Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 163 references

Two stars in M33 and M31 show combined WN and WO spectral features, evidence that massive stars can evolve directly from the nitrogen-rich WN stage to the oxygen-rich WO stage, skipping the carbon-rich WC stage.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

The authors identify a new WN/WO transitional Wolf-Rayet stage in five hot, weak-winded massive stars, implying a direct WN to WO evolutionary path at low metallicity with strong hard ionizing flux.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection Solid two-object discovery of a WN/WO transition; the long-lived evolutionary stage and cosmic role need calibration before they can carry the abstract. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.18410 v1 pith:6RANSV53 submitted 2025-08-25 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE

Discovery of a new transitional type of evolved massive stars with hard ionizing flux

Andreas A.C. Sander , Roel R. Lefever , Joris Josiek , Erin R. Higgins , Raphael Hirschi , Lidia M. Oskinova , Daniel Pauli , Max Pritzkuleit
show 7 more authors
John S. Gallagher Wolf-Rainer Hamann Ilya Mandel Varsha Ramachandran Tomer Shenar Helge Todt Jorick S. Vink
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords Wolf-Rayet starsWN/WO transitionmassive star evolutionlow metallicityionizing feedbackhelium ionizationstellar windsstellar abundances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes five extremely hot, hydrogen-free Wolf-Rayet stars and finds that two of them, one in the Triangulum Galaxy and one in Andromeda, have spectra that combine nitrogen lines typical of WN stars with oxygen lines typical of WO stars. The authors argue these are not unresolved binary pairs but genuinely transitional objects, which they name WN/WO. They conclude that at low metallicity, massive stars can skip the usual WC phase entirely and evolve directly from WN to WO, and that the known single WN2 stars are the immediate precursors of this new stage. If correct, this revises the standard picture of Wolf-Rayet evolution and identifies a previously hidden population that emits a large flux of helium-ionizing photons, with direct consequences for interpreting highly ionized galaxies, especially at high redshift.

Core claim

The paper claims that two objects—M33WR 206 and M31WR 99-1—are neither WN stars with odd extra lines nor WO stars with leftover nitrogen, but a genuinely new transitional type: WN/WO. Their spectra show nitrogen abundances typical of WN stars, oxygen abundances of about 0.5–1.5% by mass, and carbon abundances higher than oxygen but still much lower than in established WO stars. The authors rule out a WN+WO binary or chance superposition by showing that combined template spectra cannot reproduce the observed line profiles. They further connect all three known single WN2 stars (WR 2, BAT99 2, BAT99 5) to this sequence, arguing that WN2 stars and WN/WO stars form an evolutionary chain. Using ev

What carries the argument

The analysis rests on hydrodynamically consistent stellar-atmosphere models, in which the wind velocity and mass-loss rate are computed from stellar parameters rather than assumed, breaking the parameter degeneracies that plague optically thick Wolf-Rayet winds. These models yield effective temperatures, masses, and surface abundances for each star. The second key ingredient is the surface abundance pattern itself: the simultaneous presence of nitrogen from CNO burning and small amounts of carbon, oxygen, and neon from helium burning identifies a partially mixed layer, and evolutionary tracks that include overshooting beyond the helium-burning core are required to make that transition compos

Load-bearing premise

The cosmic significance of the WN/WO stage rests on it being long-lived, which requires extra mixing beyond the helium-burning core (overshooting) and a prior episode of strong mass loss; if real core mixing is weaker, stars pass through the transition composition almost immediately.

