Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 143 references

Role of cosmic voids and their matter properties in shaping wormhole geometry in generalized geometry-matter coupling gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the measured density profile of cosmic voids can be transplanted into a generalized gravity theory to produce exact, traversable wormholes that repel light rather than capturing it.

desk verdict A coherent exact wormhole construction in f(R,L_m,T) using the Hamaus void profile, undermined by a false asymptotic-flatness claim and a scale mismatch that invalidates the advertised void-shaped geometry. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17492 v1 pith:MFG5Y3E6 submitted 2025-08-24 gr-qc

A. Errehymy , S. Hansraj This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83D0583C15 PACS 04.50.Kd04.20.Jb
keywords cosmicvoidswormholesf(RL_mT)gravitytraversableenergyconditionsgravitationallensingvoiddensityprofileshapefunction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the measured density profile of cosmic voids, vast underdense regions of the universe, can serve as the matter source for a new exact family of static, traversable wormholes in the linear f(R,L_m,T) gravity R+eta L_m + chi T. On a sympathetic reading, once the void profile is inserted into the shape-function equation X' = kappa $r^{2}$ rho, the resulting hypergeometric shape function satisfies the throat, flare-out, and asymptotic-flatness conditions for a chosen parameter set. If the construction holds, wormholes built from void-like matter would need less exotic matter than their general-relativistic counterparts, and they would deflect light outward rather than inward. The paper also claims the configuration is stable in the TOV sense and that the void contrast parameter delta_c controls where energy conditions are violated.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the shape function X(r) obtained by integrating X' = kappa $r^{2}$ rho with rho equal to the universal void density profile of Eq. (1). The integration yields a closed form built from Gauss hypergeometric functions 2F1, with the throat condition fixing the integration constant. This shape function, through the simplified field equations X' = kappa $r^{2}$ rho, -X = kappa $r^{3}$ P_r, and X - X'r = 2 kappa $r^{3}$ P_t, determines the pressures and therefore every energy condition, the lensing integral in Eq. (34), the TOV force balance, and the exoticity and anisotropy parameters.

What would settle it

Integrate the shape-function equation with the same universal void profile but stop at r = r_sv and match the interior to a vacuum exterior; if the resulting deflection angle at the throat turns positive or the flare-out condition fails, the paper's central claim would not survive. A simpler independent check is to recompute the deflection integral in Eq. (34) using the proper-coordinate transformation l(r) and verify that the throat is indeed the only photon sphere for the stated parameter set.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a universal cosmic void density profile can be inserted into the field equations of the linear f(R,L_m,T) model to yield an exact wormhole shape function, written as Eq. (23). The shape function is claimed to meet all three standard traversability criteria: throat condition X(r0)=r0, flare-out X'(r0)<1, and asymptotic flatness X/r -> 0. With the representative parameter set delta_c=-0.9, r0=0.75, $\alpha$=3.75, $\beta$=6.5, rho_a=$10^{-5}$, r_sc=75, r_sv=95, the paper reports positive energy density, radial null energy condition satisfied for delta_c in (-0.925,0], tangential null energy condition satisfied at and beyond the throat, and a negative deflection angle, i.e., repulsive gravitational lensing. A further consequence claimed is that the exoticity parameter is negative, indicating a transition from exotic to ordinary matter away from the throat.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on the assumption that a density profile measured for cosmic voids tens of megaparsecs across, with its fitted parameters, can be applied quantitatively to the matter content of a wormhole throat at the kilometre scale and integrated unchanged all the way to infinity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The void contrast parameter delta_c becomes a dial for energy-condition behaviour: radial NEC holds for delta_c in (-0.925, 0] and fails closer to -1, so voids with moderate contrast require less exotic matter.
  • If the solution is correct, a traversable wormhole sourced by void-like density would lens background sources with a negative deflection angle, producing image patterns opposite to black hole lensing.
  • The TOV analysis implies the wormhole can be held open by a balance of hydrostatic and anisotropic forces alone, since the gravitational force vanishes at constant redshift.
  • The negative exoticity parameter suggests the matter transitions from whatever supports the throat to ordinary matter as the radius increases, softening the usual objection that traversable wormholes require exotic matter everywhere.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper integrates the void profile from r0 out to infinity, but a physical cosmic void ends near r_sv; a natural extension is to truncate the profile at the void edge and match the interior to an exterior vacuum solution, which could alter the asymptotics and the sign of the deflection angle.
  • The profile parameters r_sc=75 and r_sv=95 are calibrated for voids tens of megaparsecs across, while the throat sits at r0=0.75 km with rho_a in km^-2; a units-and-scales consistency check on whether void matter could support such a structure would sharpen the claim.
  • The predicted repulsive lensing is testable in principle: one could compute magnification and image positions for a source behind such a wormhole and search existing microlensing surveys for the unusual 'missing arc' or asymmetry signatures described in the paper.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs exact static, spherically symmetric traversable wormhole solutions in the linear f(R,L_m,T)=R+ηL_m+χT gravity theory by identifying the wormhole matter energy density with the Hamaus universal cosmic void density profile. With a constant redshift function Φ, the field equations reduce to a simple system in which the shape function satisfies X'=κr²ρ; integrating Eq. (22) with the throat condition X(r0)=r0 yields the closed-form shape function in Eq. (23) involving hypergeometric functions. The paper claims that this shape function satisfies the Morris-Thorne throat, flare-out, and asymptotic flatness conditions, that for δc=-0.9 the energy density is positive and the energy-condition violations are mitigated, that the TOV equilibrium holds, and that gravitational lensing yields a negative (repulsive) deflection angle. The work also examines the exoticity parameter, anisotropy, and embedding diagrams.

