Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 55 references

Deep Learning For Point Cloud Denoising: A Survey

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The first systematic survey of deep-learning point cloud denoising organizes the field into two subproblems.

desk verdict A plausible survey framing with an unsupported 'first comprehensive survey' claim, and the provided text is too corrupted to check anything else. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.11932 v1 pith:WXGHYRG3 submitted 2025-08-16 cs.CV

Chengwei Zhang , Xueyi Zhang , Mingrui Lao , Tao Jiang , Xinhao Xu , Wenjie Li , Fubo Zhang , Longyong Chen This is my paper
classification cs.CV
keywords pointclouddenoisingdeeplearningsurveytaxonomyoutlierremovalsurfacenoiserestoration3Dvision
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Real-world point clouds carry noise, and denoising is the preprocessing step that makes downstream tasks such as reconstruction, segmentation, and recognition reliable. This paper argues that deep-learning methods now surpass traditional denoising and that the field has grown enough to need a structured overview. It proposes to view denoising as two linked subproblems: removing outlier points and restoring the surface from noisy inlier positions. On that basis, the paper classifies existing methods, compares their similarities and trade-offs, and identifies open challenges and future directions. The contribution is a map of the field, not a new denoising algorithm.

What carries the argument

The organizing device is a task decomposition of point cloud denoising into outlier removal and surface noise restoration. This two-step scheme acts as the taxonomy backbone: every surveyed method is positioned according to which of the two subproblems it targets and how it combines them. It is what lets the survey compare methods that otherwise look architecturally different.

What would settle it

Finding a peer-reviewed systematic survey of deep-learning point cloud denoising published before this one, or locating a published denoising method with reported results that cannot be placed in either the outlier-removal or the surface-restoration category, would undercut the paper's central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that no prior survey systematically covers deep-learning-based point cloud denoising, and that the field can be organized by a two-step formulation: first detect and remove outliers, then restore surface noise on the remaining points. Working from that definition, the paper builds a taxonomy of deep-learning denoising methods, summarizes the main technical contributions within each category, and compares methods by similarity, difference, and advantage. It also reviews the key challenges that remain and outlines directions for future work. If the coverage holds, researchers gain a single reference that defines the task, orders the methods, and shows where progress is sti

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the survey's literature coverage is complete, so that no earlier systematic survey of deep-learning point cloud denoising exists and every significant method fits the proposed taxonomy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Practitioners can use the two-step decomposition to diagnose why a denoising pipeline fails: either outliers survive or the surface estimate is still rough.
  • New methods can be positioned within the taxonomy by stating which subproblem they address, making the literature easier to compare.
  • Benchmarking and evaluation can be organized around the two subproblems separately rather than only reporting end-to-end metrics.
  • The limitations the survey identifies define a checklist of unsolved issues for researchers working on point cloud denoising.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not argue this, but the two-step formulation implies a modular design in which outlier removal and surface restoration are trained separately; methods treating both jointly may be needed when outlier and surface noise are entangled.
  • The paper does not argue this, but if its coverage is indeed the first, its inclusion criteria become as important as its taxonomy, because later surveys will use it as a baseline.
  • A testable extension beyond the paper would be to turn the taxonomy into a leaderboard: assign each method to its cell and see whether performance gaps correlate with which subproblem a method emphasizes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims to be the first comprehensive survey of deep-learning-based point cloud denoising (PCD). It proposes a two-step taxonomy that separates PCD into outlier removal and surface noise restoration, and states that it compares existing methods, discusses limitations, and outlines future directions. The abstract is readable and makes these claims, but the supplied full text is severely corrupted by an encoding error and includes the header of a different arXiv paper (arXiv:2508.11933 [cs.CL]). As a result, the substantive content of the survey—taxonomy details, method descriptions, comparisons, and discussion—cannot be inspected or verified.