What would settle it

Detect radial-velocity variability with an orbital period in M33WR 206 or M31WR 99-1 while the emission lines remain single, or resolve the emission lines into two components; either observation would show that the WN/WO spectrum is a binary superposition rather than a single-star transition stage.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Low-metallicity massive stars that shed their hydrogen envelopes can spend a substantial fraction of their helium-burning lifetime in a hot, weak-winded stage that is a strong source of He II ionizing photons.
  • The scarcity of WC stars in low-metallicity populations is naturally explained: the WN-to-WO path bypasses the WC spectral appearance entirely.
  • Population synthesis and galaxy-evolution models must include weak-winded, hot WR stars and core-helium overshooting to reproduce high-ionization nebular emission seen in local and high-redshift galaxies.
  • Stars following the WN2→WN/WO path have inferred current masses around 13–34 solar masses, high enough that they likely end as black holes, possibly by direct collapse, linking this stage to black hole remnant masses.
  • The weak emission lines of these stars mean they can hide in integrated galaxy spectra, so their ionizing contribution may be systematically underestimated in unresolved populations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If WN/WO stars are as common at very low metallicity as the paper suggests, high-redshift galaxies with strong nebular He II 4686 Å but no broad WR features may be powered by dozens to hundreds of such stars; targeted searches should look for weak O VI 3811 Å emission in stacked spectra.
  • The newly identified neon feature near 1720 Å in WN2 stars, attributed to Ne V rather than N IV, could serve as a spectroscopic clock for how close a WN star is to the WN/WO transition; archival UV spectra of other early WN stars could test this without new observations.
  • The paper's custom evolution models require a large mass-loss episode before the WR stage, possibly from a companion interaction; if that episode is binary-driven rather than intrinsic, the inferred rates of single-star black hole formation from this channel would be overestimated.
  • The required overshooting also changes the final carbon and oxygen structure of the core, so WN/WO stars may indirectly constrain the compactness of the presupernova core and the outcome of core collapse.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength quantitative spectral analysis of five early-type Wolf-Rayet stars (M33WR 206, M31WR 99-1, WR 2, BAT99 2, BAT99 5) using hydrodynamically-consistent PoWR atmosphere models. It argues that M33WR 206 and M31WR 99-1 form a new WN/WO transition class, showing WN-like nitrogen features together with WO-like oxygen features at low carbon abundance; that the known WN2 stars are immediate precursors; and that these objects represent a direct WN-to-WO evolutionary channel at low metallicity that skips the WC stage. The paper derives very hot temperatures (120–180 kK), comparatively weak winds, and high He II ionizing photon fluxes (log Q_HeII ≈ 48.3–49.0 s^-1), and discusses consequences for the ionizing budgets of low-metallicity and high-redshift galaxies. Custom GENEC and MESA models are used to demonstrate how the WN/WO stage could be produced and how long it might persist.

Significance. If the interpretation holds, the paper identifies a genuinely new Wolf-Rayet transition stage and challenges the universality of the canonical WN→WC→WO sequence. The observational core is strong: first UV coverage for M33WR 206, hydrodynamically-consistent wind models that break the usual WR parameter degeneracy, detailed abundance constraints, and explicit exclusion of WN+WO binarity/crowding through X-ray faintness and mock co-adds. The ionizing-flux tabulation (Table 2) gives concrete, falsifiable numbers. However, the broader claims that the WN/WO stage lasts a considerable fraction of the He-burning lifetime and is common at low metallicity rest on uncalibrated model inputs: enhanced core-He overshoot and an ad hoc pre-WR mass-loss episode. The paper itself acknowledges most of these caveats, but they are placed in Methods while the abstract and Section 4 state the strongest version. The manuscript is valuable as an observational discovery, but the evolutionary and cosmic implications need either additional constraints or a substantial reframing.

