A Suspended 4H-Silicon Carbide Membrane Platform for Defect Integration into Quantum Devices

Aaron M. Day; Amberly H. Xie; Chang Jin; Chaoshen Zhang; Eliana Mann; Evelyn L. Hu; Jonathan R. Dietz; Marko Loncar; Zhujing Xu

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 60 references

A Suspended 4H-Silicon Carbide Membrane Platform for Defect Integration into Quantum Devices

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new 4H-SiC fabrication route suspends a monolithic membrane first and then patterns devices on it, cutting electron-beam proximity-effect errors and enabling hybrid quantum structures without wafer bonding or grinding.

desk verdict A solid fabrication paper whose central structural claim is credible and useful; the proximity-effect advantage is plausible but not nailed down, and the title overpromises defect integration. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.10814 v1 pith:KGVORO4E submitted 2025-08-14 physics.app-ph

Amberly H. Xie , Aaron M. Day , Jonathan R. Dietz , Chang Jin , Chaoshen Zhang , Eliana Mann , Zhujing Xu , Marko Loncar

show 1 more author

Evelyn L. Hu

This is my paper · ORCID

classification physics.app-ph

keywords 4H-siliconcarbidesuspendedmembranesphotoelectrochemicaletchingphotoniccrystalcavitiesthin-filmlithiumniobatephononicelectron-beamproximityeffectquantumdefectintegration

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish a better way to build suspended 4H-SiC quantum devices: instead of patterning devices in bulk material and undercutting them later, first suspend a thin membrane from a monolithic wafer using photoelectrochemical etching, then fabricate devices directly on the suspended film. The authors argue that patterning on a suspended membrane reduces electron backscattering and therefore lowers proximity-effect fabrication errors, simplifying lithography and improving feature fidelity. If correct, this approach removes the need for wafer bonding, grinding, and chemical-mechanical polishing, while also surviving high-temperature annealing and allowing heterogeneous integration with thin-film lithium niobate. As proof of concept, they fabricate 1D photonic crystal cavities, tapered-fiber-coupled cavities, and a TFLN-on-SiC acoustic resonator, showing quality factors in the low thousands and compatibility with subsequent color-center integration. The broader significance is a more flexible, scalable fabrication route for point-defect-based quantum technologies in silicon carbide.

What carries the argument

The central object is the suspended 4H-SiC membrane formed by photoelectrochemical (PEC) etching: dopant-dependent band bending sends photogenerated holes to the n-type substrate and preserves the unintentionally doped epilayer, while two external biases (a substrate/electrolyte bias and an epilayer/substrate reverse bias) improve undercutting. Patterning devices directly on this already-suspended film removes the underlying backscattering target for the electron beam, which is the mechanism claimed to reduce proximity-effect-induced fabrication errors and to make lithography optimization simpler.

What would settle it

Write identical test features with identical electron-beam dose and no proximity-effect correction on suspended and nonsuspended 4H-SiC films, measuring feature dimensions across many samples with reported error bars; if percent error is statistically identical, the claimed proximity-effect reduction is not the cause of the observed improvement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that fabricating devices after suspending a 4H-SiC membrane—rather than defining devices in bulk and undercutting them later—reduces electron-beam proximity effects during lithography. Because the suspended film has no underlying substrate to backscatter electrons, features patterned into the membrane show lower percent error and less sensitivity to feature size and orientation than identical patterning on nonsuspended material. The paper supports this with percent-error measurements comparing suspended and nonsuspended films, and demonstrates the platform with free-space scattering and tapered-waveguide 1D photonic crystal cavities, reaching quality factors of a few tho

