Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 65 references

Designing across domains with declarative thinking: Insights from the 96-Eyes ptychographic imager project

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A practitioner's report from the 96-Eyes project argues that stating an imager's requirements as declarative, machine-readable problem statements preserves cross-domain input, improves traceability, and reduces misalignment among optics, co

desk verdict Abstract is a reasonable 5GL case-study pitch, but the full text is an unrelated PHANGS-MUSE paper—there is no reviewable manuscript. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.18512 v2 pith:LUNXKUH4 submitted 2025-08-25 physics.optics cs.CL

classification physics.opticscs.CL
keywords declarativeprogrammingfifth-generationlanguage5GLptychographicimagingmulti-modalimagerdesigntraceabilityinterdisciplinaryR&Dhigh-throughputdrugdiscovery
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that specifying an imaging instrument's goals as declarative, machine-readable problem statements, rather than as step-by-step imperative code, preserves the input of every stakeholder group in a large interdisciplinary project. Using the 96-Eyes project—a 96-camera parallel multi-modal imager for high-throughput drug discovery—as a representative case, the author claims this approach improves transparency, keeps design decisions traceable, and reduces costly misalignment among optics, algorithms, hardware-accelerated compute, and life-sciences teams. The paper is a practitioner's reflection: it offers real 5GL code examples and discusses why imperative, third-generation languages remain the default for inter-team collaboration, and why that default can shape research workflows in ways teams may not notice. A sympathetic reader would care because design errors in such instruments are expensive to fix late, and a shared declarative spec could act as a living contract across domains.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 5GL problem statement: a declarative, machine-readable specification that states what the system must achieve (goals and constraints) rather than how to compute it step by step. It does the work of a shared contract among optical, algorithmic, hardware-compute, and life-science teams: because the statement is checkable and traceable, requirements can be validated, linked to design decisions, and made visible to every group, making misalignment detectable early.

What would settle it

Run two comparable instrument-design efforts—one with a declarative 5GL requirement specification and one with conventional imperative/3GL requirement documents—and compare the frequency and cost of cross-team design changes; if the declarative team shows no reduction in misalignment or rework, the claim fails. A second, independent check: attempt to encode a known tacit constraint, such as a biologist's intuition about assay robustness, as a 5GL problem statement; if the constraint cannot be expressed or is systematically distorted, the preservation claim collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central claim is that a fifth-generation declarative language can serve as the medium for expressing the full requirement set of a de novo imaging system—optics constraints, algorithmic choices, compute budgets, and life-science objectives—so the resulting problem statement is machine-readable and checkable. The author's evidence is the 96-Eyes imager: 96 cameras in parallel, multi-modal, built for high-throughput drug discovery, where requirements from different domains must meet in a single design. The claimed payoff is that each design decision can be traced back to a stakeholder requirement, that no domain's input is silently dropped, and that misalignment i

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that mission-critical knowledge from optics, compute, and biology teams can be written down as declarative, machine-readable problem statements without losing what matters, and that the 96-Eyes project is a typical rather than unusually favorable case.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An instrument's requirements can be versioned and diffed like code, so any change in a life-science goal or a hardware constraint becomes immediately visible to all teams.
  • Design traceability becomes practical: every optical or algorithmic choice can be linked back to a formal requirement, which helps audits, handoffs, and post-mortems.
  • Concurrent R&D workflows become safer, because teams no longer need to wait for a fully sequential, phase-driven handoff to integrate their constraints.
  • The main adoption barrier is not technical but organizational: imperative, 3GL-based habits and existing domain hierarchies must shift for 5GL problem statements to take hold.
  • The declarative approach is framed as especially promising where concurrent R&D workflows are already common, not where sequential phase-driven workflows remain the norm.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, if the requirement-encoding claim generalizes, the same 5GL-style problem statement could serve as a machine-checkable design contract for other large multi-domain instruments, such as synchrotron beamlines or clinical imaging systems.
  • A direct test would be a matched comparison: two comparable imaging projects, one using declarative problem statements and one using conventional requirements documents, measuring the number and cost of late requirement changes. That would separate the claimed benefit from the effect of simply paying more attention to requirements.
  • The paper's observation that programming paradigms shape workflows implies a deeper corollary: the choice of specification language is also an organizational power structure, since the group whose notation becomes canonical gains influence over what counts as a requirement.
  • The failure mode implicit in the abstract—tacit knowledge that resists formalization—could be probed by asking domain experts to encode their own requirements and then checking whether the encoded statements capture the decisions they actually make under uncertainty.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The submission consists of an abstract claiming a practitioner's reflection on applying declarative, 5th-generation problem-formulation language (5GL) to de novo imaging system design, using the '96-Eyes' 96-camera ptychographic imager as a representative case. The abstract promises real-world code examples, a case study spanning hardware, algorithms, and life-sciences requirements, and lessons on adopting 5GL in environments dominated by imperative 3GL languages. However, the supplied full text is a completely different paper: 'Physical properties of gas departing from circular rotation at 50 pc scales using the PHANGS-MUSE galaxies' (arXiv:2508.18517v1). The full text contains no mention of 96-Eyes, ptychography, 5GL, declarative programming, or instrument design. Consequently, the manuscript as submitted provides no evidence for, or even a trace of, the central claims made in the abstract.

