Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 94 references

The 53.8-minute pulsar ASKAP J1935+2148 could be a Crab-like pulsar spun down by particle wind in 0.1–1 Myr, with radio bursts powered by magnetic reconnection of local magnetar-strength fields.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Ultra-long period pulsars may be Crab-like pulsars spun down by particle winds, with their radio emission powered by local magnetic reconnection instead of rotation.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection A plausible qualitative scenario for ULPPs whose quantitative support is not reproducible as written—worth refereeing, but it needs a major arithmetic overhaul. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2508.19801 v1 pith:BA6CZYD2 submitted 2025-08-27 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

On Ultra-long Period (53.8 min) Pulsar ASKAP J1935+2148: Coherent Radio Emission Triggered by Local Superstrong Magnetic Reconnection

Zhi-Yao Yang , Cheng-Min Zhang , De-Hua Wang , Erbil G\"ugercino\u{g}lu , Xiang-Han Cui , Jian-Wei Zhang , Shu Ma , Yun-Gang Zhou This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords ultra-long period pulsarsASKAP J1935+2148magnetic reconnectionradio emissionparticle wind brakingneutron star magnetospheresdeath linemagnetars
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proposes that ultra-long-period pulsars (ULPPs) are late evolutionary products of ordinary Crab-like pulsars, and it uses the 53.8-minute ASKAP J1935+2148 as the test case. Combined magnetic-dipole and particle-wind braking—with coefficients fitted to the Crab pulsar—evolves a normal pulsar period to 54 minutes in about 0.1–1 Myr, which the pure magnetic-dipole model cannot do. The paper then notes that five of eight ULPPs have radio luminosities exceeding their rotational energy loss rates, so rotation-powered gap emission cannot explain them; instead, magnetic reconnection in locally concentrated magnetar-strength multipolar fields releases stored magnetic energy that is converted to coherent radio emission. If this picture holds, coherent radio emission from neutron stars has two distinct origins: rotation-powered voltage for normal pulsars and reconnection-powered bursts for ULPPs.

Core claim

The central claim is that the same object can account for both puzzles of ASKAP J1935: its ultra-long spin period and its radio emission. Starting from a Crab-like neutron star with the spin-down law −Ωdot = aΩ³ + bΩ (magnetic dipole plus particle wind), the paper evolves the period to 53.8 min on a timescale of roughly 110 kyr, or about a Myr if the wind coefficient is an order of magnitude smaller. The radio emission is argued to be powered not by rotational energy—since L_R > Edot for five of eight ULPPs and all sit far below the death line—but by magnetic reconnection of local superstrong fields of magnetar strength concentrated near the polar cap. The paper estimates the stored magnetic

What carries the argument

The paper's spin-period machinery is the MDR+wind model, written as −Ωdot = aΩ³ + bΩ, where the aΩ³ term is magnetic dipole radiation and the bΩ term is torque from a relativistic particle wind; the constants a and b are taken from fits to the Crab pulsar, and the b term dominates at long periods, producing the 54-minute spin period within 0.1–1 Myr. The emission machinery is magnetic reconnection of local superstrong multipolar fields: Hall drift creates small-scale magnetar-strength field spots on the polar cap, magnetic energy EB = B²V/8π decays over td = max(τ_Ohm, τ_Hall), and the released power LX is translated to radio luminosity LR = 10^-4 LX using a stellar coronal X-ray/radio corre

Load-bearing premise

The radio luminosity estimate assumes that the ~10^-4 X-ray-to-radio efficiency measured for stellar coronae applies to coherent radio emission produced by magnetic reconnection at a neutron star polar cap, and that the wind-braking coefficient fitted to the Crab pulsar stays constant for 0.1–1 Myr; if either fails, the claimed compatibility with the observed 4×10^30 erg/s upper limit and the 54-minute evolution timescale do not follow.

