Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 33 references

From plasma to pattern: observation and characterization of periodic structure formation in dielectric breakdown channels of electron-irradiated insulators

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The 80-micron stripes in electron-irradiated PMMA breakdown channels are imprinted by the z-pinch entropy mode during the nanosecond discharge, not by later cooling or cracking.

desk verdict Genuine observation and a plausible mechanism, but the wavelength anchor is shaky enough that the entropy-mode case is a fit, not a prediction. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.12592 v1 pith:BRTL7IYW submitted 2025-08-18 physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.plasm-ph

Nick R. Schwartz , Bryson C. Clifford , Carolyn Chun , Emily H. Frashure , Kathryn M. Sturge , Noah Hoppis , Holly Wilson , Meryl Wiratmo
show 6 more authors
Jack R. FitzGibbon Ethan T. Basinger Brian L. Beaudoin Raymond J. Phaneuf John Cumings Timothy W. Koeth
This is my paper
classification physics.app-phcond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.plasm-ph
keywords dielectricbreakdownLichtenbergfiguresivy-modechannelsz-pinchentropymodePMMAplasmainstabilityperiodicstructureelectron-irradiatedinsulators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dielectric breakdown of insulating polymers leaves tree-like damage channels, and in a fast-growing 'ivy-mode' of breakdown in electron-irradiated PMMA these channels carry regular ~80 μm stripes. This paper argues the stripes are not a post-discharge artifact: Raman maps show carbon deposition tracks channel width, placing structure formation inside the nanosecond plasma discharge. It rules out two solid-state candidates—stress-driven surface undulations and a capillary (Plateau-Rayleigh) instability—because they require unphysical material parameters or operate on the wrong timescale. The surviving candidate is the z-pinch entropy mode, a temperature-gradient-driven plasma instability, whose dispersion relation matches the observed wavelength for channel currents near the measured 217±21 A and for plausible plasma densities and temperatures (0.1–1% of solid density, 10–100 eV). If right, the wavelength of breakdown patterns becomes a readout of plasma conditions inside an insulator during discharge.

What carries the argument

The z-pinch entropy mode: a plasma instability that grows when the ion gyroradius is comparable to or larger than the channel radius, preventing ions from conserving their magnetic moment and producing non-adiabatic heating. It couples misaligned density and temperature gradients at nearly constant pressure, so it naturally puts higher plasma temperature where the channel is wider. The carrying tool is the drift-ideal MHD dispersion relation (Eq. 40 of [33]), which the paper evaluates over plasma density, temperature, composition, and current to find parameter sets that reproduce kR = 2.8.

What would settle it

Time-resolved spectroscopy of a single discharge channel (for instance Stark broadening of hydrogen or carbon emission lines) during the nanosecond discharge: measured electron densities and temperatures far outside 0.1–1% of solid density and 10–100 eV, or a measured wavelength that does not track channel radius as kR ≈ 2.8, would falsify the entropy-mode assignment.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the regular modulations in ivy-mode breakdown channels form during the discharge phase itself, by the z-pinch entropy mode. In this picture, the high-current plasma column behaves as a z-pinch; when the ion gyroradius is not tiny compared to the channel radius (kρi ≳ 1), ions cannot conserve magnetic moment, and coupled density-temperature gradients at roughly constant pressure grow as an entropy mode. Using the dispersion relation of [33], the observed dimensionless wavenumber kR = 2.8 maps to electron densities around 0.1–1% of solid density and temperatures around 10–100 eV, with per-channel currents of order 100–500 A—consistent with the independently me