Significance. If substantiated, the claimed methodology would be genuinely useful: formalizing cross-disciplinary instrument requirements into machine-readable problem statements could improve traceability and reduce costly misalignment in complex projects. However, the submitted document offers no extractable evidence. There is no requirements-to-5GL mapping, no code examples, no outcome metrics, no baseline comparison, and no description of the 96-Eyes project. The full text is an unrelated astrophysics paper. The significance of the claimed contribution is therefore unassessable from the available material. The submission does not provide the minimal artifacts (case-study description, encoding examples, or any evaluation) that would make the central claim checkable.

major comments (2)
  1. [Full Text (entire manuscript)] The full text is arXiv:2508.18517v1, a PHANGS-MUSE galaxy kinematics paper. It never mentions 96-Eyes, ptychography, 5GL, declarative programming, or imaging system design. None of the concrete elements promised in the abstract—'real-world code examples,' the 96-Eyes case study, or the 3GL/5GL adoption lessons—appear anywhere. This is not a missing detail or an incomplete section; it is an absent document. There is no manuscript content to review for the stated claims.
  2. [Abstract] Even if the full-text mismatch were a submission error, the abstract's causal claims ('enhances transparency, ensures design traceability, and minimizes costly misalignment') are unsupported. No definition or metric for 'transparency,' 'traceability,' or 'misalignment' is given, and no baseline is provided. To support the load-bearing premise that 96-Eyes is a representative case, the paper would need at least a mapping of project requirements to 5GL statements, examples of preserved mission-critical knowledge, and some outcome measure; all are absent.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Header/Author block] The manuscript is labeled 'Draft version August 27, 2025' and 'Typeset using AASTeX631,' and the full text lists a different corresponding author (C. López-Cobá) than the abstract's first-person author. This is inconsistent with the abstract and reinforces that the wrong file was submitted.
  2. [Abstract] Language issues: 'an one-size-fits-all solution' should be 'a one-size-fits-all solution'; 'how programming paradigms implicitly shapes' should be 'how programming paradigms implicitly shape.' These are minor relative to the content mismatch.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the paper contains no derivation chain to reduce; its conclusions are self-reported reflections rather than predictions derived from inputs.

full rationale

The manuscript is a practitioner's reflection arguing from personal experience with the 96-Eyes project. There is no formal derivation, no fitted parameter, no equation, and no prediction that is constructed from its own inputs. The abstract asserts that declarative 5GL formulation 'enhances transparency, ensures design traceability, and minimizes costly misalignment,' but this is an inductive recommendation from a case study, not a mathematically derived result. The supplied full text is an unrelated PHANGS-MUSE galaxy-kinematics paper, so the promised 96-Eyes content is entirely absent; consequently there is no derivation chain to walk and no specific reduction to exhibit. Under the rule that circularity must be demonstrated by quoting a concrete step where a claimed output equals an input by construction, no such step exists. Missing evidence and self-report are genuine weaknesses, but they concern evidentiary support, not circular reasoning. Therefore the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The claims rest on two assumptions: that requirements can be faithfully encoded in 5GL and that the 96-Eyes project is a representative case. No free parameters or invented entities are present. The paper's evidence, as seen in the abstract, is self-reported experience.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Requirements of the 96-Eyes instrument can be faithfully represented in machine-readable 5GL problem statements without losing mission-critical intent.
    The abstract states this as the premise for the claimed benefits (transparency, traceability, misalignment reduction); it is not demonstrated with external comparisons.
  • ad hoc to paper The 96-Eyes project is a representative case for de novo imaging system design across academia and private sector.
    Used as the sole evidence base in the abstract; no external case or baseline is referenced.
  • domain assumption Programming language paradigms shape research workflows and team hierarchies.
    The discussion relies on this claim to explain adoption barriers; no empirical support is cited in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Designing across domains with declarative thinking: Insights from the 96-Eyes ptychographic imager project." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LUNXKUH4

