Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 43 references

High-resolution multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer for exotic nuclei at IGISOL

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A newly commissioned multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer at IGISOL reaches 22 ns FWHM peaks and a mass-resolving power of about 150,000 within 20 ms.

desk verdict The IGISOL MR-ToF-MS commissioning paper reports plausible, internally consistent performance numbers, though the abstract alone doesn't let anyone audit the measurement details. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10048 v1 pith:NNLGO4NV submitted 2025-08-12 physics.ins-det nucl-ex

V.A. Virtanen , T. Eronen , A. Kankainen , O. Beliuskina , Z. Ge , R.P. de Groote , A. Jokinen , M. Mougeot
show 4 more authors
A. de Roubin J. Ruotsalainen J. Sarén A. Takkinen
This is my paper
classification physics.ins-detnucl-ex
keywords multi-reflectiontime-of-flightmassspectrometrymass-resolvingpowerIGISOLexoticnucleiatomicmeasurementslongitudinalemittancepulseddrifttubeseparator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the commissioning of a multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer (MR-ToF-MS) at IGISOL and demonstrates that it produces time-of-flight peaks as narrow as 22 ns full-width at half-maximum, corresponding to a mass-resolving power of about $1.5\times10^5$ in a 20 ms measurement. The design uses six electrode pairs forming a nearly energy-isochronous potential plus a pulsed drift tube, so ions can bounce many times and accumulate a flight-time difference that depends almost entirely on mass-to-charge ratio. The authors show that the achieved focus and resolving power depend on the trapping energy, the energy spread, and the number of reflections, and that electrode voltage drift from temperature changes affects the resolving power; they measure the flight-time temperature sensitivity as $-5.55(30)$ ppm/K. From the $^{39}$K data they estimate the longitudinal emittance of the injected bunch as 175 eVns, close to the expected 186(10) eVns. If these numbers hold, the instrument can be used for atomic mass measurements of short-lived exotic nuclides, as a fast mass separator, and as an ion counter for laser spectroscopy and yield measurements at IGISOL.

What carries the argument

The central object is the multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer itself: six electrode pairs create a nearly energy-isochronous electrostatic potential, and a pulsed drift tube traps the ions between the electrodes while they travel back and forth. The role of this arrangement is to make the total flight time over many revolutions depend almost only on the mass-to-charge ratio, so the large number of reflections within 20 ms sharpens the mass separation. The performance is quantified by three coupled quantities: the time-of-flight peak width (22 ns FWHM), the mass-resolving power (about $1.5\times10^5$), and the longitudinal emittance of the injected bunch (175 eVns from $^{39}$K)

What would settle it

With all other settings fixed, deliberately broaden the energy spread of the injected $^{39}$K bunch (for example by weakening the cooling or increasing the bunch length) and count how the 20 ms peak width changes; the stated dependence on energy spread predicts a clear degradation, so a 22 ns peak width that stays unchanged would contradict the paper's characterisation. Alternatively, heat or cool the electrode cage by 1 K during otherwise identical runs: the flight time should shift by about $-5.55$ ppm, and the resolving power should degrade if no voltage correction is applied; a substantia

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper establishes that a newly installed MR-ToF-MS at IGISOL reaches a time-of-flight peak width of 22 ns FWHM and a mass-resolving power of about $1.5\times10^5$ within 20 ms. It argues that the nearly energy-isochronous trapping potential makes the flight time over many reflections nearly independent of the ion energy, so the mass resolution is built up by the number of revolutions rather than by an extremely long drift tube. The paper also reports that the longitudinal emittance of the incoming $^{39}$K bunch, estimated from the data, is 175 eVns against an expected 186(10) eVns, and that the flight-time temperature sensitivity is $-5.55(30)$ ppm/K. In practical term

