Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 85 references

Accurate spontaneous fission half-lives from a microscopic large-scale nuclear structure model

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The BSkG3 nuclear structure model can predict spontaneous fission half-lives across the nuclear chart, and the authors test it against all available experimental data.

desk verdict A promising new application of BSkG3 to spontaneous fission half-lives, but the abstract doesn't support the r-process extrapolation claim; the paper needs careful refereeing on that point. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16240 v1 pith:4MHT4NC3 submitted 2025-08-22 nucl-th

Adrián Sánchez-Fernández , Silvia Bara , Wouter Ryssens , Stéphane Goriely This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-th
keywords spontaneousfissionhalf-livesBSkG3energydensityfunctionalr-processcollectiveinertiaactionminimizationnucleardeformation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the BSkG3 nuclear structure model can predict spontaneous fission half-lives across the whole nuclear chart, not just for a handful of isotopes. To support this, the authors compare every predicted half-life against experimental data for all nuclei that have been measured. This matters because spontaneous fission half-lives are a necessary input for r-process nucleosynthesis calculations, where fission shapes how heavy elements are produced. The model combines ground-state and fission properties, includes triaxial and octupole deformations, uses microscopic collective inertias, and minimizes the fission action, making it practical for large-scale astrophysical applications.

What carries the argument

The central object is the BSkG3 nuclear energy-density functional combined with a semi-classical action-minimization scheme for fission: the nucleus tunnels through the fission barrier along a path in a multi-dimensional collective space that includes triaxial and octupole deformations, and the tunneling rate is computed from the action using microscopic collective inertias obtained by cranking the BSkG3 wave functions. This machinery lets the model go from ground-state structure to spontaneous fission half-lives without ad hoc phenomenological parameters.

What would settle it

A decisive test: measure the spontaneous fission half-life of a yet-unmeasured neutron-rich nucleus whose value BSkG3 extrapolates (for instance, an isotope along the r-process path near the N=184 shell closure), and compare to the prediction; an order-of-magnitude discrepancy would falsify the large-scale accuracy claim. A second check: recompute the same fission actions with a different collective inertia prescription and see whether the half-life distribution moves by orders of magnitude.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper argues that the BSkG3 energy-density-functional model, already successful for ground-state properties across the nuclear chart, also produces accurate spontaneous fission half-lives when the fission path is minimized in a collective space including triaxial and octupole degrees of freedom and the path's action is computed with microscopic collective inertias. The authors test this by comparing every predicted half-life with experimental values for nuclei with measured spontaneous fission half-lives, and on that basis the model is presented as a practical tool for large-scale r-process simulations, where many neutron-rich nuclei are too short-lived to measure but their fission proba

Load-bearing premise

The microscopic action-minimization scheme with BSkG3 collective inertias correctly describes the fission tunneling rate; if that semi-classical path and inertia are unreliable for neutron-rich r-process nuclei, the half-lives will be off even though ground-state properties are well reproduced.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spontaneous fission half-lives can be supplied for thousands of neutron-rich nuclei that no experiment can reach, replacing global phenomenological fits in r-process models.
  • r-process simulations that include fission recycling will adopt these half-lives as inputs, potentially shifting predicted heavy-element abundances and the actinide production peaks.
  • The same theoretical framework—action minimization with microscopic inertias—can be applied to beta-delayed fission and to fission fragment distribution, extending the model to other stages of the r-process.
  • The comparison against all available experimental half-lives establishes a benchmark that other energy-density functionals must meet if they claim large-scale fission predictive power.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension would be to use the same BSkG3 action-minimization machinery to compute beta-delayed fission probabilities, which are also needed in r-process simulations and currently rely on more empirical barriers.
  • The method's sensitivity to the collective inertia is not quantified in the abstract; a systematic comparison of the cranking inertia with other inertia prescriptions would reveal whether the half-life predictions are stable or parameter-sensitive in extrapolation.
  • If the large-scale accuracy holds, the same theoretical input might be used to refine mass and charge distributions of fission fragments, which the authors do not address but which determine the final abundance pattern, not just the half-lives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the BSkG3 nuclear structure model can predict large-scale fission properties, in particular spontaneous fission half-lives relevant to the r-process. The abstract states that the model's accuracy is assessed by comparing predicted and experimental half-lives for all nuclei with available data, and credits the combination of BSkG3 ground-state and fission predictive power, triaxial and octupole degrees of freedom, microscopic collective inertias, and action minimization for making the approach practical for large-scale astrophysical applications.

