Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 75 references

Inter-role reciprocity in evolutionary trust game on square lattices

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that a checkerboard square lattice with same-role learning is enough for trust to evolve in a trust game, as long as the trustees' return ratio is moderate.

desk verdict The checkerboard role-separation trick is a genuinely tidy idea and the moderate-return claim is plausible, but the unreadable full text means the simulation details—and the claimed mechanism—can't be checked. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.06685 v1 pith:NTZA7CT3 submitted 2025-08-08 physics.soc-ph cs.GTnlin.CG

Chaoqian Wang , Wei Zhang , Xinwei Wang , Attila Szolnoki This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.soc-phcs.GTnlin.CG
keywords trustgameevolutionarytheoryspatialreciprocitybipartitegamessquarelatticecheckerboardcooperationreturnratio
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Simulating a trust game in a single population is awkward because trustors and trustees play different roles. The paper's proposal is to place the two roles on alternating square-lattice sites, so interactions run across roles while strategy learning runs only along same-role diagonal sub-lattices. On this setup, simulations show that a moderate trustee return ratio lets investing trustors and trustworthy trustees form inter-role clusters, preserving trust; too high a return hurts trustees, too low a return hurts trustors. The same checkerboard construction is offered as a general simulation framework for any bipartite game.

What carries the argument

The checkerboard bipartite square lattice: alternating trustor and trustee sites creates two disjoint diagonal sub-lattices. Learning is confined to same-role diagonal neighbours, while payoffs are collected from cross-role neighbours. This geometry keeps role identity fixed while allowing spatial contact between roles, and it is what lets cooperative trustor and trustee strategies reinforce each other in inter-role clusters.

What would settle it

Run the same trust game on the checkerboard lattice but allow cross-role imitation or role switching; if the moderate-return band of trust survival disappears, the proposed inter-role reciprocity is an artifact of restricting learning to same-role diagonals. A second check is to measure trustee survival at high return ratios and test whether their extinction is what ends trust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On an even-sized square lattice, alternating trustor and trustee roles creates two disjoint diagonal sub-lattices. Strategy learning happens only along the same-role diagonal, while game interactions take place between neighbouring sites of opposite roles on the original lattice. The paper reports that with this structure, a moderate return ratio supports a phase where investing trustors and trustworthy trustees form inter-role clusters, so trust survives. This inter-role spatial reciprocity means each role's cooperative behaviour protects its cross-role cooperative partner, and the resulting clusters resist invasion by defectors. If the return ratio is too high, trustees lose too much payof

Load-bearing premise

The result assumes players are frozen in their role and can only imitate same-role neighbours along the diagonal sub-lattice; if role switching or cross-role imitation is allowed, the moderate-return trust phase could vanish.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Trust can survive in a one-population spatial model without reputation, punishment, or partner choice, provided trustees return a moderate share of what they receive.
  • The checkerboard construction gives a general simulation template for asymmetric two-role games: roles fixed by geometry, interactions cross-role, learning within-role.
  • The return ratio has two failure thresholds: too low kills trust because investing trustors cannot afford to invest, and too high kills trust because trustees are selected out by their own generosity.
  • In the surviving phase, the population self-organizes into inter-role clusters, so spatial reciprocity operates across roles rather than only within a single strategy-sharing population.
  • Any bipartite game can be studied with the same minimal spatial structure, potentially revealing analogous inter-role spatial mechanisms beyond the trust game.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same mechanism should appear in other asymmetric interactions, such as lender-borrower or sender-receiver games, wherever one role's payoff increases and the other's decreases with the transferred amount; scanning that transfer parameter on this lattice would test the mechanism's generality.
  • Editorial inference: because the mechanism depends on frozen role identity and diagonal same-role learning, it may be fragile under role-switching or cross-role imitation; testing those variants would show how much of the effect is topology rather than strategy dynamics.
  • Editorial inference: in institutional terms, the result suggests a narrow window of restitution rates; setting returns too high can destroy the trustee population, a less obvious failure mode than the usual story of trustors refusing to invest.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a spatial simulation scheme for the two-role trust game. Alternating trustors and trustees on a square lattice creates two diagonal sub-lattices; strategy imitation occurs within same-role sub-lattices, while payoffs are collected through cross-role interactions. Based on unspecified simulations, the authors report an inter-role spatial reciprocity mechanism: at a moderate trustee return ratio, investing trustors and trustworthy trustees aggregate in clusters and trust survives; too high a return ratio harms trustees, too low harms trustors. They further claim the framework extends to any bipartite game. The full text of the submitted file is not readable; the only clear text is the abstract and an arXiv header for a different paper.