Significance. If the claimed comprehensive survey were fully readable, it would provide a useful structured reference for a rapidly growing area. The proposed two-step formulation is a plausible organizing principle, and a careful mapping of existing methods onto it could be a genuine contribution. However, the current submission does not allow this contribution to be assessed. The paper contains no derivations, predictions, or reproducible artifacts; its value rests entirely on literature coverage and organization, both of which are unverifiable in the provided text. The strength of the abstract is its clear statement of scope and intended taxonomy, but that strength is undermined by the absence of any readable supporting content.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (all pages)] The entire full text is encoding-corrupted (mojibake) and contains the header 'arXiv:2508.11933v1 [cs.CL]', which is a different paper. Consequently, the proposed taxonomy, the method summaries, the comparative tables, and the discussion of limitations and future directions cannot be inspected. Since the paper's central claim is comprehensiveness of a survey, this corruption makes the manuscript unverifiable in its current form and prevents any substantive evaluation.
  2. [Abstract] The claim to be the first comprehensive survey is a negative existential claim about all prior literature. The abstract provides no search methodology, no inclusion/exclusion criteria, no list of databases, and no time window. The phrase 'to our best knowledge' is an appropriate hedge but does not substitute for a documented literature-search procedure. Unless the unreadable full text contains such a methodology, this load-bearing claim is unsupported.
  3. [Abstract / Proposed taxonomy] The two-step formulation—outlier removal and surface noise restoration—is asserted to 'encompass most scenarios and requirements of PCD.' No definitions, illustrations, or evidence are visible in the readable material. Because the taxonomy is the paper's main organizational contribution, its coverage claim needs to be demonstrated with concrete examples and mapping of representative methods; this is not possible with the current corrupted text.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'compare methods in terms of similarities, differences, and respective advantages' is vague. A survey abstract should indicate the comparison axes, e.g., architecture, loss function, noise type, or computational cost.
  2. [Metadata] The text includes the arXiv header of a different submission (cs.CL). The authors should verify that the correct PDF/source was uploaded.
  3. [Full text] Even where numbers and table-like fragments are visible, the surrounding labels and captions are unreadable. After re-encoding, the authors should ensure that all tables and figures render correctly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: survey contains no derivation or prediction; the 'first comprehensive survey' claim is a verifiability issue, not a circularity issue.

full rationale

This is a survey paper, not a derivation-based work. It proposes a taxonomy (outlier removal and surface noise restoration) and summarizes existing methods, but it does not fit parameters, derive equations, or make predictions from its own inputs. The abstract's 'to our best knowledge' hedge about being the first comprehensive survey is a negative existential claim that would need search methodology or external validation, but that is a matter of completeness and verifiability, not circularity. The full text provided is corrupted and even contains a header from a different arXiv paper (cs.CL), which prevents internal inspection of the taxonomy and comparisons; however, document corruption is a quality/integrity issue, not a circular-reasoning issue. No self-citation is visible in the abstract, and no claim in the provided text reduces by definition to its own inputs. Therefore, no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The survey's central contribution is its taxonomy and coverage. Both rest on assumptions about the completeness and correctness of the literature review, which cannot be checked from the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption No prior comprehensive survey of DL-based PCD exists.
    Negative existential claim asserted in the abstract without a documented search protocol.
  • domain assumption The two-step formulation (outlier removal + surface noise restoration) covers most PCD scenarios.
    Taxonomy proposed in the abstract; not demonstrated to be exhaustive.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Deep Learning For Point Cloud Denoising: A Survey." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WXGHYRG3

@misc{pith2026250811932,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Deep Learning For Point Cloud Denoising: A Survey},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WXGHYRG3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.11932}
}
read the original abstract

Real-world environment-derived point clouds invariably exhibit noise across varying modalities and intensities. Hence, point cloud denoising (PCD) is essential as a preprocessing step to improve downstream task performance. Deep learning (DL)-based PCD models, known for their strong representation capabilities and flexible architectures, have surpassed traditional methods in denoising performance. To our best knowledge, despite recent advances in performance, no comprehensive survey systematically summarizes the developments of DL-based PCD. To fill the gap, this paper seeks to identify key challenges in DL-based PCD, summarizes the main contributions of existing methods, and proposes a taxonomy tailored to denoising tasks. To achieve this goal, we formulate PCD as a two-step process: outlier removal and surface noise restoration, encompassing most scenarios and requirements of PCD. Additionally, we compare methods in terms of similarities, differences, and respective advantages. Finally, we discuss research limitations and future directions, offering insights for further advancements in PCD.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Slide: Self-supervised lidar de-snowing through reconstruction difficulty

