Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Circulation Fluctuations of Elementary Turbulent Vortices

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fast dissipation modes explain why vortex circulations are fat-tailed.

desk verdict The paper's real contribution is a closed-form fat-tailed PDF for elementary vortex circulation from a GMC split of the dissipation field; it deserves review, but the headline 'no-fit' agreement rests on the untested ℓ≈λ identification. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.13958 v1 pith:TTVRUYKC submitted 2025-08-19 physics.flu-dyn cond-mat.stat-mech

L. Moriconi , R.M. Pereira This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyncond-mat.stat-mech
keywords vortexgasmodelcirculationstatisticsGaussianmultiplicativechaosturbulenceintermittencyfat-taileddistributionstubesTaylormicroscaledirectnumericalsimulation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper addresses an apparent contradiction in the vortex gas model of turbulence: elementary vortex circulations behave like a Gaussian-correlated field at large separations, yet measurements show that individual circulations have fat-tailed, non-Gaussian distributions. The proposed resolution is to split the dissipation field into slow and fast modes at a crossover scale identified with the Taylor microscale, and to fold the fast modes into the circulation as a squared lognormal multiplier. The resulting closed-form probability density matches direct numerical simulation data across Reynolds numbers 433 to 2556 with no fitted parameters. If correct, the fat tails are not a separate feature of vortex structure but a direct consequence of the multifractal statistics of the dissipation field at sub-Taylor scales.

What carries the argument

The central object is the decomposition $\phi = \phi_< + \phi_>$ of the lognormal GMC scalar field into slow (low-wavenumber) and fast (high-wavenumber) modes, with the crossover $\ell$ taken to be the Taylor microscale. The key identity is $\bar{\Gamma} = \xi_>^2 \tilde{\Gamma}$ (Eq. 3.10 with $\beta=2$), which makes the redefined circulation a product of a lognormal fast-mode variable and a Gaussian variable. The $\beta=2$ choice follows from requiring the conditioned vortex density $\sigma \eta^2$ to equal the GMC density $\xi$ in law, using the $Z_2$ symmetry of $\phi_>$. This product structure carries the argument: the quadratic log-moments (3.25), the parameter-free closed-form PDF (3.32), and the Gauss

What would settle it

Compute the $q^2$ coefficient in $\ln \left( \frac{\langle |\Gamma|^q \rangle}{A_q} \right)$ for moments beyond $q=6$ or at a Reynolds number beyond 2556 and compare it with $\frac{\mu}{2} \ln\left(\frac{\lambda}{\eta}\right)$. The paper's prediction fixes that coefficient exactly; any statistically significant deviation would falsify the $\beta=2$ product structure and the $\ell \approx \lambda$ identification. A second check is to measure the two-point correlation of standardized elementary circulations at separations below the Taylor microscale, where the fast-mode decomposition predicts a decay governed by the $(r/\ell)^{-3/2}$ behavior of the $\phi_>$ correlator rather than a flat G

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that elementary vortex circulation should be redefined as $\bar{\Gamma}(x) = \xi_>^2(x) \tilde{\Gamma}(x)$, where $\tilde{\Gamma}$ is the original Gaussian circulation field and $\xi_>$ is the fast-mode factor of the vortex density obtained by splitting the GMC lognormal field at a crossover scale $\ell \approx \lambda$ (the Taylor microscale). With the exponent $\beta = 2$, the conditioned vortex number density equals, in law, the full GMC density, so the original vortex gas model is recovered unchanged at inertial scales. At a single point the new circulation is a lognormal variable times a Gaussian, hence non-Gaussian and fat-tailed, while for separations larger than \e

