Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 61 references

The Market Effects of Algorithms

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A natural experiment in US housing markets shows that digitizing property records attracts algorithmic investors to minority-owned homes, raising their sale prices by 5% and cutting racial price gaps by 45%.

desk verdict The submission is broken: the full text is an astronomy paper, so only the abstract is reviewable; the abstract is promising but unverifiable, and I would not send this package to peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.09513 v1 pith:UH43YCGA submitted 2025-08-13 econ.GN q-fin.ECq-fin.GN

Lindsey Raymond This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.GNq-fin.ECq-fin.GN
keywords algorithmshousingmarketracialdisparitiesdigitizationnaturalexperimentalgorithmicinvestorshomepriceseffects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks what happens to a market when algorithmic prediction becomes cheap, rather than what one algorithm does for one decision-maker. It exploits the staggered digitization of county housing records—the shift from physical to digital property files—as a source of variation in the cost of using algorithms to value homes. The paper argues that digitization brings algorithmic investors into markets, that these investors concentrate in minority-owned neighborhoods where human buyers may be biased, and that the resulting competition raises the prices paid for minority-owned homes. The headline estimates are a 5% increase in the average sale price of minority-owned homes and a 45% reduction in racial disparities in home prices. The broader claim is that algorithms can reduce human bias at the market level through entry and competition, not only through individual optimization.

What carries the argument

The key mechanism is a staggered natural experiment: counties shift from physical to digital housing records at different times, and this digitization lowers the fixed cost of algorithmic home valuation. That cost shock induces entry by algorithmic investors, who concentrate in minority-owned segments, and prompts human investors to reallocate toward algorithmically hard-to-predict properties. The resulting bid competition for minority-owned homes is what raises prices and compresses the racial disparity.

What would settle it

A pre-trend test showing that minority-owned home prices were already rising in digitizing counties before digitization, or a placebo test using counties that later digitize, would directly undercut the causal claim. Also, if the algorithmic-investor classification is based on purchase outcomes, then showing the same results using an independent measure of investor technology adoption would be the decisive check.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the availability of algorithmic prediction changes who participates in the single-family housing market and therefore changes prices. Using the transition from physical to digital housing records as a market-level natural experiment, the paper shows that digitization leads to entry by investors using algorithms, without driving out investors who use human judgment. Instead, human investors shift toward houses that are hard to predict algorithmically. Algorithmic investors predominantly purchase minority-owned homes, a segment where humans may be biased, and their competition raises the prices paid by owner-occupiers and human investors

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the timing and location of housing-record digitization is unrelated to local market conditions, especially race-specific price trends and investor demand; if digitization is itself a response to those trends, the 5% and 45% estimates are confounded.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the estimate is causal, widespread digitization of housing records raises minority home prices by roughly 5% and cuts the racial price gap by roughly 45% in affected markets.
  • Human investors are not replaced; they specialize in homes that algorithms predict poorly, so the effect of algorithmic entry is a reallocation, not a displacement.
  • The benefits of algorithmic valuation are transmitted to minority sellers through higher prices, even though the algorithms themselves are not designed to correct bias.
  • Market-level policy that lowers the cost of algorithmic prediction—such as open data or digital records—could have larger effects on racial inequality than improving any single algorithm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension: the same digitization shock should generate smaller price effects in majority-white neighborhoods, because algorithmic investors' concentration is specific to minority-owned segments; published estimates by neighborhood composition would confirm this.
  • The welfare picture is mixed: minority sellers gain, but minority buyers who are not algorithmic investors may face higher prices; the paper does not estimate buyer-side welfare.
  • If investor type is inferred from transaction outcomes rather than observed technology use, part of the reallocation result may be mechanical; direct data on investors' adoption of algorithmic pricing tools would sharpen the causal chain.
  • The 45% gap reduction is a partial-equilibrium outcome; general-equilibrium effects could spill into rental markets or into future seller entry, changing the long-run magnitude.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The submission's abstract presents an economics paper claiming that digitization of housing records (a market-level natural experiment) induces entry by algorithmic investors, shifts human investors toward algorithmically hard-to-predict homes, and ultimately raises minority-owned home sale prices by 5% and reduces racial price disparities by 45%. The body of the manuscript, however, is an unrelated astronomy article (arXiv:2508.09518) describing two spiral-host radio galaxies discovered through the RAD@home citizen science program. No econometric specification, data description, identification strategy, standard errors, robustness checks, or mechanism decomposition supporting the abstract appears anywhere in the supplied full text. The claims in the abstract are therefore unsupported by any auditable evidence in the manuscript.

