Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 55 references

Integrals of motion on extremals of the equation Euler-Lagrange

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that Wronsky determinants of fundamental matrices of closed first-order moment systems built from the Jacobi equation are integrals of motion along extremals of the Euler-Lagrange equation.

desk verdict The supplied full text is a different paper, so I can only judge the abstract; the Wronskian integral-of-motion claim is plausible but hinges on an unstated moment-closure assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11735 v1 pith:Z7O73ND5 submitted 2025-08-15 physics.class-ph

V. P. Koshcheev This is my paper
classification physics.class-ph MSC 49K0534A30
keywords Euler-LagrangeequationJacobiintegralsofmotionWronskianmomentsclosedsystemsODEscalculusvariationssecondvariation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to establish a new class of conserved quantities for variational problems. It starts with the Jacobi equation, the linear equation governing infinitesimal perturbations of an extremal of an Euler-Lagrange equation, and constructs from it a chain of closed systems of first-order ordinary differential equations that describe the evolution of 'moments' of these perturbations. The central result is that the Wronskian determinant of a fundamental matrix of any such closed system is an integral of motion: it stays constant along any extremal. If true, this brings the second-variation theory of the calculus of variations into contact with the theory of integrable systems and offers a systematic way to generate constants of motion for extremals.

What carries the argument

The central objects are (1) the Jacobi equation, the second-order linear ODE that describes infinitesimal variations of an extremal; (2) the 'moments' of these variations, which the paper organizes into a chain of closed systems of first-order ODEs; and (3) the Wronsky determinant of a fundamental matrix of such a system, which is the quantity proved to be an integral of motion along the extremal. The Jacobi equation supplies the coefficients and the closure mechanism, the moment systems carry the time evolution, and the Wronskian supplies the conserved quantity.

What would settle it

Take a concrete variational problem with a known extremal, such as the harmonic oscillator action $S=\int(\frac{1}{2}\dot{q}^2-\frac{1}{2}\omega^2 q^2)\,dt$, derive the Jacobi equation along a non-trivial extremal, follow the paper's recipe to build the moment system, and integrate a fundamental matrix numerically; if the Wronskian of that matrix varies between two points on the extremal, the claimed integral of motion is false for that example.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the Jacobi equation—the linearized Euler-Lagrange equation along an extremal—can be leveraged to form closed systems of first-order ODEs whose unknowns are 'moments' of the variations. For each such closed system, the Wronskian (Wronsky determinant) of a fundamental matrix of solutions is shown to be constant along the extremal. Consequently, every extremal carries a family of conserved quantities that are derived purely from the linearized (second-order) structure of the variational problem, rather than from its Noether symmetries. The paper's construction may therefore provide a universal source of integrals of motion attached to solutions of

Load-bearing premise

The construction assumes that the moments can be grouped into a finite closed system of first-order ordinary differential equations; the abstract does not say for which Lagrangians or under what conditions such closure is possible.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Every extremal of an Euler-Lagrange equation carries conserved quantities built from the Jacobi equation, independent of the symmetries that produce the usual conserved quantities.
  • These Wronskian integrals can be evaluated by integrating a finite closed system of first-order ODEs, so they are practically computable along a given extremal.
  • The chain construction provides a systematic way to pass from the linearized (Jacobi) equation to nonlinear relations among solutions, giving a new family of invariants of the extremal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: if the closure of the moment systems holds for a wide class of Lagrangians, the method would connect the second variation of the action to integrable systems, giving a new angle on the question of when a variational problem is completely integrable.
  • Inference: the Wronskian integrals might be related to the Maslov index or the number of conjugate points, meaning they could serve as a stability invariant for extremals; the paper does not claim this.
  • Inference: applying the construction to simple test cases (e.g., quadratic Lagrangians, geodesics on symmetric spaces) would reveal whether the 'moments' are familiar objects such as the variance of Gaussian fluctuations around the extremal; this is a guess, not a claim of the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript (arXiv:2508.11735) presents, in its abstract, two claims: (1) that a chain of closed systems of first-order ordinary differential equations describing the evolution of moments can be constructed using the Jacobi equation, and (2) that Wronsky determinants of fundamental matrices of such closed systems are integrals of motion on extremals of the Euler–Lagrange equation. The submitted full text, however, is a different preprint (arXiv:2508.11734v2) on acceleration radiation from derivative-coupled atoms falling into modified-gravity black holes. Consequently, the actual derivation, definitions, assumptions, and examples of the paper under review are not available. The reviewable content is limited to the abstract, which states the claims without the supporting construction or proof.

