Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

DiTalker: A Unified DiT-based Framework for High-Quality and Speaking Styles Controllable Portrait Animation

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read DiTalker claims that a single diffusion-transformer generator can drive expressive talking faces, replacing the separate reference network used by current dual-network systems while keeping lip synchronization and speaking-style control.

desk verdict A genuinely useful single-DiT portrait animation architecture with a real efficiency win, but the lip-sync evidence is undercut by using the same retrained SyncNet for both the training loss and the evaluation oracle. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06511 v1 pith:V57Q5J4P submitted 2025-07-29 cs.CV

He Feng , Yongjia Ma , Donglin Di , Lei Fan , Tonghua Su , Xiangqian Wu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords portraitanimationtalkingheadgenerationdiffusiontransformerspeakingstylecontrollipsynchronizationaudio-drivenvideoposeemotion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to show that portrait animation does not need the now-standard dual-network design, in which one network copies the reference face and another denoises the video. DiTalker instead uses one diffusion-transformer (DiT) generator plus two lightweight conditioning modules: a Style-Emotion Encoding Module that separates identity-specific speaking style (head pose, eye and mouth movement) from identity-agnostic emotion, and an Audio-Style Fusion Module that feeds audio and style into the DiT through two parallel cross-attention layers. The authors argue that this design decouples "what is said" from "how it is said," so lip synchronization and style control can be trained together without a Reference Net. If correct, the payoff is a roughly tenfold reduction in inference cost, about 40 seconds versus 427 seconds for a 64-frame video, with visual quality that remains competitive with the best dual-network baselines.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the pair of new modules, SEEM and ASFM, attached to a single DiT generator. SEEM disentangles style from emotion: its style branch encodes 3DMM coefficients and phoneme labels into a style embedding, and its emotion branch encodes a text emotion label plus the reference face into an emotion embedding, so head pose and expression can be controlled independently. ASFM sits inside each DiT block and injects audio and style through two parallel cross-attention layers; their outputs are scaled by learned factors and summed before the block continues, letting the network balance lip synchronization against speaking style. A third emotion cross-attention layer adds the global emotion cue. The same mechanism also includes a pose adapter that adds facial keypoints into the latent, and two latent-space losses that replace the reference net's job of preserving identity and background.

What would settle it

Run an independent lip-sync evaluation (a public off-the-shelf lip-sync scorer, or a forced-choice human study) on the same HDTF, CelebV-HQ, and Mix Emotion clips generated by DiTalker and the baselines; DiTalker's central claim fails if it no longer matches Hallo2 and Hallo3 on Sync-C and Sync-D while retaining the roughly 40-second inference advantage.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a single DiT backbone, fine-tuned from a general image-to-video model, is enough for high-quality speaking-style-controllable portrait animation when audio and style are injected as separate cross-attention streams. Style comes from 3DMM face parameters plus phoneme labels, which capture identity-specific head motion and mouth shape; emotion comes from a text label describing the expression, combined with a reference-face encoding. Two modified losses recover what the reference network used to provide: a latent-space identity loss aligns the DiT's hidden states with a self-supervised visual encoder so identity and background are preserved, and a latent-space lip-sync loss decodes coarse frames and scores the mouth region with a lip-sync network. Across HDTF, CelebV-HQ, and a Chinese "Mix Emotion" test set, the paper reports image/video quality and lip synchronization competitive with the leading U-Net and DiT baselines, while using a fraction of the parameters and inference time. The intended message is that the reference network is an architectural crutch, not a necessity.

Load-bearing premise

The lip-sync scores rest on a lip-sync scorer the authors retrained on their own Chinese dataset; if that scorer is not language-neutral and method-neutral across the English and Chinese test sets, the reported Sync-C and Sync-D comparisons across baselines may not be valid.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On the reported numbers, a single-DiT pipeline cuts inference for a 64-frame video from 427 seconds (Hallo3) and 100 seconds (Hallo2) to about 40 seconds, with 1.95B parameters versus 19.52B, so the Reference Net may become an unnecessary cost in production systems.
  • Lip synchronization and speaking style can be optimised together rather than sequentially, because the audio and style cross-attention streams are trained jointly from the start.
  • The modified latent lip-sync loss is presented as a plug-in: other portrait animation methods can adopt it without changing their own generation backbone.
  • The identity loss closes the identity and background gap left by removing the reference net, which is what makes the single-backbone design feasible.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If this cost finding transfers to longer videos and higher resolutions, dual-branch architectures in adjacent image-to-video animation tasks may face the same replacement argument.
  • Because style and emotion are explicitly separated, a natural next step is style control from free-text descriptions or from a user-supplied style video beyond the seven fixed emotion labels.
  • The paper's reliance on a dataset-specific retrained lip-sync scorer means cross-language comparisons should be re-run with an independent, language-neutral scorer before the lip-sync advantage is taken as settled.
  • The staged fine-tuning recipe (general video model first, then condition modules) suggests a lightweight adaptation path for other pretrained video transformers, worth testing against training from scratch.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes DiTalker, a portrait-animation framework built on a single Diffusion Transformer (DiT) backbone, aiming to generate talking-head videos with accurate lip synchronization and controllable speaking style from a reference image, driving audio, and optional style frames. The main architectural contributions are a Style-Emotion Encoding Module (SEEM) with separate style and emotion branches, and an Audio-Style Fusion Module (ASFM) with two parallel cross-attention layers that inject audio and style embeddings into the DiT blocks. The authors also adopt a Latent Space Identity Loss and modify a Latent Space Lip Sync Loss. They report quantitative results on HDTF, CelebV-HQ, and a newly constructed Mix Emotion test set, claiming competitive image/video quality, strong lip-sync metrics, superior style controllability, and large computational savings compared with dual U-Net baselines.

