Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 2 cited by

$AdS_3 \times S^3$ Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude with KK modes

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The first curvature-corrected string amplitude for arbitrary KK modes on AdS3×S3 is a worldsheet integral with weight-three single-valued multiple polylogarithms; it yields infinite strong-coupling OPE data, including C = -1/4.

desk verdict The pp11 result is solid; the general-KK amplitude rests on an unproven ansatz for the MS,MT dependence. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06039 v1 pith:JACOYFP6 submitted 2025-08-08 hep-th

Hongliang Jiang , De-liang Zhong This is my paper
classification hep-th PACS 11.25.Tq11.25.-w
keywords AdS3×S3Virasoro-ShapiroamplitudeKKmodessingle-valuedmultiplepolylogarithmsD1-D5CFTMellinstrong-couplingOPEdatacurvaturecorrection
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives the first curvature correction, at order $\lambda^{-1/2}$, to the AdS$_3\times S^3$ Virasoro–Shapiro amplitude — the curved-space counterpart of the flat-space string scattering amplitude, written as an integral over the worldsheet — for four-point scattering of arbitrary Kaluza–Klein (KK) modes in type IIB string theory on AdS$_3\times S^3\times M_4$ ($M_4=K3$ or $T^4$). The derivation proceeds in two steps: the special correlator $\langle pp11\rangle$ is fixed completely by matching a worldsheet ansatz built from single-valued multiple polylogarithms of weight three (special analytic functions built from logarithms, dilogarithms, and trilogarithms) against the conformal block expansion, and the AdS$\times S$ Mellin formalism then lifts this result to general KK labels $p_1,\dots,p_4$. If correct, this is the first curvature-corrected string amplitude for KK modes in this background, and its low-energy expansion yields an infinite set of strong-coupling anomalous dimensions and OPE coefficients in the dual D1-D5 CFT. In particular, the leading-Regge-trajectory scaling dimensions are consistent with the semiclassical folded string and determine its previously unknown one-loop coefficient as $C=-1/4$.

What carries the argument

The Borel transformation (2.18) converts the CFT Mellin amplitude into the AdS Virasoro–Shapiro amplitude $A(S,T)$, reorganizing the strong-coupling expansion in powers of $\lambda^{-1/2}$. The worldsheet ansatz expresses each curvature correction as an integral over the Riemann sphere with insertions of weight-three single-valued multiple polylogarithms $L^s_j$, $L^a_j$; matching the residues at $S$- and $T$-channel poles against the Borel-transformed Mack polynomials of the block expansion fixes all coefficients. The AdS$\times S$ Mellin formalism — a second Mellin transform on the internal $S^3$ — packages the KK data into the variables $m_s$, $m_t$, $m_u$ and is what lifts the result fro

What would settle it

Two observations would settle the claim. First, compute the one-loop correction to the folded string energy in AdS$_3\times S^3\times M_4$ directly: the paper predicts the previously undetermined coefficient $C=-1/4$ (3.53), and any other value would falsify the leading-Regge anomalous dimensions (3.51). Second, compute the first curvature correction for a specific unequal-KK correlator such as $\langle 2111\rangle$ or $\langle 2211\rangle$ by a method that does not impose the $m_s,m_t$-only dependence, and compare with (4.13); a mismatch would show the general result rests only on the Section

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The first curvature correction to the AdS$_3\times S^3$ Virasoro–Shapiro amplitude with four arbitrary KK modes is (4.13): a crossing-symmetric sum of three worldsheet integrals over the Riemann sphere with weight-three single-valued multiple polylogarithms, coefficients fixed in (4.21)–(4.22). The authors first solve $\langle pp11\rangle$ by pole-by-pole matching to the CFT block expansion, then promote to arbitrary KK labels via the AdS$\times S$ Mellin formalism (KK data enter through $m_s$, $m_t$, $m_u$). The low-energy expansion (4.23) yields infinite strong-coupling OPE data for the D1-D5 CFT; leading-Regge anomalous dimensions match the folded-string computation and fix $C=-1/4$.