What would settle it

A sensitive X-ray observation of ASKAP J1935+2148: the model requires a magnetic energy release rate of roughly 5×10^33 erg/s in the polar-cap region to feed the claimed radio luminosity through Eq. 18, so an X-ray upper limit well below that (or, alternatively, a securely measured spin-down luminosity above its radio luminosity) would rule out reconnection as the power source. On the evolutionary side, finding a radio ULPP with a period between about 10 s and 18 min would test the predicted eventual filling of the period gap.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the model is right, ASKAP J1935+2148 and the other ULPPs are not magnetars or white dwarfs but evolved normal pulsars with ages of roughly 0.1–1 Myr.
  • The period gap between about 10 s and 18 min should be populated by future radio surveys if it is a selection effect; if it persists, ULPPs may be born with slower periods after buried local fields diffuse out.
  • ULPP radio emission should show signs of magnetic reconnection—mode switching, transient bursts, and strong circular polarization—rather than steady rotation-powered gap emission, with RRATs and radio magnetars as possible intermediate cases.
  • The L_R versus Edot dichotomy (ULPPs with L_R > Edot, normal pulsars with L_R < Edot) becomes a direct diagnostic for identifying reconnection-powered sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if local reconnection powers ULPP radio bursts, the same mechanism may operate in other slowly spinning magnetized neutron stars, potentially linking ULPPs to fast radio bursts, where reconnection is already a leading explanation.
  • Editorial inference: the paper borrows the ~10^-4 radio/X-ray efficiency from stellar coronae without deriving it for neutron-star-polar-cap reconnection; a larger ULPP sample could measure this efficiency empirically and test whether it is universal.
  • Editorial inference: the model holds the wind-braking coefficient b constant over the full evolution; if b decays as the wind weakens, the 0.1–1 Myr timescale would shift, and the observed spread in ULPP periods could be used to reconstruct the history of b(t).
  • Editorial inference: the two 'fast' ULPPs with periods of 76 s and 421 s sit inside the normal-pulsar cluster in the L_R–Edot plane; future timing may catch a transition from rotation-powered to reconnection-powered emission as the spin-down evolves.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper proposes that ASKAP J1935+2148 and other ultra-long-period pulsars (ULPPs) evolved from Crab-like normal pulsars via relativistic particle-wind braking on a timescale of about 0.1–1 Myr, and that their radio emission, which for five ULPPs exceeds the rotational energy-loss rate, is powered by magnetic reconnection of local superstrong (magnetar-strength) multipolar fields rather than by rotation-powered gap acceleration. The authors use the magnetic-dipole+wind (MDR+W) model with parameters from Zhang et al. (2022) to compute spin evolution, estimate magnetic energy release from crustal field decay to obtain an X-ray luminosity, and convert this to a radio luminosity using the stellar coronal ratio η≈10^-4. They conclude that coherent radio emission from pulsars may have two distinct origins.

Significance. If quantitatively supported, the paper would offer a unifying evolutionary channel for ULPPs and a new emission mechanism that explains the observed L_R > Edot dichotomy. The compilation of the eight known ULPPs and the clear statement of the radio-luminosity/spin-down discrepancy are useful. The analytical MDR+W integration is transparent, and the paper makes a falsifiable prediction about the period gap while explicitly acknowledging sample-size limitations (§4.5). However, the quantitative support in §3 is internally inconsistent, and the radio-efficiency calibration is borrowed from a different astrophysical context; these issues currently prevent the emission-leg and the quantitative time-scale claim from being accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eq. (10)] The volume V is inconsistent. The text says V is the volume of the strong-field region and then takes V=(4πR^3)/3 for a 10-km neutron star, but that gives 4.19×10^18 cm^3, not the quoted 4.19×10^16 cm^3. The adopted value corresponds to a sphere of radius ≈2.1 km, i.e., a polar-cap-like volume. Since E_B, L_X, and L_R all scale linearly with V, the entire quantitative emission chain is affected. Please state unambiguously which volume is used and justify that value.
  2. [§3, Eqs. (13)–(17)] The quoted numbers do not follow from the stated equations. With B_i=1e16 G, σ=1e24 s^-1, L=1 km, n_e=1e33 cm^-3, Eq. (14) gives τ_Hall≈6.4 yr, not 6.4 kyr. Because τ_Hall≪τ_Ohm, the Hall term in Eq. (15) cannot be dropped at t~τ_Ohm; substituting gives B/B_i≈8.6×10^-7, i.e., B*≈1e10 G, not 3.68×10^15 G. Likewise Eq. (16) with E_B from Eq. (10) and t_d=τ_Ohm yields L_X≈(0.6–2.5)×10^33 erg/s, not the quoted 3.64×10^34 erg/s, and the later value 4.92×10^33 erg/s is yet different. Consequently the L_R used in Eq. (18) is not a reproducible model output.
  3. [§3, Eq. (18)] The efficiency η≈10^-4 is not established for coherent neutron-star reconnection emission. It is taken from the coronal radio/X-ray correlation of active stars and X-ray binaries (Güdel et al. 2008; Fender & Hendry 2000), which applies to incoherent gyrosynchrotron radiation. No microphysical or observational calibration is given for coherent, beamed radio emission produced by magnetic reconnection in a neutron-star polar cap. Since the claimed L_R=4.92×10^29 erg/s is only a factor ~8 below the observed upper limit 4×10^30 erg/s, an order-of-magnitude uncertainty in L_X or η removes the stated consistency. The emission-leg of the central claim therefore lacks quantitative support.
  4. [§2.3, Eq. (7); §4.4] The 0.1–1 Myr timescale is not an independent prediction. a and b are adopted from Zhang et al. (2022), where b is fitted to the Crab pulsar's current P, Pdot, and assumed age; the 1-Myr branch is obtained by arbitrarily reducing b by an order of magnitude. No physical model or independent constraint is offered for this reduction. Thus the statement that a Crab-like pulsar evolves to 54 min in 0.1–1 Myr is a consequence of the assumed parameter range rather than a falsifiable outcome. An independent derivation of b (or its population scatter) is needed before the age claim can be tested.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.3, Eq. (6)] The units 'c·g·s' for a and b are not physical; from -Ωdot = aΩ^3 + bΩ, a has units of time and b of inverse time. Please specify units unambiguously.
  2. [§2.3, Eq. (7)] The statement 'P_m=57.83 ms when t=0' is confusing: P(0)=18.29 ms from the same formula. P_m is a constant in the analytic solution, not the initial period. Please rephrase.
  3. [Table 1 and §3, Eq. (9)] The quoted Edot=1.67×10^26 erg/s for ASKAP J1935 is not what Eq. (9) gives with P=3225.31 s and Pdot<1.2×10^-10 s/s (≈1.4×10^26 erg/s). Indicate which value of Pdot was used.
  4. [Fig. 2 and 3 captions] In Fig. 2 the curves labeled Curve-1/2/3 are not identified in the caption; define them as MDR+W, power-law, and MDR, respectively. Similar labeling would help in Fig. 3.
  5. [Throughout] The model name appears as 'MDR W' without the plus sign in several places (e.g., §2.3 title and §4.4); use 'MDR+W' consistently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the spin-down timescale rests on Crab-anchored parameters and the radio-luminosity check on an external X-ray/radio scaling.

