Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 76 references

Universal scaling of higher-order cumulants in quantum isotropic spin chains

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For the isotropic Heisenberg spin chain, the first four cumulants of spin transfer obey two distinct temporal scaling laws selected by the initial state: all orders scale as t^0.45 for helix-type states, versus t^0.65 and t^1.3 for domain-w

desk verdict Worth a serious referee, but the central 0.45 exponent for the 'anomalous diffusive' class is not yet established — the paper's own summary table says 1/2. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17535 v1 pith:MF7RV2EU submitted 2025-08-24 cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.str-elquant-ph

Shixian Jiang , Jianpeng Liu , Jianmin Yuan , Xi-Wen Guan , Yongqiang Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords higher-ordercumulantsfullcountingstatisticsisotropicHeisenbergchainKPZuniversalitysuperdiffusionanomalousdiffusionspinhelixdomainwall
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that in the one-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg model, the growth of the first four cumulants of spin polarization transfer and contrast is governed by only two universal scaling classes, selected by the initial state. For domain-wall-like (Ising-type) initial states the first two cumulants grow as t^0.65 while the third and fourth grow as t^1.3, with skewness and excess kurtosis values that deviate from the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang (KPZ) prediction. For spin-helix-like (XZ-type) states all four cumulants grow as t^0.45, with non-Gaussian standardized cumulants; the same exponent is recovered for genuine spin-helix states. The authors unify both behaviors by introducing multi-periodic domain-wall states that interpolate between the two experimental preparations, and confirm the scaling with two independent numerical approaches. If correct, higher-order cumulants become a sharp experimental probe for distinguishing transport universality classes that first-order measurements cannot separate.

What carries the argument

The central objects are the nth-order cumulants of two nonlocal observables—spin polarization transfer Pn and wavevector-resolved contrast Kn—extracted from connected n-point correlation functions of local magnetization. The unifying device is the multi-periodic domain-wall (MPDW) family of initial states, a product state whose local spin orientation is controlled by an amplitude ratio and phase difference; the Ising-type member reproduces domain-wall dynamics and the XZ-type member reproduces spin-helix dynamics. Cumulant growth is characterized by power laws |ΔPn|∝t^νn and by threshold-time scaling τ∝λ^{1/νn}, and standardized cumulants γ3 and γ4 (skewness and excess kurtosis) identify non

What would settle it

Simulate or measure the same cumulants at larger wavelength and system size so that the boundary-free window extends well beyond Jt ≈ 100, then check whether the fitted exponents stay at 0.45, 0.65, and 1.3 or drift. If ν1 for XZ-type/spin-helix states trends toward 1/2 while γ3 and γ4 trend toward zero, the anomalous-diffusion class is a transient; similarly, extending Ising-type data beyond Jt ≈ λ/2 should show whether γ3 moves toward the KPZ Tracy-Widom value instead of remaining near 0.224.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that higher-order cumulant dynamics in the isotropic Heisenberg spin chain is universal but initial-state dependent, and falls into exactly two classes captured by the first four cumulants. For domain-wall-like (Ising-type) initial states—including the pure domain wall—the spin polarization transfer cumulants obey |ΔP1|,|ΔP2| ∝ t^0.65 and |ΔP3|,|ΔP4| ∝ t^1.3; the standardized cumulants take skewness γ3≈0.224 and excess kurtosis γ4≈−0.093, values that agree with recent experiments and deviate from the KPZ/Tracy-Widom prediction. For spin-helix-like (XZ-type) initial states—including the genuine spin helix—all four cumulants obey |ΔPn| ∝ t^0.45 with γ3≈−0.359 and γ