Load-bearing premise

The prediction stands or falls on the assumption that the crossover between slow and fast dissipation modes sits at the Taylor microscale ($\ell \approx \lambda$); if the true crossover sits elsewhere, the constant $c$ and the whole predicted PDF shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The closed-form PDF (3.32) becomes a parameter-free prediction once \ell = \lambda; the paper's DNS comparison shows it reproduces the measured distributions for five datasets spanning R_\lambda = 433 to 2556.
  • The vortex circulation scale \tilde{\Gamma}_0 scales as u'L / R_\lambda^2, i.e. proportionally to the kinematic viscosity, so the characteristic circulation of elementary vortices decreases sharply with Reynolds number.
  • The vortex number density inherits GMC scaling: the density autocorrelation decays as r^{-\mu/4} and coarse-grained density moments follow exponents (\mu/8)q(1-q), providing alternative measurements of the intermittency exponent.
  • The original inertial-range predictions of the vortex gas model are preserved; the fast-mode absorption modifies only the sub-Taylor-scale single-point statistics, keeping the model's earlier successes intact.
  • For moment orders beyond about q=6 the free-field approximation used in the construction is expected to break down, so the model identifies where deviations from the predicted moment parabola should appear.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending the same construction to two-point statistics would give a concrete prediction for how elementary circulations become correlated below the Taylor scale: the fast-mode factor contributes a decay set by the (r/\ell)^{-3/2} behavior of the \phi_> correlator, which could be measured directly in DNS.
  • If the crossover scale is only approximately the Taylor microscale, the same moment relation provides a way to measure the effective \ell from the q^2 coefficient, allowing a test of whether \ell = \lambda survives at Reynolds numbers beyond 2556.
  • A coarse-grained or large-eddy formulation of the model should see a renormalization between vortex density and circulation fluctuations as the filter scale changes; the \beta=2 absorption suggests that the effective elementary circulation depends on resolution even though total circulation statistics remain fixed.
  • The same algebraic structure may apply to other intermittent small-scale turbulent observables: any field built as a lognormal multiplier times a Gaussian component will show fat tails at one point while factorizing at large separations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper extends the vortex gas model (VGM) of homogeneous isotropic turbulence by replacing the Gaussian elementary circulation field \tilde{\Gamma}(x) with \bar{\Gamma}(x)=\xi_>^2(x)\tilde{\Gamma}(x), where \xi_> is the fast-mode GMC factor obtained by splitting the dissipation scalar field at a crossover scale \ell. A symmetry argument and the empirical law (3.15) select \beta=2. The resulting single-point circulation PDF, Eq. (3.32), is a lognormal-Gaussian product with variance fixed by c=(\ell/\eta)^{\mu/2}, while multi-point correlations factorize at separations large compared with \ell. The model is validated against JHU DNS data at R_\lambda=433, 610, 1278, and 2556, using moments (3.25), the PDF (3.32) with no fitted parameters, density correlations (3.33), and coarse-grained density scalings (3.35)-(3.38). The key physical input is the working hypothesis \ell\approx\lambda (Taylor microscale), stated in Sec. III(v).