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the measured stripe wavelength being set by the fastest-growing linear entropy mode under roughly uniform plasma conditions, so that matching the dispersion relation actually reveals the plasma density and temperature.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The periodic stripe wavelength is determined during the nanosecond discharge, so the existing post-discharge gas-flow skewing (Raman phase shifts) only modifies, rather than creates, the pattern.
  • A measured stripe wavelength and channel radius can be inverted through the entropy-mode dispersion relation to estimate the electron density (0.1–1% of solid) and temperature (10–100 eV) inside a breakdown channel.
  • The mechanism predicts a threshold: only channels with high enough current density (kρi > 1) should develop stripes, explaining why periodicity appears in some ivy-mode channels and not others.
  • The measured ~200 A single-channel currents sit inside the model's predicted 100–500 A window, supporting use of the z-pinch picture for breakdown-channel plasmas.
  • If the mechanism holds, discharge morphology can be anticipated from plasma conditions, offering a route to predict—and possibly steer—breakdown paths in radiation-hard insulators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the wavelength is truly set by the fastest-growing linear mode, then across many channels the data should collapse to a single dimensionless wavenumber (kR ≈ 2.8) whenever stripes appear; a scatter of kR values across channels would require a nonlinear or radius-selection mechanism the paper leaves open.
  • The mode's sensitivity to ion composition implies a testable cross-material prediction: polymers with different elemental ratios should show different stripe wavelengths at the same current, because the entropy-mode dispersion depends on ion charge-to-mass composition.
  • The boundary layer around each channel is also periodic in the images; an extension would be to treat the ablation/carbon-deposition response as a nonlinear marker of the temperature perturbation, which could let the stripe amplitude calibrate the plasma temperature variation quantitatively.
  • The proposed threshold suggests a practical control lever: tuning beam current or pre-charge to adjust channel current density could switch a material between smooth and striped breakdown, effectively writing the discharge pattern.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports periodic modulations (~80 µm wavelength) along ivy-mode dielectric breakdown channels in electron-irradiated PMMA and proposes that they are formed by the z-pinch entropy mode plasma instability during the nanosecond discharge phase. The authors support this through Raman spectroscopy correlating carbon deposition with channel width, rejection of two post-discharge mechanisms (Asaro-Tiller-Grinfeld and Plateau-Rayleigh), and a dispersion-relation analysis based on the Angus et al. entropy-mode model that yields plausible plasma parameters. Current measurements (~200 A per channel) are offered as experimental validation. The central claim is that the entropy mode, not thermal or mechanical post-discharge processes, governs periodic structure formation.

