Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 78 references

The holographic entanglement pattern of BTZ planar black hole from a thread perspective

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that the entanglement entropy of a boundary interval in the planar BTZ black hole has a thread-level decomposition into same-side and wormhole-crossing contributions, with the cross-wormhole flux summing exactly to the…

desk verdict Useful new cross-boundary thread-flux formula for planar BTZ, but the appendix lemma that anchors the thermal-entropy sum rule is genuinely unproven and needs to be fixed before the central claim can be cited as established. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.16977 v2 pith:MCLK3QTX submitted 2025-08-23 hep-th

Yi-Yu Lin , Dong-Yu Fang , Jie-Chen Jin , Chen-Ye Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords entanglementthreadsBTZblackholeholographicentropyconditionalmutualinformationthermalCFTwormholepartialperfecttensorstate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper extends the entanglement-thread picture of holographic entanglement, previously developed for the vacuum, to the planar BTZ black hole and its dual finite-temperature CFT. The central proposal is that the von Neumann entropy of a boundary interval can be decomposed into threads whose endpoints lie on the same boundary and threads that pass through the wormhole to the opposite asymptotic boundary. The quantitative core is a formula for the cross-wormhole flux between an interval and its mirror interval, and the statement that summing this flux over the entire opposite boundary reproduces the standard thermal entropy density $\rho = \pi c/(3\beta_{\mathrm{CFT}})$. If correct, this gives a thread-by-thread account of how thermal entropy is distributed in a holographic state and ties the apparent RT-surface phase transition to a competition between two thread flows.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the entanglement-thread flux function $F_{ij} = \tfrac12 I(A_i, A_j | \tilde L)$, half the conditional mutual information between two elementary boundary regions separated by an interval $\tilde L$; in the thread picture this counts the number of threads connecting the two regions. The paper computes these fluxes in the two-sided planar BTZ black hole by mapping its equal-time slice to the Poincaré disk, with the horizon as the disk diameter, exploiting the cutoff-independence of conditional mutual information to switch between BTZ and global-AdS cutoff schemes. The geometric lemma in the appendix, $d\sigma = \tfrac12 I(a:D|b)$, asserts that the horizon segment cut out by two orthogonally intersecting reference geodesics has length equal to half the conditional mutual information between the boundary interval $a$ and the opposite boundary $D$; this lemma is what converts the thread-flux sum into the thermal entropy density.

What would settle it

Choose generic values of the interval sizes $b$ and $c$ and the disk radius $R$ in the upper-half-plane model, compute the horizon segment length $d\sigma$ by direct numerical integration of the hyperbolic metric, and compare it with $\tfrac12(d_{ab}+d_{ac}-d_b-d_c)$ obtained from standard geodesic lengths; any mismatch falsifies Eq. (75). Alternatively, sum the $\cosh$-ratio flux (53) numerically over many mirror intervals and check that it approaches $a_i\cdot \pi c/(3\beta_{\mathrm{CFT}})$ without using the lemma.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a boundary interval $A_i$ in the two-sided planar BTZ geometry receives entanglement threads from two sources with explicit fluxes: from an interval $A_j$ on the same side, $F_{ij} = \frac{c}{6}\ln\big[\sinh(\pi(a_i+\tilde a)/\beta)\sinh(\pi(a_j+\tilde a)/\beta)/(\sinh(\pi(a_i+\tilde a+a_j)/\beta)\sinh(\pi\tilde a/\beta))\big]$, and from its mirror $\bar A_j$ on the other side, $F_{i\bar j} = \frac{c}{6}\ln\big[\cosh(\pi(a_i+\tilde a+a_j)/\beta)\cosh(\pi\tilde a/\beta)/(\cosh(\pi(a_i+\tilde a)/\beta)\cosh(\pi(a_j+\tilde a)/\beta))\big]$. Summing $F_{i\bar j}$ over all mirror intervals gives exactly the area of the horizon segment $\sigma_i$ divided by $4G_N$, which translates to $\rho = \pi c/(3\beta_{\mathrm{CFT}})$, the known thermal entropy density. The paper further shows that the RT phase transition for a disconnected region $A = A_1 \cup A_2$ is a continuous competition between the flows $F_{A_1A_2}$ and $F_{\bar A D}$, with equality at $\alpha' = (\ln 2)/2$, and argues that this continuity requires the wormhole-crossing threads and the internal same-side threads to pair into rank-4 perfect-tensor states.

