Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Universal Fluctuations in the Tail Probability for d=2 Random Walks in Space-Time Random Environments

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two-dimensional random-walk extremes get their own universal law

desk verdict The manuscript is an unrelated quantum federated learning survey with an RWRE abstract bolted on; there is no derivable physics content to referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.15999 v1 pith:IJDNYAND submitted 2025-08-21 cond-mat.stat-mech

Franscesca Ark , Jacob B. Hass , Eric I. Corwin This is my paper
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords randomwalksinenvironmentstailprobabilityuniversalityKPZclassextreme-valuestatisticsd=2fluctuationscriticalscaling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that in two spatial dimensions, the probability of very large walker displacements in random-walk-in-random-environment models follows a universal scaling form that is different from the one-dimensional Kardar-Parisi-Zhang form, yet is governed by the same coefficient, λ_ext. It further claims that fluctuations of this tail probability exhibit a critical scaling regime when the displacement grows linearly with time. The stated result rests almost entirely on the abstract: the body text attached to the submission is a different manuscript on quantum federated learning and contains no equations, model definitions, or simulation evidence for the RWRE claim.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the tail probability of the walker displacement and the coefficient λ_ext, which the paper treats as a dimension-independent descriptor of extreme-event decay. The argument is carried by the expected universality of extremes in correlated random-walk systems, with the d=1 KPZ behavior serving as the baseline against which the d=2 form is compared.

What would settle it

A direct check: once the model is specified, simulate the d=2 RWRE, estimate the tail exponent and λ_ext from finite-time data, and test whether the scaling curve differs from d=1 while sharing λ_ext; additionally, test whether the fluctuation window at x = vt collapses with the predicted critical scaling form.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper asserts that for discrete-lattice random walks in random environments in d=2, the tail probability of extreme walker positions displays a universal scaling form distinct from the d=1 case, while sharing the same characteristic coefficient λ_ext. The abstract also reports a critical scaling regime for fluctuations in the tail probability at positions that scale linearly in time. In its accessible form, the paper offers no derivation, no explicit model, and no data supporting this claim.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that λ_ext is a well-defined, dimension-transferable coefficient measured the same way in d=1 and d=2; the submission never states the lattice model, disorder distribution, or estimator, so the claimed universality could be an artifact of fitting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If correct, d=2 RWRE extremes belong to a universality class distinct from the d=1 KPZ class, meaning the extreme statistics cannot be inherited by simply adding a dimension.
  • The claim that the same λ_ext appears in d=1 and d=2 would give a concrete quantitative link between the two dimensions, potentially allowing d=1 measurements to predict d=2 decay rates.
  • The critical scaling regime at positions linear in time would imply that fluctuations in the tail are governed by a separate scale, not captured by the leading large-deviation form.
  • If established, the result would extend the study of correlated diffusive systems by identifying which features of extreme statistics are dimension-dependent and which are universal.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to simulate several d=2 lattice models with different disorder distributions and check whether the collapse curve and λ_ext remain unchanged; if λ_ext is merely a fitted constant transferred from d=1, the claimed universality would reduce to a coincidence.
  • If λ_ext truly survives across the d=1 and d=2 scaling forms, it may serve as a robust probe for extreme-event statistics in other disordered systems, but this inference goes beyond what the paper demonstrates.
  • The mismatch between the abstract and the attached full text means that, as submitted, the central claim has no visible evidentiary base; the model, estimator, and numerical protocol would need to be supplied before the claim can be evaluated.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission, arXiv:2508.15999, presents an abstract claiming a new universal scaling form for the tail probability of d=2 discrete-lattice random walks in random environments (RWRE), with the same extremal coefficient lambda_ext as in d=1 and a critical scaling regime for fluctuations at positions scaling linearly in time. The full text, however, is an IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials survey titled "Quantum Federated Learning: A Comprehensive Survey," with running header arXiv:2508.15998v1. The body contains no RWRE model, no definition of the environment or walk rule, no derivation of the tail probability, no simulation protocol, no data, and no equation defining lambda_ext. The central claim of the abstract is therefore unsupported by any in-scope evidence in the manuscript.

Significance. If the abstract's claim were established, it could be a significant contribution to the statistical mechanics of random walks in random environments: a dimension-dependent universal tail scaling with a shared extremal coefficient would be a nontrivial extension of the d=1 KPZ-type results. The claimed fluctuation-driven critical window at positions x ~ t is also a concrete, falsifiable statement. However, the manuscript as submitted provides none of the supporting mathematics, numerics, or model specification needed to evaluate or use these claims. There is no machine-checked proof, reproducible code, or parameter-free derivation to credit; conversely, the only identifiable technical content in the body is an unrelated survey that does not bear on the abstract's assertions.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract vs. Full Text (entire body)] The central claim—that d=2 RWRE tail probabilities display a new universal scaling form characterized by the same lambda_ext as d=1, with a critical scaling regime at positions x ~ t—appears only in the abstract. The full text is a survey on quantum federated learning (IEEE COMST style, arXiv running header 2508.15998), containing no specification of a discrete-lattice RWRE model, no disorder distribution, no walk rule, no definition of the tail probability, and no equations for the scaling form. A referee cannot audit or test a claim when all load-bearing definitions and derivations are absent.
  2. [Abstract, sentence 4 (lambda_ext)] The phrase "characterized by the same coefficient, lambda_ext, as in the d=1 case" is operationally undefined. No equation, estimator, or reference defines lambda_ext, and no argument establishes that the same coefficient controls both d=1 and d=2 tail probabilities. As stated, the comparison could reduce to a coincidence of names rather than a derived universal constant. This is a load-bearing gap because the claimed universality rests on the transferability of lambda_ext between dimensions.
  3. [Abstract, sentence 5 (critical scaling regime)] The observation of a "critical scaling regime for fluctuations in the tail probability at positions that scale linearly in time" is asserted without any simulation protocol, scaling collapse, error bars, or theoretical calculation. There is no table or figure in the manuscript reporting such data. This is not a matter of interpretation; the evidence required to support the claim is entirely missing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [General formatting/metadata] The arXiv identifier in the running header (2508.15998) differs from the submission identifier (2508.15999), and the title and abstract do not match the body. The authors should ensure the manuscript file, title, abstract, and references correspond to a single coherent submission.
  2. [References] The reference list contains only quantum-federated-learning and quantum-computing sources. There are no references to RWRE, KPZ universality, extremal statistics, or related statistical-mechanics literature. Even a corrected submission would need a proper literature context for the d=1 RWRE results and the d=2 extension.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity identified: there is no derivation chain to audit; the RWRE claims are confined to the abstract and the body is an unrelated QFL survey.

full rationale

The manuscript's stated result—d=2 RWRE tail probabilities with the same lambda_ext as d=1 and a critical scaling regime at positions scaling linearly in time—appears only in the abstract. The full text is a Quantum Federated Learning survey (arXiv:2508.15998) containing no RWRE model, no disorder distribution, no walk rule, no estimator for lambda_ext, and no equations, simulations, or data on tail probabilities. Because the claimed derivation chain is absent, there is no equation or fitted parameter whose output can be shown to equal its input by construction, and no load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem. The concern that lambda_ext might be carried over from a d=1 fit and then asserted in d=2 is a plausible suspicion, but without any textual definition, estimator, or equation it cannot be exhibited as a specific reduction, as required by the circularity standard. Absence of in-scope support is a serious correctness and verifiability problem, but it is not circularity. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The submission as given contains only the abstract for the RWRE claim; the full text is an unrelated survey. The only identifiable ledger entry is the empirical coefficient λ_ext, whose provenance (fitted vs. derived) is unverifiable. The listed axioms are explicit domain assumptions the abstract leans on. No invented entities (particles, forces, dimensions) are claimed.

free parameters (1)
  • λ_ext (d=1 extremal coefficient) = not stated in the provided text
    The abstract asserts that d=2 shares 'the same coefficient, λ_ext, as in the d=1 case' but gives no definition, equation, or citation. Whether this is an analytic constant or a fitted parameter from d=1 data is unverifiable from the submission; the central claim depends on it.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption d=1 RWRE extreme statistics are in the KPZ universality class with a well-defined coefficient λ_ext
    Invoked in the abstract ('In spatial dimension d=1 RWRE models have been well studied numerically and analytically and exhibit universal behavior in the KPZ universality class'), with no citation in the provided text.
  • domain assumption Correlated walkers in a shared environment are faithfully captured by discrete-lattice RWRE models
    Framing assumption of the abstract's first sentences; the specific lattice model, disorder distribution, and dynamics are never stated in the body.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal Fluctuations in the Tail Probability for d=2 Random Walks in Space-Time Random Environments." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IJDNYAND

