pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.08366 · v2 · submitted 2025-08-11 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.quant-gas· cond-mat.str-el

Deconfined quantum criticality on a triangular Rydberg array

Lisa Bombieri , Torsten V. Zache , Gabriele Calliari , Mikhail D. Lukin , Hannes Pichler , Daniel Gonz\'alez-Cuadra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-el
keywords deconfined quantum criticalityRydberg atomstriangular latticephase transitionconformal field theoryU(1) symmetryquantum simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

The phase transition between 1/3 and 2/3 Rydberg excitation densities on a triangular lattice is a deconfined quantum critical point.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to establish that Rydberg atoms arranged on a triangular lattice and interacting via van der Waals forces can realize a deconfined quantum critical point between two distinct ordered phases. Field theory is used to forecast the critical exponents on long cylinders and the appearance of a conformal field theory with enlarged U(1) symmetry near the transition, after which numerical checks confirm these signatures. The work also treats ladder geometries and outlines how finite tweezer arrays could detect the emergent symmetry. A reader would care because experimental realizations of deconfined criticality have remained out of reach even though the concept has been studied theoretically for years.

Core claim

The authors predict, via field-theoretical analysis, both the critical exponents for infinitely long cylinders of increasing circumference and the emergence of a conformal field theory near criticality that displays an enlarged U(1) symmetry, a signature of deconfined quantum critical points. These predictions are confirmed numerically for the Rydberg system at the transition between the 1/3 and 2/3 excitation-density ordered phases. The same signatures are shown to persist in ladder geometries, and a concrete protocol is given for probing the emergent U(1) symmetry in finite experimental tweezer arrays.

What carries the argument

Field-theoretical analysis of the effective model generated by van der Waals interactions among Rydberg atoms on the triangular lattice, which identifies the 1/3-to-2/3 transition as a deconfined quantum critical point and yields its critical exponents together with the enlarged U(1) symmetry of the nearby conformal field theory.

If this is right

  • Critical exponents are predicted for cylinders of increasing circumference and match those expected for a deconfined quantum critical point.
  • A conformal field theory appears near criticality and exhibits an enlarged U(1) symmetry.
  • The same signatures persist when the geometry is restricted to ladders.
  • The emergent U(1) symmetry can be probed experimentally with finite tweezer arrays.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The Rydberg platform supplies a controllable quantum simulator for testing theories of deconfined criticality that have so far lacked experimental access.
  • The same interaction and lattice design could be adapted to study related exotic transitions in other two-dimensional geometries.
  • Confirmation of the predicted symmetry would motivate scaling the array size to access the thermodynamic limit of the critical theory.

Load-bearing premise

The van der Waals interactions on the triangular lattice produce an effective model whose transition between the 1/3 and 2/3 ordered phases is a continuous deconfined quantum critical point rather than a first-order transition.