Significance. If the claimed result were established, it would be significant: it would provide a market-level natural experiment on how algorithmic prediction affects entry, allocation, and racial price disparities in the largest component of household wealth. The paper would contribute to the literature on algorithmic bias, housing discrimination, and the general equilibrium effects of AI tools. However, the significance cannot be assessed beyond the abstract because the body contains no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, parameter-free derivations, or falsifiable empirical predictions connected to the economics claims. The submitted full text is an astronomy manuscript, so the 5% and 45% estimates, the exclusion restriction, the investor classification, and the mechanism decomposition are all unverifiable. The identification problem is total rather than local.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. Full Text] The abstract's central claim—'Digitization increases the average sale price of minority-owned homes by 5% and reduces racial disparities in home prices by 45%'—is not supported by the manuscript body. The entire full text is an astronomy paper (arXiv:2508.09518) on ram-pressure-stripped radio galaxies, with no mention of housing, digitization, algorithms, investors, or prices. No regression equation, data table, or robustness check appears anywhere. This is a complete absence of evidence for the paper's claim, not a local gap.
  2. [No identification or uncertainty reporting] The abstract reports two point estimates with no standard errors, confidence intervals, specification, or identification tests. The causal chain requires that digitization timing and location be exogenous to race-specific price trends and investor demand; the manuscript contains no instrument definition, exclusion-restriction argument, or balance/trend diagnostics. The reader's weakest assumption—exogeneity of digitization—is thus untestable from the supplied text. This is load-bearing because the 5% and 45% magnitudes are the paper's main empirical results.
  3. [Algorithmic-investor classification] The mechanism claim that 'algorithmic investors predominantly purchase minority-owned homes' and 'human investors shift toward houses that are difficult to predict algorithmically' is at risk of circularity if the algorithmic/human label is inferred from purchase outcomes or from algorithmic difficulty. The abstract gives no classification rule, and no classification rule is auditable in the full text. Without an independent definition of algorithmic investors, the entry and reallocation results are partly definitional. This concern is structurally separate from the price claim and needs to be addressed in any revision.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Manuscript metadata] The advertised arXiv ID (2508.09513, econ.GN) does not match the full text's header 'arXiv:2508.09518v1 [astro-ph.GA]'. The submission appears to contain the wrong paper's body.
  2. [Abstract reporting] Even if the correct body were supplied, the abstract reports two point estimates (5% and 45%) with no uncertainty quantification, sample size, or p-values. Please add standard errors or confidence intervals in the abstract/reporting.
  3. [Journal template] The full-text header is the MDPI 'Journal Not Specified' template, and the copyright line refers to an unrelated article; this is a presentation and document-integrity issue that must be corrected before any further review.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable: the supplied full text is an unrelated astronomy manuscript, so the economics paper's derivation chain is absent and no step can be shown to reduce to its own inputs by construction.

