Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Opening Musical Creativity? Embedded Ideologies in Generative-AI Music Systems

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read AI music's 'democratization' is a shared ideology, study finds

desk verdict A useful map of GenAI-music democratization rhetoric, but the 'total ideology' claim is undercut by selection on the dependent variable in both system choice and Discord keyword searches. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.08805 v1 pith:RYT64I6L submitted 2025-08-12 cs.SD cs.AIcs.HC

Liam Pram , Fabio Morreale This is my paper
classification cs.SDcs.AIcs.HC
keywords generativeAImusicideologydemocratizationtechno-liberalismtotaltechnologydiscourseanalysiscommunityethnography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies four public generative-AI music systems — AIVA, Stable Audio, Suno, and Udio — and argues that their marketing and their users' online discussions express the same worldview: an individualist, globalist, techno-liberal ideology that treats AI in music as inevitable and democratizing while evading ethical responsibility. Using the authors' own hands-on use, company statements, and Discord community posts, it finds that both producers and consumers reproduce this framing. If the finding holds, the 'democratization' language of AI music is not neutral promotion but an ideology that quietly redefines music and musical creativity to fit what generative systems can deliver.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by a mixed-method triangulation: autoethnographic use of the four systems, a digital ethnography of company rhetoric, and a digital ethnography of Discord communities, all analyzed through inductive thematic analysis. The interpretive pivot is 'total ideology' — a holistic belief system that presents itself as a natural, unified historical process and recruits individuals into collective acceptance — together with the concept of governmentality, which explains how democratization rhetoric quietly guides users to self-manage as creative consumers rather than question the technology.

What would settle it

Sample a random week of posts from each of the four Discord servers without using the study's keyword filters, and code them for the four ideological components (individualist, globalist, techno-liberal, ethically evasive). If the components are scarce or scattered in the unfiltered stream, the 'total ideology' is an artifact of the keyword search; if they also appear in communities of specialized AI music tools that make no democratization claims, then democratization is not what carries the ideology.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that the makers and users of AIVA, Stable Audio, Suno, and Udio converge on a 'total ideology': a belief system that presents AI as a unified, inevitable historical stage, positions the individual creator-consumer at its center, and casts the companies as benevolent enablers of dormant human creativity. This ideology is individualist (creativity is a personal capacity the tool unlocks), globalist (its benefits and reach are framed as universal, erasing local contexts), techno-liberal (technology, not politics or regulation, will emancipate people), and ethically evasive (responsibility is diffused by inevitability and by anthropomorphizing the AI as a neutr

Load-bearing premise

The field-wide claim depends on the selected four systems (all chosen because they explicitly claim democratization) and on keyword-searched Discord posts standing in for the whole user base and the whole industry; if those filters created the apparent consensus, the 'total ideology' is not shared but induced by the research design.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the ideology is real, 'democratization' claims should be evaluated as ideological moves, not as measures of access; assessing only whether barriers fell will miss how the meaning of music-making changed.
  • Text-prompt interfaces make genre the main handle for describing music, steering creative novelty toward genre hybridity and away from other forms of musical difference.
  • The rhetoric of inevitability — AI as the next guitar or DAW — discourages users from resisting or demanding accountability, so regulatory and ethical interventions face entrenched social acceptance.
  • Because users and producers share and reproduce the same ideology, responsibility for its effects is genuinely distributed, complicating any simple 'blame the company' account.
  • Anthropomorphized 'AI assistant' language naturalizes the systems and makes their data-hungry, extractive operation harder to critique.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same ideological pattern likely shows up in other consumer GenAI creative tools (image, text, video), which would mean the 'total ideology' is a general mechanism of AI-era creative software, not a quirk of music.
  • A testable consequence: specialized AI music tools that do not claim democratization should show user communities with a weaker form of this worldview; if they show it anyway, democratization rhetoric is not the carrier.
  • The paper's keyword-based sampling could be checked by coding a random temporal slice of Discord posts rather than keyword hits; if the four ideological components mostly appear in posts containing words like 'democratize' or 'creativity,' the shared ideology may be partly an artifact of the search.
  • The ethical-evasiveness component predicts that when concrete harms are discussed (copyright suits, artist displacement), users will defuse them with inevitability or historical analogy; that is directly observable in existing threads.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper examines four generative-AI music systems available in mid-2025—AIVA, Stable Audio, Suno, and Udio—and investigates the ideologies embedded in their marketing, developer discourse, and user communities. Methodologically, it combines an autoethnographic engagement with the systems, a digital ethnography of company materials and spokesperson statements, and a digital ethnography of Discord communities, followed by inductive thematic analysis. The paper argues that producers and users share a coherent ideology that is individualist, globalist, techno-liberal, and ethically evasive, and that this constitutes a 'total ideology' which reframes musical creativity, assigns responsibility away from corporate actors, and naturalizes generative-AI music as inevitable. The paper positions itself as a critical intervention into the early-stage development and adoption of AI music systems.

