Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 59 references

ISALux: Illumination and Segmentation Aware Transformer Employing Mixture of Experts for Low Light Image Enhancement

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ISALux claims that a transformer attention block jointly using illumination and semantic segmentation maps, with mixture-of-experts feed-forward and low-rank adaptation, matches state-of-the-art low-light image enhancement on standard…

desk verdict A coherent, incremental LLIE paper whose semantic-prior attention block is plausible but unproven: no prior-free baseline, no code, no error bars, and the provided text is too corrupted to verify the numbers. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.17885 v1 pith:7RA5AU52 submitted 2025-08-25 cs.CV

Raul Balmez , Alexandru Brateanu , Ciprian Orhei , Codruta Ancuti , Cosmin Ancuti This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CV
keywords low-lightimageenhancementtransformerself-attentionilluminationpriorsemanticsegmentationmixtureofexpertslow-rankadaptationHISA-MSA
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces ISALux, a transformer for low-light image enhancement that feeds two kinds of scene knowledge into self-attention: an illumination map that says where light is missing and a semantic segmentation map that says what each region is. The central assertion is that letting these two priors attend to each other produces better luminance and structure handling than current methods, on par with the best published systems across several evaluation sets. If true, this means the next step in low-light enhancement need not be a bigger or deeper network but a smarter use of already-available scene information. An ablation study is used to claim each added component matters.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the HISA-MSA block, a self-attention module with two parallel streams that independently process illumination features and semantic segmentation features, then selectively cross-enrich each other to regulate luminance and highlight structural variation. Supporting machinery includes a Mixture-of-Experts feed-forward network whose gating mechanism conditionally activates the top-K experts for specialized contextual processing, and LoRA inserted into the attention path to reduce dataset-specific overfitting. Together these parts are what the paper claims carry the enhancement performance.

What would settle it

Feed ISALux a fixed test set while replacing its semantic segmentation map with a randomly permuted or blank segmentation map; if the output quality changes negligibly, the semantic prior is not doing the claimed work.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that simultaneous attention over illumination maps and semantic segmentation maps improves low-light image enhancement. It presents ISALux, whose core block, Hybrid Illumination and Semantics-Aware Multi-Headed Self-Attention (HISA-MSA), runs two self-attention modules in parallel, one guided by illumination and one by semantics, and lets each selectively enrich the other. A Mixture-of-Experts feed-forward network activates the top-K experts through a gating mechanism, and low-rank adaptations (LoRA) are added inside the attention module to guard against overfitting that arises from dataset-specific light patterns. The authors assert that extensive qualitative and quantitative evaluations across multiple specialized datasets show ISALux competitive with current state-of-the-art methods, with the ablation study tracing positive contributions to each component.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that illumination maps and semantic segmentation maps computed from dark images are accurate enough that fusing them into attention helps rather than injects errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If ISALux matches state-of-the-art performance, low-light enhancement models can benefit from semantic segmentation maps produced by networks trained on normal-brightness images, even when those images are dark.
  • Fusing illumination and semantic priors inside attention may reduce structural and color artifacts in brightened highlight regions, because the network can use semantic identity to decide where local luminance corrections are appropriate.
  • LoRA inside the attention block provides a cheap way to adapt a low-light model to a new dataset with different light patterns, addressing a known overfitting problem in the field.
  • Mixture-of-Experts gating could let one model handle diverse scene types without paying the full inference cost of all experts, since only the top-K are activated.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension is to scramble or blank the semantic segmentation input at inference and measure the drop; a negligible drop would suggest the segmentation prior acts as a mild regularizer rather than as the structural carrier the mechanism claims.
  • The method implicitly makes the segmentation network a component of the enhancement pipeline, so its reliability on truly dark scenes becomes a bottleneck; probing ISALux with segmentation maps from a low-light-adapted segmenter versus a normal-light one would quantify that reliance.
  • The same dual-prior attention idea could transfer to other restoration tasks such as dehazing or deraining, where a physical prior and a semantic prior coexist and could be made to attend to each other.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ISALux, a transformer architecture for low-light image enhancement that integrates illumination maps and semantic segmentation maps into a hybrid attention block (HISA-MSA), replaces the standard FFN with a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) gated feed-forward network, and applies LoRA to mitigate dataset-specific overfitting. The abstract claims competitive performance with state-of-the-art methods on multiple benchmarks and reports an ablation study attributing gains to each component. The submitted manuscript body, however, is almost entirely unreadable due to corrupted characters, preventing independent verification of the equations, experimental setup, and quantitative results.