Load-bearing premise

The quoted 22 ns peak width and $1.5\times10^5$ resolving power assume that the injected ion bunch has a sufficiently small and stable temporal and energy spread and that temperature-driven electrode voltage drift is small or corrected; if those conditions fail, the stated performance numbers do not apply.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • At $1.5\times10^5$ resolving power in 20 ms, the device can separate nuclides whose mass-to-charge ratios differ by about one part in $1.5\times10^5$, fast enough for nuclei with half-lives around tens of milliseconds.
  • Because the measurement time is only 20 ms, the MR-ToF-MS can serve as a practical tool for atomic mass measurements of short-lived exotic species produced at IGISOL.
  • The same device can act as a fast mass separator, delivering mass-selected beams to downstream experiments, and as an ion counter for laser spectroscopy and yield measurements.
  • The measured temperature sensitivity implies the electrode voltages must be stabilised or corrected to the level needed to preserve the quoted resolving power, giving an operational constraint for routine use.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The near-agreement of the measured emittance (175 eVns) with the expected value (186(10) eVns) suggests the injected $^{39}$K bunches are already close to the design limit of the ion guide; if so, improving bunch cooling further would yield only modest gains in resolving power at a fixed 20 ms trapping time.
  • A testable extension is to map the resolving power as a function of the number of trapped ions; space-charge repulsion within dense bunches could set an upper limit on the usable ion rate that is not addressed by the single-bunch characterisation presented here.
  • The quoted temperature sensitivity could be used to build a real-time correction: if the electrode-cage temperature is monitored, the time-of-flight scale can be corrected over long averaging runs, which would matter for precision mass measurements where many 20 ms cycles are summed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the commissioning of a Multi-Reflection Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (MR-ToF-MS) at the IGISOL facility. The instrument uses six electrode pairs forming a nearly energy-isochronous potential and a pulsed drift-tube for ion trapping. The abstract claims time-of-flight peak widths down to 22 ns FWHM, mass-resolving powers of approximately 1.5e5 within 20 ms, a longitudinal emittance for 39K estimated at 175 eVns (close to an expected 186(10) eVns), and a time-of-flight temperature sensitivity of -5.55(30) ppm/K. The abstract also identifies applications as a fast mass separator and ion counter for laser spectroscopy and yield measurements.

Significance. If the quoted performance figures hold under the stated conditions, this instrument represents a useful addition to the IGISOL facility, enabling high-resolution mass measurements of short-lived exotic nuclides and acting as a fast separator. The longitudinal emittance estimate agreeing with an independent expectation is a particularly strong point, as it provides a cross-check on the beam dynamics model. However, the claims are presented only at the abstract level; the full methodology, data treatment, and error propagation are not available for audit in the provided material. The instrument's demonstrated resolving power and speed would be valuable to the community if fully substantiated.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The central performance claims (22 ns FWHM, R ≈ 1.5e5 in 20 ms, emittance 175 eVns) are not verifiable from the abstract alone. The abstract states these results 'have been demonstrated' and that the emittance is 'estimated based on the data,' but it does not provide the experimental conditions, ion-bunch parameters, voltage-stability corrections, or the error propagation from time-of-flight measurements to the quoted emittance and temperature sensitivity. Without these details, a referee cannot independently assess whether the numbers are robust or whether they depend on favorable beam conditions. The full manuscript must contain the experimental setup, the measurement procedure, and the uncertainty analysis; if it does, this concern is alleviated.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should specify the ion species and mass/charge state for which the 22 ns FWHM and resolving power are quoted; only the emittance is explicitly attributed to 39K.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'nearly energy-isochronous potential' could be clarified to 'potential distribution' or 'potential well' to avoid ambiguity about whether the electrodes themselves form a potential.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected; instrument-commissioning claims rest on direct measurements and an external emittance comparison.

