Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 48 references

Planons and their Carroll-Galilei symmetries

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Planon dynamics is governed by a centrally extended symmetry group, and the massless Galilei orbits carry the physics.

desk verdict Promising paper on planon symmetries, but the orbit-method completeness needs proof; deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.08390 v1 pith:IILEJVPH submitted 2025-08-11 hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath.RT

José Figueroa-O'Farrill , Simon Pekar , Alfredo Pérez , Stefan Prohazka This is my paper
classification hep-thcond-mat.str-elmath.RT MSC 22E7081R05
keywords planonsCarrollsymmetryGalileicoadjointorbitsunitaryirreduciblerepresentationscentralextensiondipolescrystals
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that particles restricted to move in a plane—planons—are governed by a centrally extended symmetry group, and that the complete set of their states can be obtained by classifying the coadjoint orbits and unitary irreducible representations of that group. A striking consequence is that the massless coadjoint orbits of the Galilei group, which are usually disregarded, are exactly the orbits that describe planons, giving these orbits a physical meaning for the first time. The same construction yields classical and quantum dipoles as bound states of planon monopoles, with the planar confinement emerging from a mixed Carroll-Galilei symmetry. Finally, the paper identifies crystals as the simplest experimental systems that realize Carroll symmetry, providing a concrete arena for these ideas.

What carries the argument

The centrally extended planon group—a symmetry group combining Carroll and Galilei transformations with a central extension—is the central object. Its coadjoint orbits and their corresponding unitary irreducible representations are the classification machinery that enumerates planon states, with the massless Galilei coadjoint orbits as the key ingredient carrying the physical interpretation.

What would settle it

Compute the spectrum of the quantum dipole built from two planon monopoles as described in the paper. If the energy levels and degeneracies disagree with those predicted by the coadjoint orbit classification of the centrally extended planon group, the central claim would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The centrally extended planon group's coadjoint orbits and unitary irreducible representations classify planon dynamics. In this classification, the massless coadjoint orbits of the Galilei group play the central role, so they are no longer an algebraic curiosity but carry the physical states of plane-confined particles. The paper further constructs dipoles as bound states of monopoles, where the planar restriction is generated by a mixed Carroll-Galilei symmetry, and argues that crystals are the simplest physically realized Carroll-symmetric systems.