major comments (4)
  1. [Methods, 'Transition from WC/WO to WN/WO spectral appearance'; EDF 6–8] The Abstract and Section 4 claim that the WN/WO stage can last 'a considerable fraction' of the He-burning lifetime and thereby affect ionizing feedback, but the main demonstration of that longevity is the MESA tracks in EDF 6–8. In those tracks, the WN/WO window (XC > 0.005 and XN > 0.001) is traversed almost immediately without 'step overshoot' during core-He burning; the stage persists only when this overshoot is added. The overshoot is a free, uncalibrated parameter, and the paper itself states that the duration 'depends both on the prior evolution, the assumed mass-loss rate during the WR stage, and the overshooting assumptions.' Because the cosmic-significance argument in Section 4 scales directly with this duration, this is a load-bearing point. A quantitative sensitivity study (e.g., a grid in overshoot strength and WR mass-loss rate, compared with observed WN/WC and WN/WO number
  2. [Methods, 'Mass discrepancy between atmosphere models and structure constraints'] The low-metallicity conclusion is partly imposed rather than measured. For WR 2, the iron abundance is set to 62% solar because higher iron abundances would give a mass above the adopted solution; for M31WR 99-1, a half-solar iron abundance is adopted because a solar-iron model gives ~51 Msun versus a chemically homogeneous He-star structure limit of ~34 Msun. This makes the inference that the WN2/WN/WO phenomenon is connected to low metallicity (Section 3, 'Low metallicity as the origin of the weaker WN2 and WN/WO winds') partly assumption-driven. If the structural limit is not firm — e.g., if the stars are not chemically homogeneous in their interiors, are merger remnants, or if M31WR 99-1's luminosity is diluted — the same spectra could plausibly be fit with higher iron abundances. An independent metallicity diagnostic, or an explicit exploration of the sensitivity of the adopted Z to
  3. [Methods, 'Comparison of the observed HRD positions with evolutionary models'; EDF 9–11] The custom GENEC models in Fig. 4 and EDF 9–11 require a cool-phase mass-loss rate of log Mdot = -3.5 below 10 kK to strip the envelope, roughly 2–3 dex above standard cool-star prescriptions, with no identified physical mechanism; the text allows that this could instead be caused by companion interaction or eruptions. These tracks also reproduce the WN/WO abundance window only with additional mixing assumptions. Section 3 uses them to conclude that stars 'spend most of their He-burning lifetime' in the observed HRD region, but this is a demonstration with tuned inputs. The claim that the direct WN-to-WO path is common at low metallicity is therefore not yet established. A testable prediction for the pre-WR mass-loss episode, or an observational calibration, should be added, or the conclusion should be restricted to a proof of concept.
  4. [Methods, 'Consequences of a lower intrinsic luminosity of M31WR 99-1'] The treatment of M31WR 99-1 is candid, but the statement that dilution would be 'only a scaling effect' is stronger than the presented test. The alternative model assumes one specific lower luminosity (log L/Lsun = 5.6), still underpredicts O VI 3811 Å, and does not re-derive the abundance uncertainties under the alternative parameters. Since this object is one of only two pillars of the WN/WO class and is the strongest He II ionizing source in Table 2, the luminosity and dilution uncertainties should propagate into the headline Q_HeII value, and the classification should be marked as provisional pending UV spectroscopy.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] The column heading for WR 2 reads 'WN2/WO1'; it should be 'WN2' to match the text and the other WN2 stars.
  2. [Fig. 4 and Section 3] There are inconsistent object names: Fig. 4 and one sentence in Section 3 refer to 'M33WR 99-1', which should be 'M31WR 99-1'; conversely, Methods 'Mass discrepancy' refers to 'M31WR 206', which should be 'M33WR 206'.
  3. [EDF 7 and EDF 8 captions] Both captions say 'without (left) and with (left) overshooting'; the second should be 'with (right)'.
  4. [Section 3 and EDF 11] Minor language issues: 'changes the significantly enhances the lifetime' should be 'significantly enhances the lifetime', and 'curstom GENEC model' should be 'custom GENEC model'.
  5. [Methods] Typo: 'population sythesis' should be 'population synthesis'. Also, 'earlier Cosmic times' in Section 4 appears capitalized mid-sentence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; the observational classification and abundance analysis are independent of the evolutionary interpretation.

full rationale

The central discovery—that M33WR 206 and M31WR 99-1 show mixed WN/WO spectral features—is based on detailed non-LTE atmosphere modeling (PoWR) with hydrodynamically consistent winds. The derived parameters (T_eff, log L, masses, abundances, mass-loss rates) come from fitting the observed spectra and photometry, not from the evolutionary models. The abundance pattern (simultaneous presence of nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen) is a spectroscopic result, and the conclusion that these are transitional objects follows from comparing this pattern to known WN, WC, and WO stars, plus a demonstration that binary/crowding alternatives are unlikely. The low-metallicity inference has independent support from the host galaxies (LMC, M33 outskirts, Galactic position of WR 2) and from the wind theory; the mass-discrepancy analysis is used only as a plausibility check on the iron abundance, not as the sole evidence. The 'considerable fraction of their lifetime' statement is explicitly caveated: the duration depends on prior evolution, mass-loss assumption, and overshooting parameters, and the paper presents these as demonstration models rather than unique predictions. No equation or parameter in the paper reduces to itself by construction; no self-citation is load-bearing for the main classification claim. The paper even identifies the need for future constraints on mixing and pre-WR mass loss. Therefore, no circular step meets the required evidentiary standard.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