Significance. If the central claim survives scrutiny, this would be a notable advance: it connects plasma instability theory to a real dielectric-breakdown morphology, provides a testable framework for predicting discharge features, and could inform radiation-hardness engineering. The paper's strengths include the quantitative rejection of the ATG and PRI mechanisms, the direct current measurement from isolated channels, and the use of Raman mapping to link carbon deposition to channel geometry. The entropy-mode hypothesis is physically plausible and the inferred plasma parameters are not unreasonable. However, the positive case rests on a small number of quantitative anchors, and the fitting procedure and wavelength uncertainty need to be addressed before the claim is fully supported.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Fig. 3] The paper reports λ≈80 µm and kR=2.8 as the input to the theoretical fit, but the only quantitative periodicity in the Raman lineout is 60.1±6.1 µm, measured from only three periods. These two values are not reconciled. If the actual dominant wavelength is ~60 µm, kR becomes ~3.7 (a ~32% change), which will shift the inferred plasma density and temperature contours in Fig. 6. Since the wavelength is the sole quantitative link between observation and the entropy-mode dispersion relation, this inconsistency is load-bearing. Please either justify why the Raman channel-width periodicity differs from the 'characteristic wavelength' used for kR, or redo the theoretical comparison with the measured value and propagate its uncertainty.
  2. [§3.2.3, Fig. 6 and Eq. (40)] The dispersion relation is solved backwards: the observed kR is inserted, and n_e, T_e, ion composition, and current are varied until Eq. (40) is satisfied. The resulting plasma parameters are therefore fitted, not predicted. The current measurement (217±21 A) is a weak consistency check because Fig. 6 already treats current as a free parameter over 100–1000 A. To support the mechanism, please provide a forward calculation that predicts the wavelength from independently chosen plasma conditions, or at minimum a sensitivity analysis showing how the inferred parameters and the mechanism identification change over the full range of kR allowed by the measured wavelength and radius. The statement in §3.1 that the observed wavenumber 'represents the most unstable mode' also needs support; nonlinear saturation or radius selection could set the observed wavelength instead.
  3. [§3.1, TOST analysis] The statistical support for the correlation between carbon deposition and channel width is weak: the Raman lineout contains only three periods, and the TOST equivalence margins are 32.4%, 40.2%, and 85.3% for the D, G, and PMMA modes, respectively. Calling this 'strong quantitative evidence' is an overstatement. This matters because the correlation is used to infer that plasma temperature was higher in wider channel regions, which is a key element of the entropy-mode argument. Please present the actual p-values, confidence intervals, and a more careful statement of what can be concluded from three periods.
  4. [§3.2.3, §3.3] No growth-rate calculation is provided to show that the entropy mode can grow to the observed nonlinear amplitude within the discharge duration (~tens of nanoseconds). The paper notes that the mode operates on the nanosecond timescale, but merely having a wavelength match is insufficient; the growth time must be shorter than the lifetime of the plasma channel. Please include an explicit estimate of the linear growth rate from the Angus et al. dispersion relation for representative parameters, and compare it with the discharge timescale.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] Units appear inconsistent: '1.5µC cm−2' is stated in one place and '1.5µC m−2' in another; please verify and unify.
  2. [§3.1] The text states that the periodic structures 'extend many millimeters with very consistent periodicity' but the quantitative Raman measurement is over only 148 µm and three periods. Clarify whether the consistency claim is from optical/SEM images and, if so, provide the measurement basis.
  3. [Fig. 6] The figure would benefit from error bars or shaded bands representing the uncertainty in kR from the measured wavelength and radius, and from explicit marking of the measured current range (217±21 A).
  4. [§3.2.2] The PRI rejection is clear for kR=2.8, but the statement 'viscoelastic effects only serve to further stabilize the system' should cite the specific regime of the Tamim–Bostwick model (e.g., the parameter range relevant to PMMA at elevated temperature) to be fully rigorous.
  5. [General] The paper would benefit from a table listing all measured quantities (λ, R, kR, current, Raman periodicity) with uncertainties, since the argument depends heavily on these values.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The entropy-mode 'prediction' is an inverse fit: the observed kR=2.8 is inserted into Eq. 40, plasma parameters are varied to match it, and the resulting values are then called predicted plasma parameters that 'produce' the wavelength.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.2.3, around Figure 6 (also abstract)]
    "We modeled the entropy mode using the dispersion relation (Eq. 40) from Angus et al. [33], varying the plasma density and temperature to match the observed wave number. ... The predicted plasma parameters are physically reasonable: electron densities of 0.1–1% of solid density, electron temperatures of 10–100 eV, and individual channel currents of 100–500 A. This was validated by current measurements ... the average peak current was 217 ± 21 A per channel."

    The derivation chain is: Section 3.1 measures λ ≈ 80 µm and R ≈ 35 µm, defines kR = 2.8, and Section 3.2.3 then varies n_e, T_e, composition, and current until the Angus et al. dispersion relation reproduces that same kR. The resulting (n_e, T_e, I) values are then called 'predicted plasma parameters' and the abstract says the entropy mode 'produces wavelengths consistent with' them. This reverses the logical direction: the wavelength is the fitted target, not a forward prediction of the mechanism. Since the dispersion relation has free plasma parameters, any observed wavelength can in principle be mapped to some admissible parameter band, so the inferred plasma state does not independently confirm the mechanism. The measured 217 ± 21 A current is an external check, but Fig. 6 also varies

