Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Infinite towers of 2d symmetry algebras from Carrollian limit of 3d CFT

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the Carrollian limit of CFT3 OPE blocks decomposes them into towers of sl(2,C) blocks whose current and stress tensor sectors reproduce the conformally soft photon and graviton theorems and the S and w1+∞ algebras…

desk verdict A mostly solid derivation of celestial soft algebras from CFT3 Carrollian limits, with one load-bearing renormalization step the authors themselves do not yet understand; worth refereeing, but that step needs to be settled before the central claim is fully established. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.19981 v1 pith:6GJWHOTM submitted 2025-08-27 hep-th

Leonardo Pipolo de Gioia , Ana-Maria Raclariu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords CarrollianlimitcelestialCFTOPEblocksconformalsofttheoremsSalgebraw1+∞weight-shiftingoperatorsAdS/CFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the Carrollian limit of three-dimensional conformal field theory—setting t=cu and sending c→0—is not just a way to extract scattering data, but a mechanism that generates the infinite 2d symmetry algebras of celestial holography. Starting from the OPE blocks (the universal pieces of an operator product expansion that encode the exchange of a given operator) of a scalar, a conserved current, and the stress tensor in CFT3, the authors show that each so(3,2) primary decomposes into a tower of sl(2,C) primaries labeled by negative integer dimensions. The current-scalar-scalar and stress tensor-scalar-scalar blocks reproduce the infinite towers of conformally soft photon and graviton theorems, while the current-current and stress tensor-stress tensor blocks reproduce the S and w_{1+∞} algebras of celestial CFT. If correct, these 2d algebras are not additional structures that must be put in by hand; they are forced by the representation theory of the 3d conformal group and the existence of a conserved current or stress tensor.

What carries the argument

The central object is the CFT3 OPE block written in an integral representation (eq. (33)) in which the three-point function is expressed as a Gaussian integral over an auxiliary point; taking the Carrollian limit t_i=c u_i inside this representation before evaluating the u_i moments projects the correlator onto the magnetic Carroll sector and yields standard 2d CFT three-point functions of sl(2,C) primaries of dimensions δ_i=Δ_i−s_i−1. For the spinning operators, the three-point functions are re-expressed as weight-shifting operators acting on scalar correlators, so the scalar result carries over to currents and the stress tensor. A final residue renormalization (eq. (70)) replaces the naive 2d operators by residues that remove unwanted integer poles and produces the celestial OPE coefficients.