Significance. If the claim is established, the work would be a valuable step toward modeling fission in r-process nucleosynthesis, where spontaneous fission half-lives of neutron-rich nuclei are largely unknown and cannot be measured in the near term. The proposed framework is methodologically ambitious and could provide a practical alternative to fully microscopic time-dependent methods. However, the abstract as written provides no quantitative evidence for the central claim: no numbers, no goodness-of-fit statistics, no uncertainty quantification, no list of nuclei, and no description of the half-life formula or action-minimization details. The significance is therefore conditional on details that are not visible in the available text.

major comments (4)
  1. [Abstract, first sentence] The central claim of 'accurate' prediction is not supported by any quantitative measure. The abstract states that predicted and experimental values are compared for all nuclei with available data, but does not report the number of nuclei, the residual distribution, the rms deviation, or any correlation coefficient. Without such statistics, the reader cannot assess whether the agreement is meaningful or merely approximate.
  2. [Abstract, first sentence / second sentence] The validation set consists exactly of nuclei with available data, which are predominantly in the measured region of the nuclear chart. The stated payoff is modeling the r-process, where the nuclei of interest are unmeasured and neutron-rich. Since the abstract does not state whether the half-lives themselves were used in any way to constrain the model, the extrapolation claim is unsupported. The paper should explicitly state that the BSkG3 functional is fitted only to other nuclear data, and ideally provide out-of-sample validation on subsets of measured nuclei (e.g., withholding a random or charge-selected sample) to give confidence in extrapolation.
  3. [Abstract, fourth sentence] The description of the method is too vague to be assessed. The terms 'microscopic collective inertias,' 'triaxial and octupole degrees of freedom,' and 'minimization of the action' are mentioned, but the abstract does not specify the action functional, the number and form of the collective coordinates, the path optimization procedure, or how the inertias are computed from BSkG3. These details are load-bearing because the reliability of spontaneous fission half-lives depends critically on the action and inertia. The full text must provide these definitions for the claim to be verifiable.
  4. [Abstract, third sentence] No uncertainty quantification is provided. Spontaneous fission half-lives can vary by orders of magnitude with small changes in the fission barrier or collective inertia. The abstract's claim of accuracy would be meaningful only if accompanied by an estimate of the model's uncertainty, including at least a discussion of the sensitivity to the Skyrme parameters, the inertia model, and the action-minimization approximation. Without this, the predictive power for unmeasured nuclei is unquantified.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract, fourth sentence] The phrase 'sophisticated yet practical' is subjective and could be replaced by an explicit statement of the computational cost or a comparison with existing large-scale models.
  2. [General] No references are given in the abstract, even though BSkG3 is a specific model. A citation to the BSkG3 papers and to prior large-scale fission calculations would help place the work in context.
  3. [Abstract, first sentence] The scope 'large-scale fission properties' is broader than the focus on spontaneous fission half-lives; the abstract should clarify what other fission properties are predicted or leave this as an introduction to the paper's scope.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the provided abstract; the half-life comparison appears to be an out-of-sample test.

full rationale

The abstract presents BSkG3 as a pre-existing microscopic nuclear structure model that is used to predict spontaneous fission half-lives, which are then compared to experimental values for all nuclei with available data. Nothing in the provided text indicates that the half-lives or fission barriers were themselves fit inputs to the model. The model's parameters were presumably constrained in earlier work on ground-state properties, making the fission half-life predictions a nontrivial, out-of-sample check. No equations, fit procedures, or self-citations are available in the excerpt to exhibit a specific reduction of a prediction to an input. The absence of an explicit statement that the half-lives were not in the fit is a matter of transparency, not a demonstrated circular step. Therefore, no circularity can be substantiated from the evidence provided.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The abstract introduces no new entities and no new free parameters. The central claim rests on previously fitted BSkG3 parameters and on the semi-classical action-minimization framework, which are upstream assumptions not paid for in the abstract. Without the full paper, the exact list of fitted constants, such as any normalization of the half-life formula, cannot be enumerated.

free parameters (1)
  • BSkG3 Skyrme functional parameters = not specified in abstract (fitted in prior work)
    The central prediction depends on the parameters of the BSkG3 energy density functional, which were adjusted to nuclear data before this study. Any residual fittedness in those parameters carries into the half-life predictions.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Semi-classical action-minimization description of spontaneous fission tunneling
    The abstract says half-lives are obtained by minimization of the action, which presumes a semi-classical tunneling path and a well-defined collective inertia. This is a standard but non-trivial modeling assumption.
  • domain assumption The experimental dataset of spontaneous fission half-lives is complete and accurate for all nuclei with available data
    The validation is relative to this dataset. If the set is incomplete or the experimental uncertainties are large, the reported agreement is correspondingly affected.
  • domain assumption BSkG3 predictive power for ground-state and fission properties holds outside the region used to fit the functional
    The claim of large-scale predictivity assumes the functional generalizes from fitted regions to exotic r-process nuclei where no data exist.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Accurate spontaneous fission half-lives from a microscopic large-scale nuclear structure model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4MHT4NC3