@misc{pith2026250815999,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal Fluctuations in the Tail Probability for d=2 Random Walks in Space-Time Random Environments},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IJDNYAND}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.15999}
}
abstract

Many diffusive systems involve correlated random walkers due to a shared environment. Such systems can be modeled as random walks in random environments (RWRE). These models differ from classical diffusion in the behavior of the extremes -- the walkers that move the fastest or farthest. In spatial dimension $d=1$ RWRE models have been well studied numerically and analytically and exhibit universal behavior in the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang universality class. Here, we study discrete lattice RWRE models in $d=2$. We find that the tail probability exhibits a different universal scaling form, which is nevertheless characterized by the same coefficient, $\lambda_\mathrm{ext}$, as in the $d=1$ case. We observe a critical scaling regime for fluctuations in the tail probability at positions that scale linearly in time.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Random walks in Dirichlet random environment in dimension $d+1$

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    For random walks in a Dirichlet random environment, rare-trajectory fluctuations match KPZ exponents in d=1,2, and in d=3 an exact second-moment calculation bounds the disorder transition at v_c ≥ 0.639.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

186 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    It supports simulation through Qiskit Aer and real hardware access via IBM Quantum cloud

    Quantum Programming Frameworks: • Qiskit (IBM): Qiskit is an open-source software develop- ment kit (SDK) developed by IBM for building, simu- lating, and executing quantum circuits [136]. It supports simulation through Qiskit Aer and real hardware access via IBM Quantum cloud. It’s widely used for prototyping quantum machine learning and QFL models due t...

  2. [2]

    These irregularities can point to things like fraud, equipment faults, or cybersecurity attacks illustrate in Fig

    Overview: Detecting unusual patterns is essential for keeping today’s smart systems secure and running smoothly. These irregularities can point to things like fraud, equipment faults, or cybersecurity attacks illustrate in Fig. 8. For the traditional approach, there are three main types of anomaly detection techniques—reconstruction-based (RE) [156]–[158]...

  3. [3]

    A false detection occurs when something normal, such as a regular image of a dog, is incorrectly iden- tified as an anomaly (it is not a dog)

    Proposed Method: Our approach to anomaly detection addresses two common problems: false and missed detections, as discussed in [165]. A false detection occurs when something normal, such as a regular image of a dog, is incorrectly iden- tified as an anomaly (it is not a dog). This frequently occurs because each client (device or system) has different type...

  4. [4]

    This dataset contains a diverse but uniformly labeled collection of images across ten classes

    Illustrative Results: To evaluate the performance of our QFL-based approach, to represent normal data, we use the baseline dataset CIFAR-10 [169]. This dataset contains a diverse but uniformly labeled collection of images across ten classes. For anomaly data, we use CIFAR-100 [169] and Tiny-ImageNet [170]. CIFAR-100, with its 100 classes, offers greater d...

  5. [6]

    Transitioning from federated learning to quantum federated learning in internet of things: A com- prehensive survey,

    C. Qiao, M. Li, Y . Liu, and Z. Tian, “Transitioning from federated learning to quantum federated learning in internet of things: A com- prehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , 2024

    2024

  6. [7]

    Comprehensive Survey of QML: From Data Analysis to Algorithmic Advancements

    S. Tomar, R. Tripathi, and S. Kumar, “Comprehensive survey of qml: From data analysis to algorithmic advancements,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.09528, 2025

    work page Pith review arXiv 2025

  7. [8]

    Decentralized Quantum Federated Learning for Metaverse: Analysis, Design and Implementation

    D. Gurung, S. R. Pokhrel, and G. Li, “Decentralized quantum federated learning for metaverse: Analysis, design and implementation,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.11297, 2023

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  8. [9]

    Toward quantum federated learning,

    C. Ren, R. Yan, H. Zhu, H. Yu, M. Xu, Y . Shen, Y . Xu, M. Xiao, Z. Y . Dong, M. Skoglund, et al., “Toward quantum federated learning,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 2025

    2025

Show all 186 references
  1. [10]

    Towards quantum federated learning,

    C. Ren, R. Yan, H. Zhu, H. Yu, M. Xu, Y . Shen, Y . Xu, M. Xiao, Z. Y . Dong, M. Skoglund,et al., “Towards quantum federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09912 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  2. [11]

    Quantum internet: Networking challenges in dis- tributed quantum computing,

    A. S. Cacciapuoti, M. Caleffi, F. Tafuri, F. S. Cataliotti, S. Gherardini, and G. Bianchi, “Quantum internet: Networking challenges in dis- tributed quantum computing,” IEEE Network, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 137– 143, 2019

    2019

  3. [12]

    A survey of important issues in quantum computing and communications,

    Z. Yang, M. Zolanvari, and R. Jain, “A survey of important issues in quantum computing and communications,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1059–1094, 2023

    2023

  4. [13]

    Quantum-empowered federated learning and 6g wireless networks for iot security: Concept, challenges and future directions,

    D. Javeed, M. S. Saeed, I. Ahmad, M. Adil, P. Kumar, and A. N. Islam, “Quantum-empowered federated learning and 6g wireless networks for iot security: Concept, challenges and future directions,” Future Generation Computer Systems , 2024

    2024

  5. [14]

    Foundations of quantum federated learning over classical and quantum networks,

    M. Chehimi, S. Y .-C. Chen, W. Saad, D. Towsley, and M. Debbah, “Foundations of quantum federated learning over classical and quantum networks,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 124–130, 2023

    2023

  6. [15]

    Quantum- empowered federated learning in space-air-ground integrated net- works,

    T. Wang, P. Li, Y . Wu, L. Qian, Z. Su, and R. Lu, “Quantum- empowered federated learning in space-air-ground integrated net- works,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 96–103, 2023

    2023

  7. [16]

    Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey,

    D. C. Nguyen, M. Ding, P. N. Pathirana, A. Seneviratne, J. Li, and H. V . Poor, “Federated learning for internet of things: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1622–1658, 2021

    2021

  8. [17]

    A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection,

    Q. Li, Z. Wen, Z. Wu, S. Hu, N. Wang, Y . Li, X. Liu, and B. He, “A survey on federated learning systems: Vision, hype and reality for data privacy and protection,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 3347–3366, 2021

    2021

  9. [18]

    A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond,

    S. AbdulRahman, H. Tout, H. Ould-Slimane, A. Mourad, C. Talhi, and M. Guizani, “A survey on federated learning: The journey from centralized to distributed on-site learning and beyond,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , vol. 8, no. 7, pp. 5476–5497, 2020

    2020

  10. [19]

    Quantum federated learning: a comprehensive literature review of foundations, challenges, and future directions,

    R. Ballester, J. Cerquides, and L. Artiles, “Quantum federated learning: a comprehensive literature review of foundations, challenges, and future directions,” Quantum Machine Intelligence , vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–29, 2025

    2025

  11. [20]

    Quantum federated learning: Progress, challenges, and opportunities,

    S. Saha, A. K. Chattopadhyay, and A. Nag, “Quantum federated learning: Progress, challenges, and opportunities,” in International Conference on Information Systems Security , pp. 23–35, Springer, 2024

    2024

  12. [21]

    Management of resource at the network edge for federated learning,

    S. Trindade, L. F. Bittencourt, and N. L. da Fonseca, “Management of resource at the network edge for federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.03428, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Reputation-aware federated learning client selection based on stochas- tic integer programming,

    X. Tan, W. C. Ng, W. Y . B. Lim, Z. Xiong, D. Niyato, and H. Yu, “Reputation-aware federated learning client selection based on stochas- tic integer programming,” IEEE Transactions on Big Data , vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 953–964, 2022

    2022

  14. [23]

    Review of qubit-based quantum sensing,

    P. S. Patel and D. B. Desai, “Review of qubit-based quantum sensing,” Quantum Information Processing , vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1–37, 2025