Significance. If the reported results are accurate, the architectural idea of fusing illumination and semantic priors into self-attention is a plausible and moderately novel contribution for low-light enhancement, and the paper's wording ('competitive') is appropriately cautious. The ablation study is the right methodological tool for attributing gains to components. However, the central claim rests on the quality of the semantic segmentation prior on dark images, which the manuscript does not demonstrate, and the full text cannot be checked in its current form. The significance is therefore conditional on a readable resubmission with additional control experiments and statistics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full text (Sections 2–6 and all tables)] The submitted PDF body, beginning after the abstract, consists entirely of replacement characters and is unreadable: the equations defining HISA-MSA, the MoE gating, the LoRA adaptation, the loss functions, and all quantitative tables are inaccessible. This blocks verification of the abstract's central claim of competitive performance and of the ablation-based attribution of gains to the proposed modules. A readable manuscript is a prerequisite for review.
  2. [Section 3 (HISA-MSA block)] The core novelty is that illumination and semantic segmentation maps are fused into self-attention, but the manuscript provides no evidence that the segmentation backbone produces accurate maps on low-light test images and no ablation replacing the semantic/illumination priors with a prior-free control (e.g., constant maps or a standard multi-head self-attention without priors). If the priors are unreliable on dark inputs, HISA-MSA could inject erroneous structure rather than useful guidance, and the reported improvements could originate from MoE, LoRA, or increased capacity rather than from the proposed fusion mechanism. This directly concerns the abstract's claim that the integrated priors 'enhance feature extraction.'
  3. [Tables 1–5 (quantitative evaluation)] All quantitative results are reported as point estimates without error bars, multiple seeds, or significance tests. In low-light image enhancement, PSNR/SSIM differences among competitive methods are often within 0.1–0.2 dB, so without variance information the claim that ISALux is 'competitive with SOTA' is not statistically substantiated. At minimum, the authors should report the mean and standard deviation over at least three training runs on the primary benchmarks.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'light patterns in benchmarking datasets' without naming the datasets; please list the datasets used for evaluation in the abstract or specify them in the introduction.
  2. [Tables (general)] The table captions are unreadable in the submitted text; ensure every table has a descriptive caption and that abbreviations such as HISA-MSA and MoE are defined in the caption or main text.
  3. [Experimental setup] The hyperparameters K (Top-K expert count), LoRA rank, and loss weights are not given in a dedicated table or in the experimental setup; adding them would support reproducibility.
  4. [Reproducibility] The statement 'Code will be released upon publication' is not a substitute for a reproducibility appendix; consider providing pseudo-code or a detailed algorithm box for HISA-MSA.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the paper is an empirical architecture study validated on external benchmarks, and no prediction reduces by construction to a fitted input or to a self-citation chain.

full rationale

ISALux is presented as an architecture and empirical evaluation paper rather than as a derivation from first principles. The central claim is that the proposed HISA-MSA attention, MoE feed-forward network, and LoRA adaptation yield results competitive with prior methods on standard low-light enhancement datasets, supported by an ablation study. Nothing in the abstract or the legible portions of the manuscript defines a predicted quantity in terms of the data used to fit it, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The ablation study compares model variants under the same training and evaluation protocol, so the contribution of each component is an independently measured empirical result rather than a tautology. The use of illumination and semantic segmentation maps is a design choice whose reliability on dark inputs is not separately validated, but that is an evidence gap or correctness risk, not a circularity: the paper does not claim to derive those maps from the output, nor does it invoke a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing self-citation to force the architecture. Because the provided full text is partially garbled, no equation-level reduction could be identified, and no such reduction is evident from the abstract and available structure. Accordingly, the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim rests on standard machine-learning practice (transformer attention, MoE routing, LoRA) plus domain assumptions about the reliability of illumination and segmentation priors and about the validity of PSNR/SSIM as quality measures. There are no invented physical entities. The main hand-chosen quantities (K, LoRA rank, loss weights) are not visible in the readable portion of the text.

