pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.07366 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.str-el

Non-Abelian Chern band in rhombohedral graphene multilayers

Taketo Uchida , Takuto Kawakami , Mikito Koshino This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el
keywords non-Abelian Chern bandsrhombohedral grapheneinteraction-driven topologyHartree-Fock approximationSU(2) gauge fluxChern numberflat bandsspontaneous symmetry breaking
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electron interactions spontaneously generate a doubly degenerate non-Abelian Chern band with |C|=1 at filling factor 2 in rhombohedral multilayer graphene.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that rhombohedral graphene stacks with three to five layers host interaction-driven topological bands that carry both ordinary Chern number and non-Abelian structure without requiring artificial moiré potentials or external substrates. Self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations show that the Fock exchange term breaks symmetries at filling ν=2 and produces Berry curvature with SU(2) character. A sympathetic reader would care because this supplies a relatively simple, gate-tunable material platform for studying non-Abelian anyonic excitations and related topological phases. The work further maps how displacement field and periodicity tune the phase and demonstrates that the resulting topology produces global non-Abelian holonomy around the Brillouin zone.

Core claim

At filling ν=2 in rhombohedral 3-, 4-, and 5-layer graphene, a doubly degenerate band with Chern number |C|=1 forms spontaneously; the Fock term drives the symmetry breaking that endows the bands with non-Abelian Berry curvature characterized by SU(2) gauge flux threading noncontractible cycles of the Brillouin zone, yielding a global non-Abelian holonomy independent of hBN alignment.

What carries the argument

The Fock exchange term within self-consistent Hartree-Fock theory, which generates spontaneous symmetry breaking and non-Abelian Berry curvature.

If this is right

  • Phase diagrams in displacement field and periodicity show the non-Abelian Chern band remains stable across accessible experimental ranges for 3-, 4-, and 5-layer stacks.
  • The topology is independent of hBN substrate, allowing realization in suspended or differently encapsulated samples.
  • The non-Abelian character arises specifically from SU(2) gauge flux through Brillouin-zone cycles rather than from engineered lattice symmetries.
  • Global non-Abelian holonomy around the torus implies distinct braiding or interference responses compared with ordinary Chern bands.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mechanism may produce non-Abelian bands at other integer fillings or in even-layer rhombohedral stacks once the flat-band condition is met.
  • Partial filling of the doubly degenerate band could stabilize fractional non-Abelian states whose quasiparticle statistics differ from those in single-band fractional Chern insulators.
  • Gate tuning of the displacement field offers a direct experimental knob to switch between Abelian and non-Abelian regimes within the same device.

Load-bearing premise

The Hartree-Fock mean-field treatment reliably describes the spontaneous symmetry breaking and the resulting non-Abelian Berry curvature at the fillings and displacement fields considered.

What would settle it

Transport or spectroscopic signatures of non-Abelian holonomy, such as fractional Chern insulator states appearing upon doping the doubly degenerate band away from ν=2, would confirm or refute the predicted topology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.07366 by Mikito Koshino, Taketo Uchida, Takuto Kawakami.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Band structure, local charge density and local spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Brillouin zone for the model Hamiltonian Eq. (11) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Band structures, charge distributions, and spin textures of the ground states corresponding to the phase diagram (Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Band gap for rhombohedral 3-, 4- and 5-layer graphene in the absence of hBN. The electronic period [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Band gap for 3- and 4-layer systems at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Moir\'e flat bands in rhombohedral multilayer graphene provide a platform for exploring interaction-driven topological phases, where a single isolated band often forms a Chern band. However, non-Abelian degenerate Chern bands with internal symmetries such as $\mathrm{SU}(N)$ have so far been realized only in highly engineered systems. Here, we show that a doubly degenerate non-Abelian Chern band with Chern number $|C|=1$ emerges spontaneously at filling $\nu=2$ in rhombohedral 3-, 4-, and 5-layer graphene, regardless of the presence of an hBN substrate. Using self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations, we map out phase diagrams as functions of displacement field and electronic periodicity, and analytically demonstrate that the Fock term drives spontaneous symmetry breaking and generates non-Abelian Berry curvature. We further show that this non-Abelian topology is characterized by $\mathrm{SU}(2)$ gauge flux threading the noncontractible cycles of the Brillouin zone, leading to a global non-Abelian holonomy. Our findings unveil a new class of interaction-driven non-Abelian topological phases, distinct from quantum anomalous Hall and fractional Chern phases.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations on a microscopic tight-binding model of rhombohedral 3-, 4-, and 5-layer graphene reveal spontaneous emergence, at filling ν=2, of a doubly degenerate Chern band with |C|=1 that carries non-Abelian Berry curvature (SU(2) gauge flux through non-contractible Brillouin-zone cycles), independent of hBN substrate. Phase diagrams are mapped versus displacement field and electronic periodicity, and an analytic argument is given that the Fock term alone drives the symmetry breaking and generates the non-Abelian holonomy.

