Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 2 minor 57 references

Why Compressed Metal Hydrides are Near-room-temperature Superconductors

T0 review · 3 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the near-room-temperature superconductivity of compressed metal hydrides, though computationally reproducible, is not yet understood, and it sketches an untried formal path to the explanation.

desk verdict The abstract is an honest perspective on hydride superconductivity, but the supplied full text is an unrelated paper, so the actual manuscript cannot be assessed. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18429 v1 pith:II27UA6Y submitted 2025-08-25 cond-mat.supr-con

Warren E. Pickett This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords metalhydridessuperconductivityelectron-phononcouplinghydrogenhigh-pressurephysicshigh-throughputsearchcriticaltemperaturecomputationalmaterialsscience
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper takes the title's question — why compressed metal hydrides superconduct at such high temperatures — and answers that the field does not yet have a real answer. Standard calculations reproduce measured critical temperatures with coupling strengths λ of 2–3, and show that 80–85% of the coupling comes from high-frequency hydrogen vibrations, but the paper argues this is a description rather than an explanation. The paper's central proposal is that previously published but never applied formal developments simplifying atomic displacement effects can unlock the 'why' when combined with computational efficiency and human-guided search. It also touches on the limited success of high-throughput hydride searches as evidence that something deeper is missing.

What carries the argument

The paper's key machinery is a set of formal developments, developed sporadically over several decades, that simplify how atomic displacements enter electron–phonon coupling calculations. Whereas the standard approach treats phonons and coupling matrix elements directly, these developments reorganize the displacement effects to make the underlying physics more transparent and computation lighter. The paper argues that applying these unapplied tools to hydrides is the concrete step that would transform numerical agreement into understanding.

What would settle it

A concrete falsifier: apply the proposed simplified atomic-displacement formalism to a benchmark hydride such as LaH10 and compare the resulting λ and T_c, as well as any new diagnostic variable, with the standard result. If the formalism reproduces only what standard theory already gives, and no new explanatory quantity emerges, then the claimed pathway would be falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the mechanism responsible for the remarkably high critical temperatures in compressed metal hydrides remains unidentified, despite the quantitative success of standard electron-phonon coupling calculations. The paper asserts that the large coupling λ≈2–3 and the dominant contribution (80–85%) from H vibrations are empirical facts that do not by themselves answer why hydrogen is special. It proposes that decades-old formal work on simplifying the effects of atomic displacement, never yet applied to hydrides, can be implemented to yield a deeper understanding, and that this step, together with added computational efficiency and human-learning-guided searches, constitu

Load-bearing premise

The entire proposal rests on the assumption that the previously published simplifications for atomic displacement effects are correct and can be implemented; if those developments are flawed or yield nothing beyond standard calculations, the claimed path to understanding collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the proposed simplifications are implemented, electron-phonon coupling calculations for hydrides could become significantly cheaper, allowing broader exploration of candidate structures.
  • A mechanistic understanding of hydrogen's role could focus high-throughput searches, which so far have produced few higher-Tc hydrides.
  • The reorganized displacement formalism may reveal anharmonic or zero-point-motion contributions that standard harmonic calculations do not capture.
  • Deeper understanding could explain why certain hydrides underperform their computationally predicted critical temperatures.
  • The insights would likely generalize beyond hydrides to any light-element high-pressure superconductor.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper implies that the 'why' may involve more than hydrogen's light mass; as an inference, the untried formalism might expose a qualitative role of hydrogen's large zero-point amplitude in boosting coupling, which would be a testable prediction.
  • If the path succeeds, it could shift the field away from brute-force high-throughput screening toward mechanism-directed design, potentially identifying new families of high-Tc superconductors outside hydrides.
  • A concrete test of the paper's proposal would be to apply the simplified atomic-displacement treatment to a well-studied hydride and check whether it yields a new invariant or scaling that standard theory misses.
  • The paper's critique of high-throughput searches' dearth of success suggests that search spaces are being explored without the guiding principle the formalism is meant to supply; implementing it could retrospectively explain the false positives.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper, as represented by its abstract, asks why compressed metal hydrides become near-room-temperature superconductors and proposes that the answer lies in as-yet-unapplied developments that simplify effects of atomic displacement, combined with added computational efficiency and human learning. The abstract itself states that the "why" is not yet understood and offers no derivation or data. The supplied full text, however, is an entirely different paper, "Tracing Positional Bias in Financial Decision-Making: Mechanistic Insights from Qwen2.5," with an ICAIF '25 ACM reference format. There is no overlap between the abstract's claim about hydride superconductivity and the body text. Consequently, the manuscript cannot be evaluated as a scientific contribution to the topic announced in its title and abstract.

