Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 53 references

Towards millimagnitude Photometry at the Vera Rubin Observatory: Aerosol Monitoring with Quadband Dispersed Imaging

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Aerosol haze shifts Rubin photometry by more than 5 millimagnitudes per airmass.

desk verdict Plausible method and new dataset, but the unreadable full text and an unaddressed DCR risk keep me from endorsing the conclusion yet. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17060 v1 pith:EOJIWJG7 submitted 2025-08-23 astro-ph.IM

Eske M. Pedersen , Christopher W. Stubbs , Merlin Fisher-Levine , Elana K. Urbach , Erik Dennihy , Patrick Ingraham This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.IM
keywords atmosphericaerosolsdifferentialextinctionmillimagnitudephotometryVeraC.RubinObservatoryquadbanddispersedimagingtransmissionauxiliarytelescopeforwardmodeling
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that time-variable atmospheric aerosols can be monitored from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory site using a quadband dispersing filter on the auxiliary telescope, and that the resulting extinction measurements matter for precision photometry. It reports differential extinction between the reddest and bluest of four spectral bands, covering 347 to 618 nm, that varies with time and can exceed $5\ \mathrm{mmag/airmass}$. If the aerosol signal is real and measurable this way, then Rubin's main-survey photometry cannot reach millimagnitude accuracy with a static atmospheric correction; the atmosphere must be forward-modeled per exposure. The stated goal is to turn these measurements into a transmission model that corrects Rubin images to millimagnitude precision.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quadband dispersed imaging configuration: a multiband filter combined with a disperser on the auxiliary telescope that spreads each stellar image into four notched spectral regions spanning 347 to 618 nm. Simple aperture photometry on those regions gives simultaneous fluxes in four colors, and the ratios of those fluxes as a function of airmass yield extinction differences between bands. The aerosol signal is isolated through the wavelength dependence of extinction: Rayleigh scattering, ozone absorption, and aerosol scattering each have distinct spectral signatures, so band-to-band differential extinction tracks aerosol content. That differential quantity is the load-bearing measurement, because common-mode effects such as overall throughput or gray cloud extinction cancel out.

What would settle it

Take the same quadband data and compare the derived differential extinction to an independently measured aerosol optical depth from a colocated solar photometer or lidar on the same nights; if the two time series disagree, or if the differential signal persists when aerosol loading is known to be constant, the aerosol attribution fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that differential extinction measured simultaneously in four notched spectral bands provides a robust monitor of atmospheric aerosol content above the observatory. Using simple aperture photometry on images dispersed by a quadband filter, the authors find clear temporal variations in extinction across the bands, with differences between the bluest and reddest bands exceeding $5\ \mathrm{mmag/airmass}$. They attribute this wavelength-dependent, time-variable extinction to changing aerosol loading and argue that a precise, per-exposure determination of atmospheric transmission would enable a forward-modeling route to millimagnitude photometry with Rubin data. The discovery, on the paper's own terms, is that aerosol-induced differential extinction is large enough and variable enough to be a limiting term for the stated precision goal.

