Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 60 references

System design and realisation towards optimising secure key bits in free space QKD

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a free-space BB84 link yields more secure key bits when the receiver's temporal acceptance window is tuned, when error estimation uses random rather than sequential sampling of sifted bits, and when an entrapped-pulse

desk verdict A QKD engineering abstract with a useful practical focus, but the EPCD rate-boost claim is load-bearing and currently lacks any security argument in the visible text. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10458 v1 pith:BKZYQ5WL submitted 2025-08-14 quant-ph physics.optics

Pooja Chandravanshi , Jayanth Ramakrishnan , Tanya Sharma , Ayan Biswas , Ravindra P. Singh This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phphysics.optics
keywords quantumkeydistributionBB84free-spaceQKDtemporalwindowoptimisationbiterrorraterandomsamplingentrappedpulsecoincidencedetectionsecure
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that the number of secure key bits a free-space BB84 link can produce depends on three engineering choices that sit outside the protocol's quantum layer: the temporal window used to accept detector clicks, the way sifted bits are sampled for error estimation, and the addition of an Entrapped Pulse Coincidence Detection (EPCD) stage. It reports that window width trades key rate against quantum bit error rate (QBER), that random sampling of sifted bits estimates errors more reliably than sequential sampling, and that EPCD raises key generation rates. The paper also presents a hardware-friendly sifting algorithm and positions the calibration, synchronisation, and alignment procedures as reusable across QKD protocols. If these claims hold, operators can increase secure key output by adjusting receiver and post-processing parameters rather than changing the quantum protocol.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the receiver's temporal decision process: the width of the window within which a detection is counted as a valid sifted bit, the rule for choosing which sifted bits go into error estimation, and the additional coincidence criterion introduced by EPCD. These choices determine how many raw clicks become candidate key bits and how accurately the error rate is known, which together set the fraction of sifted bits that survive privacy amplification as secure key.

What would settle it

On a real free-space link, sweep the receiver's temporal acceptance window across its full range while recording QBER and the final secure key rate after privacy amplification, and compare random versus sequential error sampling over many runs. The claim fails if no interior window keeps QBER below threshold while key rate is near its maximum, or if sequential sampling matches random sampling in estimation error. For EPCD, compare the final secure key rate with the stage disabled versus enabled at the same loss; if the enabled system produces no secure key where plain BB84 still does, the boos

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the useful output of a practical QKD system is set as much by receiver timing and post-processing choices as by the protocol's security proof. For a free-space BB84 implementation, the paper reports that an optimal temporal acceptance window exists at which key rate and QBER are jointly acceptable, that estimating the error rate from randomly selected sifted bits is more dependable than taking a consecutive block, and that integrating EPCD increases key generation rates. The stated intent is to provide a systematic implementation framework, with a simple sifting algorithm that can run in hardware, whose calibration and synchronisation practices carry over to protoco

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that adding the EPCD coincidence stage to BB84 does not leak information about the key and preserves BB84's security conditions; if the coincidence rule correlates with the basis or the key, the extra bits are not secure key.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A free-space BB84 link can be tuned to an operating point where the temporal window keeps QBER below the security threshold while key rate stays near its maximum.
  • Random sampling of sifted bits for error estimation is reported as more reliable than sequential sampling, so practical post-processing should adopt it.
  • Integrating the EPCD coincidence stage is reported to raise key generation rates without changing the BB84 protocol itself.
  • The hardware-friendly sifting algorithm and the calibration, synchronisation, and alignment procedures form a template the paper says is reusable across QKD protocols.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial: If random sampling is truly more reliable, the advantage should grow when errors arrive in bursts, for example under atmospheric turbulence; this could be tested by comparing both sampling rules under fluctuating channel loss.
  • Editorial: The EPCD rate increase counts as a secure-key increase only under a security proof that covers the coincidence rule. The paper does not supply that proof, so this part of the claim is conditional.
  • Editorial: The optimal temporal window will likely shift with detector jitter, pulse width, and link distance, so the paper's contribution is a scan-and-tune method rather than a universal setting.
  • Editorial: Temporal gating of raw detection events is common to other prepare-and-measure and measurement-device-independent schemes, so the reported behaviour may transfer, but that transfer is an extrapolation, not a demonstrated result.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript, based on the provided material (title page and abstract), presents a practical framework for implementing free-space BB84 QKD, covering device calibration, synchronization, optical alignment, and post-processing. The abstract makes three central claims: (1) appropriate selection of the temporal detection window optimizes both key rate and QBER, (2) random sampling of sifted key bits for error estimation is more reliable than sequential sampling, and (3) integrating the Entrapped Pulse Coincidence Detection (EPCD) protocol boosts key generation rates. These claims are presented as results, but the visible material contains no experimental data, derivation, error analysis, or detailed methodology. The abstract states the results qualitatively without quantitative support or references to specific figures, tables, or proofs.