    2025

  15. [24]

    Quantum measurement for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer,

    S. Patel, P. Jayakumar, T.-C. Yen, and A. F. Izmaylov, “Quantum measurement for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.14968, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Current fluctuations in open quantum systems: Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics,

    G. T. Landi, M. J. Kewming, M. T. Mitchison, and P. P. Potts, “Current fluctuations in open quantum systems: Bridging the gap between quantum continuous measurements and full counting statistics,” PRX Quantum, vol. 5, no. 2, p. 020201, 2024

    2024

  17. [26]

    Advances and open challenges in federated foundation models,

    C. Ren, H. Yu, H. Peng, X. Tang, B. Zhao, L. Yi, A. Z. Tan, Y . Gao, A. Li, X. Li, et al. , “Advances and open challenges in federated foundation models,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2025

    2025

  18. [27]

    Advances in quantum cryptography,

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani, et al. , “Advances in quantum cryptography,” Advances in optics and photon- ics, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1012–1236, 2020

    2020

  19. [28]

    Quantum computing market - global forecast to 2027,

    MarketsandMarkets, “Quantum computing market - global forecast to 2027,” 2025. Accessed: April 2025

    2027

  20. [29]

    Quantum computing market size, share & covid-19 impact analysis,

    F. B. Insights, “Quantum computing market size, share & covid-19 impact analysis,” 2025. Accessed: April 2025

    2025

  21. [30]

    Quantum computing to create up to $850 billion of economic value by 2040,

    B. C. Group, “Quantum computing to create up to $850 billion of economic value by 2040,” 2024. Accessed: April 2025

  22. [31]

    Federated learning market,

    Market.us, “Federated learning market,” 2024. Accessed: April 2025

    2024

  23. [32]

    Federated learning market report,

    G. V . Research, “Federated learning market report,” 2023. Accessed: April 2025

    2023

  24. [33]

    Federated learning market,

    S. Insider, “Federated learning market,” 2024. Accessed: April 2025

    2024

  25. [34]

    Director sap labs explains qualifications culture quantum computing field,

    B. Insider, “Director sap labs explains qualifications culture quantum computing field,” 2025. Accessed: April 2025

    2025

  26. [35]

    Application of quantum computing in reliability analysis,

    M. Yazdi, “Application of quantum computing in reliability analysis,” in Advances in Computational Mathematics for Industrial System Reliability and Maintainability , pp. 139–154, Springer, 2024

    2024

  27. [36]

    Advancements in quantum algorithms for solving complex optimization problems,

    E. Adediran, I. Fatoki, and T. Ogunyinka, “Advancements in quantum algorithms for solving complex optimization problems,” Available at SSRN 5015789, 2024

    2024

  28. [37]

    A survey on quantum machine learning: Current trends, challenges, opportunities, and the road ahead,

    K. Zaman, A. Marchisio, M. A. Hanif, and M. Shafique, “A survey on quantum machine learning: Current trends, challenges, opportunities, and the road ahead,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.10315 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Entanglement-assisted quantum networks: Mechanics, enabling technologies, challenges, and research directions,

    Z. Li, K. Xue, J. Li, L. Chen, R. Li, Z. Wang, N. Yu, D. S. Wei, Q. Sun, and J. Lu, “Entanglement-assisted quantum networks: Mechanics, enabling technologies, challenges, and research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 2133– 2189, 2023

    2023

  30. [39]

    Privacy- preserving data-driven learning models for emerging communication networks: A comprehensive survey,

    M. M. Fouda, Z. M. Fadlullah, M. I. Ibrahem, and N. Kato, “Privacy- preserving data-driven learning models for emerging communication networks: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2024

    2024

  31. [40]

    Quantum network engineering in the nisq age: Principles, missions, and challenges,

    U. Khalid, J. U. Rehman, S. N. Paing, H. Jung, T. Q. Duong, and H. Shin, “Quantum network engineering in the nisq age: Principles, missions, and challenges,” IEEE Network, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 112–123, 2023

    2023

  32. [41]

    A new alliance of machine learning and quantum comput- ing: Concepts, attacks, and challenges in iot networks,

    V . Rishiwal, U. Agarwal, M. Yadav, S. Tanwar, D. Garg, and M. Guizani, “A new alliance of machine learning and quantum comput- ing: Concepts, attacks, and challenges in iot networks,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2025

    2025

  33. [42]

    Privacy-preserving intelligent resource allocation for federated edge learning in quantum internet,

    M. Xu, D. Niyato, Z. Yang, Z. Xiong, J. Kang, D. I. Kim, and X. Shen, “Privacy-preserving intelligent resource allocation for federated edge learning in quantum internet,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 142–157, 2022

    2022

  34. [43]

    Quantum intelligence in beyond 5g networks: Current progress, and open avenues,

    B.-G. Kang and Y . Nam, “Quantum intelligence in beyond 5g networks: Current progress, and open avenues,” Sustainable Machine Intelligence Journal, vol. 7, pp. 4–1, 2024

    2024

  35. [44]

    State of the art in parallel and distributed systems: Emerging trends and challenges,

    F. Dai, M. A. Hossain, and Y . Wang, “State of the art in parallel and distributed systems: Emerging trends and challenges,” Electronics, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 677, 2025

    2025

  36. [45]

    Nac-qfl: Noise aware clustered quantum federated learning,

    H. Sahu and H. P. Gupta, “Nac-qfl: Noise aware clustered quantum federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.14236 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Sporadic federated learning approach in quantum environment to tackle quantum noise,

    R. Rahman, A. Pokharel, and D. C. Nguyen, “Sporadic federated learning approach in quantum environment to tackle quantum noise,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Con- ference, pp. 1829–1838, 2025

    2025

  38. [47]

    Quantum convolutional neural net- work for classical data classification,

    T. Hur, L. Kim, and D. K. Park, “Quantum convolutional neural net- work for classical data classification,” Quantum Machine Intelligence , vol. 4, no. 1, p. 3, 2022

    2022

  39. [48]

    Beyond bits: A review of quantum embedding techniques for efficient information processing,

    M. A. Khan, M. N. Aman, and B. Sikdar, “Beyond bits: A review of quantum embedding techniques for efficient information processing,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  40. [49]

    Learnability of quantum neural networks,

    Y . Du, M.-H. Hsieh, T. Liu, S. You, and D. Tao, “Learnability of quantum neural networks,” PRX quantum , vol. 2, no. 4, p. 040337, 2021

    2021

  41. [50]

    QoC: quantum on-chip training with parameter shift and gradient pruning,

    H. Wang, Z. Li, J. Gu, Y . Ding, D. Z. Pan, and S. Han, “QoC: quantum on-chip training with parameter shift and gradient pruning,” in Proceedings of the 59th ACM/IEEE design automation conference , pp. 655–660, 2022

    2022

  42. [51]

    Parameter hub: a rack-scale parameter server for distributed deep neural network training,

    L. Luo, J. Nelson, L. Ceze, A. Phanishayee, and A. Krishnamurthy, “Parameter hub: a rack-scale parameter server for distributed deep neural network training,” in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 41–54, 2018

    2018

  43. [52]

    Towards post-quantum security for cyber-physical systems: Integrating PQC into industrial m2m com- munication,

    S. Paul, P. Scheible, and F. Wiemer, “Towards post-quantum security for cyber-physical systems: Integrating PQC into industrial m2m com- munication,” Journal of Computer Security, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 623–653, 2022

    2022

  44. [53]

    Quantum federated learning with decentralized data,

    R. Huang, X. Tan, and Q. Xu, “Quantum federated learning with decentralized data,” IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics, vol. 28, no. 4: Mach. Learn. in Photon. Commun. and Meas. Syst., pp. 1–10, 2022. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS & TUTORIALS

    2022

  45. [54]

    A privacy- preserving framework for efficient network intrusion detection in con- sumer network using quantum federated learning,

    Z. Abou El Houda, H. Moudoud, B. Brik, and M. Adil, “A privacy- preserving framework for efficient network intrusion detection in con- sumer network using quantum federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics , 2024

    2024

  46. [55]

    Entanglement-controlled quantum federated learning,

    S. Park, H. Lee, S. Jung, J. Park, M. Bennis, and J. Kim, “Entanglement-controlled quantum federated learning,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2025

    2025

  47. [56]