What would settle it

A direct measurement of the critical exponents or correlation functions in the Rydberg array that deviates from the field-theory predictions or reveals a discontinuous jump in the order parameter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.08366 by Daniel Gonz\'alez-Cuadra, Gabriele Calliari, Hannes Pichler, Lisa Bombieri, Mikhail D. Lukin, Torsten V. Zache.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Neutral atoms trapped on a triangular tweezer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Mapping from a 2D cylindrical lattice to a 1D field theory model. The phase of the magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Correlation length [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Fluctuations can drive continuous phase transitions between two distinct ordered phases -- so-called deconfined quantum critical points (DQCPs) -- which lie beyond the Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm. Despite several theoretical predictions over the past decades, experimental evidence of DQCPs remains elusive. We show that a DQCP can be explored in a system of Rydberg atoms arranged on a triangular lattice and coupled through van der Waals interactions. Specifically, we investigate the nature of the phase transition between two ordered phases at 1/3 and 2/3 Rydberg excitation density, which were recently probed experimentally in [P. Scholl et al., Nature 595, 233 (2021)]. Using a field-theoretical analysis, we predict both the critical exponents for infinitely long cylinders of increasing circumference and the emergence of a conformal field theory near criticality showing an enlarged U(1) symmetry -- a signature of DQCPs -- and confirm these predictions numerically. Finally, we extend these results to ladder geometries and show how the emergent U(1) symmetry could be probed experimentally using finite tweezer arrays.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the phase transition between the 1/3 and 2/3 Rydberg excitation density ordered phases in a triangular-lattice Rydberg atom array with van der Waals interactions realizes a deconfined quantum critical point. Field theory is used to predict critical exponents on infinitely long cylinders of increasing circumference and the emergence of an enlarged U(1) symmetry in the nearby conformal field theory; these predictions are stated to be confirmed by numerical simulations, with an extension to ladder geometries proposed for experimental detection of the emergent symmetry using finite tweezer arrays.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work is significant for identifying a concrete, experimentally realizable platform for DQCPs using Rydberg atoms, a system already probed in related experiments. The combination of field-theoretic predictions for cylinder geometries and numerical verification, together with concrete suggestions for probing emergent U(1) symmetry, provides a clear route from theory to potential observation. The absence of free parameters in the mapping and the focus on falsifiable signatures (exponents and symmetry) are strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical simulations] Numerical simulations section: The DMRG results on cylinders are reported to confirm the field-theory exponents and emergent U(1) symmetry, yet no explicit diagnostics are presented to rule out a weakly first-order transition (e.g., Binder cumulant crossings, hysteresis in the order parameter, or entanglement-spectrum degeneracy checks). Such tests are necessary because finite-circumference DQCP-like signatures are known to be mimicked by weakly first-order transitions at accessible lengths.
  2. [Field-theoretical analysis] Field-theory analysis: The mapping from the microscopic van der Waals (1/r^6) Hamiltonian to the effective model assumed to host the DQCP is stated without a detailed operator analysis showing that no relevant perturbations are generated that would drive the transition first-order; this assumption is load-bearing for the universality-class claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The abstract and introduction cite the Scholl et al. experiment but could benefit from a brief sentence clarifying how the current theoretical/numerical setup differs from or extends that work.
  2. Figure captions for the cylinder scaling plots should explicitly state the range of circumferences and bond dimensions used, to allow readers to assess convergence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Numerical simulations section: The DMRG results on cylinders are reported to confirm the field-theory exponents and emergent U(1) symmetry, yet no explicit diagnostics are presented to rule out a weakly first-order transition (e.g., Binder cumulant crossings, hysteresis in the order parameter, or entanglement-spectrum degeneracy checks). Such tests are necessary because finite-circumference DQCP-like signatures are known to be mimicked by weakly first-order transitions at accessible lengths.

    Authors: We agree that explicit diagnostics to distinguish a continuous transition from a weakly first-order one are important for strengthening the numerical evidence. In the revised manuscript, we have added Binder cumulant analysis for the relevant order parameters on cylinders of increasing circumference, showing crossings consistent with a continuous transition. We have also included an analysis of the entanglement spectrum to verify the degeneracy patterns expected from the emergent U(1) symmetry. These additions appear in an expanded subsection of the numerical results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Field-theory analysis: The mapping from the microscopic van der Waals (1/r^6) Hamiltonian to the effective model assumed to host the DQCP is stated without a detailed operator analysis showing that no relevant perturbations are generated that would drive the transition first-order; this assumption is load-bearing for the universality-class claim.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that a more detailed operator analysis would provide stronger support for the universality class. Our field-theoretic treatment relies on symmetry arguments and the structure of the effective theory for the 1/3-to-2/3 filling transition. In the revision, we have expanded the field-theory section to include an explicit discussion of why the leading perturbations arising from the van der Waals interactions are irrelevant at the DQCP fixed point, based on symmetry considerations and analogies to related models. A full microscopic derivation of all possible operators, however, lies beyond the present scope. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: field theory predictions verified by independent numerics