full rationale

The abstract reports direct measured quantities: time-of-flight peak widths (22 ns FWHM), mass-resolving powers (~1.5e5), and temperature sensitivity (-5.55(30) ppm/K). The only derived quantity, the longitudinal emittance of 39K (175 eVns), is explicitly estimated from the data and compared with the independently quoted expected value 186(10) eVns; the expected value is not constructed from the same fitted parameters or from the measured result. No self-citation is invoked, no definition reduces the target claim to its input, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The stated sensitivities to trapping energy, energy spread, and voltage fluctuations are ordinary measurement caveats rather than circular dependencies. Based on the available manuscript text, the derivation chain is self-contained against an external benchmark, so no circular step can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities appear in the abstract. The instrument settings, such as trapping energy and number of revolutions, are controlled variables rather than fitted parameters. The derived longitudinal emittance is a measured quantity compared against an external expected value, not a parameter tuned to force agreement.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Ions in the MR-ToF-MS follow classical equations of motion in electrostatic fields, and time-of-flight depends monotonically on mass-to-charge ratio within the accepted energy spread.
    The abstract interprets time-of-flight peaks as mass separation, which assumes standard ion-optics behavior in the trap.
  • domain assumption The trapping potential is nearly energy-isochronous over the accepted longitudinal emittance and revolution numbers used.
    The device design goal is an energy-isochronous potential; if false, the quoted resolving power would not be attainable.
  • domain assumption Electrode voltage fluctuations from temperature are sufficiently small or compensated during the measurement.
    The abstract explicitly states that resolving power is affected by such fluctuations, so the performance claim depends on their control or correction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-resolution multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer for exotic nuclei at IGISOL." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NNLGO4NV

@misc{pith2026250810048,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-resolution multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer for exotic nuclei at IGISOL},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NNLGO4NV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10048}
}
abstract

A Multi-Reflection Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer (MR-ToF-MS) has been commissioned at the Ion-Guide Isotope Separator On-Line (IGISOL) facility. It consists of six electrode pairs that form a nearly energy-isochronous potential and a pulsed drift-tube to trap the ions between the electrodes. Time-of-flight peak widths down to 22 ns full-width at half-maximum and mass-resolving powers of $\approx 1.5 \times 10^5$ within 20 ms have been demonstrated. The obtained time-focus and mass-resolving power depend sensitively on the trapping energy, energy spread and the number of revolutions of the ions. The mass-resolving power is affected by the temporal and energy spread of the ions entering the MR-ToF-MS, and fluctuations in the electrode voltages due to temperature variations. The longitudinal emittance corresponding to the temporal and energy spread of $^{39}$K is estimated to be 175 eVns based on the data, close to the expected 186(10) eVns. The time-of-flight temperature sensitivity is found to be -5.55(30) ppm/K. In addition to atomic mass measurements of short-lived exotic nuclides, the MR-ToF-MS can be used as a fast mass separator for various other experiments at IGISOL and as an ion counter for laser spectroscopy and yield measurements.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lunney, J

    D. Lunney, J. M. Pearson, C. Thibault, Recent trends in the determination of nuclear masses, Reviews of Modern Physics 75 (3) (2003) 1021--1082. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.75.1021 doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.1021

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.1021 2003

  2. [2]

    Blaum, High-accuracy mass spectrometry with stored ions https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157305004643, Physics Reports 425 (1) (2006) 1--78

    K. Blaum, High-accuracy mass spectrometry with stored ions https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157305004643, Physics Reports 425 (1) (2006) 1--78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.011 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.011 . ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370157305004643

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.011 2006

  3. [3]

    Eronen, A

    T. Eronen, A. Kankainen, J. Äystö, Ion traps in nuclear physics recent results and achievements, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 91 (2016) 259--293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.08.001 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2016.08.001 2016

  4. [4]

    Dilling, K

    J. Dilling, K. Blaum, M. Brodeur, S. Eliseev, Penning-Trap Mass Measurements in Atomic and Nuclear Physics , Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 68 (2018) 45--74. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094939 doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094939

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102711-094939 2018

  5. [5]

    Clark, Jason , Savard, Guy , Mumpower, Matthew , Kankainen, Anu , Precise mass measurements of radioactive nuclides for astrophysics https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01037-0, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (9) (2023) 204. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01037-0 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01037-0 . ://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01037-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-023-01037-0 2023

  6. [6]

    R. Wolf, F. Wienholtz, D. Atanasov, D. Beck, K. Blaum, C. Borgmann, F. Herfurth, M. Kowalska, S. Kreim, Y. A. Litvinov, D. Lunney, V. Manea, D. Neidherr, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, J. Stanja, K. Zuber, ISOLTRAP s multi-reflection time-of-flight mass separator/ spectrometer, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 349-350 (2013) 123--133. https://do...

    doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2013.03.020 2013

  7. [7]