    Fedqnn: Federated learning using quantum neural networks,

    N. Innan, M. A.-Z. Khan, A. Marchisio, M. Shafique, and M. Bennai, “Fedqnn: Federated learning using quantum neural networks,” in 2024 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , pp. 1–9, 2024

    2024

  48. [57]

    Hybrid quantum- classical computing in federated learning with data heterogeneity,

    K. Hisamori, Y .-H. Chiang, H. Lin, and Y . Ji, “Hybrid quantum- classical computing in federated learning with data heterogeneity,” in 2024 IEEE 35th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC) , pp. 1–6, 2024

    2024

  49. [58]

    The power of quantum neural networks,

    A. Abbas, D. Sutter, C. Zoufal, A. Lucchi, A. Figalli, and S. Woerner, “The power of quantum neural networks,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 403–409, 2021

    2021

  50. [59]

    Variational quantum algorithms for computational fluid dynamics,

    D. Jaksch, P. Givi, A. J. Daley, and T. Rung, “Variational quantum algorithms for computational fluid dynamics,” AIAA journal , vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1885–1894, 2023

    2023

  51. [60]

    Qfdsa: A quantum-secured federated learning system for smart grid dynamic security assessment,

    C. Ren, R. Yan, M. Xu, H. Yu, Y . Xu, D. Niyato, and Z. Y . Dong, “Qfdsa: A quantum-secured federated learning system for smart grid dynamic security assessment,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 8414–8426, 2023

    2023

  52. [61]

    Quan- tum internet—applications, functionalities, enabling technologies, chal- lenges, and research directions,

    A. Singh, K. Dev, H. Siljak, H. D. Joshi, and M. Magarini, “Quan- tum internet—applications, functionalities, enabling technologies, chal- lenges, and research directions,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 2218–2247, 2021

    2021

  53. [62]

    Joint adaptive aggregation and resource allocation for hierarchical federated learning systems based on edge-cloud collaboration,

    Y . Su, W. Fan, Q. Meng, P. Chen, and Y . Liu, “Joint adaptive aggregation and resource allocation for hierarchical federated learning systems based on edge-cloud collaboration,” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, 2025

    2025

  54. [63]

    Hierarchical federated learning across heterogeneous cellular networks,

    M. S. H. Abad, E. Ozfatura, D. Gunduz, and O. Ercetin, “Hierarchical federated learning across heterogeneous cellular networks,” in ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 8866–8870, 2020

    2020

  55. [64]

    Decentralized edge intelligence: A dynamic resource allocation framework for hierarchical federated learning,

    W. Y . B. Lim, J. S. Ng, Z. Xiong, J. Jin, Y . Zhang, D. Niyato, C. Leung, and C. Miao, “Decentralized edge intelligence: A dynamic resource allocation framework for hierarchical federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 53...

    2021

  56. [65]

    Quantum-safe federated learning: Enhancing data privacy and security,

    E. Kannan, C. M. B. MJ, S. Ravikumar, S. Kannan, K. Vijay, et al. , “Quantum-safe federated learning: Enhancing data privacy and security,” in 2024 International Conference on Emerging Research in Computational Science (ICERCS) , pp. 1–6, 2024

    2024

  57. [66]

    Post-quantum era privacy protection for intelligent infrastructures,

    L. Malina, P. Dzurenda, S. Ricci, J. Hajny, G. Srivastava, R. Mat- uleviˇcius, A.-A. O. Affia, M. Laurent, N. H. Sultan, and Q. Tang, “Post-quantum era privacy protection for intelligent infrastructures,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 36038–36077, 2021

    2021

  58. [67]

    Effi- cient quantum network communication using optimized entanglement swapping trees,

    M. Ghaderibaneh, C. Zhan, H. Gupta, and C. Ramakrishnan, “Effi- cient quantum network communication using optimized entanglement swapping trees,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering , vol. 3, pp. 1–20, 2022

    2022

  59. [68]

    From federated learning to quantum federated learning for space-air-ground integrated networks,

    V . K. Quy, N. M. Quy, T. T. Hoai, S. Shaon, M. R. Uddin, T. Nguyen, D. C. Nguyen, A. Kaushik, and P. Chatzimisios, “From federated learning to quantum federated learning for space-air-ground integrated networks,” in 2024 IEEE Conference on Standards for Communications and Net...

    2024

  60. [69]

    Dynamic quantum federated learning for satellite-ground integrated systems using slimmable quantum neural networks,

    S. Park, S. Jung, and J. Kim, “Dynamic quantum federated learning for satellite-ground integrated systems using slimmable quantum neural networks,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  61. [70]

    Osi stack redesign for quantum networks: Requirements, technologies, challenges, and future directions,

    S. Ahmed, M. K. Saeed, and A. Khokhar, “Osi stack redesign for quantum networks: Requirements, technologies, challenges, and future directions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.12195 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  62. [71]

    Nisq quantum computing: A security-centric tutorial and survey [feature],

    F. Chen, L. Jiang, H. M ¨uller, P. Richerme, C. Chu, Z. Fu, and M. Yang, “Nisq quantum computing: A security-centric tutorial and survey [feature],” IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine , vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 14–32, 2024

    2024

  63. [72]

    Free-space optical quantum communications in turbulent channels with receiver diversity,

    R. Yuan and J. Cheng, “Free-space optical quantum communications in turbulent channels with receiver diversity,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 68, no. 9, pp. 5706–5717, 2020

    2020

  64. [73]

    Quantum federated learning for multimodal data: A modality-agnostic approach,

    A. Pokharel, R. Rahman, T. Morris, and D. C. Nguyen, “Quantum federated learning for multimodal data: A modality-agnostic approach,” in Proceedings of the Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Con- ference, pp. 545–554, 2025

    2025

  65. [74]

    Power allocation for quantum-limited multihop free- space optical communication systems,

    C. Abou-Rjeily, “Power allocation for quantum-limited multihop free- space optical communication systems,” IEEE communications letters , vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 2068–2071, 2012

  66. [75]

    Design and performance of relay-assisted satellite free-space optical quantum key distribution systems,

    M. Q. Vu, T. V . Pham, N. T. Dang, and A. T. Pham, “Design and performance of relay-assisted satellite free-space optical quantum key distribution systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 122498–122510, 2020

    2020

  67. [76]

    Federated quantum natural gradient descent for quantum federated learning,

    J. Qi and M.-H. Hsieh, “Federated quantum natural gradient descent for quantum federated learning,” in Federated Learning, pp. 329–341, Elsevier, 2024

    2024

  68. [77]

    Optimizing quantum feder- ated learning based on federated quantum natural gradient descent,

    J. Qi, X.-L. Zhang, and J. Tejedor, “Optimizing quantum feder- ated learning based on federated quantum natural gradient descent,” in ICASSP 2023-2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) , pp. 1–5, 2023

    2023

  69. [78]

    Layer vqe: A variational approach for combinatorial optimization on noisy quantum computers,

    X. Liu, A. Angone, R. Shaydulin, I. Safro, Y . Alexeev, and L. Cincio, “Layer vqe: A variational approach for combinatorial optimization on noisy quantum computers,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineer- ing, vol. 3, pp. 1–20, 2022

    2022

  70. [79]

    Implementation of quantum annealing: A systematic review,

    L. P. Yulianti and K. Surendro, “Implementation of quantum annealing: A systematic review,” Ieee Access, vol. 10, pp. 73156–73177, 2022

    2022

  71. [80]

    Quantum deep deterministic policy gradient for digital twin-enabled semantic iov networks,

    J. A. Ansere, S. C. Prabhashana, N. Simmons, O. A. Dobre, H. Shin, and T. Q. Duong, “Quantum deep deterministic policy gradient for digital twin-enabled semantic iov networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering , 2025

    2025

  72. [81]

    Optimal solving of a scheduling problem using quantum annealing metaheuristics on the d-wave quan- tum solver,

    W. Bo ˙zejko, R. Klempous, J. Pempera, J. Rozenblit, C. Smutnicki, M. Uchro ´nski, and M. Wodecki, “Optimal solving of a scheduling problem using quantum annealing metaheuristics on the d-wave quan- tum solver,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 2024

    2024

  73. [82]