5 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper's central discovery is observational, but its evolutionary and metallicity interpretations rely on several fitted or assumed ingredients: wind clumping parameters, iron abundances chosen to satisfy a structural mass limit, an ad hoc cool-stage mass-loss episode, and an overshoot parameter that extends the transition stage lifetime. No genuinely new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • Wind clumping parameters D_inf and v_cl = D_inf = 10-50, v_cl = 150-500 km/s (Table 1)
    Chosen per star to reproduce emission line strengths and terminal velocities; directly affect mass-loss rate and temperature scale.
  • Iron abundance for WR 2 = 62% solar
    Chosen so the hydrodynamically-consistent mass falls below the homogeneous He-star mass limit; higher Z would push mass to about 24 M_sun.
  • Iron abundance for M31WR 99-1 = ~50% solar (LMC-like)
    Chosen so inferred mass (33.7 M_sun) is consistent with the structural constraint; solar Z would require about 51 M_sun.
  • Cool-stage mass-loss rate in GENEC models = 10^-3.5 M_sun/yr below 10 kK
    Ad hoc input needed to strip the hydrogen envelope and return models blueward; not directly observed.
  • Overshooting during core He burning = step overshoot (on) in MESA tracks
    Included to slow the rise of surface C/O and prolong the WN/WO transition stage; the paper states the duration depends on this assumption.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Non-LTE radiative transfer and statistical equilibrium in an expanding atmosphere accurately model these winds.
    The entire parameter derivation uses PoWR; if the atomic data or wind treatment are wrong, temperatures and mass-loss rates shift.
  • domain assumption The studied stars are single (no luminous companion or unresolved crowding).
    Inferred in Methods from X-ray faintness and spectral combination tests; used to model each star with one atmosphere.
  • domain assumption A chemically homogeneous helium star sets the minimum L/M (maximum mass) for hydrogen-free stars.
    Used in Methods 'Mass discrepancy between atmosphere models and structure constraints' to constrain masses and motivate sub-solar iron abundance for WR 2 and M31WR 99-1.
  • domain assumption The recent WR mass-loss prescription from Sander et al. (2023) applies to these stars.
    The GENEC demonstration models use this prescription for T > 95 kK without adjustment; if the prescription is wrong, the lifetime and mass-loss predictions change.
  • ad hoc to paper Enhanced overshooting during core-helium burning occurs.
    Adopted to extend the transition stage; not part of standard published grids and not independently measured.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Discovery of a new transitional type of evolved massive stars with hard ionizing flux." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6RANSV53

@misc{pith2026250818410,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Discovery of a new transitional type of evolved massive stars with hard ionizing flux},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6RANSV53}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18410}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars are the evolved descendants of the most massive stars and show emission-line dominated spectra formed in their powerful stellar winds. Marking the final evolution stage before core collapse, the standard picture of WR stars has been that they evolve through three well-defined spectral subtypes known as WN, WC, and WO. Here, we present a detailed analysis of five objects that defy this scheme, demonstrating that WR stars can also evolve directly from the WN to the WO stage. Our study reveals that this direct transition is connected to low metallicity and weaker winds. The WN/WO stars and their immediate WN precursors are hot and emit a high flux of photons capable of fully ionizing helium. The existence of these stages unveil that high mass stars which manage to shed off their outer hydrogen layers in a low-metallicity environment can spend a considerable fraction of their lifetime in a stage that is difficult to detect in integrated stellar populations, but at the same time yields hard ionizing flux. The identification of the WN to WO evolution path for massive stars has significant implications for understanding the chemical enrichment and ionizing feedback in star-forming galaxies, in particular at earlier cosmic times.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Conti, P. S. On the relationship between Of and WR stars. Memoires of the Societe Royale des Sciences de Liege 9, 193–212 (1975)

    1975

  2. [2]