Load-bearing premise

The extracted exponents are assumed to be true asymptotic power laws, but they are measured only in finite time windows bounded by boundary effects (Jt < λ/2 for Ising-type and Jt < λ/4 for XZ-type states); if longer-time simulations show a crossover, for instance 0.45 drifting toward 1/2, the claimed universality classes would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Spin-helix-type initial states (SH and XZ-type MPDW) give identical anomalous-diffusive exponents ν1=ν2=ν3=ν4≈0.45, with skewness γ3≈−0.359 and excess kurtosis γ4≈−0.503, so the higher-order cumulants are the only place the non-Gaussian nature shows up.
  • Domain-wall-type initial states (DW and Ising-type MPDW) give ν1=ν2≈0.65 and ν3=ν4≈1.3, with γ3≈0.224 and γ4≈−0.093, deviating from the KPZ/Tracy-Widom prediction for the fourth order.
  • The two scaling laws are confirmed through three independent extraction routes—spin polarization transfer, contrast threshold times, and subsystem fluctuations—so the classification is not an artifact of one observable.
  • Because the same exponents are obtained from spin-helix and XZ-type MPDW states, and from DW and Ising-type MPDW states, the MPDW initial states form a unified experimental platform for studying both universality classes.
  • The results settle, for these initial states, the open question of whether higher-order cumulants follow universal power laws in diffusive and superdiffusive spin dynamics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The ν≈0.45 class is a candidate new universality class distinct from normal diffusion (ν=1/2) and KPZ (ν=2/3); a decisive test would be whether the exponent survives simulation windows longer than the boundary-free limit used here.
  • Varying the MPDW amplitude ratio between 0 and 1 should interpolate between the two classes; if exponents vary continuously with this ratio, the classification is controlled by the initial state's transverse-spin content, not by integrability.
  • The same full-counting-statistics analysis could be transferred to fermionic or doped one-dimensional systems to ask whether spin and charge sectors carry different cumulant scaling signatures, extending the paper's suggested spin-charge separation direction.
  • The standardized cumulant plateaus are experimentally checkable: measuring γ3≈−0.359 and γ4≈−0.503 in spin-helix ultracold-atom setups over longer hold times would confirm the anomalous-diffusion class; drift toward zero would indicate preasymptotic transients.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies temporal scaling of the first four cumulants of spin polarization transfer and of the contrast in the isotropic Heisenberg spin chain, starting from domain-wall (DW), spin-helix (SH), and two families of multi-periodic domain-wall (MPDW) states. Using TDVP and full counting statistics, the authors claim two distinct dynamical classes: a superdiffusive class for DW/Ising-type MPDW initial states with ν1=ν2≈0.65 and ν3=ν4≈1.3, with standardized cumulants γ3≈0.224 and γ4≈−0.093 deviating from KPZ predictions; and an 'anomalous diffusive' class for SH/XZ-type MPDW states with ν1=ν2=ν3=ν4≈0.45 and strongly non-Gaussian γ3≈−0.359, γ4≈−0.503. The central claim is that higher-order cumulants reveal universal classes invisible to the first-order (magnetization) dynamics.

