Precision optomechanical accelerometer via hybrid test mass integration

Benjamin J. Carey; Erick Romero; Glen I. Harris; Leo Sementilli; Margaret Wegener; Nathaniel Bawden; Nishta Arora; Poh-Meng Yeo; Victor M. Valenzuela; Warwick P. Bowen

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Precision optomechanical accelerometer via hybrid test mass integration

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper demonstrates a pick-and-place hybrid test mass—a 95 mg platinum sphere bonded to a silicon nitride trampoline—that yields a quality factor of 1900 in air and a thermomechanical noise floor of 0.8 ng/√Hz, with the best peak sensiti

desk verdict A plausible new integration trick with a record chip-scale accelerometer sensitivity, but the abstract leaves the rigid-bond assumption unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16088 v1 pith:UW26XD4W submitted 2025-08-22 physics.app-ph

Nathaniel Bawden , Benjamin J. Carey , Poh-Meng Yeo , Nishta Arora , Leo Sementilli , Victor M. Valenzuela , Erick Romero , Glen I. Harris

show 2 more authors

Margaret Wegener Warwick P. Bowen

This is my paper

classification physics.app-ph

keywords accelerometeroptomechanicssiliconnitridetrampolinepick-and-placebondingtestmassthermomechanicalnoisequalityfactornanomechanicalsensor

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that bonding a dense platinum sphere to a nanomechanical silicon nitride trampoline via pick-and-place assembly creates a chip-scale accelerometer with a much heavier test mass than the device layer alone could provide. This breaks the usual constraint that on-chip test masses are limited by the density and thickness of the fabrication layer. The hybrid device reaches a quality factor of 1900 in air and a thermomechanical acceleration noise floor of 0.8 ng/√Hz. With increasing acoustic and vibration isolation, it measures 5.5 ng/√Hz at 117 Hz, limited by environmental vibrations rather than device noise. The authors claim this is the best peak sensitivity reported for a chip-integrated test mass.

What carries the argument

The central object is the hybrid test mass: a 95 mg platinum sphere bonded by pick-and-place to a silicon nitride trampoline membrane. The trampoline provides a low-dissipation mechanical restoring force, while the high-density sphere adds inertial mass without requiring a thicker or denser device layer. The combination lowers the thermomechanical acceleration noise floor because accelerometer noise scales inversely with the test mass for a given dissipation, and the pick-and-place bond is what decouples mass from fabrication constraints.

What would settle it

Measure the displacement power spectral density of the trampoline-sphere system in vacuum. A rigid hybrid mass should show a single Lorentzian thermomechanical peak with Q ≈ 1900; an extra resonance, an asymmetric peak, or a frequency-dependent damping that cannot be fit by one rigid degree of freedom would show the bond is not rigid and the claimed noise floor is not achievable.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that hybrid test mass integration—bonding an external high-density sphere to a low-dissipation trampoline membrane—enables on-chip accelerometers to exceed the sensitivity set by monolithic device layers. The measured quality factor of 1900 in air with a 95 mg bonded mass gives a thermomechanical acceleration noise of 0.8 ng/√Hz. With vibration isolation, the device shows 5.5 ng/√Hz at 117 Hz, and the residual gap to the noise floor is attributed to environmental vibrations. This establishes the hybrid bonded mass as a workable route to sub-nanog accelerometers on a chip.