What would settle it

Compute the unrenormalized current-current OPE block (eq. (89) with coefficient (90)) for a concrete CFT3, such as the free fermion or free boson with a non-abelian current, without applying the residue prescription (70); if the resulting 2d correlator fails to satisfy the sl(2,C) block decomposition with the exchanged dimension δ3=1−s1−s2, or if the residue prescription cannot be reproduced by a well-defined contour deformation, the central claim collapses. Alternatively, test the first subleading correction in z12 in eq. (89) against the celestial OPE of [45]: the paper's blocks are derived to leading order, and the next term should also match if the identification is correct.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the Carrollian limit of CFT3, the OPE block of two scalar primaries of dimensions Δ1 and Δ2 reduces to a collection of sl(2,C) OPE blocks whose exchanged operator has dimension δ1+δ2−2, with δi=Δi−si−1 for integers si (eq. (52)). Applying the same dimensional reduction to the conserved current (Δ=2, ℓ=1) and the stress tensor (Δ=3, ℓ=2) OPE blocks, the authors find that current modes of dimension 1−s and stress tensor modes of dimension 2−s, with s∈N, satisfy the sl(2,C) OPE blocks (eqs. (89) and (97)) that, after a residue renormalization of the operators, exactly reproduce the celestial OPE blocks of gluons and gravitons from which the S and w_{1+∞} algebras are extracted. The same blocks, expanded in the OPE limit, reproduce the towers of tree-level soft photon and graviton theorems in a conformal primary basis. The paper's claim is that these infinite 2d symmetry algebras are a consequence of nothing more than the decomposition of the unitary so(3,2) representations (2,1) and (3,2) into integer-dimension sl(2,C) representations.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation matches celestial OPE blocks only after the 2d operators are renormalized by taking residues at integer dimensions, a step the authors state they do not fully understand; if that renormalization is not justified, the OPE coefficients carry extra poles and the claimed agreement with the celestial OPE of [45] fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The S algebra and the w_{1+∞} algebra are universal consequences of the existence of a conserved spin-1 or spin-2 operator in a 3d CFT, not of a priori assumptions about a Carrollian or celestial field theory.
  • The towers of conformally soft photon and graviton theorems in 4d flat space arise from the current-scalar-scalar and stress tensor-scalar-scalar OPE blocks of CFT3, to leading order in the Carrollian limit.
  • The Δ=2 conformally soft graviton, which plays a special role in celestial holography, appears as the s=0 mode in the tower of CFT3 stress tensor modes.
  • Subleading corrections in the Carrollian limit are expected to deform w_{1+∞} by terms proportional to the cosmological constant, matching known AdS4 deformations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the derivation only uses kinematically determined three-point functions, the same towers should appear in any CFT3 with a conserved current or stress tensor, including free-field and perturbative fixed points; computing the free-field current block would test universality directly.
  • The residue renormalization (70) may be equivalent to summing over the two global-time-slice expansions of the Lorentzian cylinder, which the authors note differ by phases; if so, the 'unwanted poles' would cancel once both in/out configurations are included.
  • The graviton OPE block is obtained from the current block by squaring the weight-shifting operator (eqs. (88) vs (96)), suggesting that the w_{1+∞} structure constants are a kind of double copy of the S algebra at the level of OPE data—an interpretation the paper notes via the AdS double copy but does not develop for the 2d algebras.
  • The restriction to leading order in the Carrollian limit means the 2d OPE coefficients capture only the collinear/soft part; higher-point CFT3 correlators should produce corrections to the celestial OPE that are currently invisible to the celestial bootstrap.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Carrollian limit of three-dimensional conformal field theory OPE blocks, defined by taking t = c u and c → 0, and shows that scalar, current, and stress-tensor blocks decompose into towers of sl(2,C) blocks with negative integer scaling dimensions. The main applications are that the current-scalar-scalar and stress-tensor-scalar-scalar blocks reproduce the towers of conformally soft photon and graviton theorems, while the current-current and stress-tensor-stress-tensor blocks reproduce the celestial S and w_{1+∞} algebras. The derivation proceeds by first writing CFT3 three-point functions in an integral representation, taking the Carrollian limit inside that representation, and then applying integral transforms to extract 2d conformal primary modes. Spinning correlators are reduced to scalar correlators via explicit weight-shifting operators, and the final OPE blocks are compared with known celestial OPE blocks from the literature.