Load-bearing premise

The general four-KK-mode result rests on the untested assumption that the amplitude depends on the KK labels only through the two combinations $m_s$ and $m_t$, with the worldsheet coefficients drawn from a fixed six-term polynomial basis — an assumption adopted for simplicity and symmetry rather than derived; if the true dependence is richer, the general amplitude (4.21)-(4.22) fails even though the special $\langle pp11\rangle$ result survives.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If (4.13) is correct, this is the first curvature-corrected ($\lambda^{-1/2}$) string amplitude for four arbitrary KK modes on AdS$_3\times S^3\times M_4$.
  • The low-energy expansion (4.23) yields an infinite set of anomalous dimensions and OPE coefficients for the D1-D5 CFT at strong coupling.
  • Leading-Regge-trajectory anomalous dimensions in both channels agree with the semiclassical folded-string energies and pin down the one-loop coefficient $C=-1/4$.
  • Setting $p=1$ reproduces the known $\langle 1111\rangle$ amplitude, and the $\langle pp11\rangle$ sector matches the special-case derivation, giving internal consistency checks for the whole chain.
  • The S-channel data are independent of $p$ while the T-channel data depend on $p$ explicitly — a concrete signature distinguishing the $O_pO_p\to O_1O_1$ OPE from $O_pO_1\to O_pO_1$ exchange.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: the two-step route — fix the simplest correlator by block matching, then lift via an internal-space Mellin transform — is the same pattern that worked for AdS$_5\times S^5$, so if the $m_s,m_t$-dependence assumption holds, the construction should extend to second curvature order and to correlators mixing tensor and graviton multiplets.
  • My inference: the equality of the predicted one-loop coefficient $C=-1/4$ with the AdS$_5\times S^5$ value hints that the leading quantum correction to the folded string is universal across these RR-flux AdS$\times S$ backgrounds; a one-loop determinant computation for K3, which the paper notes is still blocked by regularization issues for $T^4$, would test this directly.
  • My inference: the seven independent SVMPL coefficient functions (versus a reducible basis in AdS$_5\times S^5$) suggest that the reduced supersymmetry of AdS$_3\times S^3$ is visible in the amplitude's function space, and a similar seven-function structure may recur for other non-maximally supersymmetric backgrounds.
  • My inference: the five null integrands in appendix C fix the worldsheet integrand only up to vanishing integrals, so the amplitude and all extracted CFT data are unique; any future direct worldsheet derivation with RR fluxes will still have to choose among these representatives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the first curvature correction to the four-point string amplitude of Kaluza–Klein modes on AdS3 × S3 × M4 (M4 = K3 or T4) in type IIB string theory, i.e. the holographic dual of the D1–D5 CFT. The authors first derive the ⟨pp11⟩ Virasoro–Shapiro amplitude using a worldsheet ansatz built from single-valued multiple polylogarithms, fixing its coefficients by matching the Borel-transformed conformal block expansion, the flat-space Virasoro–Shapiro limit, and the supergravity limit. They then employ the AdS × S Mellin formalism to generalize the result to four arbitrary KK modes, ⟨p1p2p3p4⟩, obtaining the worldsheet representation (4.13) with coefficients (4.21)–(4.22), the low-energy expansion (4.23), and an infinite set of OPE data. The leading Regge-trajectory anomalous dimensions in the ⟨pp11⟩ case are compared with semiclassical folded-string results, fixing the one-loop coefficient C = −1/4.