    Crowther, P. A. Physical Properties of Wolf-Rayet Stars. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 45, 177–219 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Vink, J. S. & de Koter, A. Predictions of variable mass loss for Luminous Blue Variables. Astron. Astrophys. 393, 543–553 (2002)

    2002

  4. [4]

    & Hamann, W.-R

    Gr¨ afener, G. & Hamann, W.-R. Mass loss from late-type WN stars and its Z-dependence. Very massive stars approaching the Eddington limit. Astron. Astrophys. 482, 945–960 (2008)

    2008

  5. [5]

    Sander, A. A. C., Vink, J. S. & Hamann, W. R. Driving classical Wolf-Rayet winds: a Γ- and Z-dependent mass-loss. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 4406– 4425 (2020)

    2020

  6. [6]

    F., Shara, M

    Smith, L. F., Shara, M. M. & Moffat, A. F. J. A three-dimensional classification for WN stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 281, 163–191 (1996)

    1996

  7. [7]

    A., De Marco, O

    Crowther, P. A., De Marco, O. & Barlow, M. J. Quantitative classification of WC and WO stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 296, 367–378 (1998)

    1998

  8. [8]

    On WC and WN Stars

    Gamow, G. On WC and WN Stars. Astrophys. J. 98, 500 (1943)

    1943

  9. [9]

    Wolf-Rayet stars of type WN/WC and mixing processes during core helium burning of massive stars? Astron

    Langer, N. Wolf-Rayet stars of type WN/WC and mixing processes during core helium burning of massive stars? Astron. Astrophys. 248, 531 (1991)

    1991

  10. [10]

    & Charbonnel, C

    Meynet, G., Maeder, A., Schaller, G., Schaerer, D. & Charbonnel, C. Grids of massive stars with high mass loss rates. V. From 12 to 120 M sun at Z=0.001, 0.004, 0.008, 0.020 and 0.040. A&AS 103, 97–105 (1994)

    1994

  11. [11]

    H., Meynet, G., Ekstr¨ om, S

    Groh, J. H., Meynet, G., Ekstr¨ om, S. & Georgy, C. The evolution of massive stars and their spectra. I. A non-rotating 60 Msun star from the zero-age main sequence to the pre-supernova stage. Astron. Astrophys. 564, A30 (2014)

    2014

  12. [12]

    Aadland, E. et al. WO-type Wolf-Rayet Stars: The Last Hurrah of Massive Star Evolution. Astrophys. J. 931, 157 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    & Grove, K

    Massey, P. & Grove, K. The “WN+WC” Wolf-Rayet Stars MR 111 and GP Cep: Spectrum Binaries or Missing Links? Astrophys. J. 344, 870 (1989)

    1989

  14. [14]

    A., Smith, L

    Crowther, P. A., Smith, L. J. & Willis, A. J. Fundamental parameters of Wolf- Rayet stars. V. The nature of the WN/C star WR 8. Astron. Astrophys. 304, 269 (1995). 48

    1995

  15. [15]

    Shara, M. M. et al. The first transition Wolf-Rayet WN/C star in M31. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 455, 3453–3457 (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    Zhang, W. et al. A New Transition Wolf-Rayet WN/C Star in the Milky Way. Astrophys. J. 902, 62 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    J., Aadland, E., Massey, P

    Hillier, D. J., Aadland, E., Massey, P. & Morrell, N. BAT99-9 - a WC4 Wolf- Rayet star with nitrogen emission: evidence for binary evolution? Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 503, 2726–2732 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Aadland, E., Massey, P., Hillier, D. J. & Morrell, N. The Physical Parameters of Four WC-type Wolf-Rayet Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud: Evidence of Evolution. Astrophys. J. 924, 44 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Neugent, K. F. & Massey, P. The Wolf-Rayet Content of M33. Astrophys. J. 733, 123 (2011)

    2011

  20. [20]

    Neugent, K. F. & Massey, P. Newly Discovered Wolf-Rayet Stars in M31.Astron. J. 166, 68 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Monreal-Ibero, A. et al. The Wolf-Rayet star population in the dwarf galaxy ¡ASTROBJ¿NGC 625¡/ASTROBJ¿. Astron. Astrophys. 603, A130 (2017)

    2017

  22. [22]

