Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 58 references

3D microwave imaging of a van der Waals heterostructure

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that tuning a surface layer into an insulating gap opens a 'microwave window' that lets a scanning microwave microscope directly image quantum states and disorder in a buried atomic layer, demonstrated on double-layer grap

desk verdict A useful layer-resolved MIM method, but the 'direct microwave window' claim lacks a control distinguishing bottom-layer response from top-layer electrostatic coupling. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18365 v1 pith:JKMPKZDQ submitted 2025-08-25 cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-el

Leonard W. Cao , Chen Wu , Lingyuan Lyu , Liam Cohen , Noah Samuelson , Ziying Yan , Sneh Pancholi , Kenji Watanabe
show 4 more authors
Takashi Taniguchi Daniel E. Parker Andrea F. Young Monica T. Allen
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.str-el PACS 73.43.-f07.79.-s
keywords microwaveimpedancemicroscopylayer-resolvedimagingvanderWaalsheterostructuresquantumHallstatesgraphenesubsurfaceelectroniccompressibilitydisorderscreening
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces layer-resolved microwave impedance microscopy (LR-MIM), a scanning-probe method that separates the microwave signal of a multilayer stack into per-plane contributions. In a double-layer graphene device in the quantum Hall regime, the authors tune the top layer's Fermi energy into an insulating gap, which makes the top layer transparent to 4.22 GHz microwaves and opens a 'window' through which the bottom layer can be imaged directly. Using this window, they read out bottom-layer quantum Hall states through the top layer, extract the bottom layer's chemical potential and a gap near 105 meV at filling ±2, resolve negative compressibility near quantum Hall ferromagnets, and map carrier-density disorder on both layers. The paper argues this turns MIM into a 3D imaging tool for van der Waals heterostructures, including dual-gated devices where a surface layer screens disorder.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 'microwave window': the electromagnetic transmission T[σT] through the top layer, which depends on the top layer's conductivity tensor. When the top layer is in a gapped quantum Hall state, its longitudinal conductivity drops and T approaches identity, letting microwaves reach the buried layer. Layer attribution is carried by the double-layer capacitor relations eVTG = µB(nB) − µT(nT) − e²nT/CM and eVBG = µB(nB) + e²(nB + nT)/CB, which convert the voltage map into per-layer densities and chemical potentials; the MIM response itself is modelled as a sum of top- and bottom-layer charge-susceptibility contributions weighted by electromagnetic Green's functions.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of the same double-layer stack in transport: measure the longitudinal resistance and the bottom-layer filling sequence while independently verifying the bottom-layer chemical potential with a separate local probe (e.g., a single-electron transistor or capacitive readout). If the MIM-extracted µB(nB) does not reproduce the transport-determined filling sequence and gap positions, or if varying CM and CB by 10% moves the claimed νB = ±2 gap out of agreement, the layer-resolved attribution fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the total MIM signal from a multilayer van der Waals stack is a sum of per-layer responses, and that tuning all layers but one into an incompressible (gapped) state removes their microwave screening, leaving a direct line of sight to the chosen subsurface layer. In the proof-of-concept double-layer graphene device, top-layer Landau-level gaps serve as the shutter: when the top layer sits at fillings like νT = 0 or ±2, its conductivity drops and microwaves pass through it and the hBN spacer to excite the bottom layer. The paper demonstrates direct dips at bottom-layer fillings νB = 0, ±1, ±2 through a gapped top layer; using the voltage–density relations of a double-

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the device's electrostatics are exactly those of an ideal two-capacitor model with fixed dielectric capacitances (CM = 72 nF/cm², CB = 95 nF/cm²), and that each measured MIM feature can be assigned to one of the two graphene layers using conductivities taken from a different sample with adjustable Landau-level broadening. If interlayer tunneling, strain, or gate screening changes the effective capacitances, or if the layer attribution is wrong