@misc{pith2026250818512,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Designing across domains with declarative thinking: Insights from the 96-Eyes ptychographic imager project},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LUNXKUH4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.18512}
}
read the original abstract

This article presents a practitioner's reflection on applying declarative, 5th generation, problem formulation language (5GL) to de novo imaging system design, informed by experiences across the interdisciplinary research in academia and cross-functional product development within the private sector. Using the 96-Eyes project: 96-camera parallel multi-modal imager for high-throughput drug discovery as a representative case, I illustrate how project requirements, ranging from hardware constraints to life sciences needs, can be formalized into machine-readable problem statements to preserve mission-critical input from diverse domain stakeholders. This declarative approach enhances transparency, ensures design traceability, and minimizes costly misalignment across optical, algorithmic, hardware-accelerated compute, and life sciences teams. Alongside the technical discussion of 5GL with real-world code examples, I reflect on the practical barriers to adopting 5GL in environments where imperative, 3rd-generation languages (3GL) remain the default medium for inter-team collaboration. Rather than offering an one-size-fits-all solution, these learned lessons highlight how programming paradigms implicitly shapes research workflows through existing domain hierarchies. The discussion aims to invite further explorations into how declarative problem formulations can facilitate innovation in settings where concurrent R\&{}D workflows are gaining traction, as opposed to environments where sequential, phase-driven workflows remain the norm.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author Grady, J. O. title Universal architecture description framework . journal Systems Engineering volume 12 , pages 91--116 , doi:10.1002/sys.20112 ( year 2008 )

  2. [2]

    author Kedia, S. B. , author Baker, J. C. , author Carbonell, R. G. , author Lee, K. H. , author Roberts, C. J. , author Erickson, J. , author Schiel, J. E. , author Rogers, K. , author Schaefer, G. & author Pluschkell, S. title Biomanufacturing readiness levels [brl]—a shared vocabulary for biopharmaceutical technology development and commercialization ....

  3. [3]

    title Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law

    author Newman, M. title Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf’s law . journal Contemporary Physics volume 46 , pages 323--351 , doi:10.1080/00107510500052444 ( year 2005 )

  4. [4]

    author Chan, A. C. S. , author Kim, J. , author Pan, A. , author Xu, H. , author Nojima, D. , author Hale, C. , author Wang, S. & author Yang, C. title Parallel fourier ptychographic microscopy for high-throughput screening with 96 cameras (96 eyes) . journal Scientific Reports volume 9 , doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47146-z ( year 2019 )

  5. [5]

    , author Horstmeyer, R

    author Zheng, G. , author Horstmeyer, R. & author Yang, C. title Wide-field, high-resolution fourier ptychographic microscopy . journal Nature Photonics volume 7 , pages 739--745 , doi:10.1038/nphoton.2013.187 ( year 2013 )

  6. [6]

    , author Henley, B

    author Kim, J. , author Henley, B. M. , author Kim, C. H. , author Lester, H. A. & author Yang, C. title Incubator embedded cell culture imaging system (emsight) based on fourier ptychographic microscopy . journal Biomedical Optics Express volume 7 , pages 3097 , doi:10.1364/boe.7.003097 ( year 2016 )

  7. [7]

    , author Liu, Z

    author Tian, L. , author Liu, Z. , author Yeh, L.-H. , author Chen, M. , author Zhong, J. & author Waller, L. title Computational illumination for high-speed in vitro fourier ptychographic microscopy . journal Optica volume 2 , pages 904 , doi:10.1364/optica.2.000904 ( year 2015 )

  8. [8]