full rationale

The paper is not circular in the self-citation sense: the entropy-mode dispersion relation comes from external work (Angus et al.), the ATG/PRI rejections use external material parameters, and the Raman/correlation analysis is original. The main circularity is the inverse-solve presented as prediction: observed kR is used to solve for plasma conditions, and those conditions are then cited as demonstrating that the entropy mode 'produces' the observed wavelength. This is a fit labeled as a match. The current measurement is the only independent quantitative check, but it is compared to a model range that already includes current as a fitted free parameter, so the validation is weak. Separately, the paper reports λ ≈ 80 µm in Section 3.1 while the Raman lineout in the same section gives a 60.1 ± 6.1 µm channel-width periodicity; this is an internal inconsistency that undermines the kR anchor, though it is a data-consistency risk rather than a circularity. Self-citations to the group's prior ivy-mode work provide context and measurement methodology but are not load-bearing for the instability identification itself. Overall, the central support for the entropy-mode mechanism reduces to a backward-fit consistency check, warranting a partial-circularity score of 6 rather than a stronger definitional collapse.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a published dispersion relation, the identification of the observed wavelength with the fastest-growing linear mode, uniformity assumptions for the channel plasma, and a temperature-carbon deposition link. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced; the free parameters are the plasma density, temperature, composition, and current, which are tuned to match the observed wavenumber.

free parameters (4)
  • plasma electron density n_e = 0.1-1% of solid PMMA density (~1e26-1e27 m^-3)
    Tuned so that the entropy mode dispersion relation (Eq. 40 of Angus et al.) reproduces the observed wavenumber kR=2.8 (Section 3.2.3, Figure 6).
  • plasma electron temperature T_e = 10-100 eV
    Tuned together with n_e to match the observed kR; the curves in Figure 6 are iso-wavenumber loci, not independent predictions.
  • plasma ion composition = varied (e.g., 1/3 C6+, 2/15 O8+, 8/15 H+ for PMMA stoichiometry)
    Solid lines in Figure 6 vary ion composition at fixed 200 A current; composition is a free parameter in the fit.
  • discharge current I = 100-1000 A range considered; measured 217±21 A
    Dashed lines in Figure 6 vary current at fixed composition. The measured current is used as a consistency check after being an input parameter in the model.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The dispersion relation for the z-pinch entropy mode given by Eq. (40) of Angus et al. [33] is valid for the plasma conditions in the discharge channel.
    Invoked in Section 3.2.3 to compute allowed (n_e, T_e) pairs; the paper does not re-derive or test this relation for the high-collisionality, small-radius channel plasma.
  • domain assumption The observed dominant wavenumber kR=2.8 is the fastest-growing linear mode of the instability.
    Section 3.1 states the analysis focuses on the dominant wavenumber 'which represents the most unstable mode'; nonlinear or multi-mode effects are not modeled.
  • domain assumption The plasma column during discharge is a quasi-uniform z-pinch with a single density and temperature for each modeled case.
    Used throughout Section 3.2.3; real channels have radial and axial gradients, and the discharge evolves on nanosecond timescales.
  • domain assumption Carbon deposition rate increases with plasma temperature, so D/G Raman intensity correlates with local plasma temperature.
    Section 3.1 relies on refs [8,9] to interpret the Raman-width correlation as evidence that wider regions were hotter during discharge.
  • domain assumption The plasma channel can be described as a z-pinch with ions satisfying kρ_i > 1, the entropy mode regime.
    Section 3.2.3 assumes the entropy mode is dominant when kρ_i > 1 and uses contours to show most fitted solutions lie in this regime; the validity of the drift-ideal MHD model for these parameters is not independently established.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From plasma to pattern: observation and characterization of periodic structure formation in dielectric breakdown channels of electron-irradiated insulators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BRTL7IYW

@misc{pith2026250812592,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From plasma to pattern: observation and characterization of periodic structure formation in dielectric breakdown channels of electron-irradiated insulators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BRTL7IYW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.12592}
}
read the original abstract