Load-bearing premise

The pick-and-place bond between the platinum sphere and the trampoline is rigid enough that the two move as a single test mass, adding mass without adding damping, spurious modes, or alignment error.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Chip accelerometers can reach nanog-level noise floors without vacuum packaging or larger substrates.
Test-mass design is decoupled from fabrication constraints: any dense material can be assembled onto the resonator, not just the device layer.
Pick-and-place bonding could be extended to other nanomechanical sensors where added mass improves sensitivity, such as force or mass sensors.
The measured peak sensitivity is environmentally limited, so better vibration isolation or packaging could directly bring devices closer to the 0.8 ng/√Hz thermomechanical floor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The bonding technique could be pushed to even heavier or denser spheres; the large headroom between the 5.5 ng/√Hz measured peak and the 0.8 ng/√Hz floor suggests environmental isolation is the next real gain.
If the bond proves mechanically reliable outside the lab, this approach could enable small, inexpensive accelerometers with navigation-grade sensitivity in portable devices, where such performance usually requires bulky proof masses.
A testable extension would be to map the crossover from environmental to thermomechanical noise by progressively improving acoustic isolation, directly verifying that the bonded mass stays rigid and lossless to the predicted floor.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this one for the pick-and-place idea: bonding a 95 mg platinum sphere onto a SiN trampoline is a genuinely different way to beat the test-mass scaling limit in chip accelerometers. That alone is worth a look. The reported Q of 1900 in air and the measured 5.5 ng/√Hz peak sensitivity at 117 Hz, if correct, would be a real advance for chip-integrated devices. The fact that the measured sensitivity is limited by environmental vibrations rather than the device noise floor also suggests the thermomechanical floor isn't obviously inflated by fitting.

The soft spot is exactly what the stress-test note flags: the whole thermomechanical sensitivity calculation assumes the bonded sphere moves rigidly with the membrane at the 117 Hz mode, so the effective mass is 95 mg. If the bond is compliant or lossy, the effective mass drops and the real floor rises. The abstract gives no mode-shape verification, no bond stiffness characterization, and no comparison to a monolithic mass. That doesn't make the claim wrong, but it does make the central number an assumption rather than a demonstrated fact.

I also can't check the measurement uncertainties, calibration, or vibration isolation from the abstract—there are no error bars and no methods. So the soundness score has to be provisional. The paper might easily address all of this in the full text—I can't tell from what's in front of me.

Credit where it's due: the integration scheme is new, the claimed record is specific and falsifiable, and the writing is clear enough that the underlying logic is transparent. The pick-and-place step is non-trivial and likely reproducible. If the full paper contains even basic characterization of the mode shape or bond integrity, this is a solid contribution.

Net: I'd send it to peer review rather than desk reject. The central claim matters enough to the subfield to warrant a careful referee who can check the mechanics. I'd also bring it to a reading group—not because I believe every number, but because it's a good example of how to extend a known platform with a clever packaging trick. My guess is the bond is the thing to probe first.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a chip-integrated accelerometer architecture in which a 95 mg platinum sphere is bonded by pick-and-place onto a silicon nitride trampoline membrane, thereby decoupling test mass from the device-layer constraints that limit conventional on-chip accelerometers. The abstract reports a quality factor of 1900 in air, a thermomechanical-noise-limited acceleration sensitivity of 0.8 ng/√Hz, and a measured peak sensitivity of 5.5 ng/√Hz at 117 Hz in air, attributed to environmental vibrations, and claims this is the best peak sensitivity for a chip-integrated test mass.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated, the hybrid test-mass approach would be a meaningful advance for chip-scale accelerometry, potentially closing the sensitivity gap between microelectromechanical and macroscopic devices while retaining a compact, integrated form factor. The use of a high-density bonded sphere is an elegant way to increase proof mass without increasing device footprint. The work also demonstrates a path toward thermomechanically limited operation in air, which is of practical interest. However, the significance hinges entirely on the validity of the single-rigid-body model and on the accuracy of the noise measurement, neither of which can be assessed from the material provided.

major comments (4)