full rationale

The spin-period evolution argument is a forward integration of the MDR, power-law, and MDR+W equations. The a and b coefficients in Eq. 6 are adopted from Zhang et al. (2022), a self-citation, but those coefficients are fit to the Crab pulsar's observed P, Pdot, and historical age, i.e. external data. The 0.1–1 Myr timescale is obtained by integrating Eq. 7 with those b values, and the 1 Myr branch is an explicit parameter study with b reduced by a factor of 10 (§2.3). Varying a model parameter is not a fitted input renamed as a prediction. Section 4.4 draws a one-parameter family of MDR+W curves with different b values and assigns individual ULPPs to curves; this is model-fitting/illustration, not an independent prediction forced by construction. The emission leg uses the local magnetic energy (Eq. 10), the crustal field-decay solution (Eq. 15), and the scaling LR = 10^-4 LX (Eq. 18), with η borrowed from the stellar X-ray/radio correlation (Güdel et al. 2008; Fender & Hendry 2000). That is an external empirical relation, not a quantity defined in terms of ASKAP J1935's radio luminosity. There are serious internal arithmetic/robustness issues—Eq. 16 with the stated td=4.4 Myr and EB~1.67e47 erg gives LX~6e32 erg/s rather than the quoted 3.64e34 erg/s, and Eq. 17 drops the Hall term despite τ_Hall << τ_Ohm—but these are correctness risks, not circularity. No step reduces the claimed result to its own input by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

7 free parameters · 7 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central formation timescale is governed by parameters a, b, epsilon_i fitted to the Crab pulsar, and the emission budget depends on assumed B_i, V, eta and decay timescales. These are not derived from first principles or independently measured for ULPPs, so the ledger is heavy. No new particles or forces are introduced; the local field patches are the only invented physical structure.