Significance. If the central claims were correct, the paper would provide a new exact wormhole family in which a cosmologically calibrated matter profile, rather than ad hoc exotic matter, shapes the geometry and weakens energy-condition violations. The reduction of the f(R,L_m,T) field equations to the compact system (19)-(21) is clean, and the closed-form integration of the shape function is a nontrivial technical step worth acknowledging. However, the advertised asymptotic flatness and repulsive-lensing results fail for the stated solution, and the physical transplantation of a Mpc-scale void profile to a kilometer-scale wormhole is not justified. The manuscript's main positive contributions are therefore not realized in the solution as presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [§IV, Eq. (23) and Eq. (3)] The solution is not asymptotically flat for the parameter set used. Since the Hamaus profile (1) tends to ρ_a>0 as r→∞ when β>α, Eq. (19) gives X'∼κρ_a r² and hence X∼(κρ_a/3)r³, so X/r∼(κρ_a/3)r² diverges. This violates the paper's own asymptotic flatness condition lim_{r→∞}X/r=0 stated in Eq. (3). The text after Fig. 1 claims that X/r approaches zero as r→∞, but the plotted range is only r≲2.5 km; the asymptotic region is not shown and behaves in the opposite manner. This is not a cosmetic issue: all subsequent claims about the spacetime being asymptotically flat, and any integral over r to infinity, depend on this condition.
  2. [§V, Eq. (34) and Fig. 7] The lensing deflection angle α(rtp) is evaluated through Eq. (34) with upper limit r=∞, but the integrand contains √(1-X/r), and since X/r diverges as r², the integral is not convergent for large r. The numerical content of Fig. 7 is consistent with this failure: the plotted values include -9223372036854775808, the standard 64-bit signed integer overflow sentinel, and the color-bar entries are of order -10^153. These are not finite, negative deflection angles; they are artifacts of a numerically diverging integral. The claim that the wormhole repels light is therefore not supported by the model.
  3. [§II, Eq. (1) and §IV after Eq. (22)] The Hamaus universal density profile is an empirical fit to cosmic voids with radii of tens of megaparsecs, characterized by r_sc and r_sv in Mpc. Here the same functional form is imposed as the wormhole energy density for r∈[0.75,∞) with r in kilometers and r_sc=75, r_sv=95. The paper provides no physical or mathematical argument that this profile applies at centimeter-to-kilometer scales or that ρ_a remains a positive constant at infinity in a compact-object context. If the profile is intended to describe only the interior of a finite void, the solution must be truncated at the void boundary and matched to an exterior vacuum or cosmological spacetime; no such matching is given. This undermines the physical interpretation of the solution as a wormhole sourced by cosmic-void matter.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§IV, energy conditions text] The statement that 'both conditions X'<1 and X/r<1 hold for all r greater than r0' is not supported by the asymptotic behavior derived from Eq. (19); the claim should be restricted to the numerically explored range r≲2.5 km.
  2. [§III, around Eq. (15)] The choice L_m=-ρ is introduced without discussion; since the field equations depend on this identification, it should be stated explicitly and justified in the text.
  3. [Figures 3-8] The density and pressure quantities are labeled in units of km^{-2}, which is unconventional; with G=c=1 the dimension is length^{-2}, but the relationship between the plotted values and the input parameters (in particular ρ_a=0.00001) should be clarified.
  4. [Fig. 7] The figure caption and color bar contain formatting errors, including spaces in numbers, '6.8×10. 153', and the axis label 'rTurning Point'; these should be corrected.
  5. [Eq. (42)] The expression for the exoticity parameter Ω_Exoticity appears to have a mismatched bracket at the end, making the formula ambiguous; it should be rewritten with balanced parentheses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