Significance. If correct, this is a conceptually important result: it resolves an apparent paradox in the VGM—non-Gaussian circulation of individual vortices coexisting with Gaussian-like multi-point correlations—by tracing the non-Gaussianity to the GMC structure of the dissipation field. The paper also provides a closed-form, parameter-free prediction for the elementary circulation PDF that is tested extensively at four Reynolds numbers using public DNS data. The derivation is internally consistent given the stated assumptions, and the numerical validations cover a broad parameter range. The main limitation is that the headline 'no fitting' PDF depends on the unverified identification \ell\approx\lambda; this is a load-bearing working hypothesis rather than an independently measured or tested scale.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. III(v), Eqs. (3.20) and (3.31)] The entire shape of the predicted PDF (3.32) is fixed by the constant c=(\ell/\eta)^{\mu/2}, and the paper sets \ell\approx\lambda based only on a citation to Ishihara et al. [35] that the Taylor microscale is the typical thickness of dissipation layers. This is explicitly labeled a 'working hypothesis.' No independent measurement or sensitivity analysis is provided. Since \sigma_z^2=\mu\ln(\lambda/\eta) determines the fatness of the predicted distribution, a modest error in \ell/\lambda changes the PDF in a way that could degrade the apparent agreement in Fig. 3. This is not a mere technicality: it is the load-bearing scale choice for the central parameter-free claim.
  2. [Sec. IV, Fig. 2(a) and Eq. (3.25)] The validation of the moment relation (3.25) fixes the quadratic coefficient a priori to \ln c, i.e., to the value implied by \ell\approx\lambda. This prevents the DNS data from independently testing the most distinctive prediction of the model. The authors should report unconstrained quadratic fits of ln(<|\bar{\Gamma}|^q>/A_q) versus q for each R_\lambda, with confidence intervals for the q^2 coefficient, and compare these with \mu/2 \ln(\lambda/\eta). Such a test would either confirm the working hypothesis or reveal its limitations. Without it, the 'no fitting' agreement in Fig. 3 remains conditional on an untested input.
  3. [Sec. III, Eqs. (3.15)-(3.16)] The selection \beta=2 uses the empirical equality \sigma(x|\epsilon)\eta^2 \stackrel{d}{=} \xi(x), which is taken from the authors' earlier DNS study [20]. The present paper then validates the model on DNS data that include the same type of data (and very likely overlapping R_\lambda=433 dataset). This is not a fit of Eq. (3.32), but it is a model-selection step informed by the validation dataset. The authors should clarify the degree of overlap and, if possible, provide an independent check of \beta=2—for example, comparing measured conditional densities with \xi_0\xi_<\xi_>^{1-\beta} for \beta=2 against \beta=0 or other values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (3.23)] The notation 'c q2' should be typeset as c^{q^2}; similarly, the exponent in Eq. (3.26) is c^{q^2/2}. Please correct the typography to avoid confusion.
  2. [Sec. IV, Fig. 3] The excellent visual agreement in Fig. 3 is stated qualitatively. Please provide a quantitative measure (e.g., Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistic, mean squared log error, or chi-square per degree of freedom) and state the number of vortex samples used at each Reynolds number.
  3. [Sec. IV, Fig. 4] The predicted exponent -\mu/4 is about -0.0425, which is very small. The 'reasonable scaling range' over intermediate scales should be supported by a fit with confidence intervals and by stating the range of r/\eta used; otherwise the agreement is hard to assess visually.
  4. [Sec. IV, vortex detection] The analysis depends on the swirling-strength threshold (|Im(\lambda)|>\sigma_\lambda/8) and, for densities, on the KDE bandwidth (8\eta). Please state whether the circulation PDF and the reported scalings are robust to reasonable variations of these choices, and reference the earlier papers where the threshold was calibrated.
  5. [Eq. (3.22)] The asymptotic evaluation leading to the power-law tail of the \phi_> correlator is sketched; a few more steps or a reference would help the reader verify the sign and the prefactors, especially since Eq. (3.22) is used to justify the Gaussian factorization property.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the vortex-circulation PDF is derived and validated without fitting; the ℓ≈λ working hypothesis is an explicit, testable assumption rather than a circular input.

full rationale

The paper's central new result is Eq. (3.32), a closed-form PDF for the normalized elementary vortex circulation. The derivation is self-contained given the GMC setup: Γ⋆ = X·Y with X lognormal (σ_z² = μ ln(ℓ/η)) and Y Gaussian, producing the integral in (3.32). No parameter of the PDF is fitted to the circulation data used in Fig. 3: μ is taken from Ref. [40], ℓ is set to the Taylor microscale λ as an explicitly stated working hypothesis (Sec. III(v)), and λ/η is computed from DNS. The step selecting β=2 uses the empirical identity (3.15) from the authors' prior DNS study [20] and the Z₂ symmetry; although this is a self-citation, it is an externally checkable DNS observation about a different observable (vortex density vs. dissipation), not an unverified theorem, and the subsequent PDF validation is a genuinely new, independent test. The only notable weakness is the ℓ≈λ assumption, which fixes the q² coefficient in (3.25) and the width σ_z in (3.31); if the true GMC mode-split scale differed from λ, the predicted PDF would shift. However, choosing a scale by physical argument and then testing the resulting parameter-free curve is not circular: the scale is not inferred from the PDF data. Figures 2 and 4–6 similarly test derived scalings; where a prefactor is fitted (Fig. 5), the scaling exponent is still predicted. Hence no step reduces by construction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entity; the fast-mode factor xi_>^2 is a mathematical decomposition of the existing GMC field. The main fitted quantity is Gamma_tilde_0, which does not affect the central PDF. The most consequential modeling input is the working hypothesis ell = lambda, which fixes the shape of the predicted distribution.