@misc{pith2026250816240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Accurate spontaneous fission half-lives from a microscopic large-scale nuclear structure model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4MHT4NC3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16240}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate the ability of the BSkG3 model to predict large-scale fission properties. In particular, we focus on the description of spontaneous fission half-lives, which are crucial for modeling the r-process. To assess the model accuracy, we compare predicted and experimental values for all nuclei with available data. The combination of BSkG3 predictive power for ground state and fission properties, the inclusion of triaxial and octupole degrees of freedom, the use of microscopic collective inertias, and the minimization of the action make our approach sophisticated yet practical when it comes to large-scale astrophysical applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [2]

    Bender, R

    M. Bender, R. Bernard, G. Bertsch, S. Chiba, J. Dobaczewski, N. Dubray, S. A. Giuliani, K. Hagino, D. Lacroix, Z. Li, P. Magierski, J. Maruhn, W. Nazarewicz, J. Pei, S. Péru, N. Pillet, J. Randrup, D. Regnier, P.-G. Reinhard, L. M. Robledo, W. Ryssens, J. Sadhukhan, G. Scamps, N. Schunck, C. Simenel, J. Skalski, I. Stetcu, P. Stevenson, S. Umar, M. Verrie...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6471/abab4f 2020

  2. [3]

    Schunck, D

    N. Schunck, D. Regnier, Theory of nuclear fission, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 125 (2022) 103963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103963 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2022.103963

    arXiv 2022

  3. [4]

    Charisopoulos, S

    S. Charisopoulos, S. Courtin, J. G. Camacho, K. Johnston, M. Lewitowicz, F. de Oliveira, N. P. Barradas, D. Ridikas, V. Wagne, Nuclear Physics in everyday life, NuPECC, 2022

    2022

  4. [5]

    Aliberti, G

    G. Aliberti, G. Palmiotti, M. Salvatores, T. K. Kim, T. A. Taiwo, M. Anitescu, I. Kodeli, E. Sartori, J. C. Bosq, J. Tommasi, Nuclear data sensitivity, uncertainty and target accuracy assessment for future nuclear systems, Annals of Nuclear Energy 33 (8) (2006) 700--733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.003 doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2006.02.003 2006

  5. [6]

    Sartori, Nuclear data for radioactive waste management, Annals of Nuclear Energy 62 (2013) 579--589

    E. Sartori, Nuclear data for radioactive waste management, Annals of Nuclear Energy 62 (2013) 579--589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2013.02.003 doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.02.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2013.02.003 2013

  6. [7]

    Nazarewicz, The limits of nuclear mass and charge, Nature Physics 14 (6) (2018) 537--541

    W. Nazarewicz, The limits of nuclear mass and charge, Nature Physics 14 (6) (2018) 537--541. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0163-3 doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0163-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0163-3 2018

  7. [8]

    S. A. Giuliani, Z. Matheson, W. Nazarewicz, E. Olsen, P.-G. Reinhard, J. Sadhukhan, B. Schuetrumpf, N. Schunck, P. Schwerdtfeger, Colloquium: Superheavy elements: Oganesson and beyond, Reviews of Modern Physics 91 (1) (2019) 011001. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.011001 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.91.011001

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.91.011001 2019

  8. [9]

    A. A. Sonzogni, T. D. Johnson, E. A. McCutchan, Nuclear structure insights into reactor antineutrino spectra, Physical Review C 91 (1) (2015) 011301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.011301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.91.011301

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.91.011301 2015

Show all 85 references
  1. [10]

    A. A. Sonzogni, E. A. McCutchan, A. C. Hayes, Dissecting Reactor Antineutrino Flux Calculations , Physical Review Letters 119 (11) (2017) 112501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.112501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.112501

    2017 doi

  2. [11]

    K. H. Schmidt, M. Estienne, M. Fallot, S. Cormon, A. Cucoanes, T. Shiba, B. Jurado, K. Kern, Ch . Schmitt, Extensive Study of the Quality of Fission Yields from Experiment , Evaluation and GEF for Antineutrino Studies and Applications , Nuclear Data Sheets 173 (2021) 54--117. ...