Dielectric breakdown of insulators is one of the most common failure modes of electronics in the high-radiation environment of space, but its mechanics remain poorly understood. When electron-irradiated polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) undergoes breakdown, the resulting channels exhibit striking periodic structures with characteristic wavelengths ~80 {\mu}m in the recently identified ivy-mode channels. These previously unobserved modulations offer unique insights into the physics of ultra-fast dielectric breakdown. Through materials characterization and theoretical modeling, we identify the physical instability mechanism responsible for these structures. Raman spectroscopy reveals that carbon deposition correlates with channel width variations, indicating that periodic structure formation occurs during the plasma discharge phase. We evaluated three candidate instability mechanisms: the Asaro-Tiller-Grinfeld instability, the Plateau-Rayleigh instability, and the z-pinch entropy mode. The first two mechanisms operate on incompatible timescales and require unphysical material parameters to match observations. In contrast, the z-pinch entropy mode operates during the nanosecond discharge phase and produces wavelengths consistent with plasma densities of 0.1-1% of solid density and temperatures of 10-100 eV. Current measurements from isolated discharge channels (~200 A) validate theoretical predictions for the entropy mode. These findings establish that the entropy mode plasma instability during the discharge phase, rather than post discharge thermal or mechanical processes, govern periodic structure formation in breakdown channels. This work provides new insights into the physics of dielectric breakdown and establishes a framework for predicting discharge morphology and characteristics in insulators.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.12592 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A backlit photograph of a discharged PMMA sample of dimensions 30.5 cm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Optical microscopy under polarized light and (b) SEM images of ivy-mode periodic channels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Raman spectral analysis of discharge channel showing D-mode (top), G-mode (middle), and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic diagrams of three candidate instability mechanisms for periodic channel structures. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Required elastic modulus as a function of Poisson’s ratio for the ATG instability to match observed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Predicted plasma parameters for z-pinch entropy mode instability matching observed wave num [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Timeline describing the key events during the formation of the periodic structures. The plasma [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. M. Cooke, Space-Charge-Induced Breakdown in Dielectrics, Technical Report, MIT HIGH VOLTAGE RESEARCH LAB, 1986

    work page 1986

  2. [2]

    Koons, J

    H. Koons, J. Mazur, R. Selesnick, J. Blake, J. Fennell, J. Roeder, P. Anderson, The impact of the space environment on space systems, NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N (1999) 69036–69041

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Hoppis, K

    N. Hoppis, K. M. Sturge, J. E. Barney, B. L. Beaudoin, A. M. Bussio, A. E. Hammell, S. L. Henderson, J. E. Krutzler, J. P. Lichthardt, A. H. Mueller, K. Smith, B. C. Tappan, T. W. Koeth, Imaging high jitter, very fast phenomena: A remedy for shutter lag, Review of Scientific Instruments 94 (2023). doi:10.1063/5.0168764

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0168764 2023

  4. [4]

    K. M. Sturge, N. Hoppis, A. Anandanatarajan, A. M. Bussio, B. C. Clif- ford, E. H. Frashure, M. E. Hiebert, J. E. Krutzler, T. W. Koeth, In- cident beam current impact on space-charge retention in electron dyna- mitron irradiated polymethyl methacrylate, APL Materials 12 (2024). URL: /aip/apm/article/12/3/031119/3271378/Incident-beam-current-impact-on-spa...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0191534/3271378 2024

  5. [5]

    Montano, C

    T. Montano, C. Chun, K. Sturge, N. Hoppis, A. Shearin, J. Hannan, T. Koeth, Simu- lation and modeling of prompt electrical tree formation during dielectric breakdown in space-charged dielectrics, IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation (2025) 1–1. doi:10.1109/TDEI.2025.3550102

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    K. M. Sturge, N. Hoppis, B. L. Beaudoin, A. M. Shearin, E. T. Basinger, B. C. Clifford, J. R. FitzGibbon, E. H. Frashure, J. E. Krutzler, A. A. Levi- tan, P. O’Shea, H. J. Wilson, T. W. Koeth, Characterization of electrostatic dis- charge currents in electron-charged polymethyl methacrylate as a proxy for natu- ral compact intracloud discharges, Physical ...

    work page doi:10.1103/m62y-7lf8 2025

  7. [7]

    K. M. Sturge, N. Hoppis, A. M. Bussio, J. Barney, B. Beaudoin, C. Brown, B. Carlsten, C. Chun, B. C. Clifford, J. Cumings, N. Dallmann, J. Fitzgibbon, E. H. Frashure, A. E. Hammell, J. Hannan, S. L. Henderson, M. E. Hiebert, J. Krutzler, J. Lichthardt, M. Marr-Lyon, T. Montano, N. Moody, A. Mueller, P. O’Shea, R. Schneider, K. Smith, B. Tappan, C. Tiemann...