Significance. If correct, this would be the first curvature-corrected string amplitude for arbitrary KK modes in the AdS3 × S3 background, significantly extending the AdS Virasoro–Shapiro programme to a two-dimensional holographic setup and providing strong-coupling CFT data for D1–D5. The ⟨pp11⟩ derivation appears internally consistent and reproduces the known p = 1 limit; it is a plausible and useful result. The paper is transparent in its methods, includes explicit coefficient formulas, and supplies a Mathematica notebook with the longer expressions. However, the generalization to four arbitrary KK modes rests on an explicitly assumed and largely untested ansatz for the KK-mode dependence. Because that generalization is advertised as the main result, the overall significance is conditional on justifying or independently checking that ansatz.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, eqs. (4.13)–(4.16)] The central claim of the paper is the general-KK amplitude, but the KK-dependence of the worldsheet integrand is assumed 'for simplicity and symmetry' rather than derived. The coefficients are restricted to the linear span of {Σms, Σmt, Σmu, Σ, ms, mt, mu} and, crucially, no D-type terms are included in (4.13), even though D terms were necessary for ⟨pp11⟩ with p>1. The subsequent fitting in §4.3 only uses the slice ms = p−1, mt = mu = 0. Any term proportional to mt or mu, or quadratic such as ms mt or mt², vanishes on this slice and is therefore completely unconstrained. The 'consistency check' that the general formula reduces to ⟨pp11⟩ is circular, because the coefficients were chosen to satisfy that reduction. Thus the general result (4.21)–(4.22) is not established; it could be an artifact of the truncated ansatz even if every ⟨pp11⟩ result is correct.
  2. [§4.3] Even within the truncated ansatz, the solution is not shown to be unique. The comparison with ⟨pp11⟩ fixes coefficients only along a one-dimensional slice of the (ms, mt) plane. No independent constraints from the full supergravity limit, full crossing symmetry, or general CFT data are imposed. The paper does not discuss whether the remaining coefficients are determined or by what physical input. To support the claim, the authors would need to enlarge the ansatz to include all admissible mt/mu and quadratic terms and demonstrate that they are fixed, or provide an independent derivation/check of the KK dependence.
  3. [§3.6.3 and §5] The paper itself states 'there are no alternative independent checks' for the CFT data. The only external check, the semiclassical folded-string computation, applies to the leading Regge trajectory in the ⟨pp11⟩ case and relies on a large-spin extrapolation; it does not test the general-KK amplitude. This limitation is acknowledged in the text but should be reflected in the presentation: the general-KK result is a conjecture based on a simplicity assumption, not a derivation. The abstract and conclusion should be adjusted accordingly.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.21] In (4.21), the third row has the coefficient '1/92'; this looks like a typo (perhaps 1/96 or 1/192). Please check against the Mathematica notebook.
  2. [§4.2] The sentence 'This assumption ensures manifest symmetry between the AdS and S spaces' is vague. It would help to spell out which symmetry is preserved and why the assumed dependence is the minimal consistent choice.
  3. [§5] The phrase 'Our derivation is fully self-consistent' is appropriate for the ⟨pp11⟩ part but overly strong for the general-KK extension. Consider rewording to 'consistent with the stated assumptions'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

General-KK amplitude is fixed by requiring reduction to ⟨pp11⟩, so the consistency check is by construction; mt/mu-dependent terms rest on an unproven ansatz.

  1. self definitional [Sec. 4.2–4.3, Eqs. (4.8), (4.13), (4.18)–(4.22), and text after (4.23)]
    "For simplicity and symmetry, we will further assume that M and A depend on m24, m34 only through the combinations ms, mt ... To further fix these coefficients, we can compare with the case of ⟨pp11⟩ ... In this case, ms = p − 1, mt = mu = 0 ... a direct comparison of coefficients gives the final result (4.21)-(4.22). Furthermore, one can verify that A(1)(S,T; ms = p−1, mt = 0) agrees with A(1) computed from ⟨pp11⟩. This also gives a consistency check."

    The coefficients (4.21)-(4.22) are fixed by imposing (4.18)-(4.20), i.e. by demanding that the general integrand reduce to the previously derived ⟨pp11⟩ integrand on the slice ms=p−1, mt=0. The verification that A(1)(S,T;ms=p−1,mt=0) agrees with the ⟨pp11⟩ result is therefore not an independent check; it is true by construction. Any term proportional to mt, mu, ms·mt, mt², or a D-type contribution vanishes on that slice and is unconstrained by the only matching performed. Those directions are instead set to zero by the unproven 'for simplicity and symmetry' linear-span ansatz. Hence the arbitrary-KK amplitude (4.13) is an assumed extension of the ⟨pp11⟩ result, not a derived prediction, and its consistency check is circular.