Derivation is a self-contained solve of the field equations with an externally fitted void profile; no load-bearing circular step.

full rationale

The construction is not circular: Eq. (19) is the linear f(R,L_m,T) field equation with constant redshift, and Eq. (22) substitutes the Hamaus void profile (Eq. (1)), an external empirical input from Hamaus et al. [83]. Eq. (23) is then the explicit integral of that input, with the throat condition fixing only the integration constant. The pressure components (Eqs. (25)-(26)), energy conditions (Eqs. (30)-(32)), lensing integral (Eq. (34)), TOV forces, and anisotropy/exoticity parameters are all computed from the resulting metric rather than used to define it. The statement rho+P_r+2P_t=0 is an algebraic identity of Eqs. (19)-(21) and is presented as a consistency remark, not as a load-bearing prediction. The advertised 'influence' of voids on the wormhole geometry is the expected consequence of choosing that density profile as the source; this is exact-solution construction, not a fitted parameter being renamed as a prediction. The self-citations in the reference list supply context or prior applications and are not the load-bearing justification for Eq. (23). I therefore find no circularity. A separate mathematical concern, that the profile tends to rho_a>0 at infinity so X/r does not tend to zero for the plotted parameters, is a correctness issue rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All input numbers are listed: the void profile parameters (δc, α, β, r_sc, r_sv, ρ_a), the throat radius, and the theory couplings. None of these are derived from the target claims; they are chosen or taken from the literature. The central ansatz, that the Hamaus void profile is the wormhole matter density on kilometer scales to infinity, is the key unproven input.

free parameters (9)
  • η (λ) = 0.75
    Coupling of the matter Lagrangian in f(R,L_m,T); chosen for all plots.
  • χ = 0.75
    Coupling of the trace T; chosen for all plots.
  • δc = -0.9 (scanned in [-1,0])
    Void central density contrast; controls the energy-condition results.
  • α = 3.75
    Inner slope of the Hamaus void profile; chosen for the numerical model.
  • β = 6.5
    Outer slope of the Hamaus void profile; chosen for the numerical model.
  • r_sc = 75
    Compensation scale of the void profile; applied to the wormhole without unit matching.
  • r_sv = 95
    Void radius scale; used as a km-scale input in plots but taken from Mpc-scale cosmological voids.
  • ρ_a = 0.00001 km^-2
    Mean density scale in geometrized units; sets the overall amplitude of the density and shape function.
  • r0 = 0.75 km
    Wormhole throat radius; fixes the integration constant in Eq. (23).
assumptions (6)
  • ad hoc to paper Φ(r)=constant redshift function
    Adopted in Sec. III to eliminate horizon formation and simplify the field equations; affects lensing and force balance.
  • domain assumption Lm=-ρ
    Standard choice in f(R,L_m,T) literature, used to obtain Eqs. (16)-(18).
  • domain assumption Energy-momentum tensor is an anisotropic perfect fluid diag(-ρ,P_r,P_t,P_t)
    Defines the matter model in Eqs. (10)-(11).
  • ad hoc to paper Hamaus void profile Eq. (1) is the wormhole energy density for all r≥r0 to infinity
    Central ansatz in Eq. (22); the scale and scope of validity are not justified.
  • domain assumption Field equations of f(R,L_m,T) with linear model R+ηL_m+χT
    Framework from Haghani and Harko [128].
  • standard math Hypergeometric function integral representations used for the shape function
    Assumes standard 2F1 identities used to integrate the void profile.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Role of cosmic voids and their matter properties in shaping wormhole geometry in generalized geometry-matter coupling gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MFG5Y3E6

@misc{pith2026250817492,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Role of cosmic voids and their matter properties in shaping wormhole geometry in generalized geometry-matter coupling gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MFG5Y3E6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17492}
}
abstract