Significance. If the quantitative claims hold, DiTalker makes a useful architectural contribution: it demonstrates that a single DiT without a separate Reference Net can match or exceed dual U-Net systems on generation quality and style control while reducing inference time by an order of magnitude (40s vs. 427s for a 64-frame video in Table II). The paper also provides extensive ablations of the added modules and losses, and it reports efficiency numbers that are rarely given in portrait-animation papers. However, the reliability of the central lip-synchronization and style-controllability claims depends on resolving evaluation-protocol issues described in the major comments; once those are addressed, the work could become a practical reference point for efficient style-controllable talking-head generation.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section V-A and Eq. (11)] The authors state that they retrained a SyncNet on the DH-FaceVid-1K dataset for computing Lsync and for 'subsequent quantitative experiments.' This same retrained network is used both as the oracle in the Latent Space Lip Sync Loss during training and to compute Sync-C/Sync-D in Tables I, III, and IV. None of the baseline methods had access to this oracle during training, so if the retrained SyncNet exploits dataset-specific or language-specific cues, the reported lip-sync comparisons are biased in DiTalker's favor. The manuscript does not specify whether the HDTF and CelebV-HQ numbers in Table I use the retrained or the original SyncNet, nor does it report the retrained network's architecture, training/validation split, or identity overlap with the training and test sets. Please report results with both the original and retrained SyncNet, describe the retrained oracle in sufficient detail, and show per-language Sync-C/Sync-D scores to demonstrate language neutrality.
  2. [Section V-D and Table VI] The loss weights (λid=0.1, λs=0.5, λsync=0.1, λeye=10) are selected by evaluating FID, FVD, LPIPS, and AKD on the Mix Emotion test set, which is the same set used to report the main style-controllability results in Table IV. This constitutes test-set tuning, because the selected weights are then locked in for the reported comparison on that same set. This procedure can inflate the model's measured advantage over baselines on Mix Emotion. Please either use a separate validation split for hyperparameter selection or demonstrate that the chosen weights are stable across a range on multiple held-out test sets.
  3. [Section V-A, Test Set Preparation] The Mix Emotion test set is constructed from DH-FaceVid-1K and DH-FaceEmoVid-150, both of which are also used for training. The paper only states that the test set is 'non-overlapping' without clarifying whether the non-overlap is at the clip level or the identity level. If the same identities appear in both training and test, the style-control metrics (AKD, F-LMD) and the visual-quality metrics on Mix Emotion would be optimistic. Please define the non-overlap criterion explicitly (e.g., identity-disjoint) and describe how the 6:1:1:1:1:1:1 emotion split was derived and verified.
  4. [Tables I–IV and Section V-B] No error bars, confidence intervals, or significance tests are reported for any of the quantitative comparisons. For several metrics, the differences between DiTalker and the strongest baseline (e.g., Hallo3 on HDTF FID: 13.03 vs. 12.18; HDTF Sync-C: 3.823 vs. 3.445) are not obviously beyond run-to-run variation, especially given that the same test samples are used. Please provide standard deviations over multiple runs or a paired bootstrap test for the main comparisons, so the claimed 'best or second-best' status is statistically grounded.
  5. [Table II] The inference-time and parameter comparison lacks a measurement protocol. The paper reports 40s vs. 427s for a 64-frame video and frames-per-second numbers, but does not specify the hardware, sampling steps, batch size, resolution, or whether the time includes VAE decoding. Without a precise protocol, the claimed 10.7x speedup is difficult to verify or reproduce. Please detail the measurement setup and, ideally, report latency under matched sampling steps and resolution for all methods.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section IV-B, Eq. (9)] The text says 'we randomly sample one frame of hidden states from the first d layers,' but the variable d is not defined; it should refer to db, the depth of the DiT, or be introduced explicitly.
  2. [Section IV-C, Eq. (7)] The variable L is used both for the fused audio feature dimension (L=50) and as the symbol for a loss (Lsync, Lid), which is confusing. Please choose distinct notation, and clarify how a 10-frame context window (4 preceding, current, and 5 following frames) yields L=50.
  3. [Table V] The first row of the ablation table appears to show checkmarks for ASFM, Lid, and Lsync while reporting the worst FID/FVD/AKD; this is inconsistent with the surrounding text. Please ensure the row ordering and checkmark placement unambiguously indicate the configuration being ablated.
  4. [Section V-A and Supplementary Materials] The paper repeatedly refers to supplementary materials for filtering rules, phoneme extraction details, and other implementation choices, but the supplementary file is not available with the arXiv submission. Please make the supplementary material accessible and ensure it contains these promised details.
  5. [General] The conclusion largely repeats the abstract and does not mention any limitations, notably the dependence of the lip-sync evaluation on a retrained oracle. A brief limitations paragraph would improve the paper's scientific completeness.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Lip-sync evaluation is partly self-referential: the retrained SyncNet used as the Lsync training loss (Eq. 11) is also the oracle for the reported Sync-C/Sync-D scores.