free parameters (7)
  • Wind braking coefficient b (K2/I) in MDR+W model = 3.15e-12 c.g.s (nominal); varied from b1 to 1e-5 b1 in model curves
    Adopted from Zhang et al. (2022) fit to Crab P, Pdot and assumed age; Section 4.4 varies it by orders of magnitude so evolutionary tracks pass through individual ULPPs.
  • Magnetic dipole coefficient a (K1/I) = 2.67e-16 c.g.s
    Adopted from Zhang et al. (2022) fit to Crab; enters all spin evolution curves.
  • Initial wind-to-dipole ratio epsilon_i = 0.1
    Chosen based on Crab's current spin parameters and true age (Zhang et al. 2022); sets integration constant in Eq. 7.
  • Initial local magnetic field B_i = 1e16 G
    Assumed typical magnetar-strength field for the local polar cap region; not measured for ASKAP J1935.
  • Polar cap volume V = 4.19e16 cm^3 (also scaled as 1e16 cm^3)
    Chosen for the strong-field region; text says NS sphere of R=10 km, whose volume is 4.19e18 cm^3, so the value is inconsistent.
  • Radio-to-magnetic-energy conversion efficiency eta = 1e-4 to 1e-5
    Borrowed from stellar coronal X-ray/radio scaling; no derivation for NS reconnection.
  • Crust conductivity sigma and layer thickness L in Ohmic/Hall timescales = sigma ~1e24 s^-1, L ~1 km
    Standard values adopted, unconstrained for this source; set t_d and hence L_X.
axioms (7)
  • standard math Magnetic dipole radiation spin-down with constant B: -I Omega Omegadot = K1 Omega^4 (Eq. 1).
    Standard pulsar spin-down model used to derive MDR evolution; invoked in Section 2.1.
  • domain assumption Total spin-down is sum of dipole and particle wind torques: -I Omega Omegadot = K1 Omega^4 + K2 Omega^2, with K2 = pi Phi^2/4c (Michel 1969).
    Central to the 0.1-1 Myr formation timescale; the wind torque form is adopted, not derived here (Section 2.3).
  • domain assumption Crab pulsar is a representative progenitor for ULPPs, including initial period ~18-19 ms and field ~3e12 G.
    Section 4.5 explicitly assumes ULPPs have initial characteristics similar to the Crab pulsar; weakens generalizability.
  • domain assumption Magnetic reconnection in local multipolar fields converts stored magnetic energy into coherent radio emission with efficiency eta=1e-4 to 1e-5 (Eq. 18).
    The luminosity match depends on this unvalidated efficiency applied to neutron star reconnection.
  • domain assumption Crustal field decay follows Ohmic plus Hall evolution equation (Eq. 12) with standard parameters.
    Used to estimate present-day local field and magnetic energy release rate; parameters are not measured for this source.
  • domain assumption Death line criterion (B/1e12 G)/P^2 >= 0.2 sets the boundary between radio-live and radio-dead pulsars.
    Used to place ULPPs below the death line; standard but model-dependent, with alternative death valley formulations cited.
  • domain assumption Radio luminosities from Table 1 are isotropic and representative despite upper-limit Pdot and distance errors.
    The claim that 5 ULPPs have L_R > Edot depends on these estimates; distance uncertainties and beaming are not propagated.
invented entities (1)
  • Local superstrong multipolar magnetic field spots in the polar cap no independent evidence
    purpose: Energy reservoir for reconnection-powered coherent radio emission; explains L_R > Edot for ULPPs.
    No direct detection of such spots in ASKAP J1935; inferred from Hall drift simulations and the need to exceed Edot. The paper offers no independent observational handle beyond the same L_R/Edot comparison it explains.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On Ultra-long Period (53.8 min) Pulsar ASKAP J1935+2148: Coherent Radio Emission Triggered by Local Superstrong Magnetic Reconnection." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BA6CZYD2

@misc{pith2026250819801,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On Ultra-long Period (53.8 min) Pulsar ASKAP J1935+2148: Coherent Radio Emission Triggered by Local Superstrong Magnetic Reconnection},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BA6CZYD2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19801}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The eight ultra-long period pulsars (ULPPs) in radio bands have been discovered recently, e.g., ASKAP J1935+2148 with a spin period of 53.8\,min, which are much longer than those of normal pulsars, spanning from 0.016\,s to 23.5\,s, however the origins, spin evolutions and emission mechanisms of these sources are still puzzling. We investigate how the ultra-long period of ASKAP J1935+2148 is evolved by the braking of relativistic particle wind, in a time scale of about 0.1 - 1 Myr, from a normal pulsar with local superstrong magnetic fields. In addition, it is noticed that the ULPPs in the period versus period derivative diagram are much below the ``death line", implying their different characteristics from the normal pulsars. Five sources (including ASKAP J1935+2148) in total eight ULPPs share the rotational energy loss rates to be lower than their respective radio emission luminosities, a phenomenon that can be accounted for by the sustainable radio bursts induced through the reconnection of locally concentrated magnetic field lines.The diversity and complexity of ULPP radio emissions should be closely related to the presence of magnetic reconnection rather than rotational powered discharges in the gaps. Furthermore, it is suggested that the coherent radio emissions of pulsars may have two origins, one from the rotation-powered electric voltage that accounts for the normal pulsar phenomena and the other from the magnetic reconnection-induced continual radio bursts that account for the ULPP observations.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages · 26 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Afonina MD, Biryukov AV, Popov SB (2024) Early accretion onset in long-period isolated pulsars . 41:e014. doi:10.1017/pasa.2024.12, https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.14844 arXiv:2310.14844 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    673(2):L167

    Aguilera DN, Pons JA, Miralles JA (2008) The Impact of Magnetic Field on the Thermal Evolution of Neutron Stars . 673(2):L167. doi:10.1086/527547, https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.1353 arXiv:0712.1353 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  3. [3]

    527(3):7956--7964

    Araujo ECA, De Lorenci VA, Peter P, et al (2024) A phenomenological wobbling model for isolated pulsars and the braking index . 527(3):7956--7964. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3531

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3531 2024

  4. [4]

    Pulsar Death at an Advanced Age

    Arons J (2000) Pulsar Death at an Advanced Age . In: Kramer M, Wex N, Wielebinski R (eds) IAU Colloq. 177: Pulsar Astronomy - 2000 and Beyond, p 449, doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9911478, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9911478 arXiv:astro-ph/9911478

