.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the equivariance theorems follow from explicit module definitions; only minor non-load-bearing self-citations.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Theorems 1–3 and Corollaries 1–4 are algebraic consequences of the explicit module definitions in Eqs (7)–(9) together with the stated smoothness/boundedness assumptions; the equivariance property is constructed, not fitted. The empirical equivariance-error tables verify the architectural property against non-equivariant baselines; no parameter is fitted to the claimed zero or O(δ) error, so the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern does not apply. The only author self-citations occur where [25] (F-Conv) is used as a starting point for the encoder and where [69] is cited for finiteness of the product F in Theorem 3; that finiteness follows from the theorem's own assumptions (finite layers, bounded compactly supported filters), so the citation is not load-bearing. There are genuine correctness risks outside circularity: the B-Conv bicubic basis (Eq 35) is not closed under 45°/22.5° rotations, so the p8/p16 bounds of Theorem 3/Corollary 4 may not apply to the proposed encoder; and Eq (33) for Rot-E LTE writes cos(π F̃ x) rather than cos(π F̃ A^{-1}x) required by Eq (7). These are soundness gaps, not circular reductions. The paper also states its own limitation about images lacking 360° rotational symmetry (Conclusion). None of these make the derivation equivalent to its inputs, so the circularity score is low (2, reflecting only minor non-load-bearing self-citations).

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, fields, dimensions, or conserved quantities are proposed. B-Conv is a filter parametrization method, not an invented entity. The theory relies on smoothness and boundedness assumptions about images and filters, plus standard group-convolution background.

free parameters (3)
  • rotation group size t = 4, 8, or 16 in experiments
    Discrete subgroup chosen by the user; controls exactness at t=4 versus approximation and appears in the Corollary 4 bound. Not fitted to data but central to the equivariance claim.
  • filter kernel size p = 5x5
    Set to 5x5 following prior Rot-E convolution works [17,25]; affects parameter count and the B-Conv bicubic basis construction.
  • local ensemble coordinate epsilon = about 1e-7
    Small constant added to coordinates in the local ensemble process, acknowledged in the Table 1 discussion as the source of residual equivariance error; not fitted but relevant to the exactness claim.
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Group-convolution equivariance framework of G-CNN, steerable, and Fourier-parameterized convolutions [15,16,25] composes with the proposed INR layers.
    Used to build the Rot-E encoder and to justify B-Conv; accepted background in the cited literature.
  • domain assumption The continuous latent feature field e and convolution filters phi_l are smooth with bounded gradients and Hessians and compact support (Eqs 16 and 19).
    These bounds keep the equivariance error bound C delta finite in Theorems 2 and 3; sharp edges and high-frequency filters can violate smoothness.
  • domain assumption Nearest-neighbor coordinate assignment in Eq (11) is consistent with rotation for group-aligned grids.
    The global assembly uses argmin over pixel positions; exactness for t=4 requires the nearest pixel to rotate correctly under the group.
  • domain assumption The constant F = product over layers of n_{l-1} p^2 F_l is finite, cited from the authors' previous work [69].
    Used in Theorem 3 to keep the bound finite; not re-derived in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Rotation Equivariant Arbitrary-scale Image Super-Resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/363UHAOU

@misc{pith2026250805160,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Rotation Equivariant Arbitrary-scale Image Super-Resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/363UHAOU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05160}
}
read the original abstract

The arbitrary-scale image super-resolution (ASISR), a recent popular topic in computer vision, aims to achieve arbitrary-scale high-resolution recoveries from a low-resolution input image. This task is realized by representing the image as a continuous implicit function through two fundamental modules, a deep-network-based encoder and an implicit neural representation (INR) module. Despite achieving notable progress, a crucial challenge of such a highly ill-posed setting is that many common geometric patterns, such as repetitive textures, edges, or shapes, are seriously warped and deformed in the low-resolution images, naturally leading to unexpected artifacts appearing in their high-resolution recoveries. Embedding rotation equivariance into the ASISR network is thus necessary, as it has been widely demonstrated that this enhancement enables the recovery to faithfully maintain the original orientations and structural integrity of geometric patterns underlying the input image. Motivated by this, we make efforts to construct a rotation equivariant ASISR method in this study. Specifically, we elaborately redesign the basic architectures of INR and encoder modules, incorporating intrinsic rotation equivariance capabilities beyond those of conventional ASISR networks. Through such amelioration, the ASISR network can, for the first time, be implemented with end-to-end rotational equivariance maintained from input to output. We also provide a solid theoretical analysis to evaluate its intrinsic equivariance error, demonstrating its inherent nature of embedding such an equivariance structure. The superiority of the proposed method is substantiated by experiments conducted on both simulated and real datasets. We also validate that the proposed framework can be readily integrated into current ASISR methods in a plug \& play manner to further enhance their performance.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Image-to-Image Translation Framework Embedded with Rotation Symmetry Priors