Significance. If the program described in the abstract were actually carried out and validated—for example, by reproducing known critical temperatures such as those of H3S or LaH10, matching or surpassing standard Eliashberg calculations, and guiding new high-throughput searches—it could be a significant contribution to the field. The abstract identifies an important open question and a plausible direction. However, as submitted, the manuscript contains none of that: no derivation, no data, no reproducible code, no machine-checked proofs, and no falsifiable predictions. The only auditable content is the abstract's assertion about external "unapplied developments," which is insufficient for a scientific paper. The significance cannot be assessed because the claimed contribution is absent.

major comments (3)
  1. [Full Text (entirety)] The body text supplied for review is an unrelated paper on positional bias in financial LLM decision-making. It contains no mention of hydrides, electron-phonon coupling, Eliashberg theory, or superconductivity. The central claim of the abstract is therefore entirely unverifiable from the manuscript as supplied; there is no derivation, data, or analysis supporting the proposed "straightforward path." This is a load-bearing gap that cannot be repaired by minor edits.
  2. [Abstract] The key assertion is that "as yet unapplied developments in simplifying effects of atomic displacement" offer a path toward understanding. This is stated without citation, equation, or method name. A referee cannot check whether such developments exist, are mathematically correct, are implementable, or are relevant to compressed metal hydrides. The entire argument rests on this external appeal, so the central thesis is unsupported as written.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract claims "very reasonable agreement with existing high Tc hydrides" and "dearth of success of numerous high throughput searches," but provides no quantitative evidence or references. A supporting manuscript would need to demonstrate, for example, that the proposed simplifications reproduce known Tc values and yield insight beyond standard Eliashberg calculations. None of that evidence is present in the submitted text.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase "straightforward path" is informal and vague; a revision should specify exactly which developments are contemplated and how they would be implemented.
  2. [Full Text heading/format] The supplied full text is formatted as a different ACM paper with its own abstract and keywords. If this is a submission error, the correct manuscript must be provided; as it stands, the body does not correspond to the title or abstract.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the abstract proposes a research pathway and derives no result, so there is no derivation chain to reduce to its inputs.

full rationale

The supplied full text is an unrelated paper on positional bias in financial LLMs, so no derivation chain from the abstract can be audited in the body. Taken on its own, the abstract makes no falsifiable prediction and derives no quantity; it explicitly says the 'why' is not yet understood and proposes that 'as yet unapplied developments in simplifying effects of atomic displacement' could provide a pathway. The statement that 80-85% of lambda is attributable to high-frequency H vibrations and the mention of 'reasonable agreement' are reports of existing computational results, not outputs of a derivation. No equation, fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or load-bearing self-citation appears in the abstract. The only flagged concern is an omitted specification of the 'developments' that the proposal depends on; that is a verifiability and completeness issue, not circularity. Because there is no derivation, there is no circular step to exhibit, and the score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no free parameters or invented entities appear. The argument rests on two background assumptions: that the standard electron-phonon framework is adequate, and that the older formal developments the author references are valid and applicable.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The community-standard Eliashberg framework with electron-phonon coupling lambda is the correct description for hydride superconductivity.
    Abstract states that lambda=2-3 at high frequency reproduces observed Tc, and the paper builds its discussion on this framework.
  • ad hoc to paper The cited 'unapplied developments in simplifying effects of atomic displacement' exist, are valid, and can be combined with computational and human learning to improve hydride understanding.
    The proposal rests entirely on these external developments, but the abstract gives no detail; the full text supplied is a different paper, so this cannot be verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Why Compressed Metal Hydrides are Near-room-temperature Superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/II27UA6Y

@misc{pith2026250818429,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Why Compressed Metal Hydrides are Near-room-temperature Superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/II27UA6Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18429}
}
abstract