Significance. The paper addresses an important and under-examined question: what political and ideological assumptions are built into commercial generative-AI music systems, and how are those assumptions reproduced in user discourse? Its triangulation of autoethnography, corporate rhetoric, and community data is valuable, and the theoretical apparatus—governmentality, techno-liberalism, and Gentile's 'total ideology'—is thought-provoking and relevant to critical AI and music studies. The authors are transparent about several methodological choices and limitations. If the empirical basis were strengthened, the paper could make a meaningful contribution to a growing critical literature. As it stands, however, the strength of the conclusions substantially exceeds what the data-collection and analysis protocol can support.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.2; §4.2.1] Criterion 4 in §3.2 requires each selected system to 'make explicit claims around democratization.' The finding in §4.2.1 that 'representatives of all the systems reviewed made some claims to democratization' is therefore partly an artifact of the inclusion criterion rather than an independent empirical result. This is load-bearing because the abstract and conclusion claim a 'shared ideology' across producers and consumers. The authors should either explicitly frame the study as a purposive case study of systems that already use democratization rhetoric, or provide evidence about the broader population of GenAI music systems. Without this, the central inference is at risk of circularity.
  2. [§3.4.2; §4.3] The consumer-side corpus was assembled using targeted Discord searches for terms that closely match the later themes: 'democratise'/'democratize', 'easy to use', 'musical creativity', 'creativity', 'musicianship', 'innovation', 'originality', 'future of music', 'experimentation', 'new music', 'AI as tool', 'assists', 'collaboration', and 'workflow'. The themes reported in §4.3—democratization and dormant ability, augmentation and assistance, innovation and creativity, techno-inevitability—map almost one-to-one onto these search terms. No search terms were designed to retrieve skepticism, fear, refusal, or resistance, and the paper reports no prevalence data (e.g., number of posts retrieved, proportion relevant, distribution across users) nor a codebook or audit trail. The analysis therefore shows that such discourse exists and is findable, but not that it is shared, typical, or dominant.
  3. [§5.1; n.17] The paper concedes in footnote 17 that democratization discourse had only 'minor presence or absence' in the AIVA and Stable Audio communities, and attributes this to low community engagement. This is difficult to reconcile with the central claim of a 'shared ideology' that is successfully disseminated between producers and consumers. At minimum, the claim must be restricted to the communities where positive evidence exists, and the status of low-engagement communities should be discussed as a boundary condition rather than glossed over in a footnote.
  4. [§5.2] The characterization of the mapped discourse as a 'total ideology' in Gentile's sense—holistic, aiming to eliminate disagreement, and requiring the formation of a 'new man'—goes beyond what the empirical material can support. The quoted statements are compatible with other, less loaded interpretations such as marketing rhetoric, user enthusiasm, or generic technological-framing discourse. The paper does not provide direct evidence of decontestation or totality, such as systematic channeling or suppression of dissent, evidence of belief change over time, or data on how dissonant voices are treated. The authors should either provide such evidence or soften the conclusion to 'ideological tendencies' or 'a dominant discursive pattern' rather than 'total ideology'.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] Spelling is inconsistent: 'Schulman' and 'Shulman' are both used (e.g., §5.1), and 'AIV A' appears with an errant space in many places. The headings 'T echno–liberal Perspectives' and 'T echno–Inevitability' also contain visible spacing artifacts.
  2. [References] Reference [66] gives a YouTube URL for the definition of 'democratization'; this appears to be a copy-paste error and should be replaced with the actual dictionary citation.
  3. [§3.4.2] The paragraph introducing the targeted searches says the company-level thematic analysis was used to generate 'a group of key themes' for community data collection, but those themes are not listed. Adding them would let readers audit the mapping between search terms and the later thematic categories.
  4. [§4.3] The paper does not report the volume of community data collected, the number of users represented, or the number of quotes per theme. Since prevalence is central to the 'shared' and 'total' claims, even basic descriptive counts would improve the interpretability of the analysis.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Selection on the dependent variable makes the 'shared ideology' and 'successful ideological dissemination' claims partly by construction.