    Gwangtak Bae, Byungjun Kim, Seongyong Ahn, Jihong Min, and Inwook Shim. Slide: Self-supervised lidar de-snowing through reconstruction difficulty. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 283--300. Springer, 2022

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Deep point set resampling via gradient fields

    Haolan Chen, Shitong Luo, Wei Hu, et al. Deep point set resampling via gradient fields. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 45(3):2913--2930, 2022

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Repcd-net: Feature-aware recurrent point cloud denoising network

    Honghua Chen, Zeyong Wei, Xianzhi Li, Yabin Xu, Mingqiang Wei, and Jun Wang. Repcd-net: Feature-aware recurrent point cloud denoising network. International Journal of Computer Vision , 130(3):615--629, 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Geogcn: Geometric dual-domain graph convolution network for point cloud denoising

    Zhaowei Chen, Peng Li, Zeyong Wei, Honghua Chen, Haoran Xie, Mingqiang Wei, and Fu Lee Wang. Geogcn: Geometric dual-domain graph convolution network for point cloud denoising. In ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pages 1--5. IEEE, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Inferring neural signed distance functions by overfitting on single noisy point clouds through finetuning data-driven based priors

    Chao Chen, Yu-Shen Liu, and Zhizhong Han. Inferring neural signed distance functions by overfitting on single noisy point clouds through finetuning data-driven based priors. In The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems , 2024

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    A survey on graph neural networks and graph transformers in computer vision: A task-oriented perspective

    Chaoqi Chen, Yushuang Wu, Qiyuan Dai, Hong-Yu Zhou, Mutian Xu, Sibei Yang, Xiaoguang Han, and Yizhou Yu. A survey on graph neural networks and graph transformers in computer vision: A task-oriented perspective. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2024

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Progressive point cloud denoising with cross-stage cross-coder adaptive edge graph convolution network

    Wu Chen, Hehe Fan, Qiuping Jiang, Chao Huang, and Yi Yang. Progressive point cloud denoising with cross-stage cross-coder adaptive edge graph convolution network. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 6578--6587, 2024

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Contrastive learning for joint normal estimation and point cloud filtering

    Dasith de Silva Edirimuni, Xuequan Lu, Gang Li, and Antonio Robles-Kelly. Contrastive learning for joint normal estimation and point cloud filtering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 2023

    work page 2023

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    Iterativepfn: True iterative point cloud filtering

    Dasith de Silva Edirimuni, Xuequan Lu, Zhiwen Shao, Gang Li, Antonio Robles-Kelly, and Ying He. Iterativepfn: True iterative point cloud filtering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 13530--13539, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    Straightpcf: Straight point cloud filtering

    Dasith de Silva Edirimuni, Xuequan Lu, Gang Li, Lei Wei, Antonio Robles-Kelly, and Hongdong Li. Straightpcf: Straight point cloud filtering. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 20721--20730, 2024

    2024

  3. [11]

    Cnn-based lidar point cloud de-noising in adverse weather

    Robin Heinzler, Florian Piewak, Philipp Schindler, and Wilhelm Stork. Cnn-based lidar point cloud de-noising in adverse weather. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 5(2):2514--2521, 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    Dynamic point cloud denoising via gradient fields

    Qianjiang Hu and Wei Hu. Dynamic point cloud denoising via gradient fields. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.08755 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Surface reconstruction from point clouds: A survey and a benchmark

    Zhangjin Huang, Yuxin Wen, Zihao Wang, Jinjuan Ren, and Kui Jia. Surface reconstruction from point clouds: A survey and a benchmark. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 2024