full rationale

The paper applies standard field-theoretical analysis of DQCPs to the Rydberg van der Waals Hamiltonian on the triangular lattice, deriving predictions for critical exponents and emergent U(1) symmetry on cylinders. These are then checked via DMRG numerics on the microscopic model. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to a fit from the same data, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior author work. The mapping and confirmation are self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the standard assumption that the physical system realizes the theoretical DQCP model without additional free parameters introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Rydberg van der Waals interactions map to an effective field theory supporting a DQCP at the 1/3 to 2/3 transition
    This underpins the field-theoretical analysis and numerical confirmation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 8911 in / 1207 out tokens · 69045 ms · 2026-05-18T23:25:30.803537+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    and temperatureT(proportional to 1/ly, and thus toK ′) [45]. In particular, it allows for a quantitative characterization of the continuous transition between the twoZ3-ordered phases, including predictions for the critical exponents, as detailed below. Here, we focus on the regime 2/9< K ′ <8/9, where theZ 6 anisotropy is irrelevant under the renormaliza...

    work page

  2. [2]

    causally separable

    The associ- ated critical exponents depend on the cylinder circumference ly through the effective Luttinger parameterK ′ =K/(ρ 2 0ly). ing dimensionx 3 = 9K ′/4 of the perturbation cos (3ϕ), according to the relationx 3 = 2−1/ν= 2β/(1 +β). We test this relation by extracting the critical exponentsν andβfrom fits of the correlation length and order param- ...

    work page doi:10.55776/coe1 2000

  3. [3]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nature Physics 16, 132 (2020)

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nature Physics17, 1324 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Altman, K

    E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Dem- ler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriks- son, K.-M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Koll´ ar, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe, K. Murch, Z. Nazario, K.-K. Ni, A. C. Potter, P. Roushan, M. Saffman, M. Schleier- Smith, I. Siddiqi, R. Simmonds,...

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Labuhn, D

    H. Labuhn, D. Barredo, S. Ravets, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, T. Macr` ı, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Tunable two- dimensional arrays of single Rydberg atoms for realizing quantum Ising models, Nature534, 667 (2016)

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579 (2017)

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. We- ber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with Rydberg atoms, Science365, 775 (2019)

    work page 2019

  9. [9]

    Keesling, A

    A. Keesling, A. Omran, H. Levine, H. Bernien, H. Pich- ler, S. Choi, R. Samajdar, S. Schwartz, P. Silvi, S. Sachdev, P. Zoller, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Kibble–Zurek mechanism and critical dynamics on a programmable Rydberg sim- ulator, Nature568, 207 (2019)

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [11]

    Scholl, M

    P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L¨ auchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hun- 6 dreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  12. [12]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. Omran, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, A. A. Michailidis, N. Maskara, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, M. Serbyn, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling quantum many- body dynamics in driven Rydberg atom arrays, Science 371, 1355 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Prob- ing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science374, 1242 (2021)

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    J. Choi, A. L. Shaw, I. S. Madjarov, X. Xie, R. Finkel- stein, J. P. Covey, J. S. Cotler, D. K. Mark, H.-Y. Huang, A. Kale, H. Pichler, F. G. S. L. Brand˜ ao, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Preparing random states and benchmarking with many-body quantum chaos, Nature613, 468 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. L¨ auchli, M. P. Zale- tel, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional Rydberg array, Nature616, 691 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    A. L. Shaw, Z. Chen, J. Choi, D. K. Mark, P. Scholl, R. Finkelstein, A. Elben, S. Choi, and M. Endres, Bench- marking highly entangled states on a 60-atom analogue quantum simulator, Nature628, 71 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Manovitz, S

    T. Manovitz, S. H. Li, S. Ebadi, R. Samajdar, A. A. Geim, S. J. Evered, D. Bluvstein, H. Zhou, N. U. Koylu- oglu, J. Feldmeier, P. E. Dolgirev, N. Maskara, M. Kali- nowski, S. Sachdev, D. A. Huse, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum coarsening and collective dy- namics on a programmable simulator, Nature638, 86 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M