Load-bearing premise

The central sum rule rests on the appendix's geometric lemma, and the lemma's final step—equating the directly computed horizon-segment length with half the conditional mutual information—is asserted as 'evident' without showing the intervening geodesic-length algebra; if that equality fails, the claimed thread-flux sum reproducing thermal entropy density does not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every elementary boundary interval $A_i$, the horizon contribution to its entropy is resolved into a sum of mirror-interval fluxes given by the cosh-ratio formula, so the coarse-grained uniform horizon flow of earlier bit-thread pictures is replaced by a fine-grained distribution.
  • The partial entanglement entropy of a subregion in the single-sided BTZ black hole is given by $s_A(A_i) = \sum_{j\in U\setminus A}F_{ij} + \sum_{\bar j\in D}F_{i\bar j}$, which reproduces the earlier PEE formulas once the explicit fluxes are inserted.
  • The RT phase transition for a disconnected region is continuous in the thread picture: the two candidate surfaces correspond to which of $F_{A_1A_2}$ and $F_{\bar A D}$ is larger, and the transition occurs at $\alpha' = (\ln 2)/2$ where both fluxes equal $(c/6)\ln 2$.
  • At the critical point the thread configuration cannot be described by independent Bell pairs; it requires rank-4 perfect-tensor states, so the wormhole-crossing and internal threads must share perfect-type multipartite entanglement.
  • The construction generalizes in principle to multi-boundary wormholes obtained by quotienting the Poincaré disk, where thread flows would be cut and reglued along identified geodesics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct numerical summation of Eq. (53) over mirror intervals, without invoking the appendix lemma, would independently verify the thermal-entropy sum rule and isolate whether the asserted geometric matching is the only fragile step.
  • The same cut-and-glue argument suggests explicit thread-flux formulas for multi-boundary wormholes in AdS3; computing and testing one such flux against RT surfaces would extend the paper's central claim beyond the two-sided case.
  • The perfect-tensor claim predicts that at the critical point the four-party state on $A_1, A_2, \bar A, D$ is absolutely maximally entangled; a tensor-network calculation of its tripartite mutual information (which should vanish for a perfect state) would test this prediction directly.
  • Following the paper's kinematic-space reasoning, one would expect an analogue of the cosh-ratio flux in higher-dimensional planar black holes; whether such an exact formula exists is left open, so deriving it would show the three-dimensional result is not an artefact of the Poincaré-disk construction.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops an entanglement-thread description of the planar BTZ black hole, building on the author's earlier thread framework. Using the equivalence between the two-sided planar BTZ slice and the Poincaré disk, it derives explicit formulas for the number of threads connecting a boundary region A_i on one side to a same-side region A_j (Eq. (27)/(48)) and to a mirror region \bar{A}_j on the other side (Eq. (53)). The central quantitative claim is that summing the cross-boundary flux (53) over all mirror regions reproduces the thermal entropy density \rho = \pi c/(3\beta_{\rm CFT}) of the dual CFT, as stated in Eqs. (54)-(56). The paper also discusses connections to bit threads, RT phase transitions, partial entanglement entropy, and perfect-tensor states. The derivation of the individual flux formulas is coherent and cutoff-independent, but the sum rule (54) rests on the geometric lemma (75) whose proof in Appendix A is incomplete and contains algebraic inconsistencies.