Significance. If the claims are correct, the paper would establish a new class of conserved quantities for variational problems, connecting Jacobi fields, moment hierarchies, and Wronskian determinants to first integrals on extremals. This could be of interest to the calculus of variations and to the theory of ordinary differential equations. However, the significance is conditional: the construction is not specified, and the assertion that a finite closed moment system exists is nontrivial and cannot be assessed from the abstract alone. The manuscript also provides no machine-checked proofs, reproducible code, or worked examples in the available material, so the claimed results are presently unverified.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text / Abstract] The full text supplied with the manuscript is not the paper under review. arXiv:2508.11735 is titled 'Integrals of motion on extremals of the equation Euler-Lagrange', but the full text is arXiv:2508.11734v2, 'Acceleration Radiation from Derivative-Coupled Atoms Falling in Modified Gravity Black Holes', by Pantig and Övgün. This is a load-bearing problem: the central claims of the abstract—the construction of a closed moment system from the Jacobi equation and the constancy of Wronskian determinants—cannot be checked without the actual derivation. I cannot verify soundness, assumptions, or correctness of the stated results.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that 'a chain of closed systems of first order ordinary differential equations describing the evolution of moments can be constructed using the Jacobi equation.' No definition of the 'moments' is given, and no class of Lagrangians is specified. For a general Lagrangian, moments of Jacobi fields do not necessarily close into a finite-dimensional system; closure is a structural property that must be proved and depends on the form of the Lagrangian and the chosen moment variables. Without this specification, the claimed construction is underdetermined and cannot be evaluated. This is exactly the load-bearing point: if no finite closed system exists, there is no fundamental matrix and the Wronskian integral of motion is either undefined or vacuous.
  3. [Abstract] The second claim states that 'Wronsky determinants for fundamental matrices of closed systems of first order ordinary differential equations are integrals of motion on extremals of the Euler-Lagrange equation.' This is not a general property of arbitrary linear systems: for a fundamental matrix of y' = A(x)y, the Wronskian evolves as W' = tr(A) W and is constant only under trace-zero or other special conditions. The abstract does not state which structure of the moment system ensures constancy, nor how the Euler-Lagrange extremal condition enters. A derivation is required to show that the Wronskian is not merely a known quantity in disguise or a trivial consequence of the definition of the moments.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Title/Abstract] The spelling 'Wronsky' is nonstandard; the usual spelling is 'Wronskian.' This should be corrected throughout the manuscript.
  2. [Full text] The full text mismatch is presumably a submission error, but it must be fixed before any review can proceed. The manuscript should be accompanied by its own full text, not another paper's.
  3. [Abstract] The phrase 'closed systems of first order ordinary differential equations' appears twice; the author may wish to define the term 'closed' explicitly (e.g., finite-dimensional, autonomous, or invariant under the evolution) in the introduction.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity demonstrable from abstract; full text is unavailable/mismatched.

full rationale

The only evidence for arXiv:2508.11735 is its abstract; the supplied full text is for arXiv:2508.11734 and is unrelated to the target paper. From the abstract alone, no circular step can be exhibited: it contains no equations, no definitions of 'moments', no closure conditions, and no derivation chain. The statement that Wronskians of fundamental matrices of first-order systems are integrals of motion on Euler–Lagrange extremals is a standard consequence of Abel's identity whenever the relevant linear system has zero trace (as is typical for Jacobi/Hamiltonian systems), but the abstract does not specify enough to determine whether the paper merely renames this known fact or derives something new. Without the full text, I cannot quote any equation or construction that reduces an output to an input, so no circularity is established. The mismatched full text creates a verification gap, but that is not a circularity finding under the stated rules.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no free parameters, explicit axioms, or invented entities are identified. The report cannot enumerate the ledger without the full derivation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrals of motion on extremals of the equation Euler-Lagrange." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Z7O73ND5

@misc{pith2026250811735,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrals of motion on extremals of the equation Euler-Lagrange},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Z7O73ND5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11735}
}
read the original abstract

It is shown that a chain of closed systems of first order ordinary differential equations describing the evolution of moments can be constructed using the Jacobi equation. It is shown that Wronsky determinants for fundamental matrices of closed systems of first order ordinary differential equations are integrals of motion on extremals of the Euler-Lagrange equation.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Black holes and the second law,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and the second law,” Lett. Nuovo Cim.4, 737–740 (1972)

    work page 1972

  2. [2]

    Black holes and entropy,

    Jacob D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D7, 2333–2346 (1973)

    1973

  3. [3]

    Black hole explosions,

    S. W. Hawking, “Black hole explosions,” Nature248, 30–31 (1974)

    1974

  4. [4]

