Causal evidence for the primordiality of colours in trans-Neptunian objects

Andrea Valerio Macci\`o; Benjamin L. Davis; Kun Zhang; Mohamad Ali-Dib; Yujia Zheng; Zehao Jin

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 43 references

Causal evidence for the primordiality of colours in trans-Neptunian objects

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Trans-Neptunian object colours are largely primordial, and colour drives the inclination distribution rather than the other way round, according to a causal analysis of survey data.

desk verdict The abstract promises a causal discovery result about TNO colours, but the supplied body is an unrelated hep-th paper, so the submission's central claim has no derivation and is unauditable. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10089 v1 pith:ON3EQYSY submitted 2025-08-13 astro-ph.EP

Benjamin L. Davis , Mohamad Ali-Dib , Yujia Zheng , Zehao Jin , Kun Zhang , Andrea Valerio Macciò This is my paper

classification astro-ph.EP

keywords trans-NeptunianobjectsTNOcoloursprimordialcausaldiscoveryinclinationdistributionNeptunedynamicaleffectsconditionalindependenceSolarSystemformation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper takes on a long-standing Solar System question: do the colours of trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) record the conditions under which they formed, or are they mostly the result of later surface evolution? The authors report that causal discovery applied to two different observational datasets, using two different conditional-independence test methods, converges to the same directed graph: colour is the root cause of the TNO inclination distribution, and not vice versa. The same analysis, without being given any knowledge of Neptune, requires an unknown confounding variable that the authors identify as Neptune's dynamical influence. On this basis the paper concludes that TNO colours are predominantly primordial and that substantial post-formation colour modification is excluded.

What carries the argument

The central object is a directed acyclic graph over colour, eccentricity, and inclination, inferred from correlations by conditional-independence testing. The load-bearing step is the direction of causation: in the recovered graph colour has an edge pointing to inclination, and the reverse edge is absent. A second edge is a latent (unmeasured) confounding variable that the authors identify with Neptune's dynamical effects. The method is deliberately model-agnostic: it supplies no orbital mechanics or physics assumptions, so the causal direction and the latent confounder are outcomes of the data, not inputs.

What would settle it

Run the same causal-discovery procedure on a sample selected by a colour-blind survey strategy (for example, discovered by occultation or thermal emission rather than reflected-light colour), and check whether colour still precedes inclination; if the direction reverses or the latent confounder disappears, the primordiality conclusion collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a causal asymmetry: the colour of a TNO causes its inclination distribution, not the other way around. Because orbital inclination is a dynamical quantity set during the Solar System's early evolution, the authors argue that colour must record a dynamical property fixed at formation time, most plausibly the location where the object formed. The recovered causal graph also contains a latent confounder that the model, though never told about Neptune, identifies in a way the authors find consistent with Neptune's effects. The abstract states that the same graph emerges from two datasets and two conditional-independence test methods, and that this unanimity supports

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion stands or falls on the survey data being free of selection bias, so that the conditional-independence tests recover the true generative graph and the single latent confounder is really Neptune's dynamical effect; as supplied, the manuscript body contains none of the analysis needed to check that premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

TNO colours become a fossil record: a colour measurement tells you something about the object's formation location, not just its surface history.
Formation scenarios that require heavy post-formation colour modification are ruled out for the surveyed TNO population.
The causal direction colour to inclination means dynamical histories of the outer Solar System must treat colour as an initial condition rather than an outcome of orbital scattering.
The model's independent recovery of a Neptune-like confounder supports the standard picture in which Neptune stirred the early trans-Neptunian disk; this is a consistency check, not an input.
Agreement across two datasets and two test methods makes the recovered graph a target for future surveys to confirm or overturn.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If colour truly encodes formation location, then large colour surveys of TNOs could be inverted to map the radial distribution of planetesimal formation in the early Solar disk. This is an extension the authors gesture at but do not carry out.
The causal graph yields a testable prediction: in a colour-blind selected sample, colour should remain conditionally dependent on inclination only through formation-related variables, while surface-processing indicators should not erase that dependency once colour is known.
As supplied, the full text of this submission is a different manuscript about 3-manifold invariants; the TNO analysis, datasets, conditional-independence tests, and recovered graph appear only in the abstract here. That makes the claimed convergence unverifiable from the provided material.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The one thing to know: this submission is an abstract attached to the wrong body. The title and abstract describe a causal-discovery study of TNO colours; the full text is arXiv:2508.10087v2, a hep-th paper on bZ invariants and effective central charge for Brieskorn spheres. There are no TNOs, no colour data, no conditional-independence tests, no Neptune anywhere in the body. As submitted, the paper's central claim—that colour is the root cause of TNO inclination, and hence colours are predominantly primordial—has zero derivation. This is not a subtle methodological gap; it is a complete absence of the advertised analysis.

