Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 57 references

Fusion and Fission of Particle-like Chiral Nematic Vortex Knots

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that knotted vortex lines called heliknotons in a chiral nematic liquid crystal can be fused and split by electric pulses while the integer Hopf index of the director field stays exactly conserved through every re-linking e

desk verdict A strong experimental demonstration of electric-field-controlled fusion/fission of vortex knots in chiral nematics, wrapped around a conservation-law claim that is mathematically forced by continuity of n(r) rather than an independent empirical discovery. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.05841 v1 pith:GVMQZDMX submitted 2025-08-07 cond-mat.soft

Darian Hall , Jung-Shen Benny Tai , Louis H. Kauffman , Ivan I. Smalyukh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft MSC 57K1082D30 PACS 61.30.Jf61.30.-v
keywords vortexknotsheliknotonsHopfindexchiralnematicliquidcrystaltopologicalsolitonsbandsurgeryreconnectionselectro-opticcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that knotted vortex lines in a chiral nematic liquid crystal—objects called heliknotons—can be made to fuse together and split apart on demand by applying short electric pulses. Across every fusion, fission, and re-linking event, an integer-valued quantity called the Hopf index $Q$ of the director field remains exactly conserved, playing the role of a baryon number for these soft-matter 'vortex atoms.' Because the host medium's molecular twist is undefined along the vortex cores, the knots are stable structures embedded in an otherwise twisted background, and their reconnections realize mathematical band surgeries and connected sums of knots in a directly observable way. If the claims hold, this turns abstract knot theory into an electrically controllable resource for liquid-crystal electro-optics and photonics, and gives a laboratory model for conservation laws that appear in particle physics and cosmology.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the integer Hopf index $Q$ of the vectorized director field $n(r)$, defined by the integral $Q = \frac{1}{64\pi^2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3}\epsilon_{ijk} A_i F_{jk}\,d^3r$ where $F_{ij}=\epsilon_{abc}n_a\partial_i n_b\partial_j n_c$ and $A_i$ is the vector potential of $F$. It serves as the conserved 'baryon number': additive under fusion and unchanged under re-linking. Reconnections of the vortex lines occur in the helical-axis field, whose singular cores carry local winding numbers $\pm 1/2$; strand exchange proceeds by annihilation of opposite-winding fragments, so the director field itself stays nonsingular and $Q$ remains well defined throughout.

What would settle it

Record a single fusion event with three-photon emission fluorescence polarizing microscopy at a frame rate faster than the sub-second response time and reconstruct the vectorized director field in every voxel at the moment of strand exchange; if any two preimage loops of the same point on the order-parameter sphere intersect, or if the director orientation cannot be assigned without introducing a cut, then $Q$ is not defined at that instant and the conservation law as stated fails. Alternatively, numerically minimize the paper's elastic free-energy functional for a pair of heliknotons with del

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that heliknotons—topological solitons with hopfion topology in the director field $n(r)$, whose singular vortex lines reside in the helical-axis field—undergo fusion and fission while the cumulative Hopf index $Q$ stays constant. $Q$ is computed by the standard integral expression $Q = \frac{1}{64\pi^2}\int_{\mathbb{R}^3} \epsilon_{ijk} A_i F_{jk}\,d^3r$, with $F_{ij}=\epsilon_{abc}n_a\partial_i n_b\partial_j n_c$ and $A_i$ the corresponding vector potential. Experimentally, two trefoil-shaped vortex knots approaching with their separation vector parallel to the helical axis fuse into a connected-sum composite, while pairs meeting at oblique angles reconnect at two s

