Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 38 references

Hybrid Fiber-Free-Space Entanglement Distribution Using Off-the-Shelf Quantum Devices

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper reports successful distribution of polarization-entangled photon pairs across a campus-scale three-node network whose two arms are one fiber link and one free-space optical link, built entirely from commercially available…

desk verdict A credible and useful integration milestone for hybrid fiber/free-space quantum networks, but the headline CHSH numbers need raw data and explicit selection rules before I'd trust them fully. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11023 v1 pith:OLEJXMYA submitted 2025-08-14 quant-ph

Gustavo C. Amaral , Nienke M. ten Haaf , Breno Perlingeiro , David L. Bakker , Mark G. M. Boekel , Tim E. van Duivenbode , Karthik Selvan , Nicolas Oidtmann
show 20 more authors
Rafael Ochsendorf Rick N. M. Wasserman Mael Flament Felipe Giraldo Shane Andrewski Mehdi Namazi Federica Facchin Mario Castañeda Fokko de Vries Sayali Shevate Shaurya Bhave Marco Gorter Nico Coesel David Mytling Mike Mabry Carlo Page Alexandra Pinto Joanneke Jansen Rahul Vyas Marc X. Makkes
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords entanglementdistributionhybridquantumnetworkfree-spaceopticallinkpolarization-entangledphotonskeytimetransferCHSHinequalitysingle-photondetectors
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a field demonstration in which polarization-entangled photon pairs were distributed across a three-node network on a university campus, with one arm running over roughly 200 m of fiber and the other over a roughly 150 m free-space atmospheric link. A central node generated the pairs and sent one photon to each edge node; local polarization measurements gave correlation visibilities that violate the classical CHSH bound, with S = 2.63 for the combined fiber/free-space path. The whole system was assembled from off-the-shelf components supplied by commercial partners. A sympathetic reading is that this establishes the practical maturity of hybrid fiber/free-space entanglement distribution and shows a concrete route toward metropolitan quantum networks, entanglement-based quantum key distribution, and quantum time transfer. The authors report an estimated secret-key rate of 33 bits/s over the full A–B path and 770 bits/s over the fiber-only C–B path.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing component is a bichromatic entangled-photon-pair source based on spontaneous four-wave mixing in warm rubidium vapor, which generates the Bell state $|\Phi^+\rangle$ with the signal photon at 795 nm (resonant with rubidium’s D1 line and suited to free space) and the idler at 1324 nm (telecom O-band and suited to fiber). Around this source, the experiment combines three synchronization and multiplexing mechanisms: a White Rabbit clock distributed over fiber for the C–B arm, a free-space pilot tone with active beam steering for the C–A arm, and coarse wavelength-division multiplexing that lets classical Gigabit Ethernet share the same fiber as the quantum idler. The GHz-class linewidth and high brightness of the source let the receivers isolate true coincidence peaks with narrow regions of interest, while superconducting nanowire single-photon detectors provide picosecond timing and very low dark counts.