Is there anything new? The abstract's idea, taken on its own, is worth a look: a model-agnostic causal-discovery approach that recovers a latent confounder consistent with Neptune, without being told Neptune exists, would be a nice way to argue for a primordial origin of TNO colour. The authors also frame the result as excluding evolution-dominated formation scenarios, which is a testable, falsifiable kind of claim. That is a potentially interesting research programme. But the abstract is not a paper. It asserts 'unanimous convergence' to a common causal graph, two datasets, two test methods, and a Neptune prediction—none of which appear in the supplied text. There is nothing to check: no graphs, no tables, no code, no proof.

The soft spots are accordingly severe. The whole submission is a claim-without-derivation. The reader's soundness score of 1/10 is fair. I also agree that there is a circularity burden: even if the analysis existed, the identification of the latent confounder with Neptune's effects is an interpretive step that would need external validation, not just 'consistency' with the accepted dynamical paradigm. But that is a secondary concern; the primary problem is that the body does not engage with the abstract at all.

Who is this paper for? No one, as it stands. If the authors re-submit with the actual causal analysis—datasets, tests, the recovered graph, robustness checks including selection-bias correction—then it could be a legitimate astro-ph submission and would deserve a serious referee. As it is, the work should be desk-rejected or returned to the authors for a complete rewrite. I cannot recommend peer review for this version.

Recommendation: desk reject.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission arXiv:2508.10089 is titled 'Causal evidence for the primordiality of colours in trans-Neptunian objects' and its abstract claims a model-agnostic, data-driven causal analysis of Trans-Neptunian Object (TNO) colours, eccentricity, and inclination. The abstract asserts that two datasets, each analysed with two conditional-independence test methods, 'unanimously converge' to a causal graph in which colour is the root cause of inclination, that an unknown confounder is 'consistent with Neptune's effects', and that TNO colours are predominantly primordial. However, the supplied full text is arXiv:2508.10087v2, a hep-th paper titled 'ceff from Surgery and Modularity' by Harichurn, Jagadale, Noshchenko, and Passaro. That body text contains no mention of TNOs, colours, eccentricity, inclination, Neptune, conditional independence, causal graphs, or any observational survey. None of the analysis promised in the abstract—no datasets, no tests, no recovered graph, no confounding analysis—appears anywhere in the manuscript. The abstract is therefore the sole carrier of the advertised result, and every load-bearing step (data provenance, test methodology, graph recovery, latent-variable identification) is asserted rather than demonstrated.

Significance. If the abstract's claims were properly substantiated, the result would be significant for planetary science: establishing that TNO colour is causally prior to orbital inclination and that colours are primordial would bear directly on models of Solar System formation and evolution. The claimed model-agnostic recovery of a latent confounder consistent with Neptune, from data that do not encode Neptune's existence, would be a striking external validation of causal-discovery methodology. However, as submitted, the manuscript offers none of the evidence needed to assess these claims. The body text is an unrelated mathematical physics paper. There are no datasets, no statistical tests, no causal graphs, and no falsifiable predictions beyond the abstract's qualitative statements. Consequently, the significance of the advertised result cannot be evaluated, and the submission in its current form does not constitute a scientific paper on TNOs.

major comments (3)