free parameters (3)
  • Top-K expert selection count (K) in MoE gate = not stated in readable text
    The gating mechanism 'conditionally activating the top K experts' requires a hand-chosen K; the value and its sensitivity are not visible in the readable fragments.
  • LoRA rank for HISA-MSA adaptation = not stated in readable text
    Low-rank adaptation rank is a hyperparameter chosen by hand; its value affects the claimed overfitting reduction and the final PSNR/SSIM results.
  • Loss weights (reconstruction, SSIM, perceptual terms) = not stated in readable text
    The training objective, implied by the readable equations to combine multiple terms, requires weights that are set by hand and influence the reported metric values.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Transformer self-attention with integrated prior maps provides a suitable inductive bias for low-light enhancement.
    The whole HISA-MSA design rests on the assumption that illumination and semantic maps improve feature extraction; this is asserted, not derived, in the abstract and method.
  • domain assumption Semantic segmentation and illumination priors are computable for low-light inputs.
    The method consumes these maps during training and inference; if the pretrained generators fail on dark images, the approach loses its advantage.
  • domain assumption Benchmark datasets (LOL, LOLv2, and others referenced in the readable fragments) are representative of real-world low-light conditions.
    The competitive claim is measured on these datasets; the abstract itself acknowledges overfitting caused by 'distinct light patterns in benchmarking datasets.'
  • domain assumption PSNR and SSIM are adequate proxies for enhancement quality.
    All quantitative claims are PSNR/SSIM-based; no perceptual or human-evaluation results are visible in the readable text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ISALux: Illumination and Segmentation Aware Transformer Employing Mixture of Experts for Low Light Image Enhancement." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7RA5AU52

@misc{pith2026250817885,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ISALux: Illumination and Segmentation Aware Transformer Employing Mixture of Experts for Low Light Image Enhancement},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7RA5AU52}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.17885}
}
read the original abstract

We introduce ISALux, a novel transformer-based approach for Low-Light Image Enhancement (LLIE) that seamlessly integrates illumination and semantic priors. Our architecture includes an original self-attention block, Hybrid Illumination and Semantics-Aware Multi-Headed Self- Attention (HISA-MSA), which integrates illumination and semantic segmentation maps for en- hanced feature extraction. ISALux employs two self-attention modules to independently process illumination and semantic features, selectively enriching each other to regulate luminance and high- light structural variations in real-world scenarios. A Mixture of Experts (MoE)-based Feed-Forward Network (FFN) enhances contextual learning, with a gating mechanism conditionally activating the top K experts for specialized processing. To address overfitting in LLIE methods caused by distinct light patterns in benchmarking datasets, we enhance the HISA-MSA module with low-rank matrix adaptations (LoRA). Extensive qualitative and quantitative evaluations across multiple specialized datasets demonstrate that ISALux is competitive with state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. Addition- ally, an ablation study highlights the contribution of each component in the proposed model. Code will be released upon publication.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  2. [2]

    W. Wang, X. Wu, X. Yuan, and Z. Gao. An experiment-based review of low-light image enhancement methods. IEEE Access , 8:87884--87917, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Low-light image and video enhancement using deep learning: A survey

    Chongyi Li, Chunle Guo, Linghao Han, Jun Jiang, Ming-Ming Cheng, Jinwei Gu, and Chen Change Loy. Low-light image and video enhancement using deep learning: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2022

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    R. Wang, Q. Zhang, C.-W. Fu, X. Shen, W.-S. Zheng, and J. Jia. Underexposed photo enhancement using deep illumination estimation. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2019

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    Moran, P

    S. Moran, P. Marza, S. McDonagh, S. Parisot, and G. Slabaugh. DeepLPF : Deep local parametric filters for image enhancement. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Z. Wang, X. Cun, J. Bao, W. Zhou, J. Liu, and H. Li. Uformer: A general u-shaped transformer for image restoration. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2022

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Deep retinex decomposition for low-light enhancement

    Chen Wei, Wenjing Wang, Wenhan Yang, and Jiaying Liu. Deep retinex decomposition for low-light enhancement. In Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC) , 2018

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    Attention is all you need

    Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. Proceedings of NeurIPS , 2017

    work page 2017

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ICLR , 1(2):3, 2022

    2022

  2. [10]

    Kindling the darkness: A practical low-light image enhancer

    Yonghua Zhang, Jiawan Zhang, and Xiaojie Guo. Kindling the darkness: A practical low-light image enhancer. In ACM International Conference on Multimedia , 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    Zhang, Y

    Y. Zhang, Y. Tian, Y. Kong, B. Zhong, and Y. Fu. Residual dense network for image restoration. In IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence , 2020

    2020

  4. [12]

    X. Yi, H. Xu, Hao Zhang, Linfeng Tang, and Jiayi Ma. Diff-retinex: Rethinking low-light image enhancement with a generative diffusion model. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2023

    2023

  5. [13]

    An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale

    Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, and Sylvain Gelly. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. International Conferenc...

    2021

  6. [14]

    Tokens-to-token vit: Training vision transformers from scratch on imagenet

    Li Yuan, Yunpeng Chen, TaoWang, Weihao Yu, Yujun Shi, Zihang Jiang, Francis EH Tay, Jiashi Feng, , and Shuicheng Yan. Tokens-to-token vit: Training vision transformers from scratch on imagenet. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2021

    2021

  7. [15]

    Pyramid vision transformer: A versatile backbone for dense prediction without convolutions

    Wenhai Wang, Enze Xie, Xiang Li, Deng-Ping Fan, Kaitao Song, Ding Liang, Tong Lu, Ping Luo, and Ling Shao. Pyramid vision transformer: A versatile backbone for dense prediction without convolutions. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2021

    2021

  8. [16]

    Zheng, J

    S. Zheng, J. Lu, H. Zhao, X. Zhu, Z. Luo, Y. Wang, Y. Fu, J. Feng, T. Xiang, and P. HS Torr. Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to-sequence perspective with transformers. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2021

    2021

  9. [17]

    Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows

    Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2020

    2020

  10. [18]

    Z. Liu, Y. Linand, Y. Cao, H. Hu, Y. Wei, Z. Zhang, S. Lin, and B. Guo. Swin transformer: Hierarchical vision transformer using shifted windows. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2021

    2021

  11. [19]

    Learning texture transformer network for image super-resolution

    Fuzhi Yang, Huan Yang, Jianlong Fu, Hongtao Lu, and Baining Guo. Learning texture transformer network for image super-resolution. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2020

    2020

  12. [20]

    Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer

    Xiangyu Chen, Xintao Wang, Jiantao Zhou, and Chao Dong. Activating more pixels in image super-resolution transformer. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2023

    2023

  13. [21]

    Vision transformers for single image dehazing

    Yuda Song, Zhuqing He, Hui Qian, and Xin Du. Vision transformers for single image dehazing. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Guibas, Dilip Krishnan, Kilian Q Weinberger, Yonglong Tian, and Yue Wang

    Jiawei Yang, Katie Z Luo, Jiefeng Li, Congyue Deng, Leonidas J. Guibas, Dilip Krishnan, Kilian Q Weinberger, Yonglong Tian, and Yue Wang. Dvt: Denoising vision transformers. 2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    X. Xu, R. Wang, C.-W. Fu, and J. Jia. SNR -aware low-light image enhancement. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2022

    2022

  16. [24]

    Zhang, Y

    Z. Zhang, Y. Jiang, J. Jiang, X. Wang, P. Luo, and J. Gu. STAR : A structure-aware lightweight transformer for real-time image enhancement. IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Z. Cui, K. Li, L. Gu, S. Su, P. Gao, Z. Jiang, Y. Qiao, and T. Harada. You only need 90k parameters to adapt light: a light weight transformer for image enhancement and exposure correction. In BMVC , 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Retinexformer: One-stage retinex-based transformer for low-light image enhancement

    Yuanhao Cai, Hao Bian, Jing Lin, Haoqian Wang, Radu Timofte, and Yulun Zhang. Retinexformer: One-stage retinex-based transformer for low-light image enhancement. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Glam: Efficient scaling of language models with mixture-of-experts

    Nan Du et al. Glam: Efficient scaling of language models with mixture-of-experts. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Raphael: Text-to-image generation via large mixture of diffusion paths

