Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 49 references

SPG: Style-Prompting Guidance for Style-Specific Content Creation

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes Style-Prompting Guidance (SPG): constructing a style noise vector and using its deviation from unconditional noise to guide a pretrained text-to-image diffusion model toward a target style, preserving semantic fidelity by

desk verdict The SPG paper is not actually in this manuscript—the body is an unrelated navigation paper—so there is nothing to review for the claimed method. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11476 v1 pith:RTTB2X2V submitted 2025-08-15 cs.GR cs.CV

Qian Liang , Zichong Chen , Yang Zhou , Hui Huang This is my paper
classification cs.GRcs.CV
keywords style-promptingguidancetext-to-imagediffusionclassifier-freestylecontrolnoisevectorsamplingstrategyconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes Style-Prompting Guidance (SPG), a sampling strategy for text-to-image diffusion that aims to control visual style without retraining the model. The intended payoff is that a user can specify a style and keep the prompt's semantic content, because SPG's style guidance is combined with classifier-free guidance. The supplied manuscript, however, contains only the SPG abstract; its full text is an unrelated open-vocabulary navigation paper, so the derivation, method details, and experiments promised in the abstract are not present in the provided material. If the mechanism works as described, style control becomes a lightweight add-on to existing diffusion sampling rather than a new trained model.

What carries the argument

The central object is a style noise vector: a point constructed to represent the desired visual style in the noise space of the diffusion model. SPG measures the direction from the unconditional noise to this style vector and treats that direction as the steering signal that moves generation toward the target style. Combining this directional signal with classifier-free guidance is what lets the text prompt continue to control the image's semantic content while the style vector controls its look.

What would settle it

Run the released code on a fixed text prompt, such as "a photo of a cat," with and without SPG across several named styles, then measure whether independent raters or a style classifier can reliably distinguish the SPG images by style while the cat's identity and pose remain constant. If SPG images are not reliably style-distinct from CFG-only images, or if semantic fidelity drops, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, as stated in the abstract, the central discovery is that a constructed style noise vector can steer a pretrained text-to-image diffusion model toward a target style distribution. SPG takes the directional deviation of this style noise vector from the unconditional noise and uses it as a guidance signal during sampling; integrating this with Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG) yields both semantic fidelity and style consistency. The abstract claims that this approach is simple, robust, compatible with frameworks such as ControlNet and IPAdapter, and supported by extensive experiments showing effectiveness and generality.

Load-bearing premise

The whole method rests on the premise that the direction from the unconditional noise distribution to a single constructed style noise vector is a reliable and sufficient steering signal for style, and that this signal can be added to classifier-free guidance without pulling the image away from the prompt's content.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If SPG works as claimed, text-to-image diffusion models can produce style-specific images without retraining or fine-tuning.
  • Combining SPG with classifier-free guidance should keep the image aligned with the text prompt while matching the target style.
  • SPG is claimed to be compatible with ControlNet and IPAdapter, so it could add style control to existing controllable generation pipelines.
  • Since SPG is a sampling strategy, it could be inserted into deployed diffusion systems as a plug-in rather than as a replacement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implication the authors leave implicit: if a single style vector can steer an entire style, then interpolating between two style vectors could yield style mixing or smooth style transfer, a natural extension not stated in the abstract.
  • A testable extension for neighboring problems: the same directional-deviation idea could be applied to other conditional axes, such as lighting, time of day, or rendering motifs, by constructing corresponding anchor noise vectors.
  • The abstract does not specify how the style noise vector is constructed; whether the method succeeds likely hinges on that recipe, so the claim's practical validity depends on details not present in the supplied text.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript under review, arXiv:2508.11476, presents an abstract claiming a new sampling strategy called Style-Prompting Guidance (SPG) for style-specific text-to-image generation. The abstract states that SPG constructs a style noise vector, uses its directional deviation from unconditional noise to guide diffusion, integrates with Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG), and is compatible with ControlNet and IPAdapter, with extensive experiments demonstrating effectiveness. However, the full text supplied is an entirely different paper: it is titled 'OVSegDT: Segmenting Transformer for Open-Vocabulary Object Goal Navigation' (arXiv:2508.11479), with different authors, abstract, contributions, sections, appendix, and references. No SPG method, derivation, algorithm, equation, experiment, or ablation appears anywhere in the supplied full text. The only evidence for the SPG claims is the abstract itself, which is insufficient for technical evaluation.

