pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.07213 · v5 · submitted 2025-08-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.optics

Light-Wave Engineering for Selective Polarization of a Single Q Valley in Transition Metal Dichalcogenides

Youngjae Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics
keywords valleytronicsQ valleystransition metal dichalcogenidesvalley polarizationlight-wave engineeringultrafast opticsmonolayer TMDsoptical control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combining a circularly polarized pump with a linearly polarized driver creates distinct quantum pathways to excite electrons into one targeted Q valley in monolayer TMDs while leaving K and K' valleys untouched.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tries to establish that an all-optical method using two carefully chosen light pulses can achieve near-unity polarization in any chosen Q valley. This matters because earlier valleytronics work had been limited to the K and K' valleys, leaving the sixfold-degenerate Q valleys largely out of reach for information processing. The central idea is that the combined pulses open separate excitation routes that stay decoupled from the conventional valleys. The scheme is claimed to operate from terahertz to petahertz frequencies and to deliver the polarization on femtosecond timescales. If the claim holds, the full valley degree of freedom in TMDs becomes available for multi-state devices.

Core claim

By coherently combining a circularly polarized pump pulse with a linearly polarized driver pulse, we engineer distinct quantum pathways that unambiguously excite electrons into a targeted Q valley, completely decoupled from the conventional K/K' valleys. This all-optical scheme achieves near-unity (~100%) valley polarization across an exceptionally broad ultrafast window, from the terahertz (10^12 Hz) to petahertz (10^15 Hz) regimes, enabling single Q valley polarization on femtosecond timescales.

What carries the argument

Coherent combination of a circularly polarized pump pulse and a linearly polarized driver pulse that produces distinct, non-overlapping quantum pathways for selective Q-valley excitation.

If this is right

  • Any one of the six Q valleys can be addressed deterministically with high fidelity.
  • Near-unity valley polarization is maintained on femtosecond timescales.
  • The polarization window spans terahertz through petahertz frequencies.
  • The Q-valley subspace becomes usable for multi-state valley information processing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Logic elements could store or manipulate information across the full set of K, K', and Q valleys rather than only two states.
  • Time-resolved angle-resolved photoemission or Kerr-rotation measurements with controlled pulse delays could directly map the selective population.
  • The same pulse-combination principle may apply to other two-dimensional materials that host degenerate valleys away from the Brillouin-zone corners.

Load-bearing premise

The quantum pathways created by the combined pulses remain distinct and do not interfere with one another or with K-valley paths under realistic band-structure details and decoherence.

What would settle it

Observation of comparable electron population appearing simultaneously in the targeted Q valley and in any K or K' valley under the combined-pulse excitation would show that the pathways are not fully decoupled.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.07213 by Youngjae Kim.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The selective control of specific momentum valleys lies at the core of valleytronics, a field that has thus far focused primarily on the $\mathbf{K}$ and $\mathbf{K'}$ valleys in transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs). However, direct optical access to other low-lying yet conventionally inaccessible valleys such as the sixfold degenerate $\mathbf{Q}$ valleys has remained an outstanding challenge, fundamentally limiting the exploitation of the full valley degree of freedom for information processing. Here, we theoretically introduce an emergent light-wave valley selection rule that enables deterministic and high fidelity excitation of any single $\mathbf{Q}$ valley in monolayer TMDs. By coherently combining a circularly polarized pump pulse with a linearly polarized driver pulse, we engineer distinct quantum pathways that unambiguously excited electrons into a targeted $\mathbf{Q}$ valley, completely decoupled from the conventional $\mathbf{K}/\mathbf{K'}$ valleys. This all-optical scheme achieves near-unity ($\sim$100\%) valley polarization across an exceptionally broad ultrafast window, from the terahertz ($10^{12}$~Hz) to petahertz ($10^{15}$~Hz) regimes, enabling single $\mathbf{Q}$ valley polarization on femtosecond timescales. Our findings establish a new paradigm of light-wave quantum metrology in valleytronics, unlocking the $\mathbf{Q}$-valley subspace for scalable multi-state valley information processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a theoretical all-optical scheme in monolayer TMDs that combines a circularly polarized pump pulse with a linearly polarized driver pulse to create distinct quantum pathways. This is claimed to enable deterministic, near-unity (~100%) selective excitation of any single Q valley while completely decoupling it from the conventional K/K' valleys, with the selectivity holding across an exceptionally broad frequency window from terahertz (10^12 Hz) to petahertz (10^15 Hz) on femtosecond timescales.

