REVIEW 1 cited by
Electric Penrose process in spherically symmetric regular black holes with and without a cosmological constant
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We investigate the electric Penrose process in Ay\'{o}n-Beato-Garc\'{i}a (ABG) black holes, both in the presence and absence of a cosmological constant, presenting, to the best of our knowledge, the first such analysis within the context of regular black holes. Our study systematically examines the effects of black hole charge and the cosmological constant on the formation of negative-energy states and the efficiency of energy extraction. Compared to Reissner-Nordstr\"{o}m (RN) black holes, ABG black holes exhibit a significantly larger negative-energy region, enabling the electric Penrose process to operate at larger distances from the event horizon and achieve higher energy extraction efficiency. This enhancement is particularly pronounced near the event horizon, where the performance gap widens with increasing black hole charge. Notably, even for astrophysically realistic values of charge and cosmological constant that approach vanishingly small values, distinct differences persist, yielding a maximum efficiency ratio of approximately $23/8$. These results suggest that, in realistic astrophysical scenarios, ABG black holes can accelerate charged particles more efficiently and serve as more powerful engines for energy extraction than their RN counterparts.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Electric Penrose process in the spacetime of a quantum-corrected Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole
Quantum corrections reduce electric Penrose energy extraction and can trap a fragment that would escape classically near critical turning points.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.