  1. self definitional [Section 3.2, criterion 4]
    "An initial survey to find claims of creative democratization was used to establish whether these systems were engaged in the ideological space being mapped by this study."

    The inclusion criterion 'Makes explicit claims around democratization' selects exactly the systems that already use democratization rhetoric. Section 4.2.1's finding that 'Representatives of all the systems reviewed made some claims to democratization' is therefore an artifact of sampling, not an empirical discovery. The paper's broader inference of a field-wide 'shared ideology' is not licensed by this selection, because systems without such claims were excluded by design. This is circular in the sense that the outcome variable (democratization discourse) is used to define the sample.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.4.2]
    "The terms used for targeted searches were: • "democratise"/"democratize" • "easy to use" • "musical creativity" • "creativity" 1 Jun – 31 Aug • "musicianship" • "innovation" • "originality" 1 Aug – 31 Aug • "future of music" • "experimentation" 1 Jun – 31 Aug • "new music" • "AI as tool" • "assists" • "collaboration" • "workflow""

    The user-side corpus was assembled by searching for terms that nearly match the four themes later reported in Section 4.3 (democratization/dormant ability, augmentation/assistance, innovation/creativity, techno-inevitability). Searching for 'innovation', 'creativity', 'AI as tool', 'collaboration', etc., guarantees those themes appear; the protocol includes no searches for skepticism, resistance, fear, or rejection. Treating the resulting keyword-matching posts as evidence of what 'the communities' believe is selection on the dependent variable. The paper's claim that this demonstrates 'successful ideological dissemination' is therefore partly constructed by the search instrument.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Section 5.1]
    "We see the varying degrees to which these companies rhetoricize democratization reflected in the community engagement with the concept,17 evidence of successful ideological dissemination, regardless of intention."

    This sentence converts keyword-filtered community posts into evidence of ideological transmission. But because the community corpus was deliberately searched for the very terms that constitute the ideology (democratization, assistance, innovation, inevitability), the 'reflection' is built into the data-collection protocol. Footnote 17 concedes democratization discourse had only 'minor presence or absence' in AIVA and Stable Audio communities, undercutting the total-ideology claim. The inference from 'posts containing these terms exist' to 'companies successfully disseminated ideology to users' is not supported by the sampling design.

full rationale

The paper's qualitative analysis contains several independent components (autoethnographic engagement, company rhetoric, theoretical interpretation) and is transparent about its purposive design. However, the central claim of a shared 'total ideology' spanning producers and consumers is partially built into the sampling and search protocol. Systems were selected because they make explicit claims around democratization, and user posts were retrieved through keyword searches whose terms map almost one-to-one onto the reported user themes. Finding democratization discourse and 'AI as tool' rhetoric in such a corpus is a consequence of the inclusion criteria, not an independent confirmation. The same critique applies to the 'successful ideological dissemination' inference. The paper's own footnote 17 concedes weak presence of democratization discourse in two of the four communities. The autoethnography and theoretical framing provide some independent content, so the circularity is partial rather than total. Self-citations (e.g., Morreale et al.) are used as background theory, not as unique sources of the conclusion, and do not materially raise the score. Overall: 6.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters in the numeric sense; the paper's 'parameters' are selection criteria and interpretive commitments, which are listed as assumptions. The paper introduces no new entities, forces, or technical objects; its central construct 'total ideology' is borrowed from Gentile and applied as an analytical category.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Discord community posts are representative of the overall user base of each of the four systems.
    All user data are collected from Discord servers, which may over-represent enthusiastic or technically literate users; the paper generalizes to 'consumers' from this corpus (Section 3.4.2).
  • domain assumption Company representatives' public statements and marketing materials reliably express corporate ideology.
    The paper treats public rhetoric (X posts, YouTube interviews, blog posts) as evidence of the companies' actual ideological positions, though such statements are strategic communications (Sections 4.2 and 5.1).
  • domain assumption The authors' autoethnographic experiences are representative of typical user experiences with the systems.
    The autoethnography (Section 3.3) is based solely on the authors' own interactions and is not compared with data from a broader sample of users.
  • domain assumption The theoretical frameworks (Foucault's governmentality, Gentile's total ideologies, techno-liberalism) are appropriate lenses for interpreting the data.
    The analysis applies these frameworks, which shape what themes are 'found'; this assumption is not empirically testable from the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Opening Musical Creativity? Embedded Ideologies in Generative-AI Music Systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RYT64I6L