    D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, M. Hamdan, T. V. Zache, B. Braverman, M. Kornjaˇ ca, A. Lukin, S. H. Cant´ u, F. Liu, S.-T. Wang, A. Keesling, M. D. Lukin, P. Zoller, and A. Bylinskii, Observation of string breaking on a (2 + 1)D Rydberg quantum simulator, Nature642, 321 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    F. Fang, K. Wang, V. S. Liu, Y. Wang, R. Cimmino, J. Wei, M. Bintz, A. Parr, J. Kemp, K.-K. Ni, and N. Y. Yao, Probing critical phenomena in open quantum sys- tems using atom arrays (2024), arXiv:2402.15376

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phases of Matter(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2023)

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phases of Matter(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    X.-G. Wen,Quantum Field Theory of Many-Body Sys- tems: From the Origin of Sound to an Origin of Light and Electrons(Oxford University Press, 2007)

    work page 2007

  22. [22]

    Senthil, A

    T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points, Science303, 1490 (2004)

    work page 2004

  23. [23]

    Senthil, L

    T. Senthil, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, A. Vishwanath, and M. P. A. Fisher, Quantum criticality beyond the Landau- Ginzburg-Wilson paradigm, Phys. Rev. B70, 144407 (2004)

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    H. Shao, W. Guo, and A. W. Sandvik, Quantum critical- ity with two length scales, Science352, 213 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, 3rd ed., Course of Theoretical Physics, Vol. 5 (Butterworth- Heinemann, Oxford, 1980)

    work page 1980

  26. [26]

    K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, The renormalization group and theϵexpansion, Physics Reports12, 75 (1974)

    work page 1974

  27. [27]

    Senthil, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points: A Re- view, in50 Years of the Renormalization Group(World Scientific, 2024) Chap

    T. Senthil, Deconfined Quantum Critical Points: A Re- view, in50 Years of the Renormalization Group(World Scientific, 2024) Chap. Chapter 14, pp. 169–195

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    M. E. Zayed, C. R¨ uegg, J. Larrea J., A. M. L¨ auchli, C. Panagopoulos, S. S. Saxena, M. Ellerby, D. F. McMorrow, T. Str¨ assle, S. Klotz, G. Hamel, R. A. Sadykov, V. Pomjakushin, M. Boehm, M. Jim´ enez- Ruiz, A. Schneidewind, E. Pomjakushina, M. Stin- gaciu, K. Conder, and H. M. Rønnow, 4-spin plaque- tte singlet state in the Shastry–Sutherland compound...

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    J. Guo, G. Sun, B. Zhao, L. Wang, W. Hong, V. A. Sidorov, N. Ma, Q. Wu, S. Li, Z. Y. Meng, A. W. Sand- vik, and L. Sun, Quantum Phases of SrCu 2(BO3)2 from High-Pressure Thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 206602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [30]

    T. Hong, T. Ying, Q. Huang, S. E. Dissanayake, Y. Qiu, M. M. Turnbull, A. A. Podlesnyak, Y. Wu, H. Cao, Y. Liu, I. Umehara, J. Gouchi, Y. Uwatoko, M. Mat- suda, D. A. Tennant, G.-W. Chern, K. P. Schmidt, and S. Wessel, Evidence for pressure induced unconventional quantum criticality in the coupled spin ladder antifer- romagnet C9H18N2CuBr4 , Nature Commun...

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Y. Cui, L. Liu, H. Lin, K.-H. Wu, W. Hong, X. Liu, C. Li, Z. Hu, N. Xi, S. Li, R. Yu, A. W. Sandvik, and W. Yu, Proximate deconfined quantum critical point in SrCu2(BO3)2, Science380, 1179 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Moessner, S

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, and P. Chandra, Two- Dimensional Periodic Frustrated Ising Models in a Trans- verse Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 4457 (2000)

    work page 2000

  33. [33]

    Humeniuk, Quantum Monte Carlo study of long-range transverse-field Ising models on the triangular lattice, Phys

    S. Humeniuk, Quantum Monte Carlo study of long-range transverse-field Ising models on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B93, 104412 (2016)

    work page 2016

  34. [34]

