Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Topological Winding Numbers from Wavefront Dislocations in Local Electronic Density

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A wavefront dislocation in the local electronic density carries the winding number of a chiral topological state, readable directly from STM images.

desk verdict A clearly specified STM-image protocol for reading a chiral winding number from local density dislocations, demonstrated on a graphene vacancy and an adatom; the specific filter choices are new but the underlying formulas are inherited, and the robustness and scope claims outrun the evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19128 v2 pith:UQCWX2ZL submitted 2025-08-26 cond-mat.mes-hall

Yuval Abulafia , Eric Akkermans This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords topologicalwindingnumberwavefrontdislocationlocalelectronicdensityscanningtunnelingmicroscopychiralsymmetryindextheoremgraphenevacancyintervalleyinterference
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that for chiral-symmetric Hamiltonians, the integer topological invariant can be extracted from an STM-like image of the local electronic density rather than from edge-state transport or band-structure calculations. The load-bearing identity is Nzm=|Index D|=|ν|, which identifies the number of topological zero modes with both the analytic index of the off-diagonal block D and the bulk winding number. The paper shows that, for a graphene vacancy, the intervalley interference term makes the phase of the density wind by ±1 around the defect, producing a visible wavefront dislocation; integrating the phase gradient along any contour around the defect returns the winding number. The same filtering protocol applied to a chiral-symmetry-breaking adatom yields Friedel oscillations and no stable dislocation, showing the method separates topological from non-topological defects. This gives a direct, imaging-based route to identify and characterize topological quantum states.

What carries the argument

The central object is the phase χ(r,n)=ΔK·r+nθ living in the intervalley interference term of the density. The argument turns on the identity Nzm=|Index D|=|ν|, where D is the off-diagonal block of a chiral Hamiltonian, and on the contour integral (1/2π)∮∇χ·dr=ν. The wavefront dislocation is the real-space manifestation of this identity: a single extra wavefront terminating at the defect, whose winding number counts the topological zero modes. The Fourier-filtering protocol extracts exactly this intervalley phase from an STM image, making the integer observable.

What would settle it

Use the same STM image of a graphene vacancy and filter around each of the other two pairs of satellite peaks, with different filter-window sizes; if the winding number from the contour integral changes, the read-out is not a protected invariant. Alternatively, simulate the vacancy density with two different radial prefactors (r vs r²) and check that the winding stays ±1.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the local electronic density contains a direct signature of the topological winding number. For a chiral Hamiltonian, the paper uses the index-theorem chain Nzm=|Index D|=|ν| to link the number of zero modes to the topological invariant ν. For a vacancy in graphene, the intervalley contribution to the density variation takes the form δρΔK(r)=F(r)[cos(ΔK·r)−cos(ΔK·r+2θ)], whose phase χ(r,n)=ΔK·r+nθ has a winding (1/2π)∮∇χ·dr=±1 around the defect. Solving Dψ=0 gives Index D=ν=±1 and Nzm=1, so the observed dislocation pattern is interpreted as a topological zero mode. The paper demonstrates that this pattern appears both in tight-binding simulations and in existing STM