    Particle Creation by Black Holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle Creation by Black Holes,” Commun. Math. Phys.43, 199–220 (1975), [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  5. [5]

    Notes on black hole evaporation,

    W. G. Unruh, “Notes on black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. D14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  6. [6]

    Acceleration Radiation and Generalized Second Law of Thermodynamics,

    W. G. Unruh and Robert M. Wald, “Acceleration Radiation and Generalized Second Law of Thermodynamics,” Phys. Rev. D25, 942–958 (1982)

    work page 1982

  7. [7]

    What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle,

    William G. Unruh and Robert M. Wald, “What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle,” Phys. Rev. D 29, 1047–1056 (1984)

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    The Unruh effect and its applications,

    Luis C. B. Crispino, Atsushi Higuchi, and George E. A. Matsas, “The Unruh effect and its applications,” Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 787–838 (2008), arXiv:0710.5373 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2008

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time,

    Bryce S. DeWitt, “Quantum Field Theory in Curved Space-Time,” Phys. Rept.19, 295–357 (1975)

    1975

  2. [10]

    Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,

    David G. Boulware, “Quantum Field Theory in Schwarzschild and Rindler Spaces,” Phys. Rev. D11, 1404 (1975)

    1975

  3. [11]

    Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Path Integral Derivation of Black Hole Radiance,” Phys. Rev. D13, 2188–2203 (1976)

    1976

  4. [12]

    Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration: Hawking-Unruh Effect in Rindler Manifold of Arbitrary Dimension,

    Shin Takagi, “Vacuum Noise and Stress Induced by Uniform Acceleration: Hawking-Unruh Effect in Rindler Manifold of Arbitrary Dimension,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.88, 1–142 (1986)

    1986

  5. [13]

    Entropy and area,

    Mark Srednicki, “Entropy and area,” Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 666–669 (1993), arXiv:hep-th/9303048

    1993 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Alice falls into a black hole: Entanglement in non-inertial frames,

    Ivette Fuentes-Schuller and Robert B. Mann, “Alice falls into a black hole: Entanglement in non-inertial frames,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 120404 (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0410172

    2005 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Modelling a Particle Detector in Field Theory,

    Fabio Costa and Federico Piazza, “Modelling a Particle Detector in Field Theory,” New J. Phys.11, 113006 (2009), arXiv:0805.0806 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Unruh-DeWitt detectors in spherically symmetric dynamical space-times,

    G. Acquaviva, R. Di Criscienzo, M. Tolotti, L. Vanzo, and S. Zerbini, “Unruh-DeWitt detectors in spherically symmetric dynamical space-times,” Int. J. Theor. Phys.51, 1555–1571 (2012), arXiv:1111.6389 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Quantum metrology and estimation of Unruh effect,

    Jieci Wang, Zehua Tian, Jiliang Jing, and Heng Fan, “Quantum metrology and estimation of Unruh effect,” Sci. Rep.4, 7195 (2014), arXiv:1405.1940 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Particle Detectors, Cavities, and the Weak Equivalence Principle,

    Erickson Tjoa, Robert B. Mann, and Eduardo Martin-Martinez, “Particle Detectors, Cavities, and the Weak Equivalence Principle,” Phys. Rev. D98, 085004 (2018), arXiv:1807.07628 [quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Near-horizon aspects of acceleration radiation by free fall of an atom into a black hole,

    H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, and C. R. Ordonez, “Near-horizon aspects of acceleration radiation by free fall of an atom into a black hole,” Phys. Rev. D102, 085010 (2020), arXiv:2009.06580 [gr-qc]

    2020 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Harvesting entanglement with detectors freely falling into a black hole,

    Kensuke Gallock-Yoshimura, Erickson Tjoa, and Robert B. Mann, “Harvesting entanglement with detectors freely falling into a black hole,” Phys. Rev. D104, 025001 (2021), arXiv:2102.09573 [quant-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Entanglement in Unruh, Hawking, and Cherenkov radiation from a quantum optical perspective,

    Marlan O. Scully, Anatoly Svidzinsky, and William Unruh, “Entanglement in Unruh, Hawking, and Cherenkov radiation from a quantum optical perspective,” Phys. Rev. Res.4, 033010 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    Generalized Unruh effect: A potential resolution to the black hole information paradox,

    Angela Chen, “Generalized Unruh effect: A potential resolution to the black hole information paradox,” Phys. Rev. D107, 056014 (2023), arXiv:2302.12256 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Wavepacket detection with the Unruh-DeWitt model,