  1. self definitional [Section V-A (Implementation Details) and Section IV-D, Eq. (11)]
    "we observed that the pre-trained SyncNet did not perform accurately when evaluating audio in languages such as Chinese (e.g., values of Sync-C and Sync-D). To address this, we adopted [66] and retrained a SyncNet using the DH-FaceVid-1K dataset for computing Lsync and subsequent quantitative experiments."

    Eq. (11) defines Lsync with the term λs · SyncNet(D(xθ0), cd), and Eq. (13) adds λsyncLsync to the total loss. The paper then uses the same retrained SyncNet for 'subsequent quantitative experiments,' i.e., the Sync-C/Sync-D scores in the comparison tables. DiTalker is therefore trained to minimize the exact function later reported as an independent lip-sync metric, while baselines were not trained with this oracle. The oracle is also retrained on the authors' own DH-FaceVid-1K dataset, so the metric is partly self-defined. FID/FVD/LPIPS and AKD/F-LMD remain independent, so the circularity is partial.

full rationale

No other load-bearing circularity was found. The architecture contributions (SEEM, ASFM, Pose Adapter, and Lid) are evaluated with external metrics and ablations, and the efficiency comparison in Table II is a direct measurement. The one materially self-referential element is the lip-sync evidence: the retrained SyncNet is both the supervision signal in Lsync (Eq. 11, combined in Eq. 13) and the oracle for the reported Sync-C/Sync-D scores. The paper states this reuse explicitly, so the lip-sync evaluation is not fully independent. However, the claimed performance is not forced by construction because held-out videos and external HDTF/CelebV-HQ sets are still used, and the visual-quality and style metrics provide independent support. This warrants a moderate circularity score rather than a high one.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical systems paper, so the identified assumptions are measurement, transfer, and representation assumptions rather than formal mathematical axioms. The main hidden costs are the hand-tuned loss weights and the retrained SyncNet, both of which the central performance claim depends on.

free parameters (8)
  • wp = 0.1
    Controls influence of the DWPose keypoint prior added to the latent in Eq. 3; chosen by hand.
  • lambda_eye = 10
    Eye-mask reconstruction loss weight in Eq. 12; selected via ablation and reported in Table VI.
  • lambda_id = 0.1
    DINOv2 identity loss weight in Eq. 13; selected on the Mix Emotion test set through the ablations in Table VI.
  • lambda_sync = 0.1
    Latent lip sync loss weight in Eq. 13; selected on the Mix Emotion test set through the ablations in Table VI.
  • lambda_s = 0.5
    L2 weighting inside the lip sync loss in Eq. 11; chosen by hand among the values tested in Table VI.
  • ls = 2
    Number of sampled latent frames for the lip sync loss in Eq. 11; chosen by hand.
  • Lf = 5
    Number of continuous frames fed to SyncNet in Eq. 11; chosen by hand.
  • audio context window = 4 preceding and 5 following frames, L=50
    Temporal context concatenation for audio features in Eq. 7; manually set.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The retrained SyncNet is a valid proxy for lip synchronization on both English and Chinese audio.
    Used for the Lip Sync Loss (Eq. 11) and for evaluation (Tables I, III, IV), but the SyncNet was retrained on the authors' own dataset.
  • domain assumption 3DMM parameters and DWPose keypoints extracted from style frames reliably encode identity-specific speaking style.
    The style branch (Eqs. 4 and 5) and the Pose Adapter (Eq. 3) rely on these representations without independent validation in the paper.
  • domain assumption DINOv2 cosine similarity between DiT hidden states and DINOv2 features preserves identity and background details.
    The Latent Space Identity Loss (Eq. 9) assumes this alignment transfers identity and background fidelity to the generated frames.
  • domain assumption EasyAnimate pretrained DiT weights transfer to talking-face generation after 10K fine-tuning iterations.
    The whole training pipeline in Section V-A starts from EasyAnimate I2V weights; if this transfer fails, the architecture does not train.
  • domain assumption AKD and F-LMD are valid measurements of speaking-style controllability and naturalness of head movements.
    These landmark-based metrics support the style-control claim in Tables IV to VII, but they do not directly measure perceived emotional expression.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of DiTalker: A Unified DiT-based Framework for High-Quality and Speaking Styles Controllable Portrait Animation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V57Q5J4P