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A top-gated device no longer needs its gate removed: LR-MIM can image the active layer through the gate.
  • The top layer doubles as a tunable screen, so the effect of surface disorder on fragile fractional quantum Hall states can be measured on one sample by sweeping top-layer compressibility.
  • Extracted µB(nB) gives local thermodynamic quantities—gaps, inverse compressibility, negative compressibility regions—for a buried layer, without requiring transport contacts.
  • The two-layer disorder maps (standard deviations 0.0118 vs 0.0038 in 10^12 cm^-2 units) quantify how much a surface layer attenuates disorder at a sub-surface plane.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The technique should transfer to zero-field systems: the microwave window needs only a gapped incompressible top layer, so stacks with intrinsic band gaps (TMDs, quantum spin Hall insulators) should work without a magnetic field; the paper mentions this only as an outlook.
  • The intermediate-compressibility regime where fractional states appear suggests a design rule for fragile states: a partially conducting cap layer can screen surface disorder while remaining transparent enough for subsurface probing; this could be tested by engineering the cap's conductivity via gate voltage.
  • If the per-layer MIM decomposition is quantitatively correct, the same measurement could extract interlayer capacitance and screening lengths in arbitrary van der Waals stacks, not just double-layer graphene.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces layer-resolved microwave impedance microscopy (LR-MIM), a scanning-probe method intended to separate the microwave response of individual atomic planes inside a van der Waals heterostructure. The demonstration uses a double-layer graphene device at B = 8 T and T = 60 mK. The authors identify quantum Hall states in the top layer, use the top layer as a local sensor to extract the bottom-layer chemical potential µ_B(n_B), report a gap Δ ≈ 105 meV at ν_B = ±2 and negative compressibility near quantum Hall ferromagnet states, and produce two-dimensional maps of carrier-density disorder on both layers. They also report signatures of fractional quantum Hall states in the bottom layer and argue that the top-layer compressibility controls their visibility. The central claim is that tuning the top layer into an insulating gap opens a 'microwave window' through which the bottom layer can be directly imaged.

Significance. If the central claim holds, LR-MIM is a substantial advance: it would provide the first scanning-probe route to imaging electronic states of a subsurface two-dimensional layer in a dual-gated vdW heterostructure, with direct applications to moiré systems, multilayer graphene, and displacement-field-controlled phases. The paper has clear strengths: it uses the established double-layer capacitor model (Eq. 3, Ref. 41) rather than an ad hoc electrostatic ansatz; the full two-gate sweep is compared quantitatively with a finite-element simulation based on single-particle conductivities; the extracted gap is consistent with the graphene Landau-level scale; and the layer-resolved disorder maps, if correct, are a new observable. However, the central 'direct subsurface microscopy' claim rests on an attribution of signal contributions that is not uniquely established by the data as presented, and several quantitative claims lack an error budget.