Load-bearing premise

The classification is only as good as the orbit method's correspondence between coadjoint orbits and unitary irreducible representations of the centrally extended planon group; if that correspondence is incomplete, the classification will miss physical planon states.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every possible planon state corresponds to a coadjoint orbit (or unitary irreducible representation) of the centrally extended planon group, so planon spectra are exactly the representation-theoretic ones.
  • Massless coadjoint orbits of the Galilei group are physically meaningful and must be included in any Galilean representation analysis involving planar restriction.
  • Dipoles built from monopoles inherit the mixed Carroll-Galilei symmetry, predicting a specific bound-state spectrum that can be compared with experiment.
  • Crystals provide a testbed for Carroll symmetry, so condensed-matter experiments can probe the predictions of this classification.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the orbit-method classification is complete, then any experimentally observed planar-restricted particle's quantum states must be labeled by these orbits; observing an extra label would point to a larger symmetry group or a breakdown of the orbit method.
  • The identification of crystals with Carroll symmetry may allow phonon spectra in certain crystals to be reinterpreted as Carroll representations, potentially simplifying their description.
  • The massless Galilei orbits acquiring physical meaning suggests a dual description in which planar-restricted dynamics is equivalent to massless Galilean dynamics, which could be tested by comparing response functions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies planons — particles whose mobility is confined to a plane — by classifying coadjoint orbits and unitary irreducible representations (UIRs) of a centrally extended 'planon group', a symmetry group with a mixed Carroll–Galilei structure. The abstract claims that the often-neglected massless coadjoint orbits of the Galilei group acquire a physical interpretation in this setting, and that classical and quantum dipoles can be constructed as bound states of monopoles. It also suggests that the simplest experimentally realized Carroll-symmetric systems are crystals. The technical core is representation-theoretic: coadjoint-orbit classification is used as the route to the unitary dual, and the massless orbits are argued to be physically meaningful for planar-restricted particles.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper would supply a representation-theoretic classification of a class of planar-restricted particles and a new physical role for previously sidelined Galilei coadjoint orbits. The connection between Carroll/Galilei symmetries and crystalline systems could also be of interest to condensed-matter and effective-field-theory audiences. The abstract promises a parameter-free structural derivation, which is attractive. However, the significance is entirely conditional on the full orbit-method analysis, the explicit construction of the centrally extended planon group, and the bound-state calculations, none of which are visible at the abstract level.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim — 'classification of coadjoint orbits and unitary irreducible representations of the centrally extended planon group' — presupposes that the orbit method gives a complete bijection for this group. For semidirect-product groups, Kirillov's orbit method is fully valid only under regularity conditions such as type I or Mackey regularity, and massless orbits of Galilei-type groups are precisely the cases that can be problematic. The abstract neither states nor signals a proof of this correspondence. Since the completeness of the UIR classification is load-bearing for the paper's main claim, this omission is a substantive concern.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that the massless coadjoint orbits of the Galilei group 'play a central rôle' and 'provide a nontrivial physical interpretation' of these orbits. But no definition of the planon group, no orbit equations, and no observable/physical-map construction are provided in the reviewed material. Without a concrete dictionary between coadjoint orbits and particle states (e.g., Casimir invariants, spin, energy-momentum relations), the interpretive claim cannot be checked.
  3. [Abstract] The construction of 'classical and quantum dipoles as bound states of monopoles' is stated as a result, but the abstract does not outline the Hamiltonian, the constraint mechanism that produces planar motion, or the quantization procedure. As a second central pillar of the paper, this is currently unsupported in the material available for review.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract does not state the dimension of the planon group or its explicit Lie-algebra structure; a few equations or group commutation relations in the introduction would help orient the reader.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'the simplest and already experimentally realised systems with Carroll symmetry are in crystals' is intriguing but vague; it would benefit from a reference or a one-sentence justification even in the abstract.
  3. [Abstract] The accent in 'rôle' is a stylistic choice; consider consistency with the journal's orthography.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable from the available text; abstract-level claims rest on standard external frameworks (orbit method, representation theory), not on self-referential construction.

full rationale

The only manuscript text provided is the abstract. The claims are (1) a classification of coadjoint orbits and unitary irreducible representations of the centrally extended planon group, (2) a physical interpretation of massless Galilei coadjoint orbits, (3) construction of dipoles as bound states of monopoles, and (4) an observation about Carroll symmetry in crystals. None of these, as stated, involves fitting a parameter and then calling it a prediction, defining the target in terms of itself, or relying on a load-bearing self-citation. The orbit method is an external, standard mathematical framework; whether it is fully justified for the planon group is a question of support and correctness, not circularity. The skeptic's concern about type-I status and orbit-method surjectivity identifies a possible gap in justification, but an unverified external hypothesis does not make the argument circular. Under hard rule 1, a circularity finding requires a quoted equation or construction showing that a result reduces to its own input; no such evidence exists in the available text. Therefore the honest non-finding is score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented physical entities are visible from the abstract. The central assumptions are the validity of the orbit method for the planon group and the identification of planons with that group's representations. A full-text audit might reveal additional ad hoc constructions, especially around the mixed Carroll-Galilei symmetry.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The orbit method maps coadjoint orbits to unitary irreducible representations for the centrally extended planon group.
    The abstract states the analysis proceeds via classification of coadjoint orbits and unirreps. This correspondence is not valid automatically for every Lie group, and if it fails the classification may not describe physical planons.
  • domain assumption Planons are correctly described by the centrally extended planon group.
    The physical interpretation of the representation theory depends on this identification, which is asserted rather than derived in the abstract.
  • standard math Standard background in central extensions, unitary representation theory, and Lie algebra cohomology is used.
    Implicit in the method; treated as established framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Planons and their Carroll-Galilei symmetries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IILEJVPH