What would settle it

Recompute the CHSH value for the A–B path using all recorded time tags with no region-of-interest trimming, or with a region of interest and an acceptance rule fixed before unmasking the visibility curve; if the resulting S falls at or below 2, the entanglement claim fails. A reader could also rerun the campaign with the same hardware and a pre-registered analysis pipeline to see whether S = 2.63 reproduces.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that a three-node network built from commercially available hardware can distribute polarization entanglement over a hybrid channel in which one photon of each pair travels through standard optical fiber and the other through open air, with both arms synchronized to a common clock. Using a bichromatic source emitting 795 nm signal and 1324 nm idler photons in the maximally entangled Bell state $|\Phi^+\rangle = (|HH\rangle + |VV\rangle)/\sqrt{2}$, the authors measured polarization correlations at the two edge nodes whose sinusoidal visibility curves exceed the classical bound, yielding S = 2.55 for the fiber-connected node and S = 2.63 for the full path between the two edge nodes. They report an average quantum bit error rate of 2.88%, an estimated secret-key rate of 33 bits/s, and a quantum time-transfer clock-offset residual of 594 ps after 30 s of integration. The authors state that these results confirm successful entanglement distribution in the three-node configuration.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the assumption that the selective regions of interest and the discarding of datasets with synchronization errors were decided without reference to the measured visibilities; if those choices were data-dependent, the reported S values could be inflated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A metropolitan quantum key distribution link can be built from off-the-shelf components today, with a demonstrated secret-key rate of 33 bits/s over the combined fiber/free-space path and 770 bits/s over the fiber-only arm.
  • The same entanglement can serve as a timing resource: with 30 s of data, the quantum time-transfer algorithm pinned the clock offset between two edge nodes to 594 ps, consistent with the detector jitter budget.
  • Because the 795 nm photon is resonant with rubidium’s D1 transition, the network can in principle connect directly to atomic quantum memories and clocks without frequency conversion.
  • Classical synchronization signals and authenticated encrypted control traffic can share the physical channel with photonic qubits, since the source wavelengths sit outside the telecom C-band; the demonstration ran an encrypted link alongside the free-space qubit path and multiplexed classical data with the fiber idler arm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A stronger test of the entanglement claim, not performed in the paper, would fix the region of interest and the dataset-acceptance rules before any visibility scan and then compute S from all retained events; the deployed setup makes this straightforward.
  • The one-way quantum time-transfer analysis suggests that a reciprocal two-way link would cancel common-mode clock drift and push clock-offset residuals below the reported 594 ps, a test the same hardware could support.
  • Because the free-space arm already uses active beam steering and clock recovery from a pilot tone, the deployment pattern is directly transferable to moving platforms such as drones, ships, or ground-to-satellite uplinks, though atmospheric and Doppler effects would need separate characterization.
  • The loss budget implies roughly 13.8 dB of headroom between the free-space arm and the fiber-only arm, so increasing source brightness or receiver aperture could lift the A–B secret-key rate from 33 bits/s toward the 770 bits/s achieved on the fiber-only path.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a field demonstration of polarization-entanglement distribution over a three-node network at the TU Delft campus, using a central node (Charlie) with a bichromatic entangled-photon source and two edge nodes connected by a roughly 150 m free-space link (Alice) and a roughly 200 m fiber link (Bob). The central claim is that CHSH measurements on both links show Bell-inequality violations, with S = 2.55 for the C-B fiber link and S = 2.63 for the hybrid A-B path, corresponding to QBER values of about 2.8% and estimated secret-key rates of 770 bits/s and 33 bits/s. The paper also describes the synchronization architecture, a quantum time-transfer analysis, and the integration of commercial components from the Dutch quantum ecosystem.