Load-bearing premise

The method assumes that the filtering step pulls out one clean interference pattern and that nothing else (background oscillations, the other satellite signals, or numerical noise near low-amplitude points) adds comparable phase gradients; if that fails, the winding number read from the image is not protected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • STM images of a single defect become a direct probe of the winding number, eliminating the need for edge-state transport or Hall measurements.
  • A standardized Fourier-filtering step separates topological defects (vacancy, ν=±1) from non-topological ones (adatom, no stable winding).
  • The protocol works on already published STM data, so it can be applied to existing images without new instrumentation.
  • The same index-theorem chain, applied to other chiral-symmetric Hamiltonians, would give a local real-space route to their winding numbers.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A built-in consistency test follows from the six satellite peaks: filtering around each of the three diametrically opposed pairs should return the same ν; the paper does not report this cross-check, so it is a natural next validation.
  • The method should extend to other local chiral defects and to classical wave systems (photonic, acoustic, cold-atom) where a local field is imaged, since the dislocation mechanism relies only on interference and chirality.
  • The protocol's practical limit is likely phase reconstruction near the dislocation core, where the intervalley amplitude is small; injecting controlled noise into synthetic density maps would show how much filtering robustness the method has.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a general method to extract the topological winding number ν of chiral-symmetric Hamiltonians from wavefront dislocations in the local electronic density δρ(r). The central chain is Nzm = |Index D| = |ν| (Eq. 2), with ν read from a contour integral of the phase gradient of the intervalley LDOS (Eq. 4). The method is demonstrated on a graphene vacancy (topological, ν = ±1) versus an adatom (non-topological), using tight-binding simulations and a published STM image (Fig. 4). The authors argue that the dislocation pattern in δρ after a standardized Fourier filtering step directly measures the topological invariant.

Significance. If the proposed protocol is robust, it would provide a rare observable—real-space imaging of the winding number—for chiral topological phases, and would potentially extend to other platforms with intervalley/defect interference. The manuscript is commendably explicit about numerical parameters (dE = 10^-4 t, i0+ = 10^-5 t, PBC, V0 = -3t, ε_F = 0.6t) and the vacancy/adatom contrast is physically plausible. However, the two load-bearing steps—the adopted form of the intervalley phase and the hand-tuned Fourier filter—are not independently validated, so the central claim of a general and definitive method remains conditional.

major comments (3)
  1. [Supplementary 'Filtering intervalley scattering' and Fig. 1b] The extracted winding number is not shown to be robust to the filter's hand-set choices. The protocol retains two of the six satellite peaks, uses an 8-pixel window, and reinstates phases after inverse filtering; no test varies the peak pair, window size, or the r (or r²) prefactor, and no leakage estimate is given for the excluded peaks, dc component, or Friedel rings. Since Eq. (4) requires contour-independent phase data, a demonstration that the readout ν is invariant under these choices is essential to support the method's generality.
  2. [Eqs. (7)–(8)] The phase χ(r,n) = ΔK·r + nθ with n = 2 is imported from the same group's ref. 14. This already fixes an angular winding of 2, so the subsequent identification ν = ±1 in Fig. 3b and Fig. 4b is substantially predetermined by the assumed analytic form rather than independently measured. To support the claim that δρ(r) 'allows computing' ν, the manuscript should either derive Eq. (7) within this paper, or test the protocol against a system whose winding is known from an independent method and verify that the extracted ν does not depend on the assumed n.
  3. [Section 'Interferences Measure Topology', text near Eq. (2)] The equality Nzm = |Index D| = |ν| is asserted, but the paper does not independently compute Index D for the vacancy potential; it cites ref. 14 for Index D = ν = ±1. For a genuine measurement, the numerical tight-binding model should allow a direct count of zero modes (or a direct computation of Index D) to be compared with the wavefront-dislocation readout. Without such a check, the measured ν and the zero-mode count are connected only by an external assumption, leaving the central chain untested.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Author affiliation] "T echnion" contains a spurious space; should read "Technion."
  2. [Main text, paragraph after Eq. (5)] The sentence "variations in local electronic density δρ(r) in (1) as a result of external potentials" should refer to Eq. (3), not Eq. (1).
  3. [Fig. 1 caption] The statement that the FT filter "was done on the original 36 × 57 numerical results" is unclear: the figure shows a cropped region, so the description should specify whether filtering and inverse FT are performed on the full lattice before cropping.
  4. [Figs. 5 and 6] The adatom case is described as having "no dislocations near the adatom" after filtering, but Fig. 6 shows alternating ±1 dislocations at large distances with zero net winding. This distinction should be explicitly reconciled in the caption or text to avoid confusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Central equality and vacancy density expression are imported from same-group citations; the extracted winding is fixed by the defined nθ phase, but external STM validation gives the claim independent content.