Cosmic voids are increasingly recognized as a promising tool for cosmological exploration. Their distribution and density profiles are highly responsive to alterations in gravitational theories, along with the influences of dark energy and neutrinos. Investigating voids offers a compelling opportunity to uncover signatures of alternative gravity models on a cosmological level. Voids span a notable range of density contrasts, from approximately -$1$ near their centers to around $0$ at their edges, where screening mechanisms become less effective. The primary objective of this study is to explore a novel model that introduces a new category of wormhole solutions by leveraging cosmic voids$-$vast underdense regions of the universe$-$for the first time. We focus on identifying new exact static wormhole models by proposing an alternative viewpoint on their matter content, rooted in the recently formulated $f(R,\mathcal{L}_m,T)$ theory of gravity. By developing a unique solution based on a universal density profile for voids, we examine crucial constraints on the parameters that dictate matter distribution and the structure of spacetime itself. Our results reveal how these cosmic voids significantly influence the geometry of wormholes, steepening the gradient toward the throat and mitigating violations of the null and weak energy conditions, particularly beyond their centers. We also highlight intriguing gravitational lensing effects, showing that this wormhole repels light rather than capturing it, creating a fascinating interaction between gravity and light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.17492 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The shape function for cosmic voids wormholes is characterized by a constant throat radius of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The spacetime-embedding diagrams for cosmic voids wormholes are characterized by a constant throat radius of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. For cosmic voids wormholes, the matter density, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. For cosmic voids wormholes, the NEC, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. For cosmic voids wormholes, the DEC, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. For cosmic voids wormholes, the anisotropic and hydrostatic forces, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. For cosmic voids wormholes, the deflection angle, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. For cosmic voids wormholes, the exoticity factor and anisotropy parameter, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D. J. Eisenstein et al. [SDSS], Astrophys. J. 633, 560-574 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    This means the throat of the wormhole be- haves like an unstable photon sphere

    [114]. This means the throat of the wormhole be- haves like an unstable photon sphere. It’s an interest- ing point that we can explore further by examining the angle α(rtp ), which shows how much the photon gets deflected: α(rtp ) =−π + 2 Z ∞ rtp eΦ q 1− ˆX′ r′ q r2 K2− e2Φ dr. (34) Here,K := L/E is known as the impact parameter. When we look at a constan...

  3. [3]

    S. W. Allen, D. A. Rapetti, R. W. Schmidt, H. Ebeling, G. Mor- ris and A. C. Fabian, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 383, 879-896 (2008)

    2008

  4. [4]

    Kowalski et al

    M. Kowalski et al. [Supernova Cosmology Project], Astrophys. J. 686, 749-778 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Aghanim et al

    N. Aghanim et al. [Planck], Astron. Astrophys. 641, A6 (2020) [erratum: Astron. Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020

  6. [6]

    Hinshaw et al

    G. Hinshaw et al. [WMAP], Astrophys. J. Suppl. 208, 19 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    A. G. Riess et al. [Supernova Search Team], Astron. J. 116, 1009- 1038 (1998)

    1998

  8. [8]

    Perlmutter et al

    S. Perlmutter et al. [Supernova Cosmology Project], Nature 391, 51-54 (1998)

    1998

Show all 143 references
  1. [9]

    Nojiri and S

    S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, eConf C0602061, 06 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    A. D. Dolgov and M. Kawasaki, Phys. Lett. B 573, 1-4 (2003)

    2003

  3. [11]

    Joyce, B

    A. Joyce, B. Jain, J. Khoury and M. Trodden, Phys. Rept. 568, 1-98 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P . G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, Phys. Rept. 513, 1-189 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    J., 1859, Annales de l’Observatoire de Paris, 5, 1

    Le Verrier U. J., 1859, Annales de l’Observatoire de Paris, 5, 1

  6. [14]

    Ishak, Living Rev

    M. Ishak, Living Rev. Rel. 22, no.1, 1 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    C. M. Will, Phys. Rev. D 71, 084027 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    Bertotti, L

    B. Bertotti, L. Iess and P . Tortora, Nature425, 374-376 (2003)

    2003

  9. [17]

    Hinterbichler and J

    K. Hinterbichler and J. Khoury, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 231301 (2010)

    2010

  10. [18]

    Khoury and A

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 171104 (2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    Brax and P

    P . Brax and P . Valageas, Phys. Rev. D90, no.2, 023507 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    Brax and P

    P . Brax and P . Valageas, Phys. Rev. D88, no.2, 023527 (2013)

    2013

  13. [21]

    Motohashi, A

    H. Motohashi, A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, no.12, 121302 (2013)

    2013

  14. [22]

    J. h. He, Phys. Rev. D 88, no.10, 103523 (2013)

    2013

  15. [23]

    Giocoli, M

    C. Giocoli, M. Baldi and L. Moscardini, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 481, no.2, 2813-2828 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Baldi, F

    M. Baldi, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, M. Viel, E. Puchwein, V . Springel and L. Moscardini, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.440, no.1, 75-88 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    Fukuda et al