Load-bearing premise

The paper attributes the measured band-to-band extinction variations to atmospheric aerosols without demonstrating that other wavelength-dependent, time-variable effects, such as differential refraction, chromatic seeing, flat-field residuals, or disperser throughput drift, do not contribute substantially to the signal.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A static atmospheric extinction model is insufficient for Rubin; aerosol loading must be treated as time-variable.
  • The auxiliary telescope can serve as a dedicated atmospheric monitor alongside the main survey without using survey time.
  • If the transmission model is accurate, per-image forward-model corrections can replace or supplement calibrations from standard stars.
  • Differential extinction at the level of several millimagnitudes per airmass sets the scale of the correction needed for wide-field photometry.
  • The 347 to 618 nm coverage means the method directly probes the blue-optical bands where aerosol effects are strongest.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the differential extinction slopes are converted to aerosol optical depth and an Angstrom exponent, the same data would also constrain aerosol particle size; the paper does not perform that inversion.
  • Editorial inference: comparing the extinction time series with an independent aerosol monitor, such as a solar photometer or lidar on site, would test the attribution cleanly; the paper does not report such a comparison.
  • Editorial inference: the technique could in principle be extended to redder bands to separate aerosol extinction from precipitable water vapor, but the current 347 to 618 nm coverage cannot do that.
  • Editorial inference: if the method matures, real-time aerosol corrections could be applied to Rubin exposures before coaddition, reducing systematic photometric scatter across nights; this would realize the forward-modeling goal the paper points toward.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes an observational approach to monitoring atmospheric aerosol extinction at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory Auxiliary Telescope, using a multiband filter and disperser to obtain simple aperture photometry in four spectral notches between 347 and 618 nm. The authors report temporal variations in the band-to-band extinction differences, which they attribute to variable atmospheric aerosol content, with red-blue differential extinction occasionally exceeding 5 mmag/airmass. They propose that such monitoring will support a forward-modeling approach to reaching millimagnitude photometric precision with Rubin data. The supplied full text is heavily corrupted by an encoding failure, so the data reduction, calibration, and error analysis cannot be verified from the submitted material.

Significance. If the measurement is free of uncontrolled systematics, the result is significant for Rubin's precision-photometry program: it indicates that aerosol-induced differential extinction is a time-variable term at the ~5 mmag/airmass level across the optical window, which is larger than the tolerance required for millimagnitude photometry and therefore must be included in atmospheric transmission models. The quadband dispersed-imaging scheme on the Auxiliary Telescope is simple, low-cost, and directly relevant to the Rubin observatory. The claim is falsifiable and not circular: it is a direct differential photometric measurement, with forward modeling stated as future work rather than as a fitted assumption. The main burden is therefore on excluding wavelength-dependent instrumental and atmospheric systematics and on presenting quantitative uncertainties.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim of >5 mmag/airmass differential extinction between the reddest and bluest band is reported without any uncertainty, calibration, or significance estimate. The phrase 'clear evidence' is not quantified, and no comparison to independent aerosol measurements (e.g., AERONET/CAMS) or standard-star photometry is mentioned. As stated, the result cannot be distinguished from a noise or systematic floor.
  2. [Abstract] The attribution to aerosol content is vulnerable to differential chromatic refraction (DCR). With bands at 347 nm and 618 nm and airmasses up to 2, the wavelength-dependent atmospheric refraction displaces the blue notch relative to the red notch by up to several arcseconds, which is comparable to the seeing disk. The abstract states that 'simple aperture photometry' was performed but gives no indication of whether the aperture positions were barycentric, whether a common centroid was used, or how DCR was corrected. If uncorrected, airmass-dependent aperture losses will produce a spurious differential extinction signal of the same order as the 5 mmag/airmass claim. The manuscript must demonstrate that DCR is either modeled or subdominant.
  3. [Full text] The supplied full text is corrupted to the point that no section, equation, or figure can be read reliably; the text also contains an apparent arXiv identifier for an unrelated paper (2508.17070v1 [cs.RO]). This makes it impossible to verify the data reduction, the photometric extraction, or the error analysis. The authors should provide a readable version before further review.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract's final sentence, 'We aspire to using precise determinations of the optical transmission of the atmosphere to enable a forward-modeling approach,' is vague; please specify the planned model parameters and the accuracy required for the forward model to reach millimagnitude photometry.
  2. [Abstract] The four spectral notches are described only by the overall range 347-618 nm; their center wavelengths, widths, and transmission efficiencies should be given or referenced to a figure, since the differential extinction signal depends directly on the exact band definitions.
  3. [Title/Abstract] The title uses 'millimagnitude' while the abstract uses 'mmag'; please spell out 'millimagnitude' at first use and state whether wavelengths are vacuum or air values.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the reported differential extinction is a direct photometric measurement, not a derived quantity fitted from an assumed aerosol model or imported via self-citation.