  1. self citation load bearing [Eqs. (7)–(8) and the paragraph after Eq. (8); Eq. (2)]
    "For a vacancy, it becomes14, δ ρ∆K (rrr) =F(r) [cos χ (rrr,0) − cos χ (rrr,2)] . ... Both (7) and Fig.3b allow computing a winding number (4), here ν = ±1. Solving Dψ = 0 yields Index D = ν = ±114, corresponding to Nzm = 1."

    The winding ν is read off from Eq. (7), which is imported from ref. [14] by the same authors, and the equality of that winding with the topological index is also assigned via 'Solving Dψ = 0 yields Index D = ν = ±1 [14]'. The nθ term in the phase defined by Eq. (8) is exactly what produces the single dislocation, so the predicted ν=±1 is fixed by the phase the authors defined in their prior work; the connection of this ν to Index D is asserted by self-citation rather than derived in the present text. This makes the central chain self-citation load-bearing, although external STM data and the adatom control provide independent validation.

full rationale

The paper's central chain (2) is stated, not proven here, and the concrete vacancy density expression (7) is taken from ref. 14, whose authors overlap with the present paper. The advertised 'prediction' ν=±1 is to a significant degree the winding of the authors' own previously defined phase, and the identification of that winding with the index D is also delegated to the same ref. 14. This is load-bearing self-citation rather than a fully independent derivation. However, the method is not merely self-referential: it is tested against an external published STM image of a graphene vacancy (ref. 42) and against a non-topological adatom control that yields no dislocation, and the tight-binding simulation independently produces the same pattern. The hand-set filtering choices (two of six peaks, 8-pixel window) are a robustness concern but not a circular reduction, since no parameter was fitted to force the dislocation. On balance, some self-citation supports the central claim, but independent benchmarks give it real content, so partial circularity at level 4.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the 'dislocation' is an observable interference pattern. The ledger is dominated by hand-set analysis parameters (filter window, peak-pair choice, orbital smoothing length) and by the self-cited index-theoretic and phase-ansatz axioms from refs. 12 and 14. The chiral symmetry and fermion-doubling assumptions are standard for graphene-like models.

free parameters (6)
  • adatom on-site energy V0 = -3t
    Chosen for the non-topological contrast case; characterizes the adatom simulation only.
  • Fermi energy epsilon_F = 0.6t
    Chosen integration endpoint for the LDOS in the adatom example.
  • FFT filter window width = 8 pixels
    Hand-set window around the satellite peaks; not justified as standard and no sensitivity test is given.
  • satellite peak pair selection = 2 of 6 peaks
    The protocol keeps two diametrically opposite peaks to avoid overlapping signals; the winding readout can depend on this condensation choice.
  • orbital reconstruction decay length a = not stated
    Exponential smoothing length in the discrete-to-continuum embedding; the numerical value is absent, so the displayed density maps are not fully reproducible.
  • radius prefactor r (and r^2) before FT = n/a, analytic choice
    Multiplication by r compensates radial decay; its effect on the extracted phase is not analyzed.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Chain of equalities Nzm = |Index D| = |nu| for chiral Hamiltonians with localized potentials
    Stated as Eq. (2) and attributed to refs. 12 and 14 from the same group; not re-derived here.
  • ad hoc to paper Vacancy intervalley LDOS has phase chi(r,n) = Delta K . r + n theta with n = 2 (Eqs. 7-8)
    The angular index n = 2 fixes the winding result nu = +/-1; its derivation is delegated to ref. 14.
  • domain assumption Two-valley structure and intervalley scattering governed by Nielsen-Ninomiya fermion doubling
    Used to motivate the three satellite pairs in the Fourier transform and the intervalley channel selection.
  • domain assumption Chiral symmetry {H, sigma3} = 0 of the honeycomb Hamiltonian is preserved by a single vacancy and permits the symmetrized energy integral in the LDOS
    Used in the numerical method section; real graphene vacancies involve reconstruction, magnetism, and broken particle-hole symmetry beyond nearest-neighbor tight binding.
  • standard math Atiyah-Singer / Callias index theorem applies to the defect Dirac operator D
    The index theorem itself is standard mathematics (refs. 5-9); its applicability to the graphene vacancy operator is the content of refs. 12 and 14 and is presumed rather than shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Winding Numbers from Wavefront Dislocations in Local Electronic Density." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UQCWX2ZL