[Abstract vs. Full Text] The central claims of the abstract—two datasets, two conditional-independence test methods, a unanimously recovered causal graph, and a latent confounder consistent with Neptune—have no corresponding derivation or description anywhere in the supplied full text. The body is arXiv:2508.10087v2, a hep-th paper about bZ invariants, Brieskorn spheres, and effective central charge. It contains no occurrence of TNOs, colours, inclination, eccentricity, Neptune, causal inference, or conditional independence. This is not a missing detail or a presentation gap; it is an absence of the entire analysis underlying the paper's title and abstract. The manuscript as submitted is unverifiable and cannot be audited even at the level of basic causal-discovery assumptions (faithfulness, causal sufficiency, selection-bias correction).
[Abstract, causal graph claim] The abstract states that the model 'unanimously converges to a common causal graph' and that 'colour of TNOs is the root cause of their inclination distribution, rather than the other way around.' No graph, no orientation, no edge set, and no conditional-independence test results are reported. Without these, the claim of unanimity across datasets and methods is a bare assertion. The reader cannot check whether the graph is identified, whether confounding is controlled, or whether the direction colour→inclination is derived from data rather than imposed by interpretation.
[Abstract, Neptune identification] The abstract states that the causal model 'with no knowledge of the existence of Neptune' predicts an unknown confounding variable 'consistent with Neptune's effects.' The full text contains no latent-variable analysis, no model comparison, and no test of consistency with Neptune. The identification of a recovered latent confounder with a specific physical mechanism is a load-bearing interpretive step that cannot be evaluated from the submitted text. As written, this is a conjecture about what the analysis would show, not a demonstrated result.

minor comments (2)

[Title and metadata] The title, abstract, and subject class (astro-ph.EP) describe a planetary-science paper, while the full text is a hep-th manuscript. This mismatch should be resolved before any further consideration; it is not a minor typographical issue but a fundamental inconsistency in submission integrity.
[References and notation] The body text references notation (e.g., bZ, ceff, Σ(s,t,rst±1)) that is irrelevant to the advertised TNO study. If the authors intended to include a supplementary analysis, it is not referenced or linked. No references to TNO colour surveys, inclination distributions, or causal-inference literature appear in the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular dependency can be established; the supplied full text is an unrelated hep-th paper, so the advertised causal analysis is absent rather than circular.

full rationale

The submitted full text is not the TNO paper announced by the abstract: it is arXiv:2508.10087v2, 'ceff from Surgery and Modularity', a hep-th paper concerning \hat Z invariants, Brieskorn spheres, effective central charge, and modularity. It contains no datasets, no conditional-independence tests, no causal graphs, and no mention of TNOs, colours, eccentricity, inclination, Neptune, or primordial formation. The abstract's claims—'unanimously converges to a common causal graph', 'predicts the need for an unknown confounding variable consistent with Neptune's effects', 'colour of TNOs is the root cause of their inclination distribution', and 'colours of TNOs are predominantly primordial'—are therefore asserted without any derivational chain in the supplied manuscript. This is a severe completeness/integrity failure: the advertised evidence is missing. However, the circularity pass asks whether a claimed result is equivalent to its input by construction, or forced by a self-citation chain. Missing support is not circularity. No equation, fitted parameter, ansatz, uniqueness citation, or self-citation can be quoted from the body to exhibit a reduction of the advertised prediction to its own input. The paper does not contain a derivation that could be audited for circularity; it contains no derivation of the TNO claim at all. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0, with the caveat that the absence of the analysis is a non-circular but decisive defect.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The abstract alone permits identifying three domain assumptions and one invented entity. All free parameters of the causal discovery pipeline (test thresholds, hyperparameters, dataset cuts) are unstated because the body is missing, so none can be enumerated. The hidden confounder is the paper's central invented entity.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption The true generative process of TNO colour, eccentricity, and inclination is a causal graph that conditional-independence tests can recover (faithfulness, no selection bias).
Abstract claims unanimous convergence to a common causal graph from two datasets; this is only meaningful if the observed correlations are not distorted by survey selection or unmeasured drivers.
domain assumption Measured TNO colour is a stable property determined at or near formation (i.e., colour modification by evolution is negligible or was tested).
The conclusion 'colours are predominantly primordial' presupposes that the colour variable in the graph is not a product of later processing; the abstract asserts the model excludes this, but the body is absent.
domain assumption The single unknown confounder recovered by the model corresponds to Neptune (or Neptune's dynamical effects).
Abstract states the model predicts an unknown confounder consistent with Neptune's effects; identifying it with Neptune-and-only-Neptune is an interpretive step beyond the graph.