[Abstract] The headline sensitivity values (0.8 ng/√Hz and 5.5 ng/√Hz) are quoted without error bars, measurement bandwidth, or statistical uncertainty. Since the central claim is a record sensitivity, a fair comparison requires a stated measurement protocol, calibration traceability, and an uncertainty analysis. Without these, the claim is not falsifiable.
[Abstract, 'bonding a high-density platinum sphere'] The entire sensitivity derivation rests on the assumption that the pick-and-place bond is rigid enough that the 117 Hz mode is a single degree-of-freedom oscillator with effective mass equal to the full 95 mg. A compliant or viscoelastic bond would introduce additional degrees of freedom, reduce the effective mass participating in the mode, and invalidate the thermomechanical noise floor of 0.8 ng/√Hz. The manuscript must provide mode-shape verification (e.g., finite-element analysis or interferometric mode mapping), bond stiffness characterization, and ideally a comparison with a monolithic or otherwise known-rigid test mass to exclude this possibility.
[Abstract, 'measuring a peak sensitivity of 5.5 ng/√Hz at 117 Hz in air, limited by environmental vibrations'] The claim that the measured peak is limited by environmental vibrations is not supported without a description of the vibration isolation setup, the method used to distinguish environmental noise from sensor self-noise, and the transfer function of the isolation stage. The reader cannot verify that the reported 5.5 ng/√Hz is not an artifact of the measurement apparatus or of an underestimated noise floor.
[Abstract, 'best peak sensitivity reported using a chip-integrated test mass'] The comparative 'best' claim requires a defined baseline of prior art and identical noise-measurement conventions (e.g., bandwidth, calibration, whether the value is peak or average). The abstract gives no list of prior devices, their test-mass masses, or their measured sensitivities, so the record claim is currently unverifiable.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The units 'ng/√Hz' should be defined (nanog per root hertz) at first use, and the measurement frequency should be stated for the thermomechanical noise floor as well as for the peak sensitivity.
[Abstract] The phrase 'hybrid test mass integration' is not standard; a brief clarification of what is 'hybrid' (e.g., bonded sphere on a membrane) would aid readers.
[General] The abstract does not state the quality factor measurement condition (e.g., ring-down vs. bandwidth, whether in air or vacuum) beyond saying 'in air'; this is essential for reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: reported sensitivity is a direct measurement converted by a standard physical model, not a fitted or self-derived quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central performance claims are experimentally determined rather than derived from a parameter fitted to the target quantity. The abstract states that bonding a platinum sphere to a SiN trampoline achieves a measured quality factor of 1900 in air with a 95 mg test mass, and that this corresponds to a thermomechanical-noise-limited acceleration sensitivity of 0.8 ng/√Hz. That correspondence is the standard formula S_a^{1/2} = sqrt(4 k_B T ω0 / (m_eff Q)) evaluated with known temperature, measured frequency, measured Q, and known mass; it is not a prediction that is forced by a fitting procedure. The peak sensitivity of 5.5 ng/√Hz at 117 Hz is itself a direct measurement under vibration isolation. No equation in the provided text defines a quantity in terms of the result it is used to explain, and no load-bearing self-citation or imported uniqueness theorem appears. The concern that the bonded sphere may not behave as a rigid single test mass is a physical validity or engineering limitation, not a circularity: even if that assumption failed, it would mean the measurement does not mean what the authors claim, not that the derivation is equivalent to its inputs. The paper is therefore self-contained with respect to the circularity criteria, and no circular steps are identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are visible from the abstract; the sensitivities are measured or derived from measured Q. Standard thermomechanical noise model and readout sensitivity are assumed. No exotic entities are introduced.

assumptions (2)

domain assumption The acceleration noise floor of an optomechanical accelerometer is set by thermomechanical fluctuations of a damped harmonic oscillator, proportional to sqrt(4 k_B T / (m ω Q)).
Used to convert the measured quality factor and test mass into a stated ng/√Hz sensitivity; not detailed in the abstract, but standard in optomechanics.
domain assumption The optical readout is sensitive enough to resolve thermomechanical motion without adding significant noise.
Implicit in the claim that the 0.8 ng/√Hz noise floor is thermomechanical; cannot be verified from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Precision optomechanical accelerometer via hybrid test mass integration." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UW26XD4W