    Y. Fukuda et al. [Super-Kamiokande], Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 1562- 1567 (1998)

    1998

  18. [26]

    Becker-Szendy, C

    R. Becker-Szendy, C. B. Bratton, D. Casper, S. T. Dye, W. Gajew- ski, M. Goldhaber, T. J. Haines, P . G. Halverson, D. Kielczewska and W. R. Kropp, et al. Phys. Rev. D 46, 3720-3724 (1992)

    1992

  19. [27]

    Harko and F

    T. Harko and F. S. N. Lobo, Eur. Phys. J. C 70, 373-379 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    S. N. Ahmed et al. [SNO], Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 181301 (2004)

    2004

  21. [29]

    Haghani and T

    Z. Haghani and T. Harko, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, no.7, 615 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Harko, F

    T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Phys. Rev. D 84, 024020 (2011)

    2011

  23. [31]

    Amendola, R

    L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. D 75, 083504 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Amendola, D

    L. Amendola, D. Polarski and S. Tsujikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 131302 (2007)

    2007

  25. [33]

    Y. Xu, G. Li, T. Harko and S. D. Liang, Eur. Phys. J. C 79, no.8, 708 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    E. L. B. Junior, M. E. Rodrigues, I. G. Salako and M. J. S. Houndjo, Class. Quant. Grav. 33, no.12, 125006 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Ilyas and Z

    M. Ilyas and Z. U. N. Shinwari, JHEAp 48, 100414 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    N ´ajera and A

    A. N ´ajera and A. Fajardo, JCAP 03, no.03, 020 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Errehymy, O

    A. Errehymy, O. Donmez, A. Syzdykova, K. Myrzakulov, S. Muminov, A. Dauletov and J. Rayimbaev, Annals Phys. 481, 170164 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    Errehymy, O

    A. Errehymy, O. Donmez, A. Syzdykova, K. Myrzakulov, S. Muminov, A. Dauletov and J. Rayimbaev, Annals Phys. 480, 170105 (2025)

    2025

  31. [39]

    Ilyas, Can

    M. Ilyas, Can. J. Phys. 102, no.6, 332-343 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Ilyas, S

    M. Ilyas, S. Khan, A. R. Athar, F. Khan, R. Iqbal, H. I. Alrebdi, K. S. Nisar and A. H. Abdel-Aty, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 22, no.05, 2450322 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Errehymy, A

    A. Errehymy, A. Banerjee, O. Donmez, M. Daoud, K. S. Nisar and A. H. Abdel-Aty, Gen. Rel. Grav.56, no.6, 76 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Errehymy, I

    A. Errehymy, I. Karar, K. Myrzakulov, A. Banerjee, A. H. Abdel- Aty and K. S. Nisar, JHEAp 44, 410-418 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Battista, S

    E. Battista, S. Capozziello and A. Errehymy, Eur. Phys. J. C 84, no.12, 1314 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Errehymy, A

    A. Errehymy, A. Banerjee, S. Hansraj, O. Donmez, K. S. Nisar and A. H. Abdel-Aty, Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.6, 573 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Ilyas and K

    M. Ilyas and K. Bamba, JCAP 10, 038 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    Ilyas, F

    M. Ilyas, F. Khan, I. Ahmad, R. Iqbal and S. Khan, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 138, no.10, 880 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    A. R. Athar, M. Ilyas and B. Masud, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 20, no.01, 2350003 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Ilyas and R

    M. Ilyas and R. Iqbal, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 20, no.13, 2350230 (2023)

    2023

  41. [49]

    S. A. Gregory, L. A. Thompson, Astrophys. J., 222, 784 (1978)

    1978

  42. [50]

    J ˆoeveer, J

    M. J ˆoeveer, J. Einasto, and E. Tago, Spatial distribution of galax- ies and of clusters of galaxies in the southern galactic hemi- sphere. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 185, 357 (1978)

    1978

  43. [51]

    Jaber, M

    M. Jaber, M. Peper, W. A. Hellwing, M. A. Aragon-Calvo and O. Valenzuela, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527, no.2, 4087-4099 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    M. A. Aragon-Calvo and A. S. Szalay, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 428, 3409 (2013)

    2013

  45. [53]

    N. I. Libeskind, R. van de Weygaert, M. Cautun, B. Falck, E. Tempel, T. Abel, M. Alpaslan, M. A. Arag ´on-Calvo, J. E. Forero-Romero and R. Gonzalez, et al. Mon. Not. Roy. As- tron. Soc. 473, no.1, 1195-1217 (2018)