full rationale

The object of review is an economics abstract (arXiv:2508.09513) whose central claims are a 5% price increase for minority-owned homes, a 45% reduction in racial price disparities, and a mechanism via algorithmic-investor entry. However, the supplied 'FULL TEXT' is arXiv:2508.09518, an astronomy paper on radio galaxies. No regression specifications, instrument definitions, data-construction rules, or identification arguments from the economics paper are present. Circularity analysis requires quoting the paper's own equations or definitions to exhibit a specific reduction, e.g., a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or a self-citation chain that forces the conclusion. None of that evidence exists here. The abstract alone does not define 'algorithmic investor' in a way that makes the entry result definitional, and it does not state that digitization is measured in terms of the outcome. Therefore, no circular step can be established. The document mismatch is a serious completeness problem, but it is not circularity: an absent derivation cannot be shown to be equivalent to its inputs. The appropriate finding is no significant circularity (score 0), with the caveat that the economics paper's methods cannot be audited from the supplied text.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Provisional ledger. Because the supplied body text is an unrelated astronomy manuscript, none of the premises below can be verified from the actual text of the economics paper; they are the assumptions that the abstract's causal claims necessarily rely on. No new theoretical entities are introduced in the abstract; the 'algorithmic investor' is an empirical classification of market participants, not a postulated construct such as a new force, particle, or conserved quantity.

free parameters (3)
  • Hedonic price regression controls and fixed effects = not reported in abstract
    The 5% price effect and 45% disparity reduction are regression estimates in nearly any such design; the control set, fixed effects, and clustering are unspecified.
  • Algorithmic-investor classification rule = not reported in abstract
    Entry and allocation results require a data rule separating algorithmic from human investors; any threshold or model used is a fitted choice that cannot be audited.
  • Digitization treatment definition (timing and counties) = not reported in abstract
    The natural experiment's assignment variable is the core input; its construction is not described in the abstract.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Digitization of housing records is exogenous to local housing-market conditions and race-specific price trends.
    Stated in the abstract as a 'market-level natural experiment that generates variation in the cost of using algorithms to value houses.' This exogeneity is the identifying premise for the 5% and 45% estimates.
  • domain assumption Digitization affects prices only through algorithmic valuation adoption, not through other channels such as general information transparency or liquidity.
    The abstract attributes the disparity reduction to algorithmic entry via competition; an exclusion restriction of this kind is needed and is not stated.
  • domain assumption Algorithmic and human investors are correctly and stably classified in transaction data.
    The entry and reallocation results ('does not push out human investors,' 'shift toward hard-to-predict houses') require a reliable investor-type label, unverifiable from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Market Effects of Algorithms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UH43YCGA

@misc{pith2026250809513,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Market Effects of Algorithms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UH43YCGA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.09513}
}
read the original abstract

While there is excitement about the potential for algorithms to optimize individual decision-making, changes in individual behavior will, almost inevitably, impact markets. Yet little is known about such effects. In this paper, I study how the availability of algorithmic prediction changes entry, allocation, and prices in the US single-family housing market, a key driver of household wealth. I identify a market-level natural experiment that generates variation in the cost of using algorithms to value houses: digitization, the transition from physical to digital housing records. I show that digitization leads to entry by investors using algorithms, but does not push out investors using human judgment. Instead, human investors shift toward houses that are difficult to predict algorithmically. Algorithmic investors predominantly purchase minority-owned homes, a segment of the market where humans may be biased. Digitization increases the average sale price of minority-owned homes by 5% and reduces racial disparities in home prices by 45%. Algorithmic investors, via competition, affect the prices paid by owner-occupiers and human investors for minority homes; such changes drive the majority of the reduction in racial disparities. The decrease in racial inequality underscores the potential for algorithms to mitigate human biases at the market level.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    et al., Discovery of a spiral-host episodic radio galaxy, MMRAS 2011, 417, L36–L40

    Hota, A; Sirothia, S.K.; Ohyama, Y. et al., Discovery of a spiral-host episodic radio galaxy, MMRAS 2011, 417, L36–L40

    work page 2011

  2. [2]

    Bagchi, J.; Vivek, M.; Vikram, V . et al. Megaparsec relativistic jets launched from an accreting supermassive black hole in an extreme spiral galaxy,ApJ 2014 788 174-191

    work page 2014

  3. [3]

    Sethi, S.; Ku´ zmicz, A.; Hunik, D.; Jamrozy, M., Serendipitous discovery of a spiral host in a 2 Mpc double-double lobed radio galaxy, A&A, 2025, (in press)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    A.; O’Dea, C