    Eduardo Martin-Martinez, Miguel Montero, and Marco del Rey, “Wavepacket detection with the Unruh-DeWitt model,” Phys. Rev. D87, 064038 (2013), arXiv:1207.3248 [quant-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Particle detectors and the zero mode of a quantum field,

    Eduardo Martin-Martinez and Jorma Louko, “Particle detectors and the zero mode of a quantum field,” Phys. Rev. D90, 024015 (2014), arXiv:1404.5621 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Spatially extended Unruh-DeWitt detectors for relativistic quantum information,

    Antony R. Lee and Ivette Fuentes, “Spatially extended Unruh-DeWitt detectors for relativistic quantum information,” Phys. Rev. D89, 085041 (2014), arXiv:1211.5261 [quant-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Onset and decay of the 1 + 1 Hawking-Unruh effect: what the derivative-coupling detector saw,

    Benito A. Ju´ arez-Aubry and Jorma Louko, “Onset and decay of the 1 + 1 Hawking-Unruh effect: what the derivative-coupling detector saw,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, 245007 (2014), arXiv:1406.2574 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Unruh-DeWitt detector response across a Rindler firewall is finite,

    Jorma Louko, “Unruh-DeWitt detector response across a Rindler firewall is finite,” JHEP09, 142 (2014), arXiv:1407.6299 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Unruh-DeWitt detector differentiation of black holes and exotic compact objects,

    Bob Holdom, Robert B. Mann, and Chen Zhang, “Unruh-DeWitt detector differentiation of black holes and exotic compact objects,” Phys. Rev. D103, 124046 (2021), arXiv:2011.10179 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Unruh-DeWitt detector in dimensionally-reduced static spherically symmetric spacetimes,

    Erickson Tjoa and Robert B. Mann, “Unruh-DeWitt detector in dimensionally-reduced static spherically symmetric spacetimes,” JHEP03, 014 (2022), arXiv:2202.04084 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    NonMarkovianity in cosmology: Memories kept in a quantum field,

    Jen-Tsung Hsiang and Bei-Lok Hu, “NonMarkovianity in cosmology: Memories kept in a quantum field,” Annals Phys.434, 168656 (2021), arXiv:2107.04862 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Unruh Acceleration Radiation Revisited,

    J. S. Ben-Benjaminet al., “Unruh Acceleration Radiation Revisited,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A34, 1941005 (2019), arXiv:1906.01729 [quant-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Quantum optics approach to radiation from atoms falling into a black hole,

    Marlan O. Scully, Stephen Fulling, David Lee, Don N. Page, Wolfgang Schleich, and Anatoly Svidzinsky, “Quantum optics approach to radiation from atoms falling into a black hole,” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.115, 8131–8136 (2018), arXiv:1709.00481 [quant-ph]. 15

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Excitation of an Atom by a Uniformly Accelerated Mirror through Virtual Transitions,

    Anatoly A. Svidzinsky, Jonathan S. Ben-Benjamin, Stephen A. Fulling, and Don N. Page, “Excitation of an Atom by a Uniformly Accelerated Mirror through Virtual Transitions,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 071301 (2018)

    2018

  26. [34]

    Acceleration radiation of an atom freely falling into a Kerr black hole and near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics,

    A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ordonez, and M. O. Scully, “Acceleration radiation of an atom freely falling into a Kerr black hole and near-horizon conformal quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. D104, 065006 (2021), arXiv:2011.08368 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: I. Master equation for acceleration radiation,

    A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ordonez, and M. O. Scully, “Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: I. Master equation for acceleration radiation,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021), 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084086, arXiv:2108.07570 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: II. Thermodynamics of acceleration radiation,

    A. Azizi, H. E. Camblong, A. Chakraborty, C. R. Ordonez, and M. O. Scully, “Quantum optics meets black hole ther- modynamics via conformal quantum mechanics: II. Thermodynamics of acceleration radiation,” Phys. Rev. D104(2021), 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.084085, arXiv:2108.07572 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Unruh detectors and quantum chaos in JT gravity,

    Andreas Blommaert, Thomas G. Mertens, and Henri Verschelde, “Unruh detectors and quantum chaos in JT gravity,” JHEP03, 086 (2021), arXiv:2005.13058 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Antonin Coutant,On the phenomenology of quantum gravity : stability properties of Hawking radiation in the presence of ultraviolet violation of local Lorentz invariance, Theses, Universit´ e Paris Sud - Paris XI (2012)

    2012

  31. [39]

    Observational signature of Lorentz violation in acceleration radiation,

    Yu Tang, Wentao Liu, and Jieci Wang, “Observational signature of Lorentz violation in acceleration radiation,” (2025), arXiv:2502.03043 [gr-qc]

    2025

  32. [40]