Significance. If the claimed exponents hold asymptotically, the paper would provide a valuable classification of higher-order fluctuation dynamics in an integrable quantum spin chain, going beyond the established KPZ/superdiffusive picture and giving explicit predictions for cold-atom and quantum-gas-microscope experiments. The work has clear strengths: it uses two independent numerical methods (TDVP and FCS), provides convergence tests for bond dimension, time step, and system size in the Supplemental Material, and obtains consistent results from polarization-transfer, contrast, and subsystem-fluctuation analyses. The main weakness is that the most novel exponent—ν≈0.45 for the 'anomalous diffusive' class—is extracted from short finite-time windows without statistical uncertainties, and it is internally inconsistent with the table in Fig. 1(e), which lists 1/2 for the same class. The distinction between 0.45 and 1/2 is load-bearing for the paper's central classification.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3 and SM S6/S7] The XZ-type 'anomalous diffusive' scaling ν1,2,3,4≈0.45 is extracted only from the gray windows Jt≲λ/4 (SM S6/S7), and the largest wavelength used is λ=96, so the fitting range is Jt≲24, i.e. less than 1.4 decades. No error bars, no correction-to-scaling fits, and no λ→∞ extrapolation are provided. Since ordinary diffusion would give ν=1/2, the data as presented cannot distinguish an asymptotic exponent 0.45 from a preasymptotic effective exponent produced by a diffusive process with scaling corrections. This is load-bearing for the claimed 'anomalous diffusive' class. Please provide a local-exponent analysis (e.g. ν(t) versus 1/t), fits with subleading corrections, and an estimate of the statistical uncertainty, or explicitly state the range of exponents compatible with the data.
  2. [Fig. 1(e)] There is a direct internal inconsistency in the central summary: the table in Fig. 1(e) lists the anomalous-diffusion exponents as '1/2 1/2 1/2 1/2', while the text and Fig. 3(b) report νn≈0.45 for the same class. This is not a cosmetic issue, because the entire novelty of the 'anomalous diffusive' class rests on the deviation from the standard diffusive exponent. The authors must decide which value is claimed, correct the table or the text, and explain why the 0.45 estimate is not merely a finite-time artifact.
  3. [Fig. 3(c)(d) and SM S7] The standardized cumulants γ3≈−0.359 and γ4≈−0.503 are reported without error bars or a quantitative statement of their time dependence. SM S7 shows that within the shaded 'boundary-free' regions these quantities evolve visibly with time and wavelength, especially for smaller λ. To support the claim that these are asymptotic non-Gaussian universal constants, the authors should define the fitting window, report the variation across λ and time in that window, and compare with the analogous uncertainty for the KPZ values. Otherwise the deviation from Gaussian statistics may again be a preasymptotic effect.
  4. [Figs. 2 and 3(a)] The same finite-window concern applies to the superdiffusive exponents: ν1,2≈0.65 and ν3,4≈1.3 are extracted from Jt≲λ/2, giving at most about 1.7 decades for λ=96, and no statistical errors are quoted. These values are close to the KPZ predictions 2/3 and 4/3. Without a quantitative fit that includes subleading corrections or a demonstration of stability over a wider time window, the claim that the third- and fourth-order exponents 'differ significantly' from KPZ rests mainly on the standardized cumulants, not on the exponents themselves. Please provide the same error analysis for the superdiffusive branch.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and main text] The word 'cumulantes' in the abstract (and 'latter' written as 'later' in the text) should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 2(b)] The caption calls the SH state 'diffusive' while quoting ν1≈0.45; if the authors maintain that 0.45 is a distinct 'anomalous diffusive' exponent, the caption should use that term consistently, otherwise readers will read 0.45 as a numerical approximation to 1/2.
  3. [SM S8/S9] The threshold-time extraction (decay to 0.4 for K1 and first maximum for K2,3,4) appears arbitrary; a brief statement of the sensitivity of νn to these thresholds would strengthen the analysis.
  4. [General] All figures show power-law guides without confidence intervals. Adding shaded fit ranges or quoted uncertainties would materially help the reader assess the 0.45 vs 1/2 and 0.65 vs 2/3 distinctions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central exponents and standardized cumulants are numerical observations, cross-checked by two independent methods and against external experiments; the acknowledged finite-time windows are a correctness limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's claims are empirical scaling laws extracted from TDVP and FCS simulations of the isotropic Heisenberg chain, not predictions derived from the claims themselves. The exponents ν1≈0.65, ν3,4≈1.3 for Ising-type MPDW states and ν1,2,3,4≈0.45 for XZ-type MPDW states are obtained by power-law fits to |ΔPn(λ,t)| and to the wavelength dependence of threshold times τ∝λ^{1/ν_n}; the two routes are independent observables from the same Hamiltonian and agree with each other, which is cross-validation rather than circularity (Figs. 2-4 and SM Figs. S6-S9). The MPDW states are deliberately constructed to interpolate between the known DW and SH states (SM Sec. II), but this is a modeling choice; the subsequent dynamics is computed from the full Heisenberg Hamiltonian, so the resulting cumulant scaling is not built into the initial-state ansatz. The standardized cumulant values γ3≈0.224, γ4≈-0.093 for Ising-type states and γ3≈-0.359, γ4≈-0.503 for XZ-type states are reported as observed values and are compared with, not fitted to, experiment [32,36] and KPZ references [27,40]. Self-citations present (e.g., Refs. [5,75] involving author X.-W. Guan) are contextual and not load-bearing. The manuscript itself flags its main limitation: in SM Sec. IV and main-text Fig. 3, the scaling analysis for XZ-type states is restricted to Jt<λ/4, and for the largest λ=96 this is Jt<24, less than 1.4 decades; the paper also notes that Fig. 1(e) lists the anomalous-diffusion exponents as 1/2 while the text reports ν≈0.45. These are genuine correctness risks about whether 0.45 is asymptotic or a preasymptotic transient, but they are not cases where a fitted parameter is renamed a prediction or where an input is equivalent to an output by construction. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central numerical observations rest on standard model assumptions and on the choice of finite-time analysis windows; no free parameters are tuned to force the claimed exponents, but the window bounds and threshold definitions are chosen post hoc and without sensitivity analysis.