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Konuma, Film Deposition by Plasma Techniques, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992

    M. Konuma, Film Deposition by Plasma Techniques, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1992. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84511-6

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84511-6 1992

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    A. L. Yarin, B. Rovagnati, F. Mashayek, T. Matsoukas, A re- action model for plasma coating of nanoparticles by amorphous carbon layers, Journal of Applied Physics 99 (2006). URL: /aip/jap/article/99/6/064310/293026/A-reaction-model-for-plasma-coating-of. doi:10.1063/1.2183587/293026

    2006 doi

  2. [10]

    Grinfeld, On the stress driven instability of thin solid films, Mechanics Research Communications 20 (1993) 223–225

    M. Grinfeld, On the stress driven instability of thin solid films, Mechanics Research Communications 20 (1993) 223–225. doi:10.1016/0093-6413(93)90061-R

    1993 doi

  3. [11]

    M. A. Grinfeld, The stress driven instability in elastic crystals: Mathe- matical models and physical manifestations, Journal of Nonlinear Science 3 (1993) 35–83. URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02429859. doi:10.1007/BF02429859/METRICS

    1993 doi

  4. [12]

    Kohlert, K

    P. Kohlert, K. Kassner, C. Misbah, Large-amplitude behavior of the grinfeld instabil- ity: a variational approach, The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter 35 (2003) 493–504. URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1140/epjb/e2003-00302-5. doi:10.1140/epjb/e2003-00302-5

    2003 doi

  5. [13]

    Colin, J

    J. Colin, J. Grilhé, N. Junqua, Surface instabilities of a stressed cylindrical whisker, Philosophical Magazine A 76 (1997) 793–805. doi:10.1080/01418619708214211

    1997 doi

  6. [14]

    Colin, L

    J. Colin, L. Thilly, F. Lecouturier, J. Peyrade, S. Askénazy, J. Grilhé, Axial and radial interface instabilities of copper/tantalum cylindrical conductors, Acta Materialia 47 (1999) 2761–2768. URL: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1359645499001263. doi:10.1016/S1...

    1999 doi

  7. [15]

    R. C. Cammarata, Surface and interface stress effects in thin films, Progress in Surface Science 46 (1994) 1–38. doi:10.1016/0079-6816(94)90005-1

    1994 doi

  8. [16]

    Huang, H

    D. Huang, H. Liu, Energy-principle-based analysis of elastic instability in polymer cylinders subject to surface tension, Journal of Applied Polymer Science 141 (2024). doi:10.1002/APP.55751. 15

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    D. Y. Kwok, A. Leung, C. N. Lam, A. Li, R. Wu, A. W. Neumann, Low-rate dynamic contact angles on poly(methyl methacrylate) and the determination of solid surface tensions, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 206 (1998) 44–51. URL: https://www-sciencedirect-com.proxy-um.re...

    1998

  10. [18]

    A. A. Abdel-Wahab, S. Ataya, V. V. Silberschmidt, Temperature- dependent mechanical behaviour of pmma: Experimental anal- ysis and modelling, Polymer Testing 58 (2017) 86–95. URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0142941816311540. doi:10.1016/J.POLYMERTES...