Significance. If substantiated, the result supplies a comparatively simple, interaction-driven route to non-Abelian Chern bands in multilayer graphene without requiring moiré engineering or external fields, thereby enlarging the set of candidate platforms for studying non-Abelian topological order. The combination of extensive numerical phase diagrams with an analytic link between the Fock term and non-Abelian curvature is a positive feature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Hartree-Fock numerics and analytic argument] The central claim that the non-Abelian topology survives beyond mean-field rests on the reliability of the self-consistent Hartree-Fock approximation in these flat-band systems at ν=2. No convergence tests with respect to system size, k-point sampling, or interaction strength are referenced, nor is there a direct comparison to exact methods on small clusters that would quantify fluctuation corrections to the degeneracy or the projected Berry curvature.
  2. [Analytic demonstration of non-Abelian curvature] The analytic step asserting that the Fock term directly generates non-Abelian Berry curvature (rather than merely breaking symmetry) is load-bearing for the topology claim. The manuscript should explicitly show how the effective low-energy Hamiltonian after HF projection yields an SU(2) gauge field whose holonomy is non-trivial on non-contractible cycles, including any assumptions about band projection or interaction renormalization.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and phase diagrams] Figure captions and phase-diagram legends should state the precise values of the screened Coulomb interaction strength and the displacement-field range used for each panel.
  2. [Methods] The definition of the non-Abelian Chern number and the numerical procedure for extracting the SU(2) flux through the Brillouin-zone torus should be collected in a dedicated methods subsection for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our results and for the detailed comments, which help clarify the presentation of the Hartree-Fock numerics and the analytic argument. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the non-Abelian topology survives beyond mean-field rests on the reliability of the self-consistent Hartree-Fock approximation in these flat-band systems at ν=2. No convergence tests with respect to system size, k-point sampling, or interaction strength are referenced, nor is there a direct comparison to exact methods on small clusters that would quantify fluctuation corrections to the degeneracy or the projected Berry curvature.

    Authors: We agree that explicit convergence tests strengthen the numerical evidence. In the revised manuscript we have added supplementary figures demonstrating convergence of the self-consistent solutions with respect to k-point sampling density and interaction strength (scaled by a factor of 0.5–2.0). For system size, calculations were performed on supercells up to 12×12 in the moiré Brillouin zone; the doubly degenerate Chern bands and their non-Abelian holonomy remain stable. A direct comparison with exact diagonalization on small clusters is not feasible for the multilayer systems considered, because the Hilbert space grows exponentially and small clusters cannot accommodate the non-contractible cycles needed to probe the global SU(2) holonomy. We therefore rely on the analytic demonstration that the Fock term alone generates the non-Abelian curvature, which is independent of the mean-field approximation details. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The analytic step asserting that the Fock term directly generates non-Abelian Berry curvature (rather than merely breaking symmetry) is load-bearing for the topology claim. The manuscript should explicitly show how the effective low-energy Hamiltonian after HF projection yields an SU(2) gauge field whose holonomy is non-trivial on non-contractible cycles, including any assumptions about band projection or interaction renormalization.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the analytic section (now Section IV) to derive the effective low-energy Hamiltonian after Hartree-Fock projection onto the two degenerate bands at ν=2. Starting from the microscopic tight-binding model plus Coulomb interaction, we project the Fock term onto the occupied subspace and obtain an SU(2) gauge connection whose Berry curvature is computed explicitly. We show that the resulting Wilson loop around non-contractible Brillouin-zone cycles yields a non-trivial SU(2) holonomy, with the only assumptions being (i) projection onto the isolated pair of bands and (ii) neglect of inter-band mixing induced by the Hartree term (justified by the large gap opened by the Fock term). Interaction renormalization is treated at the level of the self-consistent HF potential; higher-order corrections are discussed as future work. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • A quantitative assessment of fluctuation corrections via exact methods on clusters large enough to capture non-Abelian holonomy remains computationally prohibitive.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in Hartree-Fock derivation of spontaneous non-Abelian Chern band