@misc{pith2026250806511,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: DiTalker: A Unified DiT-based Framework for High-Quality and Speaking Styles Controllable Portrait Animation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V57Q5J4P}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06511}
}
read the original abstract

Portrait animation aims to synthesize talking videos from a static reference face, conditioned on audio and style frame cues (e.g., emotion and head poses), while ensuring precise lip synchronization and faithful reproduction of speaking styles. Existing diffusion-based portrait animation methods primarily focus on lip synchronization or static emotion transformation, often overlooking dynamic styles such as head movements. Moreover, most of these methods rely on a dual U-Net architecture, which preserves identity consistency but incurs additional computational overhead. To this end, we propose DiTalker, a unified DiT-based framework for speaking style-controllable portrait animation. We design a Style-Emotion Encoding Module that employs two separate branches: a style branch extracting identity-specific style information (e.g., head poses and movements), and an emotion branch extracting identity-agnostic emotion features. We further introduce an Audio-Style Fusion Module that decouples audio and speaking styles via two parallel cross-attention layers, using these features to guide the animation process. To enhance the quality of results, we adopt and modify two optimization constraints: one to improve lip synchronization and the other to preserve fine-grained identity and background details. Extensive experiments demonstrate the superiority of DiTalker in terms of lip synchronization and speaking style controllability. Project Page: https://thenameishope.github.io/DiTalker/

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.06511 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Given a reference face, driving audio, and a specific speaking style, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparison of our DiTalker with three categories of portrait animation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Overview of our proposed DiTalker. It consists of a DiT generation backbone, a Style-Emotion Encoding Module (SEEM), and an Audio-Style Fusion Module (ASFM). SEEM takes style frames Vs and phonemes (extracted from the driving audio a) as inputs, extracting style features cs and emotion features cemo. ASFM uses cs and ca (extracted by the Audio Encoder) as inputs into the DiT backbone through two attention layers, wh… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The computation process of the Latent Space Lip Sync Loss, which [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative comparison on HDTF and CelebV-HQ test sets. DiTalker outperforms baseline methods in visual fidelity, particularly in challenging [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diverse results generated by DiTalker, including different emotions, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: After EasyAnimate experienced training collapse, the generated video [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LaCache: Exact Caching and Precision-Adaptive Inference for Diffusion Large Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A training-free caching and per-group FP8 quantization framework reports ~1.3× standalone and up to 40.2× combined speedups for diffusion LLM inference while keeping benchmark accuracy roughly stable.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Spatio- temporal energy-guided diffusion model for zero-shot video synthesis and editing,

    L. Yang, Y . Zhao, Z. Yu, B. Zeng, M. Xu, S. Hong, and B. Cui, “Spatio- temporal energy-guided diffusion model for zero-shot video synthesis and editing,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 6034–6046, 2025. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 11

    work page 2025

  2. [2]

    Tvg: A training-free transition video generation method with diffusion models,

    R. Zhang, Y . Chen, Y . Liu, W. Wang, X. Wen, and H. Wang, “Tvg: A training-free transition video generation method with diffusion models,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets,

    A. Blattmann, T. Dockhorn, S. Kulal, D. Mendelevitch, M. Kilian, D. Lorenz, Y . Levi, Z. English, V . V oleti, A. Lettset al. , “Stable video diffusion: Scaling latent video diffusion models to large datasets,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.15127, 2023

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Corrtalk: Correlation between hierarchical speech and facial activity variances for 3d animation,

    Z. Chu, K. Guo, X. Xing, Y . Lan, B. Cai, and X. Xu, “Corrtalk: Correlation between hierarchical speech and facial activity variances for 3d animation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 8953–8965, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Wonderjourney: Going from anywhere to everywhere,

    H.-X. Yu, H. Duan, J. Hur, K. Sargent, M. Rubinstein, W. T. Freeman, F. Cole, D. Sun, N. Snavely, J. Wu et al., “Wonderjourney: Going from anywhere to everywhere,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 6658–6667