    2017 doi

  11. [19]

    J. R. McLoughlin, A. V. Tobolsky, The viscoelastic behavior of polymethyl methacry- late, Journal of Colloid Science 7 (1952) 555–568. doi:10.1016/0095-8522(52)90039-1

    1952 doi

  12. [20]

    P. J. Dooling, C. P. Buckley, S. Hinduja, The onset of nonlinear viscoelasticity in multiaxial creep of glassy polymers: A constitutive model and its application to pmma, Polymer Engineering and Science 38 (1998) 892–904. doi:10.1002/pen.10256

    1998 doi

  13. [21]

    Mathiesen, D

    D. Mathiesen, D. Vogtmann, R. B. Dupaix, Characterization and constitu- tive modeling of stress-relaxation behavior of poly(methyl methacrylate) (pmma) across the glass transition temperature, Mechanics of Materials 71 (2014) 74–84. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2014.01.003

    2014 doi

  14. [22]

    S. I. Tamim, J. B. Bostwick, Plateau–rayleigh instability in a soft viscoelastic material, Soft Matter 17 (2021) 4170–4179. URL: https://pubs-rsc-org.proxy-um.researchport.umd.edu/en/content/articlehtml/2021/sm/d1sm00019e https://pubs-rsc-org.proxy-um.researchport.umd.edu/en/c...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    M. G. Haines, A review of the dense z -pinch, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 53 (2011) 093001. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0741-3335/53/9/093001. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/53/9/093001

    2011 doi

  16. [24]

    Coppins, Ideal magnetohydrodynamic linear instabilities in the z- pinch, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 30 (1988) 201

    M. Coppins, Ideal magnetohydrodynamic linear instabilities in the z- pinch, Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 30 (1988) 201. URL: https://iopscience-iop-org.proxy-um.researchport.umd.edu/article/10.1088/0741-3335/30/3/002 https://iopscience-iop-org.proxy-um.researchport.umd...

    1988 doi

  17. [25]

    M. A. Liberman, J. S. D. Groot, A. Toor, R. B. Spielman, Physics of high-density z-pinch plasmas, Physics of High-Density Z-Pinch Plasmas (1999). doi:10.1007/978-1- 4612-1424-3. 16

    1999 doi

  18. [26]

    B. B. Kadomtsev, Convective pinch instability, J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.) 37 (1960) 1096–1101

    1960

  19. [27]

    A. A. Ware, Comparison between theory and experiment for the stability of the toroidal pinch discharge, in: Nucl. Fusion Suppl. Part 3, 1962, p. 869

    1962

  20. [28]

    MIKHAILOVSKAIA, Oscillations of an inhomogeneous plasma with a finite pres- sure, Sov

    L. MIKHAILOVSKAIA, Oscillations of an inhomogeneous plasma with a finite pres- sure, Sov. Phys. Tech. Phys. 12 (1968) 1451

    1968

  21. [29]

    A. B. MIKHAlLOVSKII, V. S. Tsypin, Instability of entropy waves due to the gyrore- laxation effects in a plasma of finite pressure, Soviet Physics JETP 32 (1971)

    1971

  22. [30]

    Kesner, Interchange modes in a collisional plasma, Physics of Plasmas 7 (2000) 3837–3840

    J. Kesner, Interchange modes in a collisional plasma, Physics of Plasmas 7 (2000) 3837–3840. doi:10.1063/1.1287915

    2000 doi

  23. [31]

    Kesner, R

    J. Kesner, R. J. Hastie, Electrostatic drift modes in a closed field line configuration, Physics of Plasmas 9 (2002) 395–400. doi:10.1063/1.1431594

    2002 doi

  24. [32]

    Ricci, B

    P. Ricci, B. N. Rogers, W. Dorland, M. Barnes, Gyrokinetic linear theory of the entropy mode in a z pinch, Physics of Plasmas 13 (2006) 62102. URL: /aip/pop/article/13/6/062102/1015232/Gyrokinetic-linear-theory-of-the-entropy-mode-in-a. doi:10.1063/1.2205830/1015232

    2006 doi

  25. [33]

    J. R. Angus, M. Dorf, V. I. Geyko, Drift-ideal magnetohydrodynamic simula- tions of m=0 modes in z-pinch plasmas, Physics of Plasmas 26 (2019) 72505. URL: https://pubs.aip.org/pop/article/26/7/072505/1060198/Drift-ideal-magnetohydrodynamic-simulations-of-m-0. doi:10.1063/1.5093625. 17

    2019 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.