@misc{pith2026250819128,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Winding Numbers from Wavefront Dislocations in Local Electronic Density},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UQCWX2ZL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19128}
}
abstract

Topological materials are characterized by integer invariants that underpin robust quantized electronic properties, as exemplified by the Chern number in the integer quantum Hall effect. Yet, for most candidate systems, the observable linked to the topological invariant remains unknown, precluding direct verification of their topological nature. We present a general method to identify topological materials by connecting the local electronic density~$\delta\rho(\bm{r})$ to Atiyah-Singer index theorems. This method offers a concrete protocol for determining the winding number, the topological invariant associated with chiral-symmetric Hamiltonians. It also identifies a contour-independent wavefront dislocation pattern in $\delta\rho(\bm{r})$ arising from interference induced by topological defects and demonstrates its application to numerical simulations and to existing STM data. The method clearly distinguishes topological states from non-topological ones through a unified, standardized filtering step, offering a definitive approach for identifying and characterizing quantum topological states and opening the door to their use as robust, entangleable building blocks in quantum technologies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.19128 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Honeycomb lattice with a vacancy set at the origin. (a): numerical result for rδ ρ (r) obtained for a 36×57 nearest neighbors tight binding model with periodic boundary conditions. A smaller region of 36×30 surrounding the vacancy was cut out. (b) Absolute value |FT (rδ ρnum.(r))| of (a). The intervalley coupling appears in the inset as six satellite points, arising from three contributions of two distinguishable va… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) The local electronic density at an adatom is determined through a tight-binding simulation of a 36×56 lattice, centered at its core, with εF = 0.6t and an adatom onsite potential of −3t. (b) illustrates the findings from (a) after subtracting the local density ρ0 of graphene without the adatom. (c): displays the outcomes depicted in (b), concentrating on two Dirac points, utilizing a filter fine enough to exclud… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Variation of the local electronic density calculated from (7) and associated to intervalley coupling due to a vacancy potential. (a) Fourier transform absolute value of taken for F(r) = r −2 and plotted in arbitrary units, showing two peaks for scattering between the two valleys due to fermion doubling. (b) a plot of (7) where the analytical expression was evaluated while choosing a ∆K. A dislocation pattern is clea… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Graphene with a vacancy. (a): STM measurements42 with added wavefront lines (dashed white and red). A single wavefront terminates at the vacancy. (b) The findings shown in (a) after applying FT filtering to two intervalley contributions, clearly exhibiting one wavefron…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The local electronic density of an adatom is illustrated using (9). (a) The absolute value of the Fourier transform reveals two prominent intensity rings situated around the Dirac points, indicative of Friedel oscillations. (b) Displays r 2δ ρ(r) given εF = 0.6t and V0…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Large distance behavior of honeycomb with adatom after filtering out the Friedel oscillations. We marked with two different colors, green and red, two opposite sign ±1 dislocations, References 1. Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Restoring atomic orbital information from tight binding simulation. (a) Base definition of a vector in the tight-binding calculation, where each entry represents the wavefunction at a certain atomic site. The first (last) N/2 entries belong to sublattice A (B). (b) Def…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Electron state tomography from quasiparticle interference maps

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Proposes impurity-based tomography to extract electron density matrices and quantum geometric tensor from QPI maps via symmetry disentanglement in honeycomb models.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hasan, M. Z. & Kane, C. L. Colloquium: Topological insulators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 3045–3067 (2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    & Zhang, S.-C