Load-bearing premise

The claimed fabrication-error reduction rests on a single comparison in which electron-beam doses were chosen independently for suspended and nonsuspended devices, so if the lower error comes from dose calibration rather than reduced backscattering, the platform's key advantage is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Suspended 4H-SiC devices can be made without wafer bonding, grinding, or chemical-mechanical polishing, simplifying the fabrication of quantum-grade membranes and devices.
Patterning on suspended films reduces electron-beam proximity effects, so target feature sizes are achieved with lower percent error and less orientation bias, reducing calibration iterations.
The demonstrated 1D photonic crystal cavities reach quality factors of a few thousand, comparable to previously reported 4H-SiC PhCs, validating the etch fidelity of the suspended-first approach.
Monolithic membranes tolerate high-temperature annealing, opening paths to dopant activation and high-temperature activation of telecom emitters such as vanadium defects without thermal-mismatch damage.
Heterogeneous integration with thin-film lithium niobate produces fully suspended TFLN-on-SiC phononic cavities, offering a route to piezoelectric spin readout and acoustic spin control.
The platform supports waveguide and tapered-fiber interfaces, enabling scalable readout, photon transport, and entanglement between color-center qubits.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same suspend-then-pattern logic should transfer to other hard-to-etch wide-bandgap or refractory materials, because reduced backscattering is a geometric effect rather than a chemical one, though this remains to be demonstrated.
If the proximity-effect benefit is real, the platform should also improve feature fidelity at larger write fields and multi-scale devices, a consequence the paper does not directly test.
The combination of high-temperature annealing tolerance and TFLN integration points toward a single chip with telecom-emitting vanadium qubits acoustically coupled to lithium niobate transducers, an integration the paper motivates but does not yet realize.
A direct measurement of backscattered electron yield from suspended versus bulk membranes would isolate whether the fabrication benefit comes from the suspension itself or from other process differences; such a measurement is not reported.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

What you should know: this is a fabrication methods paper, not a defect-integration demonstration. The core move—undercut first, pattern afterward—is real, useful, and largely new. It avoids wafer bonding, grinding, and post-hoc undercutting, and it is compatible with high-temperature annealing and a heterogeneously stacked TFLN-on-SiC resonator. The cavity work is preliminary but functional: Q of a few thousand is comparable to earlier 4H-SiC photonic crystals, and the claim to the first tapered waveguide cavity in 4H-SiC looks fair—[49] demonstrates a waveguide-fiber interface, not a tapered cavity.

The paper is also honest in the right places. Process details are concrete, and the SI candidly walks through resist adhesion failures before settling on the carrier-wafer trick. The simulation repos are cited, and the PEC undercut method is their own prior work but cited openly; that is self-reference, not circularity.

Now the soft spots, in proportion. The proximity-effect advantage (Fig. 1d) is the weakest link. The comparison is confounded: doses were independently chosen for each condition to minimize error, there are no error bars or sample counts, and the metric is hole dimension rather than device-level performance. A skeptic could argue the suspended case simply got a better dose calibration. The physical mechanism is plausible—a 500 nm membrane with vacuum underneath should reduce long-range backscattering—but the figure does not isolate that mechanism from resist adhesion, charging, or vibration. That said, the paper does not fall apart if this comparison is weak: the fabrication sequence stands on its own.

The TFLN-on-SiC acoustic cavity is shown only by SEM with no measured mechanical response; if the pitch is spin-phonon coupling, that is a significant gap. And the title promises defect integration, but no defect is implanted, annealed, or measured anywhere in the paper. That is an overreach, not a fatal one, but the abstract and title should match the content.

Who gets value: process engineers working on SiC and people building suspended quantum devices in wide-bandgap materials. It deserves a serious referee—the platform is useful and the claims are testable with straightforward follow-up experiments: proper statistics for Fig. 1d, a mechanical characterization of the phononic cavity, and a title that says what was actually done. I would engage with it, and I would expect heavy revision before acceptance.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports a fabrication approach for suspended 4H-SiC devices: first, unintentionally doped epitaxial membranes are suspended using a previously reported photoelectrochemical (PEC) undercut method (with two added biases), and then photonic/phononic devices are patterned directly onto the suspended membranes via electron-beam lithography and dry etching. The authors claim that patterning on suspended membranes reduces secondary-electron backscattering and proximity-effect-induced dimensional errors. They demonstrate 1D photonic crystal cavities (free-space and tapered-waveguide-coupled) with room-temperature Q factors of a few thousand, and a thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) on SiC phononic-crystal structure. They also claim the monolithic platform withstands high-temperature annealing and allows heterogeneous integration.