    2024

  6. [14]

    A single-stage point cloud cleaning network for outlier removal and denoising

    Ying Li and Huankun Sheng. A single-stage point cloud cleaning network for outlier removal and denoising. Pattern Recognition , 138:109366, 2023

    2023

  7. [15]

    Pointcvar: Risk-optimized outlier removal for robust 3d point cloud classification

    Xinke Li, Junchi Lu, Henghui Ding, Changsheng Sun, Joey Tianyi Zhou, and Yeow Meng Chee. Pointcvar: Risk-optimized outlier removal for robust 3d point cloud classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 38, pages 21340--21348, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    Pcdnf: Revisiting learning-based point cloud denoising via joint normal filtering

    Zheng Liu, Yaowu Zhao, Sijing Zhan, Yuanyuan Liu, Renjie Chen, and Ying He. Pcdnf: Revisiting learning-based point cloud denoising via joint normal filtering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    Pyramidpcd: A novel pyramid network for point cloud denoising

    Zheng Liu, Weijie Zhou, Chuchen Guo, Qinjun Qiu, and Zhong Xie. Pyramidpcd: A novel pyramid network for point cloud denoising. Pattern Recognition , page 111228, 2024

    2024

  10. [18]

    Deep feature-preserving normal estimation for point cloud filtering

    Dening Lu, Xuequan Lu, Yangxing Sun, and Jun Wang. Deep feature-preserving normal estimation for point cloud filtering. Computer-Aided Design , 125:102860, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Differentiable manifold reconstruction for point cloud denoising

    Shitong Luo and Wei Hu. Differentiable manifold reconstruction for point cloud denoising. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on multimedia , pages 1330--1338, 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Score-based point cloud denoising

    Shitong Luo and Wei Hu. Score-based point cloud denoising. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 4583--4592, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Learning signed distance functions from noisy 3d point clouds via noise to noise mapping

    Baorui Ma, Yu-Shen Liu, and Zhizhong Han. Learning signed distance functions from noisy 3d point clouds via noise to noise mapping. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Pd-flow: A point cloud denoising framework with normalizing flows

    Aihua Mao, Zihui Du, Yu-Hui Wen, Jun Xuan, and Yong-Jin Liu. Pd-flow: A point cloud denoising framework with normalizing flows. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 398--415. Springer, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Denoising point clouds in latent space via graph convolution and invertible neural network

    Aihua Mao, Biao Yan, Zijing Ma, and Ying He. Denoising point clouds in latent space via graph convolution and invertible neural network. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 5768--5777, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Mixing-denoising generalizable occupancy networks

    Amine Ouasfi and Adnane Boukhayma. Mixing-denoising generalizable occupancy networks. In 2024 International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) , pages 1103--1114. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    4denoisenet: Adverse weather denoising from adjacent point clouds

    Alvari Sepp \"a nen, Risto Ojala, and Kari Tammi. 4denoisenet: Adverse weather denoising from adjacent point clouds. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters , 8(1):456--463, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Paris-rue-madame database: A 3d mobile laser scanner dataset for benchmarking urban detection, segmentation and classification methods

    Andr \'e s Serna, Beatriz Marcotegui, Fran c ois Goulette, and Jean-Emmanuel Deschaud. Paris-rue-madame database: A 3d mobile laser scanner dataset for benchmarking urban detection, segmentation and classification methods. In 4th international conference on pattern recognition...