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9911478 2000

  5. [5]

    334(4):743--759

    Asseo E, Khechinashvili D (2002) The role of multipolar magnetic fields in pulsar magnetospheres . 334(4):743--759. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05481.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0203129 arXiv:astro-ph/0203129 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2002

  6. [6]

    Science 378(6620):abj3043

    Bailes M (2022) The discovery and scientific potential of fast radio bursts . Science 378(6620):abj3043. doi:10.1126/science.abj3043, https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.06048 arXiv:2211.06048 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76965-1

    Becker W (2009) Neutron Stars and Pulsars , Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 357. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76965-1

    doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76965-1 2009

  8. [8]

    520(2):1872--1894

    Beniamini P, Wadiasingh Z, Hare J, et al (2023) Evidence for an abundant old population of Galactic ultra-long period magnetars and implications for fast radio bursts . 520(2):1872--1894. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad208, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.09323 arXiv:2210.09323 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Astronomy Letters 47(10):686--694

    Beskin VS, Zagorulia DS, Istomin AY (2021) Magnetic Fields of Neutron Stars . Astronomy Letters 47(10):686--694. doi:10.1134/S1063773721100017

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063773721100017 2021

  10. [10]

    282(3):1059--1063

    Bhattacharya D, Datta B (1996) Ohmic decay of magnetic flux expelled from neutron star interiors . 282(3):1059--1063. doi:10.1093/mnras/282.3.1059

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/282.3.1059 1996

  11. [11]

    203(1-2):1--124

    Bhattacharya D, van den Heuvel EPJ (1991) Formation and evolution of binary and millisecond radio pulsars . 203(1-2):1--124. doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90064-S

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90064-s 1991

  12. [12]

    Nature Astronomy 6:828--836

    Caleb M, Heywood I, Rajwade K, et al (2022) Discovery of a radio-emitting neutron star with an ultra-long spin period of 76 s . Nature Astronomy 6:828--836. doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x, https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.01346 arXiv:2206.01346 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Nature Astronomy 8:1159--1168

    Caleb M, Lenc E, Kaplan DL, et al (2024) An emission-state-switching radio transient with a 54-minute period . Nature Astronomy 8:1159--1168. doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02277-w, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.12266 arXiv:2407.12266 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    442(7105):892--895

    Camilo F, Ransom SM, Halpern JP, et al (2006) Transient pulsed radio emission from a magnetar . 442(7105):892--895. doi:10.1038/nature04986, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0605429 arXiv:astro-ph/0605429 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  15. [15]

    666(2):L93--L96

    Camilo F, Ransom SM, Halpern JP, et al (2007) 1E 1547.0-5408: A Radio-emitting Magnetar with a Rotation Period of 2 Seconds . 666(2):L93--L96. doi:10.1086/521826, https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0002 arXiv:0708.0002 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  16. [16]

    Chen K, Ruderman M (1993) Pulsar Death Lines and Death Valley . 402:264. doi:10.1086/172129

    doi:10.1086/172129 1993

  17. [17]

    533(2):2133--2155

    Cooper AJ, Wadiasingh Z (2024) Beyond the Rotational Deathline: Radio Emission from Ultra-long Period Magnetars . 533(2):2133--2155. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1813, https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.04135 arXiv:2406.04135 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    57:417--465

    Cordes JM, Chatterjee S (2019) Fast Radio Bursts: An Extragalactic Enigma . 57:417--465. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501 [astro-ph.HE]

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104501 2019

  19. [19]

    536(1):L31--L34

    de Gouveia Dal Pino EM, Lazarian A (2000) Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic-Ray Acceleration by Magnetic Reconnection in Newborn Accretion-induced Collapse Pulsars . 536(1):L31--L34. doi:10.1086/312730, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0002155 arXiv:astro-ph/0002155 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  20. [20]

    De Sarkar A, Zhang W, Mart \' n J, et al (2022) LHAASO J2226+6057 as a pulsar wind nebula . 668:A23. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244841, https://arxiv.org/abs/2209.13285 arXiv:2209.13285 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2407.07480

    Dong FA, Clarke T, Curtin AP, et al (2024) The discovery of a nearby 421 -0.5ex transient with CHIME/FRB/Pulsar . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2407.07480. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2407.07480, https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.07480 arXiv:2407.07480 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.07480 2024

  22. [22]

    Duncan RC, Thompson C (1992) Formation of Very Strongly Magnetized Neutron Stars: Implications for Gamma-Ray Bursts . 392:L9. doi:10.1086/186413

    doi:10.1086/186413 1992

  23. [23]