Significance. If the construction is fully justified, the paper provides a concrete derivation of celestial CFT structures, including the S and w_{1+∞} algebras, from a controlled limit of ordinary CFT3 data. This would be a significant conceptual unification: the infinite towers of soft theorems and the associated 2d symmetry algebras would follow from the decomposition of specific unitary so(3,2) representations rather than being imposed as separate axioms. The paper is explicit and self-contained in most of its technical steps: the weight-shifting operators are written out, the dimensional reduction of the scalar block is performed in detail, and the final OPE coefficients are not fitted but compared with independent computations in refs. [9], [44], and [45]. The main open issues concern the legitimacy of two limiting procedures, the generalized distributional identity in eq. (44) and the residue renormalization in eq. (70), both of which are load-bearing for the advertised conclusions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§5.1, eqs. (69)–(70)] The 2d OPE coefficients derived from dimensional reduction, e.g. c^{2d}_{JO}(s_1, δ_2) in eq. (69), contain poles precisely at the integer dimensions of the conformally soft modes, and the paper removes these poles by the residue renormalization in eq. (70). The authors state on page 15 that they do not fully understand why the dimensionally reduced operators do not coincide with those of celestial CFT. Since the claimed perfect agreement with the celestial OPE blocks of ref. [45] and the subsequent derivation of the soft-theorem towers depend on this renormalization, the central identification is not yet established: without eq. (70), the naive blocks are divergent exactly where the celestial blocks are finite. I ask the authors to derive eq. (70) from a well-defined operator normalization or from a specific correlation-function limit, or to prove that the same result follows from an associativity or OPE-convergence requirement, rather than presenting it as a prescription adopted because it gives the expected answer.
  2. [§4, eq. (44)] The identity lim_{c→0} c^{-ν} = 2πν δ(ν) is used for real values of ν, for example in eq. (45) where it produces the dimension-conserving delta function that projects the λ integral in eq. (50) onto δ_3 = δ_1 + δ_2 − 2. The paper notes that the identity strictly holds only for ν ∈ iR and defers rigor to ref. [70]. This is a load-bearing step because it is the mechanism by which the 3d OPE block is reduced to a single 2d exchange with the dimension predicted by collinear factorization. Please either provide a rigorous justification for the generalized use of eq. (44) in this context, or reformulate the projection as a limit of finite-c expressions that yields the same δ_3 condition without relying on a distributional identity outside its proven domain.
  3. [§4, discussion after eq. (52) and §5–6] The extraction of magnetic Carroll sector correlators involves discarding distributional terms that arise in the c→0 limit, and the paper itself notes that in ref. [32] the electric (distributional) sector was found to dominate at the same order in c. The choice to keep only the power-law magnetic branch is motivated by the goal of recovering standard 2d CFT OPE blocks, but this is close to assuming the desired output. The authors should state a selection rule, observable, or symmetry criterion that uniquely picks out the magnetic Carroll subsector before the distributional terms are discarded, and should show that this criterion is not equivalent to postulating the celestial OPE blocks that are later compared with the literature.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2, eq. (9)] The normalization in eq. (9) appears to contain a typographical error in the factor involving ℓ; the expression '∆−1 ℓ + ∆−1Γ(∆−1/2)' is not typeset as a well-formed product of factors and should be corrected.
  2. [§4, eq. (34)] The definitions of β_{12} and β_{13} are written identically; presumably β_{13} should be (Δ_1 + Δ_3 − Δ_2)/2, and this typo should be fixed because these exponents are used throughout the paper.
  3. [§5.1, eq. (65)] The factor δ(−s_1 + δ_2 + δ_3 − 2)(−s_1 + δ_2 + δ_3 − 2) is written in an unusual order and without parentheses around the distribution argument; making the argument of the delta function explicit would improve readability.
  4. [§6.1] The notation 'S algebra' is not defined in the text; the reader would benefit from a one-line statement that this is the celestial symmetry algebra of pure Yang-Mills theory introduced in refs. [9,10].

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central Carrollian-to-celestial OPE derivation is benchmarked externally, though the eq. (70) residue renormalization is an admitted gap.

full rationale

Walking the derivation chain: the paper's inputs are CFT3 OPE block data (scalar three-point function (32), spinning three-point functions (55)/(80)/(81), and the AdS4 contact-diagram normalizations (40)/(60)/(71)). The Carrollian limit and integral transforms are applied in Sections 4-6, producing 2d sl(2,C) OPE blocks (52), (68), (78), (89), (97). These are compared, not fitted, to independent celestial results: [45] (no author overlap) and [9,11,44]. The only step that could look circular is the residue renormalization in eq. (70): 'In order to obtain the expected OPE block of conformally soft modes, one has to further renormalize the operators... We do not fully understand why the operators we obtain upon dimensional reduction do not exactly coincide with the operators appearing in celestial CFT.' This is an admitted gap, but it is not a fitted parameter: the renormalization extracts the residue of poles already present in the computed coefficients, and the finite coefficients that result are then checked against [45]. Thus the central claim does not reduce by construction to its inputs. The paper does rely on self-citations ([21],[28],[29],[32],[37]) for the Carrollian normalization, the order of limits, and the discrete basis; none is load-bearing: the completeness of the integer basis is explicitly declared irrelevant (footnote 7), and the OPE-block decompositions are derived in the text. Score 2 reflects these minor self-citations and the unresolved renormalization gap, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No numerical parameters are fitted to data; the free-parameter list is empty. The main assumptions are the holographic identification of OPE coefficients with AdS4 Witten diagrams, the generalized use of the distributional identity (44), and the selection of the magnetic Carroll sector. No new particles, forces, or entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The CFT3 three-point functions of conserved currents and the stress tensor with two scalars are uniquely determined by the structure (55), and the associated OPE coefficients are those of AdS4 contact Witten diagrams.
    Invoked in Sections 5 and 6 through eqs. (60), (71), (80), and (81). The universality claim depends on this identification of the three-point structures and coefficients.
  • ad hoc to paper The distributional identity lim_{c→0} c^{-ν} = 2πν δ(ν) can be applied in a generalized sense for real ν.
    Used in eqs. (44)-(45) to project the 2d OPE coefficient onto the exchange dimension δ3 = δ1+δ2-2. The paper notes this holds strictly only for ν ∈ iR and defers to ref. [70], making this an assumed extension.
  • ad hoc to paper The Carrollian limit can be taken before the integral transforms (11), and the resulting magnetic Carroll sector correlators are the relevant ones for celestial CFT.
    Central to Section 4. The paper discards electric (distributional) terms and selects the magnetic sector, a choice not fully derived from first principles, as discussed in the paragraph around eq. (45).
  • standard math Standard conformal field theory machinery, including the embedding space formalism, shadow transforms, and AdS4 Witten diagrams, is valid.
    Used throughout the derivations in Sections 4-6 and the appendices.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Infinite towers of 2d symmetry algebras from Carrollian limit of 3d CFT." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6GJWHOTM