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rotation-equivariant convolutions and adaptive TL-Conv layers are added to I2I networks to preserve rotation symmetry and improve translation quality across domains.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Super- resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview.IEEE signal processing magazine, 20(3):21–36, 2003

    Sung Cheol Park, Min Kyu Park, and Moon Gi Kang. Super- resolution image reconstruction: a technical overview.IEEE signal processing magazine, 20(3):21–36, 2003

    2003

  2. [2]

    Super-resolution reconstruction of image sequences.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(9):817–834, 1999

    Michael Elad and Arie Feuer. Super-resolution reconstruction of image sequences.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 21(9):817–834, 1999

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 38(2):295– 307, 2015

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Image super-resolution using deep convolutional networks.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 38(2):295– 307, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Deep learning for single image super-resolution: A brief review.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(12):3106–3121, 2019

    Wenming Yang, Xuechen Zhang, Yapeng Tian, Wei Wang, Jing- Hao Xue, and Qingmin Liao. Deep learning for single image super-resolution: A brief review.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 21(12):3106–3121, 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 43(10):3365–3387, 2020

    Zhihao Wang, Jian Chen, and Steven CH Hoi. Deep learning for image super-resolution: A survey.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 43(10):3365–3387, 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    Learning continuous image representation with local implicit image function

    Yinbo Chen, Sifei Liu, and Xiaolong Wang. Learning continuous image representation with local implicit image function. InPro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 8628–8638, 2021. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANAL YSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2025 16 TABLE 7 Average equivariant error on p4 rotation group ...

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Local texture estimator for implicit representation function

    Jaewon Lee and Kyong Hwan Jin. Local texture estimator for implicit representation function. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1929– 1938, 2022

    work page 1929

  8. [8]

    Ope-sr: Orthogonal position encoding for designing a parameter-free upsampling module in arbitrary-scale image super-resolution

    Gaochao Song, Qian Sun, Luo Zhang, Ran Su, Jianfeng Shi, and Ying He. Ope-sr: Orthogonal position encoding for designing a parameter-free upsampling module in arbitrary-scale image super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10009–10020, 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 81 references
  1. [9]

    Ciaosr: Continuous implicit attention-in-attention net- work for arbitrary-scale image super-resolution

    Jiezhang Cao, Qin Wang, Yongqin Xian, Yawei Li, Bingbing Ni, Zhiming Pi, Kai Zhang, Yulun Zhang, Radu Timofte, and Luc Van Gool. Ciaosr: Continuous implicit attention-in-attention net- work for arbitrary-scale image super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on...

    2023

  2. [10]

    Ultrasr: Spa- tial encoding is a missing key for implicit image function-based arbitrary-scale super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12716, 2021

    Xingqian Xu, Zhangyang Wang, and Humphrey Shi. Ultrasr: Spa- tial encoding is a missing key for implicit image function-based arbitrary-scale super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.12716, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Meta-sr: A magnification-arbitrary network for super-resolution

    Xuecai Hu, Haoyuan Mu, Xiangyu Zhang, Zilei Wang, Tieniu Tan, and Jian Sun. Meta-sr: A magnification-arbitrary network for super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1575–1584, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Going deeper with convolutions

    Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1–9, 2015

    2015

  5. [13]

    Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer

    Jingyun Liang, Jiezhang Cao, Guolei Sun, Kai Zhang, Luc Van Gool, and Radu Timofte. Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 1833–1844, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    Scale-aware dynamic network for continuous-scale super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.15655, 2021