major comments (4)
  1. [Direct Subsurface Microscopy (Sec. II, Fig. 4)] The central claim that tuning the top layer into a gap opens a 'microwave window' that directly images the bottom layer is not uniquely established by the data. The FEA model computes the total MIM signal from σ_T and σ_B, but the SI does not provide a decomposition of the total signal into MIM_T and MIM_B, nor a control run with σ_B held constant (or with MIM_B set to zero). Because Eq. (3) couples n_B to µ_T and hence to σ_T, bottom-layer incompressible states would produce features in the top-layer contribution even if microwaves never reach the bottom layer. The line cuts in Fig. 4(c-d) are described as being taken with the top layer in the ν_T=+2 incompressible state, i.e. along its trajectory in the VTG–VBG plane; this mitigates the concern because MIM_T should be suppressed there, but the manuscript does not show the simulated MIM_T and MIM_B separately along that trajectory. With
  2. [Eq. (3) and Fermi-energy extraction (Sec. II, Fig. 3(e-f))] The quantitative results—µ_B(n_B), the gap Δ ≈ 105 meV, and the negative compressibility—depend on the ideal double-layer capacitor model with fixed capacitances C_M = 72 nF/cm² and C_B = 95 nF/cm², and on a single-particle µ_T(n_T). No error budget is provided. Uncertainties in hBN thicknesses and dielectric constants, possible interlayer tunneling, or strain-induced capacitance changes would shift the extracted µ_B and the quoted gap. The consistency of Δ with the single-particle graphene Landau-level scale is encouraging but is not an independent check, because the extraction pipeline assumes the same voltage-carrier relation. Please provide an uncertainty estimate and, if possible, a cross-check of C_M and C_B from the gate-voltage trajectories (e.g., the slope of the ν_T lines in Fig. 3(a)).
  3. [SI Eq. (S1) and FEA conductivity input] The only quantum input to the FEA model is the Landau-level-broadened conductivity with broadening factors γ_N (SI Eq. S1), imported from transport data of a different device (Ref. 43). The chosen values of γ_N and the justification for transferring them to the present device are not stated. Since the simulated total MIM response is used to label features as top- or bottom-layer in origin, the sensitivity of the layer attribution and of the extracted gap to the choice of γ_N should be assessed.
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 4(e-f)] The claim that fractional fillings ν_B = ±1/3, ±2/3 appear only in an intermediate top-layer compressibility regime, and the associated statement that the FQHE is stabilized by top-layer screening, are based on visual identification of weak dips at gray dotted lines. No signal-to-noise ratio, statistical significance, or baseline comparison is provided, and the 'strength' metric in Fig. 4(f) is the amplitude at a small number of data points. Since this is presented as a key physical result of the paper, it needs a more quantitative analysis—for example, dip amplitude relative to the noise floor, or repeated scans over the same region.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Introduction] Typo: 'microwave-impedence' should be 'microwave impedance'.
  2. [Fig. 5(c-d)] The stated standard deviations '0.0118 × 10⁻¹² cm⁻²' and '0.0038 × 10⁻¹² cm⁻²' appear to have an exponent error; typical density fluctuations in graphene are of order 10¹⁰ cm⁻². Please check and correct the units.
  3. [SI Eq. (S2)] The notation G_{rt,r} and G_{r,rt} is not defined explicitly; please clarify the Green's function arguments. Also, the proportionality in Eq. (1) to χ with the e^{−2|q|d} factor is stated but not derived in the main text; a brief derivation or a more explicit reference to Ref. 37 would help.
  4. [Fig. 3(e)] The 'gray dashed line' for theory is not labeled in the figure; please specify what theory is shown (e.g., single-particle graphene LL model with the same disorder broadening).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the extraction pipeline uses an external capacitor model and external transport data, and the key quantities (gap, negative compressibility) are outputs rather than fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained and does not reduce to its own inputs. The double-layer electrostatics of Eq. (3) is taken from the external Ref. [41] (Kim et al.) and is a standard capacitor model, not a relation fitted to this device's MIM data. The Fermi-energy extraction tracks top-layer Landau-level trajectories in the (VTG, VBG) plane and solves Eq. (3) for µB(nB); neither µB, the ~105 meV gap, nor the negative compressibility is a fitted parameter used to generate the same data—they are outputs compared with single-particle theory and prior experiments. The MIM forward model (Eqs. (2), (S2)) is validated by a COMSOL simulation whose only quantum inputs are conductivities derived from the external transport data of Ref. [43]; the agreement in Fig. 3(a)-(b) is an independent model comparison, not a circular reproduction. The 'microwave window' claim follows from the physical condition T[σT]→Id for a gapped top layer and is not defined in terms of the observed νB features. Self-citations [36,37] are technical or methodological (instrumentation and the standard linear-response formula) and are not load-bearing; they do not forbid alternatives or smuggle in the paper's central result. The skeptic's concern that Mode 3 does not uniquely separate MIM_B from top-layer-mediated response is an identifiability or model-correctness question, not a circularity, because no parameter is adjusted to force the bottom-layer features to appear. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on two externally established pillars (the double-layer capacitor model of Ref. 41 and the MIM linear-response theory of Ref. 37, the authors' own prior work) plus one new enabling premise (microwave transparency of a gapped layer) that is validated only by an FEA simulation containing a free Landau-level broadening parameter γN. No invented physical entities are introduced; the sole new object is the measurement technique itself.

free parameters (1)
  • Landau level broadening γN = not reported
    Free broadening parameter in the FEA simulation of the MIM response (SI Eq. S1). Values are not stated, so the claimed correspondence between simulated and measured MIM maps in Fig. 3(a-b) has unquantified fitting degrees of freedom.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption MIM linear-response model: Im MIM ∝ ∫_q χ(ω≈0,q) e^(-2|q|d)/|q|² (Eq. 1 and SI Eq. S2, from Ref. 37).
    The interpretation of MIM-Im as a probe of charge compressibility is taken from the authors' prior PRB paper. It is published and externally checkable, but it is the theoretical core of the readout.
  • domain assumption Ideal double-layer capacitor electrostatics of Eq. (3a-3b) with fixed capacitances CM = 72 nF/cm² and CB = 95 nF/cm² (from Ref. 41).
    Assumes uniform carrier densities, no interlayer tunneling, and fixed geometric capacitances. This model underlies every quantitative extraction in the paper: µB(nB), gap size, negative compressibility, and the disorder maps.
  • domain assumption Single-particle graphene Landau level spectrum µ(n) = ±vF sqrt(2ℏeB|N(n)|).
    Used as the known calibration of the top sensor-layer chemical potential at fixed filling. Ignores interaction corrections to µT, which is acceptable at νT = −2 but assumed without discussion.
  • domain assumption A gapped, incompressible top layer becomes microwave-transparent (T → Id).
    Operating premise of Mode 3 (direct subsurface microscopy). Justified by the GHz photon energy being far below the gap scale, but validated only indirectly through the FEA simulation with free broadening parameters.
  • domain assumption Conductivities from Ref. 43 (Novoselov et al. 2005) describe this device's layers.
    The simulation imports σxx(n) from transport data of a different graphene sample, including disorder-induced Landau level broadening. This assumes the disorder and LL widths of the present device match that reference.
  • domain assumption FEA modeling with longitudinal conductivity only, tip at sample center, σxy irrelevant.
    The simulation drops transverse conductivity by placing the tip at the bulk center. This assumes a bulk-dominated signal with negligible edge-state contribution.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of 3D microwave imaging of a van der Waals heterostructure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JKMPKZDQ