    Savard, S

    G. Savard, S. Becker, G. Bollen, H.-J. Kluge, R. Moore, T. Otto, L. Schweikhard, H. Stolzenberg, U. Wiess, A new cooling technique for heavy ions in a penning trap, Physics Letters A 158 (5) (1991) 247--252. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9601(91)91008-2 doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)91008-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9601(91)91008-2 1991

  8. [8]

    Wollnik, M

    H. Wollnik, M. Przewloka, Time-of-flight mass spectrometers with multiply reflected ion trajectories https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/016811769085127N, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry and Ion Processes 96 (3) (1990) 267--274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1176(90)85127-N doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1176(90)8...

    work page arXiv 1990

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Casares, A

    A. Casares, A. Kholomeev, H. Wollnik, Multipass time-of-flight mass spectrometers with high resolving powers https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387380600003912, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 206 (3) (2001) 267--273. https://doi.org/https://doi.org...

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    Ishida, M

    Y. Ishida, M. Wada, Y. Matsuo, I. Tanihata, A. Casares, H. Wollnik, A time-of-flight mass spectrometer to resolve isobars https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168583X04001326, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with ...

    2004 doi

  3. [12]

    Schury, M

    P. Schury, M. Wada, Y. Ito, S. Naimi, T. Sonoda, H. Mita, A. Takamine, K. Okada, H. Wollnik, S. Chon, H. Haba, D. Kaji, H. Koura, H. Miyatake, K. Morimoto, K. Morita, A. Ozawa, A multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph for short-lived and super-heavy nuclei https://w...

    2013

  4. [13]

    Schury, M

    P. Schury, M. Wada, Y. Ito, F. Arai, S. Naimi, T. Sonoda, H. Wollnik, V. Shchepunov, C. Smorra, C. Yuan, A high-resolution multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrograph for precision mass measurements at riken/slowri https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S01685...

    2014 doi

  5. [14]

    Dickel, W

    T. Dickel, W. Plaß, A. Becker, U. Czok, H. Geissel, E. Haettner, C. Jesch, W. Kinsel, M. Petrick, C. Scheidenberger, A. Simon, M. Yavor, A high-performance multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer and isobar separator for the research with exotic nuclei https://www...

    2015

  6. [15]

    Chauveau, P

    P. Chauveau, P. Delahaye, G. De France , S. El Abir , J. Lory, Y. Merrer, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, R. Wolf, Pilgrim, a multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer for spiral2-s3 at ganil https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168583X16000732, Nuclear I...

    2016

  7. [16]

    B. Liu, M. Brodeur, D. Burdette, J. Kelly, T. Kim, J. Long, P. O’Malley, The performance of the commissioned notre dame multi-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900220310767, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Phy...

    2021

  8. [17]

    Reiter, S

    M. Reiter, S. A. S. Andrés, J. Bergmann, T. Dickel, J. Dilling, A. Jacobs, A. Kwiatkowski, W. Plaß, C. Scheidenberger, D. Short, C. Will, C. Babcock, E. Dunling, A. Finlay, C. Hornung, C. Jesch, R. Klawitter, B. Kootte, D. Lascar, E. Leistenschneider, T. Murböck, S. Paul, M. Y...

    2021

  9. [18]

    Rosenbusch, M

    M. Rosenbusch, M. Wada, S. Chen, A. Takamine, S. Iimura, D. Hou, W. Xian, S. Yan, P. Schury, Y. Hirayama, Y. Ito, H. Ishiyama, S. Kimura, T. Kojima, J. Lee, J. Liu, S. Michimasa, H. Miyatake, J. Moon, M. Mukai, S. Naimi, S. Nishimura, T. Niwase, T. Sonoda, Y. Watanabe, H. Woll...

    2023

  10. [19]

    Y. Ito, P. Schury, M. Wada, F. Arai, H. Haba, Y. Hirayama, S. Ishizawa, D. Kaji, S. Kimura, H. Koura, M. MacCormick, H. Miyatake, J. Y. Moon, K. Morimoto, K. Morita, M. Mukai, I. Murray, T. Niwase, K. Okada, A. Ozawa, M. Rosenbusch, A. Takamine, T. Tanaka, Y. X. Watanabe, H. W...