    Baum, S. A.; O’Dea, C. P .; Dallacassa, D.; de Bruyn, A. G.; Pedlar, A., Kiloparsec-Scale Radio Emission in Seyfert Galaxies: Evidence for Starburst-driven Superwinds? ApJ 1993 419, 553-572

    work page 1993

  5. [5]

    Colbert E. J. M.; Baum S. A.; Gallimore J. F.; O’Dea C. P .; Christensen J. A., Large-Scale Outflows in Edge-on Seyfert Galaxies. II. Kiloparsec-Scale Radio Continuum Emission, ApJ, 1996, 467, 551-578

    work page 1996

  6. [6]

    Axon, David J

    Gallimore, Jack F. ; Axon, David J. ; O’Dea, Christopher P . ; Baum, Stefi A. ; Pedlar, Alan, A Survey of Kiloparsec-Scale Radio Outflows in Radio-Quiet Active Galactic Nuclei, AJ, 2006, 132, 546–569

    work page 2006

  7. [7]

    & Saikia D.J., Radio bubbles in the composite AGN-starburst galaxy NGC 6764, MNRAS, 2006, 371, 945–956

    Hota A. & Saikia D.J., Radio bubbles in the composite AGN-starburst galaxy NGC 6764, MNRAS, 2006, 371, 945–956

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    , A population of galaxy-scale jets discovered using LOFAR, MNRAS, 2021, 500, 4921–4936

    Webster, B.; Croston, J.H.; Mingo, B.; et al. , A population of galaxy-scale jets discovered using LOFAR, MNRAS, 2021, 500, 4921–4936

    work page 2021

Show all 61 references
  1. [9]

    et al., The Active Jet in NGC 4258 and Its Associated Shocks, ApJ, 2000, 536, 675-696

    Cecil, G.; Greenhill, L.J.; DePree, C.G. et al., The Active Jet in NGC 4258 and Its Associated Shocks, ApJ, 2000, 536, 675-696

    2000

  2. [10]

    J.; Macchetto, F

    Capetti, A.; Axon, D. J.; Macchetto, F. D.; Marconi, A.; Winge, C., The Origin of the Narrow-Line Region of Markarian 3: An Overpressured Jet Cocoon, ApJ, 1999, 516, 187194

    1999

  3. [11]

    & de Zeeuw, P .T., A dichotomy in the orientation of dust and radio jets in nearby low-power radio galaxies, A&A, 2005, 435, 43–64

    Verdoes Kleijn, G.A. & de Zeeuw, P .T., A dichotomy in the orientation of dust and radio jets in nearby low-power radio galaxies, A&A, 2005, 435, 43–64

    2005

  4. [12]

    Kinney, A. L. ; Schmitt, H. R. ; Clarke, C. J. ; Pringle, J. E. ; Ulvestad, J. S. ; Antonucci, R. R. J., Jet Directions in Seyfert Galaxies, ApJ, 2000, 537, 152-177

    2000

  5. [13]

    Gott, J

    Gunn, James E. ; Gott, J. Richard, III On the Infall of Matter Into Clusters of Galaxies and Some Effects on Their Evolution, APJ, 1972, 176, 1

    1972

  6. [14]

    Moore, Ben ; Bower, Richard G, Ram pressure stripping of spiral galaxies in clusters, MNRAS, 1999, 308, 4, 947-954

    Abadi, Mario G. ; Moore, Ben ; Bower, Richard G, Ram pressure stripping of spiral galaxies in clusters, MNRAS, 1999, 308, 4, 947-954

    1999

  7. [15]

    Ignesti, A. et al. Walk on the Low Side: LOFAR Explores the Low-frequency Radio Emission of GASP Jellyfish Galaxies, ApJ, 2022, 937, 2, 58, 16

    2022

  8. [16]

    Croton, D., et al., MNRAS, 2006, 365, 111

    2006

  9. [17]

    J.; Croston, J

    Hardcastle, M. J.; Croston, J. H., Radio galaxies and feedback from AGN jets, NewAR, 2020, 88, 101539

    2020

  10. [18]

    Hota, A.; Konar, C.; Stalin, C.S. et al. Tracking Galaxy Evolution Through Low-Frequency Radio Continuum Observations using SKA and Citizen-Science Research using Multi-Wavelength Data, J Astrophys Astron, 2016, 37, 41- Version October 21, 2025 submitted to Journal Not Specifi...