@misc{pith2026250819981,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Infinite towers of 2d symmetry algebras from Carrollian limit of 3d CFT},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6GJWHOTM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.19981}
}
abstract

We consider the Carrollian limit of OPE blocks of scalar primaries, spin-1 currents and the stress tensor in 3-dimensional conformal field theory (CFT$_3$). We demonstrate that these OPE blocks decompose into OPE blocks of towers of $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ modes labeled by negative integer dimensions. We present two applications of this construction. We first show that the current-scalar-scalar and stress tensor-scalar-scalar OPE blocks in CFT$_3$ reduce to $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ OPE blocks from which towers of conformally soft photon and graviton theorems can be derived. We then show that the CFT$_3$ OPE blocks of, respectively, current and stress tensor components dual to positive helicity gluons and gravitons in AdS$_4$ become $\mathfrak{sl}(2,\mathbb{C})$ blocks of conformally soft gluons and gravitons which imply the $S$ and $w_{1 + \infty}$ algebras of celestial CFT.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lectures on Carrollian Holography

    hep-th 2025-11 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Massless scattering amplitudes, including gravitons, can be recast as correlators of a carrollian conformal field theory on null infinity, but the non-perturbative bootstrap program remains incomplete.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [45]

    Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,

    E. Himwich, M. Pate, and K. Singh, “Celestial operator product expansions and w 1+∞ symmetry for all spins,” JHEP 01 (2022) 080, arXiv:2108.07763 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [70]

    Asymptotic Symmetries and Celestial CFT,

    L. Donnay, S. Pasterski, and A. Puhm, “Asymptotic Symmetries and Celestial CFT,” JHEP 09 (2020) 176, arXiv:2005.08990 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2020

  3. [9]

    Holographic Symmetry Algebras for Gauge Theory and Gravity,

    A. Guevara, E. Himwich, M. Pate, and A. Strominger, “Holographic Symmetry Algebras for Gauge Theory and Gravity,” arXiv:2103.03961 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  4. [44]

    Celestial Operator Products of Gluons and Gravitons,

    M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, A. Strominger, and E. Y. Yuan, “Celestial Operator Products of Gluons and Gravitons,” arXiv:1910.07424 [hep-th]

    arXiv 1910

  5. [32]

    Celestial amplitudes from conformal correlators with bulk-point kinematics,

    L. P. de Gioia and A.-M. Raclariu, “Celestial amplitudes from conformal correlators with bulk-point kinematics,” arXiv:2405.07972 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [1]

    Wave equations in conformal space,

    P. A. M. Dirac, “Wave equations in conformal space,” Annals Math. 37 (1936) 429–442

    1936

  7. [2]

    A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time,

    J. de Boer and S. N. Solodukhin, “A Holographic reduction of Minkowski space-time,” Nucl. Phys. B665 (2003) 545–593, arXiv:hep-th/0303006 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2003

  8. [3]

    Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,

    S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger, “Flat Space Amplitudes and Conformal Symmetry of the Celestial Sphere,” Phys. Rev. D96 no. 6, (2017) 065026, arXiv:1701.00049 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 85 references
  1. [4]

    Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,

    S. Pasterski and S.-H. Shao, “Conformal basis for flat space amplitudes,” Phys. Rev. D96 no. 6, (2017) 065022, arXiv:1705.01027 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  2. [5]

    BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra, and A. Strominger, “BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,” JHEP 05 (2015) 151, arXiv:1401.7026 [hep-th]

    2015 arXiv

  3. [6]

    Semiclassical Virasoro symmetry of the quantum gravityS-matrix,

    D. Kapec, V. Lysov, S. Pasterski, and A. Strominger, “Semiclassical Virasoro symmetry of the quantum gravityS-matrix,” JHEP 08 (2014) 058, arXiv:1406.3312 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  4. [7]

    Celestial Diamonds: Conformal Multiplets in Celestial CFT,

    S. Pasterski, A. Puhm, and E. Trevisani, “Celestial Diamonds: Conformal Multiplets in Celestial CFT,” arXiv:2105.03516 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  5. [8]

    Revisiting the Conformally Soft Sector with Celestial Diamonds,

    S. Pasterski, A. Puhm, and E. Trevisani, “Revisiting the Conformally Soft Sector with Celestial Diamonds,” arXiv:2105.09792 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  6. [10]

    w(1+infinity) and the Celestial Sphere,

    A. Strominger, “w(1+infinity) and the Celestial Sphere,” arXiv:2105.14346 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  7. [11]

    Infinite Set of Soft Theorems in Gauge-Gravity Theories as Ward-Takahashi Identities,

    Y. Hamada and G. Shiu, “Infinite Set of Soft Theorems in Gauge-Gravity Theories as Ward-Takahashi Identities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 no. 20, (2018) 201601, arXiv:1801.05528 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [12]

    Holographic chiral algebra: supersymmetry, infinite Ward identities, and EFTs,

    H. Jiang, “Holographic chiral algebra: supersymmetry, infinite Ward identities, and EFTs,” JHEP 01 (2022) 113, arXiv:2108.08799 [hep-th] . 31

    2022 arXiv

  9. [13]

    Higher spin dynamics in gravity and w1+∞ celestial symmetries,

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu, “Higher spin dynamics in gravity and w1+∞ celestial symmetries,” arXiv:2112.15573 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  10. [14]

    On infinite symmetry algebras in Yang-Mills theory,

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu, “On infinite symmetry algebras in Yang-Mills theory,” JHEP 12 (2023) 009, arXiv:2306.02373 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [15]

    All OPEs invariant under the infinite symmetry algebra for gluons on the celestial sphere,

    S. Banerjee, R. Mandal, S. Misra, S. Panda, and P. Paul, “All OPEs invariant under the infinite symmetry algebra for gluons on the celestial sphere,” Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 2, (2024) 026020, arXiv:2311.16796 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [16]

    Celestial w1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,

    T. Adamo, L. Mason, and A. Sharma, “Celestial w1+∞ Symmetries from Twistor Space,” SIGMA 18 (2022) 016, arXiv:2110.06066 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [17]

    Celestial Lw1+∞ charges from a twistor action,

    A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “Celestial Lw1+∞ charges from a twistor action,” JHEP 10 (2024) 250, arXiv:2407.04028 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [18]

    S-algebra in Gauge Theory: Twistor, Spacetime and Holographic Perspectives,

    A. Kmec, L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Sharma, “S-algebra in Gauge Theory: Twistor, Spacetime and Holographic Perspectives,” arXiv:2506.01888 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  15. [19]

    Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e,

    J.-M. L´ evy-Leblond, “Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincar´ e,”Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 3 no. 1, (1965) 1–12

    1965

  16. [20]

    Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,

    C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, and P. A. Horvathy, “Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,” Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014) 092001, arXiv:1402.5894 [gr-qc]

    2014 arXiv

  17. [22]

    The Carrollian Kaleidoscope,

    A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal, and A. Shukla, “The Carrollian Kaleidoscope,” arXiv:2506.16164 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  18. [23]

    Holography in the flat space limit,

    L. Susskind, “Holography in the flat space limit,” AIP Conf. Proc. 493 no. 1, (1999) 98–112, arXiv:hep-th/9901079

    1999 arXiv

  19. [24]

    Flat space scattering and bulk locality in the AdS / CFT correspondence,

    S. B. Giddings, “Flat space scattering and bulk locality in the AdS / CFT correspondence,” Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 106008, arXiv:hep-th/9907129