    2021 doi

  3. [12]

    Arnould, S

    M. Arnould, S. Goriely, Astronuclear Physics : A Tale of the Atomic Nuclei in the Skies , Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 112 (2020) 103766. http://arxiv.org/abs/2001.11228 arXiv:2001.11228 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103766 doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2020.103766

    2020 arXiv

  4. [13]

    Mart \'i nez-Pinedo , D

    G. Mart \'i nez-Pinedo , D. Mocelj, N. T. Zinner, A. Keli \'c , K. Langanke, I. Panov, B. Pfeiffer, T. Rauscher, K. H. Schmidt, F. K. Thielemann, The role of fission in the r-process, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 59 (1) (2007) 199--205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pp...

    2007 doi

  5. [14]

    Goriely, The fundamental role of fission during r-process nucleosynthesis in neutron star mergers, The European Physical Journal A 51 (2) (2015) 22

    S. Goriely, The fundamental role of fission during r-process nucleosynthesis in neutron star mergers, The European Physical Journal A 51 (2) (2015) 22. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2015-15022-3 doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15022-3

    2015 doi

  6. [15]

    B. D. Metzger, G. Mart \'i nez-Pinedo , S. Darbha, E. Quataert, A. Arcones, D. Kasen, R. Thomas, P. Nugent, I. V. Panov, N. T. Zinner, Electromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astr...

    2010

  7. [16]

    S. A. Giuliani, G. Mart \'i nez-Pinedo , M.-R. Wu, L. M. Robledo, Fission and the r-process nucleosynthesis of translead nuclei in neutron star mergers, Physical Review C 102 (4) (2020) 045804. http://arxiv.org/abs/1904.03733 arXiv:1904.03733 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC...

    2020 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Hergert, A Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory , Frontiers in Physics 8 (2020) 379

    H. Hergert, A Guided Tour of ab initio Nuclear Many-Body Theory , Frontiers in Physics 8 (2020) 379. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2020.00379 doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.00379

    2020

  9. [18]

    Pomorski, J

    K. Pomorski, J. Dudek, Nuclear liquid-drop model and surface-curvature effects https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.044316, Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003) 044316. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.044316 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.67.044316 . ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.044316

    2003 doi

  10. [19]

    Goriely, N

    S. Goriely, N. Chamel, J. M. Pearson, Hartree- Fock-Bogoliubov nuclear mass model with 0.50 MeV accuracy based on standard forms of Skyrme and pairing functionals, Physical Review C 88 (6) (2013) 061302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.061302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.061302

    2013 doi

  11. [20]

    Scamps, S

    G. Scamps, S. Goriely, E. Olsen, M. Bender, W. Ryssens, Skyrme- Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass models on a 3D mesh: Effect of triaxial shape, The European Physical Journal A 57 (12) (2021) 333. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00642-1 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00642-1

    2021 doi

  12. [21]

    Delaroche, M

    J.-P. Delaroche, M. Girod, H. Goutte, J. Libert, Structure properties of even- even actinides at normal and super deformed shapes analysed using the gogny force, Nucl. Phys. A 771 (2006) 103

    2006

  13. [22]

    Marevi \'c , N

    P. Marevi \'c , N. Schunck, J. Randrup, R. Vogt, Angular Momentum of Fission Fragments from Microscopic Theory , Physical Review C 104 (2) (2021) L021601. http://arxiv.org/abs/2101.03406 arXiv:2101.03406 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L021601 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.L021601

    2021 arXiv

  14. [23]

    Bulgac, I

    A. Bulgac, I. Abdurrahman, K. Godbey, I. Stetcu, Fragment Intrinsic Spins and Fragments ' Relative Orbital Angular Momentum in Nuclear Fission , Physical Review Letters 128 (2) (2022) 022501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022501 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022501

    2022 doi

  15. [24]

    Randrup, S

    J. Randrup, S. E. Larsson, P. M \"o ller, S. G. Nilsson, K. Pomorski, A. Sobiczewski, Spontaneous-fission half-lives for even nuclei with \ Z ensuremath\ ge\ 92\ , Phys. Rev. C 13 (1) (1976) 229--239. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.13.229 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.13.229

    1976 doi

  16. [25]

    M \"o ller, A

    P. M \"o ller, A. J. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, A. Iwamoto, R. Bengtsson, H. Uhrenholt, S. berg, Heavy-element fission barriers, Physical Review C 79 (6) (2009) 064304. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064304 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.79.064304