    2018

  46. [54]

    Cautun, R

    M. Cautun, R. van de Weygaert, B. J. T. Jones and C. S. Frenk, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.441, no.4, 2923-2973 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Alcock and B

    C. Alcock and B. Paczynski, Nature 281, 358-359 (1979)

    1979

  48. [56]

    Kaiser, Mon

    N. Kaiser, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 227, 1-27 (1987)

    1987

  49. [57]

    Flamm, Phys

    L. Flamm, Phys. Z. 17, 448 (1916)

    1916

  50. [58]

    R. K. Sachs and A. M. Wolfe, Astrophys. J. 147, 73-90 (1967)

    1967

  51. [59]

    C. W. Misner and J. A. Wheeler, Annals Phys. 2, 525-603 (1957)

    1957

  52. [60]

    Einstein and N

    A. Einstein and N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 48, 73-77 (1935)

    1935

  53. [61]

    H. G. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. 14, 104-118 (1973)

    1973

  54. [62]

    M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, Am. J. Phys. 56, 395-412 (1988)

    1988

  55. [63]

    Damour and S

    T. Damour and S. N. Solodukhin, Phys. Rev. D76, 024016 (2007)

    2007

  56. [64]

    Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking , (AIP Press, New York, 1995)

    M. Visser, Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking , (AIP Press, New York, 1995)

    1995

  57. [65]

    B. P . Abbott et al. [LIGO Scientific and Virgo], Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    These studies collectively highlight the need for more refined observational strate- gies to differentiate between black hole and wormhole candidates

    broadened this perspective by demonstrating that wormholes can exhibit a range of ringing behaviors— some that strongly resemble black holes and others that diverge significantly—depending on the underlying ge- ometry and matter content. These studies collectively highlight th...

    1978

  59. [67]

    Cardoso, E

    V . Cardoso, E. Franzin and P . Pani, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 171101 (2016) [erratum: Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 089902 (2016)]

    2016

  60. [68]

    R. A. Konoplya and A. Zhidenko, JCAP 12, 043 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Bambi, Phys

    C. Bambi, Phys. Rev. D 87, 107501 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    P . G. Nedkova, V . K. Tinchev and S. S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) no.12, 124019

    2013

  63. [71]

    Ohgami and N

    T. Ohgami and N. Sakai, Phys. Rev. D 91, 124020 (2015)

    2015

  64. [72]

    Shaikh and S

    R. Shaikh and S. Kar, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044037 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Jusufi and A

    K. Jusufi and A. ¨Ovg ¨un, Phys. Rev. D 97, no.2, 024042 (2018)

    2018

  66. [74]

    Shaikh, Phys

    R. Shaikh, Phys. Rev. D 98, 024044 (2018). 19

    2018

  67. [75]

    Shaikh, P

    R. Shaikh, P . Banerjee, S. Paul and T. Sarkar, Phys. Lett. B 789, 270-275 (2019) [erratum: Phys. Lett. B 791, 422-423 (2019)]

    2019

  68. [76]

    D. C. Dai and D. Stojkovic, Phys. Rev. D 100, 083513 (2019)

    2019

  69. [77]

    J. P . Luminet, Astron. Astrophys.75, 228-235 (1979)

    1979

  70. [78]

    Stuchlik and J

    Z. Stuchlik and J. Schee, Class. Quant. Grav. 27, 215017 (2010)

    2010

  71. [79]

    Stuchlik and J

    Z. Stuchlik and J. Schee, Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 195013 (2014)

    2014

  72. [80]

    Schee and Z

    J. Schee and Z. Stuchlik, JCAP 06 (2015), 048

    2015

  73. [81]

    Gyulchev, P

    G. Gyulchev, P . Nedkova, T. Vetsov and S. Yazadjiev, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.2, 024055

    2019

  74. [82]

    S. X. Tian and Z. H. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) no.6, 064011

    2019

  75. [83]

    Banerjee, S

    A. Banerjee, S. Hansraj, A. Pradhan and A. Errehymy, Chinese Physics C, 49, 015101 (2025)

    2025

  76. [84]

    R. K. Sheth and R. van de Weygaert, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 350, 517 (2004)

    2004

  77. [85]

    Hamaus, P

    N. Hamaus, P . M. Sutter and B. D. Wandelt, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 251302 (2014)

    2014

  78. [86]

    P . K. F. Kuhfittig, Eur. Phys. J. C74, no.99, 2818 (2014)

    2014

  79. [87]

    F. S. N. Lobo, Phys. Rev. D 71, 084011 (2005)

    2005

  80. [88]

