pith. sign in

arxiv: 2508.16471 · v3 · submitted 2025-08-22 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Modeling of Far-Field Quantum Coherence by Dielectric Bodies Based on the Volume Integral Equation Method

Chengnian Huang , Hangyu Ge , Yijia Cheng , Zi He , Feng Liu , Wei E. I. Sha This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-18 21:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords Hong-Ou-Mandel effecttwo-photon interferencevolume integral equationdielectric scatterersfar-field correlationsmetasurfacequantum coherencescattering formulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A scattering formulation extracts two-photon far-field correlations for arbitrary lossless dielectrics from classical volume-integral solutions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a unified framework that computes angle-resolved second-order photon correlations by mapping two input channels to two far-field detection modes through a compact transfer relation. Transfer coefficients are obtained directly from classical far-field complex amplitudes produced by an FFT-accelerated volume integral equation solver, eliminating the need for perfectly matched layers or separate near-to-far transformations. Validation on dielectric spheres reproduces known analytical results, while application to a Pancharatnam-Berry-phase metasurface shows that angular selection strongly modulates Hong-Ou-Mandel dip visibility.

Core claim

The required transfer coefficients are extracted from classical far-field complex amplitudes computed by an FFT-accelerated volume integral equation solver, yielding a compact two-channel transfer relation for the second-order correlation function and time-domain coincidence counts.

What carries the argument

Multi-channel scattering formulation that maps two populated incident channels to two selected far-field detection modes.

If this is right

  • Angle-resolved two-photon interference patterns become computable for scatterers of arbitrary shape.
  • HOM-dip visibility can be predicted as a direct function of chosen far-field observation angles.
  • The same classical amplitudes support both single-photon and two-photon statistics without separate quantum solvers.
  • Quantum state engineering with dielectric bodies is possible by optimizing the scatterer geometry for target correlation functions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be inverted to design metasurfaces that produce prescribed angular quantum correlations.
  • Extension to absorbing or nonlinear materials would require only replacing the classical solver while keeping the same transfer extraction.
  • The approach naturally connects to inverse-design loops for quantum photonic devices that incorporate scattering elements.

Load-bearing premise

The multi-channel scattering map from two incident channels to two far-field detection modes remains valid for arbitrary lossless dielectric scatterers without extra near-field or loss approximations.

What would settle it

Compute the coincidence counts for a dielectric sphere with the numerical solver and compare them directly to the known analytical Hong-Ou-Mandel dip curve; mismatch at any angle would falsify the extraction step.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.16471 by Chengnian Huang, Feng Liu, Hangyu Ge, Wei E. I. Sha, Yijia Cheng, Zi He.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The schematic of the photon detection setup, where two detectors are placed at positions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Normalized second-order correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The angular map of the normalized fourth-order correlation of fields. (a) classical scattering. (b) quantum [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Four representative detection positions in the angular map: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) The geometric schematic of the metasurface unit cell. (b) The schematic of the two-photon state and the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Normalized second-order correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normalized coincidence counts N˜ c between the two detection positions for a variation of the initial photon time delay δτ . fixing the azimuthal angles of detectors ϕ1 = 180◦ , ϕ2 = 0◦ , the Figs. 6(a) and (b) respectively show the numerical results of g (2) LR (θ1, θ2) as a function of θ2 with θ1 fixed at −10◦ , and as a function of θ1 with θ2 fixed at 10◦ . It can be observed that a vanishing correlatio… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Hong-Ou-Mandel (HOM) effect is a hallmark of nonclassical two-photon interference. This paper develops a unified theory-numerics framework to compute angle-resolved far-field two-photon correlations from arbitrary lossless dielectric scatterers. We describe the input-output relation using a multi-channel scattering formulation that maps two populated incident channels to two selected far-field detection modes, yielding a compact two-channel transfer relation for second-order correlation function and time-domain coincidence counts. The required transfer coefficients are extracted from classical far-field complex amplitudes computed by an fast Fourier transform-accelerated volume integral equation solver, avoiding perfectly matched layers and near-to-far-field post-processing. The method is validated against analytical results for dielectric spheres and demonstrated on a polarization-converting Pancharatnam-Berry-phase metasurface, revealing strong angular dependence of quantum interference and its direct impact on HOM-dip visibility. The framework provides an efficient and physically transparent tool for structure-dependent quantum-correlation analysis, with potential applications in scatterers-enabled quantum state engineering and quantum inverse design.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a unified theory-numerics framework to compute angle-resolved far-field two-photon correlations from arbitrary lossless dielectric scatterers. It uses a multi-channel scattering formulation that maps two populated incident channels to two selected far-field detection modes, yielding a compact two-channel transfer relation for the second-order correlation function and time-domain coincidence counts. Transfer coefficients are extracted from classical far-field complex amplitudes computed by an FFT-accelerated volume integral equation solver. The method is validated against analytic Mie results for dielectric spheres and demonstrated on a polarization-converting Pancharatnam-Berry-phase metasurface, revealing strong angular dependence of quantum interference and its impact on HOM-dip visibility.