    2009 doi

  17. [26]

    X. Bao, H. Zhang, G. Royer, J. Li, Spontaneous fission half-lives of heavy and superheavy nuclei within a generalized liquid drop model, Nuclear Physics A 906 (2013) 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.03.002 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2013.03.002

    2013 doi

  18. [27]

    M \"o ller, A

    P. M \"o ller, A. Sierk, T. Ichikawa, H. Sagawa, Nuclear ground-state masses and deformations: FRDM (2012), Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 109--110 (2016) 1--204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002 doi:10.1016/j.adt.2015.10.002

    2012 doi

  19. [28]

    Blanco, A

    J. Blanco, A. Dobrowolski, A. Zdeb, J. Bartel, Spontaneous fission half-lives of actinides and superheavy elements https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044618, Phys. Rev. C 108 (2023) 044618. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044618 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.108.044618 ...

    2023 doi

  20. [29]

    Grams, W

    G. Grams, W. Ryssens, S. Scamps, G. Goriely, N. Chamel, Skyrme-hartree-fock-bogoliubov mass models on a 3d mesh: Iii. from atomic nuclei to neutron stars, Eur. Phys. J. A 59 (2023) 270

    2023

  21. [30]

    Moller, J

    P. Moller, J. R. Nix, Stability of heavy and superheavy elements, Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics 20 (11) (1994) 1681. https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/20/11/003 doi:10.1088/0954-3899/20/11/003

    1994 doi

  22. [31]

    Samyn, S

    M. Samyn, S. Goriely, M. Bender, J. M. Pearson, Further explorations of Skyrme-Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov mass formulas. III . Role of particle-number projection, Physical Review C 70 (4) (2004) 044309. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044309 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.70.044309

    2004 doi

  23. [32]

    Capote, M

    R. Capote, M. Herman, P. Oblo z insk \'y , P. Young, S. Goriely, T. Belgya, A. Ignatyuk, A. Koning, S. Hilaire, V. Plujko, M. Avrigeanu, O. Bersillon, M. Chadwick, T. Fukahori, Z. Ge, Y. Han, S. Kailas, J. Kopecky, V. Maslov, G. Reffo, M. Sin, E.Sh . Soukhovitskii, P. Talou, R...

    2009 doi

  24. [33]

    Ryssens, G

    W. Ryssens, G. Scamps, S. Goriely, M. Bender, Skyrme-- Hartree -- Fock -- Bogoliubov mass models on a 3d mesh: IIb . fission properties of BSkG2 , The European Physical Journal A 59 (5) (2023) 96

    2023

  25. [34]

    Ryssens, G

    W. Ryssens, G. Scamps, S. Goriely, M. Bender, Skyrme-- Hartree -- Fock -- Bogoliubov mass models on a 3D mesh: II . Time-reversal symmetry breaking, The European Physical Journal A 58 (12) (2022) 246. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00894-5 doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00894-5

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    Grams, N

    G. Grams, N. N. Shchechilin, A. S \'a nchez-Fern \'a ndez, W. Ryssens, N. Chamel, S. Goriely, Skyrme--hartree--fock--bogoliubov mass models on a 3d mesh: Iv. improved description of the isospin dependence of pairing, The European Physical Journal A 61 (2) (2025) 1--13

    2025

  27. [36]

    S. Jin, K. J. Roche, I. Stetcu, I. Abdurrahman, A. Bulgac, The LISE package: Solvers for static and time-dependent superfluid local density approximation equations in three dimensions, Computer Physics Communications 269 (2021) 108130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108130...

    2021

  28. [37]

    Brack, J

    M. Brack, J. Damgaard, A. S. Jensen, H. C. Pauli, V. M. Strutinsky, C. Y. Wong, Funny hills: The shell-correction approach to nuclear shell effects and its applications to the fission process https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.44.320, Rev. Mod. Phys. 44 (1972) 320--40...

    1972 doi

  29. [38]

    Baran, Some dynamical aspects of the fission process https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269378900850, Physics Letters B 76 (1) (1978) 8--10

    A. Baran, Some dynamical aspects of the fission process https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269378900850, Physics Letters B 76 (1) (1978) 8--10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(78)90085-0 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(78)90085-0 . :/...

    1978

  30. [39]

    Schunck, L

    N. Schunck, L. M. Robledo, Microscopic theory of nuclear fission: a review https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301, Reports on Progress in Physics 79 (11) (2016) 116301. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301 doi:10.1088/0034-4885/79/11/116301 . ://dx.doi.org...