    2016

  11. [19]

    RAD@home citizen science discovery of an active galactic nucleus spewing a large unipolar radio bubble on to its merging companion galaxy, MNRAS, 2022, 517, L86–L91

    Hota, A; Dabhade, P .; Vaddi, S.; Konar, C.; Pal, S.; Gulati, M.; Stalin, C.S.; Avinash, Ck.; Kumar, A.; Rajoria, M.; Purohit, A. RAD@home citizen science discovery of an active galactic nucleus spewing a large unipolar radio bubble on to its merging companion galaxy, MNRAS, 2...

    2022

  12. [20]

    et al., The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance,AJ, 2010, 140, 6, 1868-1881

    Wright, E.L. et al., The Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE): Mission Description and Initial On-orbit Performance,AJ, 2010, 140, 6, 1868-1881

    2010

  13. [21]

    et al., The Calibration and Data Products of GALEX, ApJS, 2007, 173, 682

    Morrissey, A. et al., The Calibration and Data Products of GALEX, ApJS, 2007, 173, 682

    2007

  14. [22]

    Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 2021, 17(S375), 40-41

    Kumar, A; Avinash Ck.; Purohit A.; Hota A., RAD@home RGB-maker web-tool for citizen science research in multi-wavelength study of AGNs with radio jets. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union 2021, 17(S375), 40-41

    2021

  15. [23]

    Intema, H. T. ; Jagannathan, P . ; Mooley, K. P . ; Frail, D. A., The GMRT 150 MHz all-sky radio survey. First alternative data release TGSS ADR1, A&A, 2017, 598, A78

    2017

  16. [24]

    Condon, J. J. ; Cotton, W. D. ; Greisen, E. W. ; Yin, Q. F. ; Perley, R. A. ; Taylor, G. B.; Broderick, J. J. The NRAO VLA Sky Survey,AJ, 1998, 115, 1693-1716

    1998

  17. [25]

    White, Richard L

    Becker, Robert H. ; White, Richard L. ; Helfand, David J., The FIRST Survey: Faint Images of the Radio Sky at Twenty Centimeters, AJ, 1995, 450, 559-

    1995

  18. [26]

    Intema, H

    de Gasperin, F. ; Intema, H. T. ; Frail, D. A., A radio spectral index map and catalogue at 147-1400 MHz covering 80 per cent of the sky, MNRAS, 2018, 474, 4, 5008-5022

    2018

  19. [27]

    Brent ; Verheijen, Marc A

    Trentham, Neil ; Tully, R. Brent ; Verheijen, Marc A. W., The Ursa Major cluster of galaxies - III. Optical observations of dwarf galaxies and the luminosity function down to MR=-11, MNRAS,2001 , 325, 1, 385-404

    2001

  20. [28]

    I., Merging groups and clusters of galaxies from the SDSS data-The catalogue of groups and potentially merging systems, A&A, 2017, 602, A100

    Tempel, E ; Tuvikene, T ; Kipper, R ; & Libeskind, N. I., Merging groups and clusters of galaxies from the SDSS data-The catalogue of groups and potentially merging systems, A&A, 2017, 602, A100

    2017

  21. [29]

    Shimwell, T. W. ; Hardcastle, M. J. ; Tasse, C. ; Best, P . N. ; Röttgering, H. J. A. et al. The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. V . Second data release, A&A, 2022, 659, 27

    2022

  22. [30]

    Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys The Astronomical Journal, 2019, 157, 5, 168, 29