    2000 arXiv

  20. [25]

    Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,

    J. Penedones, “Writing CFT correlation functions as AdS scattering amplitudes,” JHEP 03 (2011) 025, arXiv:1011.1485 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  21. [26]

    AdS Field Theory from Conformal Field Theory,

    A. L. Fitzpatrick and J. Kaplan, “AdS Field Theory from Conformal Field Theory,” JHEP 02 (2013) 054, arXiv:1208.0337 [hep-th]

    2013 arXiv

  22. [27]

    Soft photon theorems from CFT Ward identites in the flat limit of AdS/CFT,

    E. Hijano and D. Neuenfeld, “Soft photon theorems from CFT Ward identites in the flat limit of AdS/CFT,” JHEP 11 (2020) 009, arXiv:2005.03667 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  23. [28]

    Eikonal Approximation in Celestial CFT,

    L. Pipolo de Gioia and A.-M. Raclariu, “Eikonal Approximation in Celestial CFT,” arXiv:2206.10547 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  24. [29]

    Celestial sector in cft: Conformally soft symmetries,

    L. P. de Gioia and A.-M. Raclariu, “Celestial sector in cft: Conformally soft symmetries,” arXiv:2303.10037 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  25. [30]

    AdS Witten Diagrams to Carrollian Correlators,

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar, and S. Dutta, “AdS Witten Diagrams to Carrollian Correlators,” arXiv:2303.07388 [hep-th] . 32

    arXiv

  26. [31]

    Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll,

    A. Bagchi, P. Dhivakar, and S. Dutta, “Holography in flat spacetimes: the case for Carroll,” JHEP 08 (2024) 144, arXiv:2311.11246 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Carrollian amplitudes from holographic correlators,

    L. F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “Carrollian amplitudes from holographic correlators,” JHEP 03 (2025) 158, arXiv:2406.19343 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Towards a flat space Carrollian hologram from AdS 4/CFT3,

    A. Lipstein, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “Towards a flat space Carrollian hologram from AdS 4/CFT3,” JHEP 06 (2025) 073, arXiv:2504.10291 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  29. [35]

    On Carrollian and Celestial Correlators in General Dimensions,

    H. Kulkarni, R. Ruzziconi, and A. Yelleshpur Srikant, “On Carrollian and Celestial Correlators in General Dimensions,” arXiv:2508.06602 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  30. [36]

    A d-Dimensional Stress Tensor for Minkd+2 Gravity,

    D. Kapec and P. Mitra, “A d-Dimensional Stress Tensor for Minkd+2 Gravity,” JHEP 05 (2018) 186, arXiv:1711.04371 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [37]

    A discrete basis for celestial holography,

    L. Freidel, D. Pranzetti, and A.-M. Raclariu, “A discrete basis for celestial holography,” arXiv:2212.12469 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  32. [38]

    Spinning Conformal Correlators,

    M. S. Costa, J. Penedones, D. Poland, and S. Rychkov, “Spinning Conformal Correlators,” JHEP 11 (2011) 071, arXiv:1107.3554 [hep-th]

    2011 arXiv

  33. [39]

    The 3d Stress-Tensor Bootstrap,

    A. Dymarsky, F. Kos, P. Kravchuk, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “The 3d Stress-Tensor Bootstrap,” JHEP 02 (2018) 164, arXiv:1708.05718 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [40]

    Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,

    A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Kakkar, and A. Mehra, “Flat Holography: Aspects of the dual field theory,” JHEP 12 (2016) 147, arXiv:1609.06203 [hep-th]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Carroll stories,

    J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma, and S. Vandoren, “Carroll stories,” JHEP 09 (2023) 148, arXiv:2307.06827 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  36. [42]

    Gluon Amplitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators,

    S. Pasterski, S.-H. Shao, and A. Strominger, “Gluon Amplitudes as 2d Conformal Correlators,” Phys. Rev. D96 no. 8, (2017) 085006, arXiv:1706.03917 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [43]

    Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,

    W. Fan, A. Fotopoulos, and T. R. Taylor, “Soft Limits of Yang-Mills Amplitudes and Conformal Correlators,” JHEP 05 (2019) 121, arXiv:1903.01676 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,