free parameters (3)
  • Analysis window bounds (lambda/2 for Ising-type, lambda/4 for XZ-type) = lambda/2 and lambda/4
    The scaling exponents are extracted from these hand-selected time windows; the choice affects the fit and is not derived from theory.
  • Threshold values for relaxation time extraction = 0.4 for K1, first maximum for K2-4, 0.15 for subsystem fluctuations
    These conventions define tau and influence the resulting exponents, but no sensitivity to these choices is reported.
  • Standardization factor nc = 2L/lambda - 1 = nc integers
    Used to define averaged transfer cumulants for standardized values; a reasonable but arbitrary normalization choice.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The 1D isotropic Heisenberg Hamiltonian is the correct model for the experimental systems considered
    Standard model for ultracold atoms and quantum simulators used in cited experiments (e.g., Ref. 32,33,36).
  • domain assumption TDVP with MPS bond dimensions up to 1000 and L=96 yields converged dynamics in the studied time windows
    Supported by convergence tests in SM Section III, but not a mathematical proof and not checked beyond Jt=100.
  • domain assumption The initial product states are representative of the high-temperature (infinite temperature) ensemble
    Standard in the field, but the paper does not quantify the effective temperature or its effect on the exponents.
invented entities (1)
  • MPDW initial states (Ising-type and XZ-type)
    purpose: To interpolate between domain-wall and spin-helix states and unify the observed scaling behaviors
    These states are constructed for this paper; they are not found in nature or prior experiments, and no independent prediction is made from them.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Universal scaling of higher-order cumulants in quantum isotropic spin chains." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MF7RV2EU

@misc{pith2026250817535,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Universal scaling of higher-order cumulants in quantum isotropic spin chains},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MF7RV2EU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17535}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding universal behavior of far-from-equilibrium transport dynamics at a quantum many body level is a longstanding challenge. In particular, a full characterization of universal dynamics of nonlocal correlation functions still remains largely unknown. In this letter, we uncover universal scaling laws of higher-order cumulants in one-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg model, revealing anomalous behaviors of nonequilibrium dynamics exclusively accessible in higher-order correlations. By means of numerical simulations and full counting statistics, we determine the power laws of both the spin polarization transfer and contrast cumulants for different kinds of helix and domain-wall initial states. Building on such physical states, we unify the scaling behavior of the higher-order cumulants, giving rise to two types of dynamics: anomalous diffusive and superdiffusive. For the former, these higher cumulants show a deviation from Gaussian statistics, with the scaling exponents being identical for the first four orders. For the latter, however, we observe a breakdown of KPZ universality, with the exponents of the third and fourth orders differing significantly from those of the first two. Our results are also agreeable with recent experimental observations, advancing understanding of far-from-equilibrium transport phenomena.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.17535 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Cumulant scaling and its exponents in the isotropic Heisenberg spin chain. Far-from-equilibrium dynamics of spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. First-order cumulant of the isotropic Heisenberg [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Higher-order cumulants via contrast [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Higher-order cumulants of spin polarization transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. T. Landi, D. Poletti, and G. Schaller, Nonequilibrium boundary-driven quantum systems: Models, methods, and properties, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 045006 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Esposito, U