Significance. If the proximity-effect advantage and the device demonstrations are borne out, the platform offers a practical route to suspended 4H-SiC quantum devices without wafer bonding, grinding, or post-etch undercutting. The paper provides detailed fabrication parameters and simulation repositories, and the cavity Q values are consistent with prior 4H-SiC PhC work. The use of the authors' own prior PEC method and simulation repositories is a normal continuation of previous work, not circular, since the central claim is tested by direct fabrication and measurement. However, the central differentiating claim—reduced proximity-effect-induced fabrication error on suspended membranes—rests on a single comparison (Fig. 1d) with a confounded dose protocol and no statistics. The acoustic-cavity demonstration lacks measured mechanical response. These points need to be strengthened before the stated advantages are accepted.

major comments (4)

[Fig. 1d and 'One major benefit' paragraph] The central claim that patterning on suspended membranes reduces proximity-effect-induced fabrication errors is not established by the presented data. The doses were independently chosen for each condition to minimize percent error (Fig. 1d caption), which confounds the physical backscattering effect with dose calibration. A fair test would use identical dose recipes or sweep dose across both conditions. Additionally, no error bars, number of devices/holes, or statistical tests are reported, so the observed difference could be within run-to-run variation. This is load-bearing because the claimed reduced proximity effect is the paper's primary differentiation from undercut-after-patterning methods.
[Fig. 1d and device-level relevance] The percent-error metric is based on hole dimensions in 1D PhCs after fabrication. This does not necessarily reflect device-level performance (cavity Q, resonance wavelength, collection efficiency) that matters for defect integration. The authors should either demonstrate that the reduced dimensional error translates into improved device metrics, or qualify the claim as only about lithographic dimensional control. The statement about 'reduced sensitivity to variations in feature size and orientation' is also not quantified (e.g., no slope or variance comparison).
[Fig. 4 and 'To this end' paragraph] The TFLN-on-SiC acoustic cavity is presented as a demonstration, but only SEM images are provided. No mechanical resonance spectrum, Q factor, or frequency response is shown. Without a measured mechanical mode, the structure is a fabricated phononic crystal, not a demonstrated cavity. The claim of obtaining 'fully suspended TFLN-on-SiC' is fine as a structural result, but the broader implication of an acoustic cavity should be explicitly limited to the fabricated geometry unless a resonance measurement is included.
[Figs. 2b and 3b] The cavity Q values are reported from single measurements without uncertainty, fit residuals, or number of devices. Since Q is used to argue the platform's viability (e.g., 'comparable with other 4H-SiC PhCs'), the lack of error bars and sample counts weakens the comparison. At minimum, report standard errors from repeated measurements or clarify that these are representative single devices.

minor comments (4)

[Abstract and conclusion] The abstract claims the platform 'support[s] high temperature annealing,' but the manuscript does not actually expose the suspended membranes to high temperatures post-suspension. This is presented as a projected advantage, not a demonstrated result. Please clarify this distinction.
[Fig. 1d caption] The caption says 'data taken by measuring holes from 1D PhCs' but does not specify the number of holes, devices, or independent fabrication runs. This information should be added to support the comparison.
[Methods, PEC etching] The two external biases are described as additions to the protocol in [31]. It would be helpful to state explicitly which aspects of the PEC process are new relative to [31], to avoid confusion about prior work.
[Conclusion, first reported tapered cavities] The claim of 'first reported demonstrations of tapered waveguide cavities in 4H-SiCs' is appropriately qualified, but given reference [49] recently demonstrated waveguide fiber interfaces in SiC, please double-check that this novelty claim is accurate and clearly scoped to 'tapered waveguide cavities.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are supported by direct fabrication and measurement, not by feeding the target result into the argument.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a fabrication approach: suspended 4H-SiC membranes are first formed by photoelectrochemical undercutting, and devices are subsequently patterned onto them. The asserted advantage of reduced proximity-effect error is supported by a direct empirical comparison in Fig. 1d, where percent errors of features written on suspended versus nonsuspended substrates are measured and compared. This is an experimental measurement, not a quantity derived from a fitted model, so there is no self-definitional or fitted-input-called-prediction circularity. The self-citations present—[31] for the PEC undercut method and [36, 38] for simulation repositories used in device design—are used as fabrication tools and design references, not as evidence that the central claim is true. Even if the dose-calibration confound noted in Fig. 1d weakens the proximity-effect advantage claim, that is a correctness/statistical concern, not circularity. The cavity quality factors and device demonstrations are independently measured. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or renamed known result is invoked in a load-bearing way. Therefore the analysis finds no circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced; this is a process demonstration. The free parameters are process conditions rather than model fits, listed because the central comparison depends on them and their values are incompletely specified.