invented entities (1)

unknown confounding variable (identified with Neptune's gravitational influence) independent evidence
purpose: explains correlation between TNO orbital elements and colour in the recovered causal graph
The abstract claims the model predicted this confounder without being told Neptune exists; if true this is an independent falsifiable handle, but the supporting analysis is not in the submission.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Causal evidence for the primordiality of colours in trans-Neptunian objects." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ON3EQYSY

@misc{pith2026250810089,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Causal evidence for the primordiality of colours in trans-Neptunian objects},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ON3EQYSY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10089}
}

read the original abstract

The origins of the colours of Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs) represent a crucial unresolved question, central to understanding the history of our Solar System. Recent observational surveys revealed correlations between the eccentricity and inclination of TNOs, and their colours. This rekindled the long-standing debate on whether these colours reflect the conditions of TNO formation or their subsequent evolution. We address this question using a model-agnostic, data-driven approach that unanimously converges to a common causal graph from the analysis of two different datasets, each from two different conditional independence test methods. For evaluation, we demonstrate how our model is consistent with the currently-accepted paradigms of TNOs' dynamical histories, without involving any orbital modelling or physics-based assumptions. Our causal model (with no knowledge of the existence of Neptune) predicts the need for an unknown confounding variable, consistent with Neptune's effects. The model predicts that the colour of TNOs is the root cause of their inclination distribution, rather than the other way around. This strongly suggests that the colours of TNOs reflect an underlying dynamical property, most likely their formation location. Our model excludes formation scenarios that invoke substantial colour modification by subsequent evolution. We conclude that the colours of TNOs are predominantly primordial.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

[1]

BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants,

S. Gukov, D. Pei, P. Putrov, and C. Vafa, “BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants,” Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications 29 no. 02, (2020) 2040003

work page 2020
[2]

3d Modularity,

M. C. N. Cheng, S. Chun, F. Ferrari, S. Gukov, and S. M. Harrison, “3d Modularity,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 no. 10, (2019) 1–95

work page 2019
[3]

Higher rank ˆZ and F� ,

S. Park, “Higher rank ˆZ and F� ,” SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 16 (2020) 044

work page 2020
[4]

Refined and Generalized ˆZ Invariants for Plumbed 3-Manifolds,

S. J. Ri, “Refined and Generalized ˆZ Invariants for Plumbed 3-Manifolds,” SIGMA 19 (2023) 011, ��

work page 2023
[5]

ˆZ� for plumbed manifolds and splice diagrams,

S. Gukov, L. Katzarkov, and J. Svoboda, “ ˆZ� for plumbed manifolds and splice diagrams,” ��

work page
[6]

Quantum Modular bZ� -Invariants,

M. C. N. Cheng, I. Coman, D. Passaro, and G. Sgroi, “Quantum Modular bZ� -Invariants,” SIGMA 20 (2024) 018, ��

work page 2024
[7]

3d Modularity Revisited,

M. C. N. Cheng, I. Coman, P. Kucharski, D. Passaro, and G. Sgroi, “3d Modularity Revisited,” ��

work page
[8]

Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev invariants and homological blocks for plumbed homology spheres,

Y. Murakami, “Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev invariants and homological blocks for plumbed homology spheres,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 18 no. 2, (2024) 371–403, ��

work page 2024

Show all 43 references

[9]

Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, hopf categories, and the canonical bases,

L. Crane and I. B. Frenkel, “Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, hopf categories, and the canonical bases,” Journal of Mathematical Physics 35 no. 10, (Oct., 1994) 5136–5154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.530746

1994 doi
[10]

Lattice cohomology and q-series invariants of 3-manifolds

R. Akhmechet, P. K. Johnson, and V. Krushkal, “Lattice cohomology and q-series invariants of 3-manifolds.” 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.14139. 48

2023 arXiv
[11]

On categorification of Stokes coefficients in Chern-Simons theory,

S. Gukov and P. Putrov, “On categorification of Stokes coefficients in Chern-Simons theory,” ��
[12]

Knot lattice homology and q-series invariants for plumbed knot complements,

R. Akhmechet, P. K. Johnson, and S. Park, “Knot lattice homology and q-series invariants for plumbed knot complements,” Quantum Topology (2025)

2025
[13]

On gluing and splitting series invariants of plumbed 3-manifolds

A. H. Moore and N. Tarasca, “On gluing and splitting series invariants of plumbed 3-manifolds.” 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06515

2025 arXiv
[14]