Significance. If the SPG method described in the abstract were present and correct, it could offer a practically valuable training-free style-control mechanism for text-to-image diffusion, especially its claimed compatibility with existing controllable frameworks. However, the submitted manuscript provides no technical content to support this. There are no equations defining the style noise vector or its directional deviation, no sampling algorithm, no theoretical justification for semantic preservation under CFG, and no experimental comparisons. The paper ships no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivations related to SPG. Consequently, the significance of the claimed contribution cannot be assessed from the submitted text, and the central claim is unsupported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (title through references)] The body of the manuscript is not the paper described in the abstract. After the first page, the document is the OVSegDT paper on open-vocabulary object goal navigation, including its own title, authors, abstract, related work, acknowledgments, appendix, and reference list. There is no section, equation, algorithm, or experimental result concerning SPG, style noise, directional deviation, classifier-free guidance, or diffusion models. This is not a minor editorial issue: the central claim of the abstract is entirely unsubstantiated by the supplied full text.
  2. [Abstract (only SPG description)] The only technical description of SPG is the abstract's two sentences. No formal definition is given for the 'style noise vector' or for its 'directional deviation from unconditional noise.' No sampling procedure is specified, and no derivation shows how combining this signal with CFG preserves semantic fidelity while achieving style consistency. These are load-bearing components of the proposed method; without them, the mechanism cannot be evaluated for correctness, novelty, or robustness.
  3. [Experiments (claimed in abstract, absent in body)] The abstract claims 'Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of our approach compared to state-of-the-art methods.' The supplied manuscript contains no experiments related to text-to-image generation. All presented results—tables, figures, and appendix analyses—concern navigation metrics (SR, SPL, collision counts) on HM3D-OVON and YOLOE confidence thresholds. No evidence supports the abstract's empirical claims about SPG, its generality, or its compatibility with ControlNet and IPAdapter.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Code link] The abstract gives a GitHub URL for SPG code, but the code is not referenced or described anywhere in the full text. No repository contents, usage instructions, or reproducibility details are provided, so the link cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Header / arXiv metadata] The full text footer cites arXiv:2508.11479, which differs from the target manuscript number 2508.11476. This is consistent with the wrong manuscript being submitted; the metadata must be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity can be established: the supplied full text contains no SPG method, equations, or experiments to analyze.

full rationale

The submitted document is internally inconsistent: the abstract describes SPG, a style-prompting guidance method for text-to-image diffusion, but the full text is an unrelated paper titled 'OVSegDT: Segmenting Transformer for Open-Vocabulary Object Goal Navigation' with different authors, different abstract, and different references. Consequently, there is no derivation chain for SPG to walk. The central SPG claim—that a style noise vector's directional deviation from unconditional noise guides diffusion toward a target style—appears only in the abstract and is never defined, derived, or tested anywhere in the provided text. Circularity, as defined in the task, requires exhibiting a specific reduction: a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, a result equivalent to its input by construction, or a load-bearing argument that reduces to a self-citation chain. No such reduction can be exhibited because the relevant equations and method sections are absent. The absence of the method is a severe completeness and integrity problem—the claimed contribution is unsupported as submitted—but it is not itself a circularity. The OVSegDT content is a separate, self-contained technical paper about embodied navigation; it does not bear on the SPG claims and contains no obvious circular reasoning among its own components. Therefore, the honest circularity finding is 0, with the caveat that this score reflects unverifiability rather than demonstrated independence of the SPG claims.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 1 invented entities

No method text is available, so the ledger is almost empty. The only identifiable axiom is the implicit assumption that a noise-vector deviation is a valid style control signal. Free parameters and other axioms cannot be audited because the actual SPG derivation is not in the manuscript.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The directional deviation of a noise vector from unconditional noise is a valid control signal for style in diffusion sampling.
    Stated only in the abstract without derivation or supporting text in the manuscript body.
invented entities (1)
  • Style noise vector
    purpose: To guide the diffusion process toward a target style distribution by directional deviation from unconditional noise.
    Introduced in the abstract; no definition, construction, or falsifiable prediction is provided in the supplied text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SPG: Style-Prompting Guidance for Style-Specific Content Creation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RTTB2X2V

@misc{pith2026250811476,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SPG: Style-Prompting Guidance for Style-Specific Content Creation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RTTB2X2V}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11476}
}
read the original abstract