    Hanlin Wu, Ning Ni, and Libao Zhang. Scale-aware dynamic network for continuous-scale super-resolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.15655, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Group equivariant convolutional networks

    Taco Cohen and Max Welling. Group equivariant convolutional networks. InInternational conference on machine learning, pages 2990–2999. PMLR, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    General e (2)-equivariant steerable cnns.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019

    Maurice Weiler and Gabriele Cesa. General e (2)-equivariant steerable cnns.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019

    2019

  9. [17]

    Pdo-econvs: Partial differential operator based equivariant con- volutions

    Zhengyang Shen, Lingshen He, Zhouchen Lin, and Jinwen Ma. Pdo-econvs: Partial differential operator based equivariant con- volutions. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 8697–8706. PMLR, 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Rotation equiv- ariant proximal operator for deep unfolding methods in image restoration.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

    Jiahong Fu, Qi Xie, Deyu Meng, and Zongben Xu. Rotation equiv- ariant proximal operator for deep unfolding methods in image restoration.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution

    Bee Lim, Sanghyun Son, Heewon Kim, Seungjun Nah, and Ky- oung Mu Lee. Enhanced deep residual networks for single image super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 136–144, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    Residual dense network for image super-resolution

    Yulun Zhang, Yapeng Tian, Yu Kong, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Residual dense network for image super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2472–2481, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks

    Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. InProceedings of the European confer- ence on computer vision (ECCV), pages 286–301, 2018

    2018

  14. [22]

    Group symmetry in pac learning

    Bryn Elesedy. Group symmetry in pac learning. InICLR 2022 workshop on geometrical and topological representation learning, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Approximation- generalization trade-offs under (approximate) group equivariance

    Mircea Petrache and Shubhendu Trivedi. Approximation- generalization trade-offs under (approximate) group equivariance. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANAL YSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2025 17 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:61936–61959, 2023

    2025

  16. [24]

    Generalization error of deep neural networks: Role of classification margin and data structure

    Jure Sokoli´ c, Raja Giryes, Guillermo Sapiro, and Miguel RD Ro- drigues. Generalization error of deep neural networks: Role of classification margin and data structure. In2017 International Conference on Sampling Theory and Applications (SampTA), pages 147–151. IEEE, 2017

    2017

  17. [25]

    Fourier series expansion based filter parametrization for equivariant convolu- tions.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022

    Qi Xie, Qian Zhao, Zongben Xu, and Deyu Meng. Fourier series expansion based filter parametrization for equivariant convolu- tions.IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Learning a deep convolutional network for image super- resolution

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, Kaiming He, and Xiaoou Tang. Learning a deep convolutional network for image super- resolution. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 184–

  19. [27]

    Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks

    Jiwon Kim, Jung Kwon Lee, and Kyoung Mu Lee. Accurate image super-resolution using very deep convolutional networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1646–1654, 2016

    2016

  20. [28]

    zero-shot

    Assaf Shocher, Nadav Cohen, and Michal Irani. “zero-shot” super- resolution using deep internal learning. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3118– 3126, 2018

    2018

  21. [29]

    Accelerat- ing the super-resolution convolutional neural network

    Chao Dong, Chen Change Loy, and Xiaoou Tang. Accelerat- ing the super-resolution convolutional neural network. InCom- puter Vision–ECCV 2016: 14th European Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 11-14, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 14, pages 391–

    2016

  22. [30]

    Deep laplacian pyramid networks for fast and accurate super-resolution

    Wei-Sheng Lai, Jia-Bin Huang, Narendra Ahuja, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Deep laplacian pyramid networks for fast and accurate super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 624–632, 2017

    2017

  23. [31]

    Fast and accurate image super-resolution with deep lapla- cian pyramid networks.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 41(11):2599–2613, 2018

    Wei-Sheng Lai, Jia-Bin Huang, Narendra Ahuja, and Ming-Hsuan Yang. Fast and accurate image super-resolution with deep lapla- cian pyramid networks.IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 41(11):2599–2613, 2018

    2018

  24. [32]

    A fully progressive approach to single-image super- resolution

    Yifan Wang, Federico Perazzi, Brian McWilliams, Alexan- der Sorkine-Hornung, Olga Sorkine-Hornung, and Christopher Schroers. A fully progressive approach to single-image super- resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshop...