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a quantitative thread-level decomposition of thermal interval entanglement into same-side and wormhole-crossing contributions, which is a meaningful refinement of the bit-thread picture and gives new support for a perfect-tensor interpretation of black-hole entanglement. The paper's derivations of (48) and (53) from geodesic lengths and conditional mutual information are transparent, and the RT phase-transition analysis in Section 4.2 correctly reproduces the known critical point. The main obstacle is that the geometric lemma (75) supporting the central sum rule (54) is not proven in the appendix; without that lemma, the connection between the refined flux (53) and the standard thermal entropy density is not established.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eqs. (77)-(78)] The claimed range in Eq. (78) is inconsistent with Eq. (77) for the stated parameter regime. For k = b/R < 1, Eq. (77) gives cos\theta_1 = -2(k-1)/(k^2-2k+2) > 0 (e.g., k = 1/2 gives cos\theta_1 = 0.8), while Eq. (78) asserts cos\theta_1 \in [-1/\sqrt{2}, 0). This contradiction indicates a sign or angle-convention error in Eqs. (76)-(78), and it prevents the reader from following the subsequent evaluation of the integral (81).
  2. [Appendix A, Eqs. (83)-(84)] The simplification from Eq. (83) to Eq. (84) is not valid as written. Each factor in Eq. (83) reduces to ((m-2)^2)/m^2 or ((k-2)^2)/k^2, so the logarithm gives \log|2-m|/m + \log|2-k|/k rather than \log[(2R-c)/c \cdot (2R-b)/b], unless one assumes 0 < b,c < 2R and chooses signs appropriately; neither the restriction nor the sign choice is stated or justified. The intermediate geodesic-length computations that would justify Eq. (84) are omitted.
  3. [Appendix A, final matching and Eq. (54)] The key identity (75) is not proven: after Eq. (84) the text asserts 'it is evident' that the result matches the right-hand side of Eq. (75), but the right-hand side (1/2)(d_{ab} + d_{ac} - d_b - d_c) is never expanded in terms of b, c, and R. Since Eq. (75) is the only support for the sum rule (54), and Eq. (54) is the link between the refined flux (53) and the thermal entropy density (56), this is a load-bearing gap. A direct summation of Eq. (53) over all \bar{A}_j, or a numerical evaluation of Eq. (75), would provide the needed independent check.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2.2, Eq. (54)] The notation \sigma_i is introduced in Section 2.2, but in the two-sided disk representation its length is identified with L\Delta\Phi' without an explicit derivation; please state this identification and the IR cutoff convention used to make the horizon segment finite.
  2. [Figure 9] The horizontal axis is labeled only by \tilde{a}, and the normalization of the plotted F_{ij} and F_{i\bar{j}} curves is not specified; please add axis labels and state the fixed elementary-region size and temperature used.
  3. [Section 3.2.2, Eq. (50)] The substitution (49) assumes an orientation convention for the endpoints of \bar{A}_j; please spell out which endpoint is \bar{\xi}_{j1} and which is \bar{\xi}_{j2} so that the absolute values in Eq. (50) are unambiguous.
  4. [Figure 12 caption] The caption contains the typo 'BZT boundary region'; it should read 'BTZ boundary region'.
  5. [Appendix A, around Eq. (75)] The word 'horizon' is used for both the BTZ horizon and the geodesic \Sigma in the appendix; please clarify explicitly that \Sigma is the image of the BTZ horizon in the chosen upper-half-plane representation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the cross-wormhole flux formula and the thermal-entropy sum rule are derived from RT/CMI inputs, with prior self-authored thread work used only for interpretation.