@misc{pith2026250816088,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Precision optomechanical accelerometer via hybrid test mass integration},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UW26XD4W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16088}
}

abstract

Accelerometers offer motion sensing capabilities across a wide range of areas, enabling navigational awareness in consumer goods and defense applications, and playing a key role in monitoring and control systems. To date, on-chip accelerometers have largely utilized a single device layer or substrate as a test mass. This constrains the test mass to the dimensions and density of the device layer or substrate, ultimately limiting the sensitivity of the device. We demonstrate a new approach which utilizes a pick-and-place bonding technique to increase the test mass of an on-chip accelerometer. By bonding a high-density platinum sphere to a nanomechanical silicon nitride trampoline membrane, we achieve a quality factor of 1900 in air with 95 mg test mass, corresponding to a thermomechanical noise limited acceleration sensitivity of $0.8\,\mathrm{n}g/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$. We optically probe the device's response to applied accelerations with increasing level of acoustic and vibration isolation, measuring a peak sensitivity of $5.5\,\mathrm{n}g/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ at 117 Hz in air, limited by environmental vibrations. This represents the best peak sensitivity reported using a chip-integrated test mass.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Optomechanical Accelerometer Search for Ultralight Dark Matter
hep-ex 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A 39 kHz optomechanical membrane accelerometer was operated at 4 K to search for ultralight vector dark matter, yielding no signal and upper limits weaker than existing equivalence-principle bounds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

Langfelder , author M

author author G. Langfelder , author M. Bestetti ,\ and\ author M. Gadola ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering \ volume 31 ,\ pages 084002 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021
[2]

Ru , author N

author author X. Ru , author N. Gu , author H. Shang ,\ and\ author H. Zhang ,\ @noop journal journal Micromachines \ volume 13 ,\ pages 879 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

work page 2022
[3]

\ Li , author L

author author B.-B. \ Li , author L. Ou , author Y. Lei ,\ and\ author Y.-C. \ Liu ,\ @noop journal journal Nanophotonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 2799 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021
[4]

Fogliano , author B

author author F. Fogliano , author B. Besga , author A. Reigue , author L. Mercier de L \'e pinay , author P. Heringlake , author C. Gouriou , author E. Eyraud , author W. Wernsdorfer , author B. Pigeau ,\ and\ author O. Arcizet ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 4124 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021
[5]

Melcher , author J

author author J. Melcher , author J. Stirling , author F. G. \ Cervantes , author J. R. \ Pratt ,\ and\ author G. A. \ Shaw ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 105 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014
[6]

author author G. I. \ Harris , author D. L. \ McAuslan , author T. M. \ Stace , author A. C. \ Doherty ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 111 ,\ pages 103603 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013
[7]

Basiri-Esfahani , author A

author author S. Basiri-Esfahani , author A. Armin , author S. Forstner ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 10 ,\ pages 132 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

work page 2019
[8]

Integrated optomechanical ultrasonic sensors with nano-Pascal-level sensitivity

author author X. Cao , author H. Yang , author M. Wang , author Z.-G. \ Hu , author Z.-L. \ Wu , author Y. Wang , author J.-F. \ Liu , author X. Zhou , author J. Li , author C. Lao , author Q.-F. \ Yang ,\ and\ author B.-B. \ Li ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20219 title Integrated optomechanical ultrasonic sensors with nano-pascal-level sensitivity ( year...

work page Pith review arXiv 2025

Show all 33 references

[9]

Wang , author W

author author R. Wang , author W. Liu , author Z. Pan , author W. Fan , author L. Liu , author E. Xing , author Y. Zhou , author J. Tang ,\ and\ author J. Liu ,\ @noop journal journal Optics Express \ volume 32 ,\ pages 4816 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[10]

author author L. R. \ McQueen , author N. Bawden , author B. J. \ Carey , author I. Marinkovi \'c , author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ and\ author G. I. \ Harris ,\ @noop journal journal Optics Express \ volume 33 ,\ pages 25910 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025
[11]

Chen , author S

author author Y. Chen , author S. Liu , author G. Hong , author M. Zou , author B. Liu , author J. Luo ,\ and\ author Y. Wang ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces \ volume 14 ,\ pages 39211 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[12]

Forstner , author S

author author S. Forstner , author S. Prams , author J. Knittel , author E. Van Ooijen , author J. Swaim , author G. Harris , author A. Szorkovszky , author W. Bowen ,\ and\ author H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 108 ,\ pages 120...