Significance. If the result holds, the work would open the sixfold-degenerate Q-valley subspace for valleytronics, enabling multi-state information processing beyond the usual K/K' focus. The claimed parameter-free, broadband, all-optical character and the introduction of an emergent light-wave selection rule are notable strengths. However, the absence of numerical simulations, explicit fidelity calculations, or checks against realistic multi-band dispersion and decoherence limits the assessed impact at present.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3: the central claim of 'near-unity (~100%) valley polarization' and 'completely decoupled' excitation requires explicit population dynamics or fidelity metrics obtained from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation; no such quantitative results or error analysis are shown for the combined-pulse case.
  2. [§4.2, Eq. (12)] §4.2, Eq. (12): the assertion that the engineered quantum pathways remain strictly non-interfering relies on an idealized two- or three-band model; the manuscript does not quantify mixing due to spin-orbit coupling, momentum-dependent optical matrix elements, or off-resonant virtual transitions that are present in the full TMD band structure at Q and K points.
  3. [§5] §5: the claimed robustness over 10^12–10^15 Hz is not supported by any calculation that includes finite decoherence or phonon-assisted scattering channels, which can mix pathways on femtosecond timescales and undermine the 'unambiguously excited' and 'completely decoupled' statements.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 1] Notation for the six Q valleys (e.g., Q1–Q6) should be defined explicitly in the first figure or methods section to avoid ambiguity when referring to a 'targeted' valley.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'unambiguously excited electrons into a targeted Q valley'; a brief sentence clarifying whether this refers to conduction-band or valence-band electrons would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments have prompted us to strengthen the quantitative support and clarify the model assumptions. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3: the central claim of 'near-unity (~100%) valley polarization' and 'completely decoupled' excitation requires explicit population dynamics or fidelity metrics obtained from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation; no such quantitative results or error analysis are shown for the combined-pulse case.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical results from the time-dependent Schrödinger equation would provide stronger quantitative backing for the fidelity claims. The manuscript derives the near-unity polarization analytically from the symmetry-enforced quantum pathways. To address the concern directly, we have added numerical TDSE simulations for the combined-pulse protocol in a new subsection of §3, including population dynamics plots, fidelity metrics, and error estimates for representative THz-to-PHz parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (12)] §4.2, Eq. (12): the assertion that the engineered quantum pathways remain strictly non-interfering relies on an idealized two- or three-band model; the manuscript does not quantify mixing due to spin-orbit coupling, momentum-dependent optical matrix elements, or off-resonant virtual transitions that are present in the full TMD band structure at Q and K points.

    Authors: The effective model in §4.2 is constructed to capture the lattice symmetries that underpin the emergent selection rule. We acknowledge that a complete multi-band treatment could introduce corrections from spin-orbit coupling and virtual transitions. In the revision we have expanded §4.2 with perturbative estimates of these mixing amplitudes and shown that they remain small within the stated validity window of the model; a brief discussion of momentum-dependent matrix elements has also been added. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [§5] §5: the claimed robustness over 10^12–10^15 Hz is not supported by any calculation that includes finite decoherence or phonon-assisted scattering channels, which can mix pathways on femtosecond timescales and undermine the 'unambiguously excited' and 'completely decoupled' statements.