free parameters (3)
  • Gamma_tilde_0 (typical elementary circulation scale) = Fitted per dataset via the linear coefficient in Eq. (3.25); values inferred from Fig. 2(a).
    This is the only free parameter in the moment relation (3.25). It is fitted to DNS data and then used to test the Re_lambda^{-2} scaling (4.1). It does not enter the central PDF (3.32).
  • KDE bandwidth = 8 eta
    Chosen by hand as the typical vortex diameter for estimating the vortex density field in Figs. 4-6. The authors note that smaller or larger bandwidths worsen or shorten the scaling range, so the choice is tuned to the validation.
  • Vortex detection threshold = |Im(lambda)| > sigma_lambda / 8
    Imported from ref. [20]; this threshold defines which connected regions count as vortices and therefore affects all downstream circulation and density statistics.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The vortex gas model assumptions: circulation is approximated by the flux of thin vortex tubes crossing the contour, and the probability of finding a vortex tube depends on the local dissipation rate.
    Sec. II, assumptions (i) and (ii), foundational for the whole model.
  • domain assumption The fields xi(x) and Gamma_tilde(x) are independent.
    Sec. II: 'The two-dimensional random fields xi(x) and Gamma_tilde(x) are taken to be completely independent.'
  • domain assumption Elementary circulation Gamma_tilde is a Gaussian random field with power-law spectrum |k|^{alpha-2} and alpha = 2 - mu/4 - zeta_2.
    Eqs. (2.5) and (2.12); the Gaussianity of the elementary circulation is the very property being refined.
  • domain assumption The free scalar field approximation for phi(x) is adequate for circulation moments up to about q = 6.
    Sec. II, note after Eq. (2.13): larger fluctuations are suppressed and the free-field approximation is only good for moments of order q approximately 6.
  • domain assumption The empirical law sigma(x|epsilon) eta^2 has the same probability law as xi(x), taken from the authors' prior DNS study.
    Eq. (3.15) is used to determine beta = 2 via the Z2 symmetry argument in Eqs. (3.15)-(3.16). This is a self-cited numerical input from ref. [20].
  • ad hoc to paper The crossover scale ell between fast and slow modes is approximately the Taylor microscale lambda.
    Sec. III(v): 'We set, therefore, as a working hypothesis, that ell is approximately lambda.' This fixes c = (lambda/eta)^(mu/2) and hence the predicted PDF and moment curvature.
  • standard math Standard Gaussian multiplicative chaos theory for log-correlated Gaussian fields, including source functional formulas.
    Used to compute Eqs. (3.19) and (3.35) from the free scalar field correlator. This is background mathematical technology from ref. [36].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Circulation Fluctuations of Elementary Turbulent Vortices." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TTVRUYKC

@misc{pith2026250813958,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Circulation Fluctuations of Elementary Turbulent Vortices},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TTVRUYKC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.13958}
}
read the original abstract

Thin vortex tubes, with core sizes within the dissipation range, profuse in a homogeneous and isotropic turbulent flow. Their intersections with an arbitrary plane define, as a mathematical construct, a dilute gas of localized, intermittently distributed, two-dimensional vortex spots. While their planar density fluctuations are described by a field-theoretical extension of log-normal single-point statistics, known as Gaussian multiplicative chaos (GMC), they carry circulations which are Gaussian-correlated throughout the inertial range. It is puzzling, then, to find that the circulations of individual vortices are fat-tailed distributed, an apparent paradox that we fix within the GMC framework. The solution, validated through the examination of direct numerical simulation data for a broad range of Reynolds numbers, unveils, as a surprising phenomenological result, an existing coupling between the circulation of vortex structures and the short-distance properties of their spatial distribution fluctuations at sub-Taylor microscales.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.13958 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: The granular pattern of dark spots in the left image represents cross-sections of vortex tubes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: (a) Statistical moments of individual vortex circulations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Probability distribution function of the normalized circulation of individual vortices. Sym [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Autocorrelation function of the numerically estimated vortex number density, compared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Statistical moments of the coarse-grained vortex density as a function of the coarse-graining [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: (a) Log-mean and (b) log-variance of the coarse grained vortex density (normalized ac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Optimal Surfaces for Turbulent Circulation Statistics