Significance. If fully substantiated, the work could be valuable for practical QKD deployments by providing engineering guidelines and potentially increasing secure key rates in free-space links. However, the significance cannot be evaluated from the abstract alone. The claims are load-bearing: the purported improvements in key rate and QBER, the statistical advantage of random sampling, and especially the EPCD-induced secure-key increase require experimental validation and a security argument. The abstract does not provide these, so the contribution's validity remains unestablished.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The claim that 'selecting the temporal window to optimise both the key rate and the QBER' is a result is unsupported. No data, error bars, or comparison baseline are given. More seriously, if the temporal window is optimized using the same key-rate and QBER metrics it is then claimed to improve, the improvement may be an artifact of fitting unless an independent validation set or a clearly defined optimization criterion is specified. The manuscript must describe the optimization procedure and show that the reported performance is not overfitted to the test data.
  2. [Abstract (EPCD)] The statement 'We also integrate the Entrapped Pulse Coincidence Detection (EPCD) protocol to boost key generation rates' is a central claim without any supporting mechanism, quantification, or security proof. For the boost to count as an increase in *secure* key bits, the EPCD post-selection must be independent of the encoded basis and bit value, and it must not leak information through timing, detector dead time, or efficiency correlations. The abstract does not mention any such condition or analysis. Without a security argument, the claim that EPCD increases the secure key rate is unjustified.
  3. [Abstract (random sampling)] The assertion that 'random sampling of the sifted key bits for error estimation yields more reliable results than sequential sampling' is presented as a general fact, but it is not true without assumptions. Random sampling is only more reliable under exchangeability or stationarity of the error process; sequential sampling can be equally or more reliable in the presence of drift. The manuscript must specify the reliability metric (e.g., variance, bias, confidence-interval coverage) and provide a proof or simulation study. As stated, the claim is not supported.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'Entrapped Pulse Coincidence Detection' is introduced without a reference or definition. Please cite the original protocol or explain the acronym at first use.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'future-proof security' is vague and may be misleading; QKD security is typically information-theoretic under assumptions. Consider clarifying what is meant.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract says 'Our results highlight...' but no results or evidence are presented in the visible portion of the manuscript. The abstract should either summarize specific quantitative findings or indicate the type of evidence provided in the body.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identifiable from abstract-only excerpt

full rationale

The provided manuscript excerpt contains only the abstract and first-page header. No derivation chain, equations, parameter-fitting procedure, or self-citation is present in this excerpt, so there is no basis to exhibit a specific reduction of a 'prediction' to its inputs. The claims about temporal-window selection and random sampling are empirical statements that would require the full results section to evaluate; the EPCD claim is unsupported but lack of support is not circularity. Under the hard rule that circularity must be demonstrated by quoting a reduction within the paper, no such demonstration is possible from the available text. Score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The ledger is constructed from the abstract alone. The temporal window is the main visible free parameter, optimized against the same key-rate and QBER metrics it is claimed to improve. Security and statistical-exchangeability assumptions are domain assumptions inherited from the BB84 setting and sampling theory.

free parameters (2)
  • Temporal detection window (width and position) = not stated in abstract
    The abstract says the window is selected to optimize key rate and QBER, implying it is a tunable parameter fitted to measured performance.
  • Error-estimation sample size/fraction = not stated in abstract
    Random versus sequential sampling comparison requires a chosen sample size; the abstract does not report it.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption BB84 security model remains valid under the implemented device imperfections
    The abstract's 'secure key bits' language presumes standard QKD security assumptions, such as basis independence and trusted devices, hold in the practical setup.
  • domain assumption Measured QBER and key rate are statistically representative of the channel
    All claimed optimizations depend on the measurements; the abstract does not discuss detector noise, dead time, or time-varying channel effects.
  • standard math Random sampling without replacement yields an unbiased estimate of the true QBER
    The claimed advantage of random over sequential sampling is an elementary sampling-theory result, valid only if errors are not strongly time-correlated.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of System design and realisation towards optimising secure key bits in free space QKD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BKZYQ5WL