full rationale

The central quantitative claim, Eq. (53), is obtained by computing half the conditional mutual information between boundary intervals in the Poincaré disk and then mapping to BTZ coordinates; it is not fitted from the claimed outcome. The sum rule (54)-(56) is presented as a theorem whose proof is deferred to Appendix A, and the value rho = pi c/(3 beta_CFT) is derived from the geometric area factor, not imposed. The paper's reliance on the authors' prior thread framework [17, 23] supplies the interpretation (threads as geodesics, F = (1/2) I) and the uniqueness statement, but Eq. (53) and Eq. (56) stand on the standard RT length formula and CMI identities in the same way as the earlier pure-AdS result. The appendix lemma d sigma = (1/2) I(a:D|b) is asserted rather than fully demonstrated, and the final matching of Eq. (84) to the right-hand side of Eq. (75) is a proof gap, not a circular step; it is a correctness/rigor concern that does not raise the circularity score. The paper itself notes the apparent circularity in regularizing entanglement entropy via CMI (Section 2.1) and resolves it by taking the finite thread number as the fundamental object, so no reduction of the derivation to its inputs by construction is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard holographic entropy formulas, the known thread/CMI correspondence from [23], and the geodesic thread interpretation from [17]. No numerically fitted parameters appear; the thermal density is derived and cross-checked against the known value. No new particles, forces, or fields are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Ryu-Takayanagi formula and the thermal entropy formula (20) for a finite-temperature CFT are assumed as the holographic dictionary.
    Used in Sec 2.2 and Sec 3.2.2 to compute entropies and thread fluxes.
  • domain assumption The number of entanglement threads between two elementary regions equals half the conditional mutual information, Eq. (26), following the locking bit thread configuration of [23].
    This is the operational definition of F_ij and is imported from prior work; the paper does not re-derive the uniqueness of the thread configuration.
  • domain assumption In pure AdS, entanglement thread trajectories are exactly geodesics, and threads correspond to wires in a quantum circuit, as argued in [17].
    Used in Sec 3.1 to construct the refined thread configuration and in Sec 4.2 to assign perfect-tensor states to intersecting threads.
  • standard math The two-sided planar BTZ black hole at equal time is isometric to the full Poincaré disk via the coordinate transformation of Sec 3.1.
    Standard AdS3/CFT2 geometry; the mapping is given explicitly in Eqs. (32)-(39).
  • standard math The appendix geometric proof assumes the validity of Poincaré disk isometries and the standard geodesic length formula dl = 2 log(l/ε).
    Used in Appendix A to derive dσ.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The holographic entanglement pattern of BTZ planar black hole from a thread perspective." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MCLK3QTX

@misc{pith2026250816977,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The holographic entanglement pattern of BTZ planar black hole from a thread perspective},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MCLK3QTX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.16977}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we study the holographic quantum entanglement structure in the finite-temperature CFT state/planar BTZ black hole correspondence from the perspective of entanglement threads. Unlike previous studies based on bit threads, these entanglement threads provide a more detailed characterization of the contribution sources to the von Neumann entropy of boundary subregions, in particular by quantitatively deriving the flux function of entanglement threads that traverse the wormhole horizon and connect the two asymptotic boundaries. Since entanglement threads are naturally and closely related to tensor network states, the results are argued to imply the existence of the perfect-type entanglement formed jointly by the entanglement threads crossing the wormhole and the internal threads in the single-sided boundary. We also discuss the close connections of this work with concepts such as bit threads and partial entanglement entropy.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

78 extracted references · 12 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,

    B. Swingle, “Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,” Phys. Rev. D86, 065007 (2012) [arXiv:0905.1317 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormaliza- tion,

    B. Swingle, “Constructing holographic spacetimes using entanglement renormaliza- tion,” [arXiv:1209.3304 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    Holographic quantum error- correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill, “Holographic quantum error- correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,” JHEP06, 149 (2015) [arXiv:1503.06237 [hep-th]]. 39

    arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    Entanglement Renormalization,

    G. Vidal, “Entanglement Renormalization,” Phys. Rev. Lett.99, no.22, 220405 (2007) [arXiv:cond-mat/0512165 [cond-mat]]

    arXiv 2007

  5. [5]

    Class of Quantum Many-Body States That Can Be Efficiently Simulated,

    G. Vidal, “Class of Quantum Many-Body States That Can Be Efficiently Simulated,” Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 110501 (2008) [arXiv:quant-ph/0610099 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Tensor network renormalization yields the multiscale entan- glement renormalization ansatz,

    E. Glen, G. Vidal, “Tensor network renormalization yields the multiscale entan- glement renormalization ansatz,” Phys. Rev. Lett.115,200401 (2015). [arXiv:cond- mat/1502.05385 [cond-mat]]

    arXiv 2015

  7. [7]