    A. Saha, “Carrollian approach to 1 + 3D flat holography,” JHEP 06 (2023) 051, arXiv:2304.02696 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    w 1+∞ and Carrollian holography,

    A. Saha, “w 1+∞ and Carrollian holography,” JHEP 05 (2024) 145, arXiv:2308.03673 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Dimensional Reduction for Conformal Blocks,

    M. Hogervorst, “Dimensional Reduction for Conformal Blocks,” JHEP 09 (2016) 017, arXiv:1604.08913 [hep-th] . 33

    2016 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor,

    C.-H. Chang, V. Dommes, R. S. Erramilli, A. Homrich, P. Kravchuk, A. Liu, M. S. Mitchell, D. Poland, and D. Simmons-Duffin, “Bootstrapping the 3d Ising stress tensor,” JHEP 03 (2025) 136, arXiv:2411.15300 [hep-th]

    2025 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Classifying and constraining local four photon and four graviton S-matrices,

    S. D. Chowdhury, A. Gadde, T. Gopalka, I. Halder, L. Janagal, and S. Minwalla, “Classifying and constraining local four photon and four graviton S-matrices,” JHEP 02 (2020) 114, arXiv:1910.14392 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Lectures on conformal field theories,

    H. Osborn, “Lectures on conformal field theories,” 2019

    2019

  44. [52]

    On the Contraction of Groups and Their Representations,

    W. E. Inonu E., “On the Contraction of Groups and Their Representations,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Jun;39(6):510-24 (1953)

    1953

  45. [53]

    The Flat space S-matrix from the AdS/CFT correspondence?,

    M. Gary and S. B. Giddings, “The Flat space S-matrix from the AdS/CFT correspondence?,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 046008, arXiv:0904.3544 [hep-th]

    2009 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Writing cft correlation functions as ads scattering amplitudes,

    J. Penedones, “Writing cft correlation functions as ads scattering amplitudes,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2011 no. 3, (2011) 1–34

    2011

  47. [55]

    The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS,

    M. F. Paulos, J. Penedones, J. Toledo, B. C. van Rees, and P. Vieira, “The S-matrix bootstrap. Part I: QFT in AdS,” JHEP 11 (2017) 133, arXiv:1607.06109 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Double copy structure and the flat space limit of conformal correlators in even dimensions,

    A. E. Lipstein and P. McFadden, “Double copy structure and the flat space limit of conformal correlators in even dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 12, (2020) 125006, arXiv:1912.10046 [hep-th]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    4D flat-space scattering amplitude/CFT3 correlator correspondence revisited,

    S. Jain and A. Mehta, “4D flat-space scattering amplitude/CFT3 correlator correspondence revisited,” Nucl. Phys. B 991 (2023) 116193, arXiv:2201.07248 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT,

    R. Marotta, K. Skenderis, and M. Verma, “Flat space spinning massive amplitudes from momentum space CFT,” JHEP 08 (2024) 226, arXiv:2406.06447 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Spinning ads propagators,

    M. S. Costa, V. Gon¸ calves, and J. Penedones, “Spinning ads propagators,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2014 no. 9, (2014) 1–47

    2014

  52. [60]

    Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,

    L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray, and R. Ruzziconi, “Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 no. 7, (2022) 071602, arXiv:2202.04702 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Shifting spin on the celestial sphere,

    S. Pasterski and A. Puhm, “Shifting spin on the celestial sphere,” Phys. Rev. D 104 no. 8, (2021) 086020, arXiv:2012.15694 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Navarro and A.-M

    N. Navarro and A.-M. Raclariu (in preparation)

  55. [63]

    An Integer Basis for Celestial Amplitudes,

    J. Cotler, N. Miller, and A. Strominger, “An Integer Basis for Celestial Amplitudes,” arXiv:2302.04905 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  56. [64]

    The shadow operator formalism for conformal algebra. vacuum expectation values and operator products,

    S. Ferrara, A. F. Grillo, G. Parisi, and R. Gatto, “The shadow operator formalism for conformal algebra. vacuum expectation values and operator products,” Lettere al Nuovo Cimento (1971-1985) 4 no. 4, (1972) 115–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907130

    1972 doi

  57. [65]

    Conformal algebra in space-time and operator product expansion,

    S. Ferrara, P. Gatto, and A. F. Grilla, “Conformal algebra in space-time and operator product expansion,” Springer Tracts Mod. Phys. 67 (1973) 1–64