    Variational quantum based simulation of cylindrical waveguides,

    E. Colella, B. A. Baldwin, S. F. Kelso, L. Bastianelli, V . M. Primiani, F. Moglie, and G. Gradoni, “Variational quantum based simulation of cylindrical waveguides,” IEEE Journal on Multiscale and Multiphysics Computational Techniques, 2025

    2025

  74. [83]

    Quantum natural stochastic pairwise coordinate descent,

    M. A. Sohail, M. Heidari, and S. S. Pradhan, “Quantum natural stochastic pairwise coordinate descent,” npj Quantum Information , vol. 11, no. 1, p. 109, 2025

    2025

  75. [84]

    Quantum natural gradient with thermal-state initialization,

    M. Minervini, D. Patel, and M. M. Wilde, “Quantum natural gradient with thermal-state initialization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.19487 , 2025

    2025 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Variational quantum eigensolver approach to prime factorization on ibm’s noisy interme- diate scale quantum computer,

    M. Sobhani, Y . Chai, T. Hartung, and K. Jansen, “Variational quantum eigensolver approach to prime factorization on ibm’s noisy interme- diate scale quantum computer,” Physical Review A , vol. 111, no. 4, p. 042413, 2025

    2025

  77. [86]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface (ris)- assisted entanglement distribution in fso quantum networks,

    M. Chehimi, M. Elhattab, W. Saad, G. Vardoyan, N. K. Panigrahy, C. Assi, and D. Towsley, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface (ris)- assisted entanglement distribution in fso quantum networks,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications , 2025

    2025

  78. [87]

    Communication-efficient quantum federated learning optimization for multi-center healthcare data,

    A. S. Bhatia, M. K. Saggi, and S. Kais, “Communication-efficient quantum federated learning optimization for multi-center healthcare data,” in IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics, 2024

    2024

  79. [88]

    Adaptive resource allocation in quantum key distribution (qkd) for federated learning,

    R. Kaewpuang, M. Xu, D. Niyato, H. Yu, Z. Xiong, and X. S. Shen, “Adaptive resource allocation in quantum key distribution (qkd) for federated learning,” in IEEE International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) , pp. 71–76, 2023

    2023

  80. [89]

    Federated quantum neural network with quantum teleportation for resource optimization in future wireless communication,

    B. Narottama and S. Y . Shin, “Federated quantum neural network with quantum teleportation for resource optimization in future wireless communication,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 14717–14733, 2023

    2023

  81. [90]

    A tutorial on quantum approximate optimization algorithm (qaoa): Fundamentals and applications,

    J. Choi and J. Kim, “A tutorial on quantum approximate optimization algorithm (qaoa): Fundamentals and applications,” in 2019 interna- tional conference on information and communication technology con- vergence (ICTC), pp. 138–142, 2019

    2019

  82. [91]

    Quantum cryptography for future networks security: A systematic review,

    M. Imran, A. B. Altamimi, W. Khan, S. Hussain, M. Alsaffar, et al. , “Quantum cryptography for future networks security: A systematic review,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  83. [92]

    Quantum cryptography: an overview of quantum key distribution,

    D. Rusca and N. Gisin, “Quantum cryptography: an overview of quantum key distribution,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.04044 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  84. [93]

    Quantum-secured collaborative machine learn- ing: Facilitating privacy-protecting quantum federated learning,

    S. Ravikumar, E. Chandralekha, K. Vijay, K. Antony Kumar, and C. Pretty Diana Cyril, “Quantum-secured collaborative machine learn- ing: Facilitating privacy-protecting quantum federated learning,” in International Conference on Computing and Communication Networks, pp. 537–550...

    2023

  85. [94]

    A multi-valued quantum fully homomorphic encryption scheme,

    Y . Zhang, T. Shang, and J. Liu, “A multi-valued quantum fully homomorphic encryption scheme,” Quantum Information Processing , vol. 20, pp. 1–25, 2021

    2021

  86. [95]

    Privacy and correctness trade-offs for information-theoretically secure quantum homomorphic encryption,

    Y . Hu, Y . Ouyang, and M. Tomamichel, “Privacy and correctness trade-offs for information-theoretically secure quantum homomorphic encryption,” Quantum, vol. 7, p. 976, 2023

    2023

  87. [96]

    Quantum differential privacy: An information theory perspective,

    C. Hirche, C. Rouz ´e, and D. S. Franc ¸a, “Quantum differential privacy: An information theory perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 69, no. 9, pp. 5771–5787, 2023

    2023

  88. [97]

    Bridging quantum computing and differential privacy: Insights into quantum computing privacy,

    Y . Zhao, H. Zhong, X. Zhang, Y . Li, C. Zhang, and M. Pan, “Bridging quantum computing and differential privacy: Insights into quantum computing privacy,” in 2024 IEEE International Conference on Quan- tum Computing and Engineering (QCE) , vol. 1, pp. 13–24, 2024

    2024

  89. [98]

    Universal blind quantum computation with improved brickwork states,

    S. Ma, C. Zhu, X. Liu, H. Li, and S. Li, “Universal blind quantum computation with improved brickwork states,” Physical Review A , vol. 109, no. 1, p. 012606, 2024

    2024

  90. [99]

    Private set intersection with delegated blind quan- tum computing,

    M. Amoretti, “Private set intersection with delegated blind quan- tum computing,” in 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), pp. 1–6, 2021

    2021

  91. [100]

    Quantum-enhanced federated learning for metaverse-empowered ve- hicular networks,

    B. Hazarika, K. Singh, O. A. Dobre, C.-P. Li, and T. Q. Duong, “Quantum-enhanced federated learning for metaverse-empowered ve- hicular networks,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , 2024

    2024

  92. [101]

    Quantum federated learning for vehicular computing sce- narios,

    J. Kim, “Quantum federated learning for vehicular computing sce- narios,” in 2023 14th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), pp. 168–172, 2023

    2023

  93. [102]

    Quantum- driven context-aware federated learning in heterogeneous vehicular metaverse ecosystem,

    B. Hazarika, K. Singh, T. Q. Duong, and O. A. Dobre, “Quantum- driven context-aware federated learning in heterogeneous vehicular metaverse ecosystem,” in ICC 2024-IEEE International Conference on Communications, pp. 1533–1538, 2024

    2024

  94. [103]

    Exploring computing paradigms for electric vehicles: from cloud to edge intelligence, challenges and future directions,

    S. B. Chougule, B. S. Chaudhari, S. N. Ghorpade, and M. Zennaro, “Exploring computing paradigms for electric vehicles: from cloud to edge intelligence, challenges and future directions,” World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, p. 39, 2024

    2024

  95. [104]

    A scientometric analysis of quantum driven innova- tions in intelligent transportation systems,

    S. K. Sood et al., “A scientometric analysis of quantum driven innova- tions in intelligent transportation systems,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence , vol. 138, p. 109258, 2024

    2024

  96. [105]

    Fundamentals of quantum communication networks: Scalability, efficiency, and distributed quantum machine learning,

    M. Chehimi, “Fundamentals of quantum communication networks: Scalability, efficiency, and distributed quantum machine learning,” 2024

    2024

  97. [106]

    Enabling technologies for ai empowered 6g massive radio access networks,

    M. Shahjalal, W. Kim, W. Khalid, S. Moon, M. Khan, S. Liu, S. Lim, E. Kim, D.-W. Yun, J. Lee, et al. , “Enabling technologies for ai empowered 6g massive radio access networks,” ICT Express , vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 341–355, 2023

    2023

  98. [107]

    Oqfl: An optimized quantum-based federated learning framework for defending against adversarial attacks in intelligent transportation systems,

    W. Yamany, N. Moustafa, and B. Turnbull, “Oqfl: An optimized quantum-based federated learning framework for defending against adversarial attacks in intelligent transportation systems,”IEEE Transac- tions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 893–903, 2021

    2021

  99. [108]

    Secure federated learning in quantum autonomous vehicular networks,

    Q. Xu, L. Zhao, Z. Su, D. Fang, and R. Li, “Secure federated learning in quantum autonomous vehicular networks,” IEEE Network, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 240–247, 2023

    2023

  100. [109]

    DAQFL: Dynamic aggre- gation quantum federated learning algorithm for intelligent diagnosis in internet of medical things,