Significance. If the result holds, the paper would provide a minimal spatial mechanism for trust without reputation or punishment, and a general lattice construction for bipartite games. The checkerboard bipartition is an elegant idea, and the qualitative prediction is concrete and falsifiable. Credit is due for the conceptual construction. However, the manuscript as submitted provides no numerical evidence, no model equations, no simulation parameters, and no code. The central claim is therefore currently unverified; the reported phenomenology cannot be assessed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Full text (body after abstract)] The body is a corrupted encoding; the only readable fragment is an arXiv header for 2508.06681v2 [math.OC], which does not match this manuscript's identifier (2508.06685, physics.soc-ph). No model definition, payoff function, update rule, or simulation protocol is recoverable. Since every claim in the abstract rests on the simulation setup, this prevents verification of the central claim. The manuscript must be resubmitted with a readable and correctly associated full text.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract reports no quantitative information: lattice size, boundary conditions, update rule (synchronous/asynchronous, selection intensity), initial strategy fractions, number of independent runs, transient length, or measured observables. Without these, the claims 'moderate return ratio allows ... trust to emerge' and 'too high ... harms trustees; too low ... harms trustors' are not reproducible or falsifiable.
  3. [Abstract, phase claims] The claimed distinction between 'moderate', 'too high', and 'too low' return ratios is presented without phase boundaries, error bars, or finite-size analysis. The reader cannot tell whether these are stable asymptotic statements or transient artifacts. The authors should state the measured quantities, their uncertainties, and robustness checks across lattice sizes and random seeds.
  4. [Proposed framework, role separation] Because roles are fixed and learning is confined to same-role diagonal sub-lattices, cross-role interactions are guaranteed by construction. The manuscript does not report control experiments (e.g., random role assignment, role switching, alternative lattices, or allowing cross-role learning) that would distinguish an emergent inter-role reciprocity mechanism from a topological artifact. The term 'mechanism' needs an operational definition in terms of cluster statistics or conditional payoffs.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Header/full text] The embedded arXiv identifier '2508.06681v2 [math.OC] 21 Aug 2025' does not match the manuscript's arXiv number. This must be corrected.
  2. [Abstract, terminology] The term 'return ratio' is not formally defined. Is it the fraction of the investment returned by the trustee, or a multiplier? This should be stated in the model section.
  3. [Abstract, lattice] The phrase 'even lattice sizes' needs boundary conditions and a statement of whether periodic boundaries are used; otherwise finite-size effects are uncontrolled.
  4. [Figures] The figures are not readable in the submitted encoding. Axis labels, legends, and captions must be legible before the simulation results can be evaluated.
  5. [References] The reference list appears as a list of unformatted topics rather than complete bibliographic entries. Proper references are needed, especially for prior spatial trust-game and bipartite-game simulation methods.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified; simulation outcomes are not fitted inputs or self-referential derivations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a simulation-based result: alternating trustors and trustees on a square lattice creates disjoint diagonal sub-lattices for same-role learning, and simulations show that a moderate return ratio allows investing trustors and trustworthy trustees to form inter-role clusters and sustain trust. Nothing in the readable abstract indicates that any predicted quantity is defined in terms of another predicted quantity, that a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, or that a load-bearing assumption is justified only by a self-citation. The role-separation geometry is indeed imposed by construction, but the reported outcomes—trust survival, cluster formation, and non-monotonic dependence on the return ratio—are emergent simulation findings rather than consequences of the setup by definition. The full text supplied is corrupted and largely unreadable, so equations and simulation details cannot be checked, but unverifiability is a correctness risk, not evidence of circularity. No specific reduction of a claim to its own inputs can be quoted, so the honest finding is no significant circularity (score 0).