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Omnihuman-1: Rethinking the scaling-up of one-stage conditioned human animation models,

    G. Lin, J. Jiang, J. Yang, Z. Zheng, and C. Liang, “Omnihuman-1: Rethinking the scaling-up of one-stage conditioned human animation models,” in CVPR, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Audio-semantic enhanced pose-driven talking head generation,

    M. Liu, D. Li, Y . Li, X. Song, and L. Nie, “Audio-semantic enhanced pose-driven talking head generation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 11 056–11 069, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Alleviating one- to-many mapping in talking head synthesis with dynamic adaptation context and style adapter,

    Z. Chu, K. Guo, X. Xing, B. Cai, S. He, and X. Xu, “Alleviating one- to-many mapping in talking head synthesis with dynamic adaptation context and style adapter,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

Show all 71 references
  1. [9]

    Stochastic latent talking face generation toward emotional expressions and head poses,

    Z. Sheng, L. Nie, M. Zhang, X. Chang, and Y . Yan, “Stochastic latent talking face generation toward emotional expressions and head poses,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 2734–2748, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    Hallo2: Long-duration and high-resolution audio-driven portrait image animation,

    J. Cui, H. Li, Y . Yao, H. Zhu, H. Shang, K. Cheng, H. Zhou, S. Zhu, and J. Wang, “Hallo2: Long-duration and high-resolution audio-driven portrait image animation,” in ICLR, 2025

    2025

  3. [11]

    Out of time: automated lip sync in the wild,

    J. S. Chung and A. Zisserman, “Out of time: automated lip sync in the wild,” in ACCV. Springer, 2017, pp. 251–263

    2017

  4. [12]

    Styletalk++: A unified framework for controlling the speaking styles of talking heads,

    S. Wang, Y . Ma, Y . Ding, Z. Hu, C. Fan, T. Lv, Z. Deng, and X. Yu, “Styletalk++: A unified framework for controlling the speaking styles of talking heads,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 4331–4347, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Multimodal inputs driven talking face generation with spatial–temporal dependency,

    L. Yu, J. Yu, M. Li, and Q. Ling, “Multimodal inputs driven talking face generation with spatial–temporal dependency,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 203– 216, 2021

    2021

  6. [14]

    A lip sync expert is all you need for speech to lip generation in the wild,

    K. Prajwal, R. Mukhopadhyay, V . P. Namboodiri, and C. Jawahar, “A lip sync expert is all you need for speech to lip generation in the wild,” in ACM MM, 2020, pp. 484–492

    2020

  7. [15]

    Difftalk: Crafting diffusion models for generalized audio-driven portraits anima- tion,

    S. Shen, W. Zhao, Z. Meng, W. Li, Z. Zhu, J. Zhou, and J. Lu, “Difftalk: Crafting diffusion models for generalized audio-driven portraits anima- tion,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 1982–1991

    2023

  8. [16]

    Instructavatar: Text-guided emotion and motion control for avatar generation,

    Y . Wang, J. Guo, J. Bai, R. Yu, T. He, X. Tan, X. Sun, and J. Bian, “Instructavatar: Text-guided emotion and motion control for avatar generation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.15758 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Moee: Mixture of emotion experts for audio-driven portrait animation,

    H. Liu, W. Sun, D. Di, S. Sun, J. Yang, C. Zou, and H. Bao, “Moee: Mixture of emotion experts for audio-driven portrait animation,” CVPR, 2025

    2025

  10. [18]

    Face recognition based on fitting a 3d mor- phable model,

    V . Blanz and T. Vetter, “Face recognition based on fitting a 3d mor- phable model,” IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1063–1074, 2003

    2003

  11. [19]

    Echomimic: Lifelike audio-driven portrait animations through editable landmark conditioning,

    Z. C. Zhiyuan Chen, Jiajiong Cao, Y . Li, and C. Ma, “Echomimic: Lifelike audio-driven portrait animations through editable landmark conditioning,” in AAAI, 2025

    2025

  12. [20]

    Hallo3: Highly dynamic and realistic portrait image animation with diffusion transformer networks,

    J. Cui, H. Li, Y . Zhan, H. Shang, K. Cheng, Y . Ma, S. Mu, H. Zhou, J. Wang, and S. Zhu, “Hallo3: Highly dynamic and realistic portrait image animation with diffusion transformer networks,” in CVPR, 2025

    2025

  13. [21]

    Styletalk: One-shot talking head generation with controllable speaking styles,

    Y . Ma, S. Wang, Z. Hu, C. Fan, T. Lv, Y . Ding, Z. Deng, and X. Yu, “Styletalk: One-shot talking head generation with controllable speaking styles,” in AAAI, vol. 37, no. 2, 2023, pp. 1896–1904