    Z. Qu, X. Zhao, L. Sun, and G. Muhammad, “DAQFL: Dynamic aggre- gation quantum federated learning algorithm for intelligent diagnosis in internet of medical things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal , 2025

    2025

  101. [110]

    Quantum-inspired privacy-preserving federated learning framework for secure dementia classification,

    G. Tanbhir and M. F. Shahriyar, “Quantum-inspired privacy-preserving federated learning framework for secure dementia classification,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03267, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  102. [111]

    A novel framework for quantum-enhanced federated learning with edge computing for advanced pain assessment using ecg signals via continuous wavelet transform images,

    M. Balasubramani, M. Srinivasan, W.-H. Jean, S.-Z. Fan, and J.-S. Shieh, “A novel framework for quantum-enhanced federated learning with edge computing for advanced pain assessment using ecg signals via continuous wavelet transform images,” Sensors, vol. 25, no. 5, p. 1436, 2025

    2025

  103. [112]

    Federated learning with tensor networks: a quantum ai framework for healthcare,

    A. S. Bhatia and D. E. B. Neira, “Federated learning with tensor networks: a quantum ai framework for healthcare,” Machine Learning: Science and Technology, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 045035, 2024

    2024

  104. [113]

    Privacy- preserving hybrid federated learning framework for mental healthcare applications: Clustered and quantum approaches,

    A. Gupta, M. K. Maurya, K. Dhere, and V . K. Chaurasiya, “Privacy- preserving hybrid federated learning framework for mental healthcare applications: Clustered and quantum approaches,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  105. [114]

    Ai-driven big data analytics for personalized medicine in healthcare: Integrating federated learning, blockchain, and quantum computing,

    S. Mondal, S. Das, S. S. Golder, R. Bose, S. Sutradhar, and H. Mondal, “Ai-driven big data analytics for personalized medicine in healthcare: Integrating federated learning, blockchain, and quantum computing,” in 2024 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Qua...

    2024

  106. [115]

    Revolutionizing healthcare: the emerging role of quantum computing in enhancing medical technology and treatment,

    N. Jeyaraman, M. Jeyaraman, S. Yadav, S. Ramasubramanian, and S. Balaji, “Revolutionizing healthcare: the emerging role of quantum computing in enhancing medical technology and treatment,” Cureus, vol. 16, no. 8, 2024

    2024

  107. [116]

    Hybrid quantum image classification and federated learning for hepatic steatosis diagnosis,

    L. Lusnig, A. Sagingalieva, M. Surmach, T. Protasevich, O. Michiu, J. McLoughlin, C. Mansell, G. de’Petris, D. Bonazza, F. Zanconati, et al., “Hybrid quantum image classification and federated learning for hepatic steatosis diagnosis,” Diagnostics, vol. 14, no. 5, p. 558, 2024

    2024

  108. [117]

    Hqnet: A hybrid quantum network for multi-class mri brain classification via quantum computing,

    A. Wang, D. Mao, X. Li, T. Li, and L. Li, “Hqnet: A hybrid quantum network for multi-class mri brain classification via quantum computing,” Expert Systems with Applications , vol. 261, p. 125537, 2025

    2025

  109. [118]

    Quantum fuzzy federated learning for privacy protection in intelligent information processing,

    Z. Qu, L. Zhang, and P. Tiwari, “Quantum fuzzy federated learning for privacy protection in intelligent information processing,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems , 2024

    2024

  110. [119]

    An introduction to quantum machine learning: from quantum logic to quantum deep learning,

    L. Alchieri, D. Badalotti, P. Bonardi, and S. Bianco, “An introduction to quantum machine learning: from quantum logic to quantum deep learning,” Quantum Machine Intelligence , vol. 3, no. 2, p. 28, 2021

    2021

  111. [120]

    Safeguarding next-generation multiple access using physical layer security techniques: A tutorial,

    L. Lv, D. Xu, R. Q. Hu, Y . Ye, L. Yang, X. Lei, X. Wang, D. I. Kim, and A. Nallanathan, “Safeguarding next-generation multiple access using physical layer security techniques: A tutorial,” Proceedings of the IEEE, 2024

    2024

  112. [121]

    Efficient resource allocation for building the metaverse with uavs: A quantum collective reinforcement learning approach,

    Y . Wang, Y . He, F. R. Yu, B. Song, and V . C. Leung, “Efficient resource allocation for building the metaverse with uavs: A quantum collective reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 152–159, 2023

    2023

  113. [122]

    Joint quantum reinforcement learning and stabilized control for spatio- temporal coordination in metaverse,

    S. Park, J. Chung, C. Park, S. Jung, M. Choi, S. Cho, and J. Kim, “Joint quantum reinforcement learning and stabilized control for spatio- temporal coordination in metaverse,” IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 2024

    2024

  114. [123]

    Quantum collective learning and many-to-many matching game in the metaverse for connected and autonomous vehicles,

    Y . Ren, R. Xie, F. R. Yu, T. Huang, and Y . Liu, “Quantum collective learning and many-to-many matching game in the metaverse for connected and autonomous vehicles,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 12128–12139, 2022

    2022

  115. [124]

    Slimmable quantum federated learning,

    W. J. Yun, J. P. Kim, S. Jung, J. Park, M. Bennis, and J. Kim, “Slimmable quantum federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.10221, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  116. [125]

    Hybrid quantum enhanced fed- erated learning for cyber attack detection,

    G. Subramanian and M. Chinnadurai, “Hybrid quantum enhanced fed- erated learning for cyber attack detection,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 32038, 2024

    2024

  117. [126]

    Qfal: Quantum federated adversarial learning,

    W. E. Maouaki, N. Innan, A. Marchisio, T. Said, M. Bennai, and M. Shafique, “Qfal: Quantum federated adversarial learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.21171, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  118. [127]

    Variational quantum circuit and quantum key distribution-based quantum federated learning: A case of smart grid dynamic security assessment,

    C. Ren, M. Xu, H. Yu, Z. Xiong, Z. Zhang, and D. Niyato, “Variational quantum circuit and quantum key distribution-based quantum federated learning: A case of smart grid dynamic security assessment,” in IEEE International Conference on Communications , pp. 1115–1120, 2024

    2024

  119. [128]

    False data injection attack detection in edge-based smart metering networks with federated learning,

    M. R. Uddin, R. Rahman, and D. C. Nguyen, “False data injection attack detection in edge-based smart metering networks with federated learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.01313 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  120. [129]

    Enhancing dynamic security assessment in smart grids through quan- tum federated learning,

    C. Ren, Z. Y . Dong, M. Skoglund, Y . Gao, T. Wang, and R. Zhang, “Enhancing dynamic security assessment in smart grids through quan- tum federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2024

    2024

  121. [130]

    Toward isac-empowered vehicular networks: Framework, advances, and opportunities,

    Z. Du, F. Liu, Y . Li, W. Yuan, Y . Cui, Z. Zhang, C. Masouros, and B. Ai, “Toward isac-empowered vehicular networks: Framework, advances, and opportunities,” IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 222–229, 2025

    2025

  122. [131]

    Dis- tributed collaborative computing for task completion rate maximization in vehicular edge computing,

    L. Liu, Z. Zhao, J. Feng, F. Xu, Y . Zhang, Q. Pei, and M. Xiao, “Dis- tributed collaborative computing for task completion rate maximization in vehicular edge computing,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Trans- portation Systems, 2025

    2025

  123. [132]

    Performance analysis and design of a weighted personalized quantum federated learning,

    D. Gurung and S. R. Pokhrel, “Performance analysis and design of a weighted personalized quantum federated learning,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence , 2025

    2025

  124. [133]

    Quantum computing-accelerated kalman filtering for satellite clusters: Algorithms and comparative analysis,

    S. Prakash, R. Bhattacherjee, S. Bitragunta, A. Bhatia, and K. Tiwari, “Quantum computing-accelerated kalman filtering for satellite clusters: Algorithms and comparative analysis,” IEEE Open Journal of the Computer Society, 2025

    2025

  125. [134]

    Edge intelligence in satellite-terrestrial networks with hybrid quantum computing,

    S. Huang, L. Wang, X. Wang, B. Tan, W. Ni, and K.-K. Wong, “Edge intelligence in satellite-terrestrial networks with hybrid quantum computing,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , 2025

    2025

  126. [135]