@misc{pith2026250818365,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: 3D microwave imaging of a van der Waals heterostructure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JKMPKZDQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18365}
}
read the original abstract

Van der Waals (vdW) heterostructures offer a tunable platform for the realization of emergent phenomena in layered electron systems. While scanning probe microscopy techniques have proven useful for the characterization of surface states and 2D crystals, the subsurface imaging of quantum phenomena in multi-layer systems presents a significant challenge. In 3D heterostructures, states that occupy different planes can simultaneously contribute to the signal detected by the microscope probe, which complicates image analysis and interpretation. Here we present a quantum imaging technique that offers a glimpse into the third dimension by resolving states out of plane: it extracts the charge density landscape of individual atomic planes inside a vdW heterostructure, layer by layer. As a proof-of-concept, we perform layer-resolved imaging of quantum Hall states and charge disorder in double-layer graphene using milliKelvin microwave impedance microscopy. Here the discrete energy spectrum of the top layer enables transmission of microwaves through gapped states, thus opening direct access to quantum phases in the subsurface layer. Resolving how charge is distributed out-of-plane offers a direct probe of interlayer screening, revealing signatures of negative quantum capacitance driven by many-body correlations. At the same time, we extract key features of the band structure and thermodynamics, including gap sizes. Notably, by imaging the charge distribution on different atomic planes beneath the surface, we shed light on the roles of surface impurities and screening on the stability of fractional quantum Hall states. We also show that the uppermost graphene layer can serve as a top gate: This unlocks access to a wide range of phenomena that require displacement field control, from fractional Chern insulators in Moir\'e superlattices to correlated states in multilayer graphene.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Visualizing incommensurate inter-valley coherent states in rhombohedral trilayer graphene,

    Yiwen Liu, Ambikesh Gupta, Youngjoon Choi, Yaar Vituri, Hari Stoyanov, Jiewen Xiao, Yanzhen Wang, Haibiao Zhou, Barun Barick, Takashi Taniguchi, et al., “Visualizing incommensurate inter-valley coherent states in rhombohedral trilayer graphene,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.11163 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Superconducting gaps re- vealed by stm measurements on la2prni2o7 thin films at ambient pressure,

    Shengtai Fan, Mengjun Ou, Marius Scholten, Qing Li, Zhiyuan Shang, Yi Wang, Jiasen Xu, Huan Yang, Ilya M Eremin, and Hai-Hu Wen, “Superconducting gaps re- vealed by stm measurements on la2prni2o7 thin films at ambient pressure,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.01788 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Unconventional sequence of fractional quantum hall states in suspended graphene,

    Benjamin E Feldman, Benjamin Krauss, Jurgen H Smet, and Amir Yacoby, “Unconventional sequence of fractional quantum hall states in suspended graphene,” Science 337, 1196–1199 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Fractional quantum hall phase transi- tions and four-flux states in graphene,

    Benjamin E Feldman, Andrei J Levin, Benjamin Krauss, Dmitry A Abanin, Bertrand I Halperin, Jurgen H Smet, and Amir Yacoby, “Fractional quantum hall phase transi- tions and four-flux states in graphene,” Physical Review Letters 111, 076802 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Chern mosaic and berry-curvature mag- netism in magic-angle graphene,

    Sameer Grover, Matan Bocarsly, Aviram Uri, Petr Stepanov, Giorgio Di Battista, Indranil Roy, Jiewen Xiao, Alexander Y Meltzer, Yuri Myasoedov, Keshav Pareek, et al., “Chern mosaic and berry-curvature mag- netism in magic-angle graphene,” Nature physics 18, 885–892 (2022)

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Imaging of coulomb-driven quantum hall edge states,

    Keji Lai, Worasom Kundhikanjana, Michael A Kelly, Zhi-Xun Shen, Javad Shabani, and Mansour Shayegan, “Imaging of coulomb-driven quantum hall edge states,” Physical review letters 107, 176809 (2011)

    work page 2011

  7. [7]