    2023

  14. [22]

    Style2talker: High-resolution talking head generation with emotion style and art style,

    S. Tan, B. Ji, and Y . Pan, “Style2talker: High-resolution talking head generation with emotion style and art style,” in AAAI, vol. 38, no. 5, 2024, pp. 5079–5087

    2024

  15. [23]

    Edtalk: Efficient disentanglement for emotional talking head synthesis,

    S. Tan, B. Ji, M. Bi, and Y . Pan, “Edtalk: Efficient disentanglement for emotional talking head synthesis,” in ECCV. Springer, 2025, pp. 398–416

    2025

  16. [24]

    Say anything with any style,

    S. Tan, B. Ji, Y . Ding, and Y . Pan, “Say anything with any style,” in AAAI, vol. 38, no. 5, 2024, pp. 5088–5096

    2024

  17. [25]

    Emo: Emote portrait alive generating expressive portrait videos with audio2video diffusion model under weak conditions,

    L. Tian, Q. Wang, B. Zhang, and L. Bo, “Emo: Emote portrait alive generating expressive portrait videos with audio2video diffusion model under weak conditions,” in ECCV. Springer, 2025, pp. 244–260

    2025

  18. [26]

    Sadtalker: Learning realistic 3d motion coefficients for stylized audio-driven single image talking face animation,

    W. Zhang, X. Cun, X. Wang, Y . Zhang, X. Shen, Y . Guo, Y . Shan, and F. Wang, “Sadtalker: Learning realistic 3d motion coefficients for stylized audio-driven single image talking face animation,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 8652–8661

    2023

  19. [27]

    Real3d-portrait: One-shot realistic 3d talking portrait synthesis,

    Z. Ye, T. Zhong, Y . Ren, J. Yang, W. Li, J. Huang, Z. Jiang, J. He, R. Huang, J. Liu et al. , “Real3d-portrait: One-shot realistic 3d talking portrait synthesis,” in ICLR, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Scalable diffusion models with transformers,

    W. Peebles and S. Xie, “Scalable diffusion models with transformers,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 4195–4205

    2023

  21. [29]

    Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer,

    Z. Yang, J. Teng, W. Zheng, M. Ding, S. Huang, J. Xu, Y . Yang, W. Hong, X. Zhang, G. Feng et al., “Cogvideox: Text-to-video diffusion models with an expert transformer,” in ICLR, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,

    C. Raffel, N. Shazeer, A. Roberts, K. Lee, S. Narang, M. Matena, Y . Zhou, W. Li, and P. J. Liu, “Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer,” Journal of machine learning research, vol. 21, no. 140, pp. 1–67, 2020

    2020

  23. [31]

    Efficient emotional adaptation for audio-driven talking-head generation,

    Y . Gan, Z. Yang, X. Yue, L. Sun, and Y . Yang, “Efficient emotional adaptation for audio-driven talking-head generation,” in ICCV, October 2023, pp. 22 634–22 645

    2023

  24. [32]

    Talkclip: Talking head generation with text-guided expressive speaking styles,

    Y . Ma, S. Wang, Y . Ding, B. Ma, T. Lv, C. Fan, Z. Hu, Z. Deng, and X. Yu, “Talkclip: Talking head generation with text-guided expressive speaking styles,” IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , pp. 1–12, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    Whisperx: Time-accurate speech transcription of long-form audio,

    M. Bain, J. Huh, T. Han, and A. Zisserman, “Whisperx: Time-accurate speech transcription of long-form audio,” INTERSPEECH, 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Aniportrait: Audio-driven synthesis of photorealistic portrait animation,

    H. Wei, Z. Yang, and Z. Wang, “Aniportrait: Audio-driven synthesis of photorealistic portrait animation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.17694 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Hallo: Hierarchical audio-driven visual synthesis for portrait image animation,

    M. Xu, H. Li, Q. Su, H. Shang, L. Zhang, C. Liu, J. Wang, L. Van Gool, Y . Yao, and S. Zhu, “Hallo: Hierarchical audio-driven visual synthesis for portrait image animation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.08801 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Rep- resentation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think,

    S. Yu, S. Kwak, H. Jang, J. Jeong, J. Huang, J. Shin, and S. Xie, “Rep- resentation alignment for generation: Training diffusion transformers is easier than you think,” in ICLR, 2025

    2025

  29. [37]

    Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision,

    M. Oquab, T. Darcet, T. Moutakanni, H. V . V o, M. Szafraniec, V . Khali- dov, P. Fernandez, D. HAZIZA, F. Massa, A. El-Nouby et al., “Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision,” Transactions on Machine Learning Research , 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Flow-guided one-shot talking face generation with a high-resolution audio-visual dataset,