Significance. If the central numerical pipeline holds, the work supplies an efficient, parameter-free route to structure-dependent quantum-correlation analysis for lossless scatterers by directly importing classical far-field amplitudes into the two-photon input-output relation. Validation against Mie theory for spheres and the explicit far-field extraction without PMLs or near-to-far post-processing are concrete strengths. The framework is transparent for quantum inverse design and scatterer-enabled state engineering applications.

major comments (1)
  1. [§3] §3 (multi-channel scattering formulation): the claim that the two-channel truncation remains valid for arbitrary lossless dielectric scatterers without additional near-field corrections is load-bearing for the central claim; a brief derivation or reference showing that the selected far-field modes capture the relevant sub-block of the unitary S-matrix for the demonstrated metasurface would strengthen the argument.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figure 4] Figure 4 (metasurface demonstration): the angular dependence of the visibility is shown but the precise definition of the two selected detection modes (e.g., their solid angle or polarization basis) is not stated explicitly in the caption; adding this would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Eq. (12)] Eq. (12) (second-order correlation): the time-domain coincidence count expression assumes a specific normalization of the incident two-photon state; a short remark on how this normalization is chosen for the sphere validation would clarify comparison with analytic results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comment. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarification.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (multi-channel scattering formulation): the claim that the two-channel truncation remains valid for arbitrary lossless dielectric scatterers without additional near-field corrections is load-bearing for the central claim; a brief derivation or reference showing that the selected far-field modes capture the relevant sub-block of the unitary S-matrix for the demonstrated metasurface would strengthen the argument.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this valuable suggestion. For lossless dielectric scatterers the scattering matrix S is unitary by construction, relating all input and output channels (propagating and evanescent). Because the two-photon correlation function is evaluated from far-field amplitudes, only the propagating far-field modes enter the detected signal; evanescent near-field components decay exponentially and do not contribute to the angle-resolved far-field correlations. Consequently, the two-channel transfer relation is precisely the sub-block of S connecting the two chosen incident channels to the two selected far-field detection modes. This projection is standard in far-field multi-port scattering theory and is directly furnished by the classical far-field amplitudes obtained from the FFT-accelerated volume-integral-equation solver. The same truncation reproduces the exact Mie analytic results for spheres, confirming consistency. For the Pancharatnam-Berry-phase metasurface the dominant effect is far-field polarization conversion and angular redistribution, which is captured by the selected modes. We will add a concise derivation of the far-field sub-block extraction together with a reference to multi-port quantum-optical scattering formalism in the revised §3. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivation extracts transfer coefficients directly from classical far-field complex amplitudes produced by the FFT-accelerated VIE solver and inserts them into a standard two-channel scattering relation for the second-order correlation function. This is a direct application of linear scattering theory for lossless media, where the far-field amplitudes are the physical inputs rather than outputs of the quantum calculation. The paper validates the pipeline against independent Mie-theory results for spheres and applies it to a metasurface example; no parameter fitting, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation reduces the reported visibility curves or coincidence counts to the inputs by construction. The central claim therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on the standard volume-integral-equation formulation for lossless dielectrics and the multi-channel scattering relation; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the geometry and material contrast already present in the classical solver.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The scatterer is lossless and the incident fields are monochromatic plane waves in two populated channels.
    Invoked in the multi-channel scattering formulation section to justify the two-channel transfer relation.
  • domain assumption Far-field complex amplitudes obtained from the VIE solver can be directly inserted into the quantum correlation function without additional near-to-far-field corrections.
    Stated in the abstract and methods description as the core extraction step.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5726 in / 1297 out tokens · 21221 ms · 2026-05-18T21:03:13.798730+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Computational framework for non-Markovian multi-emitter dynamics beyond the single-excitation limit