    , author Zheng, G

    author Ou, X. , author Zheng, G. & author Yang, C. title Embedded pupil function recovery for fourier ptychographic microscopy . journal Optics Express volume 22 , pages 4960 , doi:10.1364/oe.22.004960 ( year 2014 )

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    author Chan, A. C. title MBSE -lite: System requirement tracking and design synthesis with a simplified schema. type Tech. Rep. ( year 2020 ). ://github.com/antonysigma/mbse-lite. note Work derived from Kass2016

  2. [10]

    & author Kolozs, J

    author Kass, N. & author Kolozs, J. title Getting started with MBSE in product development . journal INCOSE International Symposium volume 26 , pages 526--541 , doi:10.1002/j.2334-5837.2016.00176.x ( year 2016 )

  3. [11]

    , author Diamond, S

    author Heide, F. , author Diamond, S. , author Nießner, M. , author Ragan-Kelley, J. , author Heidrich, W. & author Wetzstein, G. title Proximal: efficient image optimization using proximal algorithms . journal ACM Transactions on Graphics volume 35 , pages 1--15 , doi:10.1145...

  4. [12]

    , author Adams, A

    author Ragan-Kelley, J. , author Adams, A. , author Paris, S. , author Levoy, M. , author Amarasinghe, S. & author Durand, F. title Decoupling algorithms from schedules for easy optimization of image processing pipelines . journal ACM Transactions on Graphics volume 31 , pages...

  5. [13]

    title Domain-specific languages ( publisher Addison-Wesley , address Upper Saddle River, N.J

    author Fowler, M. title Domain-specific languages ( publisher Addison-Wesley , address Upper Saddle River, N.J. , year 2011 )

  6. [14]

    , author Lin, D.-L

    author Huang, T.-W. , author Lin, D.-L. , author Lin, C.-X. & author Lin, Y. title Taskflow: A lightweight parallel and heterogeneous task graph computing system . journal IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems volume 33 , pages 1303--1320 , doi:10.1109/tpds.202...

  7. [15]

    , author Malpica, N

    author Machado, F. , author Malpica, N. & author Borromeo, S. title Parametric cad modeling for open source scientific hardware: Comparing openscad and freecad python scripts . journal PLOS ONE volume 14 , pages e0225795 , doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0225795 ( year 2019 )

  8. [16]

    title Standard commands for programmable instruments (SCPI): syntax and style

    author Bode, F. title Standard commands for programmable instruments (SCPI): syntax and style. organization SCPI Consortium ( year 1999 ). ://www.ivifoundation.org/downloads/SCPI/scpi-99.pdf

  9. [17]

    & author Adve, V

    author Lattner, C. & author Adve, V. title Llvm: A compilation framework for lifelong program analysis & transformation . In booktitle International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization, 2004. CGO 2004. , pages 75--86 , doi:10.1109/cgo.2004.1281665 ( publisher IEEE )

  10. [18]

    author Lions, P. L. & author Mercier, B. title Splitting algorithms for the sum of two nonlinear operators . journal SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis volume 16 , pages 964--979 , doi:10.1137/0716071 ( year 1979 )

  11. [19]

    , author McElvain, M

    author Xu, H. , author McElvain, M. , author Fiorino, M. , author Henkle, B. , author Sherman, L. , author Xu, Y. , author Tominey, E. , author Kelley, K. , author Adlam, M. , author Bürli, R. , author Siu, J. , author Wong, M. & author Cee, V. J. title Predictability of perip...

  12. [20]

    , author Zhang, S

    author Zheng, C. , author Zhang, S. , author Liu, S. , author Yang, D. & author Hao, Q. title Single-shot fourier ptychographic microscopy with isotropic lateral resolution via polarization-multiplexed led illumination . journal Biomedical Optics Express volume 15 , pages 672 ...

  13. [21]

    , author Martinez-Carranza, J

    author Rogalski, M. , author Martinez-Carranza, J. , author Górski, B. , author Arcab, P. , author Jóźwik, M. , author Zdańkowski, P. , author Sobień, M. , author Stefaniuk, M. , author Zhou, S. , author Zuo, C. & author Trusiak, M. title Fourier ptychographic microscopy aided...