    M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequilib- rium fluctuations, fluctuation theorems, and counting statistics in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1665 (2009)

    2009

  3. [3]

    Polkovnikov, K

    A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalat- tore, Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed in- teracting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011)

    2011

  4. [4]

    Bertini, F

    B. Bertini, F. Heidrich-Meisner, C. Karrasch, T. Prosen, R. Steinigeweg, and M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Finite-temperature transport in one-dimensional quantum lattice models, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025003 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Guan and P

    X.-W. Guan and P. He, New trends in quantum inte- grability: recent experiments with ultracold atoms, Rep. Prog. Phys. 85, 114001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    R. E. Wyatt, Quantum dynamics with trajectories: In- troduction to quantum hydrodynamics, Int. App. Math., XXII, 408 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    V. B. Bulchandani, S. Gopalakrishnan, and E. Ilievski, Superdiffusion in spin chains, J. Stat. Mech. 2021, 084001 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    B. Ye, F. Machado, J. Kemp, R. B. Hutson, and N. Y. Yao, Universal kardar-parisi-zhang dynamics in inte- grable quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 230602 (2022)

    work page 2022

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Ilievski, J

    E. Ilievski, J. De Nardis, M. Medenjak, and T. Prosen, Superdiffusion in one-dimensional quantum lattice mod- els, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 230602 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Gopalakrishnan and R

    S. Gopalakrishnan and R. Vasseur, Kinetic theory of spin diffusion and superdiffusion in xxz spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 127202 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    De Nardis, M

    J. De Nardis, M. Medenjak, C. Karrasch, and E. Ilievski, Anomalous spin diffusion in one-dimensional antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 186601 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Scheie, N

    A. Scheie, N. Sherman, M. Dupont, S. Nagler, M. Stone, G. Granroth, J. Moore, and D. Tennant, Detection of kardar–parisi–zhang hydrodynamics in a quantum 6 heisenberg spin-1/2 chain, Nat. Phys. 17, 726 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    ˇZnidariˇ c, Spin transport in a one-dimensional anisotropic heisenberg model, Phys

    M. ˇZnidariˇ c, Spin transport in a one-dimensional anisotropic heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 220601 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    Gopalakrishnan, R

    S. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vasseur, and B. Ware, Anomalous relaxation and the high-temperature structure factor of xxz spin chains, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 116, 16250 (2019)

    2019

  7. [15]

    Gopalakrishnan and R

    S. Gopalakrishnan and R. Vasseur, Anomalous transport from hot quasiparticles in interacting spin chains, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 036502 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Ljubotina, M

    M. Ljubotina, M. ˇZnidariˇ c, and T. Prosen, Kardar-parisi- zhang physics in the quantum heisenberg magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 210602 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Kardar, G

    M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Dynamic scaling of growing interfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986)

    1986

  10. [18]

    Popkov, A

    V. Popkov, A. Schadschneider, J. Schmidt, and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Fibonacci family of dynamical universality classes, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 112, 12645 (2015)

    2015

  11. [19]

    De Nardis, B

    J. De Nardis, B. Doyon, M. Medenjak, and M. Panfil, Correlation functions and transport coefficients in gen- eralised hydrodynamics, J. Stat. Mech. 2022, 014002 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Ljubotina, L

    M. Ljubotina, L. Zadnik, and T. Prosen, Ballistic spin transport in a periodically driven integrable quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 150605 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Feldmeier, P

    J. Feldmeier, P. Sala, G. De Tomasi, F. Pollmann, and M. Knap, Anomalous diffusion in dipole- and higher-moment-conserving systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 245303 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Ljubotina, J.-Y

    M. Ljubotina, J.-Y. Desaules, M. Serbyn, and Z. Papi´ c, Superdiffusive energy transport in kinetically constrained models, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011033 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    Cecile, J