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small set of standard trust game parameters (return ratio, payoff scaling) plus three modeling choices: fixed role assignment with same-role-only imitation, a linear payoff structure, and the square lattice as the representative spatial topology. None of these are fitted constants, but all are load-bearing: a different learning rule (for example, cross-role imitation without role fixing) could plausibly remove the reported trust phase entirely. No invented entities are introduced; 'inter-role spatial reciprocity' names an emergent simulation pattern, not a postulated thing.

free parameters (2)
  • return ratio r
    Standard trust game control parameter, scanned in simulations rather than fitted; the claimed phase structure (moderate return stabilizes trust) is a function of this input, but the paper does not tune it to a target outcome.
  • investment endowment / payoff scaling
    The trust game requires a payoff scale relating the invested amount, its multiplication, and the trustee's returned share; this is a standard model input from the trust game literature, not a number fitted to the paper's result.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Role assignment is fixed by the checkerboard: trustors only interact with trustees, and strategy imitation is confined to the same-role diagonal sub-lattice.
    This is the paper's proposed simulation framework (abstract), and every reported outcome, including inter-role cluster formation, is an outcome of this learning topology rather than a general result about trust games.
  • domain assumption The trust game payoff structure is linear in the return ratio, with high returns directly reducing trustee fitness.
    The abstract's claim that 'too high a return harms the survival of trustees' presupposes that trustee payoffs decrease monotonically with the returned share.
  • domain assumption The square lattice with even size provides a minimal spatial structure, with no further heterogeneity, environmental noise, or role switching.
    The generality claim ('applicable to any bipartite game') rests on the assumption that this topology is representative and minimal, which is asserted in the abstract but not evidenced there.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Inter-role reciprocity in evolutionary trust game on square lattices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NTZA7CT3

@misc{pith2026250806685,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Inter-role reciprocity in evolutionary trust game on square lattices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NTZA7CT3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.06685}
}
read the original abstract

Simulating bipartite games, such as the trust game, is not straightforward due to the lack of a natural way to distinguish roles in a single population. The square lattice topology can provide a simple yet elegant solution by alternating trustors and trustees. For even lattice sizes, it creates two disjoint diagonal sub-lattices for strategy learning, while game interactions can take place on the original lattice. This setup ensures a minimal spatial structure that allows interactions across roles and learning within roles. By simulations on this setup, we detect an inter-role spatial reciprocity mechanism, through which trust can emerge. In particular, a moderate return ratio allows investing trustors and trustworthy trustees to form inter-role clusters and thus save trust. If the return is too high, it harms the survival of trustees; if too low, it harms trustors. The proposed simulation framework is also applicable to any bipartite game to uncover potential inter-role spatial mechanisms across various scenarios.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aapmrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  2. [2]

    merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipauth4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translat...

    2010

  3. [3]

    merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs aipnum4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  4. [4]

    merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrev4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  5. [5]

    merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked

    FUNCTION id.bst "merlin.mbs apsrmp4-1.bst 2010-07-25 4.21a (PWD, AO, DPC) hacked" ENTRY address archive archivePrefix author bookaddress booktitle chapter collaboration doi edition editor eid eprint howpublished institution isbn issn journal key language month note number organization pages primaryClass publisher school SLACcitation series title translati...