  14. [22]

    , author McDermott, T

    author Henderson, K. , author McDermott, T. & author Salado, A. title MBSE adoption experiences in organizations: Lessons learned . journal Systems Engineering volume 27 , pages 214--239 , doi:10.1002/sys.21717 ( year 2023 )

  15. [23]

    & author Mullainathan, S

    author Obermeyer, Z. & author Mullainathan, S. title To solve a tough problem, reframe it . journal Harvard Business Review ( year 2024 ). ://hbr.org/2024/01/to-solve-a-tough-problem-reframe-it. note Accessed: 2025-05-14

  16. [24]

    author Codd, E. F. title A relational model of data for large shared data banks . journal Communications of the ACM volume 13 , pages 377--387 , doi:10.1145/362384.362685 ( year 1970 )

  17. [25]

    & author Boyd, S

    author Mattingley, J. & author Boyd, S. title Cvxgen: a code generator for embedded convex optimization . journal Optimization and Engineering volume 13 , pages 1--27 , doi:10.1007/s11081-011-9176-9 ( year 2011 )

  18. [26]

    title Autonomous precision landing of space rockets

    author Blackmore, L. title Autonomous precision landing of space rockets . journal National Academy of Engineering -- The Bridge on Frontiers of Engineering volume 4 , pages 15--20 ( year 2016 ). ://www.larsblackmore.com/nae_bridge_2016.pdf

  19. [27]

    , author Amini, M

    author Johnson, T. , author Amini, M. & author Li, X. D. title Thinlto: scalable and incremental lto . In booktitle Proceedings of the 2017 International Symposium on Code Generation and Optimization , CGO '17, pages 111–121 ( publisher IEEE Press , address Austin, USA , year 2017 )

  20. [28]

    author Mullapudi, R. T. , author Adams, A. , author Sharlet, D. , author Ragan-Kelley, J. & author Fatahalian, K. title Automatically scheduling Halide image processing pipelines . journal ACM Transactions on Graphics volume 35 , pages 1--11 , doi:10.1145/2897824.2925952 ( year 2016 )

  21. [29]

    , author Ray, J

    author Baghdadi, R. , author Ray, J. , author Romdhane, M. B. , author Del Sozzo, E. , author Akkas, A. , author Zhang, Y. , author Suriana, P. , author Kamil, S. & author Amarasinghe, S. title Tiramisu: A polyhedral compiler for expressing fast and portable code , doi:10.4855...

  22. [30]

    , author Brunhaver, J

    author Hegarty, J. , author Brunhaver, J. , author DeVito, Z. , author Ragan-Kelley, J. , author Cohen, N. , author Bell, S. , author Vasilyev, A. , author Horowitz, M. & author Hanrahan, P. title Darkroom: compiling high-level image processing code into hardware pipelines . j...

  23. [31]

    title Programmatic control of a compiler for generating high-performance spatial hardware

    author Rong, H. title Programmatic control of a compiler for generating high-performance spatial hardware . journal CoRR volume abs/1711.07606 ( year 2017 ). ://arxiv.org/abs/1711.07606. note Open source available at https://github.com/IntelLabs/t2sp

  24. [32]

    , author Chi, Y

    author Li, J. , author Chi, Y. & author Cong, J. title HeteroHalide : From image processing DSL to efficient FPGA acceleration . In booktitle Proceedings of the 2020 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays , FPGA ’20, pages 51--57 , doi:10.1145/3373...

  25. [33]

    , author Zhang, J

    author Fu, A. , author Zhang, J. & author Boyd, S. title Anderson accelerated douglas--rachford splitting . journal SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing volume 42 , pages A3560--A3583 , doi:10.1137/19m1290097 ( year 2020 )

  26. [34]

    author Boyd, S. P. , author Parshakova, T. , author Ryu, E. K. & author Suh, J. J. title Optimization algorithm design via electric circuits . In booktitle The Thirty-eighth Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems ( year 2024 ). ://openreview.net/forum?id=9Jmt1eER9P

  27. [35]

    , author Xu, S

    author Sun, Y. , author Xu, S. , author Li, Y. , author Tian, L. , author Wohlberg, B. & author Kamilov, U. S. title Regularized fourier ptychography using an online plug-and-play algorithm . In booktitle ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech an...

