pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.13585 · v2 · pith:6CWJ75GBnew · submitted 2025-08-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Deterministic N\'eel vector switching of altermagnets via magnetic octupole torque

SeungYun Han , Insu Baek , Kyoung-Whan Kim , Hyun-Woo Lee , Suik Cheon This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 23:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetsNéel vectormagnetic octupolefield-free switchingspintronicsd-wave symmetrymultipole torquedomain control
0
0 comments X

The pith

Injecting magnetic octupoles enables field-free deterministic Néel vector switching in d-wave altermagnets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates a method to control altermagnets by injecting magnetic multipoles through an in-plane current applied to an altermagnet/normal metal bilayer. For d-wave altermagnets, this generates a magnetic octupole torque that switches the Néel vector deterministically without an external magnetic field and converts multidomain states into a single domain. A sympathetic reader would care because single-domain configurations are required for practical spintronic devices based on altermagnets, which offer potential advantages in speed and efficiency. The approach is presented as applicable to diverse altermagnets and as an example of using magnetic multipole currents more generally.

Core claim

We theoretically consider injecting magnetic multipoles into altermagnets, which can be achieved by applying an in-plane current to an altermagnet/normal metal bilayer. We demonstrate for d-wave altermagnets that the torque generated by the magnetic octupole injection can achieve magnetic-field-free deterministic switching of the altermagnets' Néel vector and transform their multidomain configurations into a single domain. This method allows the switching in diverse altermagnets, thereby facilitating their device applications and fundamental studies.

What carries the argument

Magnetic octupole torque arising from current-induced octupole injection in an altermagnet/normal metal bilayer, which acts on the Néel vector.

If this is right

  • Enables single-domain states in altermagnets without external magnetic fields.
  • Supports device applications of altermagnets by providing a practical switching method.
  • Extends magnetic multipole current techniques to control of the Néel vector.
  • Applies across a range of altermagnetic materials.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar multipole injection could be tested in other classes of altermagnets or related magnetic systems.
  • Device prototypes could incorporate this bilayer geometry to achieve field-free operation.
  • The method may link to broader studies of higher-order magnetic moments in spintronics.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic octupole torque produced by in-plane current injection has sufficient magnitude and correct direction to produce deterministic switching in real d-wave altermagnets.

What would settle it

An experiment applying in-plane current to a d-wave altermagnet/normal metal bilayer and checking whether the Néel vector switches deterministically without any applied magnetic field.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.13585 by Hyun-Woo Lee, Insu Baek, Kyoung-Whan Kim, SeungYun Han, Suik Cheon.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the N´eel vector switching in an AM/NM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Top panel: The N´eel vector dynamics induced by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Schematics of the DW dynamics in AMs driven bythe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Altermagnets have recently emerged as promising materials for next-generation spintronic devices. For their device applications, realizing a single-domain configuration is essential but remains challenging. We theoretically consider injecting magnetic multipoles into altermagnets, which can be achieved by applying an in-plane current to an altermagnet/normal metal bilayer. We demonstrate for $d$-wave altermagnets that the torque generated by the magnetic octupole injection can achieve magnetic-field-free deterministic switching of the altermagnets' N\'eel vector and transform their multidomain configurations into a single domain. This method allows the switching in diverse altermagnets, thereby facilitating their device applications and fundamental studies. This work also exemplifies the usefulness of magnetic multipole currents.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript theoretically examines current-induced injection of magnetic octupoles into d-wave altermagnets via an altermagnet/normal-metal bilayer. It claims that the resulting octupole torque produces deterministic, magnetic-field-free switching of the Néel vector and converts multidomain states into single domains, with the approach presented as generalizable across altermagnets.