full rationale

The ⟨pp11⟩ derivation in Sec. 3 is a genuine bootstrap: the SVMPL worldsheet ansatz is fixed by matching flat-space residues, SUGRA poles, and CFT block poles; none of those anchors is the target result, and the folded-string semiclassical check is external. Self-citations to [10] and [6,7,14] are methodological and not load-bearing. The circularity is confined to Sec. 4: the general-KK amplitude is obtained by postulating a B-only ansatz with coefficients in a restricted linear span, fixing the coefficients by requiring reduction to the ⟨pp11⟩ slice, and then citing that reduction as the consistency check. The assumption that M and A depend on m24,m34 only through ms,mt (and not, say, on mt-dependent or D-type terms) is explicit but untested; the only check cannot see those directions. The paper itself notes the absence of alternative independent checks. Thus the arbitrary-KK central claim is partially circular/underdetermined: the ⟨pp11⟩ content is independent, but the generalization is fixed by construction rather than by evidence.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central computation rests on the SVMPL ansatz and on an additional functional-form assumption for the KK generalization. No numerical constants are fitted to data; all coefficients are fixed by consistency. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The worldsheet integrand at first curvature correction is a linear combination of weight-3 SVMPLs with homogeneous degree-2 polynomial coefficients in S, T (Section 3.6.1, eq. (3.44)).
    Core ansatz inherited from the emergent worldsheet program [6,7,14]; no first-principles worldsheet derivation exists for RR-flux backgrounds.
  • ad hoc to paper The amplitude depends on KK indices only through ms, mt, and the coefficients are linear combinations of {Sigma*ms, Sigma*mt, Sigma, Sigma^2, ms, mt} (Section 4.2, eqs. (4.13)-(4.16)).
    Introduced 'for simplicity and symmetry'; not derived from string theory. Load-bearing premise for the general <p1p2p3p4> result.
  • domain assumption The flat-space limit of the AdS VS amplitude is the universal flat-space Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude (2.20) for all KK modes, since all KK modes become massless.
    Standard in the AdS VS program; used to fix the O(lambda^0) amplitude.
  • domain assumption The Borel transformation (2.18) defines the AdS VS amplitude and correctly reorganizes the strong-coupling expansion (Section 2.3).
    Definition used in prior work [9,23]; accepted in this program.
  • domain assumption The supergravity Mellin amplitude (3.4) is the exact SUGRA contribution for <pp11>.
    Taken from [25] and used to match the singular parts; known from Witten diagram computations.
  • standard math Single-valued multiple polylogarithms are constructed via Brown's method (Appendix A) and their worldsheet integrals obey (3.47).
    Mathematical background; implemented in PolyLogTools.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of $AdS_3 \times S^3$ Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude with KK modes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JACOYFP6

@misc{pith2026250806039,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: $AdS_3 \times S^3$ Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude with KK modes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JACOYFP6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06039}
}
abstract

We study the first curvature correction to the string amplitude of four Kaluza--Klein (KK) modes on $AdS_3 \times S^3 \times M_4$, with $M_4=K3$ or $T^4$, in type IIB string theory, which is holographically dual to the four--point correlator $\langle \mathcal{O}_{p_1} \mathcal{O}_{p_2} \mathcal{O}_{p_3} \mathcal{O}_{p_4} \rangle$ of certain half--BPS operators in the boundary D1--D5 CFT. The result takes the form of an integral over the Riemann sphere, analogous to the flat-space Virasoro--Shapiro amplitude, but with insertions of single-valued multiple polylogarithms of weight three. Our results are obtained in two steps. First, we derive the $AdS_3 \times S^3$ Virasoro--Shapiro amplitude in the special case $\langle \mathcal{O}_{p} \mathcal{O}_{p} \mathcal{O}_{1} \mathcal{O}_{1} \rangle$, by matching the CFT block expansion with an ansatz based on single-valued multiple polylogarithms. We then employ the $AdS \times S$ Mellin formalism to generalize the result to the general case of four arbitrary KK modes $\langle \mathcal{O}_{p_1} \mathcal{O}_{p_2} \mathcal{O}_{p_3} \mathcal{O}_{p_4} \rangle$. Our analysis yields an infinite set of results for operator anomalous dimensions and OPE data in D1--D5 CFT at strong coupling. In particular, the resulting scaling dimensions of certain operators are shown to be consistent with classical string theory computations.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Energy-Energy Correlator from the AdS Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude

    hep-th 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 8.0 of 10

    A precise mapping from the world-sheet integral of the AdS Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude to the energy-energy correlator in strongly coupled N=4 SYM, with explicit flat-space and first curvature correction terms.

  2. Energy-Energy Correlators at Strong Coupling

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The strong-coupling EEC in planar N=4 SYM is now known through λ⁻² for p=2 and through λ⁻³ᐟ² for all half-BPS operators O_p, derived independently from worldsheet and low-energy Wilson-coefficient methods.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Pestun et al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories, J

    V. Pestun et al.,Localization techniques in quantum field theories, J. Phys. A50 (2017) 440301 [1608.02952]

    arXiv 2017

  2. [2]

    Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview, Lett

    N. Beisert et al.,Review of AdS/CFT Integrability: An Overview, Lett. Math. Phys.99 (2012) 3 [1012.3982]

    arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Gromov, V

    N. Gromov, V. Kazakov, S. Leurent and D. Volin,Quantum Spectral Curve for Planar N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.112 (2014) 011602 [1305.1939]

    arXiv 2014

  4. [4]

    L. F. Alday, T. Hansen and J. A. Silva,AdS Virasoro-Shapiro from dispersive sum rules, JHEP 10 (2022) 036 [2204.07542]. – 24 –

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    L. F. Alday, T. Hansen and J. A. Silva,AdS Virasoro-Shapiro from single-valued periods, JHEP 12 (2022) 010 [2209.06223]