    Kehrig, C. et al. The extended He II λ4686 emission in the extremely metal- poor galaxy SBS 0335 - 052E seen with MUSE. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 1081–1095 (2018)

    2018

  23. [23]

    Mayya, Y. D. et al. Detection of He ++ ion in the star-forming ring of the Cartwheel using MUSE data and ionizing mechanisms. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 519, 5492–5513 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Carniani, S. et al. Spectroscopic confirmation of two luminous galaxies at a redshift of 14. Nature 633, 318–322 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Castellano, M. et al. JWST NIRSpec Spectroscopy of the Remarkable Bright Galaxy GHZ2/GLASS-z12 at Redshift 12.34. Astrophys. J. 972, 143 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    D’Eugenio, F. et al. JADES: Carbon enrichment 350 Myr after the Big Bang. Astron. Astrophys. 689, A152 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    R., Koesterke, L

    Hamann, W. R., Koesterke, L. & Wessolowski, U. Spectral analyses of the galactic Wolf-Rayet stars : a comprehensive study of the WN class. Astron. Astrophys. 274, 397–414 (1993)

    1993

  28. [28]

    & Hamann, W.-R

    Gr¨ afener, G., Koesterke, L. & Hamann, W.-R. Line-blanketed model atmo- spheres for WR stars. Astron. Astrophys. 387, 244–257 (2002)

    2002

  29. [29]

    & Gr¨ afener, G

    Hamann, W.-R. & Gr¨ afener, G. A temperature correction method for expanding 49 atmospheres. Astron. Astrophys. 410, 993–1000 (2003)

    2003

  30. [30]

    Sander, A. et al. On the consistent treatment of the quasi-hydrostatic layers in hot star atmospheres. Astron. Astrophys. 577, A13 (2015)

    2015

  31. [31]

    Sander, A. A. C. et al. The temperature dependency of Wolf-Rayet-type mass loss. An exploratory study for winds launched by the hot iron bump. Astron. Astrophys. 670, A83 (2023)

    2023

  32. [32]

    & Gr¨ afener, G

    Hamann, W.-R. & Gr¨ afener, G. Grids of model spectra for WN stars, ready for use. Astron. Astrophys. 427, 697–704 (2004)

    2004

  33. [33]

    Lefever, R. R. et al. Exploring the influence of different velocity fields on Wolf- Rayet star spectra. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 521, 1374–1392 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    & Vink, J

    Gr¨ afener, G. & Vink, J. S. Stellar mass-loss near the Eddington limit. Tracing the sub-photospheric layers of classical Wolf-Rayet stars. Astron. Astrophys. 560, A6 (2013)

    2013

  35. [35]

    Grassitelli, L. et al. Subsonic structure and optically thick winds from Wolf- Rayet stars. Astron. Astrophys. 614, A86 (2018)

    2018

  36. [36]

    Tramper, F. et al. Massive stars on the verge of exploding: the properties of oxygen sequence Wolf-Rayet stars. Astron. Astrophys. 581, A110 (2015)

    2015

  37. [37]

    Conti, P. S. & Massey, P. Spectroscopic Studies of Wolf-Rayet Stars. IV. Opti- cal Spectrophotometry of the Emission Lines in Galactic and Large Magellanic Cloud Stars. Astrophys. J. 337, 251 (1989)

    1989

  38. [38]

    E., Hillier, D

    Herald, J. E., Hillier, D. J. & Schulte-Ladbeck, R. E. Tailored Analyses of the WN 8 Stars WR 40 and WR 16. Astrophys. J. 548, 932–952 (2001)

    2001

  39. [39]

    & Liermann, A

    Hamann, W., Gr¨ afener, G. & Liermann, A. The Galactic WN stars. Spectral analyses with line-blanketed model atmospheres versus stellar evolution models with and without rotation. Astron. Astrophys. 457, 1015–1031 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    Hainich, R. et al. Wolf-Rayet stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud. I. Analysis of the single WN stars. Astron. Astrophys. 581, A21 (2015)

    2015

  41. [41]

    Hillier, D. J. & Miller, D. L. Constraints on the Evolution of Massive Stars through Spectral Analysis. I. The WC5 Star HD 165763. Astrophys. J. 519, 354–371 (1999)