    Unconventional correlation between quantum hall transport quantization and bulk state filling in gated graphene devices,

    Yong-Tao Cui, Bo Wen, Eric Y Ma, Georgi Diankov, Zheng Han, Francois Amet, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, David Goldhaber-Gordon, Cory R Dean, et al., “Unconventional correlation between quantum hall transport quantization and bulk state filling in gated graphene devices,” Physical Review Letters 117, 186601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Imaging quantum spin hall edges in monolayer wte2,

    Yanmeng Shi, Joshua Kahn, Ben Niu, Zaiyao Fei, Bosong Sun, Xinghan Cai, Brian A Francisco, Di Wu, Zhi-Xun Shen, Xiaodong Xu, et al., “Imaging quantum spin hall edges in monolayer wte2,” Science advances 5, eaat8799 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 58 references
  1. [9]

    Visualization of an axion insulating state at the transition between 2 chiral quantum anomalous hall states,

    Monica Allen, Yongtao Cui, Eric Yue Ma, Masataka Mogi, Minoru Kawamura, Ion Cosma Fulga, David Goldhaber-Gordon, Yoshinori Tokura, and Zhi-Xun Shen, “Visualization of an axion insulating state at the transition between 2 chiral quantum anomalous hall states,” Proceedings of th...

    2019

  2. [10]

    High-resolution capacitance measurement and potentiometry by force microscopy,

    Yves Martin, David W Abraham, and H Kumar Wick- ramasinghe, “High-resolution capacitance measurement and potentiometry by force microscopy,” Applied Physics Letters 52, 1103–1105 (1988)

    1988

  3. [11]

    Kelvin probe force microscopy,

    Manuel Nonnenmacher, MP o’Boyle, and H Kumar Wickramasinghe, “Kelvin probe force microscopy,” Ap- plied physics letters 58, 2921–2923 (1991)

    1991

  4. [12]

    Scanning single-electron transistor microscopy: Imag- ing individual charges,

    MJ Yoo, TA Fulton, HF Hess, RL Willett, LN Dun- kleberger, RJ Chichester, LN Pfeiffer, and KW West, “Scanning single-electron transistor microscopy: Imag- ing individual charges,” Science 276, 579–582 (1997)

    1997

  5. [13]

    Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene,

    Yuanbo Zhang, Tsung-Ta Tang, Caglar Girit, Zhao Hao, Michael C Martin, Alex Zettl, Michael F Crommie, Y Ron Shen, and Feng Wang, “Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene,” Nature 459, 820–823 (2009). 10

    2009

  6. [14]

    Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlat- tices,

    Yuan Cao, Valla Fatemi, Ahmet Demir, Shiang Fang, Spencer L Tomarken, Jason Y Luo, Javier D Sanchez-Yamagishi, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Efthimios Kaxiras, et al. , “Correlated insulator be- haviour at half-filling in magic-angle graphene superlat- tices,” Nature 556,...

    2018

  7. [15]

    Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Lei Wang, En-Min Shih, Augusto Ghiotto, Lede Xian, Daniel A Rhodes, Cheng Tan, Martin Claassen, Dante M Kennes, Yusong Bai, Bumho Kim, et al., “Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature materials 19, 861–866 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    Charge-order-enhanced capacitance in semicon- ductor moir´ e superlattices,

    Tingxin Li, Jiacheng Zhu, Yanhao Tang, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Veit Elser, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Charge-order-enhanced capacitance in semicon- ductor moir´ e superlattices,” Nature Nanotechnology16, 1068–1072 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Sig- natures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted mote2,

    Jiaqi Cai, Eric Anderson, Chong Wang, Xiaowei Zhang, Xiaoyu Liu, William Holtzmann, Yinong Zhang, Fengren Fan, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, et al., “Sig- natures of fractional quantum anomalous hall states in twisted mote2,” Nature 622, 63–68 (2023)

    2023

  10. [18]

    Ferro- magnetism and topology of the higher flat band in a frac- tional chern insulator,

    Heonjoon Park, Jiaqi Cai, Eric Anderson, Xiao-Wei Zhang, Xiaoyu Liu, William Holtzmann, Weijie Li, Chong Wang, Chaowei Hu, Yuzhou Zhao, et al., “Ferro- magnetism and topology of the higher flat band in a frac- tional chern insulator,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.09591 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Local probe of bulk and edge states in a fractional chern insulator,