free parameters (2)

electron beam dose for suspended vs nonsuspended patterning = 400-600 uC/cm2 (suspended); nonsuspended dose not uniquely specified
Doses in Fig 1d were independently chosen to minimize percent error, so the comparison is conditional on these hand-selected values.
PEC applied biases = not specified numerically
The two external biases (substrate/electrolyte and epilayer/substrate) are tuned to improve undercutting, but no values are given, making the process hard to reproduce exactly.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Under alkaline conditions and above-bandgap illumination, SiC dissolves via oxide formation and dissolution (Eqs. 1 and 2), with hole migration controlled by dopant-dependent band bending.
Used to justify PEC undercutting; standard semiconductor electrochemistry, not proven in this paper.
domain assumption Reduced electron backscattering from thinner underlying material reduces the proximity effect in electron-beam lithography.
Invoked to claim lower fabrication error on suspended membranes; physically plausible but not directly measured, only inferred from final feature sizes.
domain assumption Surface states at 650-750 nm originate from dangling bonds and surface oxide and can be used to characterize cavities.
Based on citations [13, 26, 37], not experimentally identified in this work.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Suspended 4H-Silicon Carbide Membrane Platform for Defect Integration into Quantum Devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/KGVORO4E

@misc{pith2026250810814,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Suspended 4H-Silicon Carbide Membrane Platform for Defect Integration into Quantum Devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/KGVORO4E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.10814}
}

read the original abstract

4H-silicon carbide is a promising platform for solid-state quantum technology due to its commercial availability as a wide bandgap semiconductor and ability to host numerous spin-active color centers. Integrating color centers into suspended nanodevices enhances defect control and readout--key advances needed to fully harness their potential. However, challenges in developing robust fabrication processes for 4H-SiC thin films--due to the material's chemical and mechanical stability--limit their implementation in quantum applications. Here, we report on a new fabrication approach that first synthesizes suspended thin films from a monolithic platform, then patterns devices. With this technique, we fabricate and characterize structures tailored for defect integration, demonstrating 1D photonic crystal cavities, with and without waveguide interfaces, and lithium niobate on 4H-SiC acoustic cavities. This approach allows for greater fabrication flexibility--supporting high temperature annealing and heterogeneous material platform compatibility--providing a versatile platform for scalable fabrication of 4H-SiC devices for quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.10814 by the authors.

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. a) SEM of tapered waveguide interfaced cavity fabri [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. a) SEM of 1D PhC fabricated by direct patterning [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. a) SEM of TFLN-SiC block tether cavity. Right image sh [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

[49]

K. Xia, F. Sardi, C. Sauerzapf, T. Kornher, H.-W. Becker, Z. Kis, L. Kovacs, D. Dertli, J. Foglszinger, R. Kolesov, et al. , Tunable microcavities coupled to rare- earth quantum emitters, Optica 9, 445 (2022)

work page 2022
[1]

A substrate/electrolyte bias (via a Pt counter elec- trode) to promote hole migration from the n-type substrate to the electrolyte

work page
[2]

Holes were generated by above bandgap UV illumination (500W Newport Hg/Xe lamp)

An epilayer/substrate reverse bias for etch selectiv- ity against the unintentionally-doped epilayer Hydroxide ions were provided by an aqueous solution of KOH (50-100 mM) which was ﬂowed continuously through the PEC cell via a peristaltic pump. Holes were generated by above bandgap UV illumination (500W Newport Hg/Xe lamp). Below bandgap light was ﬁltere...

work page
[3]

Castelletto, Silicon carbide single-photon sources: challenges and prospects, Materials for Quantum Tech- nology 1, 023001 (2021)

S. Castelletto, Silicon carbide single-photon sources: challenges and prospects, Materials for Quantum Tech- nology 1, 023001 (2021)

work page 2021
[4]

Aharonovich, D

I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single-photon emitters, Nature photonics 10, 631 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

M. E. Bathen and L. Vines, Manipulating single-photon emission from point defects in diamond and silicon carbide, Advanced Quantum Technologies 4, 2100003 (2021)

work page 2021
[6]