    823(1):34

    Ek s i KY, Anda c IC, C k nto g lu S, et al (2016) The Inclination Angle and Evolution of the Braking Index of Pulsars with Plasma-filled Magnetosphere: Application to the High Braking Index of PSR J1640-4631 . 823(1):34. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/34, https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.01487 arXiv:1603.01487 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  24. [24]

    A very young radio-loud magnetar

    Esposito P, Rea N, Borghese A, et al (2020) A Very Young Radio-loud Magnetar . 896(2):L30. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9742, https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.04083 arXiv:2004.04083 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Esposito P, Rea N, Israel GL (2021) Magnetars: A Short Review and Some Sparse Considerations . In: Belloni TM, M \'e ndez M, Zhang C (eds) Timing Neutron Stars: Pulsations, Oscillations and Explosions, pp 97--142, doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62110-3_3, https://arxiv.org/abs/1803.05716 arXiv:1803.05716

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    317(1):1--8

    Fender RP, Hendry MA (2000) The radio luminosity of persistent X-ray binaries . 317(1):1--8. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03443.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0001502 arXiv:astro-ph/0001502 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2000

  27. [27]

    Evolution of the long-period pulsar GLEAM-X J162759.5-523504.3

    Gen c ali AA, Ertan \"U , Alpar MA (2022) Evolution of the long-period pulsar GLEAM-X J162759.5-523504.3 . 513(1):L68--L71. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac034, https://arxiv.org/abs/2202.06852 arXiv:2202.06852 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Creation of magnetic spots at the neutron star surface

    Geppert U, Vigan \`o D (2014) Creation of magnetic spots at the neutron star surface . 444(4):3198--3208. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1675, https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.3833 arXiv:1408.3833 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Radio pulsar activity and the crustal Hall drift

    Geppert U, Gil J, Melikidze G (2013) Radio pulsar activity and the crustal Hall drift . 435(4):3262--3271. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1527, https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2718 arXiv:1308.2718 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [30]

    Giraud Q, P \'e tri J (2020) Radio and high-energy emission of pulsars revealed by general relativity . 639:A75. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037979

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037979 2020

  31. [31]

    218(5143):731--732

    Gold T (1968) Rotating Neutron Stars as the Origin of the Pulsating Radio Sources . 218(5143):731--732. doi:10.1038/218731a0

    doi:10.1038/218731a0 1968

  32. [32]

    Goldreich P, Reisenegger A (1992) Magnetic Field Decay in Isolated Neutron Stars . 395:250. doi:10.1086/171646

    doi:10.1086/171646 1992

  33. [33]

    Hall drift and the braking indices of young pulsars

    Gourgouliatos KN, Cumming A (2015) Hall drift and the braking indices of young pulsars . 446(1):1121--1128. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2140, https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.3640 arXiv:1406.3640 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  34. [34]

    Million-Degree Plasma Pervading the Extended Orion Nebula

    G \"u del M, Briggs KR, Montmerle T, et al (2008) Million-Degree Plasma Pervading the Extended Orion Nebula . Science 319(5861):309. doi:10.1126/science.1149926, https://arxiv.org/abs/0712.0476 arXiv:0712.0476 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  35. [35]

    240(1):78--84

    Haensel P, Denisov A, Popov S (1990) Neutron star corequake implied by pion condensation - Dynamic, neutrino and thermal effects . 240(1):78--84

    1990

  36. [36]

    Springer

    Haensel P, Potekhin AY, Yakovlev DG (2007) Neutron Stars 1. Springer

    2007

  37. [37]

    601(7894):526--530

    Hurley-Walker N, Zhang X, Bahramian A, et al (2022) A radio transient with unusually slow periodic emission . 601(7894):526--530. doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x 2022

  38. [38]

    619(7970):487--490

    Hurley-Walker N, Rea N, McSweeney SJ, et al (2023) A long-period radio transient active for three decades . 619(7970):487--490. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5

    doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5 2023

  39. [39]

    976(2):L21

    Hurley-Walker N, McSweeney SJ, Bahramian A, et al (2024) A 2.9 hr Periodic Radio Transient with an Optical Counterpart . 976(2):L21. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad890e, https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.15757 arXiv:2408.15757 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    A powerful bursting radio source towards the Galactic Centre

    Hyman SD, Lazio TJW, Kassim NE, et al (2005) A powerful bursting radio source towards the Galactic Centre . 434(7029):50--52. doi:10.1038/nature03400, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0503052 arXiv:astro-ph/0503052 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  41. [41]

    Universe 7(9):351

    Igoshev AP, Popov SB, Hollerbach R (2021) Evolution of Neutron Star Magnetic Fields . Universe 7(9):351. doi:10.3390/universe7090351, https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.05584 arXiv:2109.05584 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  42. [42]

    55(1):261--301

    Kaspi VM, Beloborodov AM (2017) Magnetars . 55(1):261--301. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329 [astro-ph.HE]

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329 2017

  43. [43]