  28. [36]

    , author Steinberger, M

    author Heide, F. , author Steinberger, M. , author Tsai, Y.-T. , author Rouf, M. , author PajÄ…k, D. , author Reddy, D. , author Gallo, O. , author abd Wolfgang Heidrich, J. L. , author Egiazarian, K. , author Kautz, J. & author Pulli, K. title FlexISP : A flexible camera imag...

  29. [37]

    , author Wu, Z

    author Sun, Y. , author Wu, Z. , author Xu, X. , author Wohlberg, B. & author Kamilov, U. S. title Scalable plug-and-play admm with convergence guarantees doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2006.03224 ( year 2020 )

  30. [38]

    , author Jiang, W

    author Zhang, Y. , author Jiang, W. , author Tian, L. , author Waller, L. & author Dai, Q. title Self-learning based fourier ptychographic microscopy . journal Optics Express volume 23 , pages 18471 , doi:10.1364/oe.23.018471 ( year 2015 )

  31. [39]

    , author Wu, Y

    author Chen, N. , author Wu, Y. , author Tan, C. , author Cao, L. , author Wang, J. & author Lam, E. Y. title Uncertainty-aware Fourier ptychography . journal Light: Science & Applications volume 14 , doi:10.1038/s41377-025-01915-w ( year 2025 )

  32. [40]

    , author Wei, K

    author Lai, Z. , author Wei, K. , author Fu, Y. , author H \"a rtel, P. & author Heide, F. title -prox: Differentiable proximal algorithm modeling for large-scale optimization . journal ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) volume 42 , pages 1--19 ( year 2023 )

  33. [41]

    author of Health, N. I. title U01 cooperative agreements ( year 2025 ). ://grants.nih.gov/funding/activity-codes/u01. note Accessed: 2025-08-13

  34. [42]

    author of Health, N. I. title Research project ( R01 ) ( year 2024 ). ://grants.nih.gov/funding/activity-codes/R01. note Accessed: 2025-08-13

  35. [43]

    author Gibbs, H. C. , author Mota, S. M. , author Hart, N. A. , author Min, S. W. , author Vernino, A. O. , author Pritchard, A. L. , author Sen, A. , author Vitha, S. , author Sarasamma, S. , author McIntosh, A. L. , author Yeh, A. T. , author Lekven, A. C. , author McCreedy,...

  36. [44]

    , author Wu, J

    author Yaqoob, Z. , author Wu, J. & author Yang, C. title Spectral domain optical coherence tomography: a better oct imaging strategy . journal BioTechniques volume 39 , doi:10.2144/000112090 ( year 2005 )

  37. [45]

    author Solli, D. R. , author Chou, J. & author Jalali, B. title Amplified wavelength–time transformation for real-time spectroscopy . journal Nature Photonics volume 2 , pages 48--51 , doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.253 ( year 2007 )

  38. [46]

    , author Rivenson, Y

    author Lin, X. , author Rivenson, Y. , author Yardimci, N. T. , author Veli, M. , author Luo, Y. , author Jarrahi, M. & author Ozcan, A. title All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks . journal Science volume 361 , pages 1004--1008 , doi:10.1126/scie...

  39. [47]

    , author Peng, Y

    author Wang, Z. , author Peng, Y. , author Fang, L. & author Gao, L. title Computational optical imaging: on the convergence of physical and digital layers . journal Optica volume 12 , pages 113 , doi:10.1364/optica.544943 ( year 2025 )

  40. [48]

    , author Brady, D

    author Chen, N. , author Brady, D. J. & author Lam, E. Y. title Differentiable imaging: Progress, challenges, and outlook . journal Advanced Devices & Instrumentation volume 6 , doi:10.34133/adi.0117 ( year 2025 )

  41. [49]

    , author Allen, W

    author Wang, X. , author Allen, W. E. , author Wright, M. A. , author Sylwestrak, E. L. , author Samusik, N. , author Vesuna, S. , author Evans, K. , author Liu, C. , author Ramakrishnan, C. , author Liu, J. , author Nolan, G. P. , author Bava, F.-A. & author Deisseroth, K. ti...