@misc{pith2026250808805,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Opening Musical Creativity? Embedded Ideologies in Generative-AI Music Systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RYT64I6L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.08805}
}
read the original abstract

AI systems for music generation are increasingly common and easy to use, granting people without any musical background the ability to create music. Because of this, generative-AI has been marketed and celebrated as a means of democratizing music making. However, inclusivity often functions as marketable rhetoric rather than a genuine guiding principle in these industry settings. In this paper, we look at four generative-AI music making systems available to the public as of mid-2025 (AIVA, Stable Audio, Suno, and Udio) and track how they are rhetoricized by their developers, and received by users. Our aim is to investigate ideologies that are driving the early-stage development and adoption of generative-AI in music making, with a particular focus on democratization. A combination of autoethnography and digital ethnography is used to examine patterns and incongruities in rhetoric when positioned against product functionality. The results are then collated to develop a nuanced, contextual discussion. The shared ideology we map between producers and consumers is individualist, globalist, techno-liberal, and ethically evasive. It is a 'total ideology' which obfuscates individual responsibility, and through which the nature of music and musical practice is transfigured to suit generative outcomes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.08805 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A flowchart representing the methodological form of the study [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Themes of focus for companies’ ethnography. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Finding the noise: Zero-shot AI Music Detection

    cs.SD 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A zero-shot method based on fakeprints, NMF and a blur-based reconstruction error detects unknown AI-music generators in one-class and clustering setups, working for most services but missing Mubert and pre-v9 Mureka.

  2. TechOps: Technical Documentation Templates for the AI Act

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    TechOps offers three lifecycle-tracking documentation templates (data, model, application) and shows, on three example AI systems, how they can be filled in to support EU AI Act compliance claims.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Instrumentals, from mind to music

    Suno [@sunomusic]. Instrumentals, from mind to music . X. Nov. 2024. url: https://x.com/sunomusic

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Introducing Udio, an app for music creation

    Udio [@udiomusic]. Introducing Udio, an app for music creation . X. Apr

    work page

  3. [3]

    Today, we’d like to share some thoughts on AI

    Udio [@udiomusic]. Today, we’d like to share some thoughts on AI . X. June 2024. url: https://x.com/udiomusic

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Stable Audio Named One of TIME’s Best Inventions of 2023

    Stability AI. Stable Audio Named One of TIME’s Best Inventions of 2023 . Stability AI. 2023. url: https://stability.ai/news/stable-audio- times-best-inventions-of-2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    AI performer bias: Listeners like music less when they think it was performed by an AI

    Alessandro Ansani et al. “AI performer bias: Listeners like music less when they think it was performed by an AI”. In: Empirical Studies of the Arts 43.2 (2025), pp. 1137–1161

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    Surrogate humanity: Race, robots, and the politics of technological futures

    Neda Atanasoski and Kalindi Vora. Surrogate humanity: Race, robots, and the politics of technological futures . Duke University Press, 2019

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Democratic eco-socialism as a real utopia: Transitioning to an alternative world system

    Hans A Baer. Democratic eco-socialism as a real utopia: Transitioning to an alternative world system . Berghahn Books, 2017. 20

    work page 2017

  8. [8]

    A tool for gener- ating controllable variations of musical themes using variational autoen- coders with latent space regularisation

    Berker Banar, Nick Bryan-Kinns, and Simon Colton. “A tool for gener- ating controllable variations of musical themes using variational autoen- coders with latent space regularisation”. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence . Vol. 37. 13. 2023, pp. 16401–16403

    work page 2023

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    Exploring how a generative AI interprets mu- sic

    Gabriela Barenboim et al. “Exploring how a generative AI interprets mu- sic”. In: Neural Computing and Applications 36.27 (2024), pp. 17007– 17022

    2024

  2. [10]

    How music AI is useful: engagements with composers, performers and audiences

    Oded Ben-Tal, Matthew Tobias Harris, and Bob LT Sturm. “How music AI is useful: engagements with composers, performers and audiences”. In: Leonardo 54.5 (2021), pp. 510–516

    2021

  3. [11]

    Towards Responsible AI Music: an Investi- gation of Trustworthy Features for Creative Systems

    Jacopo de Berardinis et al. “Towards Responsible AI Music: an Investi- gation of Trustworthy Features for Creative Systems”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.18814 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  4. [12]