    Z. Zhang, L. Li, Y . Ding, and C. Fan, “Flow-guided one-shot talking face generation with a high-resolution audio-visual dataset,” in CVPR, 2021, pp. 3661–3670

    2021

  31. [39]

    CelebV-HQ: A large-scale video facial attributes dataset,

    H. Zhu, W. Wu, W. Zhu, L. Jiang, S. Tang, L. Zhang, Z. Liu, and C. C. Loy, “CelebV-HQ: A large-scale video facial attributes dataset,” in ECCV, 2022

    2022

  32. [40]

    Hierarchical feature warping and blending for talking head animation,

    J. Zhang, C. Liu, K. Xian, and Z. Cao, “Hierarchical feature warping and blending for talking head animation,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 7301–7314, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,

    J. Ho, A. Jain, and P. Abbeel, “Denoising diffusion probabilistic models,” NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851, 2020

    2020

  34. [42]

    Diffused heads: Diffusion models beat gans on talking-face generation,

    M. Stypulkowski, K. V ougioukas, S. He, M. Zieba, S. Petridis, and M. Pantic, “Diffused heads: Diffusion models beat gans on talking-face generation,” in WACV, 2024, pp. 5091–5100

    2024

  35. [43]

    Loopy: Taming audio-driven portrait avatar with long-term motion dependency,

    J. Jiang, C. Liang, J. Yang, G. Lin, T. Zhong, and Y . Zheng, “Loopy: Taming audio-driven portrait avatar with long-term motion dependency,” ICLR, 2025

    2025

  36. [44]

    wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations,

    A. Baevski, Y . Zhou, A. Mohamed, and M. Auli, “wav2vec 2.0: A framework for self-supervised learning of speech representations,” NeurIPS, vol. 33, pp. 12 449–12 460, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Efficient emotional adaptation for audio-driven talking-head generation,

    Y . Gan, Z. Yang, X. Yue, L. Sun, and Y . Yang, “Efficient emotional adaptation for audio-driven talking-head generation,” in ICCV, 2023, pp. 22 634–22 645

    2023

  38. [46]

    Emmn: Emotional motion memory network for audio-driven emotional talking face generation,

    S. Tan, B. Ji, and Y . Pan, “Emmn: Emotional motion memory network for audio-driven emotional talking face generation,” in ICCV, 2023, pp. 22 146–22 156

    2023

  39. [47]

    Talking face gener- ation with audio-deduced emotional landmarks,

    S. Zhai, M. Liu, Y . Li, Z. Gao, L. Zhu, and L. Nie, “Talking face gener- ation with audio-deduced emotional landmarks,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 2023

    2023

  40. [48]

    Eamm: One-shot emotional talking face via audio-based emotion-aware motion model,

    X. Ji, H. Zhou, K. Wang, Q. Wu, W. Wu, F. Xu, and X. Cao, “Eamm: One-shot emotional talking face via audio-based emotion-aware motion model,” in ACM SIGGRAPH, 2022, pp. 1–10

    2022

  41. [49]

    Neural discrete representation learning,

    A. Van Den Oord, O. Vinyals et al. , “Neural discrete representation learning,” NeurIPS, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  42. [50]

    Progressive disentangled representation learning for fine-grained controllable talking head synthesis,

    D. Wang, Y . Deng, Z. Yin, H.-Y . Shum, and B. Wang, “Progressive disentangled representation learning for fine-grained controllable talking head synthesis,” in CVPR, 2023

    2023

  43. [51]

    Pllava: Parameter-free llava extension from images to videos for video dense captioning,

    L. Xu, Y . Zhao, D. Zhou, Z. Lin, S. K. Ng, and J. Feng, “Pllava: Parameter-free llava extension from images to videos for video dense captioning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.16994 , 2024. JOURNAL OF LATEX CLASS FILES, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2021 12

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation,

    L. Hu, “Animate anyone: Consistent and controllable image-to-video synthesis for character animation,” in CVPR, 2024, pp. 8153–8163

    2024

  45. [53]

    Megactor- σ: Unlocking flexible mixed-modal control in portrait animation with diffusion transformer,

    S. Yang, H. Li, J. Wu, M. Jing, L. Li, R. Ji, J. Liang, H. Fan, and J. Wang, “Megactor- σ: Unlocking flexible mixed-modal control in portrait animation with diffusion transformer,” in AAAI, 2025

    2025

  46. [54]

    Vasa-1: Lifelike audio-driven talking faces generated in real time,

    S. Xu, G. Chen, Y .-X. Guo, J. Yang, C. Li, Z. Zang, Y . Zhang, X. Tong, and B. Guo, “Vasa-1: Lifelike audio-driven talking faces generated in real time,” NeurIPS, vol. 37, pp. 660–684, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,