@misc{pith2026250810458,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: System design and realisation towards optimising secure key bits in free space QKD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BKZYQ5WL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10458}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum Key Distribution (QKD) is rapidly transitioning from cutting-edge laboratory research to real-world deployment in established communication networks. Although QKD promises future-proof security, practical challenges stil exist due to imperfections in physical devices. Many protocols offer strong security guarantees, but their implementation can be complex and difficult. To bridge this gap, we present a practical and systematic framework for implementing QKD, focused on the BB84 protocol but designed with broader applicability in mind. The article includes key concepts for device calibration, synchronisation,optical alignment, and key post-processing. We outline a simple algorithm for key sifting that is easily implementable in hardware. Our results highlight the importance of selecting the temporal window to optimise both the key rate and the quantum bit error rate (QBER). In addition, we show that random sampling of the sifted key bits for error estimation yields more reliable results than sequential sampling. We also integrate the Entrapped Pulse Coincidence Detection (EPCD) protocol to boost key generation rates, further enhancing performance. Although our work focuses on BB84, the techniques and practices outlined are general enough to support a wide range of QKD protocols. This makes our framework a valuable tool for both research and real-world deployment of secure quantum communication systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bennett, G

    C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing . Theoretical Computer Science 560(P1), 7--11 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025. ://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0304397514004241

    doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2014.05.025 2014

  2. [2]

    Pan, Y.C

    D. Pan, Y.C. Liu, P. Niu, H. Zhang, F. Zhang, M. Wang, X.T. Song, X. Chen, C. Zheng, G.L. Long, Simultaneous transmission of information and key exchange using the same photonic quantum states. Science Advances 11(8), eadt4627 (2025)

    work page 2025

  3. [3]

    Pan, X.T

    D. Pan, X.T. Song, G.L. Long, Free-space quantum secure direct communication: Basics, progress, and outlook. Advanced Devices & Instrumentation 4, 0004 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Abdullah, M.Z

    M. Abdullah, M.Z. Jamaludin, G. Witjaksono, M. Mokhtar, A new design of pulsed laser diode driver system for multistate quantum key distribution. Optics & Laser Technology 43(5), 978--983 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    Y. Zhu, X. Wang, C. Zhu, Z. Chen, Z. Huang, Z. Jin, Y. Li, F. Liang, S. Liao, C. Peng, et al., A laser source driver in 0.18 m sige bicmos technology for high speed quantum key distribution. AIP Advances 12(12) (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Martin, B

    A. Martin, B. Sanguinetti, C.C.W. Lim, R. Houlmann, H. Zbinden, Quantum random number generation for 1.25-ghz quantum key distribution systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology 33(13), 2855--2859 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Q. Zhou, R. Valivarthi, C. John, W. Tittel, Practical quantum random-number generation based on sampling vacuum fluctuations. Quantum Engineering 1(1), e8 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Dynes, S

    J. Dynes, S. Kindness, S.B. Tam, A. Plews, A. Sharpe, M. Lucamarini, B. Fr \"o hlich, Z. Yuan, R. Penty, A. Shields, Quantum key distribution over multicore fiber. Optics express 24(8), 8081--8087 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    C. Cai, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, P. Zhang, J. Niu, Y. Ji, Experimental wavelength-space division multiplexing of quantum key distribution with classical optical communication over multicore fiber. Optics express 27(4), 5125--5135 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Chou, V.N

    H.f. Chou, V.N. Ha, H. Al-Hraishawi, L.M. Garces-Socarras, J.L. Gonzalez-Rios, J.C. Merlano-Duncan, S. Chatzinotas, Satellite-based quantum network: Security and challenges over atmospheric channel. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00011 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  3. [11]