    The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergrav- ity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergrav- ity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 231-252 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9711200 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1998

  8. [8]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428, 105-114 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802109 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 1998

Show all 78 references
  1. [9]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2, 253- 291 (1998) [arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]]

    1998 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bit threads and holographic entanglement,

    M. Freedman and M. Headrick, “Bit threads and holographic entanglement,” Com- mun. Math. Phys.352, no.1, 407-438 (2017) [arXiv:1604.00354 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Bit Threads and Holographic Monogamy,

    S. X. Cui, P. Hayden, T. He, M. Headrick, B. Stoica and M. Walter, “Bit Threads and Holographic Monogamy,” Commun. Math. Phys.376, no.1, 609-648 (2019) [arXiv:1808.05234 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Riemannian and Lorentzian flow-cut theorems,

    M. Headrick and V. E. Hubeny, “Riemannian and Lorentzian flow-cut theorems,” Class. Quant. Grav.35, no.10, 10 (2018) [arXiv:1710.09516 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Covariant bit threads,

    M. Headrick and V. E. Hubeny, “Covariant bit threads,” JHEP07, 180 (2023) [arXiv:2208.10507 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Crossing Versus Locking: Bit Threads and Continuum Multiflows,

    M. Headrick, J. Held and J. Herman, “Crossing Versus Locking: Bit Threads and Continuum Multiflows,” Commun. Math. Phys.396, no.1, 265-313 (2022) [arXiv:2008.03197 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Geometric Aspects of Holographic Bit Threads,

    C. A. Ag´ on, J. De Boer and J. F. Pedraza, “Geometric Aspects of Holographic Bit Threads,” JHEP05, 075 (2019) [arXiv:1811.08879 [hep-th]]. 40

    2019 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Holographic entanglement contour, bit threads, and the entanglement tsunami,

    J. Kudler-Flam, I. MacCormack and S. Ryu, “Holographic entanglement contour, bit threads, and the entanglement tsunami,” J. Phys. A52, no.32, 325401 (2019) [arXiv:1902.04654 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  9. [17]

    The thread embodiment of holographic quantum entanglement,

    Y. Y. Lin, “The thread embodiment of holographic quantum entanglement,” [arXiv:2501.10691 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  10. [18]

    Holographic coarse-grained states and the necessity of perfect entanglement,

    Y. Y. Lin and J. Zhang, “Holographic coarse-grained states and the necessity of perfect entanglement,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.12, 126012 (2024) [arXiv:2312.14498 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Thread/State correspondence: from bit threads to qubit threads,

    Y. Y. Lin and J. C. Jin, “Thread/State correspondence: from bit threads to qubit threads,” JHEP02, 245 (2023) [arXiv:2210.08783 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Thread/State correspondence: the qubit threads model of holographic gravity,

    Y. Y. Lin and J. C. Jin, “Thread/State correspondence: the qubit threads model of holographic gravity,” [arXiv:2208.08963 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bit thread, entanglement distillation, and entan- glement of purification,

    Y. Y. Lin, J. R. Sun and Y. Sun, “Bit thread, entanglement distillation, and entan- glement of purification,” Phys. Rev. D103, no.12, 126002 (2021) [arXiv:2012.05737 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Distilled density matrices of holographic partial entanglement en- tropy from thread-state correspondence,

    Y. Y. Lin, “Distilled density matrices of holographic partial entanglement en- tropy from thread-state correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.10, 106010 (2023) [arXiv:2305.02895 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Deriving the PEE proposal from the locking bit thread configuration,

    Y. Y. Lin, J. R. Sun and J. Zhang, “Deriving the PEE proposal from the locking bit thread configuration,” JHEP10, 164 (2021) [arXiv:2105.09176 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Majorana dimers and holo- graphic quantum error-correcting codes,