Although recent text-to-image (T2I) diffusion models excel at aligning generated images with textual prompts, controlling the visual style of the output remains a challenging task. In this work, we propose Style-Prompting Guidance (SPG), a novel sampling strategy for style-specific image generation. SPG constructs a style noise vector and leverages its directional deviation from unconditional noise to guide the diffusion process toward the target style distribution. By integrating SPG with Classifier-Free Guidance (CFG), our method achieves both semantic fidelity and style consistency. SPG is simple, robust, and compatible with controllable frameworks like ControlNet and IPAdapter, making it practical and widely applicable. Extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of our approach compared to state-of-the-art methods. Code is available at https://github.com/Rumbling281441/SPG.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Vision-and-language navigation: In- terpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments

    Peter Anderson, Qi Wu, Damien Teney, Jake Bruce, Mark Johnson, Niko S ¨underhauf, Ian Reid, Stephen Gould, and Anton Van Den Hengel. Vision-and-language navigation: In- terpreting visually-grounded navigation instructions in real environments. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 3674–3683,

  2. [2]

    Bridging zero- shot object navigation and foundation models through pixel- guided navigation skill

    Wenzhe Cai, Siyuan Huang, Guangran Cheng, Yuxing Long, Peng Gao, Changyin Sun, and Hao Dong. Bridging zero- shot object navigation and foundation models through pixel- guided navigation skill. In2024 IEEE International Confer- ence on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 5228–5234. IEEE, 2024. 2, 3

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Goat: Go to any thing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06430, 2023

    Matthew Chang, Theophile Gervet, Mukul Khanna, Sriram Yenamandra, Dhruv Shah, So Yeon Min, Kavit Shah, Chris Paxton, Saurabh Gupta, Dhruv Batra, et al. Goat: Go to any thing.arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.06430, 2023. 2

    arXiv 2023

  4. [4]

    Mapgpt: Map-guided prompt- ing with adaptive path planning for vision-and-language nav- igation

    Jiaqi Chen, Bingqian Lin, Ran Xu, Zhenhua Chai, Xiaodan Liang, and Kwan-Yee Wong. Mapgpt: Map-guided prompt- ing with adaptive path planning for vision-and-language nav- igation. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 9796–9810, 2024. 3

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Navila: Legged robot vision-language-action model for navigation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04453, 2024

    An-Chieh Cheng, Yandong Ji, Zhaojing Yang, Zaitian Gongye, Xueyan Zou, Jan Kautz, Erdem Bıyık, Hongxu Yin, Sifei Liu, and Xiaolong Wang. Navila: Legged robot vision-language-action model for navigation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.04453, 2024. 3

    arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation

    Bowen Cheng, Ishan Misra, Alexander G Schwing, Alexan- der Kirillov, and Rohit Girdhar. Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1290–1299, 2022. 5

    2022

  7. [7]

    Procthor: Large-scale embodied ai using procedural generation.Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:5982– 5994, 2022

    Matt Deitke, Eli VanderBilt, Alvaro Herrasti, Luca Weihs, Kiana Ehsani, Jordi Salvador, Winson Han, Eric Kolve, Aniruddha Kembhavi, and Roozbeh Mottaghi. Procthor: Large-scale embodied ai using procedural generation.Ad- vances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:5982– 5994, 2022. 3

    2022

  8. [8]

    Imitating shortest paths in simulation enables effective navigation and manipulation in the real world.CoRR, 2023

    Kiana Ehsani, Tanmay Gupta, Rose Hendrix, Jordi Salvador, Luca Weihs, Kuo-Hao Zeng, Kunal Pratap Singh, Yejin Kim, Winson Han, Alvaro Herrasti, et al. Imitating shortest paths in simulation enables effective navigation and manipulation in the real world.CoRR, 2023. 4

    work page 2023

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor

    Tuomas Haarnoja, Aurick Zhou, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. InInterna- tional conference on machine learning, pages 1861–1870. Pmlr, 2018. 18

    2018

  2. [10]

    A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths

    Peter E Hart, Nils J Nilsson, and Bertram Raphael. A formal basis for the heuristic determination of minimum cost paths. IEEE transactions on Systems Science and Cybernetics, 4 (2):100–107, 1968. 4

    1968

  3. [11]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. InProceed- ings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016. 4