    Zhurun Ji, Heonjoon Park, Mark E Barber, Chaowei Hu, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jiun-Haw Chu, Xi- aodong Xu, and Zhi-Xun Shen, “Local probe of bulk and edge states in a fractional chern insulator,” Nature 635, 578–583 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Correlated insulating states at frac- tional fillings of moir´ e superlattices,

    Yang Xu, Song Liu, Daniel A Rhodes, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, James Hone, Veit Elser, Kin Fai Mak, and Jie Shan, “Correlated insulating states at frac- tional fillings of moir´ e superlattices,” Nature 587, 214– 218 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Thermodynamic evidence of fractional chern insulator in moir´ e mote2,

    Yihang Zeng, Zhengchao Xia, Kaifei Kang, Jiacheng Zhu, Patrick Kn¨ uppel, Chirag Vaswani, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Kin Fai Mak, and Jie Shan, “Thermodynamic evidence of fractional chern insulator in moir´ e mote2,” Nature622, 69–73 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Optical readout of the chemical poten- tial of two-dimensional electrons,

    Zhengchao Xia, Yihang Zeng, Bowen Shen, Roei Dery, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Optical readout of the chemical poten- tial of two-dimensional electrons,” Nature Photonics 18, 344–349 (2024)

    2024

  15. [23]

    Spin and valley states in gate-defined bilayer graphene quantum dots,

    Marius Eich, Franti ˇ sek Herman, Riccardo Pisoni, Hiske Overweg, Annika Kurzmann, Yongjin Lee, Peter Rick- haus, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Manfred Sigrist, Thomas Ihn, and Klaus Ensslin, “Spin and valley states in gate-defined bilayer graphene quantum dots,” Phys. Re...

    2018

  16. [24]

    Gate-defined confinement in bilayer graphene-hexagonal boron nitride hybrid de- vices,

    Augustinus (Stijn) M. Goossens, Stefanie C. M. Driessen, Tim A. Baart, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Lieven M. K. Vandersypen, “Gate-defined confinement in bilayer graphene-hexagonal boron nitride hybrid de- vices,” Nano Letters 12, 4656–4660 (2012)

    2012

  17. [25]

    Gate defined quantum confinement in suspended bilayer graphene,

    Monica Allen, Jens Martin, and Amir Yacoby, “Gate defined quantum confinement in suspended bilayer graphene,” Nature communications 3, 934 (2012)

    2012

  18. [26]

    Imaging inter-valley coherent order in magic- angle twisted trilayer graphene,

    Hyunjin Kim, Youngjoon Choi, ´Etienne Lantagne- Hurtubise, Cyprian Lewandowski, Alex Thomson, Lingyuan Kong, Haoxin Zhou, Eli Baum, Yiran Zhang, Ludwig Holleis, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Andrea F. Young, Jason Alicea, and Stevan Nadj- Perge, “Imaging inter-valley cohe...

    2023

  19. [27]

    Correlated in- sulator and chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral- stacked graphene,

    Tonghang Han, Zhengguang Lu, Giovanni Scuri, Jiho Sung, Jue Wang, Tianyi Han, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Hongkun Park, and Long Ju, “Correlated in- sulator and chern insulators in pentalayer rhombohedral- stacked graphene,” Nature Nanotechnology 19, 181–187 (2024)

    2024

  20. [28]

    Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene,

    Zhengguang Lu, Tonghang Han, Yuxuan Yao, Aidan Reddy, Jixiang Yang, Junseok Seo, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Long Ju, “Fractional quantum anomalous hall effect in multilayer graphene,” Nature 626, 759–764 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Nanoscale electrostatic control in ultra clean van der waals heterostructures by local anodic oxidation of graphite gates,

    Liam A. Cohen, Noah L. Samuelson, Taige Wang, Kai Klocke, Cian C. Reeves, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Sagar Vijay, Michael P. Zaletel, and An- drea F. Young, “Nanoscale electrostatic control in ultra clean van der waals heterostructures by local anodic oxidation of grap...

    2024

  22. [30]

    Charged im- purity scattering in top-gated graphene nanostructures,

    Zhun-Yong Ong and Massimo V Fischetti, “Charged im- purity scattering in top-gated graphene nanostructures,” Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 86, 121409 (2012)

    2012

  23. [31]

    Imaging local discharge cas- cades for correlated electrons in ws2/wse2 moir´ e super- lattices,

    Hongyuan Li, Shaowei Li, Mit H Naik, Jingxu Xie, Xinyu Li, Emma Regan, Danqing Wang, Wenyu Zhao, Kentaro Yumigeta, Mark Blei, et al., “Imaging local discharge cas- cades for correlated electrons in ws2/wse2 moir´ e super- lattices,” Nature Physics 17, 1114–1119 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,