full rationale

The abstract and the readable portions of the manuscript report simple aperture photometry on four spectral bands between 347 and 618 nm, then state that the measured band-to-band extinction differences are attributed to atmospheric aerosol variability. No equation in the available text defines aerosol extinction in terms of the measured signal and then re-derives the measured signal from that definition; there is no fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or self-citation is invoked to force the conclusion. The forward-modeling program is explicitly an aspiration, not a result of this paper. Questions about whether differential chromatic refraction or other systematics contaminate the attribution are correctness or calibration concerns, not circularity, because the measurement remains independent of the aerosol interpretation being tested. Accordingly, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are identifiable from the abstract; the four spectral bands are a fixed instrument configuration, and the extinction differences are measured rather than fitted. Two domain assumptions are needed to take the reported signal at face value. No invented entities are proposed.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Temporal variations in the measured band-to-band extinction are attributable to aerosol content rather than other atmospheric constituents or instrumental effects.
    The abstract asserts this attribution without presenting supporting controls in the abstract; the full text is unreadable in the provided encoding.
  • domain assumption The auxiliary telescope and instrument throughput are stable over the observation period, so measured photometric changes reflect atmospheric transmission changes.
    Required for interpreting photometric variations as extinction changes; not verifiable from the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Towards millimagnitude Photometry at the Vera Rubin Observatory: Aerosol Monitoring with Quadband Dispersed Imaging." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EOJIWJG7

@misc{pith2026250817060,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Towards millimagnitude Photometry at the Vera Rubin Observatory: Aerosol Monitoring with Quadband Dispersed Imaging},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EOJIWJG7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17060}
}
read the original abstract

As the frontier of precision astronomical photometry continues to advance, correcting for time-variable atmospheric transmission becomes increasingly important. We describe an observational approach to monitoring optical attenuation due to atmospheric aerosols, using a multiband filter and disperser on the Auxiliary Telescope at the Vera C. Rubin Observatory. This configuration allows us to perform simple aperture photometry on four notched-out spectral regions, covering 347 to 618 nm. We see clear evidence of temporal variations in extinction across these bands, which we attribute to variation in the aerosol content of the atmosphere above the observatory. The observed differences in extinction between the reddest and bluest band can exceed 5 mmag/airmass, highlighting the importance of including variable aerosols in the transmission of the atmosphere. We aspire to using precise determinations of the optical transmission of the atmosphere to enable a forward-modeling approach to achieving mmag photometric precision with Rubin data.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    * QŘoZK.[d Rn1g* UW!rۚGn[* և / = x`L6-w@m[ <O>d y #

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt \@twocolumntrue 12pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key o...

    work page 2017

  4. [4]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, title Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy , , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  5. [5]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, title The Astropy Project: Building an Open-science Project and Status of the v2.0 Core Package , , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  6. [6]

    M., Lim , P

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Lim , P. L., et al. 2022, title The Astropy Project: Sustaining and Growing a Community-oriented Open-source Project and the Latest Major Release (v5.0) of the Core Package , , 935, 167, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74 2022

  7. [7]

    2014, title MODTRAN6: a major upgrade of the MODTRAN radiative transfer code , in Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XX, ed

    Berk, A., Conforti, P., Kennett, R., et al. 2014, title MODTRAN6: a major upgrade of the MODTRAN radiative transfer code , in Algorithms and Technologies for Multispectral, Hyperspectral, and Ultraspectral Imagery XX, ed. M. Velez-Reyes & F. A. Kruse, Vol. 9088, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 90880H, 10.1117/12.2050433

    doi:10.1117/12.2050433 2014

  8. [8]

    2017, title Instrumental response model and detrending for the Dark Energy Camera, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 129, 114502