    Quantum federated learning for metaverse: Analysis, design and implementation,

    D. Gurung, S. R. Pokhrel, and G. Li, “Quantum federated learning for metaverse: Analysis, design and implementation,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management , 2025

    2025

  127. [136]

    Ibm’s qiskit tool chain: Working with and developing for real quantum computers,

    R. Wille, R. Van Meter, and Y . Naveh, “Ibm’s qiskit tool chain: Working with and developing for real quantum computers,” in 2019 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE), pp. 1234–1240, 2019

    2019

  128. [137]

    Pennylane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations,

    V . Bergholm, J. Izaac, M. Schuld, C. Gogolin, S. Ahmed, V . Ajith, M. S. Alam, G. Alonso-Linaje, B. AkashNarayanan, A. Asadi, et al., “Pennylane: Automatic differentiation of hybrid quantum-classical computations,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.04968 , 2018

    2018 arXiv

  129. [138]

    Wang, Toward Practical Quantum Computing Systems with Intel- ligent Cross-Stack Co-Design

    H. Wang, Toward Practical Quantum Computing Systems with Intel- ligent Cross-Stack Co-Design . PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2024. IEEE COMMUNICATIONS SURVEYS & TUTORIALS

    2024

  130. [139]

    Programming quantum neural networks on nisq systems: An overview of technologies and methodologies,

    S. Markidis, “Programming quantum neural networks on nisq systems: An overview of technologies and methodologies,” Entropy, vol. 25, no. 4, p. 694, 2023

    2023

  131. [140]

    Continuous variable quantum compila- tion,

    F. Rueda and S. L. Alarcon, “Continuous variable quantum compila- tion,” in 2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) , pp. 1765–1770, 2021

    2021

  132. [141]

    Pytorch 2: Faster machine learning through dynamic python bytecode transformation and graph compilation,

    J. Ansel, E. Yang, H. He, N. Gimelshein, A. Jain, M. V oznesensky, B. Bao, P. Bell, D. Berard, E. Burovski, et al. , “Pytorch 2: Faster machine learning through dynamic python bytecode transformation and graph compilation,” in Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conferen...

    2024

  133. [142]

    Tensorflow eager: A multi-stage, python-embedded dsl for machine learning,

    A. Agrawal, A. Modi, A. Passos, A. Lavoie, A. Agarwal, A. Shankar, I. Ganichev, J. Levenberg, M. Hong, R. Monga, et al. , “Tensorflow eager: A multi-stage, python-embedded dsl for machine learning,” Proceedings of Machine Learning and Systems , vol. 1, pp. 178–189, 2019

    2019

  134. [143]

    Flower: A friendly federated learning framework,

    D. J. Beutel, T. Topal, A. Mathur, X. Qiu, J. Fernandez-Marques, Y . Gao, L. Sani, K. H. Li, T. Parcollet, P. P. B. de Gusm ˜ao, et al. , “Flower: A friendly federated learning framework,” 2022

    2022

  135. [144]

    A tutorial on federated learning from theory to practice: Foundations, software frameworks, exemplary use cases, and selected trends,

    M. V . Luz ´on, N. Rodr´ıguez-Barroso, A. Argente-Garrido, D. Jim ´enez- L´opez, J. M. Moyano, J. Del Ser, W. Ding, and F. Herrera, “A tutorial on federated learning from theory to practice: Foundations, software frameworks, exemplary use cases, and selected trends,” IEEE/CAA ...

    2024

  136. [145]

    Openfed: A compre- hensive and versatile open-source federated learning framework,

    D. Chen, V . J. Tan, Z. Lu, E. Wu, and J. Hu, “Openfed: A compre- hensive and versatile open-source federated learning framework,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5018–5026, 2023

    2023

  137. [146]

    Ibm quantum computers: Evolution, performance, and future directions,

    M. AbuGhanem, “Ibm quantum computers: Evolution, performance, and future directions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00916 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  138. [147]

    A qualitative evaluation of multiple quantum computing frameworks,

    R. Bansal, M. Khanna, and N. K. Rajput, “A qualitative evaluation of multiple quantum computing frameworks,” in 2024 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computation, Communication and Infor- mation Technology (ICAICCIT), vol. 1, pp. 1296–1302, 2024

    2024

  139. [148]

    Quantum programming on azure quan- tum—an open source tool for quantum developers,

    K. Prateek and S. Maity, “Quantum programming on azure quan- tum—an open source tool for quantum developers,” in Quantum Computing: A Shift from Bits to Qubits , pp. 283–309, Springer, 2023

    2023

  140. [149]

    Nisq computers: a path to quantum supremacy,

    M. AbuGhanem and H. Eleuch, “Nisq computers: a path to quantum supremacy,” IEEE Access, 2024

    2024

  141. [150]

    Quantum computer simulations at warp speed: Assessing the impact of gpu acceleration: A case study with ibm qiskit aer, nvidia thrust & cuquantum,

    J. Faj, I. Peng, J. Wahlgren, and S. Markidis, “Quantum computer simulations at warp speed: Assessing the impact of gpu acceleration: A case study with ibm qiskit aer, nvidia thrust & cuquantum,” in 2023 IEEE 19th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science) , pp. 1– 10, 2023

    2023

  142. [151]

    When quantum meets classical: Characterizing hybrid quantum-classical is- sues discussed in developer forums,

    J. Zappin, T. Stalnaker, O. Chaparro, and D. Poshyvanyk, “When quantum meets classical: Characterizing hybrid quantum-classical is- sues discussed in developer forums,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.16884, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  143. [152]

    Qasmbench: A low- level quantum benchmark suite for nisq evaluation and simulation,

    A. Li, S. Stein, S. Krishnamoorthy, and J. Ang, “Qasmbench: A low- level quantum benchmark suite for nisq evaluation and simulation,” ACM Transactions on Quantum Computing , vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 1–26, 2023

    2023

  144. [153]

    Hybrid classical-quantum software services systems: Exploration of the rough edges,

    D. Valencia, J. Garcia-Alonso, J. Rojo, E. Moguel, J. Berrocal, and J. M. Murillo, “Hybrid classical-quantum software services systems: Exploration of the rough edges,” in International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology, pp. 225–238, Springer, 2021

    2021

  145. [154]

    Federated quanvolutional neural network: a new paradigm for collaborative quantum learning,

    A. S. Bhatia, S. Kais, and M. A. Alam, “Federated quanvolutional neural network: a new paradigm for collaborative quantum learning,” Quantum Science and Technology , vol. 8, no. 4, p. 045032, 2023

    2023

  146. [155]

    Qfnn-ffd: Quantum federated neural network for financial fraud detection,

    N. Innan, A. Marchisio, M. Bennai, and M. Shafique, “Qfnn-ffd: Quantum federated neural network for financial fraud detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.02595, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  147. [156]

    Anomaly detection with robust deep autoencoders,

    C. Zhou and R. C. Paffenroth, “Anomaly detection with robust deep autoencoders,” in Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , pp. 665–674, 2017

    2017

  148. [157]

    Feddetect: A novel privacy-preserving federated learning framework for energy theft detection in smart grid,

    M. Wen, R. Xie, K. Lu, L. Wang, and K. Zhang, “Feddetect: A novel privacy-preserving federated learning framework for energy theft detection in smart grid,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 6069–6080, 2021

    2021

  149. [158]

    Multimodal federated learning with model personalization,

    R. Rahman and D. C.Nguyen, “Multimodal federated learning with model personalization,” in OPT 2024: Optimization for Machine Learn- ing, 2024

    2024

  150. [159]

    An application of machine learning to anomaly detection,

    T. Lane and C. E. Brodley, “An application of machine learning to anomaly detection,” in Proceedings of the 20th national information systems security conference , vol. 377, pp. 366–380, Baltimore, USA, 1997

    1997

  151. [160]

    Scalable and interpretable one-class svms with deep learning and random fourier features,

    M.-N. Nguyen and N. A. Vien, “Scalable and interpretable one-class svms with deep learning and random fourier features,” in Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Confer- ence, ECML PKDD 2018, Dublin, Ireland, September 10–14, 2018, Proceedings, Part I...