2012
[13]

Forstner , author E

author author S. Forstner , author E. Sheridan , author J. Knittel , author C. L. \ Humphreys , author G. A. \ Brawley , author H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ @noop journal journal Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) \ volume 26 ,\ pages 6348 ( ye...

2014
[14]

\ Hu , author Y.-M

author author Z.-G. \ Hu , author Y.-M. \ Gao , author J.-F. \ Liu , author H. Yang , author M. Wang , author Y. Lei , author X. Zhou , author J. Li , author X. Cao , author J. Liang , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Light: Science & Applications \ volume 13 ,\ pages 279 ( yea...

2024
[15]

\ Xu , author Y

author author A.-N. \ Xu , author Y. Li , author X. Li , author B. Liu ,\ and\ author Y.-C. \ Liu ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 133 ,\ pages 153601 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[16]

author author A. G. \ Krause , author M. Winger , author T. D. \ Blasius , author Q. Lin ,\ and\ author O. Painter ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2012.245 journal journal Nature Photonics \ volume 6 ,\ pages 768 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

2012 doi
[17]

Zhou , author Y

author author F. Zhou , author Y. Bao , author R. Madugani , author D. A. \ Long , author J. J. \ Gorman ,\ and\ author T. W. \ LeBrun ,\ @noop journal journal Optica \ volume 8 ,\ pages 350 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[18]

Ge , author D

author author C. Ge , author D. Dominguez , author A. Rubenok , author M. Miller ,\ and\ author M. Eichenfield ,\ @noop title Towards navigation-grade and deployable optomechanical accelerometery ( year 2025 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.11751 arXiv:2505.11751 NoStop

2025 arXiv
[19]

author author M. D. \ Chowdhury , author A. R. \ Agrawal ,\ and\ author D. J. \ Wilson ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 19 ,\ pages 024011 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[20]

Li , author W

author author W. Li , author W. Liu , author C. Liu , author Y. Gu , author L. Liu , author Y. Zhou , author E. Xing , author Y. Shi , author J. Tang ,\ and\ author J. Liu ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE Sensors Journal \ ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[21]

Huang , author J

author author Y. Huang , author J. G. \ Flor Flores , author Y. Li , author W. Wang , author D. Wang , author N. Goldberg , author J. Zheng , author M. Yu , author M. Lu , author M. Kutzer , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Laser & Photonics Reviews \ volume 14 ,\ pages 1800329...

2020
[22]

Qu , author P

author author Z. Qu , author P. Lu , author W. Zhang , author D. Liu ,\ and\ author J. Zhang ,\ @noop journal journal Optics Express \ volume 30 ,\ pages 47587 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[23]

Liu , author J

author author Y. Liu , author J. Mummery , author J. Zhou ,\ and\ author M. A. \ Sillanp \"a \"a ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 15 ,\ pages 034004 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

2021
[24]

Tang , author W

author author Z. Tang , author W. Li , author H. Sun , author X. Cai , author T. Li ,\ and\ author Y. Liu ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13398 title Cavity optomechanical probe of gravity between massive mechanical oscillators ( year 2025 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.13398 ar...