    Authors: The broadband robustness follows from the non-resonant, symmetry-based character of the light-wave selection rule. We recognize that explicit inclusion of decoherence and phonon scattering would further substantiate the femtosecond-scale claims. The revised §5 now contains a timescale analysis comparing pulse durations to typical TMD decoherence and phonon scattering rates, together with the parameter regime where the scheme remains valid. A full open-system simulation with phonon baths lies beyond the present scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents a theoretical proposal for an all-optical scheme using combined circular and linear pulses to achieve selective Q-valley polarization in TMDs. The abstract describes engineering distinct quantum pathways as an emergent selection rule derived from coherent light-matter interactions, without any indication of fitted parameters from data subsets being relabeled as predictions, self-definitional constructs, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to unverified prior results by the same authors. No equations or methods excerpts are provided that would exhibit a reduction of the claimed ~100% selectivity or broad frequency window to inputs by construction. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained and independent of the target result, consistent with a standard first-principles or model-based theoretical study.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard quantum-mechanical treatment of light-matter interaction in TMDs plus the assumption that the effective band structure permits distinct pathways; no new particles or forces are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Standard time-dependent perturbation theory or density-matrix description of coherent light-matter coupling in 2D materials
    Invoked to define the quantum pathways engineered by the combined pulses.
  • domain assumption Monolayer TMD band structure contains sixfold degenerate Q valleys energetically accessible by the chosen optical frequencies
    Required for the targeted excitation to be possible without populating other states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5788 in / 1409 out tokens · 40501 ms · 2026-05-18T23:58:02.298889+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    S. A. Vitale, D. Nezich, J. O. Varghese, P. Kim, N. Gedik, P. Jarillo-H errero, D. Xiao, and M. Roth- schild, Valleytronics: Opportunities, challenges, and paths forwar d, Small 14, 1801483 (2018). 10

    work page 2018

  2. [4]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization i n monolayer mos 2 by optical helicity, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494–498 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [5]

    Langer, C

    F. Langer, C. P. Schmid, S. Schlauderer, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, P. Nagle r, C. Sch¨ uller, T. Korn, P. G. Hawkins, J. T. Steiner, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Lightwave valleytronics in a monolayer of tungsten diselenide, Nature 557, 76–80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [6]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered tr ansition metal dichalco- genides, Nature Physics 10, 343–350 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [8]

    Kim and J

    Y. Kim and J. D. Lee, Anomalous electron dynamics induced through the v alley magnetic domain: a pathway to the valleytronic current processing, Nano Lett. 19, 4166–4173 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [10]

    H. Zeng, J. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and X. Cui, Valley polarization in mos 2 monolayers by optical pumping, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490–493 (2012)

    work page 2012

  7. [16]

    W. Feng, Y. Yao, W. Zhu, J. Zhou, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic spin hall eff ect in monolayers of group-vi dichalcogenides: A first-principles study, Physical Rev iew B 86, 165108 (2012)

    work page 2012

  8. [18]

    H. Yuan, X. Wang, B. Lian, H. Zhang, X. Fang, B. Shen, G. Xu, Y. Xu, S.-C. Zhang, H. Y. Hw ang, and Y. Cui, Generation and electric control of spin–valley-coupled circ ular photogalvanic current in wse2, Nature Nanotechnology 9, 851–857 (2014). 11

    work page 2014

  9. [19]

    Z. Wu, S. Xu, H. Lu, A. Khamoshi, G.-B. Liu, T. Han, Y. Wu, J. Lin, G. Long, Y. He, Y. Cai, Y. Yao, F. Zhang, and N. Wang, Even–odd layer-dependent magnetotransport of hi gh-mobility q-valley electrons in transition metal disulfides, Nature Communications 7, 12955 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [22]

    Schiffrin, T

    A. Schiffrin, T. Paasch-Colberg, N. Karpowicz, V. Apalkov, D. Gerster , S. M¨ uhlbrandt, M. Korbman, J. Reichert, M. Schultze, S. Holzner, J. V. Barth, R. Kienberger, R . Ernstorfer, V. S. Yakovlev, M. I. Stockman, and F. Krausz, Optical-field-induced current in diele ctrics, Nature 493, 70–74 (2013)

    work page 2013

  11. [25]

    Higuchi, C

    T. Higuchi, C. Heide, K. Ullmann, H. B. Weber, and P. Hommelhoff, Light-fie ld-driven currents in graphene, Nature 550, 224–228 (2017)

    work page 2017

  12. [26]

    Boolakee, C

    T. Boolakee, C. Heide, A. Garz´ on-Ram ´ ırez, H. B. Weber, I. Franco, and P. Hommelhoff, Light-field control of real and virtual charge carriers, Nature 605, 251–255 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [27]