    quant-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Presents a Green's function framework for non-Markovian multi-emitter QED in the two-excitation manifold by retaining photonic amplitudes in a hierarchy of coupled equations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics

    Alexandre Blais, Steven M Girvin, and William D Oliver. Quantum information processing and quantum optics with circuit quantum electrodynamics. Nature Physics, 16(3):247–256, 2020

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Quantum computation and quantum information

    Michael A Nielsen and Isaac L Chuang. Quantum computation and quantum information. Cambridge university press, 2010

    work page 2010

  3. [3]

    Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits

    Pieter Kok, William J Munro, Kae Nemoto, Timothy C Ralph, Jonathan P Dowling, and Gerard J Milburn. Linear optical quantum computing with photonic qubits. Reviews of modern physics, 79(1):135–174, 2007

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Quantum optics

    Marlan O Scully and M Suhail Zubairy. Quantum optics. Cambridge university press, 1997

    work page 1997

  5. [5]

    Spontaneous decay in the presence of dispersing and absorbing bodies: General theory and application to a spherical cavity

    Ho Trung Dung, Ludwig Knöll, and Dirk-Gunnar Welsch. Spontaneous decay in the presence of dispersing and absorbing bodies: General theory and application to a spherical cavity. Physical Review A, 62(5):053804, 2000

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    Spontaneous decay of an excited atom in an absorbing dielectric

    Stefan Scheel, L Knöll, and D-G Welsch. Spontaneous decay of an excited atom in an absorbing dielectric. Physical Review A, 60(5):4094, 1999

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Systematic study of spontaneous emission in a two-dimensional arbitrary inhomogeneous environment

    Peng-fei Qiao, Wei EI Sha, Wallace CH Choy, and Weng Cho Chew. Systematic study of spontaneous emission in a two-dimensional arbitrary inhomogeneous environment. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, 83(4):043824, 2011

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    Comparison of quantum and classical local-field effects on two-level atoms in a dielectric

    Michael E Crenshaw. Comparison of quantum and classical local-field effects on two-level atoms in a dielectric. Physical Review A—Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics , 78(5):053827, 2008

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Casimir effect from macroscopic quantum electrodynamics

    Thomas Gerard Philbin. Casimir effect from macroscopic quantum electrodynamics. New Journal of Physics, 13(6):063026, 2011

    work page 2011

  10. [10]

    Artificial atoms for quantum optics

    Rudolf Bratschitsch and Alfred Leitenstorfer. Artificial atoms for quantum optics. Nature materials, 5(11):855– 856, 2006

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Roadmap on quantum optical systems

    Rainer Dumke, Zehuang Lu, John Close, Nick Robins, Antoine Weis, Manas Mukherjee, Gerhard Birkl, Christoph Hufnagel, Luigi Amico, Malcolm G Boshier, et al. Roadmap on quantum optical systems. Journal of Optics, 18(9):093001, 2016

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Metasurface interferometry toward quantum sensors