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A vortex gas model with log-correlated vortex densities predicts that turbulent circulation statistics are governed by the minimal surface bounded by the contour, matching DNS for nonplanar loops.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [20]

    Moriconi e R.M

    L. Moriconi e R.M. Pereira, Phys. Rev. E106, 054121 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [35]

    Ishihara, Y

    T. Ishihara, Y. Kaneda, and J.C.R. Hunt, Flow Turbul. Combust.91, 895 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [1]

    Reynolds, Philos

    O. Reynolds, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London A186, 123 (1894)

    work page

  4. [2]

    Curie, Ann.Chem.Phys.5, 289 (1895)

    P. Curie, Ann.Chem.Phys.5, 289 (1895)

    work page

  5. [3]

    Weiss, J

    P. Weiss, J. Phys.6, 661 (1907)

    work page 1907

  6. [4]

    Taylor, Proc

    G.I. Taylor, Proc. London Math. Soc.20, 196 (1921)

    work page 1921

  7. [5]

    Taylor, Proc

    G.I. Taylor, Proc. R. Soc. London A15, 421 (1935)

    work page 1935

  8. [6]

    Richardson, Proc

    L.F. Richardson, Proc. R. Soc. London A110, 709 (1926)

    work page 1926

Show all 47 references
  1. [7]

    L´ evy,Th´ eorie de l’Addition des Variables Al´ eatoires, Gauthier-Villars (1937)

    P. L´ evy,Th´ eorie de l’Addition des Variables Al´ eatoires, Gauthier-Villars (1937)

    1937

  2. [8]

    Mandelbrot,The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.H

    B. Mandelbrot,The Fractal Geometry of Nature, W.H. Freeman (1982)

    1982

  3. [9]

    Wiener, Proc

    N. Wiener, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.7, 253 (1921)

    1921

  4. [10]

    Kac, Bull

    M. Kac, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc.72, 52 (1966). 19

    1966

  5. [11]

    Kolmogorov, Dokl

    A.N. Kolmogorov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR30, 301 (1941); Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A434, 9 (1991)

    1941

  6. [12]

    Obukhov, J

    A.M. Obukhov, J. Fluid Mech.13, 77 (1962)

    1962

  7. [13]

    Kolmogorov, J

    A.N. Kolmogorov, J. Fluid Mech.13, 82 (1962)

    1962

  8. [14]

    Smagorinsky, Mon

    J. Smagorinsky, Mon. Weather Rev.91, 99 (1963)

    1963

  9. [15]

    Kadanoff, Phys

    L.P. Kadanoff, Phys. Phys. Fiz.2, 263 (1966)

    1966

  10. [16]

    Sreenivasan and J

    K.R. Sreenivasan and J. Schumacher, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.16, 121 (2025)

    2025

  11. [17]

    Apolin´ ario, L

    G.B. Apolin´ ario, L. Moriconi, R.M. Pereira e V.J. Valad˜ ao, Phys. Rev. E102, 041102(R) (2020)

    2020

  12. [18]

    Moriconi, Phys

    L. Moriconi, Phys. Rev. E103, 062137 (2021)

    2021

  13. [19]

    Moriconi, R.M

    L. Moriconi, R.M. Pereira e V.J. Valad˜ ao, Phys. Rev. E106, L023101 (2022)

    2022

  14. [21]

    Moriconi, R.M

    L. Moriconi, R.M. Pereira e V.J. Valad˜ ao, Phys. Rev. E109, 045106 (2024)

    2024

  15. [22]

    Iyer and L

    K.P. Iyer and L. Moriconi, Phys. Fluids36, 085139 (2024)

    2024

  16. [23]