  42. [50]

    author Reed, B. D. et al. title Real-time dynamic single-molecule protein sequencing on an integrated semiconductor device . journal Science volume 378 , pages 186--192 , doi:10.1126/science.abo7651 ( year 2022 )

  43. [51]

    author Arslan, S. et al. title Sequencing by avidity enables high accuracy with low reagent consumption . journal Nature Biotechnology volume 42 , pages 132--138 , doi:10.1038/s41587-023-01750-7 ( year 2023 )

  44. [52]

    author Altschul, S. F. , author Gish, W. , author Miller, W. , author Myers, E. W. & author Lipman, D. J. title Basic local alignment search tool . journal Journal of Molecular Biology volume 215 , pages 403--410 , doi:10.1016/s0022-2836(05)80360-2 ( year 1990 )

  45. [53]

    , author Chang, P.-C

    author Poplin, R. , author Chang, P.-C. , author Alexander, D. , author Schwartz, S. , author Colthurst, T. , author Ku, A. , author Newburger, D. , author Dijamco, J. , author Nguyen, N. , author Afshar, P. T. , author Gross, S. S. , author Dorfman, L. , author McLean, C. Y. ...

  46. [54]

    author Franke, K. R. & author Crowgey, E. L. title Accelerating next generation sequencing data analysis: an evaluation of optimized best practices for genome analysis toolkit algorithms . journal Genomics & Informatics volume 18 , pages e10 , doi:10.5808/gi.2020.18.1.e10 ( ye...

  47. [55]

    , author Allan, C

    author Moore, J. , author Allan, C. , author Besson, S. , author Burel, J.-M. , author Diel, E. , author Gault, D. , author Kozlowski, K. , author Lindner, D. , author Linkert, M. , author Manz, T. , author Moore, W. , author Pape, C. , author Tischer, C. & author Swedlow, J. ...

  48. [56]

    & author Langlois, R

    author Evans, G. & author Langlois, R. title Overcoming the diffraction limit with super-resolution optics to increase sequencing cluster density . type Tech. Rep. , institution Illumina ( year 2022 ). ://www.illumina.com/science/genomics-research/articles/overcoming-the-diffr...

  49. [57]

    , author Yang, Y

    author Huang, M. , author Yang, Y. , author Wen, X. , author Xu, W. , author Lu, N. , author Sun, X. , author Tu, J. & author Lu, Z. title Inferring single cell expression profiles from overlapped pooling sequencing data with compressed sensing strategy . journal Nucleic Acids...

  50. [58]

    , author Simonton, B

    author Cleary, B. , author Simonton, B. , author Bezney, J. , author Murray, E. , author Alam, S. , author Sinha, A. , author Habibi, E. , author Marshall, J. , author Lander, E. S. , author Chen, F. & author Regev, A. title Compressed sensing for highly efficient imaging tran...

  51. [59]

    author Chin, C. D. , author Linder, V. & author Sia, S. K. title Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices . journal Lab on a Chip volume 12 , pages 2118 , doi:10.1039/c2lc21204h ( year 2012 )

  52. [60]

    title Illumina cmos chip and one-channelsbs chemistry

    author Illumina . title Illumina cmos chip and one-channelsbs chemistry . type Tech. Rep. ( year 2018 ). ://www.illumina.com/content/dam/illumina-marketing/documents/products/techspotlights/cmos-tech-note-770-2013-054.pdf

  53. [61]

    , author Giordano, F

    author Lu, H. , author Giordano, F. & author Ning, Z. title Oxford nanopore minion sequencing and genome assembly . journal Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics volume 14 , pages 265--279 , doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2016.05.004 ( year 2016 )

  54. [62]

    author Fuller, C. W. et al. title Molecular electronics sensors on a scalable semiconductor chip: A platform for single-molecule measurement of binding kinetics and enzyme activity . journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences volume 119 , doi:10.1073/pnas.21128121...

  55. [63]

    , author Gharbi, M

    author Li, T.-M. , author Gharbi, M. , author Adams, A. , author Durand, F. & author Ragan-Kelley, J. title Differentiable programming for image processing and deep learning in Halide . journal ACM Transactions on Graphics volume 37 , pages 1--13 , doi:10.1145/3197517.3201383 ...

  56. [64]

    & author Yin, W

    author Davis, D. & author Yin, W. title A three-operator splitting scheme and its optimization applications , doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1504.01032 ( year 2015 )

  57. [65]

    author Chan, A. C. title On the 96-well plate coverglass tilt and curvature suppression in 96-camera imaging system , doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2406.15621 ( year 2024 ). note (Preprint)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.