Load-bearing premise

The conservation claim rests on the director field $n(r)$ staying continuous and single-valued at the instant vortex strands exchange, and on the reconstructed vortex-line knot types being faithful despite isosurface smoothing; neither is established as a theorem with error bars.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $Q$ is conserved through every reconnection, then all reachable re-linking states from a given heliknoton configuration share the same total Hopf index, so $Q$ acts as a superselection label for the dynamics.
  • Reversible electric switching between trefoil knots and multi-component links means the same pair of knots can be fused and split repeatedly, enabling knot-state toggling in liquid-crystal devices at sub-second timescales.
  • Fusion of arrays of elementary heliknotons produces stable knotted graphs with $Q$ equal to the number of elementary constituents, forming composite structures analogous to high-baryon-number nuclei or the original vortex-atom model of chemical elements.
  • The relative reconnection number $|R_A - R_B|$ gives a lower bound on the number of band surgeries needed to convert one $Q$-conserving state into another, and for the observed positive-crossing knots this bound matches the observed number of reconnections.
  • Writhe is conserved in elementary fusion/fission but not in internal reconnections, providing an observable way to distinguish these transformation classes in experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conservation law is tied only to continuity of $n(r)$, then similar electric-pulse fusion protocols should transfer to other hopfion hosts such as chiral magnets, where knotted solitons of the same topology exist; a magnetic thin-film analogue would be a direct test.
  • The paper's path from elementary knots to multi-component arrays suggests a practical 'topological adder': any pulse sequence that merges heliknotons yields a state whose Hopf index is the sum of the inputs, independent of the detailed pathway, so arithmetic could be encoded directly in the knot array.
  • Because the paper identifies a hypothetical sequence of band surgeries that could produce an achiral knot from chiral ones, a targeted search for such achiral composites in opposite-handed or racemic hosts would probe whether molecular chirality is truly required for stability of the fused states.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports experimental and numerical observations of vortex knots ('heliknotons') in chiral nematic liquid crystals. These are solitonic structures in the director field n(r) whose singularities reside in the helical-axis field χ(r), termed 'dischiralation' vortex lines. The authors show that electric pulses can drive fusion, fission, and re-linking of these vortex knots, and they claim a conserved cumulative Hopf index Q, defined in n(r), through all observed transformations. They support the observations with polarizing optical microscopy, three-photon fluorescence polarizing microscopy, and Frank-Oseen energy-minimization simulations, and they analyze the knot topologies using band surgeries, writhe, and reconnection numbers.

Significance. If fully substantiated, this work would be a striking demonstration of electrically controlled, reversible topological transformations of particle-like vortex knots in a soft-matter system, with potential implications for electro-optics, photonics, and knot-theory-guided device concepts. The paper benefits from direct imaging by POM and 3PEF-PM, quantitative comparison with numerical relaxations, repeated fusion/fission switching, and explicit computation of Hopf indices before and after transformations. However, the central claim that Q is conserved during reconnection is a homotopy consequence of the asserted continuity of n(r), so the empirical weight of that claim depends on evidence that n(r) remains continuous and single-valued through the transient. The manuscript does not provide such time-resolved evidence, and simulations by construction cannot falsify a transient discontinuity. The energy-lowering claim is also currently unsupported by free-energy data. The topological classification would be strengthened by validation of smoothing and reconstruction procedures.