    G. Cecile, J. De Nardis, and E. Ilievski, Squeezed ensem- bles and anomalous dynamic roughening in interacting integrable chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 130401 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum sim- ulation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 153 (2014)

    2014

  17. [25]

    H¨ ubner, L

    F. H¨ ubner, L. Biagetti, J. De Nardis, and B. Doyon, Dif- fusive hydrodynamics from long-range correlations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 187101 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    M. K. Joshi, F. Kranzl, A. Schuckert, I. Lovas, C. Maier, R. Blatt, M. Knap, and C. F. Roos, Observing emergent hydrodynamics in a long-range quantum magnet, Science 376, 720 (2022)

    2022

  19. [27]

    Pr¨ ahofer and H

    M. Pr¨ ahofer and H. Spohn, Universal distributions for growth processes in 1 + 1 dimensions and random matri- ces, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4882 (2000)

    2000

  20. [28]

    Doyon, G

    B. Doyon, G. Perfetto, T. Sasamoto, and T. Yoshimura, Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory, SciPost Phys. 15, 136 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Myers, M

    J. Myers, M. J. Bhaseen, R. J. Harris, and B. Doyon, Transport fluctuations in integrable models out of equi- librium, SciPost Phys. 8, 007 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    Krajnik, J

    ˇZ. Krajnik, J. Schmidt, E. Ilievski, and T. Prosen, Dy- namical criticality of magnetization transfer in integrable spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 017101 (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    J. F. Wienand, S. Karch, A. Impertro, C. Schweizer, E. McCulloch, R. Vasseur, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Aidels- burger, and I. Bloch, Emergence of fluctuating hydrody- namics in chaotic quantum systems, Nat. Phys. 20, 1732 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    D. Wei, A. Rubio-Abadal, B. Ye, F. Machado, J. Kemp, K. Srakaew, S. Hollerith, J. Rui, S. Gopalakrishnan, N. Y. Yao, I. Bloch, and J. Zeiher, Quantum gas mi- croscopy of kardar-parisi-zhang superdiffusion, Science 376, 716 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    P. N. Jepsen, J. Amato-Grill, I. Dimitrova, W. W. Ho, E. Demler, and W. Ketterle, Spin transport in a tunable heisenberg model realized with ultracold atoms, Nature 588, 403 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    P. N. Jepsen, W. W. Ho, J. Amato-Grill, I. Dimitrova, E. Demler, and W. Ketterle, Transverse spin dynamics in the anisotropic heisenberg model realized with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. X 11, 041054 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    P. N. Jepsen, Y. K. E. Lee, H. Lin, I. Dimitrova, Y. Mar- galit, W. W. Ho, and W. Ketterle, Long-lived phantom helix states in heisenberg quantum magnets, Nat. Phys. 18, 899 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Rosenberg, T

    E. Rosenberg, T. Andersen, R. Samajdar, A. Petukhov, J. Hoke, D. Abanin, A. Bengtsson, I. Drozdov, C. Er- ickson, P. Klimov, et al., Dynamics of magnetization at infinite temperature in a heisenberg spin chain, Science 384, 48 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    K. A. Takeuchi, K. Takasan, O. Busani, P. L. Ferrari, R. Vasseur, and J. De Nardis, Partial yet definite emer- gence of the kardar-parisi-zhang class in isotropic spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 097104 (2025)

    2025

  30. [39]

    De Nardis, S

    J. De Nardis, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Non- linear fluctuating hydrodynamics for kardar-parisi-zhang scaling in isotropic spin chains, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 197102 (2023)

    2023

  31. [40]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Level-spacing distributions and the airy kernel, Commun. Math. Phys. 159, 151 (1994)

    1994

  32. [41]

    McCulloch, J

    E. McCulloch, J. De Nardis, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Full counting statistics of charge in chaotic many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 210402 (2023)

    2023

  33. [42]

    Bertini, P

    B. Bertini, P. Calabrese, M. Collura, K. Klobas, and C. Rylands, Nonequilibrium full counting statistics and symmetry-resolved entanglement from space-time dual- ity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 140401 (2023)