@misc{pith2026250808390,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Planons and their Carroll-Galilei symmetries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IILEJVPH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.08390}
}
read the original abstract

We study the dynamics of planons, particles whose mobility is restricted to a plane, through the classification of coadjoint orbits and unitary irreducible representations of the centrally extended planon group. Planons are closely related to Galilei/Bargmann symmetries and, remarkably, the often-ignored massless coadjoint orbits of the Galilei group play a central r\^ole in their description. We thereby provide a nontrivial physical interpretation of these orbits. We further construct classical and quantum dipoles as bound states of monopoles, where the restricted planar motion arises from a novel mixed Carroll-Galilei symmetry. We also argue that the simplest and already experimentally realised systems with Carroll symmetry are in crystals.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. M. Figueroa-O'Farrill, S. Pekar, A. P\'erez, and S. Prohazka, `` Galilei particles revisited ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2401.03241 arXiv:2401.03241 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  2. [2]

    Bargmann, `` On Unitary ray representations of continuous groups ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1969831 Annals Math

    V. Bargmann, `` On Unitary ray representations of continuous groups ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1969831 Annals Math. 59 (1954) 1--46

    doi:10.2307/1969831 1954

  3. [3]

    Duval, Z

    C. Duval, Z. Horvath, and P. Horvathy, `` Geometrical spinoptics and the optical Hall effect ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2006.07.003 J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007) 925--941 , http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0509031 arXiv:math-ph/0509031

    arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    R. M. Nandkishore and M. Hermele, `` Fractons ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031218-013604 Ann. Rev. Condensed Matter Phys. 10 (2019) 295--313 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1803.11196 arXiv:1803.11196 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2019

  5. [5]

    Pretko, X

    M. Pretko, X. Chen, and Y. You, `` Fracton Phases of Matter ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X20300033 Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 no. 06, (2020) 2030003 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.01722 arXiv:2001.01722 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    K. T. Grosvenor, C. Hoyos, F. Pe\ na Benitez, and P. Sur\'owka, `` Space-Dependent Symmetries and Fractons ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.792621 Front. in Phys. 9 (2022) 792621 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00531 arXiv:2112.00531 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Fracton Matter

    A. Gromov and L. Radzihovsky, `` Fracton Matter ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05130 arXiv:2211.05130 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    Pretko and L

    M. Pretko and L. Radzihovsky, `` Fracton-Elasticity Duality ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.195301 Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 19, (2018) 195301 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11044 arXiv:1711.11044 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    Duval, G

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy, `` Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/9/092001 Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 092001 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.5894 arXiv:1402.5894 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Donnay, A

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, `` Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.071602 Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 7, (2022) 071602 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.04702 arXiv:2202.04702 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bagchi, S

    A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu, and S. Dutta, `` Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.241601 Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 24, (2022) 241601 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.08438 arXiv:2202.08438 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Figueroa-O'Farrill, E

    J. Figueroa-O'Farrill, E. Have, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, `` Carrollian and celestial spaces at infinity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2022)007 JHEP 09 (2022) 007 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03319 arXiv:2112.03319 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    E. Have, K. Nguyen, S. Prohazka, and J. Salzer, `` Massive carrollian fields at timelike infinity ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2024)054 JHEP 07 (2024) 054 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05190 arXiv:2402.05190 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Brauner, S

    T. Brauner, S. A. Hartnoll, P. Kovtun, H. Liu, M. Mezei, A. Nicolis, R. Penco, S.-H. Shao, and D. T. Son, `` Snowmass White Paper: Effective Field Theories for Condensed Matter Systems ,'' in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study . 3, 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.10110 arXiv:2203.1011...