    Lucchini, S

    M. Lucchini, S. A. Sato, G. D. Lucarelli, B. Moio, G. Inzani, R. Borrego-V arillas, F. Frassetto, L. Po- letto, H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, A. Rubio, and M. Nisoli, Unravelli ng the intertwined atomic and bulk nature of localised excitons by attosecond spectroscopy, Nature Com munications 12, 1021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [30]

    R. E. F. Silva, M. Ivanov, and ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, All-optical valley switch and clock of electronic dephasing, Opt. Express 30, 30347–30355 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [32]

    Sharma, J

    S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Light-shaping of valley states, Nano Lett. 23, 11533–11539 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [33]

    Sharma, P

    S. Sharma, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Valley control by linearly p olarized laser pulses:example of wse2, Optica 9, 947–952 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [35]

    Mitra, ´A

    S. Mitra, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Aulich, M. Neuhaus, R. E. F. Silva, V. Pervak, M. F. Kling, and S. Biswas, Light-wave-controlled haldane model in monolayer hexagonal bor on nitride, Nature 628, 12 752–757 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [36]

    M. S. Mrudul, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Light-induced valleytr onics in pristine graphene, Optica 8, 422–427 (2021)

    work page 2021

  19. [37]

    Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R

    ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, R. E. F. Silva, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Lightwave control of topological proper- ties in 2d materials for sub-cycle and non-resonant valley manipulation, Nature Photonics 14, 728–732 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [39]

    Tyulnev, ´A

    I. Tyulnev, ´A. Jim´ enez-Gal´ an, J. Poborska, L. Vamos, P. S. J. Russell, F. Tani, O. Smirnova, M. Ivanov, R. E. F. Silva, and J. Biegert, Valleytronics in bulk mos 2 with a topologic optical field, Nature 628, 746–751 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [40]

    Sharma, D

    S. Sharma, D. Gill, J. Krishna, J. K. Dewhurst, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Combining thz and infrared light to control valley charge and current in gapless graphene, Nano Lett. 25, 3791–3798 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [44]

    S. A. Sato, P. Tang, M. A. Sentef, U. D. Giovannini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Ru bio, Light-induced anoma- lous hall effect in massless dirac fermion systems and topological insulat ors with dissipation, New J. Phys. 21, 093005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  23. [47]

    L. D. Landau, Zur theorie der energieubertragung. ii, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 2, 46–51 (1932)

    work page 1932

  24. [48]

    Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proc

    C. Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proc. R. Soc. A 137, 696–702 (1932)

    work page 1932

  25. [49]

    Kitamura, N

    S. Kitamura, N. Nagaosa, and T. Morimoto, Nonreciprocal landau-zener tunneli ng, Communications Physics 3, 63 (2020)

    work page 2020

  26. [52]

    D. Gill, S. Shallcross, W. Chen, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Sharma, Cou pled femtoexcitons, free carriers, 13 and light, Nano Letters 25, 33, 12439–12445 (2025)

    work page 2025

  27. [54]

    generalized gradient approximation made si mple

    Y. Zhang and W. Yang, Comment on “generalized gradient approximation made si mple”, Physical Review Letters 80, 890 (1998). 14 Driver pulse Pump pulse MoS2 momentum space Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 K K’ single Q valley polarization 15 Energy (eV) 0 40 80 120 160 K’ Q5 G Q2 K 3 2 1 0 -1 0.2 0 -0.2 E. field (V/nm)60 30 0 -30 A (a.u.) (i) (ii) (iii) t (fs) kx ky kx k...

    work page 1998

  28. [55]

    J. R. Schaibley, H. Yu, G. Clark, P. Rivera, J. S. Ross, K. L. Seyler , W. Yao, and X. Xu, Valleytronics in 2d materials, Nature Reviews Materials 1, 16055 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [56]

    S. A. Vitale, D. Nezich, J. O. Varghese, P. Kim, N. Gedik, P. Jarillo-H errero, D. Xiao, and M. Roth- schild, Valleytronics: Opportunities, challenges, and paths forwar d, Small 14, 1801483 (2018)

    work page 2018

  30. [57]

    Xiao, G.-B

    D. Xiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Feng, X. Xu, and W. Yao, Coupled spin and valley physi cs in monolayers of mos2 and other group-vi dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  31. [58]