Quantum modular forms,

D. Zagier, “Quantum modular forms,” Quanta of maths 11 no. 659-675, (2010) 5

2010
[15]

Three-manifold quantum invariants and mock theta functions,

M. C. N. Cheng, F. Ferrari, and G. Sgroi, “Three-manifold quantum invariants and mock theta functions,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 378 no. 2163, (2020) 20180439

2020
[16]

A two-variable series for knot complements,

S. Gukov and C. Manolescu, “A two-variable series for knot complements,” Quantum Topology 12 no. 1, (2021) 1–109

2021
[17]

”inverted state sums, inverted habiro series, and indefinite theta functions

S. Park, “”inverted state sums, inverted habiro series, and indefinite theta functions”.” 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.03942

2021 arXiv
[18]

Zwegers, Mock Theta Functions

S. Zwegers, Mock Theta Functions. PhD thesis, Utrecht University, 2008. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:273524062

2008
[19]

Resurgence in complex Chern-Simons theory,

S. Gukov, M. Marino, and P. Putrov, “Resurgence in complex Chern-Simons theory,” ��
[20]

Going to the Other Side via the Resurgent Bridge,

O. Costin, G. V. Dunne, A. Gruen, and S. Gukov, “Going to the Other Side via the Resurgent Bridge,” ��
[21]

Instanton homology of Seifert fibred homology three spheres,

R. Fintushel and R. J. Stern, “Instanton homology of Seifert fibred homology three spheres,” Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 3 no. 1, (1990) 109–137

1990
[22]

Representation spaces of Seifert fibered homology spheres,

P. A. Kirk and E. P. Klassen, “Representation spaces of Seifert fibered homology spheres,” Topology 30 no. 1, (1991) 77–95

1991
[23]

The SL(2 , � ) Casson invariant for Seifert fibered homology spheres and surgeries on twist knots,

H. U. Boden and C. L. Curtis, “The SL(2 , � ) Casson invariant for Seifert fibered homology spheres and surgeries on twist knots,” Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications 15 no. 07, (2006) 813–837

2006
[24]

CountingSL(2, � ) connections on Seifert-fibered spaces

J. Mu˜ noz-Ech´ aniz, “CountingSL(2, � ) connections on Seifert-fibered spaces.” 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2503.16370

2025 arXiv
[25]

Resurgence Analysis of Quantum Invariants of Seifert Fibered Homology Spheres

J. E. Andersen and W. E. Misteg ˚ ard, “Resurgence Analysis of Quantum Invariants of Seifert Fibered Homology Spheres.” 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/1811.05376

2020 arXiv
[26]

Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories,

J. L. Cardy, “Operator content of two-dimensional conformally invariant theories,” Nuclear Physics B 270 (1986) 186–204

1986
[27]

ceff for 3D � =2 theories,

S. Gukov and M. Jagadale, “ ceff for 3D � =2 theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 39 no. 33, (2024) 2446012, ��

2024
[28]

Universal bound on effective central charge and its saturation,

A. Karch, Y. Kusuki, H. Ooguri, H.-Y. Sun, and M. Wang, “Universal bound on effective central charge and its saturation,” Physical review letters 133 no. 9, (2024) 091604. 49

2024
[29]

ceff from Resurgence at the Stokes Line

G. Adams, O. Costin, G. V. Dunne, S. Gukov, and O. ¨Oner, “ceff from Resurgence at the Stokes Line.” 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.10112

2025 arXiv
[30]

M. P. Knapp, Forms in many variables over p-adic fields . PhD thesis, University of Michigan, 2000

2000
[31]

Monstrous moonshine and monstrous Lie superalgebras,

R. E. Borcherds, “Monstrous moonshine and monstrous Lie superalgebras,” Invent. Math. 109 no. 1, (1992) 405–444

1992
[32]

A Farey Tail for Attractor Black Holes,

J. de Boer, M. C. N. Cheng, R. Dijkgraaf, J. Manschot, and E. Verlinde, “A Farey Tail for Attractor Black Holes,” JHEP 11 (2006) 024, ��

2006
[33]

Donaldson-Witten theory and indefinite theta functions,

G. Korpas and J. Manschot, “Donaldson-Witten theory and indefinite theta functions,” JHEP 11 (2017) 083, ��

2017
[34]