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    L. F. Alday, T. Hansen and J. A. Silva,Emergent Worldsheet for the AdS Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude, Phys. Rev. Lett.131 (2023) 161603 [2305.03593]

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    L. F. Alday and T. Hansen,The AdS Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude, JHEP 10 (2023) 023 [2306.12786]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    L. F. Alday, S. M. Chester, T. Hansen and D.-l. Zhong,The AdS Veneziano amplitude at small curvature, JHEP 05 (2024) 322 [2403.13877]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    L. F. Alday and T. Hansen,Single-valuedness of the AdS Veneziano amplitude, JHEP 08 (2024) 108 [2404.16084]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    S. M. Chester and D.-l. Zhong,AdS3×S3 Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude with Ramond-Ramond Flux, Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 151602 [2412.06429]

    2025 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. M. Chester, T. Hansen and D.-l. Zhong,The type IIA Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude in AdS4× CP3 from ABJM theory, 2412.08689

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    D. J. Binder, S. M. Chester, S. S. Pufu and Y. Wang,N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills correlators at strong coupling from string theory and localization, JHEP 12 (2019) 119 [1902.06263]

    2019 arXiv

  5. [13]

    S. M. Chester and S. S. Pufu,Far beyond the planar limit in strongly-coupledN = 4 SYM, JHEP 01 (2021) 103 [2003.08412]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Fardelli, T

    G. Fardelli, T. Hansen and J. A. Silva,AdS Virasoro-Shapiro amplitude with KK modes, JHEP 11 (2023) 064 [2308.03683]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    B. Wang, D. Wu and E. Y. Yuan,Kaluza-Klein AdS Virasoro-Shapiro Amplitude near Flat Space, Phys. Rev. Lett.135 (2025) 041603 [2503.01964]

    2025

  8. [16]

    Eberhardt, M

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar,The Worldsheet Dual of the Symmetric Product CFT, JHEP 04 (2019) 103 [1812.01007]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Eberhardt, M

    L. Eberhardt, M. R. Gaberdiel and R. Gopakumar,Deriving the AdS3/CFT2 correspondence, JHEP 02 (2020) 136 [1911.00378]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Aharony and E

    O. Aharony and E. Y. Urbach,Type II string theory on AdS3×S3×T4 and symmetric orbifolds, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 046028 [2406.14605]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    J. R. David, G. Mandal and S. R. Wadia,Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory, Phys. Rept. 369 (2002) 549 [hep-th/0203048]

    2002 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Rastelli, K

    L. Rastelli, K. Roumpedakis and X. Zhou,AdS3 × S3 Tree-Level Correlators: Hidden Six-Dimensional Conformal Symmetry, JHEP 10 (2019) 140 [1905.11983]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Taylor,Matching of correlators in AdS(3) / CFT(2), JHEP 06 (2008) 010 [0709.1838]

    M. Taylor,Matching of correlators in AdS(3) / CFT(2), JHEP 06 (2008) 010 [0709.1838]

    2008 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Behan and R

    C. Behan and R. S. Pitombo,Mellin amplitudes for AdS3× S3, JHEP 11 (2024) 059 [2408.17420]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Penedones,Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2011) 025 [1011.1485]

    J. Penedones,Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes, JHEP 03 (2011) 025 [1011.1485]

    2011 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Okuda and J

    T. Okuda and J. Penedones,String scattering in flat space and a scaling limit of Yang-Mills correlators, Phys. Rev. D83 (2011) 086001 [1002.2641]

    2011 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Giusto, R

    S. Giusto, R. Russo, A. Tyukov and C. Wen,Holographic correlators in AdS3 without Witten diagrams, JHEP 09 (2019) 030 [1905.12314]. – 25 –

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Aprile and M

    F. Aprile and M. Santagata,Two particle spectrum of tensor multiplets coupled to AdS3×S3 gravity, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 126022 [2104.00036]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gromov and G

    N. Gromov and G. Sizov,Exact Slope and Interpolating Functions in N=6 Supersymmetric Chern-Simons Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 121601 [1403.1894]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Beccaria, F

    M. Beccaria, F. Levkovich-Maslyuk, G. Macorini and A. A. Tseytlin,Quantum corrections to spinning superstrings inAdS3 × S3 × M 4: determining the dressing phase, JHEP 04 (2013) 006 [1211.6090]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Beccaria and G