    Bernstein, G., Abbott, T., Desai, S., et al. 2017, title Instrumental response model and detrending for the Dark Energy Camera, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 129, 114502

    work page 2017

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    H., & Shaw, M

    Blake, C. H., & Shaw, M. M. 2011, title Measuring NIR Atmospheric Extinction Using a Global Positioning System Receiver, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 123, 1302

    2011

  2. [10]

    C., Hubeny , I., & Rauch , T

    Bohlin , R. C., Hubeny , I., & Rauch , T. 2020, title New Grids of Pure-hydrogen White Dwarf NLTE Model Atmospheres and the HST/STIS Flux Calibration , , 160, 21, 10.3847/1538-3881/ab94b4

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    2017, title Forward global photometric calibration of the dark energy survey, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 41

    Burke, D., Rykoff, E., Allam, S., et al. 2017, title Forward global photometric calibration of the dark energy survey, The Astronomical Journal, 155, 41

    2017

  4. [12]

    L., Axelrod, T., Blondin, S., et al

    Burke, D. L., Axelrod, T., Blondin, S., et al. 2010, title Precision determination of atmospheric extinction at optical and near-infrared wavelengths, The Astrophysical Journal, 720, 811

    2010

  5. [13]

    L., Saha, A., Claver, J., et al

    Burke, D. L., Saha, A., Claver, J., et al. 2013, title All-weather calibration of wide-field optical and NIR surveys, The Astronomical Journal, 147, 19

    2013

  6. [14]

    2013, title Atmospheric extinction properties above Mauna Kea from the Nearby SuperNova Factory spectro-photometric data set, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 549, A8

    Buton, C., Copin, Y., Aldering, G., et al. 2013, title Atmospheric extinction properties above Mauna Kea from the Nearby SuperNova Factory spectro-photometric data set, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 549, A8

    2013

  7. [15]

    W., Deustua, S., Guyonnet, A., et al

    Coughlin, M. W., Deustua, S., Guyonnet, A., et al. 2018, title Testing of the LSST's photometric calibration strategy at the CTIO 0.9 meter telescope, in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems VII, Vol. 10704, SPIE, 753--765

    2018

  8. [16]

    2006, title LIDAR for measuring atmospheric extinction, in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, Vol

    Dawsey, M., Gimmestad, G., Roberts, D., et al. 2006, title LIDAR for measuring atmospheric extinction, in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, Vol. 6270, SPIE, 453--462

    2006

  9. [17]

    F., Holben, B

    Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., et al. 1999, title Wavelength dependence of the optical depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 104, 31333, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900923

    1999 doi

  10. [18]

    2008, title The LSST camera overview: design and performance, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, Vol

    Gilmore, K., Kahn, S., Nordby, M., et al. 2008, title The LSST camera overview: design and performance, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, Vol. 7014, SPIE, 167--177

    2008

  11. [19]

    2019, title Local monitoring of atmospheric transparency from the NASA MERRA-2 global assimilation system, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 8, 1950013

    Guyonnet, A., Dagoret-Campagne, S., & Mondrik, N. 2019, title Local monitoring of atmospheric transparency from the NASA MERRA-2 global assimilation system, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 8, 1950013

    2019

  12. [20]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, title Array programming with NumPy , Nature, 585, 357, 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  13. [21]

    N., Eck, T

    Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I. a., et al. 1998, title AERONET—A federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote sensing of environment, 66, 1

    1998

  14. [22]

    W., et al

    Ingraham, P., Fagrelius, P., Stubbs, C. W., et al. 2022, title The Vera C. Rubin Observatory 8.4 m telescope calibration system status, in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IX, Vol. 12182, SPIE, 272--285

    2022

  15. [23]

    M., Tyson, J

    Ivezi \'c , Z ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, title LSST: from science drivers to reference design and anticipated data products, The Astrophysical Journal, 873, 111