    Yonglong Xie, Andrew T Pierce, Jeong Min Park, Daniel E Parker, Eslam Khalaf, Patrick Ledwith, Yuan Cao, Seung Hwan Lee, Shaowen Chen, Patrick R For- rester, et al., “Fractional chern insulators in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature 600, 439–443 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Negative compressibility of interacting two-dimensional electron and quasiparticle gases,

    JP Eisenstein, LN Pfeiffer, and KW West, “Negative compressibility of interacting two-dimensional electron and quasiparticle gases,” Physical review letters 68, 674 (1992)

    1992

  26. [34]

    Imaging two-dimensional generalized wigner crystals,

    Hongyuan Li, Shaowei Li, Emma C Regan, Danqing Wang, Wenyu Zhao, Salman Kahn, Kentaro Yumigeta, Mark Blei, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, et al., “Imaging two-dimensional generalized wigner crystals,” Nature 597, 650–654 (2021)

    2021

  27. [35]

    High spatial resolution charge sensing of quantum hall states,

    Cheng-Li Chiu, Taige Wang, Ruihua Fan, Kenji Watan- abe, Takashi Taniguchi, Xiaomeng Liu, Michael P Zaletel, and Ali Yazdani, “High spatial resolution charge sensing of quantum hall states,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.10961 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Mil- likelvin microwave impedance microscopy in a dry dilu- tion refrigerator,

    Leonard Weihao Cao, Chen Wu, Rajarshi Bhat- tacharyya, Ruolun Zhang, and Monica T. Allen, “Mil- likelvin microwave impedance microscopy in a dry dilu- tion refrigerator,” Review of Scientific Instruments 94, 093705 (2023)

    2023

  29. [37]

    Probing the edge states of chern in- sulators using microwave impedance microscopy,

    Taige Wang, Chen Wu, Masataka Mogi, Minoru Kawa- mura, Yoshinori Tokura, Zhi-Xun Shen, Yi-Zhuang You, and Monica T Allen, “Probing the edge states of chern in- sulators using microwave impedance microscopy,” Phys- ical Review B 108, 235432 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    The 11 electronic properties of graphene,

    Antonio H Castro Neto, Francisco Guinea, Nuno MR Peres, Kostya S Novoselov, and Andre K Geim, “The 11 electronic properties of graphene,” Reviews of modern physics 81, 109–162 (2009)

    2009

  31. [39]

    Fractional and integer quan- tum hall effects in the zeroth landau level in graphene,

    Dmitry A. Abanin, Benjamin E. Feldman, Amir Yacoby, and Bertrand I. Halperin, “Fractional and integer quan- tum hall effects in the zeroth landau level in graphene,” Phys. Rev. B 88, 115407 (2013)

    2013

  32. [40]

    Com- pressibility of the two-dimensional electron gas: Measure- ments of the zero-field exchange energy and fractional quantum hall gap,

    J. P. Eisenstein, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, “Com- pressibility of the two-dimensional electron gas: Measure- ments of the zero-field exchange energy and fractional quantum hall gap,” Phys. Rev. B 50, 1760–1778 (1994)

    1994

  33. [41]

    Di- rect measurement of the fermi energy in graphene using a double-layer heterostructure,

    Seyoung Kim, Insun Jo, D. C. Dillen, D. A. Ferrer, B. Fal- lahazad, Z. Yao, S. K. Banerjee, and E. Tutuc, “Di- rect measurement of the fermi energy in graphene using a double-layer heterostructure,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 116404 (2012)

    2012

  34. [42]

    Edge channels of broken-symmetry quan- tum hall states in graphene visualized by atomic force microscopy,

    Sungmin Kim, Johannes Schwenk, Daniel Walkup, Yi- hang Zeng, Fereshte Ghahari, Son T Le, Marlou R Slot, Julian Berwanger, Steven R Blankenship, Kenji Watan- abe, et al., “Edge channels of broken-symmetry quan- tum hall states in graphene visualized by atomic force microscopy,”...