major comments (4)
  1. [p. 7-8, Eq. (1), Extended Data Fig. 6] The conservation of the Hopf index Q during fusion/fission/re-linking is the central claim, but Q is a homotopy invariant of n(r). Therefore the claim is only as strong as the assertion that n(r) remains continuous and single-valued through the reconnection transient. The manuscript states this continuity based on visual inspection (Fig. 1e, p. 4-5) but reports Q only for initial and final states (Extended Data Fig. 6), not as a time series. Since the simulations use smooth n(r) by construction, they cannot test a possible transient singularity. Please either provide a time-resolved computation of Q (or preimage linking) across a reconnection from the numerical fields, or explicitly reframe Q conservation as a necessary consequence of the assumed continuity and supply quantitative resolution evidence that no n(r) discontinuity is present.
  2. [p. 3] The sentence 'our soft matter analogues of fusion and fission always lead to lower energy of the final state' is a strong physical claim, but no free-energy data are presented. Because the applied voltage changes the energy landscape, 'lower energy' needs to be specified (fixed voltage? after relaxation?) and substantiated with computed free energies for at least the pathways in Figs. 2 and 3. Without this, the statement is an unsupported assertion that does not follow from the reported imaging and knot-length data.
  3. [Methods, 'Visualization and topological characterization' (p. 24-25)] The vortex knots are reconstructed from isosurfaces, then Taubin-smoothed and converted to graphs. Taubin smoothing may, in principle, alter crossing number or link type if the sampling is coarse or if the smoothing radius is large relative to the feature size. The paper does not validate that the smoothed topology matches the raw extracted data (e.g., by computing invariants before/after smoothing) or compare against the known numerical ground truth. Since the knot classifications and reconnection pathways are load-bearing, please add a sensitivity check or a statement of the spatial resolution and smoothing parameters.
  4. [p. 9] The discussion of the 'relative reconnection number' states that |R_A - R_B| is 'found to be the lower bound and in some special instances equals the number of reconnections that we observe.' For general positive knots, the relation between the difference of reconnection numbers and the minimal number of reconnections is not always equality. Please clarify whether this is a theorem for the specific diagrams in Extended Data Fig. 9, or a conjecture/observation, and define the precise sense in which it is a lower bound.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] 'decay to simple r counterparts' appears to be a typo; should likely read 'simple ring counterparts' or similar.
  2. [Fig. 1e] The color-sphere representation of director orientation is visually dense. Consider adding a simplified 2D schematic and explicitly labeling the north/south poles in the figure itself for clarity.
  3. [Main text and Methods] Equation numbering is confusing: the Hopf index integral is Eq. (1) in the main text, while the free energy functional is also Eq. (1) in the Methods. Renumber the Methods equation or label as Methods Eq. (1).
  4. [p. 4] The term 'dischiralation' is new and important. Please define it more explicitly in one dedicated paragraph, distinguishing it from existing concepts such as disclinations in the director field.
  5. [Extended Data Fig. 6] The numerically computed Hopf indices are listed without error bars or convergence criteria. State the numerical tolerance and box size used for the integral (Eq. 1).
  6. [Methods, 'Fusion and fission response times'] The time calibration (0.205 ms per iteration) is stated without details; specify the number of iterations used for calibration and the sensitivity of the extracted response times to this value.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Hopf-index conservation is a homotopy-invariance consequence of the paper's independently asserted continuity of n(r); no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—conservation of the cumulative Hopf index Q through fusion, fission, and re-linking—is not circular. Q is defined by the Whitehead integral (Eq. 1) for a continuous unit director field n: R^3 -> S^2 compactified to S^3, and homotopy invariance of the Hopf invariant is a standard mathematical theorem, not an input fitted to data. The empirical content lies in the paper's assertion, based on vectorized 3PEF-PM imaging and numerical relaxation, that n(r) remains continuous through the reconnection events while only the helical-axis field chi(r) becomes singular. That assertion is an independent observation/assumption, not derived from Q conservation. The numerically computed Hopf indices matching the initialized charges are a consistency check of the integration code, not a fitted prediction presented as evidence of the conservation law. Experimental preimage linking provides an independent route to Q. Self-citations to prior work by the same group (e.g., Refs. 10, 38, 48) supply background, ansatz, and homotopy classification, but the conservation claim does not reduce to any of these citations. The main weakness—absence of a time-resolved Hopf integral through the reconnection transient—is a verification gap and a continuity-assumption risk, not a circular derivation. Hence no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the continuity of the director field through reconnections and on the standard Hopf-invariant formalism. The initial Q values are chosen in the ansatz, so the conservation observed is a built-in feature of the definitions plus the continuity assumption. The Frank-Oseen model supplies dynamics, and the band-surgery classification comes from prior topology literature. No new physical entities are postulated; 'dischiralation' is a new name for observed singular lines in the helical-axis field.