I. A. Khramtsov and D. Y. Fedyanin, Bright silicon car- bide single-photon emitting diodes at low temperatures: Toward quantum photonics applications, Nanomaterials 11, 3177 (2021)

work page 2021
[7]

J. R. Dietz, B. Jiang, A. M. Day, S. A. Bhave, and E. L. Hu, Spin-acoustic control of silicon vacancies in 4h silicon carbide, Nature Electronics 6, 739 (2023)

work page 2023

Show all 60 references

[8]

Castelletto, C

S. Castelletto, C. T. Lew, W.-X. Lin, and J.-S. Xu, Quan- tum systems in silicon carbide for sensing applications, Reports on Progress in Physics 87, 014501 (2023)

2023
[9]

Giovannetti, S

V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum- enhanced positioning and clock synchronization, Nature 412, 417 (2001)

2001
[10]

C. M. Knaut, A. Suleymanzade, Y.-C. Wei, D. R. As- sumpcao, P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, M. Sutula, G. Baranes, et al. , Entanglement of nanophotonic quantum memory nodes in a telecom net- work, Nature 629, 573 (2024)

2024
[11]

Bersin, M

E. Bersin, M. Sutula, Y. Q. Huan, A. Suleymanzade, D. R. Assumpcao, Y.-C. Wei, P.-J. Stas, C. M. Knaut, E. N. Knall, C. Langrock, et al., Telecom networking with a diamond quantum memory, PRX Quantum 5, 010303 (2024)

2024
[12]

P.-J. Stas, Y. Q. Huan, B. Machielse, E. N. Knall, A. Su- leymanzade, B. Pingault, M. Sutula, S. W. Ding, C. M. Knaut, D. R. Assumpcao, et al. , Robust multi-qubit quantum network node with integrated error detection, Science 378, 557 (2022)

2022
[13]

S. W. Ding, M. Haas, X. Guo, K. Kuruma, C. Jin, Z. Li, D. D. Awschalom, N. Delegan, F. J. Heremans, A. A. High, et al. , High-q cavity interface for color centers in thin ﬁlm diamond, nature communications 15, 6358 (2024)

2024
[14]

L. Zhou, C. Wang, A. Yi, C. Shen, Y. Zhu, K. Huang, M. Zhou, J. Zhang, and X. Ou, Photonic crystal nanobeam cavities based on 4h-silicon carbide on insu- lator, Chinese Optics Letters 20, 031302 (2022)

2022
[15]

S.-i. Sato, T. Honda, T. Makino, Y. Hijikata, S.-Y. Lee, and T. Ohshima, Room temperature electrical control of single photon sources at 4h-sic surface, ACS Photonics 5, 3159 (2018). 6

2018
[16]

A. M. Day, M. Sutula, J. R. Dietz, A. Raun, D. D. Sukachev, M. K. Bhaskar, and E. L. Hu, Electrical ma- nipulation of telecom color centers in silicon, Nature Communications 15, 4722 (2024)

2024
[17]

E. N. Knall, C. M. Knaut, R. Bekenstein, D. R. As- sumpcao, P. L. Stroganov, W. Gong, Y. Q. Huan, P.- J. Stas, B. Machielse, M. Chalupnik, et al. , Eﬃcient source of shaped single photons based on an integrated diamond nanophotonic system, Physical Review Letters 129, 053603 (2022)

2022
[18]

C. Wang, Z. Fang, A. Yi, B. Yang, Z. Wang, L. Zhou, C. Shen, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhou, R. Bao, et al. , High-q mi- croresonators on 4h-silicon-carbide-on-insulator platform for nonlinear photonics, Light: Science & Applications 10, 139 (2021)

2021
[19]

D. R. Assumpcao, C. Jin, M. Sutula, S. W. Ding, P. Pham, C. M. Knaut, M. K. Bhaskar, A. Panday, A. M. Day, D. Renaud, et al. , Deterministic creation of strained color centers in nanostructures via high-stress thin ﬁlms, Applied Physics Letters 123 (2023)

2023
[20]

Koller, T

P. Koller, T. Astner, B. Tissot, G. Burkard, and M. Trupke, Strain-enabled control of the vanadium qudit in silicon carbide, Physical Review Materials 9, L043201 (2025)

2025
[21]