    2018

  25. [33]

    Deep back-projection networks for super-resolution

    Muhammad Haris, Gregory Shakhnarovich, and Norimichi Ukita. Deep back-projection networks for super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1664–1673, 2018

    2018

  26. [34]

    Feedback network for image super-resolution

    Zhen Li, Jinglei Yang, Zheng Liu, Xiaomin Yang, Gwanggil Jeon, and Wei Wu. Feedback network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3867–3876, 2019

    2019

  27. [35]

    Kxnet: A model-driven deep neural network for blind super-resolution

    Jiahong Fu, Hong Wang, Qi Xie, Qian Zhao, Deyu Meng, and Zongben Xu. Kxnet: A model-driven deep neural network for blind super-resolution. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vision, pages 235–253. Springer, 2022

    2022

  28. [36]

    Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks

    Yulun Zhang, Kunpeng Li, Kai Li, Lichen Wang, Bineng Zhong, and Yun Fu. Image super-resolution using very deep residual channel attention networks. InECCV, 2018

    2018

  29. [37]

    Pre-trained image processing transformer

    Hanting Chen, Yunhe Wang, Tianyu Guo, Chang Xu, Yiping Deng, Zhenhua Liu, Siwei Ma, Chunjing Xu, Chao Xu, and Wen Gao. Pre-trained image processing transformer. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 12299–12310, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Arbitrary-scale super- resolution via deep learning: A comprehensive survey.Information Fusion, 102:102015, 2024

    Hongying Liu, Zekun Li, Fanhua Shang, Yuanyuan Liu, Liang Wan, Wei Feng, and Radu Timofte. Arbitrary-scale super- resolution via deep learning: A comprehensive survey.Information Fusion, 102:102015, 2024

    2024

  31. [39]

    Multi-scale image super- resolution via a single extendable deep network.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 15(2):253–263, 2020

    Huanrong Zhang, Jie Xiao, and Zhi Jin. Multi-scale image super- resolution via a single extendable deep network.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 15(2):253–263, 2020

    2020

  32. [40]

    Learning a single network for scale- arbitrary super-resolution

    Longguang Wang, Yingqian Wang, Zaiping Lin, Jungang Yang, Wei An, and Yulan Guo. Learning a single network for scale- arbitrary super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF interna- tional conference on computer vision, pages 4801–4810, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Srwarp: Generalized image super-resolution under arbitrary transformation

    Sanghyun Son and Kyoung Mu Lee. Srwarp: Generalized image super-resolution under arbitrary transformation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 7782–7791, 2021

    2021

  34. [42]

    Cascaded local implicit transformer for arbitrary-scale super-resolution

    Hao-Wei Chen, Yu-Syuan Xu, Min-Fong Hong, Yi-Min Tsai, Hsien- Kai Kuo, and Chun-Yi Lee. Cascaded local implicit transformer for arbitrary-scale super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 18257– 18267, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Local implicit normalizing flow for arbitrary- scale image super-resolution

    Jie-En Yao, Li-Yuan Tsao, Yi-Chen Lo, Roy Tseng, Chia-Che Chang, and Chun-Yi Lee. Local implicit normalizing flow for arbitrary- scale image super-resolution. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1776– 1785, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Implicit diffusion models for continuous super-resolution

    Sicheng Gao, Xuhui Liu, Bohan Zeng, Sheng Xu, Yanjing Li, Xi- aoyan Luo, Jianzhuang Liu, Xiantong Zhen, and Baochang Zhang. Implicit diffusion models for continuous super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 10...

    2023

  37. [45]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    Jonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, and Pieter Abbeel. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  38. [46]

    Joint implicit image function for guided depth super-resolution

    Jiaxiang Tang, Xiaokang Chen, and Gang Zeng. Joint implicit image function for guided depth super-resolution. InProceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pages 4390– 4399, 2021

    2021

  39. [47]

    Learning continuous representation of audio for arbitrary scale su- per resolution

    Jaechang Kim, Yunjoo Lee, Seunghoon Hong, and Jungseul Ok. Learning continuous representation of audio for arbitrary scale su- per resolution. InICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 3703–

    2022

  40. [48]

    Intratomo: self-supervised learning-based tomography via sinogram synthesis and prediction