    K. F. Mak, K. He, J. Shan, and T. F. Heinz, Control of valley polarization in monolayer mos2 by optical helicity, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 494498 (2012)

    work page 2012

  32. [59]

    Langer, C

    F. Langer, C. P. Schmid, S. Schlauderer, M. Gmitra, J. Fabian, P. Nagle r, C. Schller, T. Korn, P. G. Hawkins, J. T. Steiner, U. Huttner, S. W. Koch, M. Kira, and R. Huber, Lightwave valleytronics in a monolayer of tungsten diselenide, Nature 557, 7680 (2018)

    work page 2018

  33. [60]

    X. Xu, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and T. F. Heinz, Spin and pseudospins in layered tr ansition metal dichalco- genides, Nature Physics 10, 343350 (2014)

    work page 2014

  34. [61]

    W. Yao, D. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Valley-dependent optoelectronics from in version symmetry breaking, Physical Review B 77, 235406 (2008)

    work page 2008

  35. [62]

    Kim and J

    Y. Kim and J. D. Lee, Anomalous electron dynamics induced through the v alley magnetic domain: a pathway to the valleytronic current processing, Nano Lett. 19, 41664173 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [63]

    T. Cao, G. Wang, W. Han, H. Ye, C. Zhu, J. Shi, Q. Niu, P. Tan, E. Wang, B. Liu, and J. Feng, Valley-selective circular dichroism of monolayer molybdenum disu lphide, Nat. Commun. 3, 887 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [64]

    H. Zeng, J. Dai, W. Yao, D. Xiao, and X. Cui, Valley polarization in mos 2 monolayers by optical pumping, Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 490493 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [65]

    Park and J

    H. Park and J. D. Lee, Floquet engineering of excitons in monolayer mos 2, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184318 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [66]

    G. Bae, Y. Kim, and J. D. Lee, Revealing berry curvature of the unocc upied band in high harmonic generation, Phys. Rev. B 106, 205422 (2022)

    work page 2022

  40. [67]

    L. Du, T. Zhang, M. Liao, G. Liu, S. Wang, R. He, Z. Ye, H. Yu, R. Yang, D. Shi, Y. Yao, and G. Zhang, Temperature-driven evolution of critical points, interla yer coupling, and layer polarization in bilayer mos 2, Physical Review B 97, 165410 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [68]

    Tatsumi and R

    Y. Tatsumi and R. Saito, Interplay of valley selection and helicity e xchange of light in raman scattering for graphene and mos 2, Physical Review B 97, 115407 (2018)

    work page 2018

  42. [69]

    L. Du, Q. Zhang, T. Zhang, Z. Jia, J. Liang, G.-B. Liu, R. Yang, D. Shi, J. Xian g, K. Liu, Z. Sun, Y. Yao, Q. Zhang, and G. Zhang, Robust circular polarization of indirect q-k tr ansitions in bilayer 3r-ws2, Physical Review B 100, 161404(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [70]

    W. Feng, Y. Yao, W. Zhu, J. Zhou, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Intrinsic spin hall eff ect in monolayers of 6 group-vi dichalcogenides: A first-principles study, Physical Rev iew B 86, 165108 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [71]

    H. Liu, J. Chen, H. Yu, F. Yang, L. Jiao, G.-B. Liu, W. Ho, C. Gao, J. Jia, W. Yao, an d M. Xie, Observation of intervalley quantum interference in epitaxial monola yer tungsten diselenide, Nature Communications 6, 8180 (2015)

    work page 2015

  45. [72]

    H. Yuan, X. Wang, B. Lian, H. Zhang, X. Fang, B. Shen, G. Xu, Y. Xu, S.-C. Zhang, H. Y. Hw ang, and Y. Cui, Generation and electric control of spinvalley-coupled circul ar photogalvanic current in wse 2, Nature Nanotechnology 9, 851857 (2014)

    work page 2014

  46. [73]

    Z. Wu, S. Xu, H. Lu, A. Khamoshi, G.-B. Liu, T. Han, Y. Wu, J. Lin, G. Long, Y. He, Y. Cai, Y. Yao, F. Zhang, and N. Wang, Evenodd layer-dependent magnetotransport of high-m obility q-valley electrons in transition metal disulfides, Nature Communications 7, 12955 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [74]