    Philip Georgi, Marcello Massaro, Kai-Hong Luo, Basudeb Sain, Nicola Montaut, Harald Herrmann, Thomas Weiss, Guixin Li, Christine Silberhorn, and Thomas Zentgraf. Metasurface interferometry toward quantum sensors. Light: Science & Applications, 8(1):70, 2019

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Quantum information preserving computational electromagnetics

    Dong-Yeop Na, Jie Zhu, Weng C Chew, and Fernando L Teixeira. Quantum information preserving computational electromagnetics. Physical Review A, 102(1):013711, 2020

    work page 2020

  14. [14]

    Some selected unsolved problems in classical and quantum electromagnetics

    Weng Cho Chew, Boyuan Zhang, and Jie Zhu. Some selected unsolved problems in classical and quantum electromagnetics. Progress In Electromagnetics Research, 180, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Quantum radar

    Marco Lanzagorta. Quantum radar. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, 2011. 11

    work page 2011

  16. [16]

    Quantum noise radar: superresolution with quantum antennas by accessing spatiotemporal correlations

    I Peshko, D Mogilevtsev, I Karuseichyk, A Mikhalychev, AP Nizovtsev, G Ya Slepyan, and A Boag. Quantum noise radar: superresolution with quantum antennas by accessing spatiotemporal correlations. Optics Express, 27(20):29217–29231, 2019

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier as quantum source of entangled photons for microwave quantum radar applications

    Patrizia Livreri, Bernardo Galvano, Luca Fasolo, Luca Oberto, Emanuele Enrico, et al. Josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier as quantum source of entangled photons for microwave quantum radar applications. ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES, 179:113–124, 2024

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Quantum antennas

    Gregory Ya Slepyan, Svetlana Vlasenko, and Dmitri Mogilevtsev. Quantum antennas. Advanced Quantum Technologies, 3(4):1900120, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Quantum optics

    Girish S Agarwal. Quantum optics. Cambridge University Press, 2012

    work page 2012

  20. [20]

    Quantum physics of simple optical instruments

    Ulf Leonhardt. Quantum physics of simple optical instruments. Reports on Progress in Physics, 66(7):1207, 2003

    work page 2003

  21. [21]

    Modes and states in quantum optics

    Claude Fabre and Nicolas Treps. Modes and states in quantum optics. Reviews of Modern Physics, 92(3):035005, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Modeling of multimodal scattering by conducting bodies in quantum optics: The method of characteristic modes.Physical Review Applied, 18(1):014024, 2022

    Gregory Ya Slepyan, Dmitri Mogilevtsev, Ilay Levie, and Amir Boag. Modeling of multimodal scattering by conducting bodies in quantum optics: The method of characteristic modes.Physical Review Applied, 18(1):014024, 2022

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Quantum mechanics made simple: Lecture notes, 2012

    Weng Cho Chew. Quantum mechanics made simple: Lecture notes, 2012

    work page 2012

  24. [24]

    Quantum mechanics for scientists and engineers

    David AB Miller. Quantum mechanics for scientists and engineers. Cambridge University Press, 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    Quantum mechanics: fundamentals

    Kurt Gottfried. Quantum mechanics: fundamentals. CRC Press, 2018

    work page 2018

  26. [26]

    Quantum light in complex media and its applications

    Ohad Lib and Yaron Bromberg. Quantum light in complex media and its applications. Nature Physics, 18(9):986– 993, 2022

    work page 2022

  27. [27]

    Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference

    Chong-Ki Hong, Zhe-Yu Ou, and Leonard Mandel. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Physical review letters, 59(18):2044, 1987

    work page 2044

  28. [28]

    A quantum description of the beam splitter

    Sudhakar Prasad, Marlan O Scully, and Werner Martienssen. A quantum description of the beam splitter. Optics communications, 62(3):139–145, 1987

    work page 1987

  29. [29]

    Mode-selective quantization and multimodal effective models for spherically layered systems

    David Dzsotjan, Benjamin Rousseaux, Hans R Jauslin, G Colas des Francs, Christophe Couteau, and Stéphane Guerin. Mode-selective quantization and multimodal effective models for spherically layered systems. Physical Review A, 94(2):023818, 2016

