Recognition: unknown
PosterGen: Aesthetic-Aware Multi-Modal Paper-to-Poster Generation via Multi-Agent LLMs
read the original abstract
Multi-agent systems built upon large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in tackling complex compositional tasks. In this work, we apply this paradigm to the paper-to-poster generation problem, a practical yet time-consuming process faced by researchers preparing for conferences. While recent approaches have attempted to automate this task, most neglect core design and aesthetic principles, resulting in posters that require substantial manual refinement. To address these design limitations, we propose PosterGen, a multi-agent framework that mirrors the workflow of professional poster designers. It consists of four collaborative specialized agents: (1) Parser and Curator agents extract content from the paper and organize storyboard; (2) Layout agent maps the content into a coherent spatial layout; (3) Stylist agents apply visual design elements such as color and typography; and (4) Renderer composes the final poster. Together, these agents produce posters that are both semantically grounded and visually appealing. To evaluate design quality, we introduce a vision-language model (VLM)-based rubric that measures layout balance, readability, and aesthetic coherence. Experimental results show that PosterGen consistently matches in content fidelity, and significantly outperforms existing methods in visual designs, generating posters that are presentation-ready with minimal human refinements.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Narrative-Driven Paper-to-Slide Generation via ArcDeck
ArcDeck models paper-to-slide generation as narrative reconstruction using discourse parsing and multi-agent refinement, plus a new ArcBench benchmark, to improve flow and coherence over direct summarization.
-
Quantifying Trust: Financial Risk Management for Trustworthy AI Agents
The paper introduces the Agentic Risk Standard (ARS) as a payment settlement framework that delivers predefined compensation for AI agent execution failures, misalignment, or unintended outcomes.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.