    N. Jain, C. Wittmann, L. Lydersen, C. Wiechers, D. Elser, C. Marquardt, V. Makarov, G. Leuchs, Device calibration impacts security of quantum key distribution. Physical Review Letters 107(11), 110501 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Fei, X.D

    Y.Y. Fei, X.D. Meng, M. Gao, H. Wang, Z. Ma, Quantum man-in-the-middle attack on the calibration process of quantum key distribution. Scientific reports 8(1), 4283 (2018)

    2018

  5. [13]

    Miller, Time synchronization in satellite quantum key distribution

    A.V. Miller, Time synchronization in satellite quantum key distribution. Problems of Information Transmission 59(4), 225--238 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    Krause, N

    J. Krause, N. Walenta, J. Hilt, R. Freund, Clock-offset recovery with sublinear complexity enables synchronization on low-level hardware for quantum key distribution. Physical Review Applied 23(4), 044015 (2025)

    2025

  7. [15]

    Zhang, J

    H.F. Zhang, J. Wang, K. Cui, C.L. Luo, S.Z. Lin, L. Zhou, H. Liang, T.Y. Chen, K. Chen, J.W. Pan, A real-time qkd system based on fpga. Journal of Lightwave Technology 30(20), 3226--3234 (2012)

    2012

  8. [16]

    Q. Shen, S. Liao, S. Liu, J. Wang, W. Liu, C. Peng, Q. An, An fpga-based tdc for free space quantum key distribution. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 60(5), 3570--3577 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Yang, Z.G

    S.S. Yang, Z.G. Lu, Y.M. Li, High-speed post-processing in continuous-variable quantum key distribution based on fpga implementation. Journal of Lightwave Technology 38(15), 3935--3941 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    Stanco, F.B

    A. Stanco, F.B. Santagiustina, L. Calderaro, M. Avesani, T. Bertapelle, D. Dequal, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, Versatile and concurrent fpga-based architecture for practical quantum communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering 3, 1--8 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Bennett, G

    C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, Experimental quantum cryptography: the dawn of a new era for quantum cryptography: the experimental prototype is working]. SIGACT News 20(4), 78–80 (1989). doi:10.1145/74074.74087. ://doi.org/10.1145/74074.74087

    1989

  12. [20]

    Lucamarini, Z.L

    M. Lucamarini, Z.L. Yuan, J.F. Dynes, A.J. Shields, Overcoming the rate--distance limit of quantum key distribution without quantum repeaters. Nature 557(7705), 400--403 (2018). doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0066-6. ://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0066-6

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    a nger, N. L \

    R. All \'e aume, C. Branciard, J. Bouda, T. Debuisschert, M. Dianati, N. Gisin, M. Godfrey, P. Grangier, T. L \"a nger, N. L \"u tkenhaus, et al., Using quantum key distribution for cryptographic purposes: a survey. Theoretical Computer Science 560, 62--81 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Diamanti, H.K

    E. Diamanti, H.K. Lo, B. Qi, Z. Yuan, Practical challenges in quantum key distribution. npj Quantum Information 2(1), 1--12 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Kim, Y.C

    Y.S. Kim, Y.C. Jeong, Y.H. Kim, Implementation of polarization-coded free-space bb84 quantum key distribution. Laser Physics 18, 810--814 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    Schmitt-Manderbach, H

    T. Schmitt-Manderbach, H. Weier, M. F \"u rst, R. Ursin, F. Tiefenbacher, T. Scheidl, J. Perdigues, Z. Sodnik, C. Kurtsiefer, J.G. Rarity, et al., Experimental demonstration of free-space decoy-state quantum key distribution over 144 km. Physical Review Letters 98(1), 010504 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Namazi, G

    M. Namazi, G. Vallone, B. Jordaan, C. Goham, R. Shahrokhshahi, P. Villoresi, E. Figueroa, Free-space quantum communication with a portable quantum memory. Physical Review Applied 8(6), 064013 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    Sibson, C

    P. Sibson, C. Erven, M. Godfrey, S. Miki, T. Yamashita, M. Fujiwara, M. Sasaki, H. Terai, M.G. Tanner, C.M. Natarajan, et al., Chip-based quantum key distribution. Nature communications 8(1), 13984 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Huang, X