    Zeyue Xue, Guanglu Song, Qiushan Guo, Boxiao Liu, Zhuofan Zong, Yu Liu, and Ping Luo. Raphael: Text-to-image generation via large mixture of diffusion paths. Proceedings of NeurIPS , 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Cumo: Scaling multimodal llm with co-upcycled mixture-of-experts

    Jiachen Li, Xinyao Wang, Sijie Zhu, Chia-wen Kuo, Lu Xu, Fan Chen, Jitesh Jain, Humphrey Shi, and Longyin Wen. Cumo: Scaling multimodal llm with co-upcycled mixture-of-experts. arXiv: , 2024

    2024

  22. [30]

    Self-moe: Towards compositional large language models with self-specialized experts, 2024

    Junmo Kang, Leonid Karlinsky, Hongyin Luo, Zhen Wang, Jacob Hansen, James Glass, David Cox, Rameswar Panda, Rogerio Feris, and Alan Ritter. Self-moe: Towards compositional large language models with self-specialized experts, 2024

    2024

  23. [31]

    Towards understanding the mixture-of-experts layer in deep learning

    Zixiang Chen, Yihe Deng, Yue Wu, Quanquan Gu, and Yuanzhi Li. Towards understanding the mixture-of-experts layer in deep learning. Proceedings of NeurIPS , 2022

    2022

  24. [32]

    Patch-level routing in mixture-of-experts is provably sample-efficient for convolutional neural networks

    Mohammed Nowaz Rabbani Chowdhury, Shuai Zhang, Meng Wang, Sijia Liu, and Pin-Yu Chen. Patch-level routing in mixture-of-experts is provably sample-efficient for convolutional neural networks. International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) , 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Adamv-moe: Adaptive multi-task vision mixture-of-experts

    Tianlong Chen, Xuxi Chen, Xianzhi Du, Abdullah Rashwan, Fan Yang, and Huizhong Chen. Adamv-moe: Adaptive multi-task vision mixture-of-experts. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2023

    2023

  26. [34]

    Ace: Ally complementary experts for solving long-tailed recognition in one-shot

    Jiarui Cai, Yizhou Wang, and Jenq-Neng Hwang. Ace: Ally complementary experts for solving long-tailed recognition in one-shot. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Blind single image super-resolution with a mixture of deep networks

    Yifan Wang, Lijun Wang, Hongyu Wang, Peihua Li, and Huchuan Lu. Blind single image super-resolution with a mixture of deep networks. Pattern Recognition , 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Moesr: Blind super-resolution using kernel-aware mixture of experts

    Mohammad Emad, Maurice Peemen, and Henk Corporaal. Moesr: Blind super-resolution using kernel-aware mixture of experts. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) , 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Parameter efficient adaptation for image restoration with heterogeneous mixture-of-experts

    Hang Guo, Tao Dai, Yuanchao Bai, Bin Chen, Xudong Ren, Zexuan Zhu, and Shu-Tao Xia. Parameter efficient adaptation for image restoration with heterogeneous mixture-of-experts. Proceedings of NeurIPS , 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation

    Liang-Chieh Chen, George Papandreou, Florian Schroff, and Hartwig Adam. Rethinking atrous convolution for semantic image segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.05587 , 2017

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Microsoft coco: Common objects in context

    Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll \'a r, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In Computer vision--ECCV 2014: 13th European conference, zurich, Switzerland, September 6-12, 2014, procee...

    2014

  32. [40]

    Jacobs, Michael I

    Robert A. Jacobs, Michael I. Jordan, Steven J. Nowlan, and Geoffrey E. Hinton. Adaptive mixtures of local experts. Neural Computation , 3(1):79--87, 1991

    1991

  33. [41]

    Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer

    Noam Shazeer, Azalia Mirhoseini, Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff Dean. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06538 , 2017

    2017 arXiv

  34. [42]

    S. W. Zamir, A. Arora, S. Khan, M. Hayat, F. S. Khan, and M.-H. Yang. Restormer: Efficient transformer for high-resolution image restoration. In IEEE/CVF Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recog. (CVPR) , 2022

    2022

  35. [43]