    S. N. Saadatmand, S. D. Bartlett, and I. P. McCulloch, Phase diagram of the quantum Ising model with long- range interactions on an infinite-cylinder triangular lat- tice, Phys. Rev. B97, 155116 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Koziol, S

    J. Koziol, S. Fey, S. C. Kapfer, and K. P. Schmidt, Quantum criticality of the transverse-field Ising model with long-range interactions on triangular-lattice cylin- ders, Phys. Rev. B100, 144411 (2019)

    work page 2019

  36. [36]

    S. Fey, S. C. Kapfer, and K. P. Schmidt, Quantum Criti- cality of Two-Dimensional Quantum Magnets with Long- Range Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 017203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    S. Guo, J. Huang, J. Hu, and Z.-X. Li, Order by disorder and an emergent Kosterlitz-Thouless phase in a triangu- lar Rydberg array, Phys. Rev. A108, 053314 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011)

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Jiang and O

    S. Jiang and O. Motrunich, Ising ferromagnet to valence bond solid transition in a one-dimensional spin chain: Analogies to deconfined quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. B99, 075103 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Roberts, S

    B. Roberts, S. Jiang, and O. I. Motrunich, Deconfined quantum critical point in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B 99, 165143 (2019)

    work page 2019

  41. [41]

    Mudry, A

    C. Mudry, A. Furusaki, T. Morimoto, and T. Hikihara, Quantum phase transitions beyond Landau-Ginzburg theory in one-dimensional space revisited, Phys. Rev. B 99, 205153 (2019)

    work page 2019

  42. [42]

    Huang, D.-C

    R.-Z. Huang, D.-C. Lu, Y.-Z. You, Z. Y. Meng, and T. Xi- ang, Emergent symmetry and conserved current at a one- 7 dimensional incarnation of deconfined quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. B100, 125137 (2019)

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    Zhang and M

    C. Zhang and M. Levin, Exactly Solvable Model for a Deconfined Quantum Critical Point in 1D, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 026801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    J. Y. Lee, J. Ramette, M. A. Metlitski, V. Vuleti´ c, W. W. Ho, and S. Choi, Landau-Forbidden Quantum Criticality in Rydberg Quantum Simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 083601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  45. [45]

    Romen, S

    A. Romen, S. Birnkammer, and M. Knap, Deconfined quantum criticality in the long-range, anisotropic Heisen- berg chain, SciPost Phys. Core7, 008 (2024)

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Baldelli, C

    N. Baldelli, C. R. Cabrera, S. Juli` a-Farr´ e, M. Aidels- burger, and L. Barbiero, Frustrated Extended Bose- Hubbard Model and Deconfined Quantum Critical Points with Optical Lattices at the Antimagic Wavelength, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 153401 (2024)

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    See Supplemental Material for further details on the ef- fective field theory and the DMRG numerics, including a discussion on the interaction tails and the role of the driving field

    work page

  48. [48]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2004, P06002 (2004)

    work page 2004

  49. [49]

    Tagliacozzo, T

    L. Tagliacozzo, T. R. de Oliveira, S. Iblisdir, and J. I. La- torre, Scaling of entanglement support for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B78, 024410 (2008)

    work page 2008

  50. [50]

    Pollmann, S

    F. Pollmann, S. Mukerjee, A. M. Turner, and J. E. Moore, Theory of Finite-Entanglement Scaling at One- Dimensional Quantum Critical Points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 255701 (2009)

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    Huang and S

    R.-Z. Huang and S. Yin, Kibble-Zurek mechanism for a one-dimensional incarnation of a deconfined quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023175 (2020)

    work page 2020

  52. [52]

    Hauschild, J

    J. Hauschild, J. Unfried, S. Anand, B. Andrews, M. Bintz, U. Borla, S. Divic, M. Drescher, J. Geiger, M. Hefel, K. H´ emery, W. Kadow, J. Kemp, N. Kirchner, V. S. Liu, G. M¨ oller, D. Parker, M. Rader, A. Romen, S. Scalet, L. Schoonderwoerd, M. Schulz, T. Soejima, P. Thoma, Y. Wu, P. Zechmann, L. Zweng, R. S. K. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, and F. Pollmann, Tenso...