    Dey, Arjun et al. Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys The Astronomical Journal, 2019, 157, 5, 168, 29

    2019

  23. [31]

    Zou, H. et al. Project Overview of the Beijing-Arizona Sky Survey, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 2017, 129, 976, 064101

    2017

  24. [32]

    Shimwell, T. W. et al. The LOFAR Two-metre Sky Survey. II. First data release, A&A, 2019, 622, 1

    2019

  25. [33]

    Dabhade, Pratik. ; D. J. Saikia. ; and Mahato, Mousumi. Decoding the giant extragalactic radio sources, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 2023, 44.1, 13

    2023

  26. [34]

    Bonnarel, F. et al. The ALADIN interactive sky atlas. A reference tool for identification of astronomical sources Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement, 2000, 143, 33-40

    2000

  27. [35]

    Thilker et al., A Search for Extended Ultraviolet Disk (XUV-Disk) Galaxies in the Local Universe, bf 2007, ApJS, 173 538

    David A. Thilker et al., A Search for Extended Ultraviolet Disk (XUV-Disk) Galaxies in the Local Universe, bf 2007, ApJS, 173 538

    2007

  28. [36]

    Vega Beltrán, J. C. ; Pizzella, A.; Corsini, E. M.; Funes, J. G. ; Zeilinger, W. W. ; Beckman, J. E. ; Bertola, F., Kinematic properties of gas and stars in 20 disc galaxies, 2001, A&A, 374, 394-411

    2001

  29. [37]

    Pignatelli, E

    E. Pignatelli, E. M. et al., Modelling gaseous and stellar kinematics in the disc galaxies NGC 772, 3898 and 7782, 2001, MNRAS, 323, 1, 188–210

    2001

  30. [38]

    et al., The Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey I: Design and first results, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 2020, 37, 48

    McConnell, D. et al., The Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey I: Design and first results, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 2020, 37, 48

    2020

  31. [39]

    Duchesne, S. W., et al., The Rapid ASKAP Continuum Survey IV: continuum imaging at 1367.5 MHz and the first data release of RACS-mid, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 2023, 40, e034

    2023

  32. [40]

    M., et al

    Hopkins, A. M., et al. The Evolutionary Map of the Universe: A new radio atlas for the southern hemisphere sky. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 2025, 1-32

    2025

  33. [41]

    Wen, Z. L. and Han, J. L., Calibration of the Optical Mass Proxy for Clusters of Galaxies and an Update of the WHL12 Cluster Catalog, 2015, ApJ, 807, 178

    2015

  34. [42]

    Sankhyayan, Shishir et al., Identification of Superclusters and Their Properties in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Using the WHL Cluster Catalog, 2023, ApJ, 958, 1, 62, 19

    2023

  35. [43]

    J.; de Gasperin, F.; Akamatsu, H

    van Weeren, R. J.; de Gasperin, F.; Akamatsu, H. et al., Diffuse Radio Emission from Galaxy Clusters,Space Science Reviews, bf 2019, 215, 1, 16, 75

    2019

  36. [44]

    A.; Gopal-Krishna, Reviving fossil radio plasma in clusters of galaxies by adiabatic compression in environmental shock waves, A&A, 2001, 366, 26-34

    Enßlin, T. A.; Gopal-Krishna, Reviving fossil radio plasma in clusters of galaxies by adiabatic compression in environmental shock waves, A&A, 2001, 366, 26-34

    2001

  37. [45]

    Intema, H

    Mandal, S. ; Intema, H. T. ; van Weeren, R. J. et al. Revived fossil plasma sources in galaxy clusters, A&A, 2020, 634, A4, 11

    2020

  38. [46]

    Riseley, C. J. et al. Relighting the fire in Hickson Compact Group (HCG) 15: Magnetised fossil plasma revealed by the SKA Pathfinders and Precursors, A&, 2025, 697, 45, 32

    2025

  39. [47]