    2014

  19. [27]

    Advancing 3d point cloud understanding through deep transfer learning: A comprehensive survey

    Shahab Saquib Sohail, Yassine Himeur, Hamza Kheddar, Abbes Amira, Fodil Fadli, Shadi Atalla, Abigail Copiaco, and Wathiq Mansoor. Advancing 3d point cloud understanding through deep transfer learning: A comprehensive survey. Information Fusion , page 102601, 2024

    2024

  20. [28]

    Sitf: A self-supervised iterative training framework for point cloud denoising

    Zhiyong Su, Changchang Wang, Kun Jiang, Kai Jiang, and Weiqing Li. Sitf: A self-supervised iterative training framework for point cloud denoising. Computer-Aided Design , 179:103812, 2025

    2025

  21. [29]

    Benchmarking robustness of 3d point cloud recognition against common corruptions

    Jiachen Sun, Qingzhao Zhang, Bhavya Kailkhura, Zhiding Yu, Chaowei Xiao, and Z Morley Mao. Benchmarking robustness of 3d point cloud recognition against common corruptions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.12296 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    A critical revisit of adversarial robustness in 3d point cloud recognition with diffusion-driven purification

    Jiachen Sun, Jiongxiao Wang, Weili Nie, Zhiding Yu, Zhuoqing Mao, and Chaowei Xiao. A critical revisit of adversarial robustness in 3d point cloud recognition with diffusion-driven purification. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 33100--33114. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  23. [31]

    P2p-bridge: Diffusion bridges for 3d point cloud denoising

    Mathias Vogel, Keisuke Tateno, Marc Pollefeys, Federico Tombari, Marie-Julie Rakotosaona, and Francis Engelmann. P2p-bridge: Diffusion bridges for 3d point cloud denoising. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 184--201. Springer, 2025

    2025

  24. [32]

    Mesh denoising via cascaded normal regression

    Peng-Shuai Wang, Yang Liu, and Xin Tong. Mesh denoising via cascaded normal regression. ACM Trans. Graph. , 35(6):232--1, 2016

    2016

  25. [33]

    Pointfilternet: A filtering network for point cloud denoising

    Xingtao Wang, Xiaopeng Fan, and Debin Zhao. Pointfilternet: A filtering network for point cloud denoising. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 33(3):1276--1290, 2022

    2022

  26. [34]

    Random screening-based feature aggregation for point cloud denoising

    Weijia Wang, Wei Pan, Xiao Liu, Kui Su, Bernard Rolfe, and Xuequan Lu. Random screening-based feature aggregation for point cloud denoising. Computers & Graphics , 116:64--72, 2023

    2023

  27. [35]

    Fcnet: Learning noise-free features for point cloud denoising

    Xingtao Wang, Wenxue Cui, Ruiqin Xiong, Xiaopeng Fan, and Debin Zhao. Fcnet: Learning noise-free features for point cloud denoising. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 33(11):6288--6301, 2023

    2023

  28. [36]

    Learning implicit fields for point cloud filtering

    Jinxi Wang, Xuequan Lu, Meili Wang, Fei Hou, and Ying He. Learning implicit fields for point cloud filtering. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 2024

    2024

  29. [37]

    Noise4denoise: Leveraging noise for unsupervised point cloud denoising

    Weijia Wang, Xiao Liu, Hailing Zhou, Lei Wei, Zhigang Deng, Manzur Murshed, and Xuequan Lu. Noise4denoise: Leveraging noise for unsupervised point cloud denoising. Computational Visual Media , pages 1--11, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Geodualcnn: Geometry-supporting dual convolutional neural network for noisy point clouds

    Mingqiang Wei, Honghua Chen, Yingkui Zhang, Haoran Xie, Yanwen Guo, and Jun Wang. Geodualcnn: Geometry-supporting dual convolutional neural network for noisy point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 29(2):1357--1370, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Pathnet: Path-selective point cloud denoising

    Zeyong Wei, Honghua Chen, Liangliang Nan, Jun Wang, Jing Qin, and Mingqiang Wei. Pathnet: Path-selective point cloud denoising. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Attention-based point cloud edge sampling

    Chengzhi Wu, Junwei Zheng, Julius Pfrommer, and J\"urgen Beyerer. Attention-based point cloud edge sampling. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2023

    2023

  33. [41]

    Gradient-based point cloud denoising with uniformity

    Tian-Xing Xu, Yuan-Chen Guo, Yong-Liang Yang, and Song-Hai Zhang. Gradient-based point cloud denoising with uniformity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.10279 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Point cloud denoising with fine-granularity dynamic graph convolutional networks