    2010

  6. [6]

    author author W. D. \ Hamilton ,\ title title The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II , \ 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 journal journal Journal of Theoretical Biology \ volume 7 ,\ pages 17--52 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 1964

  7. [7]

    Axelrod \ and\ author W

    author author R. Axelrod \ and\ author W. D. \ Hamilton ,\ title title The evolution of cooperation , \ 10.1126/science.7466396 journal journal Science \ volume 211 ,\ pages 1390--1396 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1126/science.7466396 1981

  8. [8]

    author author D. C. \ Krakauer \ and\ author M. Pagel ,\ title title Spatial structure and the evolution of honest cost-free signalling , \ 10.1098/rspb.1995.0106 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B \ volume 260 ,\ pages 365--372 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 1995

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Takahashi , author H

    author author H. Takahashi , author H. Takano , author C. F. \ Camerer , author T. Ideno , author S. Okubo , author H. Matsui , author Y. Tamari , author K. Takemura , author R. Arakawa , author F. Kodaka , et al. ,\ title title Honesty mediates the relationship between seroto...

    2012 doi

  2. [10]

    Kumar , author S

    author author A. Kumar , author S. Chowdhary , author V. Capraro , \ and\ author M. Perc ,\ title title Evolution of honesty in higher-order social networks , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.104.054308 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 104 ,\ pages 054308 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  3. [11]

    Boehm ,\ @noop title Moral Origins \ ( publisher Basic Books ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    author author C. Boehm ,\ @noop title Moral Origins \ ( publisher Basic Books ,\ year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012

  4. [12]

    Helbing , author A

    author author D. Helbing , author A. Szolnoki , author M. Perc , \ and\ author G. Szab \'o ,\ title title Evolutionary establishment of moral and double moral standards through spatial interactions , \ 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000758 journal journal PLoS Computational Biology \ v...

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    Abbass , author G

    author author H. Abbass , author G. Greenwood , \ and\ author E. Petraki ,\ title title The N -player trust game and its replicator dynamics , \ 10.1109/TEVC.2015.2484840 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation \ volume 20 ,\ pages 470--474 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  6. [14]

    Chica , author R

    author author M. Chica , author R. Chiong , author M. Kirley , \ and\ author H. Ishibuchi ,\ title title A networked N -player trust game and its evolutionary dynamics , \ 10.1109/TEVC.2017.2769081 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation \ volume 22 ,\ pa...

    2017

  7. [15]

    Kumar , author V

    author author A. Kumar , author V. Capraro , \ and\ author M. Perc ,\ title title The evolution of trust and trustworthiness , \ 10.1098/rsif.2020.0491 journal journal Journal of the Royal Society Interface \ volume 17 ,\ pages 20200491 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  8. [16]

    author author M. A. \ Nowak \ and\ author R. M. \ May ,\ title title Evolutionary games and spatial chaos , \ 10.1038/359826a0 journal journal Nature \ volume 359 ,\ pages 826--829 ( year 1992 ) NoStop

    1992 doi

  9. [17]

    Allen , author G

    author author B. Allen , author G. Lippner , author Y.-T. \ Chen , author B. Fotouhi , author N. Momeni , author S.-T. \ Yau , \ and\ author M. A. \ Nowak ,\ title title Evolutionary dynamics on any population structure , \ 10.1038/nature21723 journal journal Nature \ volume 5...

    2017 doi

  10. [18]

    Perc , author J

    author author M. Perc , author J. J. \ Jordan , author D. G. \ Rand , author Z. Wang , author S. Boccaletti , \ and\ author A. Szolnoki ,\ title title Statistical physics of human cooperation , \ 10.1016/j.physrep.2017.05.004 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 687 ,\ pag...