    1999

  42. [42]

    Standard models of Wolf-Rayet stars

    Langer, N. Standard models of Wolf-Rayet stars. Astron. Astrophys. 210, 93–113 (1989)

    1989

  43. [43]

    S., de Koter, A

    Gr¨ afener, G., Vink, J. S., de Koter, A. & Langer, N. The Eddington factor as the key to understand the winds of the most massive stars. Evidence for a 50 Γ-dependence of Wolf-Rayet type mass loss.Astron. Astrophys. 535, A56 (2011)

    2011

  44. [44]

    Eldridge, J. J. et al. Binary Population and Spectral Synthesis Version 2.1: Construction, Observational Verification, and New Results. PASA 34, e058 (2017)

    2017

  45. [45]

    Eggenberger, P. et al. Grids of stellar models with rotation. VI. Models from 0.8 to 120 M⊙ at a metallicity Z = 0.006. Astron. Astrophys. 652, A137 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Garner, R. et al. NGC 628 in SIGNALS: Explaining the Abundance-ionization Correlation in H II Regions. Astrophys. J. 978, 70 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Gunawardhana, M. L. P. et al. JADES NIRSpec Spectroscopy of GN-z11: Evi- dence for Wolf-Rayet contribution to stellar populations at 430 Myr after Big Bang? arXiv e-prints arXiv:2504.12584 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Vink, J. S. & de Koter, A. On the metallicity dependence of Wolf-Rayet winds. Astron. Astrophys. 442, 587–596 (2005)

    2005

  49. [49]

    Sander, A. A. C. & Vink, J. S. On the nature of massive helium star winds and Wolf-Rayet-type mass-loss. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 499, 873–892 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    E., Sukhbold, T

    Woosley, S. E., Sukhbold, T. & Janka, H. T. The Birth Function for Black Holes and Neutron Stars in Close Binaries. Astrophys. J. 896, 56 (2020)

    2020

  51. [51]

    Maltsev, K. et al. Explodability criteria for the neutrino-driven supernova mechanism. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2503.23856 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    Schootemeijer, A. et al. An absence of binary companions to Wolf-Rayet stars in the Small Magellanic Cloud: Implications for mass loss and black hole masses at low metallicities. Astron. Astrophys. 689, A157 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Low-metallicity massive single stars with rotation

    Kub´ atov´ a, B.et al. Low-metallicity massive single stars with rotation. II. Pre- dicting spectra and spectral classes of chemically homogeneously evolving stars. Astron. Astrophys. 623, A8 (2019)

    2019

  54. [54]

    Low-metallicity massive single stars with rotation

    Sz´ ecsi, D.et al. Low-metallicity massive single stars with rotation. III. Source of ionization and C-IV emission in I Zw 18. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2506.21442 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    Eldridge, J. J. & Stanway, E. R. New Insights into the Evolution of Massive Stars and Their Effects on Our Understanding of Early Galaxies. Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 60, 455–494 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    & Brinchmann, J

    Shirazi, M. & Brinchmann, J. Strongly star forming galaxies in the local Universe with nebular He II λ4686 emission. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 421, 1043–1063 (2012). 51

    2012

  57. [57]

    & Grillo, C

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Schuldt, S. & Grillo, C. Dissecting the Interstellar Media of a Wolf–Rayet Galaxy at z = 2.76. Astrophys. J. 979, 87 (2025)

    2025

  58. [58]

    On the properties of massive Population III stars and metal-free stellar populations

    Schaerer, D. On the properties of massive Population III stars and metal-free stellar populations. Astron. Astrophys. 382, 28–42 (2002)

    2002

  59. [59]

    Genzel, R. et al. What Powers Ultraluminous IRAS Galaxies? Astrophys. J. 498, 579–605 (1998)

    1998

  60. [60]

    Cleri, N. J. et al. CLEAR: High-ionization [Ne V] λ3426 Emission-line Galaxies at 1.4 < z < 2.3. Astrophys. J. 948, 112 (2023)

    2023

  61. [61]