Meesala, Y.-I

S. Meesala, Y.-I. Sohn, B. Pingault, L. Shao, H. A. Atikian, J. Holzgrafe, M. Gundogan, C. Stavrakas, A. Sipahigil, C. Chia, et al. , Strain engineering of the silicon-vacancy center in diamond, Physical Review B 97, 205444 (2018)

2018
[22]

G. K. Celler and S. Cristoloveanu, Frontiers of silicon-on - insulator, Journal of Applied Physics 93, 4955 (2003)

2003
[23]

X. Guo, N. Delegan, J. C. Karsch, Z. Li, T. Liu, R. Shreiner, A. Butcher, D. D. Awschalom, F. J. Here- mans, and A. A. High, Tunable and transferable diamond membranes for integrated quantum technologies, Nano Letters 21, 10392 (2021)

2021
[24]

Kimoto and J

T. Kimoto and J. A. Cooper, Fundamentals of silicon carbide technology: growth, characterization, devices an d applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2014)

2014
[25]

D. M. Lukin, C. Dory, M. A. Guidry, K. Y. Yang, S. D. Mishra, R. Trivedi, M. Radulaski, S. Sun, D. Vercruysse, G. H. Ahn, et al. , 4h-silicon-carbide-on-insulator for in- tegrated quantum and nonlinear photonics, Nature Pho- tonics 14, 330 (2020)

2020
[26]

Majety, V

S. Majety, V. A. Norman, P. Saha, A. H. Rubin, S. Dhuey, and M. Radulaski, Wafer-scale integration of freestanding photonic devices with color centers in silicon carbide, npj Nanophotonics 2, 3 (2025)

2025
[27]

B.-S. Song, S. Jeon, H. Kim, D. D. Kang, T. Asano, and S. Noda, High-q-factor nanobeam photonic crystal cavities in bulk silicon carbide, Applied Physics Letters 113 (2018)

2018
[28]

D. O. Bracher and E. L. Hu, Fabrication of high-q nanobeam photonic crystals in epitaxially grown 4h-sic, Nano letters 15, 6202 (2015)

2015
[29]

D. O. Bracher, X. Zhang, and E. L. Hu, Selective purcell enhancement of two closely linked zero-phonon transi- tions of a silicon carbide color center, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 4060 (2017)

2017
[30]

A. L. Crook, C. P. Anderson, K. C. Miao, A. Bourassa, H. Lee, S. L. Bayliss, D. O. Bracher, X. Zhang, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, et al. , Purcell enhancement of a single sili- con carbide color center with coherent spin control, Nano letters 20, 3427 (2020)

2020
[31]

Tsukimoto, T

S. Tsukimoto, T. Ise, G. Maruyama, S. Hashimoto, T. Sakurada, J. Senzaki, T. Kato, K. Kojima, and H. Okumura, Local strain distribution and microstruc- ture of grinding-induced damage layers in sic wafer, Jour- nal of Electronic Materials 47, 6722 (2018)

2018
[32]

Kozlov, V

V. Kozlov, V. Kozlovskii, A. Titkov, M. Dunaevskii, and A. Kryzhanovskii, Buried nanoscale damaged lay- ers formed in si and sic crystals as a result of high-dose proton implantation, Semiconductors 36, 1227 (2002)

2002
[33]

Dietz, A

J. Dietz, A. Xie, A. M. Day, and E. L. Hu, Selective undercut of undoped optical membranes for spin-active color centers in 4h-silicon carbide, ACS nano (2025)

2025
[34]

J. R. Dietz, Integrating Spin Defects With Thin-Film Sil- icon Carbide Devices , Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University (2025)

2025
[35]

Zhang and J

Z. Zhang and J. T. Yates Jr, Band bending in semicon- ductors: chemical and physical consequences at surfaces and interfaces, Chemical reviews 112, 5520 (2012)

2012
[36]

S. P. Pavunny, R. L. Myers-Ward, K. M. Daniels, W. Shi, K. Sridhara, M. T. DeJarld, A. K. Boyd, F. J. Kub, P. A. Kohl, S. G. Carter, et al. , On the doping concentration dependence and dopant selectivity of photogenerated car- rier assisted etching of 4h–sic epilayers, Electro...