    GLEAM-X J16279.5-523504.3 as a White Dwarf Pulsar

    Katz JI (2022) GLEAM-X J162759.5‑523504.3 as a white dwarf pulsar . 367(11):108. doi:10.1007/s10509-022-04146-2, https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.08112 arXiv:2203.08112 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 110(6):966--972

    Kontorovich VM (2010) Electromagnetic tornado in the vacuum gap of a pulsar . Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 110(6):966--972. doi:10.1134/S1063776110060051

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063776110060051 2010

  45. [45]

    Neutrino Transport in Strongly Magnetized Proto-Neutron Stars and the Origin of Pulsar Kicks: The Effect of Asymmetric Magnetic Field Topology

    Lai D, Qian YZ (1998) Neutrino Transport in Strongly Magnetized Proto-Neutron Stars and the Origin of Pulsar Kicks: The Effect of Asymmetric Magnetic Field Topology . 505(2):844--853. doi:10.1086/306203, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9802345 arXiv:astro-ph/9802345 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  46. [46]

    422(3):2489--2500

    Levin L, Bailes M, Bates SD, et al (2012) Radio emission evolution, polarimetry and multifrequency single pulse analysis of the radio magnetar PSR J1622-4950 . 422(3):2489--2500. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20807.x, https://arxiv.org/abs/1204.2045 arXiv:1204.2045 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2012

  47. [47]

    ://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15739, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15739 arXiv:2411.15739

    Li D, Yuan M, Wu L, et al (2024) A 44-minute periodic radio transient in a supernova remnant. ://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15739, https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15739 arXiv:2411.15739

    arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Cambridge University Press

    Lorimer DR, Kramer M (2012) Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy . Cambridge University Press

    2012

  49. [49]

    477(2):2470--2493

    Lu W, Kumar P (2018) On the radiation mechanism of repeating fast radio bursts . 477(2):2470--2493. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty716, https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.10270 arXiv:1710.10270 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  50. [50]

    Lyne A, Graham-Smith FSB (2022) Pulsar Astronomy

    2022

  51. [51]

    446(1):857--864

    Lyne AG, Jordan CA, Graham-Smith F, et al (2015) 45 years of rotation of the Crab pulsar . 446(1):857--864. doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2118 [astro-ph.HE]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2118 2015

  52. [52]

    Manchester RN, Taylor JH (1977) Pulsars . W. H. Freeman

    1977

  53. [53]

    129(4):1993--2006

    Manchester RN, Hobbs GB, Teoh A, et al (2005) The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Catalogue . 129(4):1993--2006. doi:10.1086/428488 [astro-ph]

    doi:10.1086/428488 2005

  54. [54]

    Solar Physics 67(2):357--375

    Melrose DB (1980 a ) A Plasma Emission Mechanism for Type-I Solar Radio Emission . Solar Physics 67(2):357--375. doi:10.1007/BF00149813

    doi:10.1007/bf00149813 1980

  55. [55]

    Nonthermal processes in diffuse magnetized plasmas - Vol.1: The emission, absorption and transfer of waves in plasmas; Vol.2: Astrophysical applications

    Melrose DB (1980 b ) Plasma astrohysics. Nonthermal processes in diffuse magnetized plasmas - Vol.1: The emission, absorption and transfer of waves in plasmas; Vol.2: Astrophysical applications

    1980

  56. [56]

    486(1):521--533

    Melrose DB (1997) A Solar Flare Model Based on Magnetic Reconnection between Current-carrying Loops . 486(1):521--533. doi:10.1086/304521

    work page doi:10.1086/304521 1997

  57. [57]

    Pulsar Electrodynamics: an unsolved problem

    Melrose DB, Yuen R (2016) Pulsar electrodynamics: an unsolved problem . Journal of Plasma Physics 82(2):635820202. doi:10.1017/S0022377816000398, https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.03623 arXiv:1604.03623 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    Meszaros P (1992) High-energy radiation from magnetized neutron stars . Chicago: University of Chicago Press

    1992

  59. [59]

    Michel FC (1969) Relativistic Stellar-Wind Torques . 158:727. doi:10.1086/150233

    doi:10.1086/150233 1969

  60. [60]

    Reviews of Modern Physics 54(1):1--66

    Michel FC (1982) Theory of pulsar magnetospheres . Reviews of Modern Physics 54(1):1--66. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.54.1

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.54.1 1982

  61. [61]

    Michel FC (1994) Magnetic Structure of Pulsar Winds . 431:397. doi:10.1086/174493

    work page doi:10.1086/174493 1994

  62. [62]

    548:1--34

    Miller MC, Miller JM (2015) The masses and spins of neutron stars and stellar-mass black holes . 548:1--34. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.09.003, https://arxiv.org/abs/1408.4145 arXiv:1408.4145 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  63. [63]