    J., Norris, R

    Smith, L. J., Norris, R. P. F. & Crowther, P. A. Realistic ionizing fluxes for young stellar populations from 0.05 to 2 Z solar. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 337, 1309–1328 (2002)

    2002

  62. [62]

    & Palacios, A

    Martins, F. & Palacios, A. Spectroscopic evolution of massive stars near the main sequence at low metallicity. Astron. Astrophys. 645, A67 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    Doran, E. I. et al. The VLT-FLAMES Tarantula Survey. XI. A census of the hot luminous stars and their feedback in 30 Doradus. Astron. Astrophys. 558, A134 (2013)

    2013

  64. [64]

    Ramachandran, V. et al. Testing massive star evolution, star formation history, and feedback at low metallicity. Spectroscopic analysis of OB stars in the SMC Wing. Astron. Astrophys. 625, A104 (2019)

    2019

  65. [65]

    Ramachandran, V. et al. Stellar population of the superbubble N 206 in the LMC. II. Parameters of the OB and WR stars, and the total massive star feedback. Astron. Astrophys. 615, A40 (2018)

    2018

  66. [66]

    G., Izotov, Y

    Guseva, N. G., Izotov, Y. I. & Thuan, T. X. A Spectroscopic Study of a Large Sample Of Wolf-Rayet Galaxies. Astrophys. J. 531, 776–803 (2000)

    2000

  67. [67]

    Strom, A. L. et al. Nebular Emission Line Ratios in z 2-3 Star-forming Galax- ies with KBSS-MOSFIRE: Exploring the Impact of Ionization, Excitation, and Nitrogen-to-Oxygen Ratio. Astrophys. J. 836, 164 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    Sanders, R. L. et al. The MOSDEF survey: direct-method metallicities and ISM conditions at z ∼ 1.5-3.5. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 491, 1427–1455 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    Tang, M. et al. JWST/NIRSpec spectroscopy of z = 7-9 star-forming galaxies with CEERS: new insight into bright Ly α emitters in ionized bubbles. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 526, 1657–1686 (2023)

    2023

  70. [70]

    Cameron, A. J. et al. Nebular dominated galaxies: insights into the stellar initial mass function at high redshift. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 534, 523–543 (2024). 52

    2024

  71. [71]

    Cullen, F. et al. The JWST EXCELS survey: an extremely metal-poor galaxy at z = 8 .271 hosting an unusual population of massive stars. arXiv e-prints arXiv:2501.11099 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Lecroq, M. et al. A new prescription for the spectral properties of population III stellar populations. Astron. Astrophys. 695, A17 (2025)

    2025

  73. [73]

    Topping, M. W. et al. Deep Rest-UV JWST/NIRSpec Spectroscopy of Early Galaxies: The Demographics of C IV and N-emitters in the Reionization Era. Astrophys. J. 980, 225 (2025)

    2025

  74. [74]

    A., Conti, P

    van der Hucht, K. A., Conti, P. S., Lundstrom, I. & Stenholm, B. The Sixth Catalogue of Galactic Wolf-Rayet Stars - Their Past and Present. Space Sci. Rev. 28, 227–306 (1981)

    1981

  75. [75]

    Smith, L. F. A revised spectral classification system and a new catalogue for galactic Wolf-Rayet stars. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 138, 109 (1968)

    1968

  76. [76]

    G´ omez-Gonz´ alez, V. M. A.et al. Planetary nebulae with Wolf-Rayet-type cen- tral stars - III. A detailed view of NGC 6905 and its central star. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 509, 974–989 (2022)

    2022

  77. [77]

    Rosslowe, C. K. & Crowther, P. A. Spatial distribution of Galactic Wolf-Rayet stars and implications for the global population. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 447, 2322–2347 (2015)

    2015

  78. [78]

    F., Massey, P

    Neugent, K. F., Massey, P. & Georgy, C. The Wolf-Rayet Content of M31. Astrophys. J. 759, 11 (2012)

    2012

  79. [79]

    & Hamann, W.-R

    Sander, A., Todt, H., Hainich, R. & Hamann, W.-R. The Wolf-Rayet stars in M

  80. [80]

    Analysis of the late-type WN stars

    I. Analysis of the late-type WN stars. Astron. Astrophys. 563, A89 (2014)

    2014

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.