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    Szab \'o \ and\ author C

    author author G. Szab \'o \ and\ author C. T o ke ,\ title title Evolutionary prisoner’s dilemma game on a square lattice , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.69 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 58 ,\ pages 69 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    1998 doi

  12. [20]

    Perc \ and\ author A

    author author M. Perc \ and\ author A. Szolnoki ,\ title title Coevolutionary games---a mini review , \ 10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.10.003 journal journal BioSystems \ volume 99 ,\ pages 109--125 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  13. [21]

    Ohtsuki , author C

    author author H. Ohtsuki , author C. Hauert , author E. Lieberman , \ and\ author M. A. \ Nowak ,\ title title A simple rule for the evolution of cooperation on graphs and social networks , \ 10.1038/nature04605 journal journal Nature \ volume 441 ,\ pages 502--505 ( year 2006...

    2006 doi

  14. [22]

    Szab \'o \ and\ author G

    author author G. Szab \'o \ and\ author G. Fath ,\ title title Evolutionary games on graphs , \ 10.1016/j.physrep.2007.04.004 journal journal Physics Reports \ volume 446 ,\ pages 97--216 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  15. [23]

    Wang , author M

    author author C. Wang , author M. Perc , \ and\ author A. Szolnoki ,\ title title Evolutionary dynamics of any multiplayer game on regular graphs , \ 10.1038/s41467-024-49505-5 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 15 ,\ pages 5349 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    Berg , author J

    author author J. Berg , author J. Dickhaut , \ and\ author K. McCabe ,\ title title Trust, reciprocity, and social history , \ 10.1006/game.1995.1027 journal journal Games and Economic Behavior \ volume 10 ,\ pages 122--142 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995

  17. [25]

    author author J. C. \ Cox ,\ title title How to identify trust and reciprocity , \ 10.1016/S0899-8256(03)00119-2 journal journal Games and Economic Behavior \ volume 46 ,\ pages 260--281 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  18. [26]

    author author N. D. \ Johnson \ and\ author A. A. \ Mislin ,\ title title Trust games: A meta-analysis , \ 10.1016/j.joep.2011.05.007 journal journal Journal of Economic Psychology \ volume 32 ,\ pages 865--889 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  19. [27]

    author author C. F. \ Camerer ,\ @noop title Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction \ ( publisher Princeton University Press ,\ year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  20. [28]

    Greenwood , author H

    author author G. Greenwood , author H. Abbass , \ and\ author E. Petraki ,\ title title Finite population trust game replicators , \ in\ 10.1007/978-3-319-28270-1_27 booktitle Australasian Conference on Artificial Life and Computational Intelligence ,\ Vol.\ volume 9592 \ ( or...

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    author author C. Wang ,\ title title Evolution of trust in structured populations , \ 10.1016/j.amc.2024.128595 journal journal Applied Mathematics and Computation \ volume 471 ,\ pages 128595 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  22. [30]

    Guo , author L

    author author R. Guo , author L. Liu , author Y. Liu , \ and\ author L. Zhang ,\ title title Evolution of trust in the N -player trust game with the margin system , \ 10.1016/j.amc.2024.128649 journal journal Applied Mathematics and Computation \ volume 473 ,\ pages 128649 ( y...

    2024

  23. [31]

    Liu , author L

    author author Y. Liu , author L. Wang , author R. Guo , author S. Hua , author L. Liu , \ and\ author L. Zhang ,\ title title Evolution of trust in N -player trust games with loss assessment , \ 10.1063/5.0228886 journal journal Chaos \ volume 34 ( year 2024 ),\ 10.1063/5.0228...

    2024 doi

  24. [32]

    Chica , author R

    author author M. Chica , author R. Chiong , author J. J. \ Ramasco , \ and\ author H. Abbass ,\ title title Effects of update rules on networked N -player trust game dynamics , \ 10.1016/j.cnsns.2019.104870 journal journal Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simu...

    2019

  25. [33]

    Towers , author B

    author author I. Towers , author B. O’Neill , author H. Sidhu , author Z. Jovanoski , author K. Merrick , \ and\ author M. Barlow ,\ title title An N -player trust game: comparison of replicator and logit dynamics , \ in\ @noop booktitle Proceedings of the 22nd International C...