    2018 doi

  11. [20]

    Wienholtz, S

    F. Wienholtz, S. Kreim, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, R. Wolf, Mass-selective ion ejection from multi-reflection time-of-flight devices via a pulsed in-trap lift, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 421 (2017) 285--293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2017.07.016 doi:10...

    2017 doi

  12. [21]

    Dickel, W

    T. Dickel, W. R. Plaß, W. Lippert, J. Lang, M. I. Yavor, H. Geissel, C. Scheidenberger, Isobar separation in a multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometer by mass-selective re-trapping https://doi.org/10.1007/s13361-017-1617-z, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 28 (2017) 107...

    2017 doi

  13. [22]

    Moore, T

    I. Moore, T. Eronen, D. Gorelov, J. Hakala, A. Jokinen, A. Kankainen, V. Kolhinen, J. Koponen, H. Penttilä, I. Pohjalainen, M. Reponen, J. Rissanen, A. Saastamoinen, S. Rinta-Antila, V. Sonnenschein, J. Äystö, Towards commissioning the new IGISOL -4 facility, Nuclear Instrumen...

    2013 doi

  14. [23]

    H. Wollnik, History of mass measurements in time-of-flight mass analyzers https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387380613001504, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 349-350 (2013) 38--46, 100 years of Mass Spectrometry. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1...

    2013 doi

  15. [24]

    Virtanen, T

    V. Virtanen, T. Eronen, A. Kankainen, O. Beliuskina, P. Campbell, R. Delaplanche, Z. Ge, R. de Groote , M. Hukkanen, A. Jaries, R. Kronholm, I. Moore, A. Raggio, A. de Roubin, J. Ruotsalainen, M. Schuh, Miniaturised cooler-buncher for reduction of longitudinal emittance at igi...

    2025

  16. [25]

    R. N. Wolf, G. Marx, M. Rosenbusch, L. Schweikhard, Static-mirror ion capture and time focusing for electrostatic ion-beam traps and multi-reflection time-of-flight mass analyzers by use of an in-trap potential lift, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 313 (2012) 8--14....

    2012 doi

  17. [26]

    Yavor, Chapter 1 charged particles in electromagnetic fields, in: Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Advances in imaging and electron physics, Elsevier, 2009, pp

    M. Yavor, Chapter 1 charged particles in electromagnetic fields, in: Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, Advances in imaging and electron physics, Elsevier, 2009, pp. 1--32

    2009

  18. [27]

    W. R. Pla , T. Dickel, C. Scheidenberger, Multiple-reflection time-of-flight mass spectrometry, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 349-350 (2013) 134--144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2013.06.005 doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2013.06.005

    2013 doi

  19. [28]

    Nieminen, J

    A. Nieminen, J. Huikari, A. Jokinen, J. Äystö, P. Campbell, E. Cochrane, Beam cooler for low-energy radioactive ions, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 469 (2) (2001) 244--253. https:/...

    2001 doi

  20. [29]

    Y. P. Gangrsky, K. P. Marinova, S. G. Zemlyanoi, I. D. Moore, J. Billowes, P. Campbell, K. T. Flanagan, D. H. Forest, J. A. R. Griffith, J. Huikari, R. Moore, A. Nieminen, H. Thayer, G. Tungate, J. Äystö, Nuclear charge radii of neutron deficient titanium isotopes 44ti and 45t...

    2004 doi

  21. [30]

    D. A. Dahl, simion for the personal computer in reflection, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 200 (1-3) (2000) 3--25. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1387-3806(00)00305-5 doi:10.1016/s1387-3806(00)00305-5

    2000 doi

  22. [31]

    Stresau, K

    D. Stresau, K. Hunter, W. Sheils, P. Ran, Y. Benari, A new class of robust sub-nanosecond tof detectors with high dynamic range. https://www.etp-ms.com/file-repository/26, Tech. rep., ETP, Sydney, Australia. Presented at the 54th ASMS Conference on Mass Spectroscopy, Seattle, ...