    Wen, Z. L. ; Han, J. L.; Liu, F. S., A Catalog of 132,684 Clusters of Galaxies Identified from Sloan Digital Sky Survey III, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement, 2012, 199, 2, 34, 12 Version October 21, 2025 submitted to Journal Not Specified 18 of 18

    2012

  40. [48]

    Boselli, A

    Boissier, S. ; Boselli, A. ; Duc, P . -A. et al. The GALEX Ultraviolet Virgo Cluster Survey (GUViCS). II. Constraints on star formation in ram-pressure stripped gas, A&A, 2012, 545, A142, 16

    2012

  41. [49]

    Hota, A; Saikia, D.J.; Irwin, J.A., NGC 4438 and its environment at radio wavelengths, MNRAS, 2007, 380, 3, 1009–1022

    2007

  42. [50]

    Y.; Yuan, Z

    Gao, X. Y.; Yuan, Z. S.; Han, J. L. ; Wen, Z. L. ; Shan, S. S., Three New Spiral Galaxies with Active Nuclei Producing Double Radio Lobes, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2023, 23, 3, 035005, 8

    2023

  43. [51]

    S.; Gao, X

    Yuan, Z. S.; Gao, X. Y.; Wen, Z. L. ; Han, J. L., Four Late-type Galaxies with Double Radio Lobes and Properties of Such Galaxies, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2024, 24, 4, 045007, 7

    2024

  44. [52]

    O’Dea, C. P . ; Daly, R. A.; Kharb, P . ; Freeman, K. A. ; Baum, S. A., Physical properties of very powerful FRII radio galaxies,A&A, 2009, 494, 2, 471-488

    2009

  45. [53]

    Gopal-Krishna ; Wiita, Paul J., Asymmetries in Powerful Extragalactic Radio Sources, Asian Journal of Physics, 2004 ( https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0409761 )

    2004 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Gopal-Krishna; Wiita, Paul J., On the Origin of Correlated Radio-optical Asymmetries in Double Radio Sources,1996, ApJ, 467, 191

    1996

  47. [55]

    Freeland and E

    E. Freeland and E. Wilcots, Intergalactic Gas in Groups of Galaxies: Implications for Dwarf Spheroidal Formation and the Missing Baryons Problem, ApJ, 2011, 738, 2, 145, 9

    2011

  48. [56]

    Kantharia, N. G. ; Ananthakrishnan, S. ; Nityananda, R. ; Hota, A, GMRT observations of the group Holmberg 124: Evolution by tidal forces and ram pressure? A&A,, 2005, 435, 2, 483-496

    2005

  49. [57]

    & Jamrozy, M., Recurrent activity in Active Galactic Nuclei, Bull

    Saikia, D.J. & Jamrozy, M., Recurrent activity in Active Galactic Nuclei, Bull. Astr. Soc. India, 2009, 37, 63-89

    2009

  50. [58]

    J., Oei, M

    Dabhade, P ., Chavan, K., Saikia, D. J., Oei, M. S., & Röttgering, H. J., Search and analysis of giant radio galaxies with associated nuclei (SAGAN)-V . Study of giant double-double radio galaxies from LoTSS DR2,A&A, 2025, 696, A97

    2025

  51. [59]

    & Saikia, D

    Hummel, E. & Saikia, D. J., The anomalous radio features in NGC 4388 and NGC 4438, A&A, 1991, 249, 43-56

    1991

  52. [60]

    Chyzy, K. T. ; Soida, M. ; Bomans, D. J. ; Balkowski, Ch. ; Beck, R. ; Urbanik, M. Large-scale magnetized outflows from the Virgo Cluster spiral NGC4569, A&A, 2006, 447, 2, 465-47

    2006

  53. [61]

    Wagner, Alexander Y

    Mukherjee, Dipanjan ; Bicknell, Geoffrey V . ; Wagner, Alexander Y. ; Sutherland, Ralph S. ; Silk, Joseph, Relativistic jet feedback - III. Feedback on gas discs, MNRAS, 2018, 479, 4, 5544-5566 Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all pub...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.