    2017

  26. [34]

    Liu \ and\ author X

    author author L. Liu \ and\ author X. Chen ,\ title title Conditional investment strategy in evolutionary trust games with repeated group interactions , \ 10.1016/j.ins.2022.07.073 journal journal Information Sciences \ volume 609 ,\ pages 1694--1705 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    Shang , author T

    author author L. Shang , author T. Zhang , \ and\ author M. Chang ,\ title title Evolutionary dynamics in networked trust games with diverse investment patterns , \ 10.1209/0295-5075/acb16f journal journal EPL \ volume 141 ,\ pages 22002 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Hu , author X

    author author Z. Hu , author X. Li , author J. Wang , author C. Xia , author Z. Wang , \ and\ author M. Perc ,\ title title Adaptive reputation promotes trust in social networks , \ 10.1109/TNSE.2021.3103771 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering ...

    2021

  29. [37]

    Li , author M

    author author X. Li , author M. Feng , author W. Han , \ and\ author C. Xia ,\ title title N -player trust game with second-order reputation evaluation in the networked population , \ 10.1109/JSYST.2022.3212771 journal journal IEEE Systems Journal \ volume 7 ,\ pages 2982--299...

    2022

  30. [38]

    Xia , author Z

    author author C. Xia , author Z. Hu , \ and\ author D. Zhao ,\ title title Costly reputation building still promotes the collective trust within the networked population , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/ac8898 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 24 ,\ pages 083041 ( year 2022...

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    Feng , author X

    author author M. Feng , author X. Li , author D. Zhao , \ and\ author C. Xia ,\ title title Evolutionary dynamics with the second-order reputation in the networked N -player trust game , \ 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114042 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 175 ,\ p...

    2023

  32. [40]

    Chica , author R

    author author M. Chica , author R. Chiong , author M. T. \ Adam , \ and\ author T. Teubner ,\ title title An evolutionary game model with punishment and protection to promote trust in the sharing economy , \ 10.1038/s41598-019-55384-4 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volum...

    2019 doi

  33. [41]

    Fang \ and\ author X

    author author X. Fang \ and\ author X. Chen ,\ title title Evolutionary dynamics of trust in the N -player trust game with individual reward and punishment , \ 10.1140/epjb/s10051-021-00185-w journal journal The European Physical Journal B \ volume 94 ,\ pages 176 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021 doi

  34. [42]

    Sun , author Y

    author author K. Sun , author Y. Liu , author X. Chen , \ and\ author A. Szolnoki ,\ title title Evolution of trust in a hierarchical population with punishing investors , \ 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.112413 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 162 ,\ pages 112413 ( y...

    2022

  35. [43]

    Liu , author J

    author author Z. Liu , author J. Wang , \ and\ author X. Li ,\ title title Evolutionary dynamics of networked N -player trust games with exclusion strategy , \ 10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115214 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 186 ,\ pages 115214 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  36. [44]

    Liu , author L

    author author Y. Liu , author L. Wang , author R. Guo , author S. Hua , author L. Liu , author L. Zhang , \ and\ author T. A. \ Han ,\ title title Evolution of trust in the N -player trust game with transformation incentive mechanism , \ 10.1098/rsif.2024.0726 journal journal ...

    2024

  37. [45]

    Wang , author Z

    author author J. Wang , author Z. Liu , author Y. Xu , \ and\ author X. Li ,\ title title Dynamic evolution in multi-player networked trust games with graded punishment , \ 10.1063/5.0256342 journal journal Chaos \ volume 35 ( year 2025 ),\ 10.1063/5.0256342 NoStop

    2025 doi

  38. [46]

    author author S. V. \ Burks , author J. P. \ Carpenter , \ and\ author E. Verhoogen ,\ title title Playing both roles in the trust game , \ 10.1016/S0167-2681(02)00093-8 journal journal Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization \ volume 51 ,\ pages 195--216 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  39. [47]

    author author I. S. \ Lim \ and\ author V. Capraro ,\ title title A synergy of institutional incentives and networked structures in evolutionary game dynamics of multiagent systems , \ 10.1109/TCSII.2021.3133711 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Exp...