free parameters (6)
  • Initial Hopf charge Q per heliknoton = Q = 1 (elementary), with composites of Q = 2, 3, 6, 8, 18
    The ansatz Eq. (4) sets Q by hand; the total Q of fused structures is the sum of initialized charges, so the observed Q conservation is built into the initial conditions and the continuity of relaxation.
  • Numerical underrelaxation parameter α = 0.1
    Chosen empirically for solver convergence (Methods); not a physical parameter but affects the dynamical path.
  • Time calibration constant = 0.205 ms per iteration at node density 253 p^-3
    Fitted so that simulated reconnection times match the experiment of Fig. 2; used for dynamic response times, not for topological invariants.
  • Jones matrix spectral weights = 1.0, 0.6, 0.3 for λ = 650, 550, 450 nm
    Chosen to match the light source spectrum for simulated POM; not central to the topological claims.
  • Preimage tolerance η = 0.1
    Numerical tolerance for extracting Hopf preimages; affects visualization and linking number counting, though Q from the integral is independent.
  • Cutoff radius for superimposing ansatz = equal to pitch p
    Used to embed multiple heliknotons in the background; a modeling choice.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The director field n(r) remains continuous and smoothly vectorizable throughout vortex reconnections
    Asserted in Fig. 1e and the text (p. 4-5); it is the premise that makes the Hopf index well-defined and conserved.
  • domain assumption The Frank-Oseen free energy functional, with 5CB elastic constants (k11=6.4, k22=3.0, k33=10.0 pN and Δε=13.8, ε⊥=5.2), captures the physics
    Used for all numerical energy minimizations; standard but not derived in the paper.
  • standard math The Hopf index Q as defined by Eq. (1) is a well-defined integer for the compactified field n: ℝ3→S^2
    Standard Whitehead/Hopf invariant theory; cited to refs 46,47,49.
  • domain assumption The helical-axis field χ(r) obtained from the dominant eigenvector of the chirality tensor C_ij is the correct order-parameter field whose singular lines are the vortex knots
    Operational definition used for all vortex reconstruction, visualization and winding number assignments.
  • ad hoc to paper All reconnections can be classified as coherent (orientation-preserving) band surgeries
    Assumed 'for all links obtained' (Methods, Characterization of knot topology), following refs 3,45; used to compute writhe and reconnection numbers.
  • ad hoc to paper Fusion and fission always lower the free energy of the final state
    Stated in the introduction (p. 3) without presenting energy data; central to the nuclear-fission analogy.
  • standard math The vectorized preimages are linked loops whose linking number equals the Hopf index
    Standard interpretation of Hopf invariant, used in Extended Data Figs. 5-6.
invented entities (1)
  • dischiralation vortex lines independent evidence
    purpose: Name the singular lines in the helical-axis field χ(r), where twist is undefined, that form the knots and undergo fusion/fission
    The structures are directly imaged by 3PEF-PM and reproduced in simulations, so there is observational evidence independent of the paper; the term itself is new but it re-describes an observed structure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fusion and Fission of Particle-like Chiral Nematic Vortex Knots." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GVMQZDMX

@misc{pith2026250805841,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fusion and Fission of Particle-like Chiral Nematic Vortex Knots},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GVMQZDMX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.05841}
}
read the original abstract

Vortex knots have been seen decaying in many physical systems. Here we describe topologically protected vortex knots, which remain stable and undergo fusion and fission while conserving a topological invariant analogous to that of baryon number. While the host medium, a chiral nematic liquid crystal, exhibits intrinsic chirality, cores of the vortex lines are structurally achiral regions where twist cannot be defined. We refer to them as "dischiralation" vortex lines, in analogy to dislocations and disclinations in ordered media where, respectively, positional and orientational order is disrupted. Fusion and fission of these vortex knots, which we reversibly switch by electric pulses, vividly reveal the physical embodiments of knot theory's concepts like connected sums of knots. Our findings provide insights into related phenomena in fields ranging from cosmology to particle physics and can enable applications in electro-optics and photonics, where such fusion and fission processes can be used for controlling light.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Thomson, W. 4. On Vortex Atoms. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb. 6, 94–105 (1869)

    work page

  2. [2]

    Turner, J. C. & Van de Griend, P. History and Science of Knots. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1996)

    work page 1996

  3. [3]

    Kauffman, L. H. Knots and Physics. vol. 1 (World Scientific, 2001)

    work page 2001

  4. [4]

    Smalyukh, I. I. Review: knots and other new topological effects in liquid crystals and colloids. Rep. Prog. Phys. 83, 106601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    & Niemi, A

    Faddeev, L. & Niemi, A. J. Stable knot-like structures in classical field theory. Nature 387, 58–61 (1997)

    work page 1997

  6. [6]

    & Sutcliffe, P

    Manton, N. & Sutcliffe, P. Topological Solitons. (Cambridge University Press, 2004)

    work page 2004

  7. [7]

    Skyrmion Knots in Frustrated Magnets

    Sutcliffe, P. Skyrmion Knots in Frustrated Magnets. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 247203 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    Dennis, M., King, R., Jack, B. et al. Isolated optical vortex knots. Nature Phys 6, 118– 121 (2010)

    work page 2010

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Han, J. H. Skyrmions in Condensed Matter. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017)

    2017

  2. [10]

    Tai, J.-S. B. & Smalyukh, I. I. Three-dimensional crystals of adaptive knots. Science 365, 1449–1453 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    Voinescu, R., Tai, J.-S. B. & Smalyukh, I. I. Hopf Solitons in Helical and Conical Backgrounds of Chiral Magnetic Solids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 057201 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices

    Kleckner, D., Irvine, W. Creation and dynamics of knotted vortices. Nature Phys 9, 253– 258 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    Wang, K., Dutt, A., Wojcik, C. C. & Fan, S. Topological complex-energy braiding of non-Hermitian bands. Nature 598, 59–64 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Sugic, D., Droop, R., Otte, E. et al. Particle-like topologies in light. Nat Commun 12, 6785 (2021)

    2021

  7. [15]

    & Sutcliffe, P

    Naya, C. & Sutcliffe, P. Skyrmions and Clustering in Light Nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 232002 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    & Iwamoto, S

    Lin, W., Mata-Cervera, N., Ota, Y., Shen, Y. & Iwamoto, S. Space-Time Hopfion Crystals. arXiv: 2406:06096. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.06096 (2024)

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [17]

    Shnir, Y. M. Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories. (Cambridge University Press, 2018). 13

    2018

  10. [18]

    Chaikin, P. M. & Lubensky, T. C. Principles of Condensed Matter Physics. (Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  11. [19]

    & Smalyukh, I

    Meng, C., Wu, J.-S. & Smalyukh, I. I. Topological steering of light by nematic vortices and analogy to cosmic strings. Nat. Mater. 22, 64–72 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    de & Prost, J

    Gennes, P.-G. de & Prost, J. The Physics of Liquid Crystals. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    S., Lee, Y.-J., Kim, Y

    Kim, D. S., Lee, Y.-J., Kim, Y. B., Wang, Y. & Yang, S. Autonomous, untethered gait- like synchronization of lobed loops made from liquid crystal elastomer fibers via spontaneous snap-through. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh5107 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    & Wu, S.-T

    Khoo, I.-C. & Wu, S.-T. Optics and Nonlinear Optics of Liquid Crystals. (World Scientific Pub. Co, Singapore River Edge, N.J, 1993)

    1993

  15. [23]

    White, T. J. & Broer, D. J. Programmable and adaptive mechanics with liquid crystal polymer networks and elastomers. Nature Mater 14, 1087–1098 (2015)

    2015

  16. [24]

    Yeh, A. P. & Gu, C. Optics of Liquid Crystal Displays. (Wiley, Hoboken, 2010)

    2010

  17. [25]

    Lyu, P., Broer, D. J. & Liu, D. Advancing interactive systems with liquid crystal network-based adaptive electronics. Nat Commun 15, 4191 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    Liu, M. et al. Shape Morphing Directed by Spatially Encoded, Dually Responsive Liquid Crystalline Elastomer Micro‐Actuators. Advanced Materials 35, 2208613 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Sultanov, V., Kavčič, A., Kokkinakis, E. et al. Tunable entangled photon-pair generation in a liquid crystal. Nature 631, 294–299 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    & Dunkel, J

    Kos, Ž. & Dunkel, J. Nematic bits and universal logic gates. Sci. Adv. 8, eabp8371 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    S., Bukusoglu, E., De Pablo, J

    Wang, X., Miller, D. S., Bukusoglu, E., De Pablo, J. J. & Abbott, N. L. Topological defects in liquid crystals as templates for molecular self-assembly. Nature Mater 15, 106–112 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Martinez, A. et al. Mutually tangled colloidal knots and induced defect loops in nematic fields. Nature Mater 13, 258–263 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    J., Chandar, L., Schiff, E

    Bowick, M. J., Chandar, L., Schiff, E. A. & Srivastava, A. M. The Cosmological Kibble Mechanism in the Laboratory: String Formation in Liquid Crystals. Science 263, 943– 945 (1994)

    1994

  24. [32]

    & Muševič, I

    Tkalec, U., Ravnik, M., Čopar, S., Žumer, S. & Muševič, I. Reconfigurable Knots and Links in Chiral Nematic Colloids. Science 333, 62–65 (2011)

    2011

  25. [33]

    Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Diversity of Knot Solitons in Liquid Crystals Manifested by Linking of Preimages in Torons and Hopfions. Phys. Rev. X 7, 011006 (2017)

    2017

  26. [34]

    Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Static three-dimensional topological solitons in fluid chiral ferromagnets and colloids. Nature Mater 16, 426–432 (2017)

    2017

  27. [35]

    & Alexander, G

    Machon, T. & Alexander, G. P. Knots and nonorientable surfaces in chiral nematics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 14174–14179 (2013)

    2013

  28. [36]

    Jampani, V. S. R. et al. Colloidal entanglement in highly twisted chiral nematic colloids: Twisted loops, Hopf links, and trefoil knots. Phys. Rev. E 84, 031703 (2011)