Significance. If the central modeling result holds, the work would be significant for altermagnetic spintronics: single-domain control without external fields is a prerequisite for device applications, and the symmetry-based multipole-torque mechanism offers a distinct route from conventional spin-orbit torques. Explicit credit is due for the parameter-free symmetry derivation of the torque term and for framing the result in terms of falsifiable predictions for candidate materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3 and §4] §3 (torque derivation) and §4 (Néel-vector dynamics): The effective octupole torque is inserted into the LLG equation for the Néel vector, yet no quantitative comparison is made between the magnitude of the resulting effective field and the measured anisotropy constants or exchange fields of d-wave altermagnets (e.g., RuO2 or MnTe). This comparison is load-bearing for the deterministic-switching claim, because the torque must exceed the anisotropy barrier against realistic Gilbert damping.
  2. [Figure 5] Figure 5 / switching trajectories: The simulated reversal is shown for a single set of parameters, but the critical current density required to overcome anisotropy is not extracted or compared to experimentally accessible values; without this, it is unclear whether the torque remains sufficient once material-specific damping and domain-wall pinning are included.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: The notation 'N´eel' appears with inconsistent escaping; adopt a uniform rendering (Néel) throughout.
  2. [§2] §2: The bilayer symmetry argument for octupole injection would benefit from an explicit statement of the current direction relative to the altermagnetic crystal axes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments and the positive evaluation of the work's significance for altermagnetic spintronics. We address the major comments point by point below, agreeing where revisions are needed to strengthen the quantitative support for our claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 and §4] §3 (torque derivation) and §4 (Néel-vector dynamics): The effective octupole torque is inserted into the LLG equation for the Néel vector, yet no quantitative comparison is made between the magnitude of the resulting effective field and the measured anisotropy constants or exchange fields of d-wave altermagnets (e.g., RuO2 or MnTe). This comparison is load-bearing for the deterministic-switching claim, because the torque must exceed the anisotropy barrier against realistic Gilbert damping.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative comparison to material parameters is essential to substantiate the deterministic switching claim. Our torque derivation is symmetry-based and thus parameter-free in form, but the overall scale depends on the efficiency of octupole injection, which we will now estimate using literature values for spin-orbit coupling strengths and current densities in RuO2 and MnTe. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit estimates of the effective octupole field, compare it directly to reported anisotropy and exchange fields, and discuss the required current densities relative to realistic Gilbert damping values (α ≈ 0.01–0.1). These additions will clarify the regime in which the torque overcomes the anisotropy barrier. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Figure 5] Figure 5 / switching trajectories: The simulated reversal is shown for a single set of parameters, but the critical current density required to overcome anisotropy is not extracted or compared to experimentally accessible values; without this, it is unclear whether the torque remains sufficient once material-specific damping and domain-wall pinning are included.

    Authors: We acknowledge that presenting results for only one parameter set limits the assessment of experimental feasibility. We will revise the manuscript to extract the critical current density from the switching trajectories in Figure 5 (and additional simulations) and compare it to experimentally accessible values in candidate materials. We will also add a brief discussion of how finite Gilbert damping and domain-wall pinning may raise the threshold, supported by order-of-magnitude estimates or supplementary simulations, to demonstrate that the proposed mechanism remains viable within realistic parameter ranges. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent symmetry arguments

full rationale

The paper derives the magnetic octupole torque from in-plane current injection in an altermagnet/normal metal bilayer using standard symmetry considerations for d-wave altermagnets. This torque term is then inserted into the magnetization dynamics to demonstrate field-free deterministic Néel vector switching and single-domain stabilization. No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central claim rests on explicit symmetry-derived torque effects and their dynamical consequences, which are independent of the target result. The modeling is self-contained against external benchmarks such as bilayer symmetry rules.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work relies on domain assumptions from altermagnet symmetry and spintronics torque models; no free parameters or new entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption d-wave altermagnets possess symmetry allowing octupole torque to couple effectively to the Néel vector for deterministic switching.
    Invoked in the theoretical consideration of torque generation and switching.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5675 in / 1252 out tokens · 34985 ms · 2026-05-18T23:03:03.917459+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum- Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering, JPSJ88, 123702 (2019)

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Mo- 6 tome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic an- tiferromagnets, Nat. Commun.10, 12229 (2019)

    work page 2019

  3. [3]

    K.-H. Ahn, A. Hariki, K.-W. Lee, and J. Kuneˇ s, Antifer- romagnetism in RuO 2 asd-wave Pomeranchuk instabil- ity, Phys. Rev. B99, 184432 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [6]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Pre- diction of low-Zcollinear and noncollinear antiferro- magnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin–orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [7]

    Yuan and A

    L.-D. Yuan and A. Zunger, Degeneracy removal of spin bands in antiferromagnets with non-interconvertible spin-motif pair, Adv. Mater.35, 2211966 (2023)

    work page 2023

  7. [8]

    L.-D. Yuan, X. Zhang, C. Mera, and A. Zunger, Uncov- ering hidden spin polarization of energy bands in antifer- romagnets, Nat. Commun.14, 5301 (2023)

    work page 2023

  8. [9]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid instabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [10]

    Y. Noda, K. Ohno, and S. Nakamura, Momentum- dependent band spin splitting in semiconducting MnO 2: a density-functional calculation, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.18, 13294–13303 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [11]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    work page 2021

  11. [12]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [13]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal-rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [14]

    S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L.ˇSmejkal, and T. Jungwirth, Broken Kramers degeneracy in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [15]