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    Photons in the presence of parabolic mirrors

    R Gutiérrez-Jáuregui and R Jáuregui. Photons in the presence of parabolic mirrors. Physical Review A , 98(4):043808, 2018

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Quantum electrodynamics with a nonmoving dielectric sphere: quantizing lorenz–mie scattering

    Patrick Maurer, Carlos Gonzalez-Ballestero, and Oriol Romero-Isart. Quantum electrodynamics with a nonmoving dielectric sphere: quantizing lorenz–mie scattering. Journal of the Optical Society of America B, 40(12):3137– 3155, 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Three-dimensional quantization of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorbing inhomogeneous dielectrics

    Ho Trung Dung, Ludwig Knöll, and Dirk-Gunnar Welsch. Three-dimensional quantization of the electromagnetic field in dispersive and absorbing inhomogeneous dielectrics. Physical Review A, 57(5):3931, 1998

    work page 1998

  33. [33]

    Principles of nano-optics

    Lukas Novotny and Bert Hecht. Principles of nano-optics. Cambridge university press, 2012

    work page 2012

  34. [34]

    Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics-concepts and applications

    Stefan Scheel, Stefan Yoshi Buhmann, et al. Macroscopic quantum electrodynamics-concepts and applications. Acta Phys. Slovaca, 58(5):675–809, 2008

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    A physically motivated quantization of the electromagnetic field

    Robert Bennett, Thomas M Barlow, and Almut Beige. A physically motivated quantization of the electromagnetic field. European Journal of Physics, 37(1):014001, 2015

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Aspects of quantum electrodynamics compared to the classical case: Similarity and disparity of quantum and classical electromagnetics

    George W Hanson. Aspects of quantum electrodynamics compared to the classical case: Similarity and disparity of quantum and classical electromagnetics. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 62(4):16–26, 2020

    work page 2020

  37. [37]

    Quantum electromagnetic finite-difference time-domain solver.Quantum Reports, 2(2):253–265, 2020

    Dong-Yeop Na and Weng Cho Chew. Quantum electromagnetic finite-difference time-domain solver.Quantum Reports, 2(2):253–265, 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Light quantization for arbitrary scattering systems

    Salvatore Savasta, Omar Di Stefano, and Raffaello Girlanda. Light quantization for arbitrary scattering systems. Physical Review A, 65(4):043801, 2002

    work page 2002

  39. [39]

    Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell’s equations in isotropic media

    Kane Yee. Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems involving maxwell’s equations in isotropic media. IEEE Transactions on antennas and propagation, 14(3):302–307, 1966

    work page 1966

  40. [40]

    The finite element method in electromagnetics

    Jian-Ming Jin. The finite element method in electromagnetics. John Wiley & Sons, 2015

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Allen Taflove and S. Hagness. Computational electrodynamics: the finite-difference time-domain method. 2nd ed, volume 67–106. 2nd ed. Norwood, 06 2000. 12

    work page 2000

  42. [42]

    Modal expansions for resonance scattering phenomena

    RJ Garbacz. Modal expansions for resonance scattering phenomena. Proceedings of the IEEE, 53(8):856–864, 2005

    work page 2005

  43. [43]

    A generalized expansion for radiated and scattered fields

    Robert Garbacz and R Turpin. A generalized expansion for radiated and scattered fields. IEEE transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 19(3):348–358, 2003

    work page 2003

  44. [44]

    Antenna shape synthesis using characteristic modes

    R Garbacz and D Pozar. Antenna shape synthesis using characteristic modes. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 30(3):340–350, 2003

    work page 2003

  45. [45]

    Theory of characteristic modes for conducting bodies

    R Harrington and J Mautz. Theory of characteristic modes for conducting bodies. IEEE transactions on antennas and propagation, 19(5):622–628, 1971

    work page 1971

  46. [46]