    R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, “High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,” in CVPR, 2022, pp. 10 684–10 695

    2022

  48. [56]

    Easyanimate: A high-performance long video gen- eration method based on transformer architecture,

    J. Xu, X. Zou, K. Huang, Y . Chen, B. Liu, M. Cheng, X. Shi, and J. Huang, “Easyanimate: A high-performance long video gen- eration method based on transformer architecture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.18991, 2024

    2024

  49. [57]

    Sora: A review on background, technology, limitations, and opportunities of large vision models,

    Y . Liu, K. Zhang, Y . Li, Z. Yan, C. Gao, R. Chen, Z. Yuan, Y . Huang, H. Sun, J. Gao et al. , “Sora: A review on background, technology, limitations, and opportunities of large vision models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.17177, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,

    A. Dosovitskiy, L. Beyer, A. Kolesnikov, D. Weissenborn, X. Zhai, T. Unterthiner, M. Dehghani, M. Minderer, G. Heigold, S. Gelly et al. , “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” in ICLR, 2020

    2020

  51. [59]

    Effective whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distillation,

    Z. Yang, A. Zeng, C. Yuan, and Y . Li, “Effective whole-body pose estimation with two-stages distillation,” in ICCV, 2023, pp. 4210–4220

    2023

  52. [60]

    Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video generation with style adapter,

    G. Liu, M. Xia, Y . Zhang, H. Chen, J. Xing, X. Wang, Y . Yang, and Y . Shan, “Stylecrafter: Enhancing stylized text-to-video generation with style adapter,” TOG, 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,

    A. Radford, J. W. Kim, C. Hallacy, A. Ramesh, G. Goh, S. Agarwal, G. Sastry, A. Askell, P. Mishkin, J. Clark et al. , “Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,” in ICML, 2021, pp. 8748–8763

    2021

  54. [62]

    Vision transformer with quad- rangle attention,

    Q. Zhang, J. Zhang, Y . Xu, and D. Tao, “Vision transformer with quad- rangle attention,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 3608–3624, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    Celebv-text: A large-scale facial text-video dataset,

    J. Yu, H. Zhu, L. Jiang, C. C. Loy, W. Cai, and W. Wu, “Celebv-text: A large-scale facial text-video dataset,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 14 805–14 814

    2023

  56. [64]

    Facevid-1k: A large-scale high-quality multiracial human face video dataset,

    D. Di, H. Feng, W. Sun, Y . Ma, H. Li, W. Chen, X. Gou, T. Su, and X. Yang, “Facevid-1k: A large-scale high-quality multiracial human face video dataset,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.07151 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Mead: A large-scale audio-visual dataset for emotional talking-face generation,

    K. Wang, Q. Wu, L. Song, Z. Yang, W. Wu, C. Qian, R. He, Y . Qiao, and C. C. Loy, “Mead: A large-scale audio-visual dataset for emotional talking-face generation,” in ECCV. Springer, 2020, pp. 700–717

    2020

  58. [66]

    Latentsync: Taming audio-conditioned latent diffusion models for lip sync with syncnet supervision,

    C. Li, C. Zhang, W. Xu, J. Lin, J. Xie, W. Feng, B. Peng, C. Chen, and W. Xing, “Latentsync: Taming audio-conditioned latent diffusion models for lip sync with syncnet supervision,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09262, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium,

    M. Heusel, H. Ramsauer, T. Unterthiner, B. Nessler, and S. Hochreiter, “Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilibrium,” NeurIPS, vol. 30, 2017

    2017

  60. [68]

    Video-to-video synthesis,

    T.-C. Wang, M.-Y . Liu, J.-Y . Zhu, G. Liu, A. Tao, J. Kautz, and B. Catanzaro, “Video-to-video synthesis,” in NeurIPS, 2018, pp. 1152– 1164

    2018

  61. [69]

    Ani- mating arbitrary objects via deep motion transfer,

    A. Siarohin, S. Lathuili `ere, S. Tulyakov, E. Ricci, and N. Sebe, “Ani- mating arbitrary objects via deep motion transfer,” in CVPR, 2019, pp. 2377–2386

    2019

  62. [70]

    Seeing what you said: Talking face generation guided by a lip reading expert,

    J. Wang, X. Qian, M. Zhang, R. T. Tan, and H. Li, “Seeing what you said: Talking face generation guided by a lip reading expert,” in CVPR, 2023, pp. 14 653–14 662

    2023

  63. [71]

    Towards robust blind face restoration with codebook lookup transformer,

    S. Zhou, K. C. Chan, C. Li, and C. C. Loy, “Towards robust blind face restoration with codebook lookup transformer,” in NeurIPS, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.