    2021

  40. [48]

    author author I. S. \ Lim \ and\ author N. Masuda ,\ title title To be a truster or not to be: Evolutionary dynamics of a symmetric N -player trust game in well-mixed and networked populations , \ 10.48550/arXiv.2411.14845 journal journal arXiv Preprint \ ( year 2024 ),\ 10.48...

    2024 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Wang , author L

    author author Z. Wang , author L. Wang , author A. Szolnoki , \ and\ author M. Perc ,\ title title Evolutionary games on multilayer networks: a colloquium , \ 10.1140/epjb/e2015-60270-7 journal journal The European Physical Journal B \ volume 88 ,\ pages 124 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    Lugo \ and\ author M

    author author H. Lugo \ and\ author M. S. \ Miguel ,\ title title Learning and coordinating in a multilayer network , \ 10.1038/srep07776 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 5 ,\ pages 7776 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  43. [51]

    Hauert \ and\ author G

    author author C. Hauert \ and\ author G. Szab \'o ,\ title title Phase transitions and symmetry breaking of cooperation on lattices , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.111.054308 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 111 ,\ pages 054308 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    2025 doi

  44. [52]

    Masuda \ and\ author M

    author author N. Masuda \ and\ author M. Nakamura ,\ title title Coevolution of trustful buyers and cooperative sellers in the trust game , \ 10.1371/journal.pone.0044169 journal journal PLoS One \ volume 7 ,\ pages e44169 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    2012 doi

  45. [53]

    author author C. E. \ Tarnita ,\ title title Fairness and trust in structured populations , \ 10.3390/g6030214 journal journal Games \ volume 6 ,\ pages 214--230 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  46. [54]

    author author I. S. \ Lim ,\ title title Stochastic evolutionary dynamics of trust games with asymmetric parameters , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.062419 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 102 ,\ pages 062419 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  47. [55]

    author author I. S. \ Lim \ and\ author N. Masuda ,\ title title To trust or not to trust: evolutionary dynamics of an asymmetric N -player trust game , \ 10.1109/TEVC.2023.3244537 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation \ volume 28 ,\ pages 117--131 ( ye...

    2023

  48. [56]

    Chiong , author S

    author author R. Chiong , author S. Dhakal , author T. Chaston , \ and\ author M. Chica ,\ title title Evolution of trust in the sharing economy with fixed provider and consumer roles under different host network structures , \ 10.1016/j.knosys.2021.107496 journal journal Know...

    2021

  49. [57]

    Liu , author L

    author author Y. Liu , author L. Liu , author R. Guo , \ and\ author L. Zhang ,\ title title N -player repeated evolutionary trust game under government management , \ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114031 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 175 ,\ pages ...

    2023

  50. [58]

    Guo , author L

    author author R. Guo , author L. Liu , author Y. Liu , \ and\ author L. Zhang ,\ title title Evolution of trust in a hierarchical population with different investors based on investment behavioral theory , \ 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.114078 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractal...

    2023

  51. [59]

    Zhou , author Y

    author author C. Zhou , author Y. Zhu , author C. Xia , \ and\ author M. Chica ,\ title title Evolutionary dynamics of trust in hierarchical populations with varying investment strategies , \ 10.1098/rsif.2024.0734 journal journal Journal of the Royal Society Interface \ volum...

    2024

  52. [60]

    Su , author R

    author author X. Su , author R. Guo , author S. Hua , author L. Liu , \ and\ author L. Zhang ,\ title title Time delay effects on evolutionary dynamics of N -player trust game with diverse investment behaviors , \ 10.1016/j.amc.2024.129177 journal journal Applied Mathematics a...