    C. E. M. Nielsen, F. Fischer, and G. Bester, Beyond the k-valley : exploring unique trion states in indirect band gap monolayer wse 2, npj 2D Materials and Applications 9, 11 (2025)

    work page 2025

  48. [75]

    Perea-Causin, S

    R. Perea-Causin, S. Brem, O. Schmidt, and E. Malic, Trion photolum inescence and trion stability in atomically thin semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 036903 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [76]

    Schiffrin, T

    A. Schiffrin, T. Paasch-Colberg, N. Karpowicz, V. Apalkov, D. Gerster , S. Mhlbrandt, M. Korbman, J. Reichert, M. Schultze, S. Holzner, J. V. Barth, R. Kienberger, R . Ernstorfer, V. S. Yakovlev, M. I. Stockman, and F. Krausz, Optical-field-induced current in diele ctrics, Nature 493, 7074 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [77]

    S. Y. Kruchinin, F. Krausz, and V. S. Yakovlev, Colloquium: Strong- field phenomena in periodic systems, Rev. of Mod. Phys. 90, 021002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  51. [78]

    Heide, T

    C. Heide, T. Boolakee, T. Higuchi, and P. Hommelhoff, Adiabaticity paramet ers for the categorization of light-matter interaction: From weak to strong driving, Phys. Rev. A 104, 023103 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [79]

    Higuchi, C

    T. Higuchi, C. Heide, K. Ullmann, H. B. Weber, and P. Hommelhoff, Light-fie ld-driven currents in graphene, Nature 550, 224228 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [80]

    Boolakee, C

    T. Boolakee, C. Heide, A. Garzn-Ramrez, H. B. Weber, I. Franco, and P. Hom melhoff, Light-field control of real and virtual charge carriers, Nature 605, 251255 (2022)

    work page 2022

  54. [81]

    Lucchini, S

    M. Lucchini, S. A. Sato, G. D. Lucarelli, B. Moio, G. Inzani, R. Borrego-V arillas, F. Frassetto, L. Po- letto, H. Hbener, U. De Giovannini, A. Rubio, and M. Nisoli, Unravelling t he intertwined atomic and bulk nature of localised excitons by attosecond spectroscopy, Nature Com munications 12, 1021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [82]

    Volkov, S

    M. Volkov, S. A. Sato, A. Niedermayr, A. Rubio, L. Gallmann, and U. Keller, Floquet-bloch resonances in near-petahertz electroabsorption spectroscopy of sio 2, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184304 (2023)

    work page 2023

  56. [83]

    Kim, Pseudospins revealed through the giant dynamical franz-keld ysh effect in massless dirac ma- terials, npj Quantum Materials 9, 86 (2024)

    Y. Kim, Pseudospins revealed through the giant dynamical franz-keld ysh effect in massless dirac ma- terials, npj Quantum Materials 9, 86 (2024)

    work page 2024

  57. [84]

    R. E. F. Silva, M. Ivanov, and ´A. Jimnez-Galn, All-optical valley switch and clock of electronic dep has- ing, Opt. Express 30, 3034730355 (2022)

    work page 2022

  58. [85]

    Hashmi, S

    A. Hashmi, S. Yamada, A. Yamada, K. Yabana, and T. Otobe, Valley polarization contr ol in wse 2 monolayer by a single-cycle laser pulse, Physical Review B 105, 115403 (2022)

    work page 2022

  59. [86]

    Sharma, J

    S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Light-shaping of valley states, Nano Lett. 23, 1153311539 7 (2023)

    work page 2023

  60. [87]

    Sharma, P

    S. Sharma, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Valley control by linearly p olarized laser pulses:example of wse2, Optica 9, 947952 (2022)

    work page 2022

  61. [88]

    Rana and G

    N. Rana and G. Dixit, All-optical ultrafast valley switching in two-d imensional materials, Phys. Rev. Applied 19, 034056 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [89]

    Mitra, ´A

    S. Mitra, ´A. Jimnez-Galn, M. Aulich, M. Neuhaus, R. E. F. Silva, V. Pervak, M. F. K ling, and S. Biswas, Light-wave-controlled haldane model in monolayer hexagonal boron nitride , Nature 628, 752757 (2024)

    work page 2024

  63. [90]