2019
[37]

Giovannetti, S

V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nature photonics 5, 222 (2011)

2011
[39]

A. M. Day, J. R. Dietz, M. Sutula, M. Yeh, and E. L. Hu, Laser writing of spin defects in nanophotonic cavities, Nature Materials 22, 696 (2023)

2023
[40]

Jin, 4H-SiC 1D Photonic Crystal Cavities With Ta- pered Fiber Interface (2025)

C. Jin, 4H-SiC 1D Photonic Crystal Cavities With Ta- pered Fiber Interface (2025)

2025
[41]

Bersin, M

E. Bersin, M. Grein, M. Sutula, R. Murphy, Y. Q. Huan, M. Stevens, A. Suleymanzade, C. Lee, R. Riedinger, D. J. Starling, et al., Development of a boston-area 50-km ﬁber quantum network testbed, Physical Review Applied 21, 014024 (2024)

2024
[42]

Vasselon, A

T. Vasselon, A. Hern´ andez-M ´ ınguez, M. Hollenbach, G. Astakhov, and P. Santos, Acoustically induced spin resonances of silicon-vacancy centers in 4 h-sic, Physical Review Applied 20, 034017 (2023)

2023
[43]

M. J. Schutz and M. J. Schutz, Universal quantum trans- ducers based on surface acoustic waves, Quantum dots for quantum information processing: controlling and ex- ploiting the quantum dot environment , 143 (2017)

2017
[44]

H. Chen, S. Bhave, and G. Fuchs, Acoustically driving the single-quantum spin transition of diamond nitrogen- vacancy centers, Physical Review Applied 13, 054068 (2020)

2020
[45]

Soykal, P

O. Soykal, P. Dev, and S. E. Economou, Silicon vacancy center in 4 h-sic: Electronic structure and spin-photon interfaces, Physical Review B 93, 081207 (2016)

2016
[46]

R. H. Olsson III, K. Hattar, S. J. Homeijer, M. Wiwi, M. Eichenﬁeld, D. W. Branch, M. S. Baker, J. Nguyen, B. Clark, T. Bauer, et al. , A high electromechanical cou- pling coeﬃcient sh0 lamb wave lithium niobate microme- chanical resonator and a method for fabrication, Sensors...

2014
[47]

Z. Xu, S. W. Ding, E. Cornell, S. Mohideen, M. Yeh, K. Kuruma, L. Magalhaes, A. Shams-Ansari, B. Pin- gault, and M. Loncar, Thin ﬁlm lithium niobate on dia- mond (linda) platform for eﬃcient spin-phonon coupling, arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.08895 (2025). 7

2025 arXiv
[48]

M. Li, J. Ling, Y. He, U. A. Javid, S. Xue, and Q. Lin, Lithium niobate photonic-crystal electro-optic modula- tor, Nature communications 11, 4123 (2020)

2020
[50]

Assumpcao, D

D. Assumpcao, D. Renaud, A. Baradari, B. Zeng, C. De-Eknamkul, C. Xin, A. Shams-Ansari, D. Barton, B. Machielse, and M. Loncar, A thin ﬁlm lithium niobate near-infrared platform for multiplexing quantum nodes, Nature communications 15, 1 (2024)

2024
[51]

Krumrein, R

M. Krumrein, R. Nold, F. Davidson-Marquis, A. Bouamra, L. Niechziol, T. Steidl, R. Peng, J. Korber, R. Stohr, N. Gross, et al. , Precise characterization of a waveguide ﬁber interface in silicon carbide, ACS photonics 11, 2160 (2024)

2024
[52]

Campbell, I

J. Campbell, I. Anderson, T.-H. Hsu, O. A. Barrera, J. Kramer, S. Cho, V. Chulukhadze, G. Latham, M.-H. Li, and R. Lu, 21.4 ghz surface acoustic wave resonator with 11,400 m/s phase velocity in thin-ﬁlm lithium niobate on silicon carbide, in 2024 IEEE Ultrasonics, Ferroelectri...