    Z.-S. She, E. Jackson e S.A. Orszag, Nature344, 226 (1990)

    1990

  17. [24]

    Farge, G

    M. Farge, G. Pellegrino e K. Schneider, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 054501 (2001)

    2001

  18. [25]

    Yokokawa, K

    M. Yokokawa, K. Itakura, A. Uno, T. Ishihara e Y. Kaneda, Phys. Fluids15, L21 (2003)

    2003

  19. [26]

    Ishihara, T

    T. Ishihara, T. Gotoh e Y. Kaneda, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech.41, 165 (2009)

    2009

  20. [27]

    B¨ urger, M

    K. B¨ urger, M. Treib, R. Westermann, S. Werner, C.C. Lalescu, A. Szalay, C. Meneveau, G.L. Eyink,Vortices within vortices: hierarchical nature of vortex tubes in turbulence,arxiv.org/ abs/1210.3325(2012)

    2012 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Ghira, G.E

    A.A. Ghira, G.E. Elsinga, and C.B. da Silva, Phys. Rev. Fluids7, 104605 (2022)

    2022

  22. [29]

    Migdal, Phys

    A.A. Migdal, Phys. Rep.102, 199 (1983)

    1983

  23. [30]

    Migdal, Int

    A.A. Migdal, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A9, 1197 (1994)

    1994

  24. [31]

    N. Cao, S. Chen, and K.R. Sreenivasan, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 616 (1996)

    1996

  25. [32]

    Iyer, K.R

    K.P. Iyer, K.R. Sreenivasan e P.K. Yeung, Phys. Rev. X9, 041006 (2019)

    2019

  26. [33]

    Iyer, S.S

    K.P. Iyer, S.S. Bharadwaj e K.R. Sreenivasan, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2114679118 (2021)

    2021

  27. [34]

    Moriconi, Proc

    L. Moriconi, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.118, e2117968118 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Rhodes and V

    R. Rhodes and V. Vargas, Probab. Surv.11, 315 (2014). 20

    2014

  29. [37]

    Kholmyansky, L

    M. Kholmyansky, L. Moriconi, and A. Tsinober, Phys. Rev. E76, 026307 (2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    Y. Li, E. Perlman, M. Wan, Y. Yang, R. Burns, C. Meneveau, R. Burns, S. Chen, A. Szalay e G. Eyink, J. Turbul.9N31 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    Zhou, R.J

    J. Zhou, R.J. Adrian, S. Balachandar, and T.M. Kendall, J. Fluid Mech.387, 353 (1999)

    1999

  32. [40]

    Tang, R.A

    S.L. Tang, R.A. Antonia, L. Djenidi e Y. Zhou, J. Fluid Mech.891, A26 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    Frisch,Turbulence, Cambridge University Press (1995)

    U. Frisch,Turbulence, Cambridge University Press (1995)

    1995

  34. [42]

    Yeung, D.A

    P.K. Yeung, D.A. Donzis, and K.R. Sreenivasan, J. Fluid Mech.700, 5 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Yeung, X.M

    P.K. Yeung, X.M. Zhai, and K.R. Sreenivasan, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.112, 12633 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Yeung, K.R

    P.K. Yeung, K.R. Sreenivasan, and S.B. Pope, Phys. Rev. Fluids3, 064603 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    Yeung, K

    P.K. Yeung, K. Ravikumar, S. Nichols, and R. Uma-Vaideswaran, Comput. Phys. Commun. 306, 109364 (2025). [46]https://turbulence.idies.jhu.edu/home

    2025

  38. [47]

    Okabe, B

    A. Okabe, B. Boots, K. Sugihara, and S.N. Chiu,Spatial Tessellations: Concepts and Appli- cations of Voronoi Diagrams(2 ed.), Wiley, (2000). 21

    2000

  39. [2556]

    Gaussian puzzle

    ForR λ = 610, two different simulations are analyzed: one in which the truncation wavenumberk max obeysk maxη≈2.67, and a higher resolution one, in whichk maxη≈5.34 (hereafter identified as “h.r.”). Following previous studies on the VGM [19–21], individual vortices are detecte...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.