    2016 doi

  31. [40]

    R. N. Perez, N. Schunck, R. D. Lasseri, C. Zhang, J. Sarich, Axially deformed solution of the Skyrme -- Hartree -- Fock -- Bogolyubov equations using the transformed harmonic oscillator basis ( III ) hfbtho (v3.00): A new version of the program, Computer Physics Communications...

    2017 doi

  32. [41]

    Berger, M

    J. Berger, M. Girod, D. Gogny, Constrained hartree-fock and beyond https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375947489906568, Nuclear Physics A 502 (1989) 85--104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(89)90656-8 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(89)90...

    1989

  33. [42]

    \'C wiok, J

    S. \'C wiok, J. Dobaczewski, P. H. Heenen, P. Magierski, W. Nazarewicz, Shell structure of the superheavy elements, Nuclear Physics A 611 (2) (1996) 211--246. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00337-5 doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(96)00337-5

    1996 doi

  34. [43]

    Bender, K

    M. Bender, K. Rutz, P.-G. Reinhard, J. A. Maruhn, W. Greiner, Potential energy surfaces of superheavy nuclei, Physical Review C 58 (4) (1998) 2126--2132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.2126 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.58.2126

    1998 doi

  35. [44]

    B \"u rvenich, M

    T. B \"u rvenich, M. Bender, J. A. Maruhn, P.-G. Reinhard, Systematics of fission barriers in superheavy elements, Physical Review C 69 (1) (2004) 014307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.69.014307 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.69.014307

    2004 doi

  36. [45]

    Staszczak, A

    A. Staszczak, A. Baran, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, Microscopic description of complex nuclear decay: Multimodal fission https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.014309, Phys. Rev. C 80 (2009) 014309. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.014309 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.80.01...

    2009 doi

  37. [46]

    Abusara, A

    H. Abusara, A. V. Afanasjev, P. Ring, Fission barriers in actinides in covariant density functional theory: The role of triaxiality https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.044303, Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 044303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.044303 doi:10.1103/PhysRe...

    2010 doi

  38. [47]

    Rodr\' guez-Guzm\'an, L

    R. Rodr\' guez-Guzm\'an, L. M. Robledo, Microscopic description of fission in uranium isotopes with the gogny energy density functional https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.054310, Phys. Rev. C 89 (2014) 054310. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.89.054310 doi:10.1103/Ph...

    2014 doi

  39. [48]

    Schunck, D

    N. Schunck, D. Duke, H. Carr, A. Knoll, Description of induced nuclear fission with skyrme energy functionals: Static potential energy surfaces and fission fragment properties https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.054305, Phys. Rev. C 90 (2014) 054305. https://doi.org/1...

    2014 doi

  40. [49]

    Baran, M

    A. Baran, M. Kowal, P.-G. Reinhard, L. Robledo, A. Staszczak, M. Warda, Fission barriers and probabilities of spontaneous fission for elements with z 100 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037594741500130X, Nuclear Physics A 944 (2015) 442--470, special Issue o...

    2015 doi

  41. [50]

    S. A. Giuliani, L. M. Robledo, Non-perturbative collective inertias for fission: A comparative study https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269318308165, Physics Letters B 787 (2018) 134--140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.045 doi:h...

    2018 doi

  42. [51]

    Bernard, S

    R. Bernard, S. A. Giuliani, L. M. Robledo, Role of dynamic pairing correlations in fission dynamics https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064301, Phys. Rev. C 99 (2019) 064301. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064301 . ://link.aps.org/d...

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    Ryssens, M

    W. Ryssens, M. Bender, K. Bennaceur, P.-H. Heenen, J. Meyer, Impact of the surface energy coefficient on the deformation properties of atomic nuclei as predicted by Skyrme energy density functionals, Physical Review C 99 (4) (2019) 044315. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.0...

    2019 doi

  44. [53]

    Scamps, C

    G. Scamps, C. Simenel, Effect of shell structure on the fission of sub-lead nuclei https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.041602, Phys. Rev. C 100 (2019) 041602. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.041602 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.041602 . ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/Ph...

    2019 doi

  45. [54]

    S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, D. Ray, P. Ring, Assessing theoretical uncertainties in fission barriers of superheavy nuclei, Physical Review C 95 (5) (2017) 054324. http://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06334 arXiv:1704.06334 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.054324 doi:10.1103/Phy...