    2006

  23. [32]

    Vilén, L

    M. Vilén, L. Canete, B. Cheal, A. Giatzoglou, R. de Groote , A. de Roubin , T. Eronen, S. Geldhof, A. Jokinen, A. Kankainen, I. Moore, D. Nesterenko, H. Penttilä, I. Pohjalainen, M. Reponen, S. Rinta-Antila, A new off-line ion source facility at igisol https://www.sciencedirec...

    2020 doi

  24. [33]

    oderstr\

    P. Schury, M. Wada, Y. Ito, D. Kaji, F. Arai, M. MacCormick, I. Murray, H. Haba, S. Jeong, S. Kimura, H. Koura, H. Miyatake, K. Morimoto, K. Morita, A. Ozawa, M. Rosenbusch, M. Reponen, P.-A. S\"oderstr\"om, A. Takamine, T. Tanaka, H. Wollnik, First online multireflection time...

    2017 doi

  25. [34]

    Ayet San Andr\'es, C

    S. Ayet San Andr\'es, C. Hornung, J. Ebert, W. R. Pla , T. Dickel, H. Geissel, C. Scheidenberger, J. Bergmann, F. Greiner, E. Haettner, C. Jesch, W. Lippert, I. Mardor, I. Miskun, Z. Patyk, S. Pietri, A. Pihktelev, S. Purushothaman, M. P. Reiter, A.-K. Rink, H. Weick, M. I. Ya...

    2019

  26. [35]

    Korkiamäki, Thorium-232 protoni-indusoidun fission tuottojakauma https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202406124567, Master's thesis, University of Jyväskylä (2024)

    R. Korkiamäki, Thorium-232 protoni-indusoidun fission tuottojakauma https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202406124567, Master's thesis, University of Jyväskylä (2024). ://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202406124567

    2024

  27. [36]

    Cannarozzo, S

    S. Cannarozzo, S. Pomp, A. Kankainen, I. Moore, M. Stryjczyk, A. Al-Adili, A. Solders, V. Virtanen, T. Eronen, Z. Gao, Z. Ge, A. Jaries, M. Lantz, M. Mougeot, H. Penttilä, A. Raggio, J. Ruotsalainen, https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.11274 Isomeric yield ratios and mass spectrometry ...

    2025

  28. [37]

    Reponen, I

    M. Reponen, I. D. Moore, I. Pohjalainen, S. Rothe, M. Savonen, V. Sonnenschein, A. Voss, An inductively heated hot cavity catcher laser ion source https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4936569, Review of Scientific Instruments 86 (12) (2015) 123501. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4936569 doi:1...

    2015 doi

  29. [38]

    Virtanen, M

    V. Virtanen, M. Reponen, et al., to be submitted (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    Reponen, R

    M. Reponen, R. P. de Groote, L. Al Ayoubi, O. Beliuskina, M. L. Bissell, P. Campbell, L. Cañete, B. Cheal, K. Chrysalidis, C. Delafosse, A. de Roubin, C. S. Devlin, T. Eronen, R. F. Garcia Ruiz, S. Geldhof, W. Gins, M. Hukkanen, P. Imgram, A. Kankainen, M. Kortelainen, A. Kosz...

    2021 doi

  31. [40]

    Eronen, V

    T. Eronen, V. S. Kolhinen, V. V. Elomaa, D. Gorelov, U. Hager, J. Hakala, A. Jokinen, A. Kankainen, P. Karvonen, S. Kopecky, I. D. Moore, H. Penttilä, S. Rahaman, S. Rinta-Antila, J. Rissanen, A. Saastamoinen, J. Szerypo, C. Weber, J. Äystö, JYFLTRAP : a penning trap for preci...

    2012 doi

  32. [41]

    Delahaye, E

    P. Delahaye, E. Liénard, I. Moore, M. Benali, M. L. Bissell, L. Canete, T. Eronen, A. Falkowski, X. Fléchard, M. Gonzalez-Alonso, W. Gins, R. P. De Groote, A. Jokinen, A. Kankainen, M. Kowalska, N. Lecesne, R. Leroy, Y. Merrer, G. Neyens, F. De Oliveira Santos, G. Quemener, A....

    2019 doi

  33. [42]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  34. [43]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

  35. [44]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.