    M. S. Mrudul, ´A. Jimnez-Galn, M. Ivanov, and G. Dixit, Light-induced valleytronic s in pristine graphene, Optica 8, 422427 (2021)

    work page 2021

  64. [91]

    Jimnez-Galn, R

    ´A. Jimnez-Galn, R. E. F. Silva, O. Smirnova, and M. Ivanov, Lightwave c ontrol of topological properties in 2d materials for sub-cycle and non-resonant valley manipulation, Nature Photonics 14, 728732 (2020)

    work page 2020

  65. [92]

    Kumari, G

    R. Kumari, G. Dixit, and A. Kundu, Valley filtering and valley valve s in irradiated pristine graphene, Phys. Rev. B 111, 155421 (2025)

    work page 2025

  66. [93]

    Tyulnev, ´A

    I. Tyulnev, ´A. Jimnez-Galn, J. Poborska, L. Vamos, P. S. J. Russell, F. Tani, O. Smir nova, M. Ivanov, R. E. F. Silva, and J. Biegert, Valleytronics in bulk mos 2 with a topologic optical field, Nature 628, 746751 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [94]

    Sharma, D

    S. Sharma, D. Gill, J. Krishna, J. K. Dewhurst, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Combining thz and infrared light to control valley charge and current in gapless graphene, Nano Lett. 25, 37913798 (2025)

    work page 2025

  68. [95]

    Sharma, D

    S. Sharma, D. Gill, J. Krishna, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Direct coupling of light to valley current, Nature Communications 15, 7579 (2024)

    work page 2024

  69. [96]

    D. Gill, S. Sharma, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Shallcross, Ultrafast all- optical generation of pure spin and valley currents, npj 2D Materials and Applications 9, 49 (2025)

    work page 2025

  70. [97]

    S. A. Sato, H. Hirori, Y. Sanari, Y. Kanemitsu, and A. Rubio, High-order harmonic generation in graphene: Nonlinear coupling of intraband and interband transitions, Phy sical Review B 103, L041408 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [98]

    S. A. Sato, P. Tang, M. A. Sentef, U. D. Giovannini, H. Hbener, and A. Rubio, Light-induced anomalous hall effect in massless dirac fermion systems and topological insulators w ith dissipation, New J. Phys. 21, 093005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [99]

    Liu, W.-Y

    G.-B. Liu, W.-Y. Shan, Y. Yao, W. Yao, and D. Xiao, Three-band tight-bindin g model for monolayers of group-vib transition metal dichalcogenides, Physical Review B 88, 085433 (2013)

    work page 2013

  73. [100]

    Sharma, P

    S. Sharma, P. Elliott, and S. Shallcross, Thz induced giant spin and v alley currents, Sci. Adv. 9, 11 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [101]

    L. D. Landau, Zur theorie der energieubertragung. ii, Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion 2, 4651 (1932)

    work page 1932

  75. [102]

    Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proc

    C. Zener, Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels, Proc. R. Soc. A 137, 696702 (1932)

    work page 1932

  76. [103]

    Kitamura, N

    S. Kitamura, N. Nagaosa, and T. Morimoto, Nonreciprocal landau-zener tunneli ng, Communications Physics 3, 63 (2020). 8

    work page 2020

  77. [104]

    J. K. Dewhurst, D. Gill, S. Shallcross, and S. Sharma, Kohn-sham-p roca equations for ultrafast exciton dynamics, Physical Review B 111, L060302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [105]

    Sun, C.-W

    J. Sun, C.-W. Lee, A. Kononov, A. Schleife, and C. A. Ullrich, Real-ti me exciton dynamics with time- dependent density-functional theory, Physical Review Letters 127, 077401 (2021)

    work page 2021

  79. [106]

    D. Gill, S. Shallcross, W. Chen, J. K. Dewhurst, and S. Sharma, Cou pled femtoexcitons, free carriers, and light, Nano Letters 25, 33, 1243912445 (2025)

    work page 2025

  80. [107]

    https://elk.sourceforge.io

    work page

Showing first 80 references.