    2024

  53. [61]

    Szolnoki , author G

    author author A. Szolnoki , author G. Szab \'o , \ and\ author M. Perc ,\ title title Phase diagrams for the spatial public goods game with pool punishment , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.83.036101 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 83 ,\ pages 036101 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  54. [62]

    Szolnoki \ and\ author X

    author author A. Szolnoki \ and\ author X. Chen ,\ title title Competition and partnership between conformity and payoff-based , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/aade3c journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 2018 ,\ pages 093008 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    author author J. T. \ Cox \ and\ author D. Griffeath ,\ title title Occupation time limit theorems for the voter model , \ 10.1214/aop/1176993438 journal journal The Annals of Probability \ volume 11 ,\ pages 876--893 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  56. [64]

    Perc , author A

    author author M. Perc , author A. Szolnoki , \ and\ author G. Szab \'o ,\ title title Restricted connections among distinguished players support cooperation , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.066101 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 78 ,\ pages 066101 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  57. [65]

    Szolnoki \ and\ author M

    author author A. Szolnoki \ and\ author M. Perc ,\ title title Promoting cooperation in social dilemmas via simple coevolutionary rules , \ 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00470-8 journal journal The European Physical Journal B \ volume 67 ,\ pages 337--344 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  58. [66]

    Szolnoki \ and\ author M

    author author A. Szolnoki \ and\ author M. Perc ,\ title title Information sharing promotes prosocial behaviour , \ 10.1088/1367-2630/15/5/053010 journal journal New Journal of Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 053010 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  59. [67]

    Wang \ and\ author C

    author author C. Wang \ and\ author C. Sun ,\ title title Public goods game across multilayer populations with different densities , \ 10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113154 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 168 ,\ pages 113154 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  60. [68]

    Hauert \ and\ author G

    author author C. Hauert \ and\ author G. Szab \'o ,\ title title Spontaneous symmetry breaking of cooperation between species , \ 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae326 journal journal PNAS Nexus \ volume 3 ,\ pages pgae326 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Ling , author Z

    author author T. Ling , author Z. Li , author M. Feng , \ and\ author A. Szolnoki ,\ title title Supervised cooperation on interdependent public goods games , \ 10.1016/j.amc.2024.129249 journal journal Applied Mathematics and Computation \ volume 492 ,\ pages 129249 ( year 20...

    2024

  62. [70]

    G \"u th , author R

    author author W. G \"u th , author R. Schmittberger , \ and\ author B. Schwarze ,\ title title An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining , \ 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7 journal journal Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization \ volume 3 ,\ pages 367--388 ( year 1982...

    1982 doi

  63. [71]

    author author K. M. \ Page , author M. A. \ Nowak , \ and\ author K. Sigmund ,\ title title The spatial ultimatum game , \ 10.1098/rspb.2000.1266 journal journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B \ volume 267 ,\ pages 2177--2182 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

  64. [72]

    von Stackelberg ,\ @noop title Marktform und Gleichgewicht \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 1934 ) NoStop

    author author H. von Stackelberg ,\ @noop title Marktform und Gleichgewicht \ ( publisher Springer ,\ year 1934 ) NoStop

    1934

  65. [73]

    Perc \ and\ author A

    author author M. Perc \ and\ author A. Szolnoki ,\ title title Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game , \ 10.1103/PhysRevE.77.011904 journal journal Physical Review E \ volume 77 ,\ pages 011904 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  66. [74]

    Wang \ and\ author A

    author author C. Wang \ and\ author A. Szolnoki ,\ title title Involution game with spatio-temporal heterogeneity of social resources , \ 10.1016/j.amc.2022.127307 journal journal Applied Mathematics and Computation \ volume 430 ,\ pages 127307 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  67. [75]

    author author P. D. \ Taylor \ and\ author L. B. \ Jonker ,\ title title Evolutionary stable strategies and game dynamics , \ 10.1016/0025-5564(78)90077-9 journal journal Mathematical Biosciences \ volume 40 ,\ pages 145--156 ( year 1978 ) NoStop

    1978 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.