    Y. C. Cai, N. Padilla and B. Li, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 451, no.1, 1036-1055 (2015)

    2015

  81. [89]

    Pisani, E

    A. Pisani, E. Massara, D. N. Spergel, D. Alonso, T. Baker, Y. C. Cai, M. Cautun, C. Davies, V . Demchenko and O. Dor ´e, et al. [arXiv:1903.05161 [astro-ph.CO]]

    1903 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Zubair, S

    M. Zubair, S. Waheed, Q. Muneer and M. Ahmad, Fortsch. Phys. 71, no.8-9, 2300018 (2023)

    2023

  83. [91]

    C. E. Mota, J. M. Z. Pretel and C. O. V . Flores, Eur. Phys. J. C84, no.7, 673 (2024)

    2024

  84. [92]

    J. A. S. Fortunato, P . H. R. S. Moraes, E. Brito, J. G. de Lima J ´unior and T. S. Guerini, Phys. Dark Univ.48, 101893 (2025)

    2025

  85. [93]

    P . H. R. S. Moraes, A. S. Agrawal and B. Mishra, Phys. Lett. B 855, 138818 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    Errehymy, Y

    A. Errehymy, Y. Khedif, M. Daoud, K. Myrzakulov, A. H. Abdel-Aty and K. S. Nisar, JHEAp 47, 100370 (2025)

    2025

  87. [95]

    R. P . Kirshner et al., Astrophys. J., 248, L57-L60 (1981)

    1981

  88. [96]

    de Lapparent, M

    V . de Lapparent, M. J. Geller, J. P . Huchra, Astrophys. J., 302, L1 (1986)

    1986

  89. [97]

    van de Weygaert, S

    R. van de Weygaert, S. Shandarin, E. Saar, and J. Einasto, in The Zeldovich Universe: Genesis and Growth of the Cosmic Web, IAU Symp., 308 (2016)

    2016

  90. [98]

    Pisani et al

    A. Pisani et al. Cosmic voids: a novel probe to shed light on our Universe. BAAS, 51, no. 3, 40, (2019)

    2019

  91. [99]

    Ceccarelli et al

    L. Ceccarelli et al. Clues on void evolution - I. Large-scale galaxy distributions around voids. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 434, no. 2, 1435-1442, (2013)

    2013

  92. [100]

    Cai et al

    Y.-C. Cai et al. A Possible Cold Imprint of Voids on the Mi- crowave Background Radiation. Astrophys. J., 786, no. 2, 110, (2014)

    2014

  93. [101]

    Cai et al

    Y.-C. Cai et al. The lensing and temperature imprints of voids on the cosmic microwave background. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 466, no. 3, 3364-3375, (2017)

    2017

  94. [102]

    J. M. Colberg et al. The Aspen-Amsterdam void finder compar- ison project. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 387, no. 2, 933-944, (2008)

    2008

  95. [103]

    Paz et al

    D. Paz et al. Clues on void evolution-II. Measuring density and velocity profiles on SDSS galaxy redshift space distortions. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 436, no. 4, 3480-3491, (2013)

    2013

  96. [104]

    Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity , arXiv: gr- qc/9712019 (1997)

    Sean M. Carroll, Lecture Notes on General Relativity , arXiv: gr- qc/9712019 (1997)

    1997

  97. [105]

    Hochberg and M

    D. Hochberg and M. Visser, Phys. Rev. D 58, 044021 (1998)

    1998

  98. [106]

    Hochberg, D., Visser, M.: Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 746 (1998)

    1998

  99. [107]

    Raychaudhuri, Phys

    A. Raychaudhuri, Phys. Rev. 98, 1123 (1955)

    1955

  100. [108]

    Capozziello, S

    S. Capozziello, S. Nojiri, S.D. Odintsov, Phys. Let. B 781, 99-106 (2018)

    2018

  101. [109]

    Godani, G.C

    N. Godani, G.C. Samanta, Ann. Phys. 429, 168460 (2021)

    2021

  102. [110]

    T.K. Dey, S. Sen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 953-962 (2008)

    2008

  103. [111]

    Tsukamoto, Phys

    N. Tsukamoto, Phys. Rev. D 94, 124001 (2016)

    2016

  104. [112]

    Virbhadra, G.F.R

    K.S. Virbhadra, G.F.R. Ellis, Phys. Rev. D 62, 084003 (2000)

    2000

  105. [113]

    Virbhadra, G.F.R

    K.S. Virbhadra, G.F.R. Ellis,, Phys. Rev. D 65, 103004 (2002)