Residues, modularity, and the Cardy limit of the 4d N = 4 superconformal index,

K. Goldstein, V. Jejjala, Y. Lei, S. van Leuven, and W. Li, “Residues, modularity, and the Cardy limit of the 4d N = 4 superconformal index,” JHEP 04 (2021) 216, ��

2021
[35]

Scaling black holes and modularity,

A. Chattopadhyaya, J. Manschot, and S. Mondal, “Scaling black holes and modularity,” JHEP 03 (2022) 001, ��

2022
[36]

Jacobi forms and the structure of Donaldson invariants for 4-manifolds with b+ = 1

L. G¨ ottsche and D. Zagier, “Jacobi forms and the structure of Donaldson invariants for 4-manifolds with b+ = 1.” 1996. https://arxiv.org/abs/alg-geom/9612020

1996 arXiv
[37]

Indefinite theta series and generalized error functions,

S. Alexandrov, S. Banerjee, J. Manschot, and B. Pioline, “Indefinite theta series and generalized error functions,” Selecta Mathematica 24 no. 5, (Sept., 2018) 3927–3972. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00029-018-0444-9

2018 doi
[38]

Cobordism Invariants from BPS q-Series,

S. Gukov, S. Park, and P. Putrov, “Cobordism Invariants from BPS q-Series,” Annales Henri Poincar´ e22 no. 12, (July, 2021) 4173–4203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00023-021-01089-2

2021 doi
[39]

On the ∆ � invariants in non-perturbative complex Chern-Simons theory

S. Harichurn, “On the ∆ � invariants in non-perturbative complex Chern-Simons theory.” 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11298

2024
[40]

Delta invariants of plumbed 3-manifolds

S. Harichurn, A. N´ emethi, and J. Svoboda, “Delta invariants of plumbed 3-manifolds.” 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02042

2024
[41]

Log-concavity of the partition function,

S. ”DeSalvo and I. Pak, “Log-concavity of the partition function,” The Ramanujan Journal 38 (2015) 61–73

2015
[42]

Orientation Reversal and the Chern-Simons Natural Boundary,

G. Adams, O. Costin, G. V. Dunne, S. Gukov, and O. ¨Oner, “Orientation Reversal and the Chern-Simons Natural Boundary,” ��
[43]

Plum, a Sage Module

P. K. Johnson, “Plum, a Sage Module.” 2023. https://peterkj1.github.io/plum/plum.html#plum.Plumbing.zhat. 50

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants,

S. Gukov, D. Pei, P. Putrov, and C. Vafa, “BPS spectra and 3-manifold invariants,” Journal of Knot Theory and Its Ramifications 29 no. 02, (2020) 2040003

work page 2020

[2] [2]

3d Modularity,

M. C. N. Cheng, S. Chun, F. Ferrari, S. Gukov, and S. M. Harrison, “3d Modularity,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 no. 10, (2019) 1–95

work page 2019

[3] [3]

Higher rank ˆZ and F� ,

S. Park, “Higher rank ˆZ and F� ,” SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry: Methods and Applications 16 (2020) 044

work page 2020

[4] [4]

Refined and Generalized ˆZ Invariants for Plumbed 3-Manifolds,

S. J. Ri, “Refined and Generalized ˆZ Invariants for Plumbed 3-Manifolds,” SIGMA 19 (2023) 011, ��

work page 2023

[5] [5]

ˆZ� for plumbed manifolds and splice diagrams,

S. Gukov, L. Katzarkov, and J. Svoboda, “ ˆZ� for plumbed manifolds and splice diagrams,” ��

work page

[6] [6]

Quantum Modular bZ� -Invariants,

M. C. N. Cheng, I. Coman, D. Passaro, and G. Sgroi, “Quantum Modular bZ� -Invariants,” SIGMA 20 (2024) 018, ��

work page 2024

[7] [7]

3d Modularity Revisited,

M. C. N. Cheng, I. Coman, P. Kucharski, D. Passaro, and G. Sgroi, “3d Modularity Revisited,” ��

work page

[8] [8]

Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev invariants and homological blocks for plumbed homology spheres,

Y. Murakami, “Witten–Reshetikhin–Turaev invariants and homological blocks for plumbed homology spheres,” Commun. Num. Theor. Phys. 18 no. 2, (2024) 371–403, ��

work page 2024