    2017 arXiv

  46. [55]

    Taninah, S

    A. Taninah, S. E. Agbemava, A. V. Afanasjev, Covariant density functional theory input for r -process simulations in actinides and superheavy nuclei: The ground state and fission properties, Physical Review C 102 (5) (2020) 054330. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.054330 d...

    2020 doi

  47. [56]

    S. A. E. Johansson, Nuclear octupole deformation and the mechanism of fission, Nuclear Physics 22 (4) (1961) 529--552

    1961

  48. [57]

    Ryssens, Symmetry breaking in nuclear mean-field models, PhD Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2016

    W. Ryssens, Symmetry breaking in nuclear mean-field models, PhD Thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 2016

    2016

  49. [58]

    Ryssens, P.-H

    W. Ryssens, P.-H. Heenen, M. Bender, Numerical accuracy of mean-field calculations in coordinate space, Physical Review C 92 (6) (2015) 064318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.064318 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.92.064318

    2015 doi

  50. [59]

    Baran, J

    A. Baran, J. A. Sheikh, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, A. Staszczak, Quadrupole collective inertia in nuclear fission: Cranking approximation https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054321, Phys. Rev. C 84 (2011) 054321. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054321 doi:10.1...

    2011 doi

  51. [60]

    S. A. Giuliani, L. M. Robledo, Non-perturbative collective inertias for fission: A comparative study, Physics Letters B 787 (2018) 134--140. http://arxiv.org/abs/1808.01712 arXiv:1808.01712 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.045 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2018.10.045

    2018 arXiv

  52. [61]

    Sadhukhan, K

    J. Sadhukhan, K. Mazurek, A. Baran, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, J. A. Sheikh, Spontaneous fission lifetimes from the minimization of self-consistent collective action, Phys. Rev. C 88 (6) (2013) 064314. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064314 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064314

    2013 doi

  53. [62]

    Sadhukhan, W

    J. Sadhukhan, W. Nazarewicz, N. Schunck, Microscopic modeling of mass and charge distributions in the spontaneous fission of Pu 240, Physical Review C 93 (1) (2016) 011304. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.011304 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.93.011304

    2016 doi

  54. [63]

    Flynn, D

    E. Flynn, D. Lay, S. Agbemava, P. Giuliani, K. Godbey, W. Nazarewicz, J. Sadhukhan, Nudged elastic band approach to nuclear fission pathways, Physical Review C 105 (5) (2022) 054302. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054302 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.105.054302

    2022 doi

  55. [64]

    Matheson, S

    Z. Matheson, S. A. Giuliani, W. Nazarewicz, J. Sadhukhan, N. Schunck, Cluster radioactivity of ^ 294 _ 118 Og _ 176 , Physical Review C 99 (4) (2019) 041304. http://arxiv.org/abs/1812.06490 arXiv:1812.06490 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.041304 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.041304

    2019 arXiv

  56. [65]

    Goriely, M

    S. Goriely, M. Samyn, J. M. Pearson, Further explorations of skyrme-hartree-fock-bogoliubov mass formulas. vii. simultaneous fits to masses and fission barriers https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.064312, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 064312. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC...

    2007 doi

  57. [66]

    S. A. Giuliani, G. Mart\' nez-Pinedo, L. M. Robledo, Fission properties of superheavy nuclei for r -process calculations https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034323, Phys. Rev. C 97 (2018) 034323. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.034323 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.03432...

    2018 doi

  58. [67]

    Kondev, M

    F. Kondev, M. Wang, W. Huang, S. Naimi, G. Audi, The nubase2020 evaluation of nuclear physics properties * https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae, Chinese Physics C 45 (3) (2021) 030001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1137/abddae doi:10.1088/1674-1137/abddae . ://dx.doi.org...

    2021 doi

  59. [68]

    Sánchez-Fernández, et al

    A. Sánchez-Fernández, et al. , In preparation (2025)

    2025

  60. [69]

    R. N. Bernard, N. Pillet, L. M. Robledo, M. Anguiano, Description of the asymmetric to symmetric fission transition in the neutron-deficient thorium isotopes: Role of the tensor force https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044615, Phys. Rev. C 101 (2020) 044615. https:/...

    2020 doi

  61. [70]

    Erler, K

    J. Erler, K. Langanke, H. P. Loens, G. Mart \'i nez-Pinedo , P.-G. Reinhard, Fission properties for r -process nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2) (2012) 025802. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.025802 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.025802

    2012 doi

  62. [71]

    Sadhukhan, J

    J. Sadhukhan, J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz, J. A. Sheikh, A. Baran, Pairing-induced speedup of nuclear spontaneous fission, Phys. Rev. C 90 (6) (2014) 061304. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.061304 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.90.061304

    2014 doi

  63. [72]

    Zhao, B.-N

    J. Zhao, B.-N. Lu, T. Nik s i \'c , D. Vretenar, S.-G. Zhou, Multidimensionally-constrained relativistic mean-field study of spontaneous fission: Coupling between shape and pairing degrees of freedom, Phys. Rev. C 93 (4) (2016) 044315. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.04431...