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Cordova, T

    C. Cordova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, and S.-H. Shao, `` Snowmass White Paper: Generalized Symmetries in Quantum Field Theory and Beyond ,'' in 2022 Snowmass Summer Study . 5, 2022. http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.09545 arXiv:2205.09545 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Gromov, `` Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031035 Phys

    A. Gromov, `` Towards classification of Fracton phases: the multipole algebra ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.9.031035 Phys. Rev. X 9 no. 3, (2019) 031035 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.05104 arXiv:1812.05104 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Bidussi, J

    L. Bidussi, J. Hartong, E. Have, J. Musaeus, and S. Prohazka, `` Fractons, dipole symmetries and curved spacetime ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.6.205 SciPost Phys. 12 no. 6, (2022) 205 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03668 arXiv:2111.03668 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Jain and K

    A. Jain and K. Jensen, `` Fractons in curved space ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.12.4.142 SciPost Phys. 12 no. 4, (2022) 142 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2111.03973 arXiv:2111.03973 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Duval, G

    C. Duval, G. Gibbons, P. Horvathy, and P. Zhang, `` Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/8/085016 Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 085016 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1402.0657 arXiv:1402.0657 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Bergshoeff, J

    E. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis, and G. Longhi, `` Dynamics of Carroll Particles ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/20/205009 Class. Quant. Grav. 31 no. 20, (2014) 205009 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1405.2264 arXiv:1405.2264 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Figueroa-O'Farrill, A

    J. Figueroa-O'Farrill, A. P\'erez, and S. Prohazka, `` Carroll/fracton particles and their correspondence ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP06(2023)207 JHEP 06 (5, 2023) 207 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.06730 arXiv:2305.06730 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    P\'erez, S

    A. P\'erez, S. Prohazka, and A. Seraj, `` Fracton infrared triangle ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.021603 Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 no. 2, (2024) 021603 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16683 arXiv:2310.16683 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Pretko, `` Generalized Electromagnetism of Subdimensional Particles: A Spin Liquid Story ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035119 Phys

    M. Pretko, `` Generalized Electromagnetism of Subdimensional Particles: A Spin Liquid Story ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035119 Phys. Rev. B 96 no. 3, (2017) 035119 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1606.08857 arXiv:1606.08857 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2017 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Kumar and A

    A. Kumar and A. C. Potter, ``Symmetry-enforced fractonicity and two-dimensional quantum crystal melting,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.100.045119 Physical Review B 100 no. 4, (July, 2019) , http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.05621 arXiv:1808.05621 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Pretko, Z

    M. Pretko, Z. Zhai, and L. Radzihovsky, `` Crystal-to-Fracton Tensor Gauge Theory Dualities ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.134113 Phys. Rev. B 100 no. 13, (2019) 134113 , http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.12577 arXiv:1907.12577 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2019 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Figueroa-O'Farrill, A

    J. Figueroa-O'Farrill, A. P\'erez, and S. Prohazka, `` Quantum Carroll/fracton particles ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2023)041 JHEP 10 (2023) 041 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.05674 arXiv:2307.05674 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [27]

    J. H. Rawnsley, ``Representations of a semi-direct product by quantization,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100051793 Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 78 no. 2, (1975) 345--350

    1975 doi

  20. [28]

    Souriau, Structure des syst\`emes dynamiques

    J.-M. Souriau, Structure des syst\`emes dynamiques . Dunod, Paris, 1970. Ma\^ trises de math\' e matiques

    1970

  21. [29]

    Morand, `` Possible ambient kinematics ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159556 J

    K. Morand, `` Possible ambient kinematics ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0159556 J. Math. Phys. 64 no. 11, (2023) 112502 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.14371 arXiv:2305.14371 [physics.gen-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Oblak, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61878-4 BMS Particles in Three Dimensions