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    Matsuo and K

    H. Matsuo and K. Nomura, Berezin- skii–Kosterlitz–Thouless transitions in the six-state clock model, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General39, 2953 (2006)

    work page 2006

  54. [54]

    Prakash and N

    A. Prakash and N. G. Jones, Classical Origins of Landau- Incompatible Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 097103 (2025)

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Di Francesco, P

    P. Di Francesco, P. Mathieu, and D. S´ en´ echal,Conformal field theory(Springer, New York, NY, 1997)

    work page 1997

  56. [56]

    Li, L.-P

    Z.-Q. Li, L.-P. Yang, Z. Y. Xie, H.-H. Tu, H.-J. Liao, and T. Xiang, Critical properties of the two-dimensional q-state clock model, Phys. Rev. E101, 060105 (2020)

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    Delfino and G

    G. Delfino and G. Mussardo, Non-integrable aspects of the multi-frequency sine-Gordon model, Nuclear Physics B516, 675 (1998)

    work page 1998

  58. [58]

    Deconfined quantum criticality on a triangular Rydberg array

    Z. Zhou, Z. Yan, C. Liu, Y. Chen, and X.-F. Zhang, Quantum Simulation of Two-Dimensional U(1) Gauge Theory in Rydberg and Rydberg-Dressed Atom Arrays, Chinese Physics Letters42, 053705 (2025). 8 Supplemental Material to “Deconfined quantum criticality on a triangular Rydberg array” In this Supplementary Material, we provide additional details supporting t...

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Effective 1D model 9

    work page

  60. [60]

    Prediction of the marginal probabilities distributions 11 II

    Critical exponents 11 D. Prediction of the marginal probabilities distributions 11 II. Further details on the numerics on cylinders 11 A. Computational methods 12 B. Critical exponents derived from the numerics 12 C. Finite size scaling 13 D. Sampling of the wavefunction on open cylinders and marginal probability distributions 13 E. Including the interact...

    work page

  61. [61]

    (S5) to a effective 1D theory

    Effective 1D model We now perform a dimensional reduction of the 2D field theory in Eq. (S5) to a effective 1D theory. Specifi- cally, for a small cylinder circumferencely, we assume the system is translationally invariant along they-direction [ϕ(τ, x, y)→ϕ(τ, x)], and we obtain the effective 1D ac- 10 FIG. S1. Phase diagram and phase transitions for the ...

    work page

  62. [62]

    (S8) can be understood by analyzing the renormaliza- tion group (RG) flow of the perturbative terms [53]

    Phase diagram The phase diagram of the effective 1D model in Eq. (S8) can be understood by analyzing the renormaliza- tion group (RG) flow of the perturbative terms [53]. The scaling dimension of a general operatorO m,n =e inϕeimΘ is given by [51] xm,n = 1 4 m2 K ′ +n 2K ′ .(S9) In particular, the scaling dimensions of cos (3ϕ), cos (6ϕ), and cos (2πΘ) ar...

    work page

  63. [63]

    The phase transitions at the boundaries of this intermediate phase belong to the Ising universality class [52]

    It is a first-order transition forg ′ 6 <0, while an intermediate phase withZ 6 symmetry arises forg ′ 6 >0. The phase transitions at the boundaries of this intermediate phase belong to the Ising universality class [52]. We note that in this regime of smallK ′, the dimensional reduction may break down, and the effective 1D field theory [Eq. (S6)] may no l...

    work page

  64. [64]

    Here, we can express the critical exponents only in terms of the scaling dimensionx 3 of the perturbation cos (3ϕ) in Eq

    Critical exponents Let us focus on the region 2/9< K ′ <8/9, where cos (3ϕ) is relevant and cos (6ϕ) is irrelevant. Here, we can express the critical exponents only in terms of the scaling dimensionx 3 of the perturbation cos (3ϕ) in Eq. (S6). At the critical point, whereg ′ 3 = 0, the two- point correlation function for the operatorψ n =ρ 0einϕ(x) betwee...

    work page 2000