    2021

  35. [43]

    Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene,

    Kostya S Novoselov, Andre K Geim, Sergei Vladimirovich Morozov, Dingde Jiang, Michail I Katsnelson, Irina V Grigorieva, Sergey V Dubonos, and Alexandr A Firsov, “Two-dimensional gas of massless dirac fermions in graphene,” nature 438, 197–200 (2005)

    2005

  36. [44]

    Flavour hund’s coupling, correlated chern gaps, and diffusivity in moir\’e flat bands,

    Jeong Min Park, Yuan Cao, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Flavour hund’s coupling, correlated chern gaps, and diffusivity in moir\’e flat bands,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2008.12296 (2020)

    2008 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Cascade of phase transitions and dirac revivals in magic- angle graphene,

    Uri Zondiner, Asaf Rozen, Daniel Rodan-Legrain, Yuan Cao, Raquel Queiroz, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watan- abe, Yuval Oreg, Felix von Oppen, Ady Stern, et al., “Cascade of phase transitions and dirac revivals in magic- angle graphene,” Nature 582, 203–208 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Scaling in plateau- to-plateau transition: A direct connection of quantum hall systems with the anderson localization model,

    Wanli Li, C. L. Vicente, J. S. Xia, W. Pan, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, “Scaling in plateau- to-plateau transition: A direct connection of quantum hall systems with the anderson localization model,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 216801 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Lecture notes on quantum hall effect,

    Dan Arovas, “Lecture notes on quantum hall effect,” https://courses.physics.ucsd.edu/2019/Spring/ physics230/LECTURES/QHE.pdf, accessed: 2025-6-24

    2019

  40. [48]

    Integer quantum hall transition on a tight-binding lattice,

    Martin Puschmann, Philipp Cain, Michael Schreiber, and Thomas Vojta, “Integer quantum hall transition on a tight-binding lattice,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 121301 (2019)

    2019

  41. [49]

    Percolation, quantum tunnelling and the integer hall effect,

    JT Chalker and PD Coddington, “Percolation, quantum tunnelling and the integer hall effect,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 21, 2665 (1988)

    1988

  42. [50]

    Evolution of landau levels into edge states in graphene,

    Guohong Li, Adina Luican-Mayer, Dmitry Abanin, Leonid Levitov, and Eva Y Andrei, “Evolution of landau levels into edge states in graphene,” Nature communica- tions 4, 1744 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    Absence of edge reconstruction for quan- tum hall edge channels in graphene devices,

    Alexis Coissard, Adolfo G Grushin, C´ ecile Repellin, Louis Veyrat, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Fr´ ed´ eric Gay, Herv´ e Courtois, Hermann Sellier, and Ben- jamin Sac´ ep´ e, “Absence of edge reconstruction for quan- tum hall edge channels in graphene devices,” Science...

    2023

  44. [52]

    Visualizing broken symmetry and topological defects in a quantum hall ferromagnet,

    Xiaomeng Liu, Gelareh Farahi, Cheng-Li Chiu, Zlatko Papic, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Michael P Zaletel, and Ali Yazdani, “Visualizing broken symmetry and topological defects in a quantum hall ferromagnet,” Science 375, 321–326 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Universal conductance fluctua- tions in nanoscale topological insulator devices,

    Arman Rashidi, Robert Kealhofer, Alexander C Lygo, and Susanne Stemmer, “Universal conductance fluctua- tions in nanoscale topological insulator devices,” Applied Physics Letters 122 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Edge mode percolation and equilibration in the topological insulator cadmium arsenide,

    Simon Munyan, Binghao Guo, William Huynh, Victor Huang, and Susanne Stemmer, “Edge mode percolation and equilibration in the topological insulator cadmium arsenide,” npj Quantum Materials 8, 70 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    A magnetic heterostructure of topologi- cal insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator,

    M Mogi, M Kawamura, R Yoshimi, A Tsukazaki, Y Kozuka, N Shirakawa, KS Takahashi, M Kawasaki, and Y Tokura, “A magnetic heterostructure of topologi- cal insulators as a candidate for an axion insulator,” Na- ture materials 16, 516–521 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    Mechani- cal cleaning of graphene,

    AM Goossens, VE Calado, A Barreiro, K Watan- abe, T Taniguchi, and LMK Vandersypen, “Mechani- cal cleaning of graphene,” Applied Physics Letters 100 (2012)

    2012

  49. [57]

    Quartz tuning fork based microwave impedance microscopy,

    Yong-Tao Cui, Eric Yue Ma, and Zhi-Xun Shen, “Quartz tuning fork based microwave impedance microscopy,” Re- view of Scientific Instruments 87 (2016)

    2016

  50. [58]

    Mi- crowave impedance microscopy and its application to quantum materials,

    Mark E Barber, Eric Yue Ma, and Zhi-Xun Shen, “Mi- crowave impedance microscopy and its application to quantum materials,” Nature Reviews Physics 4, 61–74 (2022). SUPPLEMENT AR Y INFORMA TION Experimental methods. The dual-gated graphene device was fabricated using a standard ...

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.