    2016

  4. [12]

    Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05474,

    Eric Kolve, Roozbeh Mottaghi, Winson Han, Eli VanderBilt, Luca Weihs, Alvaro Herrasti, Matt Deitke, Kiana Ehsani, Daniel Gordon, Yuke Zhu, et al. Ai2-thor: An interactive 3d environment for visual ai.arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05474,

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    Vision-based navigation using deep reinforcement learning

    Jon ´aˇs Kulh ´anek, Erik Derner, Tim De Bruin, and Robert Babuˇska. Vision-based navigation using deep reinforcement learning. In2019 european conference on mobile robots (ECMR), pages 1–8. IEEE, 2019. 3

    2019

  6. [14]

    Unified-io 2: Scaling autoregressive multimodal models with vision language audio and action

    Jiasen Lu, Christopher Clark, Sangho Lee, Zichen Zhang, Savya Khosla, Ryan Marten, Derek Hoiem, and Aniruddha Kembhavi. Unified-io 2: Scaling autoregressive multimodal models with vision language audio and action. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision a...

    2024

  7. [15]

    Thda: Treasure hunt data augmentation for semantic navigation

    Oleksandr Maksymets, Vincent Cartillier, Aaron Gokaslan, Erik Wijmans, Wojciech Galuba, Stefan Lee, and Dhruv Ba- tra. Thda: Treasure hunt data augmentation for semantic navigation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 15374–15383, 2...

    2021

  8. [16]

    Un- supervised representation learning with deep convolu- tional generative adversarial networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015

    Alec Radford, Luke Metz, and Soumith Chintala. Un- supervised representation learning with deep convolu- tional generative adversarial networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06434, 2015. 5

    2015 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Pirlnav: Pretraining with imitation and rl finetuning for objectnav

    Ram Ramrakhya, Dhruv Batra, Erik Wijmans, and Abhishek Das. Pirlnav: Pretraining with imitation and rl finetuning for objectnav. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 17896– 17906, 2023. 1

    2023

  10. [18]

    Autonomous image-based exploration for mobile robot navigation

    D Santosh, Supreeth Achar, and CV Jawahar. Autonomous image-based exploration for mobile robot navigation. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Au- tomation, pages 2717–2722. IEEE, 2008. 4

    2008

  11. [19]

    Autonomous curriculum design via relative entropy based task modifications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21166,

    Muhammed Yusuf Satici, Jianxun Wang, and David L Roberts. Autonomous curriculum design via relative entropy based task modifications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21166,

    arXiv

  12. [20]

    High-dimensional continuous con- trol using generalized advantage estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438, 2015

    John Schulman, Philipp Moritz, Sergey Levine, Michael Jor- dan, and Pieter Abbeel. High-dimensional continuous con- trol using generalized advantage estimation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.02438, 2015. 4

    2015 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Proximal policy optimization algo- rithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017

    John Schulman, Filip Wolski, Prafulla Dhariwal, Alec Rad- ford, and Oleg Klimov. Proximal policy optimization algo- rithms.arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.06347, 2017. 4

    2017 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Fast marching methods.SIAM review, 41 (2):199–235, 1999

    James A Sethian. Fast marching methods.SIAM review, 41 (2):199–235, 1999. 2

    1999

  15. [23]

    Realm: Robust en- tropy adaptive loss minimization for improved single-sample test-time adaptation

    Skyler Seto, Barry-John Theobald, Federico Danieli, Navdeep Jaitly, and Dan Busbridge. Realm: Robust en- tropy adaptive loss minimization for improved single-sample test-time adaptation. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Win- ter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision, page...

  16. [24]

    Real-time object navigation with deep neural networks and hierarchical reinforcement learning.IEEE Access, 8: 195608–195621, 2020

    Aleksey Staroverov, Dmitry A Yudin, Ilya Belkin, Vasily Adeshkin, Yaroslav K Solomentsev, and Aleksandr I Panov. Real-time object navigation with deep neural networks and hierarchical reinforcement learning.IEEE Access, 8: 195608–195621, 2020. 1, 2

    2020

  17. [25]

    Semantic object navigation with segment- ing decision transformer.IEEE Access, 2025

    Aleksei Staroverov, Tatiana Zemskova, Dmitry Yudin, and Aleksandr Panov. Semantic object navigation with segment- ing decision transformer.IEEE Access, 2025. 5