    Wenqiang Xu, Wenrui Dai, Duoduo Xue, Ziyang Zheng, Chenglin Li, Junni Zou, and Hongkai Xiong. Point cloud denoising with fine-granularity dynamic graph convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.14158 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Point cloud resampling with learnable heat diffusion

    Wenqiang Xu, Wenrui Dai, Duoduo Xue, Ziyang Zheng, Chenglin Li, Junni Zou, and Hongkai Xiong. Point cloud resampling with learnable heat diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.14120 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Benchmarking the robustness of lidar semantic segmentation models

    Xu Yan, Chaoda Zheng, Ying Xue, Zhen Li, Shuguang Cui, and Dengxin Dai. Benchmarking the robustness of lidar semantic segmentation models. International Journal of Computer Vision , pages 1--24, 2024

    2024

  37. [45]

    Pn-internet: Point-and-normal interactive network for noisy point clouds

    Cheng Yi, Zeyong Wei, Jingbo Qiu, Honghua Chen, Jun Wang, and Mingqiang Wei. Pn-internet: Point-and-normal interactive network for noisy point clouds. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing , 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Lisnownet: Real-time snow removal for lidar point clouds

    Ming-Yuan Yu, Ram Vasudevan, and Matthew Johnson-Roberson. Lisnownet: Real-time snow removal for lidar point clouds. In 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) , pages 6820--6826. IEEE, 2022

    2022

  39. [47]

    Pointfilter: Point cloud filtering via encoder-decoder modeling

    Dongbo Zhang, Xuequan Lu, Hong Qin, and Ying He. Pointfilter: Point cloud filtering via encoder-decoder modeling. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 27(3):2015--2027, 2020

    2015

  40. [48]

    Pd-refiner: An underlying surface inheritance refiner with adaptive edge-aware supervision for point cloud denoising

    Chengwei Zhang, Xueyi Zhang, Xianghu Yue, Mingrui Lao, Tao Jiang, Jiawei Wang, Fubo Zhang, and Longyong Chen. Pd-refiner: An underlying surface inheritance refiner with adaptive edge-aware supervision for point cloud denoising. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conf...

    2024

  41. [49]

    A comprehensive study of the robustness for lidar-based 3d object detectors against adversarial attacks

    Yifan Zhang, Junhui Hou, and Yixuan Yuan. A comprehensive study of the robustness for lidar-based 3d object detectors against adversarial attacks. International Journal of Computer Vision , 132(5):1592--1624, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    From noise addition to denoising: A self-variation capture network for point cloud optimization

    Tianming Zhao, Peng Gao, Tian Tian, Jiayi Ma, and Jinwen Tian. From noise addition to denoising: A self-variation capture network for point cloud optimization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 2022

    2022

  43. [51]

    Point cloud denoising via momentum ascent in gradient fields

    Yaping Zhao, Haitian Zheng, Zhongrui Wang, Jiebo Luo, and Edmund Y Lam. Point cloud denoising via momentum ascent in gradient fields. In 2023 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pages 161--165. IEEE, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    Triplemixer: A 3d point cloud denoising model for adverse weather

    Xiongwei Zhao, Congcong Wen, Yang Wang, Haojie Bai, and Wenhao Dou. Triplemixer: A 3d point cloud denoising model for adverse weather. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.13802 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Fast learning of signed distance functions from noisy point clouds via noise to noise mapping

    Junsheng Zhou, Baorui Ma, and Yu-Shen Liu. Fast learning of signed distance functions from noisy point clouds via noise to noise mapping. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 2024

    2024

  46. [54]

    3dmambaipf: A state space model for iterative point cloud filtering via differentiable rendering

    Qingyuan Zhou, Weidong Yang, Ben Fei, Jingyi Xu, Rui Zhang, Keyi Liu, Yeqi Luo, and Ying He. 3dmambaipf: A state space model for iterative point cloud filtering via differentiable rendering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05522 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence '...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.