Significance. If the reported S-values are statistically robust and the analysis rules are fixed, the experiment is a meaningful systems-integration milestone: it would demonstrate hybrid fiber/free-space entanglement distribution with off-the-shelf equipment, with a concrete loss budget, timing characterization, and application-oriented extrapolations. The strengths are the level of hardware detail, the explicit link-loss accounting, and the demonstration of simultaneous classical and quantum channel operation. However, the central quantitative evidence for entanglement rests on CHSH S = 2.63, and the manuscript currently does not make that evidence independently checkable: the ROI selection and dataset-retention rules are not specified, no uncertainties or raw counts are given, and the conversion from measured visibilities to S is not shown. The significance of the demonstration is therefore conditional on the authors providing a transparent, fixed analysis pipeline.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section III, Figs. 6 and 8] The load-bearing evidence for entanglement is not independently checkable because the analysis rules are not specified. The caption of Fig. 6 states that each point is taken over a 'selective region of interest (ROI)', the caption of Fig. 8 states that each point is over a 'narrow ROI', and the paragraph after Fig. 8 says that 'synchronization errors of timetaggers caused some data sets to be discarded.' The manuscript does not define the ROI boundaries, does not state whether the ROI was fixed before inspecting the coincidence counts, and does not give the number of discarded datasets or the discard criterion. If the ROI or acceptance rule was chosen after looking at the measured visibility, the reported S could be inflated. Please provide a precise, pre-specified analysis rule (e.g., a fixed time window derived from the independently measured FWHM of 995 +/- 87 ps and 1077 +/- 106 ps), report the raw counts for all retained and discarded runs, and show that the same S-values are obtained with a uniform ROI applied to all points.
  2. [Section III, Fig. 8] No uncertainties are reported for the CHSH values, visibilities, or QBER. At the quoted average rate of 15 counts/s per channel combination and 30 s integration, each correlation point contains on the order of 450 counts, so Poisson fluctuations are at the few-percent level; the resulting uncertainty in S is not negligible and must be quantified. Please report confidence intervals for S (e.g., via Poisson Monte Carlo or bootstrap) using the same data-selection rules, and verify that the lower confidence bound exceeds 2. The manuscript should also state whether accidental coincidences were subtracted and, if so, how the accidentals were estimated.
  3. [Section III, Figs. 6 and 8] The calculation of S from the measured data is not shown. The text reports average visibility, QBER, and S-values, and the figure captions refer to sinusoidal fits, but the four correlation functions E(theta, theta') used in the CHSH expression are not given, and the specific measurement settings are not stated. Please present the exact Bell settings, the four E-values for both the C-B and A-B links, and the formula used to combine them. The normalized arbitrary-unit plots alone do not allow a reader to reproduce S = 2.55 or S = 2.63.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section III, paragraph after Fig. 8] The text says the integration window was set to 1.1 ns, 'i.e., events within a +/- 550ns' from zero delay; this should read +/- 550 ps, and the typo should be corrected in any revision.
  2. [Appendix E] The appendix states that wavelength-division multiplexing allows simultaneous quantum and classical communication over a single fiber link connecting Nodes C and A, but the main text and Fig. 1 place the fiber link between C and B and the free-space link between C and A; this contradiction should be resolved.
  3. [Section III and Fig. 3] The text says the free-space synchronization protocol introduces 200 ps jitter, while Fig. 3 reports a measured FWHM of 541 ps; please reconcile the two numbers or clarify which contributions are included in each.
  4. [Section IV.1] The secret-key-rate estimate uses a key-extraction efficiency factor of 0.56 from Ref. [19], which concerns decoy-state BB84; the applicability of this factor to the entanglement-based setup should be justified, or the rate should be presented as an illustrative estimate with stated protocol assumptions.
  5. [Appendix A, pointing stability] The pointing-stability estimate of ~16 urad is given without an uncertainty; a short propagation of the stated voltage and power uncertainties would strengthen the claim.
  6. [Throughout] The phrase 'off-the-shelf' is somewhat overstated because the optical heads are described as custom-designed by TNO; consider rephrasing to 'commercially available components together with custom optical heads.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entanglement claim is a direct CHSH measurement, not a derivation from fitted inputs or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental demonstration: polarization-entangled pairs are distributed over a hybrid fiber/free-space network and characterized by CHSH visibilities (S=2.55 for C-B and S=2.63 for A-B). These S-values are obtained from measured coincidence-count visibility curves in Figs. 6 and 8, benchmarked against the external classical bound S=2; no free parameter is fitted and then renamed as a prediction. The only passages that could look like postselection circularity are the Fig. 6 caption ('Each point represents a 30 s integration and is taken over a selective region of interest (ROI)') and the Section III statement after Fig. 8 ('synchronization errors of timetaggers caused some data sets to be discarded'). These are data-selection limitations, not circular reductions, because the integration windows were set from measured correlation-peak FWHM values (995±87 ps and 1077±106 ps), and no rule is stated that conditions the ROI or retention decision on the measured visibility or S. The QTT clock-offset plot in Fig. 9 is fit to an inverse-square-root curve whose asymptote is extracted from the same dataset; this is a self-consistency diagnostic for a secondary time-transfer application, not a load-bearing derivation of the entanglement result. Several cited works involve overlapping authors (e.g., Refs. [7], [8], [17], and [21]), but none carries the central entanglement claim by citation: the source specifications from Ref. [21] are independently measurable characteristics, and the CHSH measurement itself is presented as direct experimental evidence. Therefore no circular step that reduces the derivation to its inputs can be exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard quantum measurement assumptions plus a few domain-specific characterizations. The most fragile elements are the source characterization inherited from a self-cited paper and the unstated ROI selection rule. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Coincidence integration window = 1 ns C-B, 1.1 ns A-B
    Window width set to 1.0-1.1 ns around the correlation peak to maximize signal-to-noise ratio; different widths would change coincidence counts and the reported S-values.
  • QTT clock-offset fit asymptote = 594 ps
    Fig. 9 fits an inverse-square-root curve to the measured clock-offset estimates; the asymptotic residual (594 ps) is read off the fit rather than predicted from an independent model. This is peripheral to the entanglement claim.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math CHSH inequality and Bell's theorem are valid criteria for detecting entanglement in polarization measurements.
    Used to interpret S values in Figs. 6 and 8.
  • domain assumption The Qunnect QuSRC source produces the intended polarization-entangled Bell state |Φ+> with stated brightness, g(2)>=30, and ~30% heralding efficiency.
    The source is characterized in reference [21], which shares authors with this paper (Flament, Namazi); no full re-characterization is reported here. The entanglement claim inherits this characterization.
  • domain assumption The detectors (Si-APDs and SNSPDs) register single photons without significant crosstalk, and the free-space/fiber channels preserve polarization correlations after the QSA waveplate corrections.
    The paper does not present detector tomography or channel polarization characterization; the visibility measurements assume the waveplates are calibrated to the source basis.
  • domain assumption The 795 nm 2 nm spectral filter and the night-time environment reduce stray light to near dark-count level, so accidental coincidences do not dominate the measured correlation peaks.
    The daytime results are explicitly noise-limited; the night results rely on stray light dropping to ~4 kcps close to the 1 kcps dark-count rate (Section III).
  • ad hoc to paper The 'selective ROI' and data-retention criteria used to produce each visibility point are unbiased with respect to the measured visibility.
    Figs. 6 and 8 state that points are taken over a 'selective region of interest'; the paper does not define the selection rule. This is an ad hoc choice that could bias the reported S-values.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Hybrid Fiber-Free-Space Entanglement Distribution Using Off-the-Shelf Quantum Devices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OLEJXMYA