    AI (r) evolution–where are we heading? Thoughts about the future of music and sound technologies in the era of deep learn- ing

    Giovanni Bindi et al. “AI (r) evolution–where are we heading? Thoughts about the future of music and sound technologies in the era of deep learn- ing”. In: arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.18320 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    AI and the Music Industry: Transforming Production, Platforms, and Practice

    Richard Boateng, Sheena Lovia Boateng, and Joseph Budu. AI and the Music Industry: Transforming Production, Platforms, and Practice . CRC Press, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    AI cheerleaders: Public relations, neoliberalism and artificial intelligence

    C Bourne. AI cheerleaders: Public relations, neoliberalism and artificial intelligence. Public Relations Inquiry, 8 (2), 109-125 . 2019

    2019

  7. [15]

    Mathematical music: from antiquity to music AI

    Nikita Braguinski. Mathematical music: from antiquity to music AI . Focal Press, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    Using thematic analysis in psychol- ogy

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. “Using thematic analysis in psychol- ogy”. In: Qualitative research in psychology 3.2 (2006), pp. 77–101

    2006

  9. [17]

    Introduction to Multimodal Generative AI

    R Brindha et al. “Introduction to Multimodal Generative AI”. In: Multi- modal Generative AI . Springer, 2025, pp. 1–36

    2025

  10. [18]

    An empire of artificial intelligence: exploring an intersection of politics, society, and creativity

    Debangana Chatterjee. “An empire of artificial intelligence: exploring an intersection of politics, society, and creativity”. In: International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 38.1 (2024), pp. 81–110

    2024

  11. [19]

    5 Q’s for Pierre Barreau, CEO of AIV A

    Eline Chivot. 5 Q’s for Pierre Barreau, CEO of AIV A. https://datainnovation. org / 2019 / 05 / 5qs - for - pierre - barreau - ceo - of - aiva/. Accessed: 2024-06-30. May 2019

    2019

  12. [20]

    Origins of algorithmic thinking in music

    Nick Collins. “Origins of algorithmic thinking in music”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Algorithmic Music. Ed. by Roger T. Dean and Alex McLean. Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 67–78

    2018

  13. [21]

    Action and Perception: Embodying Algorithms and the Extended Mind

    Palle Dahlstedt. “Action and Perception: Embodying Algorithms and the Extended Mind”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Algorithmic Music . Ed. by Roger T. Dean and Alex McLean. Oxford University Press, 2018, pp. 41– 66

    2018

  14. [22]

    MBP #144 Zach Evans

    Bill Day. MBP #144 Zach Evans . YouTube. Mar. 2024. url: https : //www.youtube.com/watch?v=av67oS0jt5M. 21

    2024

  15. [23]

    AI and the Democratization of Art Creation: Revolutionizing the Creative Landscape

    Myk Eff. AI and the Democratization of Art Creation: Revolutionizing the Creative Landscape . Medium. 2023. url: https : / / medium . com / higher- neurons/ai- and- the- democratization- of- art- creation- revolutionizing-the-creative-landscape-12c76a897561

    2023

  16. [24]

    The Company Leading the AI Music Revolution

    Jacob Effron. The Company Leading the AI Music Revolution . YouTube. May 2024. url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuZ0j7AtR0Q

    2024

  17. [25]

    AI and work in the creative industries: digital con- tinuity or discontinuity?

    Kristofer Erickson. “AI and work in the creative industries: digital con- tinuity or discontinuity?” In: Creative Industries Journal (2024), pp. 1– 21

    2024

  18. [26]

    Risk and harm: Unpacking ideologies in the AI discourse

    Gabriele Ferri and Inte Gloerich. “Risk and harm: Unpacking ideologies in the AI discourse”. In: Proceedings of the 5th International conference on Conversational User Interfaces . 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  19. [27]

    Generative ai

    Stefan Feuerriegel et al. “Generative ai”. In: Business & Information Sys- tems Engineering 66.1 (2024), pp. 111–126

    2024

  20. [28]

    Technoliberalism and the end of participatory culture in the United States

    Adam Fish. Technoliberalism and the end of participatory culture in the United States. Springer, 2017

    2017

  21. [29]

    The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality

    Michel Foucault. “The Foucault effect: studies in governmentality”. In: Harvester Wheatsheaf (1991)

    1991

  22. [30]

    The Subject and Power

    Michel Foucault. “The Subject and Power”. In: Michel Foucault: beyond structuralism and hermeneutics . Ed. by Hubert L. Dreyfus and Paul Ra- binow. University of Chicago Press, 1982, pp. 208–226