    M. Beccaria and G. Macorini,Quantum corrections to short folded superstring in AdS3 × S3 × M 4, JHEP 03 (2013) 040 [1212.5672]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Roiban and A

    R. Roiban and A. A. Tseytlin,Semiclassical string computation of strong-coupling corrections to dimensions of operators in Konishi multiplet, Nucl. Phys. B 848 (2011) 251 [1102.1209]

    2011 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Aprile and P

    F. Aprile and P. Vieira,Large p explorations. From SUGRA to big STRINGS in Mellin space, JHEP 12 (2020) 206 [2007.09176]

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Wen and S.-Q

    C. Wen and S.-Q. Zhang,Notes on gravity multiplet correlators in AdS3 × S3, JHEP 07 (2021) 125 [2106.03499]

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Gromov, A

    N. Gromov, A. Hegedus, J. Julius and N. Sokolova,Fast QSC solver: tool for systematic study of N = 4 Super-Yang-Mills spectrum, JHEP 05 (2024) 185 [2306.12379]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Sfondrini,Towards integrability forAdS3/CFT2, J

    A. Sfondrini,Towards integrability forAdS3/CFT2, J. Phys. A48 (2015) 023001 [1406.2971]

    2015 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Demulder, S

    S. Demulder, S. Driezen, B. Knighton, G. Oling, A. L. Retore, F. K. Seibold et al.,Exact approaches on the string worldsheet, J. Phys. A57 (2024) 423001 [2312.12930]

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    F. K. Seibold and A. Sfondrini,AdS3 Integrability, Tensionless Limits, and Deformations: A Review, 2408.08414

  29. [37]

    Cavaglià, N

    A. Cavaglià, N. Gromov, B. Stefański, Jr., Jr. and A. Torrielli,Quantum Spectral Curve for AdS3/CFT2: a proposal, JHEP 12 (2021) 048 [2109.05500]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Ekhammar and D

    S. Ekhammar and D. Volin,Monodromy bootstrap for SU(2|2) quantum spectral curves: from Hubbard model to AdS3/CFT2, JHEP 03 (2022) 192 [2109.06164]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Ekhammar, N

    S. Ekhammar, N. Gromov and B. Stefański,Demystifying the Massless Sector in AdS_3 Quantum Spectral Curve, 2412.11915

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Julius and N

    J. Julius and N. Sokolova,Conformal field theory-data analysis forN = 4 Super-Yang-Mills at strong coupling, JHEP 03 (2024) 090 [2310.06041]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Julius and N

    J. Julius and N. S. Sokolova,Unmixing sub-leading Regge trajectories ofN = 4 Super-Yang-Mills, JHEP 04 (2025) 200 [2409.07529]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    M. Cho, S. Collier and X. Yin,Strings in Ramond-Ramond Backgrounds from the Neveu-Schwarz-Ramond Formalism, JHEP 12 (2020) 123 [1811.00032]

    2020 arXiv

  35. [43]

    M. Cho, J. Gomide, J. Scheinpflug and X. Yin,On the AdS5 × S5 Solution of Superstring Field Theory, 2507.12921

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    A. B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives, math/0103059

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    A. B. Goncharov,Multiple polylogarithms, cyclotomy and modular complexes, Math. Res. Lett. 5 (1998) 497 [1105.2076]. – 26 –

    1998 arXiv

  38. [46]

    F. C. S. Brown,Polylogarithmes multiples uniformes en une variable, Compt. Rend. Math. 338 (2004) 527

    2004

  39. [47]

    Duhr and F

    C. Duhr and F. Dulat,PolyLogTools — polylogs for the masses, JHEP 08 (2019) 135 [1904.07279]

    2019 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Maitre,HPL, a mathematica implementation of the harmonic polylogarithms, Comput

    D. Maitre,HPL, a mathematica implementation of the harmonic polylogarithms, Comput. Phys. Commun. 174 (2006) 222 [hep-ph/0507152]

    2006 arXiv

  41. [49]

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn,Conformal Partial Waves: Further Mathematical Results, 1108.6194

    arXiv

  42. [50]

    Mack,D-independent representation of Conformal Field Theories in D dimensions via transformation to auxiliary Dual Resonance Models

    G. Mack,D-independent representation of Conformal Field Theories in D dimensions via transformation to auxiliary Dual Resonance Models. Scalar amplitudes, 0907.2407

    arXiv

  43. [51]

    P. Dey, K. Ghosh and A. Sinha,Simplifying large spin bootstrap in Mellin space, JHEP 01 (2018) 152 [1709.06110]. – 27 –

    2018 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.