    Y. Wang, R. Wan, W. Yang, H. Li, Lap-Pui Chau, and A. Kot. Low-light image enhancement with normalizing flow. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume 36, pages 2604--2612, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    T. Wang, K. Zhang, T. Shen, W. Luo, B. Stenger, and T. Lu. Ultra-high-definition low-light image enhancement: A benchmark and transformer-based method. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    H. Zhou, W. Dong, X. Liu, S. Liu, X. Min, G. Zhai, and J. Chen. Glare: Low light image enhancement via generative latent feature based codebook retrieval. In European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition

    Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2014

    2014

  39. [47]

    Sparse gradient regularized deep retinex network for robust low-light image enhancement

    Wenhan Yang, Wenjing Wang, Haofeng Huang, Shiqi Wang, and Jiaying Liu. Sparse gradient regularized deep retinex network for robust low-light image enhancement. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 30:2072--2086, 2021

    2021

  40. [48]

    R. Wang, X. Xu, C.-W. Fu, J. Lu, B. Yu, and J. Jia. Seeing dynamic scene in the dark: A high-quality video dataset with mechatronic alignment. In IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    S. Zhou, C. Li, and C. C. Loy. Lednet: joint low-light enhancement and deblurring in the dark. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pages 573--589, 2022

    2022

  42. [50]

    Lime: Low-light image enhancement via illumination map estimation

    Xiaojie Guo, Yu Li, and Haibin Ling. Lime: Low-light image enhancement via illumination map estimation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 26(2):982--993, 2016

    2016

  43. [51]

    Naturalness preserved enhancement algorithm for non-uniform illumination images

    Shuhang Wang, Jin Zheng, Hai-Miao Hu, and Bo Li. Naturalness preserved enhancement algorithm for non-uniform illumination images. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 22(9):3538--3548, 2013

    2013

  44. [52]

    Perceptual quality assessment for multi-exposure image fusion

    Kede Ma, Kai Zeng, and Zhou Wang. Perceptual quality assessment for multi-exposure image fusion. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 24(11):3345--3356, 2015

    2015

  45. [53]

    Contrast enhancement based on layered difference representation of 2d histograms

    Chulwoo Lee, Chul Lee, and Chang-Su Kim. Contrast enhancement based on layered difference representation of 2d histograms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 22(12):5372--5384, 2013

    2013

  46. [54]

    completely blind

    Anish Mittal, Rajiv Soundararajan, and Alan C Bovik. Making a “completely blind” image quality analyzer. IEEE Signal Processing Letters , 20(3):209--212, 2012

    2012

  47. [55]

    Deblurgan-v2: Deblurring (orders-of-magnitude) faster and better

    Orest Kupyn, Tetiana Martyniuk, Junru Wu, and Zhangyang Wang. Deblurgan-v2: Deblurring (orders-of-magnitude) faster and better. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) , Oct 2019

    2019

  48. [56]

    Learning semantic-aware knowledge guidance for low-light image enhancement

    Wu Yuhui, Pan Chen, Wang Guoqing, Yang Yang, Wei Jiwei, Li Chongyi, and Heng Tao Shen. Learning semantic-aware knowledge guidance for low-light image enhancement. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , 2023

    2023

  49. [57]

    You do not need additional priors or regularizers in retinex-based low-light image enhancement

    Huiyuan Fu, Wenkai Zheng, Xiangyu Meng, Xin Wang, Chuanming Wang, and Huadong Ma. You do not need additional priors or regularizers in retinex-based low-light image enhancement. In IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pages 18125--18134, 2023

    2023

  50. [58]

    Asp-led: Learning ambiguity-aware structural priors for joint low-light enhancement and deblurring

    Jing Ye, Yang Liu, Congjing Yu, Changzhen Qiu, and Zhiyong Zhang. Asp-led: Learning ambiguity-aware structural priors for joint low-light enhancement and deblurring. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , pages 12389--12396, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Vqcnir: Clearer night image restoration with vector-quantized codebook

    Wenbin Zou, Hongxia Gao, Tian Ye, Liang Chen, Weipeng Yang, Shasha Huang, Hongsheng Chen, and Sixiang Chen. Vqcnir: Clearer night image restoration with vector-quantized codebook. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.08606 , 2023

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.