    2019

  16. [24]

    2017, title Results from STA/ITL fully depleted CCDs for LSST, Journal of Instrumentation, 12, C03080

    Lesser, M., & Ouellette, D. 2017, title Results from STA/ITL fully depleted CCDs for LSST, Journal of Instrumentation, 12, C03080

    2017

  17. [25]

    H., Nidever, D., & Halverson, S

    Li, D., Blake, C. H., Nidever, D., & Halverson, S. P. 2017, title Temporal Variations of Telluric Water Vapor Absorption at Apache Point Observatory, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 130, 014501

    2017

  18. [26]

    L., et al

    Li, T., DePoy, D., Marshall, J. L., et al. 2014, title Monitoring the atmospheric throughput at Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory with aTmCam, in Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy V, Vol. 9147, SPIE, 2194--2205

    2014

  19. [27]

    2012, title aTmcam: a simple atmospheric transmission monitoring camera for sub 1\

    Li, T., DePoy, D., Kessler, R., et al. 2012, title aTmcam: a simple atmospheric transmission monitoring camera for sub 1\

    2012

  20. [28]

    2016, title Assessment of systematic chromatic errors that impact sub-1\

    Li, T., DePoy, D., Marshall, J., et al. 2016, title Assessment of systematic chromatic errors that impact sub-1\

    2016

  21. [29]

    2015, title Atmospheric effects in astroparticle physics experiments and the challenge of ever greater precision in measurements, Astroparticle Physics, 60, 54

    Louedec, K. 2015, title Atmospheric effects in astroparticle physics experiments and the challenge of ever greater precision in measurements, Astroparticle Physics, 60, 54

    2015

  22. [30]

    T., Stubbs, C

    McGraw, J. T., Stubbs, C. W., Zimmer, P. C., Fraser, G. T., & Vivekanandan, J. 2009, title Measurement astrophysics (MAP) first steps: A new decade of ground-based photometric precision and accuracy, Astro2010: The Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, Technology Developm...

    2009

  23. [31]

    Mondrik, N. P. 2020, title Calibration Hardware and Methodology for Large Photometric Surveys, PhD thesis, Harvard University

    2020

  24. [32]

    2021, title A transmission hologram for slitless spectrophotometry on a convergent telescope beam

    Moniez, M., Neveu, J., Dagoret-Campagne, S., et al. 2021, title A transmission hologram for slitless spectrophotometry on a convergent telescope beam. 1. Focus and resolution, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 506, 5589

    2021

  25. [33]

    2025, Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2, https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/gmao-products/merra-2/

    NASA. 2025, Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2, https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/gmao-products/merra-2/

    2025

  26. [34]

    2023, title Slitless spectrophotometry with forward modelling: principles and application to atmospheric transmission measurement, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04898

    Neveu, J., Br \'e maud, V., Antilogus, P., et al. 2023, title Slitless spectrophotometry with forward modelling: principles and application to atmospheric transmission measurement, arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.04898

    2023 arXiv

  27. [35]

    2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    pandas development team, T. 2020, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas, latest Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.3509134

    2020 doi

  28. [36]

    2011, title Optical atmospheric extinction over Cerro Paranal, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 527, A91

    Patat, F., Moehler, S., O'Brien, K., et al. 2011, title Optical atmospheric extinction over Cerro Paranal, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 527, A91

    2011

  29. [37]

    C., et al

    Peretz, E., Hamilton, C., Mather, J. C., et al. 2021, title ORCAS--orbiting configurable artificial star mission architecture, in UV/Optical/IR Space Telescopes and Instruments: Innovative Technologies and Concepts X, Vol. 11819, SPIE, 26--40

    2021

  30. [38]

    1999, title Measurements of and from 42 high-redshift supernovae, The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565

    Perlmutter, S., Aldering, G., Goldhaber, G., et al. 1999, title Measurements of and from 42 high-redshift supernovae, The Astrophysical Journal, 517, 565