2025
[25]

author author J. J. \ Carter , author P. Birckigt , author O. Gerberding ,\ and\ author S. M. \ Koehlenbeck ,\ @noop journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 14 ,\ pages 17775 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[26]

Hines , author A

author author A. Hines , author A. Nelson , author Y. Zhang , author G. Valdes , author J. Sanjuan ,\ and\ author F. Guzman ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 122 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[27]

author author N. J. \ Engelsen , author A. Beccari ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Nanotechnology \ volume 19 ,\ pages 725 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

2024
[28]

Sementilli , author E

author author L. Sementilli , author E. Romero ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ @noop journal journal Advanced Functional Materials \ volume 32 ,\ pages 2105247 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[29]

author author L. G. \ Villanueva \ and\ author S. Schmid ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.227201 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 227201 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

2014 doi
[30]

author author M. J. \ Bereyhi , author A. Beccari , author R. Groth , author S. A. \ Fedorov , author A. Arabmoheghi , author T. J. \ Kippenberg ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Engelsen ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 13 ,\ pages 3097 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

2022
[31]

author author J. R. \ Pratt , author A. R. \ Agrawal , author C. A. \ Condos , author C. M. \ Pluchar , author S. Schlamminger ,\ and\ author D. J. \ Wilson ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review X \ volume 13 ,\ pages 011018 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

2023
[32]

author author A. D. \ Hyatt , author A. R. \ Agrawal , author C. M. \ Pluchar , author C. A. \ Condos ,\ and\ author D. J. \ Wilson ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.02325 \ ( year 2025 ) NoStop

2025 arXiv
[33]

Amick , author M

author author H. Amick , author M. Gendreau , author T. Busch ,\ and\ author C. Gordon ,\ in\ @noop booktitle Buildings for Nanoscale Research and Beyond ,\ Vol.\ volume 5933 \ ( organization SPIE ,\ year 2005 )\ pp.\ pages 16--28 NoStop

2005

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Langfelder , author M

author author G. Langfelder , author M. Bestetti ,\ and\ author M. Gadola ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering \ volume 31 ,\ pages 084002 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021

[2] [2]

Ru , author N

author author X. Ru , author N. Gu , author H. Shang ,\ and\ author H. Zhang ,\ @noop journal journal Micromachines \ volume 13 ,\ pages 879 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

work page 2022

[3] [3]

\ Li , author L

author author B.-B. \ Li , author L. Ou , author Y. Lei ,\ and\ author Y.-C. \ Liu ,\ @noop journal journal Nanophotonics \ volume 10 ,\ pages 2799 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021

[4] [4]

Fogliano , author B

author author F. Fogliano , author B. Besga , author A. Reigue , author L. Mercier de L \'e pinay , author P. Heringlake , author C. Gouriou , author E. Eyraud , author W. Wernsdorfer , author B. Pigeau ,\ and\ author O. Arcizet ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 12 ,\ pages 4124 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

work page 2021

[5] [5]

Melcher , author J

author author J. Melcher , author J. Stirling , author F. G. \ Cervantes , author J. R. \ Pratt ,\ and\ author G. A. \ Shaw ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 105 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

work page 2014

[6] [6]

author author G. I. \ Harris , author D. L. \ McAuslan , author T. M. \ Stace , author A. C. \ Doherty ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ @noop journal journal Physical review letters \ volume 111 ,\ pages 103603 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

work page 2013

[7] [7]

Basiri-Esfahani , author A

author author S. Basiri-Esfahani , author A. Armin , author S. Forstner ,\ and\ author W. P. \ Bowen ,\ @noop journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 10 ,\ pages 132 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Integrated optomechanical ultrasonic sensors with nano-Pascal-level sensitivity

author author X. Cao , author H. Yang , author M. Wang , author Z.-G. \ Hu , author Z.-L. \ Wu , author Y. Wang , author J.-F. \ Liu , author X. Zhou , author J. Li , author C. Lao , author Q.-F. \ Yang ,\ and\ author B.-B. \ Li ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.20219 title Integrated optomechanical ultrasonic sensors with nano-pascal-level sensitivity ( year...

work page Pith review arXiv 2025