    2023

  34. [43]

    Samajdar, E

    R. Samajdar, E. McCulloch, V. Khemani, R. Vasseur, and S. Gopalakrishnan, Quantum turnstiles for robust measurement of full counting statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 240403 (2024)

    2024

  35. [44]

    Krajnik, J

    ˇZ. Krajnik, J. Schmidt, V. Pasquier, E. Ilievski, and T. Prosen, Exact anomalous current fluctuations in a deterministic interacting model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 160601 (2022)

    2022

  36. [45]

    Krajnik, E

    ˇZ. Krajnik, E. Ilievski, and T. Prosen, Absence of normal fluctuations in an integrable magnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 090604 (2022)

    2022

  37. [46]

    Ljubotina, M

    M. Ljubotina, M. ˇZnidariˇ c, and T. Prosen, Spin diffusion from an inhomogeneous quench in an integrable system, Nat. Commun. 8, 16117 (2017)

    2017

  38. [47]

    Misguich, K

    G. Misguich, K. Mallick, and P. L. Krapivsky, Dynamics of the spin-1 2 heisenberg chain initialized in a domain-wall state, Phys. Rev. B 96, 195151 (2017)

    2017

  39. [48]

    Ljubotina, M

    M. Ljubotina, M. ˇZnidariˇ c, and T. Prosen, A class of states supporting diffusive spin dynamics in the isotropic heisenberg model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theo. 50, 475002 (2017). 7

    2017

  40. [49]

    Misguich, N

    G. Misguich, N. Pavloff, and V. Pasquier, Domain wall problem in the quantum xxz chain and semiclassical be- havior close to the isotropic point, SciPost Physics 7, 025 (2019)

    2019

  41. [50]

    Gamayun, Y

    O. Gamayun, Y. Miao, and E. Ilievski, Domain wall dy- namics in the landau–lifshitz magnet and the classical- quantum correspondence for spin transport, Phys. Rev. B 99, 140301 (2019)

    2019

  42. [51]

    S. Hild, T. Fukuhara, P. Schauß, J. Zeiher, M. Knap, E. Demler, I. Bloch, and C. Gross, Far-from-equilibrium spin transport in heisenberg quantum magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 147205 (2014)

    2014

  43. [52]

    See Supplemental Material at [url:XXXX] for full count- ing statistics, initial states, convergence tests for finite- size effects and bond dimensions, additonal data of spin polarization transfer and contrast cumulants, and dy- namical scaling from subsystem quantum fluctuations

  44. [53]

    P. J. Smith, A recursive formulation of the old problem of obtaining moments from cumulants and vice versa, Am. Stat. 49, 217 (1995)

    1995

  45. [54]

    Holtermann, J

    A. Holtermann, J. Noronha-Hostler, A. M. Sickles, and X. Wang, Multiparticle correlations, cumulants, and mo- ments sensitive to fluctuations in rare-probe azimuthal anisotropy in heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 108, 064901 (2023)

    2023

  46. [55]

    Royer, Cumulant expansions and pressure broadening as an example of relaxation, Phys

    A. Royer, Cumulant expansions and pressure broadening as an example of relaxation, Phys. Rev. A 6, 1741 (1972)

    1972

  47. [56]

    Parrinello and T

    M. Parrinello and T. Arai, Infinite-order cumulant ex- pansion for spins, Phys. Rev. B 10, 265 (1974)

    1974

  48. [57]

    Hirayama, F

    R. Hirayama, F. Grassi, W. M. Serenone, and J.-Y. Olli- trault, Cumulants of conserved charges in hydrodynamic simulations, Phys. Rev. C 107, 024910 (2023)

    2023

  49. [58]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions, SciPost Phys. Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  50. [59]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 070601 (2011)

    2011

  51. [60]

    Goto and I

    S. Goto and I. Danshita, Performance of the time- dependent variational principle for matrix product states in the long-time evolution of a pure state, Phys. Rev. B 99, 054307 (2019)

    2019

  52. [61]