This contribution provides a partial response to the titular statement since, it will be claimed,the ``why'' is not yet understood, but there is a pathway for achieving a more complete understanding. The sense of the community has been that, given a prospective metal hydride and pressure, the energy landscape can be surveyed computationally for thermodynamic and dynamic stability, the Eliashberg spectral function with its required input (energy bands, phonon modes, coupling matrix elements) can be calculated, and the critical temperature T$_c$ obtained. Satisfyingly large values of the electron-phonon coupling strength $\lambda$=2-3 at high mean frequency are obtained, giving very reasonable agreement with existing high T$_c$ hydrides. Typically 80-85\% of $\lambda$ is attributable to high frequency H vibrations. This much was envisioned by Ashcroft two decades ago, so why should there be any angst? This paper addresses more specifically the question {\it why hydrogen?} Light mass is indeed a factor, but with possibilities not yet explored. This paper provides a concise overview of related formal developments occurring sporadically over several decades that, when implemented, could resolve the question of {\it why hydrogen, why so high T$_c$.} The dearth of success of numerous high throughput searches proposing higher T$_c$ materials, especially hydrides, is touched on briefly. Based on as yet unapplied developments in simplifying effects of atomic displacement, it is proposed that there is a straightforward path toward a deeper understanding of ``metallic hydrogen superconductivity" in conjunction with added computational efficiency, and that some human-learning should assist in focusing the search for higher T$_c$ superconductors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, and I. A. Troyan, Conventional superconductivity at 190 K at high pressures, arXiv:1412.0460 (2014)

    arXiv 2014

  2. [2]

    A. P. Drozdov, M. I. Eremets, I. A. Troyan, V. Ksenofontov, S. I. Shylin, Conventional superconductivity at 203 kelvin at high pressures in the sulfur hydride system, Nature 525 , 73 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    Einaga, M

    M. Einaga, M. Sakata, T. Ishikawa, K. Shimizu, M. I. Eremets, A. P. Drozdov, I. A. Troyan, N. Hirao, Y. Ohishi, Crystal structure of the superconducting phase of sulfur hydride. Nature Physics 12 , 835 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    D. Duan, Y. Liu, F. Tian, D. Li, X. Huang, Z. Zhao, H. Yu, B. Liu, W. Tian, and T. Cui, Pressure-induced metalization of dense (H _2 S) _2 H _2 with high-T _c superconductivity. Sci. Rep. 4 , 6968 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    Y. Li, J. Hao, H. Liu, Y. Li, Y. Ma, The metalization and superconductivity of dense hydrogen sulfide. J. Chem. Phys. 140 , 174712 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    D. A. Papaconstantopoulos, B. M. Klein, M. J. Mehl, W. E. Pickett. Cubic H _3 S around 200 GPa: an atomic hydrogen superconductor stabilized by sulfur, Phys. Rev. B 91 , 184511 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Errea, M

    I. Errea, M. Calandra, C. J. Pickard, J. Nelson, R. J. Needs, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, F. Mauri, High-pressure hydrogen sulfide from first principles: a strongly anharmonic phonon-mediated superconductor. Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 , 157004, (2015)

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Bernstein, C

    N. Bernstein, C. S. Hellberg, M. D. Johannes, I. I. Mazin, and M. J. Mehl, What superconducts in sulfur hydrides under pressure and why. Phys. Rev. B 91 , 060511(R) (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Akashi, M

    R. Akashi, M. Kawamura, S. Tsuneyuki, Y. Nomura, R. Arita, First-principles study of the pressure and crystal-structure dependences of the superconducting transition temperature in compressed sulfur hydrides, Phys. Rev. B 91 , 224513 (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    J. A. Flores-Livas, A. Sanna, E. K. U. Gross, High temperature superconductivity in sulfur and selenium hydrides at high pressure. Eur. Phys. J. B 89 , 63 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Quan and W

    Y. Quan and W. E. Pickett, van Hove singularities and spectral smearing in high temperature superconducting H _3 S, Phys. Rev. B 93 , 104526 (2016)

    2016

  4. [12]

    Errea, M

    I. Errea, M. Calandra, C. J. Pickard, J. R. Nelson, R. J. Needs, Y. Li, H. Liu, Y. Zhang, Y. Ma, F. Mauri, Quantum hydrogen bond symmetrization in the superconducting hydrogen sulfide system. Nature 533 , 81 (2016)

    2016

  5. [13]

    H. Liu, I. I. Naumov, R. Hoffmann, N. W. Ashcroft, R. J. Hemley, Potential high-Tc superconducting lanthanum and yttrium hydrides at high pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 114 , 6990 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    A. P. Drozdov, V. S. Minkov, S. P. Besedin, P. P. Kong, M. A. Kuzovnikov, D. A. Knyazev, and M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity at 215 K in lanthanum hydride at high pressures, arXiv:1808.07039

    arXiv

  7. [15]