    2025

  18. [26]

    Ea-kd: Entropy-based adaptive knowledge distillation

    Chi-Ping Su, Ching-Hsun Tseng, Bin Pu, Lei Zhao, Jiewen Yang, Zhuangzhuang Chen, and Shin-Jye Lee. Ea-kd: Entropy-based adaptive knowledge distillation. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Com- puter Vision, pages 731–740, 2025. 18

    2025

  19. [27]

    Prioritized semantic learning for zero-shot in- stance navigation

    Xinyu Sun, Lizhao Liu, Hongyan Zhi, Ronghe Qiu, and Jun- wei Liang. Prioritized semantic learning for zero-shot in- stance navigation. InEuropean Conference on Computer Vi- sion, pages 161–178. Springer, 2024. 3

    2024

  20. [28]

    Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszko- reit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need.Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 2017. 5

    2017

  21. [29]

    Yoloe: Real-time seeing anything.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07465, 2025

    Ao Wang, Lihao Liu, Hui Chen, Zijia Lin, Jungong Han, and Guiguang Ding. Yoloe: Real-time seeing anything.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.07465, 2025. 6, 8

    2025

  22. [30]

    Aux-think: Exploring reason- ing strategies for data-efficient vision-language navigation

    Shuo Wang, Yongcai Wang, Wanting Li, Xudong Cai, Yucheng Wang, Maiyue Chen, Kaihui Wang, Zhizhong Su, Deying Li, and Zhaoxin Fan. Aux-think: Exploring reason- ing strategies for data-efficient vision-language navigation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11886, 2025. 3

    2025

  23. [31]

    Dd- ppo: Learning near-perfect pointgoal navigators from 2.5 bil- lion frames

    Erik Wijmans, Abhishek Kadian, Ari Morcos, Stefan Lee, Ir- fan Essa, Devi Parikh, Manolis Savva, and Dhruv Batra. Dd- ppo: Learning near-perfect pointgoal navigators from 2.5 bil- lion frames. InInternational Conference on Learning Rep- resentations, 2020. 2

    2020

  24. [32]

    Ver: Scaling on- policy rl leads to the emergence of navigation in embodied rearrangement.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:7727–7740, 2022

    Erik Wijmans, Irfan Essa, and Dhruv Batra. Ver: Scaling on- policy rl leads to the emergence of navigation in embodied rearrangement.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:7727–7740, 2022. 6

    2022

  25. [33]

    Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation

    Hongtao Wu, Ya Jing, Chilam Cheang, Guangzeng Chen, Jiafeng Xu, Xinghang Li, Minghuan Liu, Hang Li, and Tao Kong. Unleashing large-scale video generative pre-training for visual robot manipulation. InICLR, 2024. 3

    2024

  26. [34]

    Habitat-matterport 3d semantics dataset

    Karmesh Yadav, Ram Ramrakhya, Santhosh Kumar Ramakr- ishnan, Theo Gervet, John Turner, Aaron Gokaslan, Noah Maestre, Angel Xuan Chang, Dhruv Batra, Manolis Savva, et al. Habitat-matterport 3d semantics dataset. InProceed- ings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and ...

    2023

  27. [35]

    Entaugment: Entropy-driven adaptive data augmentation framework for image classification

    Suorong Yang, Furao Shen, and Jian Zhao. Entaugment: Entropy-driven adaptive data augmentation framework for image classification. InEuropean conference on computer vision, pages 197–214. Springer, 2024. 17

    2024

  28. [36]

    Sg-nav: Online 3d scene graph prompting for llm-based zero-shot object navigation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:5285–5307, 2024

    Hang Yin, Xiuwei Xu, Zhenyu Wu, Jie Zhou, and Jiwen Lu. Sg-nav: Online 3d scene graph prompting for llm-based zero-shot object navigation.Advances in neural information processing systems, 37:5285–5307, 2024. 2, 3

    2024

  29. [37]

    Vlfm: Vision-language frontier maps for zero-shot semantic navigation

    Naoki Yokoyama, Sehoon Ha, Dhruv Batra, Jiuguang Wang, and Bernadette Bucher. Vlfm: Vision-language frontier maps for zero-shot semantic navigation. In2024 IEEE In- ternational Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pages 42–48. IEEE, 2024. 2, 3, 7

    2024

  30. [38]