    1982

  23. [31]

    Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach

    Michael Freeden. Ideologies and political theory: A conceptual approach . Clarendon Press, 1996

    1996

  24. [32]

    Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration

    Fiona Fui-Hoon Nah et al. Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration . 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    What do we mean by GenAI? A systematic mapping of the evolution, trends, and techniques involved in Generative AI

    Francisco Jos´ e Garc ´ ıa-Pe˜ nalvo and Andrea V´ azquez-Ingelmo. “What do we mean by GenAI? A systematic mapping of the evolution, trends, and techniques involved in Generative AI”. In: IJIMAI 8.4 (2023), pp. 7–16

    2023

  26. [34]

    Total and Totalitarian Ideologies

    Emilio Gentile. “Total and Totalitarian Ideologies”. In: The Oxford Hand- book of Political Ideologies. Ed. by Michael Freeden and Marc Stears. Ox- ford University Press, 2013, pp. 56–72

    2013

  27. [35]

    Music and democracy in America: Historical perspectives on ‘democratization’in the digital age

    Nancy Weiss Hanrahan. “Music and democracy in America: Historical perspectives on ‘democratization’in the digital age”. In: The Cultural So- ciology of Art and Music: New Directions and New Discoveries . Springer, 2022, pp. 405–429

    2022

  28. [36]

    (Dis) locating democratization: Music tech- nologies in practice

    Paul Harkins and Nick Prior. “(Dis) locating democratization: Music tech- nologies in practice”. In: Popular Music and Society 45.1 (2022), pp. 84– 103

    2022

  29. [37]

    Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal gov- ernmentality

    Graham Haughton, Phil Allmendinger, and Stijn Oosterlynck. “Spaces of neoliberal experimentation: soft spaces, postpolitics, and neoliberal gov- ernmentality”. In: Environment and Planning a 45.1 (2013), pp. 217–234. 22

    2013

  30. [38]

    Leveraging AI in arts: a case study of music creating venture EnterArts

    Suk-Ki Hong and Hong-Hee Lee. “Leveraging AI in arts: a case study of music creating venture EnterArts”. In: Service Business 19.2 (2025), pp. 1–16

    2025

  31. [39]

    AI Art and its Impact on Artists

    Harry H Jiang et al. “AI Art and its Impact on Artists”. In: Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society . 2023, pp. 363–374

    2023

  32. [40]

    A standardised procedure for evaluating creative sys- tems: Computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be cre- ative

    Anna Jordanous. “A standardised procedure for evaluating creative sys- tems: Computational creativity evaluation based on what it is to be cre- ative”. In: Cognitive Computation 4.3 (2012), pp. 246–279

    2012

  33. [41]

    Code/space: Software and everyday life

    Rob Kitchin and Martin Dodge. Code/space: Software and everyday life . Mit Press, 2011

    2011

  34. [42]

    Pierre Barreau Explains How Aiva Uses Deep Learning to Make Music

    Noah Kravitz. Pierre Barreau Explains How Aiva Uses Deep Learning to Make Music . Soundcloud. Aug. 2017. url: https://soundcloud.com/ theaipodcast/ep-34

    2017

  35. [43]

    Exploring the Needs of Practising Musicians in Co-Creative AI Through Co-Design

    Stephen James Krol, Maria Teresa Llano Rodriguez, and Miguel J Loor Paredes. “Exploring the Needs of Practising Musicians in Co-Creative AI Through Co-Design”. In: Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 2025, pp. 1–13

    2025

  36. [44]

    How AI Is Democratizing Creativity

    Andrew Louder. How AI Is Democratizing Creativity . LouderAI. 2024. url: https : / / louderai . com / louderai - insights / democratizing - creativity

    2024

  37. [45]

    Pierre Barreau on the future of AI in the music industry

    LUX. Pierre Barreau on the future of AI in the music industry . Accessed: 2024-11-19. url: https://www.lux-mag.com/pierre-barreau-on-the- future-of-ai-in-the-music-industry/

    2024

  38. [46]

    A Future of Music Tech

    Thor Magnusson. A Future of Music Tech. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2019, pp. 292–302

    2019

  39. [47]

    Generative AI Is Revolutionizing Music: The Vision For Democratizing Creation

    Bernard Marr. Generative AI Is Revolutionizing Music: The Vision For Democratizing Creation. Forbes. 2023. url: https://www.forbes.com/ sites/bernardmarr/2023/10/05/generative-ai-is-revolutionizing- music-loudlys-vision-for-democratizing-creation/