    Characteristic modes: Theory and applications in antenna engineering

    Yikai Chen and Chao-Fu Wang. Characteristic modes: Theory and applications in antenna engineering. John Wiley & Sons, 2015

    work page 2015

  47. [47]

    Computation of characteristic modes for conducting bodies

    R Harrington and J Mautz. Computation of characteristic modes for conducting bodies. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 19(5):629–639, 2003

    work page 2003

  48. [48]

    Quantum coherence of light emitted by two single-photon sources in a structured environment

    Antoine Canaguier-Durand and Rémi Carminati. Quantum coherence of light emitted by two single-photon sources in a structured environment. Physical Review A, 93(3):033836, 2016

    work page 2016

  49. [49]

    A parallel block preconditioner-based vie-fft algorithm for modeling the electro- magnetic response from nanostructures

    Chengnian Huang and EI Wei. A parallel block preconditioner-based vie-fft algorithm for modeling the electro- magnetic response from nanostructures. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 72(1):1051–1056, 2023

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Optical coherence and quantum optics

    Leonard Mandel and Emil Wolf. Optical coherence and quantum optics. Cambridge university press, 1995

    work page 1995

  51. [51]

    Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light-i

    R Hanbury Brown, Richard Quinton Twiss, and givenName surName. Interferometry of the intensity fluctuations in light-i. basic theory: the correlation between photons in coherent beams of radiation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 242(1230):300–324, 1957

    work page 1957

  52. [52]

    The quantum theory of optical coherence

    Roy J Glauber. The quantum theory of optical coherence. Physical Review, 130(6):2529, 1963

    work page 1963

  53. [53]

    Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence

    H Jeff Kimble, Mario Dagenais, and Leonard Mandel. Photon antibunching in resonance fluorescence. Physical Review Letters, 39(11):691, 1977

    work page 1977

  54. [54]

    Bunching and antibunching in the fluorescence of semiconductor nanocrystals

    Gaetan Messin, Jean-Pierre Hermier, Elisabeth Giacobino, Pierre Desbiolles, and Maxime Dahan. Bunching and antibunching in the fluorescence of semiconductor nanocrystals. Optics Letters, 26(23):1891–1893, 2001

    work page 2001

  55. [55]

    Speckle fluctuations resolve the interdistance between incoherent point sources in complex media

    Rémi Carminati, Gabriel Cwilich, Luis S Froufe-Pérez, and JJ Sáenz. Speckle fluctuations resolve the interdistance between incoherent point sources in complex media. Physical Review A, 91(2):023807, 2015

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    Bi-cgstab: A fast and smoothly converging variant of bi-cg for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems

    Henk A Van der V orst. Bi-cgstab: A fast and smoothly converging variant of bi-cg for the solution of nonsymmetric linear systems. SIAM Journal on scientific and Statistical Computing, 13(2):631–644, 1992

    work page 1992

  57. [57]

    Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging

    Mohammadreza Khorasaninejad, Wei Ting Chen, Robert C Devlin, Jaewon Oh, Alexander Y Zhu, and Federico Capasso. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science, 352(6290):1190–1194, 2016

    work page 2016

  58. [58]

    A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible

    Shuming Wang, Pin Chieh Wu, Vin-Cent Su, Yi-Chieh Lai, Mu-Ku Chen, Hsin Yu Kuo, Bo Han Chen, Yu Han Chen, Tzu-Ting Huang, Jung-Hsi Wang, et al. A broadband achromatic metalens in the visible. Nature nanotechnology, 13(3):227–232, 2018

    work page 2018

  59. [59]

    Three-dimensional optical holography using a plasmonic metasurface

    Lingling Huang, Xianzhong Chen, Holger Mühlenbernd, Hao Zhang, Shumei Chen, Benfeng Bai, Qiaofeng Tan, Guofan Jin, Kok-Wai Cheah, Cheng-Wei Qiu, et al. Three-dimensional optical holography using a plasmonic metasurface. Nature communications, 4(1):2808, 2013. 13

    work page 2013