@misc{pith2026250811023,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Hybrid Fiber-Free-Space Entanglement Distribution Using Off-the-Shelf Quantum Devices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OLEJXMYA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11023}
}
read the original abstract

Entanglement serves as a fundamental resource for quantum technologies, enabling communication and computation tasks that surpass classical limits. Its distribution across networks is essential for interconnecting quantum processors, enabling distributed quantum computing to address complex challenges in areas such as drug discovery, material science, and optimization. In this work, we report the successful distribution of polarization-entangled photon pairs across a campus-scale, three-node quantum network comprising both fiber and free-space optical links. The entire system was built using commercially available components provided by partners within the Netherlands Quantum Ecosystem. This result represents advancements in the technological maturity of quantum communication systems and demonstrates a pathway towards the practical deployment of early-stage quantum networks both on Earth and in space.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.11023 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Map of the Delft University of Technology campus showing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Block diagram of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Relative clock jitter between Nodes C and A. This [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Photon correlation measurements recorded in day [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. CHSH entanglement visibility between Nodes C- B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. First correlation measurements recorded at night [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. CHSH visibility between Nodes A- B, with each point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Experimental configuration for synchronizing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Clock offset estimation using QTT algorithm and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Transmitter QuadCell data recorded over a one hour [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Receiver breadboard. The setup contains three op [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Signal–idler correlation peak between Nodes C [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This step is straightforward for the fiber path

    Optical path establishment. This step is straightforward for the fiber path. For free-space, a coarse alignment is performed using a periscopic mirror at the transmitter

    work page

  2. [2]

    In fiber, the GbE signal is directly demultiplexed

    Classical link establishment. In fiber, the GbE signal is directly demultiplexed. In free-space, fine- pointing feedback is activated to maintain align- ment. Synchronization is validated by comparing clock edges

    work page

  3. [3]

    The source at Node C is verified through correlations with Nodes A and B

    Coincidence peak detection. The source at Node C is verified through correlations with Nodes A and B

    work page

  4. [4]

    With delays es- tablished, visibility is evaluated by rotating the half-wave plates and extracting correlation data from coincidence counts

    Entanglement visibility scans. With delays es- tablished, visibility is evaluated by rotating the half-wave plates and extracting correlation data from coincidence counts. 5 III. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS AND ANALYSIS The installation of the optical heads at Nodes C and A began with assembling tripods and coarse pointing align- ment systems. A periscopic mirro...