    Equivalence principle and HBAR entropy of an atom falling into a quantum corrected black hole,

    Soham Sen, Rituparna Mandal, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Equivalence principle and HBAR entropy of an atom falling into a quantum corrected black hole,” Phys. Rev. D105, 085007 (2022), arXiv:2202.00671 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Near horizon aspects of acceleration radiation of an atom falling into a class of static spherically symmetric black hole geometries,

    Soham Sen, Rituparna Mandal, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Near horizon aspects of acceleration radiation of an atom falling into a class of static spherically symmetric black hole geometries,” Phys. Rev. D106, 025004 (2022), arXiv:2205.11260 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Horizon brightened accelerated radiation in the background of braneworld black holes,

    Ashmita Das, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Horizon brightened accelerated radiation in the background of braneworld black holes,” Phys. Rev. D109, 064087 (2024), arXiv:2311.13557 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Atom falling into a quantum corrected charged black hole and HBAR entropy,

    Arpita Jana, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Atom falling into a quantum corrected charged black hole and HBAR entropy,” Phys. Rev. D110, 026029 (2024), arXiv:2405.13087 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Inverse logarithmic correction in the horizon brightened acceleration radiation entropy of an atom falling into a renormalization group improved charged black hole,

    Arpita Jana, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Inverse logarithmic correction in the horizon brightened acceleration radiation entropy of an atom falling into a renormalization group improved charged black hole,” Phys. Rev. D111, 085017 (2025), arXiv:2501.17579 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  37. [45]

    HBAR entropy of Infalling Atoms into a GUP-corrected Schwarzschild Black Hole and equivalence principle,

    Ali ¨Ovg¨ un and Reggie C. Pantig, “HBAR entropy of Infalling Atoms into a GUP-corrected Schwarzschild Black Hole and equivalence principle,” (2025), arXiv:2506.10621 [gr-qc]

    2025

  38. [46]

    Derivative coupling in horizon brightened acceleration radiation: a quantum optics approach,

    Ashmita Das, Anjana Krishnan, Soham Sen, and Sunandan Gangopadhyay, “Derivative coupling in horizon brightened acceleration radiation: a quantum optics approach,” (2025), arXiv:2505.16897 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Nonthermal acceleration radiation of atoms near a black hole in presence of dark energy,

    Syed Masood A. S. Bukhari, Imtiyaz Ahmad Bhat, Chenni Xu, and Li-Gang Wang, “Nonthermal acceleration radiation of atoms near a black hole in presence of dark energy,” Phys. Rev. D107, 105017 (2023), arXiv:2211.08793 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Seeing dark matter via acceleration radiation,

    Syed Masood A. S. Bukhari and Li-Gang Wang, “Seeing dark matter via acceleration radiation,” Phys. Rev. D109, 045009 (2024), arXiv:2309.11958 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Impact of Lorentz violation on Radiative transition of an atom falling into spherically symmetric black hole and related BHAR entropy,

    Anisur Rahaman, “Impact of Lorentz violation on Radiative transition of an atom falling into spherically symmetric black hole and related BHAR entropy,” (2025), arXiv:2503.23553 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    An atom in front of Lorentz violating Kalb-Ramond black hole background,

    Anisur Rahaman, “An atom in front of Lorentz violating Kalb-Ramond black hole background,” (2025), arXiv:2506.01006 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Extended Uncertainty Principle Black Holes,

    J. R. Mureika, “Extended Uncertainty Principle Black Holes,” Phys. Lett. B789, 88–92 (2019), arXiv:1812.01999 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Global monopole in a Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity,

    Fernando M. Belchior, Roberto V. Maluf, Albert Yu. Petrov, and Paulo J. Porf ´ ırio, “Global monopole in a Ricci-coupled Kalb–Ramond bumblebee gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C85, 658 (2025), arXiv:2502.17267 [gr-qc]

    2025 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Natural extension of the Generalised Uncertainty Principle,

    Cosimo Bambi and F. R. Urban, “Natural extension of the Generalised Uncertainty Principle,” Class. Quant. Grav.25, 095006 (2008), arXiv:0709.1965 [gr-qc]

    2008 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait,

    Gia Dvali and Cesar Gomez, “Black Hole’s Quantum N-Portrait,” Fortsch. Phys.61, 742–767 (2013), arXiv:1112.3359 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Extended Uncertainty Principle for Rindler and cosmological horizons,

    Mariusz P. Dabrowski and Fabian Wagner, “Extended Uncertainty Principle for Rindler and cosmological horizons,” Eur. Phys. J. C79, 716 (2019), arXiv:1905.09713 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.