    Qi, X.-L. & Zhang, S.-C. Topological insulators and superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1057–1110 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    J., Kohmoto, M., Nightingale, M

    Thouless, D. J., Kohmoto, M., Nightingale, M. P. & den Nijs, M. Quantized hall conductance in a two-dimensional periodic potential. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405–408 (1982)

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    v., Dorda, G

    Klitzing, K. v., Dorda, G. & Pepper, M. New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure constant based on quantized hall resistance. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494–497 (1980)

    work page 1980

  5. [5]

    Atiyah, M. F. & Singer, I. M. The index of elliptic operators: I. Annals Math. 87, 484–530 (1968)

    work page 1968

  6. [6]

    Geometry, topology and physics

    Nakahara, M. Geometry, topology and physics. Graduate student series in physics (Hilger, Bristol, 1990)

    work page 1990

  7. [7]

    Niemi, A. J. & Semenoff, G. W. Spectral asymmetry on an open space. Phys. Rev. D 30, 809–818 (1984)

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    Atiyah, M. F. & Singer, I. M. The index of elliptic operators on compact manifolds. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 69, 422 – 433 (1963)

    work page 1963

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    & Levy, S

    Yankowsky, E., Schwarz, A. & Levy, S. Quantum Field Theory and Topology . Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors

    Kitaev, A. Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors. AIP Conf. Proc. 1134, 22–30 (2009)

    2009

  3. [11]

    P., Ryu, S., Furusaki, A

    Schnyder, A. P., Ryu, S., Furusaki, A. & Ludwig, A. W. W. Classification of topological insulators and superconductors in three spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. B 78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Goft, A., Abulafia, Y ., Orion, N., Schochet, C. L. & Akkermans, E. Defects in graphene: A topological description. Phys. Rev. B 108, 054101 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    & Akkermans, E

    Goft, A. & Akkermans, E. Engineering topological materials. arXiv 2508.04927 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  6. [14]

    & Akkermans, E

    Abulafia, Y ., Goft, A., Orion, N. & Akkermans, E. Defects potentials for two-dimensional topological materials.arXiv 2507.01530 (2025). 6/9

    2025 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Teo, J. C. Y . & Kane, C. L. Topological defects and gapless modes in insulators and superconductors.Phys. Rev. B 82, 115120 (2010)

    2010

  8. [16]

    Chiu, C.-K., Teo, J. C. Y ., Schnyder, A. P. & Ryu, S. Classification of topological quantum matter with symmetries.Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  9. [17]

    Calderón, M. J. & Bascones, E. Interactions in the 8-orbital model for twisted bilayer graphene. Phys. Rev. B 102, 155149 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    & Bernevig, B

    Song, Z.-D. & Bernevig, B. A. Magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene as a topological heavy fermion problem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 047601 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Fractional and majorana fermions: the physics of zero-energy modes

    Jackiw, R. Fractional and majorana fermions: the physics of zero-energy modes. Phys. Scripta 2012, 014005 (2012)

    2012

  12. [20]

    D., Freedman, M

    Sarma, S. D., Freedman, M. & Nayak, C. Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation. npj Quantum Inf. 1, 15001 (2015)

    2015

  13. [21]

    & Akkermans, E

    Ovdat, O., Don, Y . & Akkermans, E. Vacancies in graphene: Dirac physics and fractional vacuum charges.Phys. Rev. B 102, 075109 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    Aidelsburger, M. et al. Measuring the Chern number of Hofstadter bands with ultracold bosonic atoms. Nat. Phys. 11, 162–166 (2015)

    2015

  15. [23]

    Topological invariant and the quantization of the hall conductance

    Kohmoto, M. Topological invariant and the quantization of the hall conductance. Annals Phys. 160, 343–354 (1985)