    A. Jahn, M. Gluza, F. Pastawski and J. Eisert, “Majorana dimers and holo- graphic quantum error-correcting codes,” Phys. Rev. Research.1, 033079 (2019) [arXiv:1905.03268 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Geodesic string condensation from symmetric tensor gauge theory: a unify- ing framework of holographic toy models,

    H. Yan, “Geodesic string condensation from symmetric tensor gauge theory: a unify- ing framework of holographic toy models,” Phys. Rev. B102, no.16, 161119 (2020) [arXiv:1911.01007 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    2020 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Partial entanglement network and bulk geometry recon- struction in AdS/CFT,

    J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen, “Partial entanglement network and bulk geometry recon- struction in AdS/CFT,” [arXiv:2401.07471 [hep-th]]

  19. [27]

    Geometrizing the partial entanglement entropy: from PEE threads to bit threads,

    J. Lin, Y. Lu and Q. Wen, “Geometrizing the partial entanglement entropy: from PEE threads to bit threads,” JHEP2024, no.02, 191 (2024) [arXiv:2311.02301 [hep-th]]. 41

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Entanglement islands read perfect-tensor entan- glement,

    Y. Y. Lin, J. Zhang and J. C. Jin, “Entanglement islands read perfect-tensor entan- glement,” JHEP04, 113 (2024) [arXiv:2312.14486 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    The PEE aspects of entanglement islands from bit threads,

    Y. Y. Lin, J. R. Sun, Y. Sun and J. C. Jin, “The PEE aspects of entanglement islands from bit threads,” JHEP07, 009 (2022) [arXiv:2203.03111 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Partial entanglement entropy threads in the island phase,

    Q. Wen, M. Xu and H. Zhong, “Partial entanglement entropy threads in the island phase,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.4, 046027 (2025) [arXiv:2408.13535 [hep-th]]

    2025 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Holographic thermal entropy from geodesic bit threads,

    S. Caggioli, F. Gentile, D. Seminara and E. Tonni, “Holographic thermal entropy from geodesic bit threads,” JHEP07, 088 (2024) [arXiv:2403.03930 [hep-th]]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Modular conjugations in 2D conformal field theory and holographic bit threads,

    M. Mintchev and E. Tonni, “Modular conjugations in 2D conformal field theory and holographic bit threads,” JHEP12, 149 (2022) [arXiv:2209.03242 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT,” Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 181602 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0603001 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, “Aspects of Holographic Entanglement Entropy,” JHEP 08, 045 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0605073 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  27. [35]

    A Covariant holographic entan- glement entropy proposal,

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, “A Covariant holographic entan- glement entropy proposal,” JHEP07, 062 (2007) [arXiv:0705.0016 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Integral Geometry and Hologra- phy,

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully, “Integral Geometry and Hologra- phy,” JHEP10, 175 (2015) [arXiv:1505.05515 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Tensor Networks from Kinematic Space,

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish and J. Sully, “Tensor Networks from Kinematic Space,” JHEP07, 100 (2016) [arXiv:1512.01548 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  30. [38]

    The Holographic Entropy Cone,

    N. Bao, S. Nezami, H. Ooguri, B. Stoica, J. Sully and M. Walter, “The Holographic Entropy Cone,” JHEP09, 130 (2015) [arXiv:1505.07839 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  31. [39]

    The holographic entropy arrangement,

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and M. Rota, “The holographic entropy arrangement,” Fortsch. Phys.67, no.4, 1900011 (2019) [arXiv:1812.08133 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Holographic entropy relations,

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and M. Rota, “Holographic entropy relations,” Fortsch. Phys.66, no.11-12, 1800067 (2018) [arXiv:1808.07871 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Holographic entropy cone for five regions,

    S. Hern´ andez Cuenca, “Holographic entropy cone for five regions,” Phys. Rev. D100, no.2, 026004 (2019) [arXiv:1903.09148 [hep-th]]. 42

    2019 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Entanglement contour,

    G. Vidal and Y. Chen, “Entanglement contour,” J. Stat. Mech.2014, no.10, P10011 (2014) [arXiv:1406.1471 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    2014 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy,