    Guangming Zang, Ramzi Idoughi, Rui Li, Peter Wonka, and Wolfgang Heidrich. Intratomo: self-supervised learning-based tomography via sinogram synthesis and prediction. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1960–1970, 2021

    1960

  41. [49]

    Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.Advances in neural information processing systems, 25:1097–1105, 2012

    Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks.Advances in neural information processing systems, 25:1097–1105, 2012

    2012

  42. [50]

    Ti-pooling: transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in convolutional neural networks

    Dmitry Laptev, Nikolay Savinov, Joachim M Buhmann, and Marc Pollefeys. Ti-pooling: transformation-invariant pooling for feature learning in convolutional neural networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 289–297, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Polar transformer networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01889, 2017

    Carlos Esteves, Christine Allen-Blanchette, Xiaowei Zhou, and Kostas Daniilidis. Polar transformer networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.01889, 2017

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Learning invariant representa- tions with local transformations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6418, 2012

    Kihyuk Sohn and Honglak Lee. Learning invariant representa- tions with local transformations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.6418, 2012

    2012 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Delv- ing deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Delv- ing deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. InProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 1026–1034, 2015

    2015

  46. [54]

    Oriented response networks

    Yanzhao Zhou, Qixiang Ye, Qiang Qiu, and Jianbin Jiao. Oriented response networks. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Com- puter Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 519–528, 2017

    2017

  47. [55]

    Rotation equivariant vector field networks

    Diego Marcos, Michele Volpi, Nikos Komodakis, and Devis Tuia. Rotation equivariant vector field networks. InProceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5048–5057, 2017

    2017

  48. [56]

    Harmonic networks: Deep translation and rotation equivariance

    Daniel E Worrall, Stephan J Garbin, Daniyar Turmukhambetov, and Gabriel J Brostow. Harmonic networks: Deep translation and rotation equivariance. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 5028–5037, 2017

    2017

  49. [57]

    Hexaconv

    Emiel Hoogeboom, Jorn WT Peters, Taco S Cohen, and Max Welling. Hexaconv. InInternational Conference on Learning Rep- resentations, 2018

    2018

  50. [58]

    Learning steerable filters for rotation equivariant cnns

    Maurice Weiler, Fred A Hamprecht, and Martin Storath. Learning steerable filters for rotation equivariant cnns. InProceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 849–858, 2018

    2018

  51. [59]

    Pdo-es2cnns: Partial differential operator based equivariant spherical cnns

    Zhengyang Shen, Tiancheng Shen, Zhouchen Lin, and Jinwen Ma. Pdo-es2cnns: Partial differential operator based equivariant spherical cnns. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 35, pages 9585–9593, 2021

    2021

  52. [60]

    Efficient equivariant network.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:5290–5302, 2021

    Lingshen He, Yuxuan Chen, Yiming Dong, Yisen Wang, Zhouchen Lin, et al. Efficient equivariant network.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:5290–5302, 2021

    2021

  53. [61]

    Group equivari- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANAL YSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2025 18 ant stand-alone self-attention for vision

    David W Romero and Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier. Group equivari- IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANAL YSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2025 18 ant stand-alone self-attention for vision. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2020

    2025

  54. [62]

    InUncertainty in Artificial Intel- ligence, pages 2356–2366

    Renjun Xu, Kaifan Yang, Ke Liu, and Fengxiang He.e(2)- equivariant vision transformer. InUncertainty in Artificial Intel- ligence, pages 2356–2366. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  55. [63]

    Lietransformer: Equiv- ariant self-attention for lie groups

    Michael J Hutchinson, Charline Le Lan, Sheheryar Zaidi, Emilien Dupont, Yee Whye Teh, and Hyunjik Kim. Lietransformer: Equiv- ariant self-attention for lie groups. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 4533–4543. PMLR, 2021

    2021

  56. [64]

    Equiv- ariant neural networks for inverse problems.Inverse Problems, 37(8):085006, 2021

    Elena Celledoni, Matthias J Ehrhardt, Christian Etmann, Brynjulf Owren, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb, and Ferdia Sherry. Equiv- ariant neural networks for inverse problems.Inverse Problems, 37(8):085006, 2021

    2021

  57. [65]