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Encryption and Physically Unclonable Functions With a secret key generation rate of 33 bits/s and the maximum recommended transfer size for AES-256-GCM of 2 39− 256 bits [20] within the cPUF, the correspond- ing maximum achievable data throughput over the data channel is ∼60 Gbit/s. In other words, the necessary measurement time until a new 256-bit-long s...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Quantum Time Transfer In environments where Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) signals are unavailable or untrustworthy due to jamming, spoofing, or mission-specific constraints, secure and precise timing remains essential. Quantum Time Transfer (QTT) provides a means of achieving syn- chronization without relying on existing RF-based satel- lite i...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and be- yond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum computing in the nisq era and be- yond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

Show all 38 references
  1. [9]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science 362, eaam9288 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Merolla, B

    J.-M. Merolla, B. Pages, J. Cussey, R. Martinenghi, V. Parra, E. Fretel, J. Prieur, and J. Piris, High- performance 1560 nm entangled photon source for high secure key rates qkd satellite-based communications, in International Conference on Space Optics—ICSO 2022 , Vol. 12777 ...

    2022

  3. [11]

    M. F. Askarani, A. Das, J. H. Davidson, G. C. Ama- ral, N. Sinclair, J. A. Slater, S. Marzban, C. W. Thiel, R. L. Cone, D. Oblak, et al. , Long-lived solid-state op- tical memory for high-rate quantum repeaters, Physical Review Letters 127, 220502 (2021)

    2021

  4. [12]

    Duranti, S

    S. Duranti, S. Wengerowsky, L. Feldmann, A. Seri, B. Casabone, and H. De Riedmatten, Efficient cavity- assisted storage of photonic qubits in a solid-state quan- tum memory, Optics Express 32, 26884 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Y. Wang, A. N. Craddock, R. Sekelsky, M. Flament, and M. Namazi, Field-deployable quantum memory for quan- tum networking, Physical Review Applied 18, 044058 (2022)

    2022

  6. [14]

    A. N. Craddock, Y. Wang, F. Giraldo, R. Sekelsky, M. Flament, and M. Namazi, High-rate subgigahertz- linewidth bichromatic entanglement source for quantum networking, Physical Review Applied 21, 034012 (2024)

    2024

  7. [15]

    Lago-Rivera, J

    D. Lago-Rivera, J. V. Rakonjac, S. Grandi, and H. d. Riedmatten, Long distance multiplexed quantum tele- portation from a telecom photon to a solid-state qubit, Nature Communications 14, 1889 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Krˇ ziˇ c, S

    A. Krˇ ziˇ c, S. Sharma, C. Spiess, U. Chandrashekara, S. T¨ opfer, G. Sauer, L. J. Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ın del Campo, T. Kopf, S. Petscharnig, T. Grafenauer, et al. , Towards metropolitan free-space quantum networks, npj Quan- tum Information 9, 95 (2023)

    2023

  9. [17]

    D. L. Bakker, Y. Jong, B. P. F. Dirks, and G. C. Amaral, A best-path approach to the design of a hybrid space– ground quantum network with dynamic constraints, in Photonics, Vol. 11 (MDPI, 2024) p. 268. 10

    2024

  10. [18]

    Sheridan, N

    E. Sheridan, N. J. Barton, R. Birrittella, V. Nehra, Z. Smith, C. Tison, A. M. Smith, S. Dharanibalan, V. Bedi, D. Hucul, B. Kyle, C. Nadeau, M. Draper, J. Heinig, S. Faulkner, R. Scales, A. M. Brownell, S. Pre- ble, J. Schneeloch, S. Schwab, D. Campbell, D. Sica, P. Ricci, V....

    2025

  11. [19]

    Vallone, D

    G. Vallone, D. Bacco, D. Dequal, S. Gaiarin, V. Luceri, G. Bianco, and P. Villoresi, Experimental satellite quan- tum communications, Physical Review Letters 115, 040502 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    J. Yin, Y. Cao, Y.-H. Li, S.-K. Liao, L. Zhang, J.-G. Ren, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, B. Li, H. Dai, et al. , Satellite- based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers, Science 356, 1140 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    C. H. Bennett, G. Brassard, and N. D. Mermin, Quan- tum cryptography without bell’s theorem, Physical Re- view Letters 68, 557 (1992)

    1992

  14. [23]

    ˇSkori´ c and M

    B. ˇSkori´ c and M. X. Makkes, Flowchart description of se- curity primitives for controlled physical unclonable func- tions, International Journal of Information Security 9, 327 (2010)

    2010

  15. [24]

    Due to the limited availability of the Beta module during the free-space trials, Qblox hardware tests were restricted to the Bob and Charlie nodes