    2018

  152. [161]

    Deep one-class classification,

    L. Ruff, R. Vandermeulen, N. Goernitz, L. Deecke, S. A. Siddiqui, A. Binder, E. M ¨uller, and M. Kloft, “Deep one-class classification,” in International conference on machine learning , pp. 4393–4402, PMLR, 2018

    2018

  153. [162]

    Panda: Adapting pretrained features for anomaly detection and segmentation,

    T. Reiss, N. Cohen, L. Bergman, and Y . Hoshen, “Panda: Adapting pretrained features for anomaly detection and segmentation,” in Pro- ceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 2806–2814, 2021

    2021

  154. [163]

    Csi: Novelty detection via contrastive learning on distributionally shifted instances,

    J. Tack, S. Mo, J. Jeong, and J. Shin, “Csi: Novelty detection via contrastive learning on distributionally shifted instances,” Advances in neural information processing systems , vol. 33, pp. 11839–11852, 2020

    2020

  155. [164]

    Our suggested QFL approach, however, performs best on all measures, showing the best AUROC and AUPR values in all settings and noticeably reduced false and missing error rates

    demonstrate a better balance between false and missing errors, while FADngs [165] federated contrastive learning design helps it achieve significant improvements in AUROC and AUPR. Our suggested QFL approach, however, performs best on all measures, showing the best AUROC and A...

  156. [165]

    Elsa: Energy- based learning for semi-supervised anomaly detection,

    S. Han, H. Song, S. Lee, S. Park, and M. Cha, “Elsa: Energy- based learning for semi-supervised anomaly detection,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.15296, 2021

    2021 arXiv

  157. [166]

    Fadngs: Fed- erated learning for anomaly detection,

    B. Dong, D. Chen, Y . Wu, S. Tang, and Y . Zhuang, “Fadngs: Fed- erated learning for anomaly detection,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems , 2024

    2024

  158. [167]

    Quantum neural network autoencoder and classifier applied to an industrial case study,

    S. Mangini, A. Marruzzo, M. Piantanida, D. Gerace, D. Bajoni, and C. Macchiavello, “Quantum neural network autoencoder and classifier applied to an industrial case study,” Quantum Machine Intelligence , vol. 4, no. 2, p. 13, 2022

    2022

  159. [168]

    Network anomaly detection using quantum neural networks on noisy quantum computers,

    A. Kukliansky, M. Orescanin, C. Bollmann, and T. Huffmire, “Network anomaly detection using quantum neural networks on noisy quantum computers,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 1– 11, 2024

    2024

  160. [169]

    Data reconstruction based on quantum neural networks,

    M.-M. Wang and Y .-D. Jiang, “Data reconstruction based on quantum neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.05711 , 2022

    2022 arXiv

  161. [170]

    Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,

    A. Krizhevsky, G. Hinton, et al., “Learning multiple layers of features from tiny images,” 2009

    2009

  162. [171]

    Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,

    J. Deng, W. Dong, R. Socher, L.-J. Li, K. Li, and L. Fei-Fei, “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pp. 248–255, 2009

    2009

  163. [172]

    The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms,

    A. P. Bradley, “The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms,” Pattern recognition, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1145–1159, 1997

    1997

  164. [173]

    Area under the precision-recall curve: point estimates and confidence intervals,

    K. Boyd, K. H. Eng, and C. D. Page, “Area under the precision-recall curve: point estimates and confidence intervals,” in Machine Learn- ing and Knowledge Discovery in Databases: European Conference, ECML PKDD 2013, Prague, Czech Republic, September 23-27, 2013, Proceedings, P...

    2013

  165. [174]

    Quantum machine learning for 6g communication networks: State-of-the-art and vision for the future,

    S. J. Nawaz, S. K. Sharma, S. Wyne, M. N. Patwary, and M. Asaduz- zaman, “Quantum machine learning for 6g communication networks: State-of-the-art and vision for the future,” IEEE access , vol. 7, pp. 46317–46350, 2019

    2019

  166. [175]

    A novel architecture for future classical-quantum commu- nication networks,

    F. Granelli, R. Bassoli, J. N ¨otzel, F. H. Fitzek, H. Boche, and N. L. da Fonseca, “A novel architecture for future classical-quantum commu- nication networks,” Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing , vol. 2022, no. 1, p. 3770994, 2022

    2022

  167. [176]

    Hybrid quantum–classical generative adversarial network for high-resolution image generation,

    S. L. Tsang, M. T. West, S. M. Erfani, and M. Usman, “Hybrid quantum–classical generative adversarial network for high-resolution image generation,” IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 1–19, 2023

    2023

  168. [177]

    Bc-qnet: A quantum-infused elm model for breast cancer diagnosis,

    A. Bilal, A. Imran, X. Liu, X. Liu, Z. Ahmad, M. Shafiq, A. M. El- Sherbeeny, and H. Long, “Bc-qnet: A quantum-infused elm model for breast cancer diagnosis,” Computers in biology and medicine, vol. 175, p. 108483, 2024

    2024

  169. [178]

    Scalability of quantum error mitigation techniques: from utility to advantage,

    S. N. Filippov, S. Maniscalco, and G. Garc ´ıa-P´erez, “Scalability of quantum error mitigation techniques: from utility to advantage,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.13542, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  170. [179]

    Quantum odyssey: Traversing the nisq era’s quantum terrain,

    S. Arya, S. A. Ansar, and S. Aggarwal, “Quantum odyssey: Traversing the nisq era’s quantum terrain,” in 2023 3rd International Conference on Technological Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICTACS) , pp. 686–694, 2023

    2023

  171. [180]

    Security of federated learning in 6g era: A review on conceptual techniques and software platforms used for research and analysis,

    S. H. A. Kazmi, F. Qamar, R. Hassan, K. Nisar, and M. A. Al-Betar, “Security of federated learning in 6g era: A review on conceptual techniques and software platforms used for research and analysis,” Computer Networks, p. 110358, 2024

    2024

  172. [181]

    Standardization and innovation: Standards devel- opment principles,

    J. Roy Chowdhury, “Standardization and innovation: Standards devel- opment principles,” in Handbook of Quality System, Accreditation and Conformity Assessment, pp. 1–30, Springer, 2024

    2024

  173. [182]

    Federated learning for enhanced cyber- security and trustworthiness in 5g and 6g networks: A comprehensive survey,

    A. Blika, S. Palmos, G. Doukas, V . Lamprou, S. Pelekis, M. Kontoulis, C. Ntanos, and D. Askounis, “Federated learning for enhanced cyber- security and trustworthiness in 5g and 6g networks: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society , 2024

    2024

  174. [183]

    Quantum communication: From funda- mentals to recent trends, challenges and open problems,

    H. Dutta and A. K. Bhuyan, “Quantum communication: From funda- mentals to recent trends, challenges and open problems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04492, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  175. [184]

    Revolutionizing machine learning security: The role of quantum- enhanced federated learning,

    E. Kannan, S. Ravikumar, M. Carmel Mary Belinda, K. Vijay, et al., “Revolutionizing machine learning security: The role of quantum- enhanced federated learning,” in 2024 International Conference on Emerging Research in Computational Science (ICERCS) , pp. 1–6, 2024

    2024

  176. [185]

    Integration of hybrid networks, ai, ultra massive-mimo, thz frequency, and fbmc modulation toward 6g requirements: A review,

    N. A. Alhaj, M. F. Jamlos, S. A. Manap, S. Abdelsalam, A. A. Bakhit, R. Mamat, M. A. Jamlos, M. S. M. Gismalla, and M. Hamdan, “Integration of hybrid networks, ai, ultra massive-mimo, thz frequency, and fbmc modulation toward 6g requirements: A review,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp...

    2023

  177. [186]

    Quantum property learning for nisq networks: Universal quantum witness machines,

    U. Khalid, J. ur Rehman, H. Jung, T. Q. Duong, O. A. Dobre, and H. Shin, “Quantum property learning for nisq networks: Universal quantum witness machines,” IEEE Transactions on Communications , 2024

    2024

  178. [187]

    Quantum-inspired machine learning for 6g: fundamentals, se- curity, resource allocations, challenges, and future research directions,

    T. Q. Duong, J. A. Ansere, B. Narottama, V . Sharma, O. A. Dobre, and H. Shin, “Quantum-inspired machine learning for 6g: fundamentals, se- curity, resource allocations, challenges, and future research directions,” IEEE open journal of vehicular technology , vol. 3, pp. 375–387, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.