2024
[53]

Hochreiter, F

A. Hochreiter, F. Gross, M.-N. Moller, M. Krieger, and H. B. Weber, Electrochemical etching strategy for shap- ing monolithic 3d structures from 4h-sic wafers, Scientiﬁc reports 13, 19086 (2023)

2023
[54]

S. Das, D. J. Lichtenwalner, H. Dixit, S. Rogers, A. Scholze, and S.-H. Ryu, Study of dopant activation and ionization for phosphorus in 4h-sic, Journal of Elec- tronic Materials 53, 2806 (2024)

2024
[55]

Negoro, T

Y. Negoro, T. Kimoto, H. Matsunami, F. Schmid, and G. Pensl, Electrical activation of high-concentration alu- minum implanted in 4h-sic, Journal of Applied Physics 96, 4916 (2004)

2004
[56]

Wolfowicz, C

G. Wolfowicz, C. P. Anderson, B. Diler, O. G. Poluektov, F. J. Heremans, and D. D. Awschalom, Vanadium spin qubits as telecom quantum emitters in silicon carbide, Science advances 6, eaaz1192 (2020). Supplementary Information for ”A Suspended 4H-Silicon Carbide Membrane Platfo...

2020
[57]

Voigt, G

A. Voigt, G. Ahrens, M. Heinrich, A. Thompson, and G. Gruetzn er, Improved adhesion of novolac and epoxy based resists by cationic organic materials on critical substrates for high vol ume patterning applications, in Advances in Patterning Materials and Processes XXXI , Vol. 9...

2014
[58]

H. W. Park, H. Kim, J. H. Roh, J.-K. Choi, and K.-R. Cha, Simp le and cost-eﬀective method for edge bead removal by using a taping method, Journal of the Korean Physical Society 73, 1473 (2018). 5

2018
[59]

Xie, 4H-SiC 1D Photonic Crystal Cavities (2025)

A. Xie, 4H-SiC 1D Photonic Crystal Cavities (2025)

2025
[60]

Jin, 4H-SiC 1D Photonic Crystal Cavities With Tapered Fi ber Interface (2025)

C. Jin, 4H-SiC 1D Photonic Crystal Cavities With Tapered Fi ber Interface (2025)

2025
[61]

J. R. Dietz, B. Jiang, A. M. Day, S. A. Bhave, and E. L. Hu, Spin -acoustic control of silicon vacancies in 4h silicon carbide, Nature Electronics 6, 739 (2023)

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [49]

K. Xia, F. Sardi, C. Sauerzapf, T. Kornher, H.-W. Becker, Z. Kis, L. Kovacs, D. Dertli, J. Foglszinger, R. Kolesov, et al. , Tunable microcavities coupled to rare- earth quantum emitters, Optica 9, 445 (2022)

work page 2022

[2] [1]

A substrate/electrolyte bias (via a Pt counter elec- trode) to promote hole migration from the n-type substrate to the electrolyte

work page

[3] [2]

Holes were generated by above bandgap UV illumination (500W Newport Hg/Xe lamp)

An epilayer/substrate reverse bias for etch selectiv- ity against the unintentionally-doped epilayer Hydroxide ions were provided by an aqueous solution of KOH (50-100 mM) which was ﬂowed continuously through the PEC cell via a peristaltic pump. Holes were generated by above bandgap UV illumination (500W Newport Hg/Xe lamp). Below bandgap light was ﬁltere...

work page

[4] [3]

Castelletto, Silicon carbide single-photon sources: challenges and prospects, Materials for Quantum Tech- nology 1, 023001 (2021)

S. Castelletto, Silicon carbide single-photon sources: challenges and prospects, Materials for Quantum Tech- nology 1, 023001 (2021)

work page 2021

[5] [4]

Aharonovich, D

I. Aharonovich, D. Englund, and M. Toth, Solid-state single-photon emitters, Nature photonics 10, 631 (2016)

work page 2016

[6] [5]

M. E. Bathen and L. Vines, Manipulating single-photon emission from point defects in diamond and silicon carbide, Advanced Quantum Technologies 4, 2100003 (2021)

work page 2021

[7] [6]

I. A. Khramtsov and D. Y. Fedyanin, Bright silicon car- bide single-photon emitting diodes at low temperatures: Toward quantum photonics applications, Nanomaterials 11, 3177 (2021)

work page 2021

[8] [7]

J. R. Dietz, B. Jiang, A. M. Day, S. A. Bhave, and E. L. Hu, Spin-acoustic control of silicon vacancies in 4h silicon carbide, Nature Electronics 6, 739 (2023)

work page 2023