    2023

  40. [48]

    Composing by hacking: Technology ap- propriation as a pedagogical tool for electronic music

    Raul Masu and Fabio Morreale. “Composing by hacking: Technology ap- propriation as a pedagogical tool for electronic music”. In: Teaching Elec- tronic Music. Routledge, 2021, pp. 157–171

    2021

  41. [49]

    The o in nime: Reflecting on the importance of reusing and repurposing old musical instruments

    Raul Masu, Fabio Morreale, and Alexander Refsum Jensenius. “The o in nime: Reflecting on the importance of reusing and repurposing old musical instruments”. In: Proceedings of the international conference on new interfaces for musical expression . 2023, pp. 106–115

    2023

  42. [50]

    It‘s All About Speed: AI‘s Impact on Workflow in Music Production

    Finn McClellan and Fabio Morreale. “It‘s All About Speed: AI‘s Impact on Workflow in Music Production”. In: Proceedings of the AES International Conference on Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence for Audio . 2025. 23

    2025

  43. [51]

    Musical Instruments for Novices: Compar- ing NIME, HCI and Crowdfunding Approaches

    Andrew McPherson et al. “Musical Instruments for Novices: Compar- ing NIME, HCI and Crowdfunding Approaches”. eng. In: New Directions in Music and Human-Computer Interaction . Springer Series on Cultural Computing. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG, 2019, pp. 179–

    2019

  44. [52]

    Music for All: Representational Bias and Cross- Cultural Adaptability of Music Generation Models

    Atharva Mehta et al. “Music for All: Representational Bias and Cross- Cultural Adaptability of Music Generation Models”. eng. In:arXiv (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Mikey Shulman: Suno and the Sound of AI Music

    Michael Mignano. Mikey Shulman: Suno and the Sound of AI Music . YouTube. Mar. 2024. url: https : / / www . youtube . com / watch ? v = ArynrUmFacM

    2024

  46. [54]

    Where Does the Buck Stop? Ethical and Political Issues with AI in Music Creation

    Fabio Morreale. “Where Does the Buck Stop? Ethical and Political Issues with AI in Music Creation”. eng. In: Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval 4.1 (2021), pp. 105–113. issn: 2514-3298

    2021

  47. [55]

    Data Collection in Music Generation Training Sets: A Critical Analysis

    Fabio Morreale, Megha Sharma, and I-Chieh Wei. “Data Collection in Music Generation Training Sets: A Critical Analysis”. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (Milan, Italy). 2023

    2023

  48. [56]

    A NIME Of The Times: Developing an Outward- Looking Political Agenda For This Community

    Fabio Morreale et al. “A NIME Of The Times: Developing an Outward- Looking Political Agenda For This Community”. In:Proceedings of the In- ternational Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (Birm- ingham, UK). June 2020, pp. 160–165. url: https://doi.org/10.5281/ ...

    2020

  49. [57]

    Reductive, Exclusionary, Normalising: The Limits of Generative AI Music

    Fabio Morreale et al. “Reductive, Exclusionary, Normalising: The Limits of Generative AI Music”. In: Forthcoming (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Future of Creativity: Mikey Shulman (Suno) & Anna Veronika Dorogush (Recraft) with James Wilsterman

    Newcomer. Future of Creativity: Mikey Shulman (Suno) & Anna Veronika Dorogush (Recraft) with James Wilsterman . YouTube. July 2024. url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBf50fpW_8Y

    2024

  51. [59]

    Suno AI Generates Beautiful Songs with Oracle Cloud

    Oracle. Suno AI Generates Beautiful Songs with Oracle Cloud . YouTube. Feb. 2025. url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aKlIQiS8MLc

    2025

  52. [60]

    L’homme r´ eg´ en´ er´ e: Essais sur la R´ evolution fran¸ caise

    Mona Ozouf. L’homme r´ eg´ en´ er´ e: Essais sur la R´ evolution fran¸ caise. Gal- limard, 1989

    1989

  53. [61]

    Instrument Technology: Bones, Tones, Phones, and Be- yond

    Tae Hong Park. “Instrument Technology: Bones, Tones, Phones, and Be- yond”. eng. In: The Routledge Companion to Music, Technology, and Ed- ucation. Ed. by Evangelos Himonides, Andrew King, and S. Alex Ruth- mann. Routledge, 2017, pp. 39–46. isbn: 1138921386