    Equivariant plug-and-play image reconstruction

    Matthieu Terris, Thomas Moreau, Nelly Pustelnik, and Julian Tachella. Equivariant plug-and-play image reconstruction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 25255–25264, 2024

    2024

  58. [66]

    Equivariant multi-modality image fusion

    Zixiang Zhao, Haowen Bai, Jiangshe Zhang, Yulun Zhang, Kai Zhang, Shuang Xu, Dongdong Chen, Radu Timofte, and Luc Van Gool. Equivariant multi-modality image fusion. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 25912–25921, 2024

    2024

  59. [67]

    Equivariant imag- ing for self-supervised hyperspectral image inpainting

    Shuo Li, Mike Davies, and Mehrdad Yaghoobi. Equivariant imag- ing for self-supervised hyperspectral image inpainting. In2024 International Workshop on the Theory of Computational Sensing and its Applications to Radar, Multimodal Sensing and Imaging (CoSeRa), pages 26–30. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  60. [68]

    Universal equivariant multilayer percep- trons

    Siamak Ravanbakhsh. Universal equivariant multilayer percep- trons. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 7996–

  61. [69]

    Rotation equivariant proximal operator for deep unfolding methods in image restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15701, 2023

    Jiahong Fu, Qi Xie, Deyu Meng, and Zongben Xu. Rotation equivariant proximal operator for deep unfolding methods in image restoration.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.15701, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Image interpolation techniques in digital im- age processing: an overview.International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(10):70–73, 2014

    Shreyas Fadnavis. Image interpolation techniques in digital im- age processing: an overview.International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 4(10):70–73, 2014

    2014

  63. [71]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale.arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929, 2020

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa De- hghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale.arXiv preprint arXi...

    2010 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Methods and results

    Radu Timofte, Eirikur Agustsson, Luc Van Gool, Ming-Hsuan Yang, and Lei Zhang. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Methods and results. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 114–125, 2017

    2017

  65. [73]

    Single im- age super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars

    Jia-Bin Huang, Abhishek Singh, and Narendra Ahuja. Single im- age super-resolution from transformed self-exemplars. InProceed- ings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 5197–5206, 2015

    2015

  66. [74]

    A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics

    David Martin, Charless Fowlkes, Doron Tal, and Jitendra Malik. A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. InProceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICC...

    2001

  67. [75]

    On single image scale-up using sparse-representations

    Roman Zeyde, Michael Elad, and Matan Protter. On single image scale-up using sparse-representations. InInternational conference on curves and surfaces, pages 711–730. Springer, 2010

    2010

  68. [76]

    Low-complexity single-image super- resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding

    Marco Bevilacqua, Aline Roumy, Christine Guillemot, and Marie Line Alberi-Morel. Low-complexity single-image super- resolution based on nonnegative neighbor embedding. 2012

    2012

  69. [77]

    Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study

    Eirikur Agustsson and Radu Timofte. Ntire 2017 challenge on single image super-resolution: Dataset and study. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops, pages 126–135, 2017

    2017

  70. [78]

    Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Dslr-quality photos on mobile devices with deep convolutional networks

    Andrey Ignatov, Nikolay Kobyshev, Radu Timofte, Kenneth Van- hoey, and Luc Van Gool. Dslr-quality photos on mobile devices with deep convolutional networks. InProceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision, pages 3277–3285, 2017

    2017

  72. [80]

    Generalized assorted pixel camera: postcapture control of resolution, dynamic range, and spectrum.IEEE transactions on image processing, 19(9):2241–2253, 2010

    Fumihito Yasuma, Tomoo Mitsunaga, Daisuke Iso, and Shree K Nayar. Generalized assorted pixel camera: postcapture control of resolution, dynamic range, and spectrum.IEEE transactions on image processing, 19(9):2241–2253, 2010

    2010

  73. [81]

    Thermal image super-resolution: a novel architecture and dataset

    Rafael E Rivadeneira, Angel D Sappa, and Boris X Vintimilla. Thermal image super-resolution: a novel architecture and dataset. InInternational Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applica- tions, pages 1–2. nn, 2020. Qi Xiereceived the B.Sc. and Ph.D degree from Xi’an Jiao...

    2020

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.