    2016 doi

  64. [73]

    Rodr guez-Guzm \'a n , L

    R. Rodr guez-Guzm \'a n , L. M. Robledo, Microscopic description of fission in odd-mass uranium and plutonium nuclei with the Gogny energy density functional, Eur. Phys. J. A 53 (12) (2017) 245. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2017-12444-9 doi:10.1140/epja/i2017-12444-9

    2017 doi

  65. [74]

    Lema \^i tre, S

    J.-F. Lema \^i tre, S. Goriely, S. Hilaire, N. Dubray, Microscopic description of the fission path with the Gogny interaction, Phys. Rev. C 98 (2) (2018) 024623. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024623 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.024623

    2018 doi

  66. [75]

    Rodr \'i guez-Guzm \'a n , L

    R. Rodr \'i guez-Guzm \'a n , L. M. Robledo, Least action description of spontaneous fission in fermium and nobelium nuclei based on the Gogny energy density functional, Phys. Rev. C 98 (3) (2018) 034308. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034308 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.98.034308

    2018 doi

  67. [76]

    Baldo, L

    M. Baldo, L. M. Robledo, P. Schuck, X. Vi \ n as, New Kohn-Sham density functional based on microscopic nuclear and neutron matter equations of state, Phys. Rev. C 87 (6) (2013) 064305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064305 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.87.064305

    2013 doi

  68. [77]

    Baran, K

    A. Baran, K. Pomorski, A. Lukasiak, A. Sobiczewski, A dynamic analysis of spontaneous-fission half-lives, Nuclear Physics A 361 (1) (1981) 83--101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(81)90471-1 doi:10.1016/0375-9474(81)90471-1

    1981 doi

  69. [78]

    Z. Yuan, D. Bai, Z. Wang, Z. Ren, Improved formulas of spontaneous fission half-lives for heavy and superheavy nuclei, The European Physical Journal A 60 (3) (2024) 68. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01280-z doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-024-01280-z

    2024 doi

  70. [79]

    Jodon, M

    R. Jodon, M. Bender, K. Bennaceur, J. Meyer, Constraining the surface properties of effective Skyrme interactions, Phys. Rev. C 94 (2) (2016) 024335. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024335 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.94.024335

    2016 doi

  71. [80]

    Bulgac, M

    A. Bulgac, M. M. Forbes, S. Jin, R. N. Perez, N. Schunck, Minimal nuclear energy density functional, Phys. Rev. C 97 (4) (2018) 044313. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044313 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.97.044313

    2018 doi

  72. [81]

    X. Guan, Y. Xin, Y.-J. Chen, X.-Z. Wu, Z.-X. Li, Impact of pairing interactions on fission in the deformed mean-field plus standard pairing model, Phys. Rev. C 104 (4) (2021) 044329. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.044329 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.104.044329

    2021 doi

  73. [82]

    Da Costa, K

    P. Da Costa, K. Bennaceur, J. Meyer, W. Ryssens, M. Bender, On the impact of the scheme for center-of-mass correction on the surface energy of Skyrme Energy Density Functionals (Oct. 2023)

    2023

  74. [83]

    Rodr\' guez-Guzm\'an, L

    R. Rodr\' guez-Guzm\'an, L. M. Robledo, Role of dynamic pairing correlations in fission dynamics. ii. fermium and nobelium isotopes https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024335, Phys. Rev. C 106 (2022) 024335. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.024335 doi:10.1103/Phy...

    2022 doi

  75. [84]

    D. Lay, E. Flynn, S. A. Giuliani, W. Nazarewicz, L. Neufcourt, Neural network emulation of spontaneous fission, Physical Review C 109 (4) (2024) 044305. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.044305 doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.044305

    2024 doi

  76. [85]

    Koning, S

    A. Koning, S. Hilaire, S. Goriely, Talys: modeling of nuclear reactions, The European Physical Journal A 59 (6) (2023) 131

    2023

  77. [86]

    International Atomic Energy Agency , IAEA LiveChart of Nuclides , https://www-nds.iaea.org/relnsd/vcharthtml/VChartHTML.html

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.