    Q. Wen, “Formulas for Partial Entanglement Entropy,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, no.2, 023170 (2020) [arXiv:1910.10978 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour,

    Q. Wen, “Fine structure in holographic entanglement and entanglement contour,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.10, 106004 (2018) [arXiv:1803.05552 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Equivalence of Emergent de Sitter Spaces from Conformal Field Theory,

    C. T. Asplund, N. Callebaut and C. Zukowski, “Equivalence of Emergent de Sitter Spaces from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP09, 154 (2016) [arXiv:1604.02687 [hep- th]]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Scanning spacetime with patterns of entanglement,

    P. L´ evay and B. Boldis, “Scanning spacetime with patterns of entanglement,” Phys. Rev. D101, no.6, 066021 (2020) [arXiv:2001.07923 [hep-th]]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Cluster algebraic description of entanglement patterns for the BTZ black hole,

    B. Boldis and P. L´ evay, “Cluster algebraic description of entanglement patterns for the BTZ black hole,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.4, 046020 (2022) [arXiv:2108.10638 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,” Commun. Math. Phys.104, 207-226 (1986)

    1986

  41. [49]

    Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,

    P. Calabrese and J. L. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,” J. Stat. Mech.0406, P06002 (2004) [arXiv:hep-th/0405152 [hep-th]]

    2004 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Eternal black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP04, 021 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0106112 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Thermo field dynamics of black holes,

    W. Israel, “Thermo field dynamics of black holes,” Phys. Lett. A57, 107-110 (1976)

    1976

  44. [52]

    The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,

    M. Banados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, “The Black hole in three-dimensional space-time,” Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1849-1851 (1992) [arXiv:hep-th/9204099 [hep-th]]

    1992 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,

    M. Banados, M. Henneaux, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, “Geometry of the (2+1) black hole,” Phys. Rev. D48, 1506-1525 (1993) [erratum: Phys. Rev. D88, 069902 (2013)] [arXiv:gr-qc/9302012 [gr-qc]]

    1993 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Holographic View on Quantum Correlations and Mutual Information between Disjoint Blocks of a Quantum Critical System,

    J. Molina-Vilaplana and P. Sodano, “Holographic View on Quantum Correlations and Mutual Information between Disjoint Blocks of a Quantum Critical System,” JHEP 10, 011 (2011) [arXiv:1108.1277 [quant-ph]]. 43

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Tensor network and a black hole,

    H. Matsueda, M. Ishihara and Y. Hashizume, “Tensor network and a black hole,” Phys. Rev. D87, no.6, 066002 (2013) [arXiv:1208.0206 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Entanglement, Tensor Networks and Black Hole Horizons,

    J. Molina-Vilaplana and J. Prior, “Entanglement, Tensor Networks and Black Hole Horizons,” Gen. Rel. Grav.46, no.11, 1823 (2014) [arXiv:1403.5395 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Consistency conditions for an AdS multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz correspondence,

    N. Bao, C. Cao, S. M. Carroll, A. Chatwin-Davies, N. Hunter-Jones, J. Pollack and G. N. Remmen, “Consistency conditions for an AdS multiscale entanglement renormalization ansatz correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D91, no.12, 125036 (2015) [arXiv:1504.06632 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Maximally multipartite entangled states,

    P. Facchi, G. Florio, G. Parisi and S. Pascazio, “Maximally multipartite entangled states,” Phys. Rev. A77, no.6, 060304 (2008)

    2008

  51. [59]

    Absolute Maximal Entangle- ment and Quantum Secret Sharing,

    W. Helwig, W. Cui, A. Riera, J. I. Latorre and H. K. Lo, “Absolute Maximal Entangle- ment and Quantum Secret Sharing,” Phys. Rev. A86, 052335 (2012) [arXiv:1204.2289 [quant-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Absolutely Maximally Entangled States: Existence and Applications,

    W. Helwig and W. Cui, “Absolutely Maximally Entangled States: Existence and Applications,” [arXiv:1306.2536 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv

  53. [61]