    J. Huang, X. Chen, X. Li, J. Wang, Chip-based photonic graph states. AAPPS Bulletin 33(1), 14 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Y. Luo, X. Cheng, H.K. Mao, Q. Li, An overview of postprocessing in quantum key distribution. Mathematics (2227-7390) 12(14) (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    L \"u tkenhaus, M

    N. L \"u tkenhaus, M. Jahma, Quantum key distribution with realistic states: photon-number statistics in the photon-number splitting attack. New Journal of Physics 4(1), 44 (2002)

    2002

  22. [30]

    X. Ma, B. Qi, Y. Zhao, H.K. Lo, Practical decoy state for quantum key distribution. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics 72(1), 012326 (2005)

    2005

  23. [31]

    Nauerth, M

    S. Nauerth, M. F \"u rst, T. Schmitt-Manderbach, H. Weier, H. Weinfurter, Information leakage via side channels in freespace bb84 quantum cryptography. New Journal of Physics 11(6), 065001 (2009)

    2009

  24. [32]

    Arteaga-D \' az, D

    P. Arteaga-D \' az, D. Cano, V. Fernandez, Practical side-channel attack on free-space qkd systems with misaligned sources and countermeasures. IEEE Access 10, 82697--82705 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    A. Miller, Micius, the world’s first quantum communication satellite, was hackable, in 2025 International Conference on Quantum Communications, Networking, and Computing (QCNC) (IEEE, 2025), pp. 411--415

    2025

  26. [34]

    Sharma, R

    T. Sharma, R. Bhavsar, J. Ramakrishnan, P. Chandravanshi, S. Prabhakar, A. Biswas, R. Singh, Enhancing key rates of qkd protocol by coincidence detection. Advanced Quantum Technologies p. 2400685 (2025)

    2025

  27. [35]

    Avesani, L

    M. Avesani, L. Calderaro, G. Foletto, C. Agnesi, F. Picciariello, F. Santagiustina, A. Scriminich, A. Stanco, F. Vedovato, M. Zahidy, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, A resource-effective QKD field-trial in Padua with the iPOGNAC encoder, in Optical Fiber Communication Conference (OF...

    2021 doi

  28. [36]

    H. Ko, B.S. Choi, J.S. Choe, K.J. Kim, J.H. Kim, C.J. Youn, Critical side channel effects in random bit generation with multiple semiconductor lasers in a polarization-based quantum key distribution system. Optics express 25(17), 20045--20055 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Biswas, A

    A. Biswas, A. Banerji, P. Chandravanshi, R. Kumar, R.P. Singh, Experimental side channel analysis of bb84 qkd source. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 57(6), 1--7 (2021). doi:10.1109/JQE.2021.3111332

    2021

  30. [38]

    Basso Basset, M

    F. Basso Basset, M. Valeri, E. Roccia, V. Muredda, D. Poderini, J. Neuwirth, N. Spagnolo, M.B. Rota, G. Carvacho, F. Sciarrino, et al., Quantum key distribution with entangled photons generated on demand by a quantum dot. Science advances 7(12), eabe6379 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Zahidy, M.T

    M. Zahidy, M.T. Mikkelsen, R. M \"u ller, B. Da Lio, M. Krehbiel, Y. Wang, N. Bart, A.D. Wieck, A. Ludwig, M. Galili, et al., Quantum key distribution using deterministic single-photon sources over a field-installed fibre link. npj Quantum Information 10(1), 2 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Kumazawa, T

    M. Kumazawa, T. Sasaki, M. Koashi, Rigorous characterization method for photon-number statistics. Optics Express 27(4), 5297--5313 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Sharma, A

    T. Sharma, A. Biswas, J. Ramakrishnan, P. Chandravanshi, R.P. Singh, Mitigating the source-side channel vulnerability by characterisation of photon statistics. Journal of Lightwave Technology (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    B. Heim, D. Elser, T. Bartley, M. Sabuncu, C. Wittmann, D. Sych, C. Marquardt, G. Leuchs, Atmospheric channel characteristics for quantum communication with continuous polarization variables. Applied Physics B 98, 635--640 (2010)

    2010

  35. [43]