  16. [25]

    Attema, J

    T. Attema, J. W. Bosman, and N. M. Neumann, Op- timizing the decoy-state bb84 qkd protocol parameters, Quantum Information Processing 20, 154 (2021)

    2021

  17. [26]

    NIST, Sp 800-38d: Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: Galois, Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2007)

    S. NIST, Sp 800-38d: Recommendation for block cipher modes of operation: Galois, Counter Mode (GCM) and GMAC, National Institute of Standards and Technology (2007)

    2007

  18. [27]

    A. N. Craddock, Y. Wang, F. Giraldo, R. Sekelsky, M. Flament, and M. Namazi, High-rate sub-ghz linewidth bichromatic entanglement source for quantum network- ing, arXiv preprint (2023), submitted 11 April 2023, arXiv:2304.05504 [quant-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  19. [28]

    G. N. Gol’tsman, O. Okunev, G. Chulkova, A. Lipatov, A. Semenov, K. Smirnov, B. Voronov, and A. Dzardanov, Picosecond superconducting single-photon optical detec- tor, Applied Physics Letters 79, 705 (2001)

    2001

  20. [29]

    Chang, J

    J. Chang, J. W. N. Los, J. O. Tenorio-Pearl, N. Noordzij, R. Gourgues, A. Guardiani, J. R. Zichi, S. F. Pereira, H. P. Urbach, V. Zwiller, S. N. Dorenbos, and I. E. Zadeh, Detecting telecom single photons with (99.5 +0.5 −2.07)% sys- tem detection efficiency and high time reso...

    2021 doi

  21. [30]

    I. E. Zadeh, J. W. N. Los, R. B. M. Gourgues, J. Chang, A. W. Elshaari, J. R. Zichi, Y. J. van Staaden, J. P. E. Swens, N. Kalhor, A. Guardiani, Y. Meng, K. Zou, S. Do- brovolskiy, A. W. Fognini, D. R. Schaart, D. Dalacu, P. J. Poole, M. E. Reimer, X. Hu, S. F. Pereira, V. Zwi...

    2020

  22. [31]

    D. J. Bernstein, T. Lange, and R. Rezaeian Farashahi, Binary edwards curves, in Cryptographic Hardware and Embedded Systems – CHES 2008: 10th International Workshop, Washington, DC, USA, August 10–13, 2008. Proceedings 10 (Springer, 2008) pp. 244–265

    2008

  23. [32]

    R. L. Rivest, A. Shamir, and L. Adleman, A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosys- tems, Communications of the ACM 21, 120 (1978)

    1978

  24. [33]

    P. W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factor- ization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM Review 41, 303 (1999)

    1999

  25. [34]

    Y. Gao, S. F. Al-Sarawi, and D. Abbott, Physical un- clonable functions, Nature Electronics 3, 81 (2020)

    2020

  26. [35]

    J. Lee, L. Shen, A. Cer` e, J. Troupe, A. Lamas-Linares, and C. Kurtsiefer, Symmetrical clock synchronization with time-correlated photon pairs, Applied Physics Let- ters 114 (2019)

    2019

  27. [36]

    Haldar, I

    S. Haldar, I. Agullo, A. J. Brady, A. Lamas-Linares, W. C. Proctor, and J. E. Troupe, Towards global time distribution via satellite-based sources of entangled pho- tons, Physical Review A 107, 022615 (2023)

    2023

  28. [37]

    Haldar, I

    S. Haldar, I. Agullo, and J. E. Troupe, Synchronizing clocks via satellites using entangled photons: Effect of relative velocity on precision, Physical Review A 108, 062613 (2023)

    2023

  29. [38]

    Haldar, S

    S. Haldar, S. Ducoing, I. Agullo, and J. Troupe, A quantum-assisted master clock in the sky: global syn- chronization from satellites at sub-nanosecond precision, Research Square (2024)

    2024

  30. [39]

    Lamas-Linares and J

    A. Lamas-Linares and J. Troupe, Secure quantum clock synchronization, in Advances in Photonics of Quantum Computing, Memory, and Communication XI, Vol. 10547 (SPIE, 2018) pp. 59–66. 11 VII. APPENDIX A. Spectrally Multiplexed Optical Free-Space Optical Heads Node C features a T...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.