    1973

  58. [66]

    Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks,

    D. Simmons-Duffin, “Projectors, Shadows, and Conformal Blocks,” JHEP 04 (2014) 146, arXiv:1204.3894 [hep-th] . 34

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,

    A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu, and S. Dutta, “Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 no. 24, (2022) 241601, arXiv:2202.08438 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Light transformation: a celestial and Carrollian perspective,

    S. Banerjee, R. Basu, and S. Atul Bhatkar, “Light transformation: a celestial and Carrollian perspective,” JHEP 12 (2024) 122, arXiv:2407.08379 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Anti de sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti de sitter space and holography,” arXiv:9802150 [hep-th]

  62. [71]

    Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion,

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Conformal partial waves and the operator product expansion,” Nucl. Phys. B 678 (2004) 491–507, arXiv:hep-th/0309180

    2004 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Conformal Partial Waves: Further Mathematical Results,

    F. A. Dolan and H. Osborn, “Conformal Partial Waves: Further Mathematical Results,” arXiv:1108.6194 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  64. [73]

    Conformally Soft Theorem in Gauge Theory,

    M. Pate, A.-M. Raclariu, and A. Strominger, “Conformally Soft Theorem in Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. D100 no. 8, (2019) 085017, arXiv:1904.10831 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  65. [74]

    Double copy structure of CFT correlators,

    J. A. Farrow, A. E. Lipstein, and P. McFadden, “Double copy structure of CFT correlators,” JHEP 02 (2019) 130, arXiv:1812.11129 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  66. [75]

    Flat-space structure of gluons and gravitons in AdS spacetime,

    Y.-Z. Li, “Flat-space structure of gluons and gravitons in AdS spacetime,” Phys. Rev. D 107 no. 12, (2023) 125018, arXiv:2212.13195 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  67. [76]

    On the differential representation and color-kinematics duality of AdS boundary correlators,

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, “On the differential representation and color-kinematics duality of AdS boundary correlators,” JHEP 05 (2022) 026, arXiv:2201.05067 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  68. [77]

    w1+∞ Algebra with a Cosmological Constant and the Celestial Sphere,

    T. R. Taylor and B. Zhu, “w1+∞ Algebra with a Cosmological Constant and the Celestial Sphere,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 no. 22, (2024) 221602, arXiv:2312.00876 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  69. [78]

    On AdS 4 deformations of celestial symmetries,

    R. Bittleston, G. Bogna, S. Heuveline, A. Kmec, L. Mason, and D. Skinner, “On AdS 4 deformations of celestial symmetries,” JHEP 07 (2024) 010, arXiv:2403.18011 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  70. [79]

    A note on three-point functions of conserved currents,

    A. Zhiboedov, “A note on three-point functions of conserved currents,” arXiv:1206.6370 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  71. [80]

    Non-Abelian currents bootstrap,

    Y.-C. He, J. Rong, N. Su, and A. Vichi, “Non-Abelian currents bootstrap,” JHEP 03 (2024) 175, arXiv:2302.11585 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  72. [81]

    Anti-de Sitter space and holography,

    E. Witten, “Anti-de Sitter space and holography,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253–291, arXiv:hep-th/9802150 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov, and A. M. Polyakov, “Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory,” Phys. Lett. B428 (1998) 105–114, arXiv:hep-th/9802109 [hep-th]

    1998 arXiv

  74. [83]

    Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,

    Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, and H. Johansson, “Perturbative Quantum Gravity as a Double Copy of Gauge Theory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 061602, arXiv:1004.0476 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  75. [84]

    Color/kinematics duality in AdS 4,

    C. Armstrong, A. E. Lipstein, and J. Mei, “Color/kinematics duality in AdS 4,” JHEP 02 (2021) 194, arXiv:2012.02059 [hep-th] . 35

    2021 arXiv

  76. [85]

    Double Copy Relation in AdS Space,

    X. Zhou, “Double Copy Relation in AdS Space,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 no. 14, (2021) 141601, arXiv:2106.07651 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [86]

    New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators,

    S. Raju, “New Recursion Relations and a Flat Space Limit for AdS/CFT Correlators,” Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 126009, arXiv:1201.6449 [hep-th] . 36

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.