full rationale

The paper performs self-consistent Hartree-Fock calculations on a microscopic tight-binding model parameterized by displacement field and periodicity. The doubly degenerate |C|=1 band and its non-Abelian Berry curvature are extracted numerically from the converged mean-field bands and their Berry curvature integrals rather than being imposed by definition, fitted to the target topology, or reduced via self-citation chains. The analytic step connecting the Fock term to symmetry breaking follows directly from the self-consistent equations without smuggling an ansatz or renaming a known result. The derivation is therefore self-contained against the external microscopic Hamiltonian and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard definitions of Berry curvature and Chern number in band theory, plus the validity of the Hartree-Fock decoupling for Coulomb interactions in graphene. No new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented particles are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Berry curvature and Chern number are well-defined for isolated or degenerate bands in periodic systems.
    Invoked to assign |C|=1 and non-Abelian character to the computed bands.
  • domain assumption Self-consistent Hartree-Fock captures the leading interaction-driven symmetry breaking in flat-band graphene.
    Used to obtain the phase diagrams and the spontaneous emergence of the non-Abelian band.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5742 in / 1493 out tokens · 62017 ms · 2026-05-18T23:16:17.313092+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Various electronic crystal phases in rhombohedral graphene multilayers

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Rhombohedral graphene multilayers show an isospin cascade of electron crystal phases with non-zero Chern numbers and nearly degenerate topological states hosting extended quantum anomalous Hall effect as carrier densi...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 91 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Y . Xie, A. T. Pierce, J. M. Park, D. E. Parker, E. Khalaf, P. Led- with, Y . Cao, S. H. Lee, S. Chen, P. R. Forrester, et al., Nature 600, 439 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Y . Cao, V . Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y . Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxi- ras, et al., Nature 556, 80 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    Stepanov, M

    P. Stepanov, M. Xie, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, X. Lu, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and D. K. Efetov, Physical review letters 127, 197701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Zondiner, A

    U. Zondiner, A. Rozen, D. Rodan-Legrain, Y . Cao, R. Queiroz, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, Y . Oreg, F. von Oppen, A. Stern, et al., Nature 582, 203 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    J. M. Park, Y . Cao, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Nature 592, 43 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    D. Wong, K. P. Nuckolls, M. Oh, B. Lian, Y . Xie, S. Jeon, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Nature 582, 198 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Y . Choi, H. Kim, C. Lewandowski, Y . Peng, A. Thomson, R. Polski, Y . Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Alicea, et al., Nature Physics 17, 1375 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    J. Yu, B. A. Foutty, Z. Han, M. E. Barber, Y . Schattner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, P. Phillips, Z.-X. Shen, S. A. Kivel- son, et al., Nature Physics 18, 825 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    S. Chen, M. He, Y .-H. Zhang, V . Hsieh, Z. Fei, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. H. Cobden, X. Xu, C. R. Dean, et al., Nature Physics 17, 374 (2021)

    work page 2021

  10. [10]

    Polshyn, J

    H. Polshyn, J. Zhu, M. A. Kumar, Y . Zhang, F. Yang, C. L. Tschirhart, M. Serlin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. H. Mac- Donald, et al., Nature 588, 66 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Polshyn, Y

    H. Polshyn, Y . Zhang, M. A. Kumar, T. Soejima, P. Ledwith, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Nature Physics18, 42 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    Zhang, T

    C. Zhang, T. Zhu, T. Soejima, S. Kahn, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Zettl, F. Wang, M. P. Zaletel, and M. F. Crom- mie, Nature Communications 14, 3595 (2023)

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    Y . Cao, D. Rodan-Legrain, O. Rubies-Bigorda, J. M. Park, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and P. Jarillo-Herrero, Nature 583, 215 (2020)

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    G. W. Burg, J. Zhu, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. H. MacDon- ald, and E. Tutuc, Physical review letters 123, 197702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    X. Liu, Z. Hao, E. Khalaf, J. Y . Lee, Y . Ronen, H. Yoo, D. Haei Najafabadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Vishwanath, et al., Nature 583, 221 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    M. He, Y . Li, J. Cai, Y . Liu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, X. Xu, and M. Yankowitz, Nature Physics 17, 26 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    C. Shen, Y . Chu, Q. Wu, N. Li, S. Wang, Y . Zhao, J. Tang, J. Liu, J. Tian, K. Watanabe, et al., Nature Physics 16, 520 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    L.-Q. Xia, S. C. de la Barrera, A. Uri, A. Sharpe, Y . H. Kwan, Z. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Goldhaber-Gordon, L. Fu, et al., Nature Physics pp. 1–6 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    T. Li, S. Jiang, B. Shen, Y . Zhang, L. Li, Z. Tao, T. Devakul, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, et al., Nature 600, 641 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    W. Zhao, K. Kang, Y . Zhang, P. Kn¨uppel, Z. Tao, L. Li, C. L. Tschirhart, E. Redekop, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Na- ture Physics 20, 275 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Z. Tao, B. Shen, S. Jiang, T. Li, L. Li, L. Ma, W. Zhao, J. Hu, K. Pistunova, K. Watanabe, et al., Physical Review X 14, 011004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    B. A. Foutty, C. R. Kometter, T. Devakul, A. P. Reddy, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and B. E. Feldman, Science 384, 343 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    J. Cai, E. Anderson, C. Wang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, W. Holtzmann, Y . Zhang, F. Fan, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, et al., Nature622, 63 (2023)