    L. Han, X. Fu, R. Peng, X. Cheng, J. Dai, L. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W. Zhu, H. Bai, Y. Zhou, S. Liang, C. Chen, Q. Wang, X. Chen, L. Yang, Y. Zhang, C. Song, J. Liu, and F. Pan, Electrical 180 ◦ switching of N´ eel vector in spin-splitting antiferromagnet, Sci. Adv.10, eadn0479 (2024)

    work page 2024

  15. [16]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y. Tsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun.12, 26915 (2021)

    work page 2021

  16. [17]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    work page 2020

  17. [18]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Ef- ficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    work page 2021

  18. [19]

    A. Bose, N. J. Schreiber, R. Jain, D.-F. Shao, H. P. Nair, J. Sun, X. S. Zhang, D. A. Muller, E. Y. Tsymbal, D. G. Schlom, and D. C. Ralph, Tilted spin current generated by the collinear antiferromagnet ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron.5, 267 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 137201 (2022)

    work page 2022

  20. [21]

    F. Liu, Z. Zhang, X. Yuan, Y. Liu, S. Zhu, Z. Lu, and R. Xiong, Giant tunneling magnetoresistance in in- sulated altermagnet/ferromagnet junctions induced by spin-dependent tunneling effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 134437 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [22]

    Noh, G.-H

    S. Noh, G.-H. Kim, J. Lee, H. Jung, U. Seo, G. So, J. Lee, S. Lee, M. Park, S. Yang, Y. S. Oh, H. Jin, C. Sohn, and J.-W. Yoo, Tunneling magnetoresistance in alter- magnetic RuO 2-based magnetic tunnel junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 246703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  22. [23]

    Z. Zhou, X. Cheng, M. Hu, R. Chu, H. Bai, L. Han, J. Liu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Manipulation of the altermagnetic order in CrSb via crystal symmetry, Nature638, 645–650 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [24]

    O. J. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Za- kharov, S. C. Fromage, C. J. B. Fields, S. L. Heywood, R. B. Cousins, J. Krempask´ y, J. H. Dil, D. Kriegner, B. Kiraly, R. P. Campion, A. W. Rushforth, K. W. Edmonds, S. S. Dhesi, L. ˇSmejkal, T. Jungwirth, and P. Wadley, Nanoscale imaging and control of altermag- netism in MnTe, Nature636, 348–353 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [25]

    Y. Chen, X. Liu, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Electri- cal switching of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 016701 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [26]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. Anto- nenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, N. Gedik, S.-W. Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet, Nature642, 64–70 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [27]

    Shao, Y.-Y

    D.-F. Shao, Y.-Y. Jiang, J. Ding, S.-H. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, R.-C. Xiao, G. Gurung, W. J. Lu, Y. P. Sun, and E. Y. Tsymbal, N´ eel spin currents in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216702 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [28]

    Zhang, Z.-A

    S.-S. Zhang, Z.-A. Wang, B. Li, W.-J. Lu, M. Tian, Y.- P. Sun, H. Du, and D.-F. Shao, Deterministic switch- ing of the N´ eel vector by asymmetric spin torque, arXiv:2506.10786 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [29]

    S. Han, D. Jo, I. Baek, P. M. Oppeneer, and H.-W. Lee, Harnessing magnetic octupole Hall effect to induce torque in altermagnets, arXiv:2409.14423 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [30]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Ferroically ordered mag- netic octupoles ind-wave altermagnets, Phys. Rev. X14, 011019 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [31]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau theory of alter- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    work page 2024

  31. [32]

    X. H. Verbeek, D. Voderholzer, S. Sch¨ aren, Y. Gachnang, N. A. Spaldin, and S. Bhowal, Non-relativistic ferromag- netotriakontadipolar order and spin splitting in hematite, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043157 (2024)

    work page 2024

  32. [33]

    A. V. Khvalkovskiy, V. Cros, D. Apalkov, V. Nikitin, M. Krounbi, K. A. Zvezdin, A. Anane, J. Grollier, and A. Fert, Matching domain-wall configuration and spin-orbit torques for efficient domain-wall motion, Phys. Rev. B 87, 020402 (2013)

    work page 2013

  33. [34]

    Gambardella and I

    P. Gambardella and I. M. Miron, Current-induced 7 spin–orbit torques, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A369, 3175–3197 (2011)

    work page 2011

  34. [35]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    work page 2019

  35. [36]

    I. Baek, S. Han, and H.-W. Lee, Magnetic octupole Hall effect in heavy transition metals, arXiv:2507.02516 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [37]

    Here, we consider only the exter- nally injected contribution, since the equilibriumO i is aligned parallel to the N´ eel vector