    Hm3d-ovon: A dataset and bench- mark for open-vocabulary object goal navigation

    Naoki Yokoyama, Ram Ramrakhya, Abhishek Das, Dhruv Batra, and Sehoon Ha. Hm3d-ovon: A dataset and bench- mark for open-vocabulary object goal navigation. In2024 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), pages 5543–5550. IEEE, 2024. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7

    2024

  31. [39]

    Multi-task curriculum graph contrastive learning with clustering entropy guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12071, 2024

    Chusheng Zeng, Bocheng Wang, Jinghui Yuan, Rong Wang, and Mulin Chen. Multi-task curriculum graph contrastive learning with clustering entropy guidance.arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.12071, 2024. 18

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Poliformer: Scaling on-policy rl with transformers results in masterful navigators

    Kuo-Hao Zeng, Zichen Zhang, Kiana Ehsani, Rose Hendrix, Jordi Salvador, Alvaro Herrasti, Ross Girshick, Aniruddha Kembhavi, and Luca Weihs. Poliformer: Scaling on-policy rl with transformers results in masterful navigators. InCon- ference on Robot Learning, pages 408–432. PMLR...

    2025

  33. [41]

    Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training

    Xiaohua Zhai, Basil Mustafa, Alexander Kolesnikov, and Lucas Beyer. Sigmoid loss for language image pre-training. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 11975–11986, 2023. 4

    2023

  34. [42]

    Query-efficient imitation learning for end-to-end autonomous driving.arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.06450, 2016

    Jiakai Zhang and Kyunghyun Cho. Query-efficient imitation learning for end-to-end autonomous driving.arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.06450, 2016. 18

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Uni-navid: A video-based vision- language-action model for unifying embodied navigation tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06224, 2024

    Jiazhao Zhang, Kunyu Wang, Shaoan Wang, Minghan Li, Haoran Liu, Songlin Wei, Zhongyuan Wang, Zhizheng Zhang, and He Wang. Uni-navid: A video-based vision- language-action model for unifying embodied navigation tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.06224, 2024. 2, 3, 6, 7

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    3d-vla: a 3d vision-language-action generative world model

    Haoyu Zhen, Xiaowen Qiu, Peihao Chen, Jincheng Yang, Xin Yan, Yilun Du, Yining Hong, and Chuang Gan. 3d-vla: a 3d vision-language-action generative world model. InPro- ceedings of the 41st International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 61229–61245, 2024. 3

    2024

  37. [45]

    Navgpt: Explicit reasoning in vision-and-language navigation with large lan- guage models

    Gengze Zhou, Yicong Hong, and Qi Wu. Navgpt: Explicit reasoning in vision-and-language navigation with large lan- guage models. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 7641–7649, 2024. 3

    2024

  38. [46]

    Esc: Ex- ploration with soft commonsense constraints for zero-shot object navigation

    Kaiwen Zhou, Kaizhi Zheng, Connor Pryor, Yilin Shen, Hongxia Jin, Lise Getoor, and Xin Eric Wang. Esc: Ex- ploration with soft commonsense constraints for zero-shot object navigation. InInternational Conference on Machine Learning, pages 42829–42842. PMLR, 2023. 3

    2023

  39. [47]

    Move to understand a 3d scene: Bridging visual grounding and exploration for efficient and versatile embod- ied navigation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.04047, 2025

    Ziyu Zhu, Xilin Wang, Yixuan Li, Zhuofan Zhang, Xiaojian Ma, Yixin Chen, Baoxiong Jia, Wei Liang, Qian Yu, Zhidong Deng, et al. Move to understand a 3d scene: Bridging visual grounding and exploration for efficient and versatile embod- ied navigation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507....

    2025 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Tango: training-free embodied ai agents for open-world tasks

    Filippo Ziliotto, Tommaso Campari, Luciano Serafini, and Lamberto Ballan. Tango: training-free embodied ai agents for open-world tasks. InProceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Conference, pages 24603–24613,

  41. [2025]

    Dependence of the success rate (SR) on the confidence threshold of the YOLOE model for different categories from theval seensplit of HM3D-OVON

    3, 6, 7 Figure G. Dependence of the success rate (SR) on the confidence threshold of the YOLOE model for different categories from theval seensplit of HM3D-OVON. The plots are shown for the top 10 categories by number of episodes. Figure H. Dependence of the success rate (SR) ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.