    2011

  29. [37]

    J., Liu, Q

    Zhang, Q., Ackerman, P. J., Liu, Q. & Smalyukh, I. I. Ferromagnetic Switching of Knotted Vector Fields in Liquid Crystal Colloids. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 097802 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    B., Ackerman, P

    Tai, J.-S. B., Ackerman, P. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Topological transformations of Hopf solitons in chiral ferromagnets and liquid crystals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 921–926 (2018). 14

    2018

  31. [39]

    & Alexander, G

    Machon, T. & Alexander, G. P. Knotted Defects in Nematic Liquid Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 027801 (2014)

    2014

  32. [40]

    Pachos, J. K. Introduction to Topological Quantum Computation. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge; New York, 2012)

    2012

  33. [41]

    & Zhan, Q

    Teng, H., Zhong, J., Chen, J., Lei, X. & Zhan, Q. Physical conversion and superposition of optical skyrmion topologies. Photon. Res. 11, 2042 (2023)

  34. [42]

    K., Pieranski, P., Dubochet, J

    Katritch, V., Olson, W. K., Pieranski, P., Dubochet, J. & Stasiak, A. Properties of ideal composite knots. Nature 388, 148–151 (1997)

    1997

  35. [43]

    & Irvine, W

    Kleckner, D., Kauffman, L. & Irvine, W. How superfluid vortex knots untie. Nature Phys 12, 650–655 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    Milnor, J. W. Topology from the Differentiable Viewpoint. (Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J, 1997)

    1997

  37. [45]

    L. H. Kauffman. Topology of Vortex Reconnection. arXiv:2206.03056, to appear in AMS Contemp. Math. Series

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Bott, R. & Tu, L. W. Differential Forms in Algebraic Topology. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995)

    1995

  39. [47]

    Whitehead, J. H. C. An Expression of Hopf’s Invariant as an Integral. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 33, 117–123 (1947)

    1947

  40. [48]

    A., Bowick, M

    Wu, J.-S., Valenzuela, R. A., Bowick, M. J. & Smalyukh, I. I. Topological Rigidity and Non-Abelian defect junctions in chiral nematic systems with effective biaxial symmetry. arXiv: 2410.19293. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2410.19293 (2025)

    2025 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Hopf, Über die abbildungen der dreidimensionalen sphäre auf die kugelfläche

    H. Hopf, Über die abbildungen der dreidimensionalen sphäre auf die kugelfläche. Math. Ann. 104, 637–665 (1931)

    1931

  42. [50]

    Born, M. et al. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light. (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    1999

  43. [51]

    Guo, H. et al. Self-healing of optical skyrmionic beams. J. Opt. 27, 025604 (2025). 15 Figures Fig. 1 | Topological vortex reconnections in a helical twisted background of the chiral LC. a, Connected knot sum of two trefoil knots. b, Schematic of a dischiralation vortex line w...

    2025

  44. [52]

    Selinger, J. V. Interpretation of saddle-splay and the Oseen-Frank free energy in liquid crystals. Liquid Crystals Reviews 6, 129–142 (2018)

    2018

  45. [53]

    Tai, J.-S. B. & Smalyukh, I. I. Surface anchoring as a control parameter for stabilizing torons, skyrmions, twisted walls, fingers, and their hybrids in chiral nematics. Phys. Rev. E 101, 042702 (2020). 30

    2020

  46. [54]

    Curve and surface smoothing without shrinkage

    Taubin, G. Curve and surface smoothing without shrinkage. in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 852–857 (IEEE Comput. Soc. Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1995)

    1995

  47. [55]

    Scharein, R. G. & Rawdon, E. J. An Introduction to KnotPlot. in Knotted Fields (eds. Ricca, R. L. & Liu, X.) vol. 2344 281–317 (Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 2024)

    2024

  48. [56]

    & Ravnik, M

    Žumer, S., Čančula, M., Čopar, S. & Ravnik, M. Imaging and visualization of complex nematic fields. in (ed. Khoo, I. C.) 91820C (San Diego, California, United States, 2014)

    2014

  49. [57]

    L" and "R

    Poy, G. & Žumer, S. Ray-based optical visualisation of complex birefringent structures including energy transport. Soft Matter 15, 3659–3670 (2019). Acknowledgements: We thank T. Lee and H. Zhao for discussions and technical assistance. Funding: This research was supported by ...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.