    work page 2023

  24. [24]

    Y . Zeng, Z. Xia, K. Kang, J. Zhu, P. Kn ¨uppel, C. Vaswani, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, K. F. Mak, and J. Shan, Nature622, 69 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    H. Park, J. Cai, E. Anderson, Y . Zhang, J. Zhu, X. Liu, C. Wang, W. Holtzmann, C. Hu, Z. Liu, et al., Nature 622, 74 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    F. Xu, Z. Sun, T. Jia, C. Liu, C. Xu, C. Li, Y . Gu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, B. Tong, et al., Physical Review X 13, 031037 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    F. Wu, T. Lovorn, E. Tutuc, I. Martin, and A. MacDonald, Phys- ical review letters 122, 086402 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    H. Yu, M. Chen, and W. Yao, National Science Review 7, 12 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Zhai and W

    D. Zhai and W. Yao, Physical Review Materials 4, 094002 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    H. Tang, S. Carr, and E. Kaxiras, Physical Review B 104, 155415 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    Devakul, V

    T. Devakul, V . Cr´epel, Y . Zhang, and L. Fu, Nature communi- cations 12, 6730 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    Zhang, T

    Y . Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2112673118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    J. Wang, J. Zang, J. Cano, and A. J. Millis, Physical Review Research 5, L012005 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    H. Pan, F. Wu, and S. Das Sarma, Physical Review Research 2, 033087 (2020)

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Abouelkomsan, E

    A. Abouelkomsan, E. J. Bergholtz, and S. Chatterjee, Physical Review Letters 133, 026801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    Cr ´epel, N

    V . Cr ´epel, N. Regnault, and R. Queiroz, Communications Physics 7, 146 (2024)

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Li, W.-X

    B. Li, W.-X. Qiu, and F. Wu, Physical Review B 109, L041106 (2024)

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    W.-X. Qiu, B. Li, X.-J. Luo, and F. Wu, Physical Review X 13, 041026 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    H. Li, U. Kumar, K. Sun, and S.-Z. Lin, Physical Review Re- search 3, L032070 (2021)

    work page 2021

  40. [40]

    Cr´epel and L

    V . Cr´epel and L. Fu, Physical Review B 107, L201109 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [41]

    Morales-Dur ´an, J

    N. Morales-Dur ´an, J. Wang, G. R. Schleder, M. Angeli, Z. Zhu, E. Kaxiras, C. Repellin, and J. Cano, Physical Review Research 5, L032022 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Wang, X.-W

    C. Wang, X.-W. Zhang, X. Liu, Y . He, X. Xu, Y . Ran, T. Cao, and D. Xiao, Physical Review Letters 132, 036501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    A. P. Reddy, F. Alsallom, Y . Zhang, T. Devakul, and L. Fu, Physical Review B 108, 085117 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Y . Jia, J. Yu, J. Liu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Z. Qi, H. Pi, N. Reg- nault, H. Weng, B. A. Bernevig, and Q. Wu, Physical Review B 109, 205121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, M. Wang, O. Vafek, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Physical Review B 109, 045147 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    T. Wang, T. Devakul, M. P. Zaletel, and L. Fu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02501 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    Goldman, A

    H. Goldman, A. P. Reddy, N. Paul, and L. Fu, Physical review letters 131, 136501 (2023)

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    A. P. Reddy and L. Fu, Physical Review B 108, 245159 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    J. Dong, J. Wang, P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Physical Review Letters 131, 136502 (2023)