    1999

  31. [39]

    1992, title Atmospheric extinction and meteorological conditions-A long time photometric study, Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol

    Reimann, H.-G., & Beyersdorfer, S. 1992, title Atmospheric extinction and meteorological conditions-A long time photometric study, Astronomy and Astrophysics (ISSN 0004-6361), vol. 265, no. 1, p. 360-369., 265, 360

    1992

  32. [40]

    G., Filippenko, A

    Riess, A. G., Filippenko, A. V., Challis, P., et al. 1998, title Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, The astronomical journal, 116, 1009

    1998

  33. [41]

    W., & Brown, Y

    Stubbs, C. W., & Brown, Y. J. 2015, title Precise astronomical flux calibration and its impact on studying the nature of the dark energy, Modern Physics Letters A, 30, 1530030

    2015

  34. [42]

    W., & Tonry, J

    Stubbs, C. W., & Tonry, J. L. 2006, title Toward 1\

    2006

  35. [43]

    W., Vaz, A., Fraser, G

    Stubbs, C. W., Vaz, A., Fraser, G. T., et al. 2015, title Comparison of MODTRAN5 atmospheric extinction predictions with narrowband astronomical flux observations, in Infrared Remote Sensing and Instrumentation XXIII, Vol. 9608, SPIE, 214--223

    2015

  36. [44]

    W., High, F

    Stubbs, C. W., High, F. W., George, M. R., et al. 2007, title Toward more precise survey photometry for PanSTARRS and LSST: measuring directly the optical transmission spectrum of the atmosphere, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 119, 1163

    2007

  37. [45]

    L., Kent, S., Richmond, M., et al

    Tucker, D. L., Kent, S., Richmond, M., et al. 2006, title The sloan digital sky survey monitor telescope pipeline, Astronomische Nachrichten: Astronomical Notes, 327, 821

    2006

  38. [46]

    Rubin Observatory Science Pipelines Developers

    Vera C. Rubin Observatory Science Pipelines Developers . 2025, The LSST Science Pipelines Software: Optical Survey Pipeline Reduction and Analysis Environment , Project Science Technical Note PSTN-019, Vera C. Rubin Observatory , 10.71929/rubin/2570545

    2025

  39. [47]

    Villanueva, G., Smith, M., Protopapa, S., Faggi, S., & Mandell, A. 2018, title Planetary Spectrum Generator: An accurate online radiative transfer suite for atmospheres, comets, small bodies and exoplanets, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer, 217, 86–1...

    2018 doi

  40. [48]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, title SciPy 1.0: Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , Nature Methods, 17, 261, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    2000, title The SIMBAD astronomical database

    Wenger , M., Ochsenbein , F., Egret , D., et al. 2000, title The SIMBAD astronomical database. The CDS reference database for astronomical objects , , 143, 9, 10.1051/aas:2000332

    2000 doi

  42. [50]

    Wood-Vasey, W., Perrefort, D., & Baker, A. D. 2022, title GPS Measurements of Precipitable Water Vapor Can Improve Survey Calibration: A Demonstration from KPNO and the Mayall z-band Legacy Survey, The Astronomical Journal, 163, 283

    2022

  43. [51]

    T., Genet, R

    Young, A. T., Genet, R. M., Boyd, L. J., et al. 1991, title Precise automatic differential stellar photometry, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 103, 221

    1991

  44. [52]

    T., Zirzow, D

    Zimmer, P., McGraw, J. T., Zirzow, D. C., et al. 2012, title New instruments to calibrate atmospheric transmission, in Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes IV, Vol. 8444, SPIE, 573--584

    2012

  45. [53]

    C., McGraw, J., Gimmestad, G., et al

    Zimmer, P. C., McGraw, J., Gimmestad, G., et al. 2006, title ALE: Astronomical LIDAR for Extinction, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 209, 154--04

    2006

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.