    Gleis, J.-W

    A. Gleis, J.-W. Li, and J. von Delft, Controlled bond ex- pansion for density matrix renormalization group ground state search at single-site costs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246402 (2023)

    2023

  53. [62]

    Yang and S

    M. Yang and S. R. White, Time-dependent variational principle with ancillary krylov subspace, Phys. Rev. B 102, 094315 (2020)

    2020

  54. [63]

    Popkov, X

    V. Popkov, X. Zhang, F. G¨ ohmann, and A. Kl¨ umper, Chiral basis for qubits and spin-helix decay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 220404 (2024)

    2024

  55. [64]

    Popkov, X

    V. Popkov, X. Zhang, and A. Kl¨ umper, Phantom bethe excitations and spin helix eigenstates in integrable peri- odic and open spin chains, Phys. Rev. B 104, L081410 (2021)

    2021

  56. [65]

    Pereira and E

    D. Pereira and E. J. Mueller, Dynamics of spin helices in the one-dimensional xx model, Phys. Rev. A 106, 043306 (2022)

    2022

  57. [66]

    Pereira and E

    D. Pereira and E. J. Mueller, Dynamics of spin helices in the diluted one-dimensional xx model, Phys. Rev. A 110, 023313 (2024)

    2024

  58. [67]

    Popkov, M

    V. Popkov, M. ˇZnidariˇ c, and X. Zhang, Universality in the relaxation of spin helices under XXZ spin-chain dy- namics, Phys. Rev. B 107, 235408 (2023)

    2023

  59. [68]

    Cecile, S

    G. Cecile, S. Gopalakrishnan, R. Vasseur, and J. De Nardis, Hydrodynamic relaxation of spin helices, Phys. Rev. B 108, 075135 (2023)

    2023

  60. [69]

    Zhang, A

    X. Zhang, A. Kl¨ umper, and V. Popkov, Phantom bethe roots in the integrable open spin- 1 2 xxz chain, Phys. Rev. B 103, 115435 (2021)

    2021

  61. [70]

    Zhang, A

    X. Zhang, A. Kl¨ umper, and V. Popkov, Chiral coordinate bethe ansatz for phantom eigenstates in the open xxz spin− 1 2 chain, Phys. Rev. B 104, 195409 (2021)

    2021

  62. [71]

    K¨ uhn, F

    S. K¨ uhn, F. Gerken, L. Funcke, T. Hartung, P. Stornati, K. Jansen, and T. Posske, Quantum spin helices more stable than the ground state: Onset of helical protection, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214422 (2023)

    2023

  63. [72]

    Baik and E

    J. Baik and E. M. Rains, Limiting distributions for a polynuclear growth model with external sources, Journal of Statistical Physics 100, 523 (2000)

    2000

  64. [73]

    Gopalakrishnan, A

    S. Gopalakrishnan, A. Morningstar, R. Vasseur, and V. Khemani, Distinct universality classes of diffusive transport from full counting statistics, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024417 (2024)

    2024

  65. [74]

    Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    T. Giamarchi, Quantum Physics in One Dimension(Ox- ford University Press, 2003)

    2003

  66. [75]

    Senaratne, D

    R. Senaratne, D. Cavazos-Cavazos, S. Wang, F. He, Y.-T. Chang, A. Kafle, H. Pu, X.-W. Guan, and R. G. Hulet, Spin-charge separation in a one-dimensional fermi gas with tunable interactions, Science 376, 1305 (2022)

    2022

  67. [76]

    C. G. West, A. Garcia-Saez, and T.-C. Wei, Efficient eval- uation of high-order moments and cumulants in tensor network states, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115103 (2015)

    2015

  68. [77]

    J. Wang, R. Mishra, T.-H. Yang, L. V. Delacr´ etaz, and S. Pappalardi, Eigenstate thermalization hy- pothesis correlations via non-linear hydrodynamics, arXiv:2409.14442 (2025). 8 Supplemental Material: Universal scaling of higher-order cumulants in quantum isotropic spin chai...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.