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Morales-Dur ´an, N

    N. Morales-Dur ´an, N. Wei, J. Shi, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys- 6 ical Review Letters 132, 096602 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Z. Lu, T. Han, Y . Yao, A. P. Reddy, J. Yang, J. Seo, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, and L. Ju, Nature626, 759 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Y . Choi, Y . Choi, M. Valentini, C. L. Patterson, L. F. Holleis, O. I. Sheekey, H. Stoyanov, X. Cheng, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, et al., Nature pp. 1–6 (2025)

    work page 2025

  53. [53]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, Y .-H. Zhang, S. Wang, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Na- ture 579, 56 (2020)

    work page 2020

  54. [54]

    H. Zhou, T. Xie, A. Ghazaryan, T. Holder, J. R. Ehrets, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, E. Berg, M. Serbyn, et al., Nature 598, 429 (2021)

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, Y . Yao, J. Yang, J. Seo, C. Yoon, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, F. Zhang, et al., Science384, 647 (2024)

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, S. Wang, B. Lyu, L. Jiang, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. F. Crommie, et al., Nano letters 22, 238 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [57]

    E. M. Spanton, A. A. Zibrov, H. Zhou, T. Taniguchi, K. Watan- abe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Science360, 62 (2018)

    work page 2018

  58. [58]

    G. Chen, A. L. Sharpe, P. Gallagher, I. T. Rosen, E. J. Fox, L. Jiang, B. Lyu, H. Li, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, et al., Na- ture 572, 215 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [59]

    Zhang, D

    Y .-H. Zhang, D. Mao, Y . Cao, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and T. Senthil, Physical Review B 99, 075127 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    B. L. Chittari, G. Chen, Y . Zhang, F. Wang, and J. Jung, Physi- cal review letters 122, 016401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    Repellin, Z

    C. Repellin, Z. Dong, Y .-H. Zhang, and T. Senthil, Physical Review Letters 124, 187601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Zhang and T

    Y .-H. Zhang and T. Senthil, Physical Review B 99, 205150 (2019)

    work page 2019

  63. [63]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zaletel, A. Vish- wanath, and D. E. Parker, Physical Review Letters133, 206503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Z. Dong, A. S. Patri, and T. Senthil, Physical Review Letters 133, 206502 (2024)

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    B. Zhou, H. Yang, and Y .-H. Zhang, Physical Review Letters 133, 206504 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Z. Guo, X. Lu, B. Xie, and J. Liu, Physical Review B 110, 075109 (2024)

    work page 2024

  67. [67]

    Y . H. Kwan, J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, D. K. Efetov, N. Reg- nault, and B. A. Bernevig, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11617 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [68]

    Zhou and Y .-H

    B. Zhou and Y .-H. Zhang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04174 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    K. Kudo, R. Nakai, and K. Nomura, Physical Review B 110, 245135 (2024)

    work page 2024

  70. [70]

    Nature 608, 298 (2022)

    work page 2022

  71. [71]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, G. Scuri, J. Sung, J. Wang, T. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. Park, and L. Ju, Nature Nanotechnology 19, 181 (2024)

    work page 2024

  72. [72]

    K. Liu, J. Zheng, Y . Sha, B. Lyu, F. Li, Y . Park, Y . Ren, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jia, et al., arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11042 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  73. [73]

    T. Han, Z. Lu, G. Scuri, J. Sung, J. Wang, T. Han, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Fu, H. Park, et al., Nature623, 41 (2023)

    work page 2023

  74. [74]

    Y . Sha, J. Zheng, K. Liu, H. Du, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, J. Jia, Z. Shi, R. Zhong, and G. Chen, Science 384, 414 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [75]

    Goldman and P

    N. Goldman and P. Gaspard, Europhysics Letters 78, 60001 (2007)

    work page 2007

  76. [76]

    Goldman, A

    N. Goldman, A. Kubasiak, P. Gaspard, and M. Lewenstein, Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 79, 023624 (2009)

    work page 2009

  77. [77]

    Goldman, A

    N. Goldman, A. Kubasiak, A. Bermudez, P. Gaspard, M. Lewenstein, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, Physical review let- ters 103, 035301 (2009)

    work page 2009

  78. [78]

    Osterloh, M

    K. Osterloh, M. Baig, L. Santos, P. Zoller, and M. Lewenstein, Physical review letters 95, 010403 (2005)

    work page 2005

  79. [79]

    Parto, C

    M. Parto, C. Leefmans, J. Williams, F. Nori, and A. Marandi, Nature Communications 14, 1440 (2023)

    work page 2023

  80. [80]

    J. C. Halimeh, L. Homeier, A. Bohrdt, and F. Grusdt, PRX Quantum 5, 030358 (2024)

    work page 2024

Showing first 80 references.