    B. Oblak, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61878-4 BMS Particles in Three Dimensions . PhD thesis, Brussels U., 2016. http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.08526 arXiv:1610.08526 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Barnich, K

    G. Barnich, K. Nguyen, and R. Ruzziconi, `` Geometric action for extended Bondi-Metzner-Sachs group in four dimensions ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP12(2022)154 JHEP 12 (2022) 154 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.07592 arXiv:2211.07592 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Basile, E

    T. Basile, E. Joung, and T. Oh, `` Manifestly covariant worldline actions from coadjoint orbits. Part I. Generalities and vectorial descriptions ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP01(2024)018 JHEP 01 (2024) 018 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.13644 arXiv:2307.13644 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    I. A. Lahlali and J. A. O'Connor, `` Coset symmetries and coadjoint orbits ,'' 11, 2024. http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05918 arXiv:2411.05918 [hep-th]

    2024

  26. [34]

    Barnich and T

    G. Barnich and T. Smoes, `` Model spaces as constrained Hamiltonian systems: I. Application to SU(2) ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.20267 arXiv:2502.20267 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  27. [35]

    de Boer, J

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, `` Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.810405 Front. in Phys. 10 (2022) 810405 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2110.02319 arXiv:2110.02319 [hep-th]

    2022

  28. [36]

    Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics

    D. Griffiths, Introduction to Electrodynamics . Prentice Hall, 1999

    1999

  29. [37]

    A. O. Barut and R. R a czka, Theory of group representations and applications . PWN---Polish Scientific Publishers, Warsaw, 1977

    1977

  30. [38]

    Bertolini and N

    E. Bertolini and N. Maggiore, `` Maxwell theory of fractons ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.125008 Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 12, (2022) 125008 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2209.01485 arXiv:2209.01485 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  31. [39]

    S. A. Baig, J. Distler, A. Karch, A. Raz, and H.-Y. Sun, `` Spacetime Subsystem Symmetries ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.15590 arXiv:2303.15590 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Kasikci, M

    O. Kasikci, M. Ozkan, and Y. Pang, `` Carrollian origin of spacetime subsystem symmetry ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.045020 Phys. Rev. D 108 no. 4, (2023) 045020 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.11331 arXiv:2304.11331 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    M. M. Ahmadi-Jahmani and A. Parvizi, `` Fracton and Non-Lorentzian Particle Duality: Gauge Field Couplings and Geometric Implications ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.21660 arXiv:2503.21660 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    E. A. Bergshoeff, G. Giorgi, J. Rosseel, and P. Salgado-Rebolledo, `` A conformal approach to matter coupled Aristotelian gravity ,'' http://arxiv.org/abs/2507.16943 arXiv:2507.16943 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  35. [43]

    Figueroa-O'Farrill, R

    J. Figueroa-O'Farrill, R. Grassie, and S. Prohazka, `` Lifshitz symmetry: Lie algebras, spacetimes and particles ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.14.3.035 SciPost Phys. 14 (2023) 035 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11806 arXiv:2206.11806 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [44]

    P\'erez and S

    A. P\'erez and S. Prohazka, `` Asymptotic symmetries and soft charges of fractons ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.106.044017 Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 4, (2022) 044017 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2203.02817 arXiv:2203.02817 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger, Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory . Princeton University Press, 2018. http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05448 arXiv:1703.05448 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Tsaloukidis and P

    L. Tsaloukidis and P. Sur \'o wka, `` Elastic Li \'e nard-Wiechert potentials of dynamical dislocations from tensor gauge theory in 2+1 dimensions ,'' http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.109.104118 Phys. Rev. B 109 no. 10, (2024) 104118 , http://arxiv.org/abs/2302.14092 arXiv:2...

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Hull and D

    D. Hull and D. Bacon, Introduction to Dislocations . Butterworth-Heinemann, 2011

    2011

  40. [48]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.