    A. P. Drozdov, P. P. Kong, V. S. Minkov, S. P. Besedin, M. A. Kuzovnikov, S. Mozaffari, L. Balicas, F. Balakirev, D. Graf, V. P. Prakapenka, E. Greenberg, D. A. Knyazev, M. Tkacz, and M. I. Eremets, Superconductivity at 250 K in lanthanum hydride under high pressures, arXiv:1812.01561

    arXiv

  8. [16]

    Somayazulu, M

    M. Somayazulu, M. Ahart, A. K Mishra, Z. M. Geballe, M. Baldini, Y. Meng, V. V. Struzhkin, R. J. Hemley, Evidence for superconductivity above 260 K in lanthanum superhydride at megabar pressures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 , 027001 (2019)

    2019

  9. [17]

    Peng et al

    F. Peng et al. , Hydrogen clathrate structures in rare earth hydrides at high pressures: possible route to room-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 , 107001 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    Kong et al

    P. Kong et al. , Superconductivity up to 243K in the yttrium-hydrogen system under high pressure, Nat. Comm. 12 , 5075 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Snider et al

    E. Snider et al. , Synthesis of yttrium superhydride superconductor with a transition temperature up to 262 K by catalytic hydrogenation at high pressures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 , 117003 (2021)

    2021

  12. [20]

    W. E. Pickett, Colloquium: Room Temperature Superconductivity: the Roles of Theory and Materials Design, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95 , 021001 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    W. L. McMillan, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 167 , 331 (1968)

    1968

  14. [22]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 , 019901 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    D. Duan, Y. Liu, Y. Ma, Z. Shao, B. Liu, T. Cui,

  16. [24]

    M. A. Ball, General theory of the effect of ionic motion on charge density, J. Phys. C 8 , 3328 (1975)

    1975

  17. [25]

    M. A. Ball, The effect of a phonon on the charge density of a crystal, J. Phys. C 10 , 4921 (1977)

    1977

  18. [26]

    Kunstmann, L

    J. Kunstmann, L. Boeri, and W. E. Pickett, Linear response separation of a solid into atomic constituents: Li, Al, and their evolution under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 75 , 075107 (2007)

    2007

  19. [27]

    I. J. Onuorah, P. Bonf, R. De Renzi, L. Monacelli, F. Mauri, M. Calandra, and I. Errea, Quantum effects in muon spin spectroscopy within the stochastic selfconsistent harmonic approximation, Phys. Rev. Mater. 3 , 073804 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    W. E. Pickett, The generalized pseudoatom potential in solids: relation to screening and lattice dynamics, J. Phys. C 12 , 1479 (1979)

    1979

  21. [29]

    Gaspari and B

    G. Gaspari and B. L. Gy\"orffy, Electron-phonon interactions, d resonances, and superconductivity in transition metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 , 801 (1972)

    1972

  22. [30]

    Y. Quan, S. S. Ghosh, and W. E. Pickett, Compressed Hydrides as Metallic Hydrogen Superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 100 , 184505 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    N. W. Ashcroft, Metallic Hydrogen: A High-Temperature Superconductor? Phys. Rev. Lett. 21 , 1748 (1968)

    1968

  24. [32]

    N. W. Ashcroft, Hydrogen Dominant Metallic Alloys: High Temperature Superconductors? Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 , 187002 (2004)

    2004

  25. [33]

    S. S. Ghosh, Y. Quan, and W. E. Pickett, Strong Particle-Hole Asymmetry in a 200 kelvin Superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 100 , 094521 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    Ponc\'e, E.R

    S. Ponc\'e, E.R. Margine, C. Verdi, F. Giustino, EPW: Electron-phonon coupling, transport and superconducting properties using maximally localized Wannier functions. Comp. Phys. Comm. 209 , 116 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Touriniemi, K

    J. Touriniemi, K. Juntunen-Nurmilaukas, J. Uusvuori,

  28. [36]

    Touriniemi, K

    J. Touriniemi, K. Juntunen-Nurmilaukas, J. Uusvuori, E. Pentti, A. Salmela, and A. Sebedash, Superconductivity in lithium below 0.4 millikelvin at ambient pressure, Nature 447 , 187 (2007)

    2007

  29. [37]

    Shimizu, H

    K. Shimizu, H. Ishikawa, D. Takao, T. Yagi, and I. Amaya, Superconductivity in compressed lithium at 20K, Nature (London) 419 , 597 (2002)