    2017

  54. [62]

    Nikolas S. Rose. Powers of Freedom : Reframing Political Thought . Cam- bridge University Press, 1999

    1999

  55. [63]

    Suno has raised $125 Million to build a future where anyone can make music

    Mikey Shulman. Suno has raised $125 Million to build a future where anyone can make music . Suno. 2024. url: https : / / suno . com / blog / fundraising-announcement-may-2024 . 24

    2024

  56. [64]

    Age of Disruption

    Jan Soeffner. “Age of Disruption”. eng. In: AI & society 40.4 (2025), pp. 2011–2014. issn: 0951-5666

    2025

  57. [65]

    Political Ideologies in the Age of Globalization

    Manfred B. Steger. “Political Ideologies in the Age of Globalization”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies . Ed. by Michael Freeden and Marc Stears. Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 214–231

    2013

  58. [66]

    Democratization

    Angus Stevenson, ed. Democratization. Accessed: 2025-11-06. Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2010.url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IuZ0j7AtR0Q

    2025

  59. [67]

    MusAIcology: AI Music and the Need for a New Kind of Music Studies

    Bob L. T. Sturm et al. “MusAIcology: AI Music and the Need for a New Kind of Music Studies”. In: SocArXiv (2024)

    2024

  60. [68]

    Suno AI - About

    Suno. Suno AI - About . Suno. url: https://suno.com/about

  61. [69]

    Composing with AI - Meet Up - Dassault Syst` emes

    Dassault Syst` emes. Composing with AI - Meet Up - Dassault Syst` emes . YouTube. Sept. 2020. url: https : / / www . youtube . com / watch ? v = IuZ0j7AtR0Q

    2020

  62. [70]

    New AI-powered ‘instant’ music-making app Udio raises $10m; launches with backing from WILL.I.AM, Common, UnitedMasters, A16Z

    Daniel Tencer. New AI-powered ‘instant’ music-making app Udio raises $10m; launches with backing from WILL.I.AM, Common, UnitedMasters, A16Z. https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/new-ai-powered- instant - music - making - app - udio - raises - 10m - launches - with - backing...

    2024

  63. [71]

    Harmonai, Dance Diffusion and The Audio Generation Revolution

    Justin Tenuto and Morgan (hosts) McGuire. Harmonai, Dance Diffusion and The Audio Generation Revolution . Sept. 2022. url: https://www. youtube.com/watch?v=KmB8z2CYjZY

    2022

  64. [72]

    Artificial intelligence be- came Beethoven: how do listeners and music professionals perceive artifi- cially composed music?

    Francisco Tigre Moura and Charlotte Maw. “Artificial intelligence be- came Beethoven: how do listeners and music professionals perceive artifi- cially composed music?” eng. In: The Journal of consumer marketing 38.2 (2021), pp. 137–146. issn: 0736-3761

    2021

  65. [73]

    Stability AI & Open Source Generative AI Music — Revolutionizing Music — Head of Harmonai Zach Evans

    Helen (host) Todd. Stability AI & Open Source Generative AI Music — Revolutionizing Music — Head of Harmonai Zach Evans . July 2023. url: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qcB12fJ4l0Q

    2023

  66. [74]

    Cultural proxim- ity bias in AI-acceptability: The importance of being human

    Annie Tubadji, Haoran Huang, and Don J Webber. “Cultural proxim- ity bias in AI-acceptability: The importance of being human”. eng. In: Technological forecasting & social change 173 (2021), pp. 121100–. issn: 0040-1625

    2021

  67. [75]

    Rachel S. Turner. Neo-liberal Ideology: History, Concepts and Policies . Edinburgh University Press, 2008

    2008

  68. [76]

    Ideology and Discourse

    Teun A. Van Dijk. “Ideology and Discourse”. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies . Ed. by Michael Freeden and Marc Stears. Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 175–196

    2013

  69. [77]

    AI will allow us all to make music we enjoy – An Everyday AI chat w/ Mikey Shulman

    Jordan (host) Wilson. AI will allow us all to make music we enjoy – An Everyday AI chat w/ Mikey Shulman . Feb. 2024. url: https : / / www . youtube.com/watch?v=MkdW5MZk26U. 25

    2024

  70. [78]

    Julie A. Wilson. Neoliberalism. eng. 1st. Key Ideas in Media & Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge, 2018. isbn: 9781138654631. 26

    2018

  71. [2024]

    url: https://x.com/udiomusic

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.