    Absolutely Maximally Entangled Qudit Graph States,

    W. Helwig, “Absolutely Maximally Entangled Qudit Graph States,” [arXiv:1306.2879 [quant-ph]]

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, “Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP04, 163 (2015) [arXiv:1411.7041 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and A. C. Wall, “Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,” Phys. Rev. Lett.117, no.2, 021601 (2016) [arXiv:1601.05416 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,

    D. R. Brill, “Multi - black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity,” Phys. Rev. D53, 4133-4176 (1996) [arXiv:gr-qc/9511022 [gr-qc]]

    1996 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,

    S. Aminneborg, I. Bengtsson, D. Brill, S. Holst and P. Peldan, “Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,” Class. Quant. Grav.15, 627-644 (1998) [arXiv:gr- qc/9707036 [gr-qc]]

    1998

  58. [66]

    Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,

    D. Brill, “Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions,” Lect. Notes Phys.537, 143 (2000) [arXiv:gr-qc/9904083 [gr-qc]]. 44

    2000 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Holography and Riemann surfaces,

    K. Krasnov, “Holography and Riemann surfaces,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.4, 929- 979 (2000) [arXiv:hep-th/0005106 [hep-th]]

    2000 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Holography and wormholes in 2+1 dimensions,

    K. Skenderis and B. C. van Rees, “Holography and wormholes in 2+1 dimensions,” Commun. Math. Phys.301, 583-626 (2011) [arXiv:0912.2090 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Multibound- ary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement,

    V. Balasubramanian, P. Hayden, A. Maloney, D. Marolf and S. F. Ross, “Multibound- ary Wormholes and Holographic Entanglement,” Class. Quant. Grav.31, 185015 (2014) [arXiv:1406.2663 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Tensor network quotient takes the vacuum to the thermal state,

    B. Czech, G. Evenbly, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, X. L. Qi, J. Sully and G. Vidal, “Tensor network quotient takes the vacuum to the thermal state,” Phys. Rev. B94, no.8, 085101 (2016) [arXiv:1510.07637 [cond-mat.str-el]]

    2016 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Exploring the Tensor Networks/AdS Correspondence,

    A. Bhattacharyya, Z. S. Gao, L. Y. Hung and S. N. Liu, “Exploring the Tensor Networks/AdS Correspondence,” JHEP08, 086 (2016) [arXiv:1606.00621 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Tensor Network Models of Multiboundary Wormholes,

    A. Peach and S. F. Ross, “Tensor Network Models of Multiboundary Wormholes,” Class. Quant. Grav.34, no.10, 105011 (2017) [arXiv:1702.05984 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Hot multiboundary worm- holes from bipartite entanglement,

    D. Marolf, H. Maxfield, A. Peach and S. F. Ross, “Hot multiboundary worm- holes from bipartite entanglement,” Class. Quant. Grav.32, no.21, 215006 (2015) [arXiv:1506.04128 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  66. [74]

    A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross- section,

    S. Dutta and T. Faulkner, “A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross- section,” JHEP03, 178 (2021) [arXiv:1905.00577 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Entanglement of purification through holographic duality,

    T. Takayanagi and K. Umemoto, “Entanglement of purification through holographic duality,” Nature Phys.14, no.6, 573-577 (2018) [arXiv:1708.09393 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Entan- glement of purification: from spin chains to holography,

    P. Nguyen, T. Devakul, M. G. Halbasch, M. P. Zaletel and B. Swingle, “Entan- glement of purification: from spin chains to holography,” JHEP01, 098 (2018) [arXiv:1709.07424 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  69. [77]

    A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk,

    B. Czech, L. Lamprou, S. McCandlish, B. Mosk and J. Sully, “A Stereoscopic Look into the Bulk,” JHEP07, 129 (2016) [arXiv:1604.03110 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Kinematic space and the orbit method,

    R. F. Penna and C. Zukowski, “Kinematic space and the orbit method,” JHEP07, 045 (2019) [arXiv:1812.02176 [hep-th]]. 45

    2019 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.