    2002

  106. [114]

    Bozza, Gen

    V . Bozza, Gen. Relativ. Gravit.42, 2269-2300 (2010)

    2010

  107. [115]

    Bozza, Phys

    V . Bozza, Phys. Rev. D66, 103001 (2002)

    2002

  108. [116]

    Shaikh et al., JCAP 07, 028 (2019)

    R. Shaikh et al., JCAP 07, 028 (2019)

    2019

  109. [117]

    Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Ap- plications of the General Theory of Relativity (1972)

    S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Ap- plications of the General Theory of Relativity (1972)

    1972

  110. [118]

    Claudel, K.S

    C.M. Claudel, K.S. Virbhadra, G.F.R. Ellis, J. Math. Phys. 42, 818-838 (2001)

    2001

  111. [119]

    K. K. Nandi, Y. Z. Zhang, R. G. Cai and A. Panchenko, Phys. Rev. D 79, 024011 (2009)

    2009

  112. [120]

    T. K. Dey and S. Sen, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23, 953-962 (2008)

    2008

  113. [121]

    Tsukamoto and T

    N. Tsukamoto and T. Harada, Phys. Rev. D 95, no.2, 024030 (2017)

    2017

  114. [122]

    Perlick, Living Rev

    V . Perlick, Living Rev. Rel.7, 9 (2004)

    2004

  115. [123]

    Abe, Astrophys

    F. Abe, Astrophys. J. 725, 787-793 (2010)

    2010

  116. [124]

    Y. Toki, T. Kitamura, H. Asada and F. Abe, Astrophys. J.740, 121 (2011)

    2011

  117. [125]

    Safonova, D

    M. Safonova, D. F. Torres and G. E. Romero, Phys. Rev. D 65, 023001 (2002)

    2002

  118. [126]

    Perlick, O

    V . Perlick, O. Y. Tsupko and G. S. Bisnovatyi-Kogan, Phys. Rev. D 92, no.10, 104031 (2015)

    2015

  119. [127]

    Gorini et al., Phys

    V . Gorini et al., Phys. Rev. D78, 064064 (2008)

    2008

  120. [128]

    Kuhfittig, Fundamental J

    P .K.F. Kuhfittig, Fundamental J. Mod. Phys.14, 23-31 (2020)

    2020

  121. [129]

    Bronnikov, M.V

    K.A. Bronnikov, M.V . Skvortsova, A.A. Starobinsky, Grav. Cos- mol. 16, 216-222 (2010)

    2010

  122. [130]

    Haghani, T

    Z. Haghani, T. Harko, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 615 (2021)

    2021

  123. [131]

    M.Visser, Lorentzian Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1995)

    1995

  124. [132]

    Kuhfittig,Eur

    P .K.F. Kuhfittig,Eur. Phys. J. C 74, 2818 (2014)

    2014

  125. [133]

    Solanki, Z

    R. Solanki, Z. Hassan, P .K. Sahoo,Chin. J. Phys. 85, 74-88 (2023)

    2023

  126. [134]

    Jaybhaye, M

    L. Jaybhaye, M. Tayde, P .K. Sahoo, Commun. Theor. Phys. 76, 055402 (2024)

    2024

  127. [135]

    S. K. Maurya, J. Kumar, S. Kiroriwal and A. Errehymy, Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101564 (2024)

    2024

  128. [136]

    Errehymy, S

    A. Errehymy, S. K. Maurya, S. Hansraj, M. Mahmoud, K. S. Nisar and A. H. Abdel-Aty, Chin. J. Phys. 89, 56-68 (2024)

    2024

  129. [137]

    Godani, G.C

    N. Godani, G.C. Samanta,Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 30 (2020)

    2020

  130. [138]

    Godani, G.C

    N. Godani, G.C. Samanta, New Astronomy 80, 101399 (2020)

    2020

  131. [139]

    Deb, B.K

    D. Deb, B.K. Guha, Phys. Rev. D 97, 084026 (2018)

    2018

  132. [140]

    J. P . S. Lemos, F. S. N. Lobo and S. Quinet de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. D 68, 064004 (2003)

    2003

  133. [141]

    W. T. Kim, J. J. Oh and M. S. Yoon, Phys. Rev. D70, 044006 (2004)

    2004

  134. [142]

    Cattoen, T

    C. Cattoen, T. Faber and M. Visser, Class. Quant. Grav.22, 4189- 4202 (2005)

    2005

  135. [143]

    F. S. N. Lobo, F. Parsaei and N. Riazi, Phys. Rev. D 87, no.8, 084030 (2013)

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.