    Vasylyev, A

    D. Vasylyev, A. Semenov, W. Vogel, Characterization of free-space quantum channels, in Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging XVI, vol. 10771 (SPIE, 2018), pp. 133--148

    2018

  36. [44]

    Mishra, A

    S. Mishra, A. Biswas, S. Patil, P. Chandravanshi, V. Mongia, T. Sharma, A. Rani, S. Prabhakar, S. Ramachandran, R.P. Singh, Bbm92 quantum key distribution over a free space dusty channel of 200 meters. Journal of Optics 24(7), 074002 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    Jabir, G.K

    M. Jabir, G.K. Samanta, Robust, high brightness, degenerate entangled photon source at room temperature. Scientific reports 7(1), 12613 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Zhang, P.J

    Y. Zhang, P.J. Coles, A. Winick, J. Lin, N. L \"u tkenhaus, Security proof of practical quantum key distribution with detection-efficiency mismatch. Physical Review Research 3(1), 013076 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    Sharma, A

    T. Sharma, A. Biswas, P. Chandravanshi, S. Prabhakar, R.P. Singh, Vulnerability in free space qkd due to detection coupling mismatch. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 59(6), 1--7 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Bienfang, A.J

    J.C. Bienfang, A.J. Gross, A. Mink, B.J. Hershman, A. Nakassis, X. Tang, R. Lu, D.H. Su, C.W. Clark, C.J. Williams, et al., Quantum key distribution with 1.25 gbps clock synchronization. Optics Express 12(9), 2011--2016 (2004)

    2011

  41. [49]

    Erven, C

    C. Erven, C. Couteau, R. Laflamme, G. Weihs, Entangled quantum key distribution over two free-space optical links. Optics express 16(21), 16840--16853 (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    Berra, C

    F. Berra, C. Agnesi, A. Stanco, M. Avesani, M. Kuklewski, D. Matter, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, Synchronization of quantum communications over an optical classical communications channel. Applied Optics 62(30), 7994--7999 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Uhring, C.V

    W. Uhring, C.V. Zint, J. Bartringer, A low-cost high-repetition-rate picosecond laser diode pulse generator, in Semiconductor lasers and laser dynamics, vol. 5452 (SPIE, 2004), pp. 583--590

    2004

  44. [52]

    Mongia, A

    V. Mongia, A. Kumar, S. Prabhakar, A. Banerji, R. Singh, Investigating device-independent quantum random number generation. Physics Letters A 526, 129954 (2024)

    2024

  45. [53]

    Akhshani, A

    A. Akhshani, A. Akhavan, A. Mobaraki, S.C. Lim, Z. Hassan, Pseudo random number generator based on quantum chaotic map. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 19(1), 101--111 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Chandravanshi, J.K

    P. Chandravanshi, J.K. Meka, V. Mongia, R.P. Singh, S. Prabhakar, Lfsr based rng on low cost fpga for qkd applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.16431 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Shingala, N

    F.P. Shingala, N. Venkatachalam, P. Chandravanshi, R.P. Singh, et al., Real time qkd post processing based on reconfigurable hardware acceleration. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.17019 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Biswas, A

    A. Biswas, A. Banerji, N. Lal, P. Chandravanshi, R. Kumar, R.P. Singh, Quantum key distribution with multiphoton pulses: an advantage. Optics Continuum 1(1), 68--79 (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    A. Mink, A. Nakassis, Ldpc for qkd reconciliation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.4977 (2012)

    2012 arXiv

  50. [58]

    B.Y. Tang, B. Liu, Y.P. Zhai, C.Q. Wu, W.R. Yu, High-speed and large-scale privacy amplification scheme for quantum key distribution. Scientific reports 9(1), 15733 (2019)

    2019

  51. [59]

    sn-aps.bst

    FUNCTION identify.aps.version "sn-aps.bst" " [2024/07/19 v1.1 APS bibliography style]" * top ENTRY address author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eid howpublished institution journal key keywords month note number organization pages publisher school series title type url ...

    2024

  52. [60]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION if.digit duplicate "0" = swap duplicate "1" = swap duplicate "2" = swap duplicate "3" = swap duplicate "4" = swap duplicate "5" = swap duplicate "6" = swap duplicate "7" = swap duplicate "8" = swap "9" = or or or or or or...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.