    1985

  16. [24]

    & Resta, R

    Bianco, R. & Resta, R. Mapping topological order in coordinate space. Phys. Rev. B 84, 241106 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Chalopin, T. et al. Probing chiral edge dynamics and bulk topology of a synthetic Hall system. Nat. Phys. 16, 1017–1021 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    & Delplace, P

    Dutreix, C. & Delplace, P. Geometrical phase shift in friedel oscillations. Phys. Rev. B 96, 195207 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    & Fabrice, M

    Dutreix, C., Matthieu, B., Pierre, D. & Fabrice, M. Wavefront dislocations reveal the topology of quasi-1d photonic insulators. Nat. Commun. 12, 3571 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Jotzu, G. et al. Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions. Nature 515, 237–240 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    Hashimoto, K. et al. Quantum hall transition in real space: From localized to extended states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 256802 (2008)

    2008

  22. [30]

    A., Hughes, T

    Bernevig, B. A., Hughes, T. L. & Zhang, S.-C. Quantum spin hall effect and topological phase transition in hgte quantum wells. Science 314, 1757–1761 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    König, M. et al. Quantum spin hall insulator state in hgte quantum wells. Science 318, 766–770 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    Mancini, M. et al. Observation of chiral edge states with neutral fermions in synthetic hall ribbons.Science 349, 1510–1513 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Hu, W. et al. Measurement of a topological edge invariant in a microwave network. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011012 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    & Hafezi, M

    Mittal, S., Ganeshan, S., Fan, J., Vaezi, A. & Hafezi, M. Measurement of topological invariants in a 2D photonic system. Nat. Photonics 10, 180–183 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    & Zirnbauer, M

    Altland, A. & Zirnbauer, M. R. Nonstandard symmetry classes in mesoscopic normal-superconducting hybrid structures. Phys. Rev. B 55, 1142–1161 (1997)

    1997

  28. [36]

    Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Z2 topological order and the quantum spin hall effect. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 146802 (2005)

    2005

  29. [37]

    & Kane, C

    Fu, L. & Kane, C. L. Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump. Phys. Rev. B 74, 195312 (2006)

    2006

  30. [38]

    Kane, C. L. & Mele, E. J. Quantum spin hall effect in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  31. [39]

    Sichau, J. et al. Resonance microwave measurements of an intrinsic spin-orbit coupling gap in graphene: A possible indication of a topological state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 046403 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    & Ninomiya, M

    Nielsen, H. & Ninomiya, M. The adler-bell-jackiw anomaly and weyl fermions in a crystal. Phys. Lett. B 130, 389–396 (1983)

    1983

  33. [41]

    Katsnelson, M. I. Graphene carbon in two dimensions (Cambridge university press, 1979)

    1979

  34. [42]

    M., Brihuega, I., Guinea, F

    Ugeda, M. M., Brihuega, I., Guinea, F. & Gómez-Rodríguez, J. M. Missing atom as a source of carbon magnetism. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 096804 (2010). 7/9

    2010

  35. [43]

    Dutreix, C. et al. Measuring the berry phase of graphene from wavefront dislocations in friedel oscillations. Nature 574, 219–222 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Zhang, Y ., Su, Y . & He, L. Local berry phase signatures of bilayer graphene in intervalley quantum interference.Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 116804 (2020)

    2020

  37. [45]

    & Yang, W

    Zhang, S.-H., Yang, J., Shao, D.-F., Wu, Z. & Yang, W. Robust wavefront dislocations of friedel oscillations in gapped graphene. Phys. Rev. B 103, L161407 (2021)

    2021

  38. [46]

    & Mesaros, A

    Engström, L., Simon, P. & Mesaros, A. Detecting the topological winding of superconducting nodes via local density of states. Phys. Rev. B 111, 134505 (2025). Acknowledgements This research was funded by the Israel Science Foundation Grant No. 772/21 and the Pazy Foundation. A...

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.