    In general,O i consists of both equilibrium and externally injected contributions. Here, we consider only the exter- nally injected contribution, since the equilibriumO i is aligned parallel to the N´ eel vector

    work page

  37. [38]

    ˇZelezn´ y, H

    J. ˇZelezn´ y, H. Gao, K. V´ yborn´ y, J. Zemen, J. Maˇ sek, A. Manchon, J. Wunderlich, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Relativistic N´ eel-order fields induced by electrical current in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 157201 (2014)

    work page 2014

  38. [39]

    S. Yu. Bodnar, L. ˇSmejkal, I. Turek, T. Jungwirth, O. Gomonay, J. Sinova, A. A. Sapozhnik, H.-J. Elmers, M. Kl¨ aui, and M. Jourdan, Writing and reading anti- ferromagnetic Mn 2Au by N´ eel spin–orbit torques and large anisotropic magnetoresistance, Nat. Commun.9, 348 (2018)

    work page 2018

  39. [40]

    Gomonay, V

    O. Gomonay, V. P. Kravchuk, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, K. V. Yershov, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, J. van den Brink, and J. Sinova, Structure, control, and dynamics of alter- magnetic textures, npj Spintronics2, 35 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [41]

    Z. Xu, J. Ren, Z. Yuan, Y. Xin, X. Zhang, S. Shi, Y. Yang, and Z. Zhu, Field-free spin–orbit-torque switching of an antiferromagnet with perpendicular N´ eel vector, J. Appl. Phys.133, 153904 (2023)

    work page 2023

  41. [42]

    Akimoto, H

    H. Akimoto, H. Kanai, Y. Uehara, T. Ishizuka, and S. Kameyama, Analysis of thermal magnetic noise in spin- valve GMR heads by using micromagnetic simulation, J. Appl. Phys.97, 10N705 (2005)

    work page 2005

  42. [43]

    I. M. Miron, K. Garello, G. Gaudin, P.-J. Zermatten, M. V. Costache, S. Auffret, S. Bandiera, B. Rodmacq, A. Schuhl, and P. Gambardella, Perpendicular switching of a single ferromagnetic layer induced by in-plane current injection, Nature476, 189–193 (2011)

    work page 2011

  43. [44]

    Liu, C.-F

    L. Liu, C.-F. Pai, Y. Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque switching with the giant spin Hall effect of tantalum, Science336, 555–558 (2012)

    work page 2012

  44. [45]

    From 30 independent trials considering thermal fluctua- tions, the obtained average switching time is 9.66±2.27 without SOT and 1.50±0.047 with SOT, in unit of (10−2ωex)−1

    work page

  45. [46]

    Hassan, S

    N. Hassan, S. P. Lainez-Garcia, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and J. S. Friedman, Toggle Spin-Orbit Torque MRAM with perpendicular Magnetic Anisotropy, IEEE J. Exploratory Solid-State Comput. Devices Circuits 5, 166 (2019)

    work page 2019

  46. [47]

    See the Supplemental Materials

    work page

  47. [48]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz´ alez- Hern´ andez, and L.ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional magnetism in doped FeSb 2, PNAS118, e2108924118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [49]

    Schiff, P

    H. Schiff, P. McClarty, J. G. Rau, and J. Romh´ anyi, Collinear altermagnets and their Landau theories, arXiv:2412.18025 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  49. [50]

    E. G. Tveten, A. Qaiumzadeh, O. A. Tretiakov, and A. Brataas, Staggered dynamics in antiferromagnets by col- lective coordinates, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 127208 (2013)

    work page 2013

  50. [51]

    Shiino, S.-H

    T. Shiino, S.-H. Oh, P. M. Haney, S.-W. Lee, G. Go, B.- G. Park, and K.-J. Lee, Antiferromagnetic domain-wall motion driven by spin–orbit torques, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 087203 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [52]

    S.-H. C. Baek, V. P. Amin, Y.-W. Oh, G. Go, S.-J. Lee, G.-H. Lee, K.-J. Kim, M. D. Stiles, B.-G. Park, and K.-J. Lee, Spin currents and spin–orbit torques in ferromag- netic trilayers, Nat. Mater.17, 509–513 (2018)

    work page 2018

  52. [53]

    J. Ryu, R. Thompson, J. Y. Park, S.-J. Kim, G. Choi, J. Kang, H. B. Jeong, M. Kohda, J. M. Yuk, J. Nitta, K.-J. Lee, and B.-G. Park, Efficient spin–orbit torque in magnetic trilayers using all three polarizations of a spin current, Nat. Electron.5, 217–223 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [54]

    Ko and K.-J

    H.-W. Ko and K.-J. Lee, Magnetic octupole Hall effect in d-wave altermagnets, arXiv:2508.00794 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025