    Physical Review Letters 130(24):245201

    Most ER, Philippov AA (2023) Reconnection-Powered Fast Radio Transients from Coalescing Neutron Star Binaries . Physical Review Letters 130(24):245201. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.245201, https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.14435 arXiv:2207.14435 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Muslimov A, Page D (1996) Magnetic and Spin History of Very Young Pulsars . 458:347. doi:10.1086/176817, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9505116 arXiv:astro-ph/9505116 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  65. [65]

    212(1):6

    Olausen SA, Kaspi VM (2014) The McGill Magnetar Catalog . 212(1):6. doi:10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/6, https://arxiv.org/abs/1309.4167 arXiv:1309.4167 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  66. [66]

    Journal of Geophysical Research 62(4):509--520

    Parker EN (1957) Sweet's Mechanism for Merging Magnetic Fields in Conducting Fluids . Journal of Geophysical Research 62(4):509--520. doi:10.1029/JZ062i004p00509

    doi:10.1029/jz062i004p00509 1957

  67. [67]

    531(1):1805--1822

    Pelisoli I, Chomiuk L, Strader J, et al (2024) A survey for radio emission from white dwarfs in the VLA Sky Survey . 531(1):1805--1822. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1275, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11015 arXiv:2402.11015 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Multipolar electromagnetic fields around neutron stars: exact vacuum solutions and related properties

    P \'e tri J (2015) Multipolar electromagnetic fields around neutron stars: exact vacuum solutions and related properties . 450(1):714--742. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv598, https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.05307 arXiv:1503.05307 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  69. [69]

    485(4):4573--4587

    P \'e tri J (2019) The illusion of neutron star magnetic field estimates . 485(4):4573--4587. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz711, https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.01528 arXiv:1903.01528 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  70. [70]

    Electrodynamics and radiation from rotating neutron star magnetospheres

    P \'e tri J (2020) Electrodynamics and Radiation from Rotating Neutron Star Magnetospheres . Universe 6(1):15. doi:10.3390/universe6010015, https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.03422 arXiv:2001.03422 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    60:495--558

    Philippov A, Kramer M (2022) Pulsar Magnetospheres and Their Radiation . 60:495--558. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-112338

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-112338 2022

  72. [72]

    Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics 5(1):3

    Pons JA, Vigan \`o D (2019) Magnetic, thermal and rotational evolution of isolated neutron stars . Living Reviews in Computational Astrophysics 5(1):3. doi:10.1007/s41115-019-0006-7, https://arxiv.org/abs/1911.03095 arXiv:1911.03095 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [73]

    arXiv e-prints arXiv:2409.05978

    Qu Y, Zhang B (2024) Magnetic Interaction in White Dwarf Binaries as Mechanism for Long-Period Radio Transients . arXiv e-prints arXiv:2409.05978. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.05978, https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.05978 arXiv:2409.05978 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.05978 2024

  74. [74]

    Science 330(6006):944

    Rea N, Esposito P, Turolla R, et al (2010) A Low-Magnetic-Field Soft Gamma Repeater . Science 330(6006):944. doi:10.1126/science.1196088 [astro-ph.HE]

    doi:10.1126/science.1196088 2010

  75. [75]

    940(1):72

    Rea N, Coti Zelati F, Dehman C, et al (2022) Constraining the Nature of the 18 min Periodic Radio Transient GLEAM-X J162759.5-523504.3 via Multiwavelength Observations and Magneto-thermal Simulations . 940(1):72. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac97ea, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.01903 arXiv:2210.01903 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  76. [76]

    Rezzolla L, Pizzochero P, Jones DI, et al (eds) (2018) The Physics and Astrophysics of Neutron Stars , Astrophysics and Space Science Library, vol 457, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97616-7 2018

  77. [77]

    Long-period Pulsars as Possible Outcomes of Supernova Fallback Accretion

    Ronchi M, Rea N, Graber V, et al (2022) Long-period Pulsars as Possible Outcomes of Supernova Fallback Accretion . 934(2):184. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7cec, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.11704 arXiv:2201.11704 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    196:51--72

    Ruderman MA, Sutherland PG (1975) Theory of pulsars: polar gaps, sparks, and coherent microwave radiation. 196:51--72. doi:10.1086/153393

    doi:10.1086/153393 1975

  79. [79]

    Magnetic Reconnection and Particle Acceleration in Active Galactic Nuclei

    Schopper R, Lesch H, Birk GT (1998) Magnetic reconnection and particle acceleration in active galactic nuclei . 335:26--32. doi:10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9803329, https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9803329 arXiv:astro-ph/9803329 [astro-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9803329 1998

  80. [80]

    A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York: Wiley

    Shapiro SL, Teukolsky SA (1983) Black holes, white dwarfs, and neutron stars : the physics of compact objects . A Wiley-Interscience Publication, New York: Wiley

    1983

Showing first 80 references.

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.