    2002

  30. [38]

    Shimizu, H

    K. Shimizu, H. Ishikawa, D. Takao, T. Yagi, and I. Amaya

  31. [39]

    Struzhkin, M

    V.V. Struzhkin, M. I. Eremets, W. Gan, H.-K. Mao, and R. J. Hemley, Superconductivity in Dense Lithium, Science 298 , 1213 (2002)

    2002

  32. [40]

    Deemyad and J

    S. Deemyad and J. S. Schilling, Superconducting Phase Diagram of Li Metal in Nearly Hydrostatic Pressures up to 67 GPa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 , 167001 (2003)

    2003

  33. [41]

    Kasinathan, J

    D. Kasinathan, J. Kune s, A. Lazicki, H. Rosner, C. S. Yoo, R. T. Scalettar, and W. E. Pickett, Superconductivity and Lattice Instability in Compressed Lithium from Fermi Surface Hot Spots, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 , 047004 (2006)

    2006

  34. [42]

    Kasinathan, K

    D. Kasinathan, K. Koepernik, J. Kune s, H. Rosner, and W. E. Pickett, Origin of strong coupling in lithium under pressure, Physica C 460-462 , 133 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    Gilat and L

    G. Gilat and L. J. Raubenheimer, Accurate numerical method for calculating frequency-distribution functions in solids, Phys. Rev. 144 , 390 (1966)

    1966

  36. [44]

    W. E. Pickett and P. B. Allen, Optical properties of Nb and Mo calculated from augmented-plane-wave band structures, Phys. Rev. B 11 , 3599 (1975)

    1975

  37. [45]

    W. E. Pickett, TCM Group Report No. 8, TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, U.K. 1974 (unpublished). The linear tetrahedron integration method was extended to evaluate the integral of the double -function expression ( _k) ( _ k+q around the line of intersection of the F...

    1974

  38. [46]

    Kunstmann, Density Functional and Linear Response Studies of sp Materials, PhD thesis, Max Planck Institute, Stuttgart, 2008 (unpublished)

    J. Kunstmann, Density Functional and Linear Response Studies of sp Materials, PhD thesis, Max Planck Institute, Stuttgart, 2008 (unpublished)

    2008

  39. [47]

    C. R. Leavens and J. P. Carbotte, An important parameter in high-temperature superconductivity. J. Low Temp. Phys. 14 , 195 (1974)

    1974

  40. [48]

    C. R. Leavens, Important parameters in strong-coupling superconductivity, J. Phys. F 7 , 1911 (1977)

    1911

  41. [49]

    P. B. Allen and R. C. Dynes, Transition temperature of strong-coupled superconductors reanalyzed. Phys. Rev. B 12 , 905 (1975)

    1975

  42. [50]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first principles

  43. [51]

    Giannozzi et al

    P. Giannozzi et al. , comment O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. Buongiorno Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. Dal Corso, S. de. Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. DiStasio Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G...

    2017

  44. [52]

    Bergmann and D

    G. Bergmann and D. Rainer, The sensitivity of the transition temperature to changes in ^2F( ) . Z. f. Physik 263 , 59 (1973)

    1973

  45. [53]

    J. A. Camargo-Mart\'inez, G. I. Gonz\'alez-Pedreros, and F. Mesa, The higher superconducting transition temperature T _c and the functional derivative of T _c with ^2F( ) for electron-phonon superconductors, J. Phys:CM 32 , 505901 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    F. S. Khan and P. B. Allen, Deformation potentials and electron-phonon scattering: Two new theorems, Phys. Rev B 29 , 3341 (1984)

    1984

  47. [55]

    Warren Pickett and Mikhail Eremets, The quest for room-temperature superconductivity in hydrides, Physics Today 72 , 52 (2019); doi: 10.1063/PT.3.4204

    2019 doi

  48. [56]

    Savrasov, Linear-response theory and lattice dynamics: A muffin-tin-orbital approach, Phys

    S.Y. Savrasov, Linear-response theory and lattice dynamics: A muffin-tin-orbital approach, Phys. Rev. B 54 , 16470 (1996)

    1996

  49. [57]

    Savrasov and D.Y

    S.Y. Savrasov and D.Y. Savrasov, Electron-phonon interactions and related physical properties of metals from linear-response theory, Phys. Rev. B 54 , 16487 (1996)

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.